The Association of Improved Overall Survival with NSAIDs in Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Receiving Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

BackgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are commonly used in the management of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but response is suboptimal. Preclinical data suggest ICI efficacy may be enhanced with concomitant nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory (NSAID) medications.Patients and MethodsIn this retrospective study, the Veterans Health Administration Corporate Data Warehouse was queried for patients diagnosed with NSCLC and treated with ICI from 2010 to 2018. Concomitant NSAID use was defined as NSAID dispensation by a VA pharmacy within 90 days of the any ICI infusion. To mitigate immortal time bias, patients who started NSAIDs 60 or more days after ICI initiation were excluded from analysis. Survival was measured from start of ICI.ResultsWe identified 3634 patients with NSCLC receiving ICI; 2336 (64.3%) were exposed to concomitant NSAIDs. On multivariable analysis, NSAIDs were associated with better overall survival (HR = 0.90; 95% CI, 0.83-0.98; P = .010). When stratifying by NSAID type, diclofenac was the only NSAID with significant association with overall survival (HR = 0.75; 95% CI, 0.68-0.83; P < .001). Propensity score matching of the original cohort yielded 1251 patients per cohort balanced in characteristics. NSAIDs remained associated with improved overall survival (HR = 0.85; 95% CI, 0.78-0.92; P < .001).ConclusionThis study of Veterans with NSCLC treated with ICI demonstrated that concomitant NSAIDs are associated with longer OS. This may indicate that NSAIDs can enhance ICI-induced antitumor immunity and should prospectively validated.     

Peripheral Blood Biomarkers Associated with Clinical Outcome in Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Treated with Nivolumab

Objective

The aim of this study was to identify baseline peripheral blood biomarkers associated with clinical outcome in patients with NSCLC treated with nivolumab.

Checkpoint Inhibitors in Metastatic EGFR-Mutated Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer—A Meta-Analysis

IntroductionWe performed a meta-analysis to assess the role of immune checkpoint inhibitors as second-line therapy in EGFR-mutant advanced NSCLC.MethodsRandomized trials comparing immune checkpoint inhibitors against chemotherapy were identified. We retrieved the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for overall survival (OS) of the intention-to-treat population and EGFR mutation–defined subgroups. We used the fixed-effects inverse variance–weighted method to pool estimates of treatment efficacy. Statistical tests were two sided.ResultsIn the three included studies that compared immune checkpoint inhibitors (nivolumab [n = 292], pembrolizumab [n = 691], and atezolizumab [n =144]) against docetaxel (n = 776), immune checkpoint inhibitors significantly prolonged OS over that with docetaxel overall (n = 1903, HR = 0.68, 95% CI: 0.61–0.77, p < 0.0001) and in the EGFR wild-type subgroup (n = 1362, HR = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.58–0.76, p < 0.0001) but not in the EGFR-mutant subgroup (n = 186, HR = 1.05, 95% CI: 0.70–1.55, p < 0.81; treatment-mutation interaction p = 0.03).ConclusionIn EGFR-mutant advanced NSCLC, immune checkpoint inhibitors do not improve OS over that with docetaxel. Mechanisms of acquired resistance to first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy should be elucidated to guide selection of second-line treatment for these patients.     

Association Between Early Immune-related Adverse Events and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

IntroductionPrevious studies have described an association between immune-related adverse events (irAEs) and better outcomes in patients administered nivolumab for advanced non–small-cell lung cancer. However, the patients in previous studies were not stratified by potential predictive factors, such as programmed cell death ligand 1 status and treatment lines. Additionally, little is known of whether the timing and type of irAEs can inform the prediction of outcomes.Patients and MethodsWe prospectively investigated the association between irAEs and outcomes in the single-center cohort that included patients administered nivolumab in the second or later line of therapy. Subsequently, we confirmed these findings in a retrospective multicenter cohort that included patients with programmed cell death ligand 1 tumor proportion score of ≥ 50% who had received first-line pembrolizumab. The primary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS).ResultsIn the prospective cohort (n = 76), the median PFS was significantly longer for the patients experiencing irAEs within 2 weeks of beginning nivolumab compared with the PFS for those who did not (median, 5.0 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 2.1-8.6 months] vs. median, 2.0 months [95% CI, 1.9-2.5 months]; P = .046). The association was stronger with earlier (within 2 weeks) than with later (within 6 weeks) irAEs. In the retrospective cohort (n = 148), the median PFS was significantly longer for the patients with early irAEs (within 3 weeks) than for those without (median, not reached [95% CI, 5.9 months to not reached] vs. median, 6.9 months [95% CI, 4.2-9.7 months]; P = .04). Rash was common and a better predictor of outcomes in both cohorts.ConclusionOur results have provided firmer evidence of the association between the occurrence of irAEs and outcomes and suggest that early irAEs (especially rash) might better predict outcomes.     

Biomarkers of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer: Beyond PD-L1

Immunotherapy has markedly improved the survival rate of patients with non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and has introduced a new era in lung cancer treatment. Although some patients achieve durable responses to checkpoint blockade, not all experience such benefits, and some suffer from significant immunotoxicities. Thus, it is crucial to identify potential biomarkers suitable for screening the population that may benefit from immunotherapy. Based on the current clinical trials, the aim of the present study was to review the biomarkers for immune checkpoint inhibition that may have the potential to predict the response to immunotherapy in patients with lung cancer. A non-systematic literature review was done. We searched for eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from January 2015 to January 2021. The keywords included biomarkers, immunotherapy, immune checkpoint inhibition, programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1), and non–small cell lung cancer. Additional biomarkers beyond PD-L1 that have been shown to have predictive capacity include tumor mutational burden, microsatellite instability, lung immune prognostic index, gut microbiome, and certain alterations in genes (eg, STK11 deletion, LKB1 kinase mutation, MDM2/4 amplification) that confer immunoresistance. The biomarkers reviewed in this article could help us better select the appropriate immunotherapy treatment for patients with NSCLC.     

Safety and Efficacy of PD-1 Inhibitors Among HIV-Positive Patients With Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer

Introduction

Despite widespread administration of programmed death receptor 1 (PD-1) pathway inhibitors among individuals with NSCLC, little is known about the safety and activity of these agents among human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) – infected patients since this population has largely been excluded from immunotherapy clinical trials.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Rechallenge Efficacy in Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients

BackgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitor (ICPi) rechallenge could represent an attractive option in non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), yet no sufficient data supporting this strategy are available. This retrospective observational multicenter national study explored the efficacy of anti–programmed cell death 1 (PD-1)/programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) rechallenge in advanced NSCLC patients, looking for potential clinical features associated with greater outcomes.Patients and MethodsWe retrospectively collected data from 144 advanced NSCLC patients whose disease was rechallenged with ICPis after ≥ 12 weeks of discontinuation. The progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated from first or second ICPi initiation to disease progression (PFS1 and PFSR, respectively), death, or last follow-up (OS1, OSR), respectively.ResultsThe median (interquartile range) age was 63 (58-70) years. Most patients were male (67%) and smokers (87%). Most had adenocarcinomas (62%) and/or stage IV disease at diagnosis (66%). The best response at rechallenge was not associated with that under the first ICPi (P = 1.10⁻¹). The median (95% confidence interval) PFS1 and PFSR were 13 (10-16.5) and 4.4 (3-6.5) months, respectively. The median (95% confidence interval) OS1 and OSR were 3.3 (2.9-3.9) and 1.5 (1.0-2.1) years, respectively. Longer PFSR and OSR were found in patients discontinuing first ICPi because of toxicity or clinical decision, those not receiving systemic treatment between the two ICPis, and those with good Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status at rechallenge. Only performance status proved to affect outcomes at multivariate analysis.ConclusionPatients discontinuing first ICPi because of toxicity or clinical decision, those able to maintain a treatment-free period, and those with good performance status may be potential candidates for rechallenge.     

Brain Metastases in Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Up to 50% of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer will develop brain metastases at some point during their illness. These metastases cause a substantial burden in morbidity and mortality, which has motivated research and technological innovation over the past 2 decades. Surgery, radiotherapy, and systemic therapies have each played a role in management, with the greatest changes associated with the popularization of stereotactic radiosurgery. In this review, the evidence behind each modality used in the management of brain metastases for non–small-cell lung cancer patients is examined, and recommendations regarding the current standards of care and areas of future research focus are provided.     

The Current Role of Whole Brain Radiation Therapy in Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients

The incidence of brain metastases has increased in patients with NSCLC as a result of better systemic disease control and advances in imaging modalities. Whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) has been the mainstay treatment of multiple symptomatic brain metastases for years. A number of recent publications have questioned its place in the absence of a survival and quality of life benefit and the possible risk for long-term neurotoxicity. Omission or deferral of WBRT and strategies consisting of stereotactic radiosurgery or delivery of systemic therapies alone are being proposed more and more. However, critical analysis of the literature shows that WBRT still has relevant indications in well-selected patients. Within this review, we discuss the place of WBRT in the modern management of patients with NSCLC.     

Characteristics and Outcome of ROS1-Positive Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients in Routine Clinical Practice

Introduction

ROS1-rearranged NSCLC is classified as a distinct molecular subset of NSCLC with a therapeutic target. ROS1 rearrangement is most often identified in never-smokers with adenocarcinoma and EGFR and ALK receptor tyrosine kinase gene (ALK) wild type. Treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), which target the ROS1 kinase domain, is considered the standard of care. TKIs have been shown to have a robust and durable response. However, information regarding the clinical outcomes of TKI treatment, including brain metastasis, remains limited.

Outcomes in Patients With Non–small-cell Lung Cancer With Brain Metastases Treated With Pembrolizumab-based Therapy

BackgroundPatients with metastatic non–small-cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) and untreated brain metastases (BM) have been excluded from most trials of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Real-world evidence on efficacy and survival outcomes of ICIs in patients with BM is limited.Patients and MethodsWe conducted a single-center retrospective study of patients with mNSCLC treated with pembrolizumab with or without chemotherapy and compared progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) between patients with and without BM using Kaplan-Meier and Cox methodology. We also characterized systemic and intracranial objective response rate (ORR) and treatment details, including timing of cranial irradiation.ResultsBetween Augutst 2013 and December 2018, 570 patients with mNSCLC treated with pembrolizumab-based therapy were analyzed. Of 126 (22.1%) patients with BM, 96 (76.2%) had treated BM (local therapy prior to pembrolizumab), and 30 (23.8%) had untreated BM. Of patients with untreated BM, 17 (56.7%) underwent radiation within 30 days after pembrolizumab initiation. In the remaining 13 (43.3%) treated with pembrolizumab-based therapy alone, intracranial ORR was 36.4%. Patients with and without BM did not have significantly different systemic ORR (27.8% vs. 29.7%; P = .671), PFS (mPFS 9.2 vs. 7.7 months; P = .609), or OS (mOS 18.0 vs. 18.7 months; P = .966). Factors associated with improved survival on Cox analysis included female gender, performance status, adenocarcinoma histology, and first-line therapy.ConclusionsPatients with BM did not have inferior survival to patients without BM after treatment with pembrolizumab-based therapy. In the current era, BM may not automatically confer inferior survival, and should not exclude patients from receiving pembrolizumab-based therapy.     

Real-World Clinical Impact of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Patients With Advanced/Metastatic Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer After Platinum Chemotherapy

BackgroundThe real-world effect of anti-programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) therapies is unclear. We compared US patients who received second-line therapy for non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) before and shortly after US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of PD-L1 inhibitors.Patients and MethodsPatients in the Flatiron Health database (≥18 years; received first-line platinum therapy for advanced/metastatic NSCLC; ≥6 months of follow-up) were assessed before (“historical”: January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2013) and after (“current”: January 1, 2015 to May 31, 2017) FDA approval of anti–PD-L1 therapies for NSCLC. Index was start of second-line therapy. Baseline variables, treatment patterns, and overall survival (OS) were reported.ResultsA greater proportion of patients in the current cohort received second-line treatment than in the historical cohort (n = 4240 [57.0%] vs. n = 2357 [37.4%]); 48.8% [n = 2071] of the current second-line patients received anti–PD-L1 therapy. Current patients were more likely to receive second-line anti–PD-L1 therapy if they had poorer Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (≥2), had squamous histology, or had no epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), or ROS proto-oncogene 1 mutations. Median OS from index was higher in the current cohort (9.4 [95% confidence interval (CI), 8.9-9.9] months) than the historical cohort (7.3 [95% CI, 6.9-7.8] months). Adjusted for sex, race, ECOG performance status, disease stage, and Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog, EGFR, and ALK status, OS was improved by 15% in the current cohort.ConclusionContemporary patients are more likely to receive second-line therapy and have longer OS than patients who received care before approval of anti–PD-L1 therapies.     

Pneumonitis in Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Receiving Immune Checkpoint Immunotherapy: Incidence and Risk Factors

Checkpoint inhibitor pneumonitis (CIP) is an immune-related adverse event that can occur after initiation of anti–programmed death 1/programmed death ligand 1 immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy for the treatment of multiple malignancies, including NSCLC. However, the incidence of CIP has not been previously examined in a population that included both trial-enrolled and non–trial-enrolled patients with advanced NSCLC. Furthermore, risk factors and other clinical characteristics associated with CIP severity are not known. In this study, we retrospectively examined clinical characteristics, incidence, and risk factors for CIP in a cohort of 205 patients with NSCLC, all of whom received anti–programmed death 1/programmed death ligand 1 ICIs. Our results demonstrate a higher incidence of CIP (19%) than previously reported in clinical trials (3%–5%). Our data also suggest that tumor histologic type may be a risk factor for CIP development. We observed a wide range of time to onset of CIP (median 82 days), with high morbidity and mortality associated with higher-grade CIP regardless of degree of immunosuppression. Our data provide new insight into the epidemiology and clinical characteristics of CIP. Further studies are needed to increase CIP pharmacovigilance, improve risk stratification, and refine diagnostic algorithms for the diagnosis and management of this potential life-threatening complication of ICI therapy.     

Role of Local Ablative Therapy in Patients with Oligometastatic and Oligoprogressive Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer

Because of an improved understanding of lung cancer biology and improvement in systemic treatment, an oligometastatic state in which metastatic disease is present at a limited number of anatomic sites is being increasingly recognized. An oligoprogressive state, which is a similar but distinct entity, refers to disease progression at a limited number of anatomic sites, with continued response or stable disease at other sites of disease. Such an oligoprogressive state is best described in patients with NSCLC treated with molecular targeted therapy. Possible explanations for development of the oligoprogressive state include the presence of underlying clonal heterogeneity and extrinsic selection pressure due to the use of targeted therapy. Traditionally, local ablative therapy (LAT) has been limited to symptom palliation in patients with advanced NSCLC, but the presence of oligometastatic or oligoprogressive disease provides a unique opportunity to evaluate the role of LAT such as surgery, radiation therapy, radiofrequency ablation, or cryoablation. There is increasing evidence to support the clinical benefit of LAT in patients with NSCLC with limited metastatic disease and in selected individuals in whom resistance to targeted therapies develops. In the latter instance, adequate treatment of drug-resistant clones by LAT could potentially help in avoiding switching systemic therapy prematurely. This review focuses on the biology of oligometastatic and oligoprogressive NSCLC and describes the role of LAT in the treatment of these conditions.