The impact of socioeconomic factors on the early postoperative complication rate after laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery: A register-based cohort study

BackgroundSocioeconomic factors may influence the outcome of certain surgical procedures, but it is not known whether such factors influence the risk for postoperative complication after bariatric surgery.ObjectivesDetermining whether different socioeconomic factors influence the risk for postoperative complication after laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery.SettingNationwide in Sweden.MethodsRetrospective register-based cohort study that includes all primary laparoscopic gastric bypass procedures in Sweden between 2010 and 2016, using data from the Scandinavian Obesity Surgery Registry, Statistics Sweden, and the Swedish Population Register. Main outcome measures were occurrence and severity of early postoperative complications.ResultsIncluded in this study were 41,537 patients with 30-day follow-up percentage of 96.7%. Study groups with increased risk for postoperative complication (age, sex, body mass index, and co-morbidity adjusted–odds ratio with 95% confidence intervals) were as follows: being divorced, a widow, or a widower (1.14 [1.03–1.23]); receiving disability pension (1.37 [1.23–1.53]) or social assistance (1.22 [1.07–1.40]); and being first- (1.22 [1.04–1.44]) or second-generation (1.20 [1.09–1.32]) immigrant. In contrast, being single (.90 [.83–.99]), having higher disposable income (50th–80th percentile: .84 [.76–.93]; >80th percentile: .84 [.72–.98]), and living in a medium (.90 [.83–.98]) or small (.84 [.76–.92]) town were associated with lower risk. Increased risk for severe postoperative complication was seen for divorced, widowm, or widower (1.30 [1.12–1.52]) and those receiving disability pension (1.37 [1.16–1.61]) or social assistance (1.32 [1.08–1.62]), while higher disposable income (50th–80th percentile: .79 [.68–.92]; >80th percentile .57 [.46–.72]) was associated with lower risk.ConclusionSocioeconomic factors influence the risk for early postoperative complication after laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery. The impact is not enough to exclude patients from surgery, but they must be taken into account in preoperative risk assessment.     

Loss to follow-up after laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery – a post hoc analysis of a randomized clinical trial

BackgroundFollow-up after bariatric surgery is important if we are to identify long-term complications at an early stage and thereby improve long-term outcome. Despite great efforts, many patients are lost to follow-up. Definition of characteristics of patients failing to attend follow-up could help in defining a specific group for whom extra resources may be applied to improve the situation.ObjectivesTo identify characteristics of patients failing to attend follow-up 2 years after laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery.SettingMulticenter study, Sweden.MethodsPost hoc analysis of a randomized clinical trial in which preoperative patient characteristics and postoperative outcome measures were compared between patients who attended or did not attend a 2-year follow-up visit after laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery.ResultsOf the 2495 patients included, 260 did not attend a 2-year follow-up visit. Factors associated with higher risk for failure to attend were younger age (adjusted odds ratio [OR] .96, 95% confidence interval [CI] .94–.98/yr, P < .001); male sex (adjusted OR 2.34, 95% CI 1.51–3.63, P < .001); depression (adjusted OR 1.61, 95% CI 1.05–2.47, P = .029); history of smoking (adjusted OR 1.78, 95% CI 1.26–2.51, P = .001); being single (adjusted OR 1.47, 95% CI 1.03–2.11, P = .036); and being first-generation immigrant (adjusted OR 1.74, 95% CI 1.05–2.88; P = .032). Elementary occupation (adjusted OR .42, 95% CI .18–.99, P = .047) was associated with lower risk.ConclusionThese findings indicate that there are preoperative characteristics that may help in identifying patients likely to fail to attend follow-up visits after laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery. Special effort should be made to inform these patients of the importance of follow-up and to encourage them to attend.     

Predictive factors of complications in revisional gastric bypass surgery: results from the Scandinavian Obesity Surgery Registry

BackgroundRoux-en-Y gastric bypass is the most common procedure for revisional bariatric surgery. This study is an analysis of revisional gastric bypass operations (rGBP) compared with primary gastric bypass (pGBP) performed in Sweden between 2007 and 2016.ObjectiveThe aim was to compare the incidence of adverse events in primary and revisional gastric bypass surgery and to identify predictive factors of intraoperative, early, and late complications in revisional gastric bypass surgery.SettingForty-four hospitals.MethodsRegistered study from the Scandinavian Obesity Surgery Registry. The study group (rGBP) comprised 1795 patients, and the control group (pGBP) comprised 46,055 patients.ResultsMedian follow-up time was 28 months. The rate of open procedures was significantly higher in the rGBP group (39.1% versus 2.4%; P < .001) decreasing from 70.8% in 2007 to 8.5% in 2016. Intraoperative complications (15.5% versus 3.0%, P < .001), early complications (24.6% versus 8.7%; P < .001), and late complications (17.7% versus 8.7%; P < .001) occurred more often in the rGBP group. Open access in revisional surgery was an independent risk factor for intraoperative complications (odds ratio 3.87; 95% confidence interval: 2.69–5.57, P < .001), early complications (odds ratio 2.08; 95% confidence interval: 1.53–2.83, P < .001), and late complications (odds ratio 1.91; 95% confidence interval: 1.31–2.78, P = .001). Indication for revision or type of index operation were not associated with complications.ConclusionRGBP was associated with a higher incidence of intraoperative, early, and late complications compared with pGBP. Open access in revisional surgery was predictive of complications regardless of the index operation or indication for revision.     

Incidence and treatment of leak at the gastrojejunostomy in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a cohort study of 40,844 patients

BackgroundLeak at the gastrojejunostomy (GJ) after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is a rare but life-threatening complication.ObjectivesTo assess incidence, risk factors, treatment, and outcome of leaks at the GJ after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in a nationwide cohort.SettingSweden.MethodsLeaks at GJ within 30 days postoperatively in 40,844 patients (age 41 yr, females 76%, and body mass index of 42.4 kg/m²) between 2007 and 2014 in the Scandinavian Obesity Surgery Registry were assessed. Register data and outcomes were verified by reviewing patient charts. Logistic regression was done to estimate odds ratios (ORs) for significant risk factors.ResultsLeak at the GJ was registered in 262 (.6%) patients, with 44% diagnosed within the first 3 postoperative days. Risk factors were male sex (OR 1.5 [1.1–1.9]), age ≥49 years (OR 1.9 [1.3–2.7]), diabetes (OR 1.4 [1.1–1.9]), conversion to open surgery (OR 3.9 [2.2–6.9]), and operative time ≥90 minutes (OR 2.6 [1.8–3.8]). In most patients, the leak resulted in a severe complication. Reoperative surgery was done in 85%, with the placement of a feeding gastrostomy in 24%. Stents were used at some time point in 31% of leaks. Of all patients with leaks, 25% required intensive care, 4% developed multiorgan failure, and 1% died. Median duration of stay for patients with leaks was 22 days, versus 2 days for others (P < .001).ConclusionGJ leaks occurred in .6% of patients. Risk factors were male sex, age ≥49 years, diabetes, operative time ≥90 minutes, and conversion to open surgery. Surgical reintervention was common. Mortality was 1%.     

Measuring the small bowel length may decrease the incidence of malnutrition after laparoscopic one-anastomosis gastric bypass with tailored bypass limb

BackgroundLaparoscopic one (single)-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) is an effective and durable treatment for morbidly obese patients. However, the ideal length of the small bowel bypass remains controversial.ObjectivesThe study aimed to report the clinical results of using a tailored bypass based on the total length of the small bowel.SettingAcademic medical center.MethodsSince 2005, we have performed OAGB with tailored limb according to preoperative body mass index. From July 2014, we modified our technique, measuring the whole small bowel length to keep the common channel at least 400-cm long. Data from 470 patients treated with the new technique (Group II) were compared with those of a matched group treated with tailored bypass only (Group I). The preoperative clinical data and outcomes were analyzed. All clinical data were prospectively collected and stored.ResultsBoth groups had similar clinical profiles at baseline. All procedures were completed laparoscopically. Group II had a significant longer operation time (161.9 versus 122.6 min; P < .001), but shorter hospital stay (2.9 versus 5.3 d; P < .001) and lower complication rate (.2% versus 1.5%; P = .002) than Group I. One year after surgery, the mean body mass index (27.4 versus 26.8 kg/m²; P = .244), percent total weight loss (32.0% versus 34.0%; P = .877), and diabetes remission rate (84.7% versus 84.1%; P = .876) were comparable between the 2 groups. However, Group II patients had a significantly lower incidence of anemia (5.9% versus 11.1%; P < .001), secondary hyperparathyroidism (21.7% versus 33.8%; P < .001) and hypoalbuminemia (1.5% versus 2.8%; P < .001) than did Group I.ConclusionRoutine measurement of the whole bowel length to keep the common channel at least 400-cm long may reduce the incidence of malnutrition after OAGB with tailored limb bypass, without compromising efficacy in weight loss and diabetes resolution.     

Hospital utilization 4 years after bariatric surgery: sleeve gastrectomy versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

BackgroundWhile sleeve gastrectomy (SG) has lower perioperative risk compared with Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), long-term data about their differential impact on overall health are unclear. Hospital use after bariatric surgery is an important parameter for improving peri- and postoperative care.ObjectiveThis present study was aimed to compare SG and RYGB in terms of their effect on long-term hospital-based healthcare utilization.SettingMulticenter, statewide database.MethodsA retrospective cohort study of adult patients who underwent SG and RYGB between 2009 and 2011, with follow-up until 2015 and 2-year presurgery information. Propensity score–matched SG and RYGB groups were created using preoperative demographic characteristics, co-morbidities, and presurgery hospital use, measured by cumulative length of stay (LOS) and frequency of emergency department visits. Postsurgery yearly LOS, incidence of hospital visits, and the reason for the visit were compared. Primary outcomes included postoperative hospital visits during years 1 to 4 after bariatric surgery and cumulative LOS. Secondary outcomes included specific reasons for hospital use.ResultsThere were 3540 SG and 13,587 RYGB patients, whose mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) LOS was 1.3 (1.3–1.4), .9 (.8–1), 1 (.9–1.1), and 1.2 (1–1.3) days at years 1 through 4, respectively. Postoperative yearly LOS was similar between the 2 propensity-matched groups. The risk of hospitalizations (odd ratio .73, 95% CI .64–.84, P < .0001) and emergency department visits (odds ratio .84, 95% CI .75–.95, P = .005) was significantly lower for SG, during the first postoperative year. The reverse was seen at the fourth postoperative year, with higher risk of emergency department use after SG (odds ratio 1.16, 95% CI 1.01–1.33, P = .035).ConclusionPostoperative 4-year hospital utilization remains low for both SG and RYGB. The previously established lower early perioperative risk of SG was not appreciated for longer-term hospital use compared with RYGB.     

Micronutrient intake and biochemistry in adolescents adherent or nonadherent to supplements 5 years after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery

BackgroundRoux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is an effective obesity treatment in adults and has become established in adolescents. Lower adherence to supplementation in adolescents confers a risk for long-term nutritional deficiencies.ObjectivesTo assess adherence to supplementation, micronutrient intake, and biochemistry in adolescents through 5 years after RYGB.SettingUniversity hospitals, multicenter study, Sweden.MethodsMicronutrient intake and adherence to supplementation were assessed by diet history interviews and biochemistry preoperatively, 1, 2, and 5 years after RYGB in 85 adolescents (67% females), aged 16.5 years (± 1.2) with a body mass index of 45.5 kg/m² (± 6.0). Adherence was defined as taking prescribed supplements ≥3 times a week. Micronutrient intake and biochemistry were compared with matched controls at 5 years.ResultsOver 75% completed the dietary assessments across 5 years after RYGB. Adherence ranged between 44–61% through 5 years. At 5 years, ferritin and hemoglobin decreased (P < .04) and 61% had iron deficiency (P ≤ .001). Among females with iron deficiency, most did not adhere to supplementation (P = .005), and 59% of these had anemia (P < .001). Vitamin D insufficiency continued after surgery and 80% of participants who did not adhere to supplementation had insufficiency (P = .002). Adolescents not adhering had lower levels of vitamin D, B₁₂, and ferritin (females) compared with both adhering adolescents and the control group (all P < .04).ConclusionsHalf of adolescents after RYGB reported sufficient long-term adherence to supplementation. Adhering to supplements and reporting a higher micronutrient intake were associated with more favorable biochemistry. Results support the recommendations for monitoring micronutrient intake and biochemistry in all patients who have undergone RYGB surgery, and the recommendation of higher preventive supplementation of vitamin D and iron in both sexes. As hypothesized, adolescents not adhering had a higher prevalence of long-term micronutrient deficiencies.     

Gastrointestinal symptoms before and after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a longitudinal assessment

BackgroundRoux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is an effective treatment for morbid obesity, but many patients have increased gastrointestinal symptoms.ObjectivesTo evaluate gastrointestinal symptoms and food intolerance before and after RYGB over time in a large cohort of morbidly obese patients.SettingA high-volume bariatric center of excellence.MethodsA prospective cohort study was performed in patients who underwent RYGB between September 2014 and July 2015, with 2-year follow-up. Consecutive patients screened for bariatric surgery answered the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) and a food intolerance questionnaire before RYGB and 2 years after surgery. The prevalence of gastrointestinal symptoms before and after surgery and the association between patient characteristics and postoperative gastrointestinal symptoms were assessed.ResultsFollow-up was 86.2% (n = 168) for patients undergoing primary RYGB and 93.3% (n = 28) for revisional RYGB. The total mean GSRS score increased from 1.69 to 2.31 after surgery (P < .001), as did 13 of 16 of the individual scores. Preoperative GSRS score is associated with postoperative symptom severity (B = .343, P < .001). Food intolerance was present in 16.1% of patients before primary RYGB, increasing to 69.6% after surgery (P < .001). Patients who underwent revisional RYGB had a symptom severity and prevalence of food intolerance comparable with that among patients with primary RYGB, even though they had more symptoms before revisional surgery.ConclusionsTwo years after surgery, patients who underwent primary RYGB have increased gastrointestinal symptoms and food intolerance compared with the preoperative state. It is important that clinicians are aware of this and inform patients before surgery.     

Surgical therapy of weight regain after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

BackgroundRoux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is a well-established surgical method for morbid obesity; however, weight regain (WR) after initially good results may be considered an issue, the treatment of which has found no consensus yet.ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to compare the different surgical methods treating WR after RYGB that are used at the Vienna Medical University in a larger number of patients, concerning further weight loss, complications, and reoperations.SettingUniversity hospital, Austria.MethodsThis study includes all patients with RYGB who were reoperated due to WR at the Vienna Medical University by December 2016 (n = 84). The follow-up rate was 93%. The following 4 approaches to treating WR after RYGB were taken: (1) pouch resizing, (2) pouch banding, (3) pouch resizing plus pouch banding, and (4) common limb shortening (i.e., distalization).ResultsThe mean maximum excess weight loss referring to the WR procedure in the 4 groups was as follows: group 1: 69.0% ± 35.2%, group 2: 62.8% ± 39.5%, group 3: 83.1% ± 30.9%, and group 4: 81.5% ± 41.6%. Reoperations occurred in the following different groups: group 1 had 2 balloon dilations (20%), groups 2 (n = 13) and 3 (n = 29) had 5 (38% and 17%) band removals each, and group 4 had 9 reversal procedures due to malnutrition (30%).ConclusionsThere are nonsignificant differences in terms of additional weight loss between the different methods. However, differences lay in the areas of adverse symptoms and further reoperations. While there was no risk of malnutrition with pouch resizing, there was with distalization. Pouch banding (with or without resizing) poses a higher risk of dysphagia.     

Perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy in super-obese and super-super-obese patients: a national database analysis

BackgroundEvidence remains contradictory for perioperative outcomes of super-obese (SO) and super-super-obese (SSO) patients undergoing bariatric surgery.ObjectiveTo identify national 30-day morbidity and mortality of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) in SO and SSO patients.SettingThe Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program database.MethodsAll LSG and LRYGB patients from 2015 through 2017 in the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program database were grouped based on body mass index (BMI) as follows: morbidly obese (MO; BMI 35.0–49.9 kg/m²), SO (BMI 50.0–59.9 kg/m²), and SSO (BMI ≥60.0 kg/m²). Complications and mortality within 30 days were compared between BMI groups using Pearson X² or Fischer’s exact tests. Multivariate logistic regression was used to adjust for demographic characteristics and co-morbidities, and adjusted odds ratio (AOR) was reported for each outcome.ResultsOf 356,621 patients, 71.6% had LSG and 28.4% LRYGB. A total of 272,195 patients were in the MO group, 65,565 in the SO group, and 18,861 in the SSO group. Higher BMI was associated with increased overall morbidity and mortality. The overall complication rate was significantly higher for SO (AOR = 1.20, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.13–1.28 for LSG; AOR = 1.08, 95% CI 1.01–1.15 for LRYGB) and SSO (AOR = 1.44, 95% CI 1.31–1.58 for LSG; AOR = 1.31, 95% CI 1.19–1.45 for LRYGB) compared with the MO group. Mortality was also significantly higher for SO (AOR = 1.65, 95% CI 1.10–2.48 for LSG; AOR = 1.85, 95% CI 1.23–2.80 for LRYGB) and SSO (AOR = 3.30, 95% CI 1.98–5.48 for LSG; AOR = 3.32, 95% CI 1.93–5.73 for LRYGB) compared with the MO group.ConclusionsSO and SSO patients are at increased risk of 30-day morbidity and mortality compared with MO patients. Despite this elevated perioperative risk, the overall risk of these procedures remains low and acceptable especially as bariatric surgery is the durable treatment option for obesity.     

Conversion of one-anastomosis gastric bypass to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: short-term results from a tertiary referral center

BackgroundOne-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB), also known as minigastric bypass, is an increasingly popular bariatric surgery option worldwide. While OAGB offers advantage in terms of procedure time and technical ease, revisional operations to correct complications may be necessary.ObjectivesWe aimed to describe the indications and perioperative outcomes for OAGB conversions to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) at a single-referral center.SettingAcademic hospital, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.MethodsAll patients undergoing conversion from OAGB to RYGB from February 2016 through September 2018 were retrospectively identified from a prospectively maintained database of revisional bariatric surgeries.ResultsSixteen patients underwent conversion from previous OAGB to RYGB during the study period. The cohort was 62.5% female (n = 10) with a mean age of 40.2 years and median body mass index of 30.7 kg/m². Indications for conversion included intractable nausea/vomiting (n = 8, 50.0%), biliary reflux (n = 3, 18.8%), weight recidivism (n = 3, 18.8%), and protein-calorie malnutrition (n = 2, 12.5%). Twelve cases (75.0%) were successfully completed with a laparoscopic approach, with 4 cases (25.0%) converted to open. The median length of stay was 5.5 days. Six patients (37.5%) experienced minor and major complications within 30 days of discharge. Fourteen patients (87.5%) were available for follow-up at 6 months, with 100% of these patients reporting resolution of their preoperative symptoms. There were no mortalities.ConclusionsData from this largest reported single-center experience demonstrates that conversion of OAGB to RYGB is safe and technically feasible. Further studies and longer-term follow-up are needed to definitively describe outcomes after this revisional bariatric surgery.     

Safety of concomitant cholecystectomy with laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and gastric bypass: a MBSAQIP analysis

BackgroundGallstone disease occurs more commonly in the obese population and is often diagnosed during the preoperative evaluation for bariatric surgery.ObjectivesThis study analyzed outcomes of laparoscopic gastric bypass (LGB) and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SG), with and without cholecystectomy (LC), using data from the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program.SettingPatients reported to Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program participating centers in the United States and Canada in 2015.MethodsAll cases of LGB and SG, with and without LC, were analyzed. A 1:1 propensity-matched cohort was created for both SG and LGB, with and without concomitant LC. Multivariate logistic regression stratified by procedure was used to identify predictors of major complications after SG and LGB, using concomitant LC as a predictor. We also constructed a model for surgical site infections (SSIs) for SG group.ResultsOf 98,292 sleeve operations, 2046 (2%) had concomitant LC. Of 44,427 bypass operations, 1426 (3%) had concomitant LC. For the sleeve group, concomitant LC increased operative time by an average of 27 minutes but did not affect length of stay, mortality, or major complications. Concomitant LC was associated with increased SSI (1% versus .4%) and need for reoperation (1.6% versus .7%) in univariate models. After adjusting for other predictors, concomitant LC was associated with increased risk for SSI (odds ratio 2.5, confidence interval 1.0–5.9, P = .04). For the bypass group, concomitant LC increased operative time by an average of 28 minutes to the operation, and postoperative length of stay averaged ～5 hours longer (2.4 versus 2.2 d, P = .03). Thirty-day complications were similar between the groups. On multivariate analysis, concomitant LC was not a significant risk factor for major complications. Only operative time was an independent factor for major complications.ConclusionsConcomitant LC with laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy or gastric bypass did not affect mortality or risk of major complication. For sleeve patients, concomitant LC was associated with a .6% increased risk (.4% to 1.0%) of SSI. Concomitant LC with laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy or gastric bypass is safe when indicated for gallstone disease.     

Possible relation between partial small bowel obstruction and severe postprandial reactive hypoglycemia after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

BackgroundAlthough dietary treatment ameliorates symptoms in most patients with postbariatric hypoglycemia (PBH), there is a subgroup with severe symptoms that do not respond sufficiently to either diet or drugs. A clinical observation showed that those patients additionally experienced postprandial abdominal discomfort or pain.ObjectivesThis report describes patients with severe PBH following laparoscopic Roux-en Y gastric bypass undergoing corrective surgery to alleviate partial small bowel obstruction (kink, adhesions, dysfunctional anastomosis) and the subsequent outcome regarding symptoms of PBH.SettingSahlgrenska University Hospital, Sweden.MethodsRetrospective analysis regarding hypoglycemic symptoms from medical records and a complementary telephone interview.ResultsOut of 80 patients treated for severe PBH at our tertiary academic surgical unit over the last 4 years, 38 underwent corrective surgery (adhesiolysis and/or a reconstructed jejuno-jejunostomy). Out of 21 patients using medications to control hypoglycemia before corrective surgery, 19 (90.5%) discontinued the medication, and 5 of 19 (26%) no longer needed to use a blood glucometer or a continuous glucose monitor. Although patients after surgical correction still could experience PBH, symptoms were less frequent and less severe. Postprandial abdominal symptoms decreased, and patients reported improved eating quality. Patient interviews revealed that 8% became entirely free of PBH symptoms after surgery and 71% experienced significant relief.ConclusionsWe propose a possible association between severe hypoglycemic symptoms after laparoscopic Roux-en Y gastric bypass and partial small bowel obstruction. Patients with PBH not responding adequately to diet and drug treatment may benefit from assessment and intervention for partial small bowel obstruction.     

Predictors and outcomes of leak after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: an analysis of the MBSAQIP data registry

BackgroundGastrointestinal leak is one of the most severe postoperative complications after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), occurring in up to 2% of all patients. This has led to adoption of simpler procedures, such as sleeve gastrectomy, which have improved safety profiles but potentially less effective long-term metabolic outcomes. Yet, in contrast to sleeve gastrectomy, a paucity of modern literature exists regarding predictors of leak for RYGB.ObjectivesThe purpose of this study was to examine gastrointestinal leak in patients undergoing RYGB using the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement data registry.MethodsWe identified all Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement patients who underwent RYGB in 2015 and 2016. Primary outcomes of interest include identifying the prevalence, impact, and predictors of leak in RYGB patients. Our secondary outcomes of interest include characterizing overall complication rates in RYGB patients. Univariate analysis of pre-, intra-, and postoperative variables was performed using Χ² tests for categoric data and independent sample t test for continuous data. A nonparsimonious multivariable logistic regression model was then developed to determine predictive factors for development of leak.SettingAll centers belonging to the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement data registry.ResultsA total of 77,596 patients underwent RYGB from 2015 to 2016. The majority of patients were female (79.8%), white (75.9%), and underwent laparoscopic RYGB (89.7%). The mean age of patients was 45.2 years (standard deviation 11.9) with a mean body mass index of 46.3 kg/m² (standard deviation 8.17). Complication rates for RYGB were low with a mortality of .16% and a total complication rate of 7.5%. A total of 476 leaks were identified with an overall leak rate of .6% and a mortality of 1.5%. Leak was associated with a statistically significant increase in all complications as well as readmission, reoperation, and mortality rates at 30 days. Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed the following statistically significant independent predictors of leak: body mass index, age, operative length, American Society of Anesthesiologists score >3, prior pulmonary embolus, and partially dependent functional status. Albumin was the only independent protective variable after adjusting for confounders and interactions.ConclusionUsing the robust Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement database, we found RYGB to be a safe procedure with low morbidity and mortality. The overall leak rate was .6% with leak significantly increasing all other complications, readmission, reoperation, and mortality rates at 30 days. Logistic regression identified prior pulmonary embolus and partially dependent functional status as the 2 largest predictors of leak while increased albumin was the only protective factor. Optimizing preoperative nutrition and strength in these patients through structured multidisciplinary programs may therefore have a role in the ongoing improvement of outcomes after RYGB.     

Systematic review and meta-analysis of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass against laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for amelioration of NAFLD using four criteria

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) prevalence is rising worldwide, as a direct consequence of the obesity epidemic. Bariatric surgery provides proven NAFLD amelioration, although questions remain regarding whether Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) or laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is more effective. To answer this question, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis exclusively comparing RYGB and LSG for amelioration of NAFLD using 4 separate criteria: alanine transaminase, aspartate transaminase, NAFLD activity score, and NAFLD fibrosis score. Our search included 1290 initial studies, which were narrowed to 20 final studies in the meta-analysis. Overall, both RYGB and LSG significantly improved alanine transaminase, aspartate transaminase, NAFLD activity score, and NAFLD fibrosis score postoperatively. Direct comparisons of RYGB to LSG in any of the 4 criteria failed to demonstrate superiority. Our findings corroborate the current literature showing that bariatric surgery significantly improves biochemical and histologic parameters in patients with NAFLD. The novel individual comparisons of 4 criteria failed to show superiority between RYGB and LSG in ameliorating NAFLD. Despite several limitations, our study can assist clinicians by supporting the notion that RYGB and LSG may be equally efficacious in ameliorating NAFLD.     

Dehydration risk factors and impact after bariatric surgery: an analysis using a national database

BackgroundDehydration is a common complication after bariatric surgery and often quoted as the reason for emergency department (ED) visits and readmission.ObjectiveWe sought to investigate risk factors for dehydration after bariatric surgery and evaluate its impact on ED visits and readmission.SettingThe Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program database.MethodsWe used the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program database to identify patients who underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy or laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) from 2016 through 2017. The primary outcome was need for outpatient treatment of dehydration within 30 days postsurgery. Secondary outcomes were association between need for outpatient dehydration therapy and 30-day readmission or ED evaluation not resulting in admission.ResultsOf 256,817 patients, 73% underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and 27% LRYGB. Of 9592 patients who required dehydration treatment, they were more often younger than age 40, female, black, had a ≥3-day length of stay during their index admission, and experienced a postoperative complication. More patients receiving LRYGB than laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy required treatment for dehydration. On multivariable analysis, independent-risk factors for postoperative dehydration treatment included LRYGB, length of stay ≥3 days, gastroesophageal reflux disease, hypertension, previous deep vein thrombosis, chronic steroid/immunosuppression, and a postoperative complication. Patients who developed dehydration requiring treatment compared with those that did not had adjusted odds ratio of 3.7 (95% confidence interval: 3.44–3.96; P < .001) and 22 (95% confidence interval: 21.05–23.06; P < .001) of readmission and ED visit.ConclusionDehydration is a strong risk factor for postoperative ED visits and readmission. Closer surveillance and proactive measures for those at higher risk may prevent the development of postoperative dehydration.     

Effect of the closure of mesenteric defects in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a prospective study

BackgroundInternal hernias (IH) are a recognized problem in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) that can cause intestinal obstruction. The routine closure of the mesenteric defects (MDs) to prevent IH in the LRYGB remains controversial.ObjectivesThe main objective of our study was to evaluate the risk of reopening at the level of both MDs, the Petersen space, and the intermesenteric gap.SettingUniversity hospital.MethodsProspective cohort of patients with a history of LRYGB, all with closure of both MDs, and in whom another intra-abdominal surgery was performed after the LRYGB, between January 2013 and December 2018. The status of both MDs was recorded. All analyses were performed with Stata version 15 software with a level of significance of .05.ResultsA total of 76 patients were included. The average time that elapsed between the LRYGB and the surgery that evaluated the state of the MDs was 22.8 months. The patients lost on average 34.7 kg, with a minimum of 8 kg and a maximum of 76 kg. The indications for the interventions were cholelithiasis (68.3%), recurrent abdominal pain (13.2%), intestinal obstruction (11.8%), malabsorption syndrome (7.3%), and bilateral inguinal hernia (2.4%). At the time of surgery, 52 patients (68.4%) had a completely closed Petersen space; 58 patients (76.3%) had a completely closed intermesenteric defect. Both MDs were closed in 36 patients (47.4%), and 33 patients (43.4%) had at least 1 of the MDs open.ConclusionThe closure of MDs eliminated the risk of IH in half of the operated patients of LRYGB in this series.