Effects of the craniocervical flexion and isometric neck exercise compared in patients with chronic neck pain: A randomized controlled trial

ABSTRACT

Introduction: The present study compared the effects of neck isometric exercise (NIE) and craniocervical flexion exercise (CFE) on cervical lordosis, muscle endurance of cervical flexion, neck disability index (NDI), and active cervical range of motion (ACROM) in all three planes in patients with non-specific, chronic neck pain (CNP). Materials and Methods: Forty-one patients from a university hospital-based rehabilitation center were randomly assigned to an experimental (22 patients performing CFE) or control (19 patients performing NIE) group. All patients performed three 30-second repetitions of stretching exercises for the neck flexor, extensor, lateral flexor, and rotator as warm-up and cool-down exercises. The patients in the experimental group then underwent CFE 30 minutes/day, 3 times a week, for 8 weeks, while the control group underwent NIE. The main outcome measures were pain on visual analogue scale (VAS) and perceived disability based on the neck disability index (NDI). The secondary outcomes were cervical lordosis measured by an absolute rotation angle (ARA), muscle endurance of cervical flexion, and ACROM. Results: Both groups showed improved pain, NDI, endurance of the cervical flexor muscles, and ACROM in all three planes after 8 weeks (p < 0.001 for all). All these outcomes, except for the NDI, showed significantly greater improvements following CFE than following NIE (p < 0.05 for all). In particular, a significantly improved ARA of cervical lordosis was found following CFE but not following NIE (p < 0.05). Conclusions: CFE targeted at retraining the craniocervical flexor muscles was useful for improving or restoring the pain, cervical lordosis, and neck-related function disorders among patients with non-specific CNP.     

Osteopathic manipulative treatment combined with exercise improves pain and disability in individuals with non-specific chronic neck pain: A pragmatic randomized controlled trial

PurposeTo determine effectiveness of osteopathic manipulative treatment combined with stretching and strengthening exercises in the cervical region on pain and disability in individuals with non-specific chronic neck pain.Methods90 adults with non-specific chronic neck pain were randomized to either exercises group (EG, n = 45) or osteopathic manipulative treatment associated with exercises group (OMT/EG, n = 45). The primary outcomes were obtained by the use of Numeric Pain-Rating Scale (NPRS), Pressure Pain Threshold (PPT) and Neck Disability Index (NDI). Secondary outcomes included range of motion (ROM) for cervical spine rotation, Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire Work/Physical Activity (FABQ-W/PA) and Pain-self efficacy at two different moments: baseline and 4 weeks after the first treatment. Techniques and dosages of OMT were selected pragmatically by a registered osteopath. Generalized Estimating Equations model (GEE), complemented by the Least Significant Difference (LSD) and the intention-to-treat analysis, was used to assess the clinical outcomes.ResultsAnalysis with GEE indicated that OMT/EG reduced pain and disability more than the EG alone after 4 weeks of treatment with statistically significant difference (p < 0,05), as well as cervical active rotation was significantly improved (p = 0.03). There were no between-group differences observed in Pressure Pain Threshold (PPT) measure, Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire and Pain-self efficacy.ConclusionThe association between OMT and exercises reduces pain and improves functional disability more than only exercise for individuals with non-specific chronic neck pain.     

Effects of auricular acupressure on pain and disability in adults with chronic neck pain

AimThe aim of this study was to examine the effect of auricular acupressure (AA) on pain, pain threshold (PT), disability, and cervical range of motion in adults with chronic neck pain.BackgroundAbout 30–50% of the world's population suffers from chronic neck pain, and the cost of treatment is increasing.Materials and methodsThis single-blind, randomized sham-controlled study was conducted on 48 adults with chronic neck pain in South Korea. The experimental group (n = 25) received AA on specific acupoints for neck pain, whereas the control group (n = 23) received AA on unspecific acupoints. Participants received 4 weeks of auricular-acupressure intervention. Outcomes were assessed by the visual analog scale (VAS), PT, neck-disability index (NDI), and cervical range of motion. Measurements were taken 3 times: before intervention, 2 weeks into the intervention, and after the intervention.ResultsStatistical differences between the two groups emerged in PT (p = .003), the NDI (p = .033), cervical flexion (p = .004), and left rotation (p = .004), but not on the VAS.ConclusionsThis study showed that AA leads to improvements on PT, neck disability, and cervical range of motion. Therefore, AA can be used as an alternative nursing intervention for chronic neck pain.     

Vacuum myofascial therapy device for non-specific neck pain. A single blind randomized clinical trial

ObjectivesThis study aimed to investigate the efficacy of a vacuum myofascial therapy device (VT) for improving pressure pain thresholds (PPTs), range of motion (ROM), neck pain-related disability, pain, and quality of life in patients with non-specific neck pain.MethodsA randomized controlled trial in which thirty-eight participants with non-specific neck pain (NP) were randomly assigned to either an experimental (VT) or a comparison physical therapy program (PTP) group. The VT group (n = 19) received five sessions of treatment with a vacuum myofascial therapy device while the PTP group (n = 19) received five sessions of massage, ultrasound therapy (US), and transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation (TENS) over two weeks. The outcome measures were the numerical pain rating scale (NPRS), range of motion, quality of life (SF-12), neck disability Index (NDI), and PPTs at the end of treatment and at one-month follow-up.ResultsAlthough both groups experienced improvements in pain, neck disability, range of motion, and pressure pain, these only were statistically significant in the VT group. At one-month follow-up, the VT group still showed improvements in pain, neck disability, and range of motion.DiscussionVacuum myofascial therapy applied with a device offers similar results to other vacuum-based techniques such as cupping therapy. Moreover, in this device the parameters are digitally controlled, which allows for the precise reproduction of treatment.     

Mechanical Pain Sensitivity and the Severity of Chronic Neck Pain and Disability Are Not Modulated Across the Menstrual Cycle

Despite the high prevalence of neck pain among women, menstrual effects on regional pain outcomes have not been investigated in this clinical population. This study evaluated menstrual effects on mechanical pain sensitivity (pressure pain threshold [PPT]), neck pain intensity (numeric pain rating scale [NPRS]), and neck-related disability (Neck Disability Index [NDI]) in 22 normally menstruating (NM) and 17 hormonal contraceptive users with chronic neck pain. Sex hormones, PPT, and NDI were measured during the early follicular (F1), late follicular (F2), and luteal (L) menstrual phases. Daily NPRS scores were recorded in an online symptom diary and averaged within each phase. Estradiol and progesterone increased only for NM women in F2 and L, respectively. Phase effects on PPT (η² = .003), NDI (η² = .003), and NPRS (η² = .016) for NM women were small and did not differ from those for the hormonal contraceptive users (P ≥ .386). Averaged across the menstrual cycle, PPT scores explained 29% of the variance in NPRS scores for NM women but were not associated with NDI scores in either group. Results indicate that the magnitude of menstrual effects on mechanical pain sensitivity and the severity of neck pain and disability do not exceed thresholds of clinically detectable change in women with chronic neck pain.     

Characterization of Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty in a Real-World Setting and Pain-Related Medication Prescriptions for Management of Postoperative Pain

ABSTRACT

This observational study characterized medication use in the immediate postoperative period among patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) at an academic medical center, and evaluated pain (0–10 numerical pain rating scale [NPRS]; 0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain that the patient can imagine), function (Harris Hip Score [HSS] and Lower Extremity Function Scale [LEFS]), and health-related quality of life (SF-36). Study patients (N = 115; 59% female; average age 61.3 ± 12.0 years; mean BMI of 29.9 ± 6.9 kg/m²) who underwent THA between September 1, 2008, and November 30, 2010, and met study inclusion criteria were drawn from the University of Utah Orthopedic Clinic database. The most common comorbidities in these patients were osteoarthritis, hypertension, and chronic back pain. The most frequently prescribed class of pain-related medications in the immediate postoperative period was opioids. The most common nonopioid medications were bupivacaine, celecoxib, and midazolam. Opioids and celecoxib continued to be commonly prescribed at discharge. Pain was improved at a 6-week follow-up (mean change ?3.3 ± 3.3 points), as were HSS and LEFS, with mean changes of 19.9 ± 24.2 and 8.7 ± 16.9 points (P < .01 for both), respectively. Although SF-36 scores were also improved, these scores were significantly lower relative to normative values for the US general population as well as relative to individuals having both osteoarthritis and hypertension.     

Immediate effects of thoracic spine self-mobilization in patients with mechanical neck pain: A randomized controlled trial

ObjectivesTo investigate the immediate effects of thoracic spine self-mobilization in patients with mechanical neck pain.Study designRandomized, controlled trial.BackgroundThoracic spine self-mobilization is performed after thoracic spine thrust manipulation to augment and maintain its effects. To the best of our knowledge, no study has investigated the effects of thoracic spine self-mobilization alone in individuals with mechanical neck pain. The purpose of this randomized, controlled trial was to evaluate the immediate effects of thoracic spine self-mobilization alone without any other intervention on disability, pain, and cervical range of motion in patients with mechanical neck pain.MethodsFifty-two patients (39 females and 13 males) with mechanical neck pain were randomly allocated to either a thoracic spine self-mobilization group that was performing a thoracic spine active flexion and extension activity using two tennis balls fixed by athletic tape or a placebo thoracic spine self-mobilization group. Outcome measures were collected at pre-intervention and immediately after intervention, including the Neck Disability Index, visual analogue scale, and active cervical range of motion (ROM). The immediate effect of the intervention was analyzed using two-way repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA). If interactions were found, a simple main effect test was performed to compare the pre-post intra-group results.ResultsThe results of two-way repeated measures ANOVA indicated that the main effect of time was significant (p < 0.05) for all measurement outcomes. The main effect of group was not significant for all measurement outcomes (p > 0.05). The group × time interactions for cervical flexion active ROM (p = 0.005) and cervical extension active ROM (p = 0.036) were significant. The tests of simple main effect in cervical flexion active ROM (p < 0.0001) and cervical extension active ROM (p < 0.0001) showed a significant difference before and after intervention in the thoracic spine self-mobilization group.ConclusionPatients with mechanical neck pain who carried out thoracic spine self-mobilization showed increases in active cervical flexion and extension ROM.     

Effects of Kinesio Taping on Post-Needling Induced Pain After Dry Needling of Active Trigger Point in Individuals With Mechanical Neck Pain

ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to assess the effectiveness of the application of kinesio taping in reducing induced pain after dry needling of active trigger points (TrPs) to the upper trapezius muscle.MethodsConsecutive patients had mechanical neck pain (n = 34, 44% female) with active TrPs in the upper trapezius muscle. All participants received dry needling into upper trapezius active TrPs. Then, they were randomly divided into a kinesio taping group, which received an adhesive tape (Kinesio Tex), and a control group, which did not receive the taping. The numeric pain rating scale was assessed (0-10) at post-needling; immediately after; and 24 hours, 48 hours, and 72 hours after needling. Neck- and shoulder-related disability was assessed before and 72 hours after needling with the Neck Disability Index (NDI) and the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index, respectively. The pressure pain threshold (PPT) over the TrP was also assessed post-needling, immediately post-intervention, and 72 hours after needling.ResultsThe analysis of covariance did not find a significant group × time interaction (P = .26) for post-needling soreness: both groups exhibited similar changes in post-needling induced pain (P < .001). No significant group × time interactions were observed for changes in NDI (P = .62), SPADI (P = .41), or PPTs (P = .52): similar improvements were found after the needling procedure for the NDI (P < .001), Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (P < .001), and PPT (P < .001). The number of local twitch responses and sex (all, P > .30) did not influence the effect for any outcome.ConclusionThe application of kinesio taping after dry needling of active TrPs in the upper trapezius muscle was not effective for reducing post-needling induced pain in people with mechanical neck pain. Further, the application of kinesio taping as a post-needling intervention did not influence short-term changes in disability.     

The prevalence of primary dysmenorrhea among students and its association with musculoskeletal and myofascial pain

ObjectivesTo examine the association between dysmenorrhea and musculoskeletal pain amongst university students aged 20–35 and the association between dysmenorrhea and the occurrence of MTrPs.MethodsThe study comprised two stages: a cross-sectional study evaluated the association between dysmenorrhea and musculoskeletal pain and a case-control study evaluated the association between dysmenorrhea and the occurrence of MTrPs in the abdominal and pelvic area. Initially, questionnaires such as demographics, menstruation characteristics, Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), measuring the average pain during menstruation and Nordic, were distributed to female students. Twenty subjects who suffered from menstrual pain of >3 on the NPRS (ones with the highest scores) were included in the second stage as cases. An additional 20 who had not suffered from menstrual pain (NPRS ≤3) were considered controls. All 40 subjects underwent an assessment of MTrPs by two examiners blinded to each other's results and to the group allocation of the subjects.ResultsWe found that dysmenorrhea is a very prevalent condition among young female students. Most frequent complaints were: lower abdomen and back pain, tiredness, breast tenderness, mood changes, and an increased appetite. Pain during menstruation indicated a significant positive association with neck, low back, and hip/thigh pain during the last 12 months. The results of the palpitation conclusively showed more active MTrPs in the rectus abdominis, quadratus lumborum and paraspinal muscles in women suffering from pain during menstruation than in those who were not in pain.ConclusionOur data provide an initial basis for the inclusion of a myofascial examination when evaluating women with dysmenorrhea.     

Walking meditation promotes ankle proprioception and balance performance among elderly women

BackgroundAge-related change of proprioception affects body balance among the elderly. Walking meditation (WM)—a mindfulness practice—involves focusing on leg movements while walking slowly, possibly improving brain processes for perception and balance adjustments. This study investigates the WM's effects on ankle proprioception and balance among the elderly.MethodsFifty-eight women aged 69.25 ± 6.06 were randomized into control (n = 29) and WM (n = 29) groups. The WM group engaged in 8 weeks of WM practice (30 min/day, 3 days/week). The absolute angular error of the ankle reposition test (AAE) was measured by an electrogoniometer. The balance performance was evaluated using the Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Functional Reach Test (FRT), and Timed Up and Go test (TUG). Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Bonferroni post hoc test and BBS with nonparametric statistics.ResultsAt baseline, the WM group's AAE, BBS, FRT, and TUG were 4.2 ± 1.6°, 51.3 ± 4.1 points, 21.7 ± 5.7 cm, and 11.1 ± 2.5 s, respectively, whereas those of the control group were 3.6 ± 2.0°, 51.0 ± 5.0 points, 21.6 ± 5.2 cm, and 10.2 ± 3.1 s, respectively. Post-training, WM group showed significant decrease in AAE (2.4 ± 0.9°) and displayed improvements in BBS, FRT, and TUG (55.4 ± 0.9 points, 29.1 ± 5.8 cm, and 8.1 ± 1.1 s, respectively) (p < 0.01). Conversely, the control group presented no change in AAE, significant decreases in BBS and FRT, and slower TUG (p < 0.01). No difference was found between WM and control groups at the baseline. However, post-training, WM group demonstrated significant improvements in AAE, BBS, FRT, and TUG as compared to the control group (p < 0.001).ConclusionsWM practice improved the balance and ankle reposition sense among the elderly. It can be used as an alternative form of training to promote balance and ankle proprioception. The results supported that balance performance worsens among the elders who do not engage in physical training.     

Feasibility of a Smartphone-Based Exercise Program for Office Workers With Neck Pain: An Individualized Approach Using a Self-Classification Algorithm

Objective

To explore the feasibility of a newly developed smartphone-based exercise program with an embedded self-classification algorithm for office workers with neck pain, by examining its effect on the pain intensity, functional disability, quality of life, fear avoidance, and cervical range of motion (ROM).

Use of Mobilization with Movement in the Treatment of a Patient with Subacromial Impingement: A Case Report

Abstract

Mobilization with movement (MWM) is a fairly new therapeutic technique commonly used by physical therapists. The purpose of this case report was to describe the use of MWM in the treatment of a 27-year old left-hand dominant male patient referred to physical therapy with a diagnosis of supraspinatus tendinopathy secondary to impingement. Interventions consisted of MWM and other manual therapy techniques, modalities, and therapeutic exercises. Outcome measures used included goniometric active range of motion (AROM) measurements and manual muscle tests of the shoulder, impingement tests, and the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) and Short Form-36 (SF-36) questionnaires. Specific outcome measures used to describe the response to MWM of the glenohumeral joint included the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) and goniometric measurement of abduction AROM. After the first MWM treatment (session 2/12), the 6/10 pre-application NPRS score during shoulder abduction was reduced to 3/10 post-application; however, abduction AROM did not improve (95°). At the final MWM treatment (session 6/12), the pre-application NPRS score during abduction was reduced from 3/10 to 0/10 post-application; abduction AROM increased from 130° to 175°. After 12 sessions, there was a decrease from moderate pain (7/10) to little or no pain (0-1/10) during active shoulder abduction; restricted (95°) to full shoulder abduction active range of motion (180°); and an improvement in the SPADI score from 45% to 8% with no pain or ADL activity difficulty scores >2. This case report indicates that MWM may be an effective treatment intervention for patients with subacromial impingement. Future research is needed to study the efficacy and mechanisms of this treatment technique.     

Reliability and Responsiveness of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures of Neck Disability to Physical Therapy: Comparison of the Copenhagen,Northwick Park,and Neck Bournemouth Questionnaires and the Neck Disability Index

ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to identify the external and internal reliability and responsiveness of the validated patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) of neck pain to a standardized regimen of physiotherapy administered acutely after mild whiplash injury using the clinically significant improvement components of the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) as the outcome measure.MethodsEighty-six patients with neck pain alone were referred for physiotherapy within 2 weeks of whiplash injury. They completed the Copenhagen, Northwick Park (NP), and Neck Bournemouth (NBQ) questionnaires and the Neck Disability Index (NDI) before starting and after treatment when they also completed the PGIC. Treatment comprised deep soft tissue massage, myofascial releases, muscle energy techniques, joint articulation and manipulation techniques, and a home exercise program. The duration of treatment was between 3 and 6 weeks. A PGIC of 6 or 7 was considered to be clinically significant improvement.ResultsThe external reliability of the PROMs was >0.7 and internal >0.87. All components of the PROMs contributed to the final score except headache in the Copenhagen and upper-limb dysesthesia in the NP. The most reliable questionnaire was the NBQ, which was significantly more responsive than the Copenhagen (P = .008). The NBQ was slightly more responsive than the NDI and NP. The NBQ and NDI were successfully completed more frequently than the NP and Copenhagen.ConclusionThe NP, NDI, and NBQ are all reliable and responsive measures of change after physiotherapy for neck pain after acute whiplash injury.     

Origin of neck pain and direction of movement influence dynamic cervical joint motion and pressure pain sensitivity

BackgroundPatients with neck pain normally showed alterations in cervical motion and pressure pain sensitivity. Cervical joints show scattered motions opposite to (anti-directional) the primary motion direction (pro-directional) during dynamic cervical flexion and extension. This study aimed to assess dynamic cervical joint motion and pressure pain sensitivity when pain originated from different cervical muscles which may have clinical relevance in diagnosis of impairments related with neck pain.MethodsFluoroscopic video recordings of cervical flexion and extension were collected from fifteen healthy subjects before and during hypertonic saline-induced pain in right multifidus and trapezius muscles. Cervical flexion and extension motions were divided into 10 epochs with respect to time. Pro-directional, anti-directional, and total joint motion were extracted across epochs as well as joint motion variability. Pressure pain thresholds (PPTs) were assessed bilaterally over C2/C3 and C5/C6 facet joints.FindingsCompared with baseline: 1) Multifidus muscle pain increased the C3/C4 anti-directional motion (P < 0.01), decreased the C6/C7 anti-directional motion (P < 0.05) during extension, and redistributed total joint motion between joints and between half ranges during flexion (P < 0.05). 2) Trapezius muscle pain decreased pro-directional motion (P < 0.05), anti-directional motion (P < 0.05), and joint motion variability (P < 0.05) during extension. 3) Trapezius and multifidus muscle pain increased the PPTs bilaterally over C2/C3 and on the left side of C5/C6 facet joints (P < 0.05).InterpretationThe direction of motion influenced the effects of experimental muscle pain on dynamic cervical joint kinematics, and deep muscle pain showed local effects on individual joints while superficial muscle pain showed global effects spread to all joints.     

Effect of Kinesiology Taping on Upper Torso Mobility and Shoulder Pain and Disability in US Masters National Championship Swimmers: An Exploratory Study

ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to observe changes in shoulder pain and upper-extremity functional movement after kinesiology taping (KT) in competitive swimmers.MethodsSeventy-six healthy participants competing in the US Masters Swimming 2017 National Championship participated in the study. Participants performed functional movement of shoulder flexion along with Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand index assessments for the shoulder before and 30 minutes after application of KT.ResultsA change in the functional movement assessment was observed after KT application when compared to the pre-KT application (33.56 ± 1.39 cm vs 35.35 ± 1.52 cm, P < .001). A statistical significant change for pain and disability scores of 2.17 was observed (12.29 ± 1.22 vs 10.12 ± 1.16, P < .01).ConclusionFor the participants in this study, KT changed shoulder pain and active functional movement scores significantly in swimmers.     

The Bournemouth Questionnaire for Neck Pain: Cross-cultural Adaptation,Reliability, and Validity of the Turkish Version

ObjectiveThe aim of this study was first to translate and culturally adapt the BQN, and then to investigate the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the BQN in Turkish individuals with chronic neck pain.MethodsThe English version of the BQN was translated into Turkish with permission from its authors. That translation was assessed using 85 participants with a mean age of 46.75 years who had chronic neck pain. At the same time, the participants were assessed sociodemographically and with the Neck Disability Index (NDI) and the Neck Pain and Disability Scale (NPAD). A test–retest procedure was performed with 62 participants who underwent a second assessment with the BQN within 24 hours of the first assessment, to test its reliability.ResultsInternal consistency was strong and all Cronbach alpha values were between 0.97 and 0.99. The BQN showed high test–retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient ˃ 0.92) for all domains. The total mean (± standard deviation) scores for the 3 questionnaires were as follows: BQN, 30.9 (± 11.18); NPAD, 48.16 (± 12.93); NDI, 17.85 (± 6.29). The results of the Turkish version of the BQN illustrated adequate external construct validity and sensitivity. A Turkish translation of the test has not previously been available for chronic pain.ConclusionThe BQN was successfully translated and culturally adapted into Turkish. The reliability and validity were tested against the NPAD and the NDI. The Turkish version of the BQN is multidimensional, short, practical, and suitable for use with individuals with neck pain.     

Multimodal physiotherapy treatment based on a biobehavioral approach for patients with chronic cervico-craniofacial pain: a prospective case series

The purpose of this prospective case series was to observe and describe changes in patients with chronic cervico-craniofacial pain of muscular origin treated with multimodal physiotherapy based on a biobehavioral approach. Nine patients diagnosed with chronic myofascial temporomandibular disorder and neck pain were treated with 6 sessions over the course of 2 weeks including: (1) orthopedic manual physiotherapy (joint mobilizations, neurodynamic mobilization, and dynamic soft tissue mobilizations); (2) therapeutic exercises (motor control and muscular endurance exercises); and (3) patient education. The outcome measures of craniofacial (CF-PDI) and neck disability (NDI), kinesiophobia (TSK-11) and catastrophizing (PCS), and range of cervical and mandibular motion (ROM) and posture were collected at baseline, and at 2 and 14 weeks post-baseline. Compared to baseline, statistically significant (p < 0.01) and clinically meaningful improvements that surpassed the minimal detectable change were observed at 14 weeks in CF-PDI (mean change, 8.11 points; 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.55 to 13.69; d = 1.38), in NDI (mean change, 5 cm; 95% CI: 1.74–8.25; d = 0.98), and in the TSK-11 (mean change, 6.55 cm; 95% CI: 2.79–10.32; d = 1.44). Clinically meaningful improvements in self-reported disability, psychological factors, ROM, and craniocervical posture were observed following a multimodal physiotherapy treatment based on a biobehavioral approach.     

Experimental cervical interspinous ligament pain altered cervical joint motion during dynamic extension movement

BackgroundAlthough the cervical interspinous ligament is a potential source of neck pain, the effects on cervical joint motion and pressure pain sensitivity has never been investigated. The understanding of the relationship will broaden our understanding of cervical biomechanics and improve diagnosis and treatment of neck pain.MethodsFluoroscopy videos of cervical flexion and extension movements and pressure pain thresholds over bilateral C2/C3 and C5/C6 facet joints were collected in fifteen healthy subjects before and after injections of hypertonic and isotonic saline in C4/C5 ISL. The videos were divided into 10 even epochs and the motion of individual joints during each epoch was extracted. Joint motion parameters including anti-directional motion, pro-directional motion, total joint motion and joint motion variability were extracted across epochs. Joint motion parameters and PPTs were compared before and after injection of hypertonic and isotonic saline separately.FindingsCompared with baselines: hypertonic saline injection 1) decreased anti-directional motion and joint motion variability at C4/C5 (P < 0.05) and increased at C2/C3 (P < 0.05) during extension; 2) increased total joint motion of C0/C1 during first half range (P < 0.05) and decreased during second half range of extension, and total joint motion of C2/C3 increased during second half range of extension (P < 0.05) and; 3) increased pressure pain thresholds over left C2/C3 facet joint (P < 0.01).InterpretationThe cervical interspinous ligament pain redistributed anti-directional motion between C4/C5 and C2/C3 during dynamic extension and decreased pressure pain sensitivity over the left C2/C3 facet joint.     

Recurrent neck pain patients exhibit altered joint motion pattern during cervical flexion and extension movements

BackgroundImpaired sensorimotor ability has been demonstrated in recurrent neck pain patients. It is however not clear if cervical joint motion and pressure pain sensitivity in recurrent neck pain patients are different from asymptomatic controls.MethodsCervical flexion and extension motions were examined by video-fluoroscopy and pressure pain thresholds were assessed bilaterally over C2/C3, C5/C6 facet joints and right tibialis anterior in eighteen recurrent neck pain patients and eighteen healthy subjects. Individual joint motion was analyzed by dividing fluoroscopic videos into 10 epochs. The motion opposite to the primary direction (anti-directional motion) and motion along with the primary direction (pro-directional motion) of each joint were extracted across epochs. Total joint motion was the sum of anti-directional and pro-directional motions. Joint motion variability was represented by the variance of joint motions across epochs.FindingsCompared to controls, recurrent neck pain patients showed: 1) decreased anti-directional motion at C2/C3 and C3/C4 (P < 0.05) and increased anti-directional motion at C5/C6 and C6/C7 (P < 0.05) during extension motion. 2) Increased overall anti-direction motion during flexion motion (P < 0.05). 3) Lower joint motion variability at C3/C4 during extension motion (P < 0.05).InterpretationRecurrent neck pain patients showed a redistribution of anti-directional motion between the middle cervical spine and the lower cervical spine during cervical extension and increased overall anti-directional motion during cervical flexion compared with healthy controls. The anti-directional motion was more sensitive to neck pain compared to other cervical joint motion parameters in the present study.     

A preliminary study comparing the use of cervical/upper thoracic mobilization and manipulation for individuals with mechanical neck pain

Objectives:Neck pain is routinely managed using manual therapy (MT) to the cervical and thoracic spines. While both mobilizations and manipulations to these areas have been shown to reduce neck pain, increase cervical range of motion, and reduce disability, the most effective option remains elusive. The purpose of this preliminary trial was to compare the pragmatic use of cervical and thoracic mobilizations vs. manipulation for mechanical neck pain.Methods:This trial included 20 patients with mechanical neck pain. Each patient was randomized to receive either mobilization or manipulation to both the cervical and thoracic spines during their plan of care. Within-group analyses were made with Wilcoxon signed-rank tests and between-group analyses were made with Mann–Whitney U.Results:There were no between-group differences for any of the dependent variables including cervical active range of motion (CAROM) (P = 0.18), deep cervical flexion (DCF) endurance (P = 0.06), numerical pain rating scale (NPRS) (P = 0.26), the neck disability index (NDI, P = 0.33), patient-specific functional scale (PSFS, P = 0.20), or the global rating of change (GROC) scale (P = 0.94). Within-group results were significant for all outcome variables (P<0.001) from initial evaluation to discharge for both groups.Discussion:These findings were consistent with other trials previously conducted that applied the MT techniques in a pragmatic fashion, but varied from previous trials where the treatment was standardized. A larger experimental study is necessary to further examine the differences between mobilization and manipulation for neck pain.