Outcomes in racial and ethnic minorities after revisional robotic-assisted metabolic and bariatric surgery: an analysis of the MBSAQIP database

BackgroundRobotic-assisted metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) is being performed with increased frequency in the United States, including for revisional MBS. However, little is known about perioperative outcomes between racial and ethnic cohorts after revisional robotic-assisted MBS.ObjectiveThe goal of our study was to determine if there are racial differences in outcomes after robotic-assisted revisional MBS.SettingUniversity Hospital, United States.MethodsUsing the 2015–2017 Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program database, we identified patients undergoing revisional MBS by a robotic-assisted approach. Univariate analyses were performed of unmatched and matched racial and ethnic cohorts, comparing black versus white patients and Hispanic versus white patients.ResultsOf 2027 robotic-assisted revisional MBS cases in the database, 1922 were included in our analysis, including 67%, 22.6%, and 10.4% white, black, and Hispanic patients, respectively. At baseline, there were some differences in patient characteristics between racial and ethnic cohorts. After propensity matching, outcomes between black and white patients were similar, except for higher rates of superficial surgical site infection among white patients (P = .05) and higher rates of organ space surgical site infection in black patients (P = .05). Outcomes were also similar between matched white and Hispanic patients, except for a higher bleeding in white patients (2% versus 0%, P = .04). There were no mortality or morbidity differences between racial and ethnic cohorts.ConclusionMorbidity and mortality after robotic-assisted revisional MBS do not seem to be mediated by race or ethnicity.     

Racial disparities in perioperative outcomes after bariatric surgery

BackgroundNonHispanic black patients bear a disproportionate burden of the obesity epidemic and its related medical co-morbidities. While bariatric surgery is the most effective treatment for morbid obesity, black patients access bariatric surgery at lower rates than nonHispanic white patients.ObjectivesTo examine racial differences before bariatric surgery and in short-term perioperative outcomes and complications, and the extent to which race is independently associated with perioperative morbidity and mortality.SettingMetabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program national database.MethodsData were extracted from the 2015 Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program Participant Use File. Multivariate analysis was used to identify differences in mortality, length of stay, readmission, and reintervention by race in patients undergoing laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass or laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SG).ResultsA total of 108,198 patients were included in the analysis. There were significant differences in perioperative disease burden. Black patients had a higher body mass index at the time they underwent surgery (laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: 48.0 versus 45.7 kg/m²; SG: 46.8 versus 44.9 kg/m²; P < .001). Black patients had significantly longer length of stay and higher rates of readmission in both the laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and SG groups. In the SG group, black patients had significantly higher 30-day mortality (.2% versus .1%, odds ratio = 3.613, 95% confidence interval 1.990–6.558, P < .001) and higher rates of reoperation or reintervention.ConclusionsWe found significant racial disparities in bariatric surgery outcomes, including higher mortality in black patients undergoing SG. The specific causes of these disparities remain unclear and must be the subject of future research.     

Unequal rates of postoperative complications in relatively healthy bariatric surgical patients of white and black race

BackgroundRacial disparities in postsurgical complications are often presumed to be due to a higher preoperative co-morbidity burden among patients of black race, although being relatively healthy is not a prerequisite for a complication-free postoperative course.ObjectivesTo examine the association of race with short-term postbariatric surgery complications in seemingly healthy patients.SettingsMetabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program database (2015–2018).MethodsWe studied a relatively healthy (American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status 1 or 2), propensity score–matched cohort of adult non-Hispanic black and non-Hispanic white bariatric surgery patients. We compared the risk-adjusted incidences of postoperative complications, serious adverse events, and measures of postoperative resource utilization across racial groups.ResultsWe identified 44,090 matched pairs of relatively healthy black and white bariatric surgery patients. Patients of black race were 72% more likely than those of white race to develop 1 or more postoperative complications (.7% versus .4%, respectively; odds ratio [OR], 1.72; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.32–2.24; P < .01). Measures of postbariatric resource utilization were significantly higher in patients of black race than those of white race, including unplanned reoperations (1.3% versus 1.0%, respectively; OR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.07–1.52; P = .01), unplanned readmissions (4.5% versus 3.0%, respectively; OR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.38–1.69; P < .01), unplanned interventions (1.6% versus 1.2%, respectively; OR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.16–1.60; P < .01), and extended hospital lengths of stay (51.2% versus 42.7%, respectively; OR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.36–1.46; P < .01).ConclusionEven among relatively healthy patients, race appears to be an important determinant of postbariatric surgery complications and resource utilization. Research and interventions aimed at narrowing the racial disparities in bariatric surgery outcomes may need to broaden the focus beyond the racial variation in the preoperative co-morbidity burden.     

Racial disparity in causes for readmission following bariatric surgery

BackgroundReadmission after bariatric surgery is not cost-effective and is a preventable quality metric within standardized practices. However, reasons for readmission among racial/ethnic bariatric cohorts are less explored and understood.ObjectiveOur study objective was designed to compare reasons for readmission among racial/ethnic cohorts of bariatric patients.SettingAcademic hospital.MethodsWe performed a retrospective analysis of the 2015–2018 MBSAQIP databases to identify Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG) cases. Regression analyses determined predictors of all-cause and bariatric-related readmissions. Reasons for readmission were compared between racial/ethnic cohorts using propensity score matching.ResultsMore than 550 000 RYGB and SG cases were analyzed. The readmission rate was 3%–4%. Black race, RYGB, robot-assisted approach, and numerous co-morbidities were independently associated with readmission (P <.05). In RYGB cases, black (versus white) patients were at decreased odds of leak-related (P < .001) and cardiovascular-related (P < .001) readmissions but at increased odds of readmissions related to renal complications (P < .001). Hispanic (versus white) patients had a higher likelihood of venous thromboembolism–related readmissions (P < .001). In SG cases, black (versus white) patients had a similar lower likelihood of readmission related to leaks or cardiovascular complications but higher odds of readmission related to renal complications (P < .001). Hispanic (versus black) patients had a higher likelihood of leak-related readmissions (P < .001).ConclusionReadmission reasons after bariatric surgery vary by race/ethnicity. Perioperative pathways to mitigate complications, including readmissions, should consider these disparate findings.     

Total Joint Arthroplasty Utilization After Orthopaedic Surgery Referral: Identifying Disparities Along the Care Pathway

BackgroundAlthough racial and ethnic disparities in total joint arthroplasty (TJA) have been thoroughly described, only a few studies have sought to determine exactly where along the care pathway these disparities are perpetuated. The purpose of this study was to investigate disparities in TJA utilization occurring after patients who had diagnosed hip or knee osteoarthritis were referred to a group of orthopaedic providers within an integrated academic institution.MethodsA retrospective, multi-institutional study evaluating patients with diagnosed hip or knee osteoarthritis was conducted between 2015 and 2019. Information pertaining to patient demographics, timing of clinic visits, and subsequent surgical intervention was collected. Utilization rates and time to surgery from the initial clinic visit were calculated by race, and logistic regressions were performed to control for various demographic as well as health related variables.ResultsWhite patients diagnosed with knee osteoarthritis were significantly more likely to receive total knee arthroplasty (TKA) than Black and Hispanic patients, even after adjusting for various demographic variables (Black patients: odds ratio [OR] = 0.63, 95% CI = 0.55-0.72, P = .002; Hispanic patients: OR = 0.69, 95% CI = 0.57-0.83, P = .039). Similar disparities were found among patients diagnosed with hip osteoarthritis who underwent total hip arthroplasty (THA; Black patients: OR = 0.73, 95% CI = 0.60-0.89, P = <.001; Hispanic patients: OR = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.53-0.98, P <.001). There were no differences in time to surgery between races (P > .05 for all).ConclusionIn this study, racial and ethnic disparities in TJA utilization were found to exist even after referral to an orthopaedic surgeon, highlighting a critical point along the care pathway during which inequalities in TJA care can emerge. Similar time to surgery between White, Black, and Hispanic patients suggest that these disparities in TJA utilization may largely be perpetuated before surgical planning while patients are deciding whether to undergo surgery. Further studies are needed to better elucidate which patient and provider-specific factors may be preventing these patients from pursuing surgery during this part of the care pathway.Level of EvidenceLevel IV.     

When is the best time to deliver behavioral intervention to bariatric surgery patients: before or after surgery?

BackgroundMany comprehensive bariatric surgery programs have implemented preoperative behavioral interventions for patients presenting with problematic eating behaviors in an effort to enhance postoperative weight loss and improve psychosocial adjustment. However, it is unknown whether these interventions are best delivered pre- or postoperatively. The purpose of this study was to determine when bariatric surgery patients are most receptive to a behavioral intervention, before or after surgery.MethodsA total of 32 pre- and postoperative patients were referred to a 10-week intervention designed to reduce eating behaviors associated with postoperative weight gain (e.g., loss of control while eating, grazing). The sample was 78.1% female and 84.4% white, with an average age of 49.43 ± 9.13 years and a body mass index of 44.22 ± 6.48 kg/m². Of the 32 patients, 21 were referred preoperatively and 11 were referred postoperatively (5.63 ± 2.91 months after surgery). These patients were tracked prospectively to determine whether pre- or postoperative patients were more likely to attend and complete the behavioral intervention.ResultsCompared with the preoperative patients, the postoperative patients were more likely to follow-up with their referral and initiate treatment [χ²(1) = 10.06, P = .002]. Of the postoperative patients, 100% attended the first intervention session compared with only 43% of preoperative patients. The postoperative patients also attended more intervention sessions [t(18) = 2.51, P = .02] and were more likely to complete the intervention [χ²(1) = 7.21, P = .007]. Only 14% of the preoperative referral patients completed the program compared with 91% of the postoperative patients.ConclusionComprehensive bariatric surgery programs ought to consider balancing the needs of the preoperative patients presenting with maladaptive eating behavior with the likelihood of them participating in a behavioral intervention before surgery.     

Weight loss trajectories and psychobehavioral predictors of outcome of primary and reoperative bariatric surgery: a 2-year longitudinal study

BackgroundLong-term behavioral and psychological aspects associated with weight outcomes after reoperative bariatric surgery have rarely been investigated.ObjectivesThis study sought (1) to identify differences in weight loss trajectories during the first 24 months in reoperative bariatric surgery (R group) and primary bariatric surgery (P group) and (2) to investigate pre- and postsurgery psychobehavioral predictors of weight loss and weight regain for both groups.SettingHospital center and university, Portugal.MethodsThis longitudinal study compared an R group (n = 157) and a P group (n = 216). Patients were assessed at presurgery and at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months postsurgery. Assessment included the Eating Disorder Examination–Questionnaire and Repetitive Eating Questionnaire diagnostic interviews and a set of self-report measures assessing eating disorder symptomatology, grazing, depression, anxiety, and impulsive behavior.ResultsThe P and R groups presented a similar trajectory for the percentage of total weight loss (%TWL) (β = 1.46, standard error = 1.96; Wald χ² = .55, P = .457) and weight regain (β = 1.66, standard error = 2.72; Wald χ² = .24, P = .622). No significant presurgery predictors of weight loss and weight regain were found for the P and R groups. Regarding postsurgery predictors, higher Eating Disorder Examination–Questionnaire scores (Wald χ²₍₁₎ = 6.88, P = .009) and grazing behavior (Wald χ²₍₁₎ = 8.30, P = .004) were associated with less %TWL for both groups. Belonging to the P group emerged as a significant predictor of more weight loss (Wald χ²₍₁₎ = 7.25, P = .007). Postsurgery anxiety predicted less %TWL in R group (Wald χ²₍₁₎ = 3.89, P = .043). Considering weight regain, higher postoperative disordered eating (global Eating Disorder Examination–Questionnaire; Wald χ²₍₁₎ = 4.66, P = .031) was associated with increased weight regain for the P and R groups.ConclusionsProblematic eating behaviors and psychological distress are significant predictors of poor weight outcomes for both groups.     

Bariatric surgery before and after kidney transplantation: long-term weight loss and allograft outcomes

BackgroundSevere obesity is frequently a barrier to kidney transplantation, and kidney transplant recipients often have significant weight gain following transplantation.ObjectivesThe goals of this study were to evaluate the long-term risks and benefits of bariatric surgery before and after kidney transplantation.SettingUniversity Hospital, United States.MethodsWe performed a retrospective cohort study of 43 patients who had pretransplantation bariatric surgery and 21 patients who had posttransplantation bariatric surgery from 1994 to 2017 with propensity-score matching to identify matched controls using national registry data.ResultsBody mass index at the time of transplantation was similar in patients who underwent bariatric surgery before versus after transplantation (32 versus 34 kg/m², P = .172). There was no significant difference in body mass index in the 5 years after bariatric surgery among patients who underwent bariatric surgery before versus after kidney transplantation (36 versus 32 kg/m², P = 0.814). Compared with matched controls, bariatric surgery before (n = 38) and after (n = 18) kidney transplantation was associated with a decreased risk of allograft failure (hazard ratio .31 [95% confidence interval .29–0.33] and .85 [95% confidence interval .85–.86] for pre- and posttransplant, respectively) and mortality (hazard ratio .57 [95% confidence interval .53–.61] and .80 [95% confidence interval .79–.82] for pre- and posttransplant, respectively).ConclusionsBariatric surgery before and after kidney transplantation results in similar maintenance of weight loss and improved long-term allograft survival compared with matched controls. Bariatric surgery appears to be a safe and reasonable approach to weight loss both before and after transplantation.     

Beyond insurance: race-based disparities in the use of metabolic and bariatric surgery for the management of severe pediatric obesity

BackgroundIt is unknown whether previously noted racial disparities in the use of metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) for the management of pediatric obesity could be mitigated by accounting for primary insurance.ObjectivesTo examine utilization of pediatric MBS across race and insurance in the United States.SettingRetrospective cross-sectional study.MethodsThe National Inpatient Sample was used to identify patients 12 to 19 years old undergoing MBS from 2015 to 2016, and these data were combined with national estimates of pediatric obesity obtained from the 2015 to 2016 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Severe obesity was defined as class III obesity, or class II obesity plus hypertension, dyslipidemia, or type 2 diabetes.ResultsA total of 1,659,507 (5.0%) adolescents with severe obesity were identified, consisting of 35.0% female, 38.0% white, and 45.0% privately insured adolescents. Over the same time period, 2535 MBS procedures were performed. Most surgical patients were female (77.5%), white (52.8%), and privately insured (57.5%). Black and Hispanic adolescents were less likely to undergo MBS than whites (odds ratio .50, .46, respectively; P < .001 both), despite adjusting for primary insurance. White adolescents covered by Medicaid were significantly more likely to undergo MBS than their privately insured counterparts (odds ratio 1.66; P < .001), while the opposite was true for black and Hispanic adolescents (odds ratio .29, .75, respectively; P < .001 both).ConclusionsPediatric obesity disproportionately affects racial minorities, yet MBS is most often performed on white adolescents. Medicaid insurance further decreases the use of MBS among nonwhite adolescents, while paradoxically increasing it for whites, suggesting expansion of government-sponsored insurance alone is unlikely to eliminate this race-based disparity.     

Three-year weight outcomes from a bariatric surgery registry in a large integrated healthcare system

BackgroundA registry was created for patients having procedures for weight loss from 2004 to the present time at a large integrated healthcare system. The objective of this study was to compare findings to the literature and national quality monitoring databases and present 3-year weight loss outcomes.MethodsPatients are passively enrolled in the registry with the following characteristics: a bariatric procedure for weight loss after January 1, 2004 and actively enrolled in the health plan at the time of surgery.ResultsCompared to national surgical quality databases, the registry (n = 20,296) has a similar proportion of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB; 58%), more vertical sleeve gastrectomy (SG; 40%), fewer banding (2%) procedures, more Hispanic patients (35%), and higher rates of 1 year follow-up (78%). RYGB patients lost more weight at every time point up to 3 years after surgery compared with SG patients (P<.001). Non-Hispanic white RYGB patients had a higher percent excess weight loss than non-Hispanic black (P<.001) and Hispanic (P<.001) RYGB patients. There were no differences between SG racial/ethnic groups in percent excess weight loss throughout the 3-year follow-up period.ConclusionWe are one of the first groups to publish comparison weight outcomes for RYGB and SG in a diverse patient population, showing that the responses to RYGB and not SG vary by race/ethnicity.     

Racial disparities in perioperative outcomes after metabolic and bariatric surgery: a case-control matched study

BackgroundMetabolic and bariatric surgery remains a safe and effective treatment for severe obesity. Ethnic minorities are disproportionately affected by obesity but are less likely to undergo metabolic and bariatric surgery. There remains controversy about outcomes among black patients compared with other ethnic groups after bariatric surgery.ObjectiveThe purpose of this case-control matched study using the largest clinically available bariatric data was to determine if there is racial disparity in perioperative outcomes after primary bariatric surgery.SettingsUniversity Hospital, United States.MethodsPatients who had a primary Roux-en-Y gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy in 2015 to 2016 were identified from the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program database. Case controlled–matched analyses were performed.ResultsWe compared 80,238 equally matched nonHispanic black and white patients. Operative length and hospital stay were longer in black patients. All-cause mortality was 2-fold higher in black patients (P = .003). Black patients had significantly higher rates of 30-day readmission and reintervention (P < .0001), pulmonary embolism (P =.0004), and aggregate renal (P = .01) and venous thromboembolic (P = .001) complications. Postoperative myocardial infarction, cardiac arrest, pulmonary embolism, and all-cause mortality were significant higher in black patients after sleeve gastrectomy, but not Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.ConclusionIn this study, pulmonary embolism and mortality were significantly higher in black patients after sleeve gastrectomy. Further studies are needed to determine causality.     

Racial disparities in bariatric perioperative outcomes among the elderly

BackgroundBariatric surgery outcomes in elderly patients have been shown to be safe, but with a higher rate of adverse outcomes compared with nonelderly patients. The impact of race on bariatric surgery outcomes continues to be explored, with recent studies showing higher rates of adverse outcomes in black patients. Perioperative outcomes in racial cohorts of elderly bariatric patients are largely unexplored.ObjectiveThe goal of this study was to compare outcomes between elderly non-Hispanic black (NHB) and non-Hispanic white (NHW) bariatric surgery patients to determine whether outcomes are mediated by race.SettingAcademic hospital.MethodsPatients who had a primary Roux-en-Y (RYGB) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG) in the period 2015–2018 and were at least 65 years of age were identified from the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program Participant Use Data File (MBSAQIP PUF). Selected cases were stratified by race. Outcomes were compared between matched racial cohorts. Multivariate regression analyses were performed to determine whether race independently predicted morbidity.ResultsFrom 2015 to 2018, 29,394 elderly NHW (90.8%) and NHB (9.2%) patients underwent an RYGB or SG. At baseline, NHB elderly patients had a higher burden of co-morbid conditions, resulting in higher rates of overall (7.7% versus 6.4%, P = .009) and bariatric-related (5.4% versus 4.1%, P = .001) morbidity. All outcome measures were similar between propensity-score-matched racial elderly bariatric patient cohorts. On regression analysis, NHB race remained independently correlated with morbidity (odds ratio [OR] 1.3, 95% CI 1.08–1.47, P = .003).ConclusionRYGB and SG are safe in elderly patient cohorts, with no differences in adverse outcomes between NHB and NHW patients, accounting for confounding factors. While race does not appear to impact outcomes in the elderly cohorts, NHB race may play a role in access.     

Factors affecting rejection of bariatric patients from an academic weight loss program

BackgroundTo determine the factors affecting rejection of bariatric candidates at an accredited, American College of Surgeons Level 1A, bariatric program. Bariatric surgery “Centers of Excellence” use a multidisciplinary team to screen patients for eligibility for surgery using insurance, medical history, psychological evaluation findings, and the surgeon assessment. Few studies have reported on the frequency or reasons for patients not being accepted for surgery among high-volume academic bariatric programs.MethodsFrom March to September 2007, 299 consecutive patients were accepted for evaluation into an accredited bariatric program and tracked for the incidence of rejection for weight loss surgery. The primary reasons for rejection included a lack of insurance coverage, being medically unfit, psychological or social inappropriateness, and a body mass index (BMI) that did not meet the cutoff (BMI <35 kg/m² or <40 kg/m² without co-morbid conditions).ResultsOf 299 screened patients, 90 (30.1%) were not accepted for surgery by the multidisciplinary team. The most frequent reason was the lack of insurance coverage (47.8%). Primary care physicians were the most common source of patient referral. All but 1 of the patients excluded because of an inadequate BMI (n = 13) had been referred by friends, co-workers, or themselves from information received from the Internet or television.ConclusionApproximately one third of screened patients were not accepted for surgery by an academic bariatric program. Self- or social referral appeared to correlate with rejection because the BMI did not meet the criteria for surgery. This suggests inadequate information among social referral networks and/or in the media. Long-term follow-up will determine the health outcomes of patients not cleared for weight loss surgery.     

Is bariatric surgery safe in patients with history of cardiac revascularization?

BackgroundThe number of patients undergoing bariatric surgery with prior cardiac revascularization (CR) is rising. However, scarce data exist regarding the safety of bariatric procedures in these patients.ObjectivesThe aim of this study is to compare postoperative cardiovascular and noncardiovascular outcomes among patients with different CR procedures.SettingAcademic hospital, United States.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed 2884 patients undergoing bariatric surgery from 2009–2018. Patients with prior CR were included and stratified into groups: coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), percutaneous coronary intervention with stent (PCI), and CABG + PCI. We described patient demographic characteristics, co-morbidities, smoking status, history of myocardial infarction, type of bariatric surgery, number of vessels grafted/stents, time from CR to bariatric surgery, length of stay, and cardiovascular and noncardiovascular 30-day outcomes. A control group composed of patients without prior CR undergoing bariatric surgery was used to compare the rate of complications to the total patients with prior CR. For continuous and categorical variables, t test and χ² tests were performed, respectively.ResultsWe identified 76 patients with prior CR undergoing bariatric surgery. The mean patient age was 61.4 ± 7.9 years, the mean body mass index was 41.7 ± 6.5 kg/m², and male sex was predominant (71.1%). Among these, 50% (n = 38) had PCI, 39.4% (n = 30) had CABG, and 10.5% (n = 8) had CABG + PCI. Early cardiovascular complications rate included ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (n = 2), pulmonary embolism (n = 1), supraventricular arrhythmia (n = 2), ventricular arrhythmia (n = 1), and pacemaker/defibrillator-insertion (n = 1). The overall rate of cardiovascular and noncardiovascular complications was 9.2% (n = 7) and 10.5% (n = 8) during the 30 days. Mortality rate was 0%. Comparison of rate of complications between groups did not show any statistical difference; no significant difference was found when comparing patients with prior CR to the 76 patients in the control group (P > .05).ConclusionsAlthough revascularized individuals have severe co-morbidities and are high-risk patients, bariatric surgery remains safe in this population when outcomes are compared with bariatric patients without prior CR.     

Trends in risk factors for readmission after bariatric surgery 2015–2018

BackgroundReadmission after bariatric surgery is multifactorial. Understanding the trends in risk factors for readmission provides opportunity to optimize patients prior to surgery identify disparities in care, and improve outcomes.ObjectivesThis study compares trends in bariatric surgery as they relate to risk factors for all-cause readmission.SettingMetabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) participating facilities.MethodsThe Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program database was used to analyze 760,076 bariatric cases from 854 centers. Demographics and 30-day unadjusted outcomes were compared between laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB), sleeve gastrectomy (LSG), and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) performed between 2015 and 2018. A multiple logistic regression model determined predictors of readmission.ResultsA total of 574,453 bariatric cases met criteria, and all-cause readmission rates decreased from 4.2% in 2015 to 3.5% in 2018 (P < .0001). The percentage of non-Hispanic Black adults who underwent bariatric surgery increased from 16.7% of the total cohort in 2015 to 18.7% in 2018 (P < .0001). The percentage of Hispanic adults increased from 12.1% in 2015 to 13.8% in 2018 (P < .0001). The most common procedure performed was the LSG (71.5%), followed by RYGB (26.9%) and 1.6% LAGB (1.6%) (P < .0001). Men were protected from readmission compared with women (odds ratio [OR]: .87; 95% confidence interval [CI]: .84–.90). Non-Hispanic Black (OR: 1.52; 95% CI: 1.47–1.58)] and Hispanic adults (OR: 1.14; 95% CI: 1.09–1.19) were more likely to be readmitted compared with non-Hispanic White adults. LSG (OR: 1.27; 95% CI: 1.10–1.48) and RYGB (OR: 2.24; 95% CI: 1.93–2.60) were predictive of readmission compared with LAGB.ConclusionReadmission rates decreased over 4 years. Women, along with non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic adults, were more likely to be readmitted. Future research should focus on gender and racial disparities that impact readmission.     

Prior bariatric surgery in COVID-19–positive patients may be protective

BackgroundPatients infected with novel COVID-19 virus have a spectrum of illnesses ranging from asymptomatic to death. Data have shown that age, sex, and obesity are strongly correlated with poor outcomes in COVID-19–positive patients. Bariatric surgery is the only treatment that provides significant, sustained weight loss in the severely obese.ObjectivesExamine if prior bariatric surgery correlates with increased risk of hospitalization and outcome severity after COVID-19 infection.SettingUniversity hospitalMethodsA cross-sectional retrospective analysis of a COVID-19 database from a single, New York City–based, academic institution was conducted. A cohort of COVID-19–positive patients with a history of bariatric surgery (n = 124) were matched in a 1:4 ratio to a control cohort of COVID-19–positive patients who were eligible for bariatric surgery (BMI ≥40 kg/m² or BMI >35 kg/m² with a co-morbidity at the time of COVID-19 diagnosis) (n = 496). A comparison of outcomes, including mechanical ventilation requirements and deceased at discharge, was done between cohorts using χ² test or Fisher’s exact test. Additionally, overall length of stay and duration of time in intensive care unit (ICU) were compared using Wilcoxon rank sum test. Conditional logistic regression analyses were done to determine both unadjusted (UOR) and adjusted odds ratios (AOR).ResultsA total of 620 COVID-19–positive patients were included in this analysis. The categorization of bariatric surgeries included 36% Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB, n = 45), 36% laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB, n = 44), and 28% laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG, n = 35). The body mass index (BMI) for the bariatric group was 36.1 kg/m² (SD = 8.3), which was significantly lower than the control group, 41.4 kg/m² (SD = 6.5, P < .0001). There was also less burden of diabetes in the bariatric group (32%) compared with the control group (48%) (P = .0019). Patients with a history of bariatric surgery were less likely to be admitted through the emergency room (UOR = .39, P = .0001), less likely to require a ventilator during the admission (UOR=.42, P = .028), had a shorter length of stay in both the ICU (P = .033) and overall (UOR = .44, P = .0002), and were less likely to be deceased at discharge compared with the control group (OR = .42, P = .028).ConclusionA history of bariatric surgery significantly decreases the risk of emergency room admission, mechanical ventilation, prolonged ICU stay, and death in patients with COVID-19. Even when adjusted for BMI and the co-morbidities associated with obesity, patients with a history of bariatric surgery still have a significant decrease in the risk of emergency room admission.     

Survival benefit in bariatric surgery kidney recipients may be mediated through effects on kidney graft function and improvement of co-morbidities: A case-control study

BackgroundData on the benefits of bariatric surgery for morbid obesity among kidney transplant recipients are scarce.ObjectiveTo examine the effect of bariatric surgery on graft function and survival and on obesity-related co-morbidities.SettingUniversity hospital.MethodsThis case-control study used retrospectively collected data of all kidney recipients who underwent bariatric surgery in our institution between November 2011 and August 2016 (n = 30, 11 females). Nonbariatric operated kidney recipients matched for age, sex, and time elapsed since transplantation served as controls (n = 50, 23 females). Main outcomes were renal function, graft loss events, mortality, and obesity-related co-morbidities.ResultsThe mean follow-up duration was 2.4 ± 1.3 years for both groups. At final follow-up, there was an increase in estimated glomerular filtration rates for the bariatric surgery group, and a decrease for the controls (13.4 ± 19.9 and ?3.9 ± 15.8 mL/min/1.73 m², respectively, P < .001). The chronic kidney disease classification improved in 9 bariatric surgery group patients and in 6 controls (P = .1). Two patients in the bariatric surgery group and 6 controls died. Total death or graft function loss during the follow-up was 6.7% and 16.7%, respectively (P = .3). The total numbers of co-morbidities and medications were lower in the bariatric surgery patients (?.7 and ?2, respectively) and higher in the controls (+.3 and +1.1; P < .001) at study closure.ConclusionsThere was an improvement in renal function, graft survival, and obesity-related co-morbidities among kidney transplant recipients who underwent bariatric surgery compared with those who did not. These findings support bariatric surgery in this population and warrant prospective studies.     

Impact of activated vitamin D and race on survival among hemodialysis patients

Contrary to most examples of disparities in health outcomes, black patients have improved survival compared with white patients after initiating hemodialysis. Understanding potential explanations for this observation may have important clinical implications for minorities in general. This study tested the hypothesis that greater use of activated vitamin D therapy accounts for the survival advantage observed in black and Hispanic patients on hemodialysis. In a prospective cohort of non-Hispanic white (n = 5110), Hispanic white (n = 979), and black (n = 3214) incident hemodialysis patients, higher parathyroid hormone levels at baseline were the primary determinant of prescribing activated vitamin D therapy. Median parathyroid hormone was highest among black patients, who were most likely to receive activated vitamin D and at the highest dosage. One-year mortality was lower in black and Hispanic patients compared with white patients (16 and 16 versus 23%; P < 0.01), but there was significant interaction between race and ethnicity, activated vitamin D therapy, and survival. In multivariable analyses of patients treated with activated vitamin D, black patients had 16% lower mortality compared with white patients, but the difference was lost when adjusted for vitamin D dosage. In contrast, untreated black patients had 35% higher mortality compared with untreated white patients, an association that persisted in several sensitivity analyses. In conclusion, therapy with activated vitamin D may be one potential explanation for the racial differences in survival among hemodialysis patients. Further studies should determine whether treatment differences based on biologic differences contribute to disparities in other conditions.     

Reproductive health counseling,attitudes, and practices: a cross-sectional survey among bariatric surgeons

BackgroundWomen of childbearing age constitute a substantial proportion of patients who undergo weight loss procedures. However, little is known regarding family planning knowledge, attitudes, and practices among bariatric surgeons.ObjectivesWe explored the reproductive health and contraceptive practices among bariatric surgeons.SettingA national society of bariatric surgeons.MethodsA cross-sectional study. Anonymous surveys were sent to all members of the Israeli Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery.ResultsThe Israeli Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery survey elicited a response rate of 96% (n = 48). Most (89.6%, n = 43) considered female reproductive health perioperative counseling very important, and the majority of respondents (66.7%, n = 32) felt comfortable discussing these issues. Nevertheless, only 54.2% (n = 25) reported routinely having family planning and pregnancy conversations with their patients. There was a general awareness that women should delay conception after surgery; however, only a minority of bariatric surgeons consistently either recommended the use of contraception after surgery (39.6%, n = 19) or referred patients for contraceptive advice (25.0%, n = 12). Most (81.3%, n = 39) practitioners reported not having accurate knowledge of contraception and felt that collaboration with other bariatric healthcare providers would provide patients with optimal reproductive-health counseling.ConclusionsBariatric surgeons acknowledged the importance of reproductive healthcare and the need to delay conception among women undergoing bariatric surgery. However, they inconsistently addressed family planning and contraceptive issues and reported lack of accurate knowledge in this regard. This highlights the need for multidisciplinary collaboration between bariatric healthcare providers to improve reproductive and contraceptive care in these patients.     

Impact of a preoperative low-calorie diet on liver histology in patients with fatty liver disease undergoing bariatric surgery

BackgroundA low-calorie diet (LCD) before bariatric surgery has been shown to reduce liver volume and facilitate ease of operation. It is estimated that 75%–100% of individuals undergoing bariatric surgery have nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD).ObjectivesWe aimed to investigate how an LCD affects liver histology in the setting of NAFLD.SettingUniversity Hospital, United States.MethodsForty intraoperative liver specimens were analyzed histologically as follows: 20 with and 20 without a preoperative 2-week, 1200 kcal/d LCD. Weight was measured prediet, at surgery, and 6 months after surgery. NAFLD activity score was used to grade liver histology at surgery. The NAFLD activity score scores steatosis, lobular inflammation, hepatocellular ballooning, and fibrosis.ResultsThe non-LCD group (n = 20) had mean weight at surgery of 136.1 ± 24.1 kg. The LCD group (n = 20) had initial mean weight of 128.6 ± 25.4 kg, with presurgical weight loss of 3.43 kg (range, 0–9.3 kg), mean change in body mass index 1.24 kg/m² (2.66% total weight loss) on an LCD. The LCD group had significantly less steatosis (P = .02), fewer foci of lobular inflammation (P = .01), and less hepatocellular ballooning (P = .04) compared with the non-LCD group; with no difference in degree of fibrosis. Fewer patients in the LCD group had nonalcoholic steatohepatitis with ballooning (P = .04). Weight loss on an LCD before bariatric surgery was predictive of weight loss 6 months after surgery (P = .026).ConclusionsA 2-week LCD before bariatric surgery is associated with significant improvement in steatosis, inflammation, and hepatocellular ballooning in NAFLD. Among LCD patients, preoperative weight loss was associated with improved 6-month weight loss and liver function.