Serum Antibody Against NY-ESO-1 and XAGE1 Antigens Potentially Predicts Clinical Responses to Anti–Programmed Cell Death-1 Therapy in NSCLC

IntroductionProgrammed cell death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors effectively treat NSCLC and prolong survival. Robust biomarkers for predicting clinical benefits of good response and long survival with anti–PD-1 therapy have yet to be identified; therefore, predictive biomarkers are needed to select patients with benefits.MethodsWe conducted a prospective study to explore whether serum antibody against NY-ESO-1 and/or XAGE1 cancer-testis antigens predicted primarily good clinical response and secondarily long survival with anti–PD-1 therapy for NSCLC. The serum antibody was detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and tumor immune microenvironment and mutation burden were analyzed by immunohistochemistry and next-generation sequencing.ResultsIn the discovery cohort (n = 13), six antibody-positive NSCLC cases responded to anti–PD-1 therapy (two complete and four partial responses), whereas seven antibody-negative NSCLC cases did not. Antibody positivity was associated with good response and survival, regardless of tumor programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression, mutation burden, and CD8⁺ T-cell infiltration. In the validation cohort (n = 75), 17 antibody-positive NSCLC cases responded well to anti–PD-1 therapy as compared with 58 negative NSCLC cases (objective response rate 65% versus 19%, p = 0.0006) and showed significantly prolonged progression-free survival and overall survival. Antibody titers highly correlated with tumor reduction rates. In the multivariate analysis, response biomarkers were tumor programmed death ligand 1 expression and antibody positivity, and only antibody positivity was a significantly better predictive biomarker of progression-free survival (hazard ratio = 0.4, p = 0.01) and overall survival (hazard ratio = 0.2, p = 0.004).ConclusionsOur results suggest that NY-ESO-1 and/or XAGE1 serum antibodies are useful biomarkers for predicting clinical benefits in anti–PD-1 therapy for NSCLC and probably for other cancers.     

Circulating MicroRNAs and Extracellular Vesicle–Containing MicroRNAs as Response Biomarkers of Anti–programmed Cell Death Protein 1 or Programmed Death-Ligand 1 Therapy in NSCLC

IntroductionAnti–programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) or programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) antibody therapy is a standard treatment for advanced NSCLC, and PD-L1 immunohistochemistry is used as a predictive biomarker for therapeutic response. However, because not all patients with NSCLC with high PD-L1 respond, and some patients with low PD-L1 expression exhibit durable benefit, more accurate predictive biomarkers are needed. Circulating microRNA (miRNA) and miRNA packaged in extracellular vesicles (EVs) are believed to play a role in intercellular communication among immune cells and between immune cells and tumor cells and may represent a good source of mechanism-related biomarkers.MethodsPretreatment plasma of patients with advanced NSCLC treated with single-agent anti–PD-1 or anti–PD-L1 antibody was used in this study. Plasma EVs were isolated using size-exclusion chromatography. Whole plasma and EV-containing RNAs were extracted. The miRNA profile was analyzed with a next-generation sequencing platform.ResultsSamples from 14 responders (patients who exhibited partial response or stable disease ≥6 mo) and 15 nonresponders (patients who exhibited progressive disease as per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) were analyzed. In total, 32 miRNAs (p = 0.0030–0.0495) from whole plasma and seven EV-associated miRNAs (p = 0.041–0.0457) exhibited significant concentration differences between responders and nonresponders. The results of some of these circulating miRNAs were validated in a separate cohort with eight responders and 13 nonresponders. The tumor PD-L1 level was also assessed using immunohistochemistry for patients involved in both cohorts.ConclusionsSpecific circulating miRNAs in whole plasma and plasma EVs are differentially expressed between responders and nonresponders and have potential as predictive biomarkers for anti–PD-1/PD-L1 treatment response.     

Prognostic Impact and Risk Factors of Immune-Related Pneumonitis in Patients With Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer Who Received Programmed Death 1 Inhibitors

IntroductionPneumonitis is one of the immune-related adverse events of programmed death 1 (PD-1) inhibitors that sometimes cause lethal outcomes. Although some recent reports have described PD-1 inhibitors as more effective in non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with immune-related adverse events than in those without, few data are available on the prognosis of those treated with PD-1 inhibitors who developed immune-related pneumonitis (IRP). Additionally, the robust risk factors of IRP have not been well elucidated.Patients and MethodsA retrospective review of patients with recurrent or advanced NSCLC who took a PD-1 inhibitor (nivolumab or pembrolizumab monotherapy) between January 2016 and March 2018 was undertaken. Radiologic findings such as unilateral infiltration were also defined as IRP as long as they were deemed relevant to PD-1 inhibitors.ResultsTwenty-seven (16%) of 170 patients developed IRP. Although 22 (81%) of 27 patients with IRP recovered with drug cessation with or without corticosteroid therapy, 8-week landmark analysis showed the overall survival after administration of the PD-1 inhibitor was significantly shorter in patients with IRP than in those without (8.7 vs. 23.0 months, P = .015). Patients with IRP tended to not receive next-line treatment and choose best supportive care after cessation of PD-1 inhibitor therapy. In the multivariate analysis, pembrolizumab (vs. nivolumab) and low serum albumin were independent risk factors for IRP.ConclusionDevelopment of IRP was correlated with poor prognosis in patients with NSCLC. Further study is necessary for establishing the best prediction and management strategies for IRP.     

A Comprehensive Analysis of Programmed Cell Death Ligand-1 Expression With the Clone SP142 Antibody in Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients

Background

Programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) and programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) have been identified as novel targets for immunotherapy, with anti–PD-1 therapy currently the standard treatment for non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients after the failure of first-line chemotherapy treatment. The recent phase II POPLAR and phase III OAK studies showed that atezolizumab, a representative PD-L1 inhibitor, exhibited a survival benefit compared with standard therapy in patients with NSCLC.

Efficacy and Safety of Anti–PD-1 Immunotherapy in Patients With Advanced NSCLC With BRAF,HER2, or MET Mutations or RET Translocation: GFPC 01-2018

IntroductionImmune-checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) efficacy in patients with NSCLC harboring molecular alterations remains poorly elucidated. This study was undertaken to determine ICI efficacy against BRAF-, HER2-, MET-, and RET-NSCLC in a real-world setting.MethodsIn this retrospective, multicenter study in ICI-treated BRAF-, HER2-, MET- or RET-NSCLCs, we analyzed clinical characteristics and outcomes: ICI-treatment duration, progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate, duration of response, and overall survival (OS).ResultsThere were 107 patients with NSCLC (mean age, 65.5 y) included from 21 centers: 37% were never-smokers, 54% were men, and 93% had adenocarcinoma. Among them, 44 had BRAF mutation (V600: 26), 23 had HER2 mutation, 30 had MET mutation, and nine had RET translocation. Programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) status was known for 70 patients and was greater than or equal to 1% in 34 patients. Before ICI, patients had received a median of one treatment line. Median duration of response, PFS, and OS were 15.4 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 12.6–not reached [NR]) months, 4.7 (95% CI: 2.3–7.4) months, and 16.2 (95% CI: 12.0–24.0) months, respectively, for the entire cohort. The response rates for BRAF-V600, BRAF–non-V600, HER2, MET, and RET-altered NSCLC were 26%, 35%, 27%, 36%, and 38%, respectively. For patients who were PD-L1 negative and those who were PD-L1 positive, PFS was 3.0 (95% CI: 1.2–NR) and 4.3 (95% CI: 2.1–8.5) months, respectively, and OS was 11.7 (95% CI: 4.1–NR) and 35.8 (95% CI: 9.0–35.2) months, respectively. Toxicities were reported in 28 patients (26%), including 11 patients (10%) with a grade greater than or equal to three.ConclusionsIn this real-world setting, ICI efficacy against patients with BRAF-, HER2-, MET-, or RET-NSCLC seemed close to that observed in unselected patients with NSCLC. Large prospective studies on these subsets of patients are needed.     

Analysis of Early Death in Japanese Patients With Advanced Non–small-cell Lung Cancer Treated With Nivolumab

Background

The increased risk for early death owing to anti-programmed cell death 1 inhibitors is a major disadvantage that requires special management. We evaluated the frequency, causes, and risk factors of early death during nivolumab treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in a Japanese clinical setting.

Programmed Cell Death Ligand 1 Expression in Non–Small-cell Lung Cancer Patients With Interstitial Lung Disease: A Matched Case-control Study

Background

Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) checkpoint inhibitors have demonstrated antitumor activity, and immunohistochemical analysis of PD-L1 expression has been used to identify the response in patients with non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Recently, considerable interest has ensued toward extending the benefit of these inhibitors to high-risk patients, such as those with NSCLC and interstitial lung disease (ILD). However, no studies have compared PD-L1 expression in NSCLC patients with and without ILD. Therefore, we conducted a case-control study to evaluate PD-L1 expression and stromal CD8⁺ lymphocyte density in these patients.

KRAS-specific Amino Acid Substitutions are Associated With Different Responses to Chemotherapy in Advanced Non–small-cell Lung Cancer

Background

Emerging data highlight different clinical behaviors according to KRAS amino acid substitutions (AASs) in patients with non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We aimed to evaluate whether different KRAS AASs were associated with different responses to chemotherapy.

Radiotherapy Alone vs. Radiochemotherapy in Patients With Favorable Prognosis of Clinical Stage IIIA Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

PurposeTo evaluate the outcome of radiotherapy (RT) vs. radiochemotherapy (RT-CHT) in patients with locally advanced, inoperable non–small-cell lung cancer who had a “favorable” prognosis (stage IIIA, Karnofsky performance score 70-100, no weight loss >5%).Patients and MethodsA total of 222 patients with these characteristics were among 600 patients enrolled into 5 prospective trials between 1988 and 1998, and were treated with either hyperfractionated RT alone (doses of 69.6 and 67.6 Gy when using 1.2 and 1.3 Gy twice a day, respectively) (n = 45) or the same hyperfractionated RT and concurrent CHT (n = 177), which consists of either carboplatin-etoposide (or paclitaxel-carboplatin.ResultsThe median times and 5-year overall survival, local progression-free survival, and the distant metastasis-free survival rates for all 222 patients were 33 months, 31 months, and not attained yet, respectively, and 36%, 43%, and 57%, respectively. RT-CHT was superior to RT alone in terms of both overall survival (median survival time, 38 vs. 21 months, respectively; 5-year, 41% vs. 16%, respectively; P < .001) and local progression-free survival (median time to local progression, 38 vs. 22 months, respectively, 5-year local progression-free survival, 48% vs. 23%, respectively; P < .001) but not the distant metastasis-free survival. The most frequent acute high-grade (>3) toxicity was esophageal and bronchopulmonary (8% each) and the most frequent late high-grade toxicity was esophageal (6%). RT-CHT caused only significantly more hematologic high-grade toxicity.ConclusionsRT-CHT achieved excellent results in this favorable patient population (median survival time, 38 months; 5-year survival, 41%) accompanied with very low toxicity. These results compare favorably with results of other similar studies when using combined RT and CHT, with or without surgery.