Biochemical outcomes and predictive factors by risk group after permanent iodine-125 seed implantation: Prospective cohort study in 2,316 patients

PurposeTo evaluate the biochemical freedom from failure (bFFF) by risk group and treatment modality and the predictive factors of bFFF by risk group in patients with prostate cancer undergoing permanent seed implantation (PI) with or without external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) in a nationwide prospective cohort study (Japanese Prostate Cancer Outcome Study of Permanent Iodine-125 [I-125] Seed Implantation) in Japan during the first 2 years.Methods and MaterialsThe analyses included 2,316 participants in 42 institutions; bFFF was evaluated using the Phoenix definition and calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method, and the Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify the factors associated with bFFF.ResultsMedian followup period was 60.0 months. The 5-year bFFF rates in all patients, 1,028 low-risk patients, 1,114 intermediate-risk patients, and 133 high-risk patients were 93.6%, 94.9%, 92.7%, and 91.1%, respectively. The 5-year bFFF rates in the PI group and EBRT combination therapy group were 93.7% and 93.3%, respectively. In a multivariate analysis, younger age, higher Gleason score (GS), higher percent positive biopsies (%PB), and lower prostate V₁₀₀ (p = 0.0012, 0.0030, 0.0026, and 0.0368) in all patients; younger age, higher pretreatment prostate-specific antigen, and lower prostate V₁₀₀ (p = 0.0002, 0.0048, and 0.0012) in low-risk patients; higher GS, higher %PB, and no hormonal treatment (p = 0.0005, 0.0120, and 0.0022) in intermediate-risk patients; and higher GS and higher %PB (p = 0.0329 and 0.0120) in high-risk patients were significantly associated with bFFF.ConclusionsPI with or without EBRT resulted in excellent short-term biochemical outcomes in all risk groups, especially in high-risk patients. Age, pretreatment prostate-specific antigen, and prostate V₁₀₀ in low-risk patients; GS, %PB, and hormonal treatment in intermediate-risk patients; and GS and %PB in high-risk patients were independently affected bFFF.     

Dosimetric and radiobiological investigation of permanent implant prostate brachytherapy based on Monte Carlo calculations

PurposePermanent implant prostate brachytherapy plays an important role in prostate cancer treatment, but dose evaluations typically follow the water-based TG-43 formalism, ignoring patient anatomy and interseed attenuation. The purpose of this study is to investigate advanced TG-186 model-based dose calculations via retrospective dosimetric and radiobiological analysis for a new patient cohort.Methods and MaterialsA cohort of 155 patients treated with permanent implant prostate brachytherapy from The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre is considered. Monte Carlo (MC) dose calculations are performed using tissue-based virtual patient models. Dose–volume histogram (DVH) metrics (target, organs at risk) are extracted from 3D dose distributions and compared with those from calculations under TG-43 assumptions (TG43). Equivalent uniform biologically effective dose and tumor control probability are calculated.ResultsFor the target, D₉₀ (V₁₀₀) is 136.7 ± 20.6 Gy (85.8% ± 7.8%) for TG43 and 132.8 ± 20.1 Gy (84.1% ± 8.2%) for MC; D₉₀ is 3.0% ± 1.1% lower for MC than TG43. For organs at risk, MC D_1cc = 104.4 ± 27.4 Gy (TG43: 106.3 ± 28.3 Gy) for rectum and 80.8 ± 29.7 Gy (TG43: 78.4 ± 28.4 Gy) for bladder; D_1cc = 185.9 ± 30.2 Gy (TG43: 191.1 ± 32.0 Gy) for urethra. Equivalent uniform biologically effective dose and tumor control probability are generally lower when evaluated using MC doses. The largest dosimetric and radiobiological discrepancies between TG43 and MC are for patients with intraprostatic calcifications, for whom there are low doses (cold spots) in the vicinity of calcifications within the target, identified with MC but not TG43.ConclusionsDVH metrics and radiobiological indices evaluated with TG43 are systematically inaccurate by upward of several percent compared with MC patient-specific models. Mean cohort DVH metrics and their MC:TG43 variances are sensitive to patient cohort and clinical practice, underlining the importance of further retrospective MC studies toward widespread clinical adoption of advanced model-based dose calculations.     

Manual vs. automated implantation of seeds in prostate brachytherapy: Oncologic results from a single-center study

PurposeThe objective of this study was to study survival and tolerance of prostate cancer patients treated with ¹²⁵I permanent interstitial brachytherapy by automated vs. manual implantation of seeds.Methods and MaterialsBetween 2002 and 2010, 349 selected patients were treated with ¹²⁵I brachytherapy by the same team: from 2002 to April 2005, 65 patients with linked seeds and then 284 patients treated using Nucletron First System automated implantation. We analyzed biochemical recurrence-free survival (bRFS) rates and toxicities (univariate and multivariate analyses).ResultsTwo hundred seventy-seven (79.4%) and 69 patients (19.8%) with low- and intermediate-risk disease were treated, respectively (median follow-up: 64 months). The 5-year bRFS rate was 93.1% (95% confidence interval 89.3–95.6) for the entire cohort. The 5-year bRFS rates were 93.4% and 91.7% for patients with low- and intermediate-risk disease, respectively (p = 0.42). In univariate and multivariate analyses, there was no statistically significant difference in the 5-year bRFS rate depending on the implantation technique (93.1% vs. 91.8%, respectively, for automated and linked seeds; p = 0.53). In univariate analysis, only D₉₀ prostate (dose delivered to 90% of the prostate) <140 Gy (p = 0.01), lack of prostate-specific antigen bounce (p = 0.008), and nadir prostate-specific antigen >0.11 (p = 0.01) were predictive factors for bRFS. We observed Grade 3 urethritis in 7 patients (2%), urinary incontinence in 2 patients (0.7%), and Grade 4 proctitis in 2 patients (0.7%).ConclusionsIn this large single-center series, brachytherapy for selected localized prostate cancer achieved excellent rates of biochemical control at 5 years (93.1%) with an acceptable toxicity profile, irrespective of the implantation technique used.     

Influence of transitioning of planning techniques in high-dose-rate brachytherapy monotherapy for clinically localized prostate cancer from two- to three-dimensional planning

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to examine the influence of transitioning treatment planning techniques in high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy monotherapy for localized prostate cancer.Methods and MaterialsWe compared 113 patients treated with initial two-dimensional treatment planning (2D: 74% received 54 Gy/nine fractions) to 240 patients treated with three-dimensional planning (3D: 70 CT image-guided 3D [CT-3D]: 84% 45.5 Gy/seven fractions and 170 MRI image-guided [MRI-3D]: 87% received 49 Gy/nine fractions).ResultsThe actuarial 5-year biochemical failure-free survival rates for 2D and 3D planning were 88.4% and 95.1% (p = 0.0285 between 2D and 3D) (89.4% in CT-3D and 97.5% in MRI-3D), respectively; the rates for 2D and 3D planning were not available and 100% in the low-risk group (100% and 100%), 97.7% and 94.5% (p = 0.7626) (85.1% and 100%) in the intermediate-risk group, and 82.5% and 94.4% (p = 0.0507) (93.8% and 94.7%) for the high-risk group. Late gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity Grade 1, Grade 2, and Grade 3 was found in 13%, 4%, and 1% in 2D, whereas 8%, 2%, and 0% in 3D group (p = 0.0699), respectively. 3D decreased GI toxicity Grade 2 ≤ than 2D (19% and 10%, p = 0.0169). Late genitourinary toxicity Grade 1, Grade 2, and Grade 3 was 21%, 12%, and 3% for 2D and 32%, 18%, and 3% for 3D, respectively (p = 0.0217).ConclusionsThe 3D technique has the potential to reduce GI toxicity and improve biochemical control rate compared to 2D planning, whereas 3D resulted in increased mild genitourinary toxicity.     

Intraprostatic calcification and biochemical recurrence in men treated with cesium-131 prostate brachytherapy

PURPOSEBaseline intraprostatic calcification (IC) has been shown to be associated with a higher rate of biochemical recurrence (BCR) in men treated with iodine-125 prostate brachytherapy (PB). We evaluated this association in a cohort of men treated with cesium-131 PB.METHODS AND MATERIALSWe retrospectively reviewed the charts of all low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients treated with cesium-131 PB +/- external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) at our institution from 2/2011 to 7/2018. Patients with < 24 months of follow up or those who received androgen deprivation therapy were excluded. Baseline IC status (defined as one or more ICs ≥ 5 mm) was determined on post-PB CT scans. Cox analysis was used to assess predictors of BCR and Kaplan–Meier survival curves were calculated.RESULTSTwo hundred and sixteen low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients treated with cesium-131 PB +/- EBRT were included. Median follow up was 56.9 months (range 24.1–111.4). Overall, 76 (35.2%) patients had baseline IC and 140 (64.8%) did not. Baseline disease characteristics did not differ significantly between groups. On univariate Cox analysis, only risk group (p = 0.047) and initial PSA (p = 0.016) were significant predictors of BCR, whereas baseline IC was not (p = 0.11). The 5-year BCR-free survival in patients with versus without baseline IC was 97.7% versus 93.8% (p = 0.405), respectively.CONCLUSIONSIn a cohort of low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients treated with cesium-131 PB, the rate of BCR in men with baseline IC was low and baseline IC was not associated with a higher risk of BCR.     

HDR brachytherapy as monotherapy for prostate cancer: A systematic review with meta-analysis

PurposeThe effectiveness and safety of high dose brachytherapy as monotherapy (HDR-BRT-M) in prostate cancer is limited to retrospective studies. We performed a meta-analysis to summarize existing data and identify trends in biochemical recurrence-free survival (bRFS) and toxicity after HDR-BRT-M in patients with prostate cancer.Methods and MaterialsRetrospective, prospective, or randomized clinical trials were identified on electronical databases through June 2020. We followed the PRISMA and MOOSE guidelines. A meta-regression analysis was performed to assess if there is a relationship between moderator variables and bRFS. A p-value < 0.05 was considered significant.ResultsFourteen studies with a total of 3534 patients treated were included. The cumulative size of the bRFS at 5 years was 0.92 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.48–0.61). The five-year bRFS for low, intermediate, and high risk was 97.5% (95% CI 96–98%), 93.5% (95% CI 91–96%), and 91% (95% CI 88–93%), respectively. The total biological effective dose (BED) (p = 0.02), the BED per fraction (p = 0.001), androgen deprivation therapy usage (p = 0.04), and the number of fractions of HDR-BRT-M (p = 0.024) were significantly associated with bRFS rate. The rate of late Grade 2/3 or > genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicity was 22.4% (95% CI 9–35,2%)/1.4% (95% CI 0.8–2.1%) and 2.7% (95% CI 0–6.8%) and 0.2% (95% CI 0.1%–0.4%), respectively.ConclusionsHDR-BRT-M is safe with excellent rates of bRFS for all risk groups. The total BED, the BED per fraction, and number of fractions were the key factors associated with the biochemical control. These data can be useful to choose the size and number of BRT fractionation.     

Impact of MRI-based postimplant dosimetric assessment in prostate brachytherapy using contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images

PurposeTo compare contrast-enhanced T1-weighted (CE-T1WI) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with computed tomography (CT) for postimplant dosimetry and seed recognition in prostate brachytherapy.Methods and MaterialsA total of 245 patients who received ¹²⁵I prostate brachytherapy with or without external beam radiotherapy were enrolled. For postimplant analysis, CT and MRI scans were obtained at 1 month after seed implantation. For MRI-based dosimetry, T2-weighted images were fused with the CE-T1WI; the prostate was delineated on the T2-weighted images, and the seed detection was performed manually on the CE-T1WI. In CT-based dosimetry, the seed detection was essentially performed automatically. The dosimetric results obtained by MRI-based and CT-based dosimetry were compared.ResultsThe mean prostate D₉₀ (the minimum dose received by 90% of the prostate volume) estimated by MRI-based and CT-based dosimetry were 113% and 115%, respectively, with no significant difference. The mean prostate V₁₀₀ (the percent volume of the postimplant prostate receiving 100% of the prescribed dose) estimated by MRI-based and CT-based dosimetry were 95.2% and 95.8%, respectively, again with no significant difference. The mean prostate V₁₅₀ (the percent volume of the postimplant prostate receiving 150% of the prescribed dose) estimated by MRI-based and CT-based dosimetry were 52.8% and 57.0%, respectively (p < 0.01). In all of the 35 patients (14%) in whom the MRI-based V₁₅₀ were at least 10% lower than the CT-based results, the seed detection by CT-based dosimetry was overestimated in highly seed-clustered areas or in the areas close to calcifications because of reconstruction artifacts in CT images.ConclusionsMRI-based dosimetry using CE-T1WI appears to be acceptable. Our results suggest that MRI-based dosimetry is a practical method for estimation of the higher dose distribution, especially if seeds are clustered together or when they are close to calcifications.     

Concurrent chemoradiation for cervical cancer: Comparison of LDR and HDR brachytherapy

PurposeTo compare clinical outcomes between low-dose-rate (LDR) brachytherapy and high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy for cervical cancer patients.Methods and MaterialsAll consecutive newly diagnosed cervical cancer patients undergoing pretreatment 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography imaging and treated with curative-intent definitive chemoradiation from 1997 to 2016 at a U.S. academic center were included. Brachytherapy boost was LDR or HDR 2D treatment planning from 1997 to 2005 and HDR with MR-based 3D planning from 2005 to 2016. Local control (LC), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and late bowel/bladder complications were evaluated.ResultsTumor stages were International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics IB1-IIB (n = 457; 75%) and III-IVA (n = 152; 25%). Brachytherapy was LDR for 104 patients and HDR for 505 patients. Concurrent weekly cisplatin was administered to 536 patients (88%). With median followup of 9.4 years, there was no difference in LC (p = 0.24) or CSS (p = 0.50) between LDR and HDR brachytherapy. Cox multivariable regression showed that only International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage III-IVA (HR=2.4, p = 0.004) was associated with worse LC. A propensity-matched cohort (90 LDR vs. 90 HDR) was created, and the 5-year LC rates were 88% LDR and 82% HDR, p = 0.26; 5-year CSS rates were 66% LDR and 58% HDR, p = 0.19; 5-year grade ≥3 bowel/bladder toxicities were 23% LDR and 16% HDR, p = 0.44. For all patients, the 5-year late toxicity in stage III-IVA patients was higher with LDR 47% vs. HDR 15%, p = 0.03, with no difference in LC, 86% and 75%, respectively (p = 0.09).ConclusionsThere was no difference in LC with either LDR or HDR brachytherapy. The late complication rate was reduced with HDR and 3D-planned brachytherapy compared to LDR and 2D-planned brachytherapy.     

Single-fraction brachytherapy as monotherapy for early-stage prostate cancer: The UCSF experience

PurposeHigh-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy as monotherapy is an effective treatment option for localized prostate cancer, but experience with single-fraction brachytherapy is limited by studies with small sample size. We report a large single-institution experience with single-fraction HDR brachytherapy as monotherapy for early-stage prostate cancer.Methods and MaterialsRetrospective chart review was performed for men treated with HDR brachytherapy as monotherapy for low- to intermediate-risk prostate cancer. Competing risk analyses were performed to estimate subdistribution hazard ratio and cumulative incidence of biochemical recurrence (BCR) and prostate cancer–specific mortality.ResultsWe identified 124 men with a median followup of 2.2 years (interquartile range 25th to 75th percentile: 1.8–3). Overall, 21.0% of patients (n = 26) were low risk, 44.4% (n = 55) were favorable intermediate risk, and 34.7% (n = 43) were unfavorable intermediate risk. At 2 years, the cumulative incidence of BCR was 3.5%: 0% for low risk, 4.0% for favorable intermediate risk patients, and 4.5% for unfavorable intermediate risk patients. In total, 12 BCRs were observed (9.7%) and approximately half occurred after median followup of 2.2 years. Compared with low-risk and favorable intermediate-risk disease, unfavorable intermediate-risk disease was significantly associated with BCR (subdistribution hazard ratio: 3.6, 95% CI: 1.1 to 11.1, p = 0.03). Prostate cancer–specific mortality was 0%. No patient experienced Grade 3 or higher acute or late genitourinary toxicity.ConclusionsSingle-fraction brachytherapy for early-stage prostate cancer was safe with promising short-term disease control rates, especially for low-risk patients. Longer term followup is needed as we observed an overall BCR rate of 9.7%.     

High-dose-rate vs. low-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy boost for anal canal cancers

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to analyze and compare clinical outcomes of low-dose-rate (LDR) and high-dose-rate (HDR) interstitial brachytherapy boost (ISBT) after EBRT or radio chemotherapy for the treatment of anal canal cancers.Methods and MaterialsOne hundred patients with anal canal cancers were treated at our institution by ISBT [LDR (n = 50); HDR (n = 50)]. Chronic toxicity rates, local control, disease-free survival, overall survival, and colostomy-free survival of the two different dose-rate brachytherapy modalities were analyzed and compared.ResultsWith a median followup of 42.2 months (95% CI, [34.5–48.8]), 9 (9% [4.8–16.2%]) local recurrences were observed, 4 (8% [3.2–18.8%]) in LDR vs. 5 (10% [4.4–21.4%]) in HDR group (odds ratio [OR] = 1.28 [0.32–5.07], p = 0.73). The 5-year rate of local control for the entire population was 90% [81–95%], 93% [79–98%] vs. 86% [69–94%] for LDR and HDR, respectively (p = 0.38). The 5-year disease-free survival rate for all patients was 82% [71–90%], 88% [73–95%] vs. 72% [44–88%] for LDR and HDR, respectively (p = 0.21). The 5-year overall survival rate for global population was 94% [84–98%], with no significant differences between LDR (97% [79–100%]) and HDR (93% [80–98%]) (p = 0.27). The 5-year colostomy-free survival rate was 92% [83–96%], respectively, 95% [83–99%] vs. 86% [69–94%] for LDR and HDR (p = 0.21). Significant differences were found in terms of chronic toxicity rates, with 28 (56% [42.3–68.8%]) patients concerned in low-dose-rate brachytherapy vs. 17 (34% [22.4–47.9%]) in high-dose-rate brachytherapy (OR = 0.40 [0.18–0.91], p = 0.03).ConclusionsLocal recurrence rates were comparable between both groups; HDR brachytherapy seem to have a better toxicity profile. Our data confirmed the finding that HDR can be used to safely administer ISBT without increasing chronic toxicity.     

Equivalent uniform dose, D(90), and V(100) correlation with biochemical control after low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy for clinically low-risk prostate cancer

PURPOSE: To assess the correlation of postimplant dosimetric quantifiers with biochemical control of prostate cancer after low-dose-rate brachytherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Generalized equivalent uniform dose (EUD), dose in Gy to 90% of the prostate gland (D(90)), and percentage of the prostate receiving 100% of the prescribed dose (V(100)) were calculated from the postimplant dose-volume histogram (DVH) for 140 patients undergoing low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy (LDRPB) monotherapy from 1997 to 2003 at Duke University and the Durham VA Medical Center. Biochemical recurrence was defined according to the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology consensus definition. RESULTS: Median followup after LDRPB was 50 months. There was a 7% biochemical recurrence rate (10/140) at last clinical followup. The median EUD was 167 Gy (range, 41-245). The median D(90) was 139 Gy (range, 45-203). The median V(100) was 88% (range, 44-100). The overall 5-year biochemical recurrence-free survival (bRFS) was 94.2%. The 5-year bRFS was 100% for EUD> or =167 Gy and 89.4% for EUD <167 Gy (p=0.008); 100% for D(90) > or =140 Gy and 90.4% for D(90) <140 Gy (p=0.020); 100% for V(100) > or =88%; and 90.3% for V(100) <88% (p=0.017). There was no statistically significant correlation between any of these factors and overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: In our series of 140 patients with low-risk prostate cancer treated with LDRPB alone, we observed a statistically significant correlation between EUD, D(90), and V(100) and bRFS. The generalized EUD, a calculated value that incorporates the entire prostate DVH, appears to be at least as well correlated with bRFS as D(90) or V(100), and may more completely represent the totality of the dose distribution.     

Feasibility of an MRI-only workflow for postimplant dosimetry of low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy: Transition from phantoms to patients

PurposeThe lack of positive contrast from brachytherapy seeds in conventional MR images remains a major challenge toward an MRI-only workflow for postimplant dosimetry of low-dose-rate brachytherapy. In this work, the feasibility of our recently proposed MRI-only workflow in clinically relevant scenarios is investigated and the necessary modifications in image acquisition and processing pipeline are proposed for transition to the clinic.Methods and MaterialsFour prostate phantoms with a total of 321 I-125 implanted dummy seeds and three patients with a total of 168 implanted seeds were scanned using a gradient echo sequence on 1.5 T and 3T MR scanners. Quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) was performed for seed visualization. Before QSM, the seed-induced distortion correction was performed followed by edge enhancement. Seed localization was performed using spatial clustering algorithms and was compared with CT. In addition, feasibility of the proposed method on detection of prostatic calcifications was studied.ResultsThe proposed susceptibility-based algorithm generated consistent positive contrast for the seeds in phantoms and patients. All the 321 seeds in the four phantoms were correctly identified; the MR-derived seeds centroids agreed well with CT-derived positions (average error = 0.5 ± 0.3 mm). The proposed algorithm for seed visualization was found to be orientation invariant. In patient cases, all seeds were visualized and correctly localized (average error = 1.2 ± 0.9 mm); no significant differences between dose volume histogram parameters were found. Prostatic calcifications were depicted with negative contrast on QSM and spatially agreed with CT.ConclusionsThe proposed MRI-based approach has great potential to replace the current CT-based practices. Additional patient studies are necessary to further optimize and validate the workflow.     

Dose to the dominant intraprostatic lesion using HDR vs. LDR monotherapy: A Phase II randomized trial

PurposeTo present the dosimetric results of a Phase II randomized trial comparing dose escalation to the MRI-defined dominant intraprostatic lesion (DIL) using either low-dose-rate (LDR) or high-dose-rate (HDR) prostate brachytherapy.Material and MethodsPatients receiving prostate brachytherapy as monotherapy were randomized to LDR or HDR brachytherapy. Prostate and DILs were contoured on preoperative multiparametric MRI. These images were registered with transrectal ultrasound for treatment planning. LDR brachytherapy was preplanned using I-125 seeds. HDR brachytherapy used intraoperative transrectal ultrasound–based planning to deliver 27 Gy/2 fractions in separate implants. DIL location was classified as peripheral, central, or anterior. A student t-test compared DIL D₉₀ between modalities and DIL locations.ResultsOf 60 patients, 31 underwent LDR and 29 HDR brachytherapy. Up to three DILs were identified per patient (100 total) with 74 peripheral, six central, and 20 anterior DILs. Mean DIL volume was 1.9 cc (SD: 1.7 cc) for LDR and 1.6 cc (SD 1.3 cc) for HDR (p = 0.279). Mean DIL D₉₀ was 151% (SD 30%) for LDR and 132% (SD 13%) for HDR. For LDR, mean peripheral DIL D₉₀ was 159% (SD 27%) and central or anterior 127% (SD 13%). HDR peripheral DILs received 137% (SD 12%) and central or anterior 119% (SD 7%). DIL D₉₀ for peripheral lesions was higher than anterior and central (p < 0.001).ConclusionsDIL location affects dose escalation, particularly because of urethral proximity, such as for anterior and central DILs. HDR brachytherapy may dose escalate better when target DIL is close to critical organs.     

Detection of air gaps around the cylinder by postinsertion computed tomography in vaginal cuff brachytherapy: A prospective series,systematic review,and meta-analysis

PurposePostinsertion computed tomography (CT) can identify air gaps (AGs) around the cylinder in vaginal cuff brachytherapy (VCB). This study investigates the incidence and location of AGs.Methods and MaterialsPlanning CTs of 22 prospectively recruited patients (NCT02091050) treated with 2.6 cm (n = 8) and 3.0 cm (n = 14) cylinders were evaluated. In addition, a systematic literature review and meta-analysis was performed (PubMed and EMBASE). The pooled incidence of AGs was calculated by using the random-effects model weighted by inverse variance.ResultsIn 18 cases (82%), a total of 45 AGs were found: 26 within the 2 cm cranial length and 19 between 2 and 4 cm of the cylinder. The mean AG diameter was 3.7 mm (range: 1.3–11.8). Cylinder diameter, primary tumor site, and use of external beam radiotherapy were not associated with AG incidence. Systematic literature review revealed nine additional relevant studies, totaling 657 patients. The pooled incidence of patients with ≥1 AG was 67% (95% confidence interval: 50–83). AGs were located at the apex in 43.4%–94.4% of cases. In patients with ≥1 AG (n = 244), the pooled mean number of AGs was 2.18 per patient. The mean dose reduction varied from 9.6% to 29.3%.ConclusionMore than two-thirds of VCB cases present with AGs, which are most commonly at the apex and can potentially reduce mucosal dose. By identifying AGs, postinsertion CT can facilitate selection of optimal cylinder size in VCB.     

Long-term efficacy and urological toxicity of low-dose-rate brachytherapy (LDR-BT) as monotherapy in localized prostate cancer

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence of late severe (≥Grade 3) urinary toxicity and the long-term efficacy after low-dose-rate brachytherapy (LDR-BT) in patients with localized prostate cancer (PCa).Methods and MaterialsDuring the years 1999–2008, 241 patients with PCa who underwent LDR-BT with I¹²⁵ and were followed up in Kuopio University Hospital were included to this analysis. The incidence of late severe (Grade 3) urinary toxicity and the long-term efficacy results were analyzed.ResultsAll D'Amico risk groups were represented, as 58.9%, 35.3%, and 5.8% of the patients were classified as low-, intermediate-, and high-risk patients, respectively. With a median followup of 11.4 years after implantation, the incidence of severe urinary toxicity increased throughout the followup period. The risk of Grade 3 urinary toxicity was highest among patients with higher Gleason scores (p = 0.016) and higher initial urine residual volumes (p = 0.017) and the cumulative incidence of severe urinary toxicity was 10.0%. The crude rate for transurethral prostatic resection was 5.8%. The relapse-free survival, the cause-specific survival, and the overall survival were 79.3%, 95.0%, and 66.4%, respectively.ConclusionsThe treatment was well tolerated as 90% of patients avoided any Grade 3 urinary toxicity. LDR-BT for localized PCa achieved high and durable efficacy. These results support the role of LDR-BT monotherapy as one of the valid primary treatment options for low-risk and favorable intermediate-risk patients.     

Relationship between Day 0 dosimetric parameters and biochemical relapse-free survival in patients treated with transperineal permanent prostate interstitial brachytherapy with 125I seeds

ObjectivesTo determine the relationship between dosimetric parameters obtained on postimplantation Day 0 and biochemical relapse-free survival (bRFS) in patients treated with ¹²⁵I transperineal interstitial permanent prostate brachytherapy (TIPPB).MethodsTwo-hundred twenty men with low-risk (n = 155, 70.4%), low-volume intermediate-risk (n = 63, 28.7%), or high-risk (n = 2, 0.9%) prostate cancer were treated with TIPPB between December 2000 and June 2006. Seventy-four (33.6%) patients received short-term (3–6 months) androgen suppression therapy before TIPPB. The median followup for patients free of biochemical failure was of 37.9 months (range, 24.0–84.5 months).ResultsThe receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis established a best-fit cutoff value for the quantifiers D₉₀ and V₁₀₀ of 147 Gy and 92%, respectively. The Kaplan–Meier analysis of bRFS at the cutoff value of D₉₀ = 147 Gy using the ASTRO, nadir + 2, and combined (ASTRO and nadir + 2) definitions showed a trend toward statistical significance for the ASTRO (p = 0.076) and nadir + 2 (p = 0.064) definitions and a statistically significant correlation for the combined definition (p = 0.033). The corresponding 7-year bRFS for the D₉₀ >147 Gy and D₉₀ ≤147 Gy subsets using the ASTRO, nadir + 2, and combined definitions were 96.5% vs. 89.7% (ASTRO, p = 0.076); 93.7% vs. 70.5% (nadir + 2, p = 0.064); and 94.4 vs. 75.5% (combined, p = 0.033). The V₁₀₀ (%) cutoff value of 92% predicted by the ROC analysis was not significant. Among other cutoff values, only D₉₀ = 140 Gy (p = 0.050) and D₉₀ = 160 Gy (p = 0.098) showed a trend toward statistical significance when the nadir + 2 and the ASTRO definitions were used. The rest of dosimetric, tumor, and patient parameters did not show statistical correlation with bRFS in the Kaplan–Meier analysis.ConclusionsThe cutoff value of D₉₀ = 147 Gy obtained on postimplantation Day 0 showed a trend toward significant correlation with bRFS when the standard ASTRO and nadir + 2 definitions were used and a weak but statistically significant correlation with bRFS as per the nonstandard combined definition in a series of patients with predominantly low-risk disease (70.4%) treated at high radiation doses (median D₉₀ = 152.9 Gy, median V₁₀₀ = 92.5%).     

Comparison of intraoperative ultrasound with postimplant computed tomography--dosimetric values at Day 1 and Day 30 after prostate brachytherapy

PurposeTo compare the results of intraoperative dosimetry with those of postimplant computed tomography (CT)-based dosimetry after ¹²⁵I prostate brachytherapy.Methods and materialsWe treated 412 prostate cancer patients with ¹²⁵I prostate brachytherapy, with or without external beam radiotherapy at our institution. Neoadjuvant hormone therapy was administered to 331 patients (80.3%). Implantation was performed using an intraoperative interactive technique. Postimplant dosimetry was performed on Day 1 and Day 30 using CT imaging. The dosimetric results for the prostate, urethra, and rectum were compared among intraoperative ultrasound, and CT scans of Day 1 and Day 30.ResultsThe mean intraoperative minimal dose received by 90% of the prostate volume (D₉₀) was 118.8% of the prescribed dose vs. 106.4% for Day 1 (p < 0.01) and 119.2% for Day 30 (p = 0.25). There were no significant correlations between the intraoperative D₉₀ and the postimplant D₉₀ values (intraclass correlation coefficients = 0.42 and 0.33 for Day 1 and Day 30, respectively). Prostatic edema at Day 1 had the largest effect on the Day 1 D₉₀ (p < 0.01). The factor significantly affecting the Day 30 D₉₀ was neoadjuvant hormone therapy (p < 0.01). The mean Day 30 D₉₀ for the hormone-treated patients was 117.9%, compared with 124.6% for those who remained hormone naïve. The intraoperative and postimplant dosimetric values differed significantly for the urethra and rectum.ConclusionsOur results demonstrate that there are no significant differences between the D₉₀ assessments obtained intraoperatively and at Day 30 postoperatively. Furthermore, there are no definite correlations between intra- and postimplantation dosimetric values. Other D₉₀ values differed significantly between the intraoperative and postimplant dosimetry. This study suggests that dosimetry has negligible clinical utility for informing patients, at discharge, of whether or not their implants are adequate.     

Moving incision for covert breast-conserving surgery may prevent early wound complications in brachytherapy-based partial-breast irradiation

PurposeBrachytherapy-based partial-breast irradiation (PBI) is a treatment option for breast-conserving therapy. Although intraoperative catheter implantation has been introduced, early wound complications are a concern. Covert operations with a moving incision are widely performed to hide surgical scars and may reduce the incision-site radiation dose. This study aimed to compare complication rates for moving incision and conventional incision in covert breast-conserving surgery.Methods and MaterialsBetween October 2008 and December 2018, the medical records of all patients who underwent PBI using multicatheter interstitial brachytherapy after breast-conserving surgery were examined. Since July 2016, to hide the scar, we have performed a moving incision from above the tumor to an invisible site at our institution. The planning target volume included 1.0–1.5 cm of tissue surrounding the surgical cavity. High-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy with a dose of 32 Gy in eight fractions was performed. The cumulative incidences of surgical site infections and symptomatic seromas ≤90 days were analyzed.Results: The study included 516 consecutive patients with 526 lesions. Overall, 40 (7.6%) early wound complications were observed, in which 4 (2.6%) involved 152 moving incisions and 36 (9.6%) involved 374 conventional incisions (p = 0.01). On univariate analysis, age, tumor diameter, re-excision, planning target volume, numbers of catheters and planes, and incision type were risk factors for complications. On multivariate analysis, only incision type was a risk factor. Moving incision reduced the early complication rate by 75% (p = 0.01).ConclusionMoving incision in covert breast-conserving surgery reduced the risk of early wound complications.