Circulating Inflammation Proteins Associated With Lung Cancer in African Americans

IntroductionLung cancer incidence is higher among African Americans (AAs) compared with European Americans (EAs) in the United States. We and others have previously shown a relationship between immune and inflammation proteins with lung cancer in EAs. Our aim was to investigate the etiologic relationship between inflammation and lung cancer in AAs.MethodsWe adopted a two-stage, independent study design (discovery cases, n = 316; control cases, n = 509) (validation cases, n = 399; control cases, n = 400 controls) and measured 30 inflammation proteins in blood using Meso Scale Discovery V- PLEX multiplex assays.ResultsWe identified and validated 10 proteins associated with lung cancer in AAS, some that were common between EAs and AAs (C-reactive proteins [OR: 2.90; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.99–4.22], interferon γ [OR: 1.55; 95% CI: 1.10–2.19], interleukin 6 [OR: 6.28; 95% CI: 4.10–9.63], interleukin 8 [OR: 2.76; 95% CI: 1.92–3.98]) and some that are only observed among AAs (interleukin 10 [OR: 1.69; 95% CI: 1.20–2.38], interleukin 15 [OR: 2.83; 95% CI: 1.96–4.07], interferon gamma-induced protein 10 [OR: 1.54; 95% CI: 1.09–2.18], monocyte chemotactic protein-4 [OR: 0.54; 95% CI: 0.38–0.76], macrophage inflammatory protein-1 alpha [OR: 1.57; 95% CI: 1.12–2.21], and tumor necrosis factor β [OR: 0.52; 95% CI: 0.37–0.74]). We did not find evidence that either menthol cigarette smoking or global genetic ancestry drove these population differences.ConclusionsOur results highlight a distinct inflammation profile associated with lung cancer in AAs compared with EAs. These data provide new insight into the etiology of lung cancer in AAs. Further work is needed to understand what drives this relationship with lung cancer and whether these proteins have utility in the setting of early diagnosis.     

Impact of Adherence to Multidisciplinary Recommendations for Adjuvant Treatment in Radical Prostatectomy Patients With High Risk of Recurrence

IntroductionThe purpose of this study was to investigate adherence to recommended adjuvant radiotherapy (aRT) in radical prostatectomy (RP) patients with adverse pathologic features and to analyse the outcome of patients who followed or denied this recommendation.Patients and MethodsWe included 1140 consecutive RP patients (2006-2015) with non-organ confined (pT3) prostate cancer and either positive surgical margins (R1) and/or lymph node involvement (pN1) and non-detectable postoperative prostate-specific antigen who received multidisciplinary aRT recommendations. Patients were stratified into adherence versus non-adherence to recommendations. Additionally, subgroups within pathologic criteria (pT3R1N0, pT3R0N1, pT3R1N1) were analyzed. Kaplan-Meier, as well as multivariable Cox regression analyses were used to assess biochemical recurrence (BCR)-free survival, metastasis-free survival, cancer-specific survival, and overall survival.ResultsOverall, 508 (44.6%) patients were non-adherent. Of those, 273 (53.6%) did not receive any RT, and 235 (46.4%) received salvage RT. At 8 years, BCR-free survival was 57.7 versus 20.1%, metastasis-free survival was 76.5 versus 75.4%, cancer-specific survival was 91.7 versus 87.4%, and overall survival was 80.4 versus 75.8% in adherent versus non-adherent patients, respectively (P < .001). In multivariable Cox regression predicting BCR, metastatic progression, cancer-specific mortality, and overall mortality, non-adherence to aRT recommendation represented an independent predictor (hazard ratio [HR], 3.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.1-4.5; HR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.2-2.2; HR, 2.8; 95% CI, 1.5-5.3; and HR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.2-2.8, respectively).ConclusionsOnly about 55% of patients followed our multidisciplinary recommendations. Adherent patients were significantly less likely to experience BCR, metastatic progression, cancer-specific mortality, and overall mortality. Thus, patients with high risk of recurrence may be advised about the possibility of improved oncologic outcomes in case of adherence to aRT recommendations.     

Increasing Rates of Perioperative Chemotherapy are Associated With Improved Survival in Men With Urothelial Bladder Cancer With Prostatic Stromal Invasion

BackgroundOur objective was to test whether the rates of perioperative chemotherapy (CHT) administration in patients with urothelial bladder cancer (UCUB) with prostatic stromal invasion (pT4a) changed over time. Moreover, we tested the effect of CHT on overall mortality (OM), as well as on cancer-specific mortality (CSM) in this patient population.Materials and MethodsWithin the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2004-2016), we identified 1513 men with non-metastatic UCUB with prostatic stromal invasion who underwent radical cystectomy with lymph node dissection, with or without CHT administration. Estimated annual percentage change analyses, inverse probability of treatment-weighting (IPTW), Kaplan-Meier plots, Cox regression models, and landmark analyses were performed.ResultsOverall, 732 (48.4%) patients with pT4a UCUB disease underwent radical cystectomy with perioperative CHT administration between 2004 and 2016. The CHT administration rate increased from 29.0% in 2004 to 64.8% in 2016 (P < .001). In IPTW-adjusted analyses, the 5-year overall survival was 47.7% versus 39.8%, and cancer-specific survival was 53.6 versus 50.1%, for with versus without CHT administration, respectively. After multivariable and IPTW-adjusted Cox regression models, administration of CHT independently predicted lower OM (hazard ratio [HR], 0.62; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.52-0.73), as well as lower CSM (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.55-0.80). even after 3-month landmark analyses (OM HR, 0.64; 95% CI 0.54-0.76; CSM HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.58-0.85).ConclusionsThe use of CHT in patients with pT4a UCUB increased from low to moderate in the most contemporary era. However, based on its impressive reduction in OM, as well as in CSM, further increases in CHT administration rates should be highly encouraged in this patient population.     

Patient,provider, and hospital factors associated with oral anti-neoplastic agent initiation and adherence in older patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma

IntroductionOral anti-neoplastic agents (OAAs) for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) are associated with increased cancer-specific survival. However, racial disparities in survival persist and older adults have the lowest rates of cancer-specific survival. Research from other cancers demonstrates specialty access is associated with high-quality cancer care, but older adults receive cancer treatment less often than younger adults. We therefore examined whether patient, provider, and hospital characteristics were associated with OAA initiation, adherence, and cancer-specific survival after initiation and whether race, ethnicity, and/or age was associated with an increased likelihood of seeing a medical oncologist for diagnosis of mRCC.Patients and MethodsWe used Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)Medicare data to identify patients ≥65 years of age who were diagnosed with mRCC from 2007 to 2015 and enrolled in Medicare Part D. Insurance claims were used to identify receipt of OAAs within twelve months of metastatic diagnosis, calculate proportion of days covered, and to identify the primary cancer provider and hospital. We examined provider and hospital characteristics associated with OAA initiation, adherence, and all-cause mortality after OAA initiation.ResultsWe identified 2792 patients who met inclusion criteria. Increased OAA initiation was associated with access to a medical oncologist. Patients were less likely to begin OAA treatment if their primary oncologic provider was a urologist (hazard ratio [HR] 0.62; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.49–0.77). Provider/hospital characteristics were not associated with differences in OAA adherence or mortality. Patients who started sorafenib (odds ratio [OR] 0.50; 95% CI 0.29–0.86), were older (aged >81 OR 0.56; 95% CI 0.34–0.92), and those living in high poverty ZIP codes (OR 0.48; 95% CI 0.29–0.80) were less likely to adhere to OAA treatment. Furthermore, provider characteristics did not account for differences in mortality once an OAA was initiated. Last, only age > 81 years was statistically and clinically associated with a decreased relative risk of seeing a medical oncologist (risk ratio [RR] 0.87; CI 0.82–0.92).ConclusionProvider/hospital factors, specifically, being seen by a medical oncologist for mRCC diagnosis, are associated with OAA initiation. Older patients were less likely to see a medical oncologist; however, race and/or ethnicity was not associated with differences in seeing a medical oncologist. Patient factors are more critical to OAA adherence and mortality after OAA initiation than provider/hospital factors.     

Effect of Breast Conservation Therapy vs Mastectomy on Overall Survival and Breast Cancer-Specific Survival Among Men With Stage I-II Breast Cancer: Analysis of SEER, 2000-2018

BackgroundMale breast cancer is a rare malignant tumor, and outcomes of breast conservation therapy (BCT) are currently lacking.MethodThe retrospective, population-based cohort study included 1369 stage I-II (T1–2 N0–1 M0) male breast cancer patients from the SEER database (2000-2018). The patients were grouped in two groups: BCT group and mastectomy group, according to surgical and radiation therapy. Kaplan-Meier method and univariable Cox proportional hazard analysis were used to compare overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) between two treatment groups. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to balance the confounding factors.ResultsOf the 1369 men, 97 (7%) patients received BCT, 1272 (93%) received mastectomy alone. The 5- and 10-year OS rates were 92.3% and 80.7% for BCT group compared with 80.4% and 61.4% for mastectomy group. The 5- and 10-year BCSS rates were 96.5% and 93.9% for patients undergoing BCT, as compared with 93.1% and 84.4% for patients undergoing mastectomy. Compared with mastectomy group, BCT group showed improved OS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.294; 95% CI 0.138-0.623, P = .002) and BCSS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.182; 95% CI 0.040-0.820, P = .027). Of the 791 patients with T1 stage, BCT showed insignificant association with OS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.555; 95% CI 0.207-1.488, P = .242) and BCSS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.217; 95% CI 0.171-8.675, P = .844).ConclusionThe results of this cohort study suggest that BCT is at least equivalent to mastectomy in male breast cancer patients. The underlying mechanism of this association needs further research.     

Determinants of Guideline-Based Treatment in Patients With cT1 Bladder Cancer

IntroductionClinical T1 (cT1) bladder cancer is associated with high rates of recurrence, upstaging, and progression. Guidelines recommend that these patients be treated with adjuvant intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guérin immunotherapy (BCG) or upfront radical cystectomy (RC). We analyzed the National Cancer Database (NCDB) to identify demographic and clinical determinants of guideline-based treatment (GBT) and RC.Patients and MethodsWe identified 47,694 patients in the NCDB with cT1 bladder cancer diagnosed in 2004-2013. Those who did not receive any treatment or underwent primary chemotherapy were excluded. Mixed effects logistic regression adjusted for facility-level variation was used to identify factors associated with receipt of GBT.ResultsThe median age of the cohort was 72 years (interquartile range, 63-79). Of the patients, 22.4% were female, 5.1% were African American, and 2.7% had variant histology. Nearly one-third of patients received GBT: 11,453 (24%) were initially treated with BCG and 3320 (7%) were initially treated with RC. Recent year of diagnosis (odds ratio [OR], 1.67; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.52-1.85; P < .001), treatment at an academic center (OR, 2.42; 95% CI, 2.27-2.59; P < .001), and private insurance status (OR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.19-1.66; P < .001) were associated with increased odds of GBT. Of patients who received GBT, variant histology (OR, 5.89; 95% CI, 4.65-7.47; P < .001), and recent year of diagnosis (OR, 1.89; 95% CI, 1.50-2.39; P < .001) were associated with greater odds of RC.ConclusionThere is low treatment-guideline compliance for patients with cT1 disease. However, there appears to be a temporal trend toward increased use of GBT. Efforts should be made to understand why many cT1 bladder cancer patients do not receive GBT.     

Use of Bevacizumab for Elderly Patients With Stage IV Colon Cancer: Analysis of SEER-Medicare Data

BackgroundBevacizumab is used for the treatment of metastatic colon cancer in conjunction with first-line chemotherapy. In this study, we examined receipt of first-line bevacizumab and predictors of its use among older patients with stage IV colon cancer.Materials and MethodsWe used data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare dataset to identify patients with stage IV colon cancer diagnosed from 2005 to 2013 who received FOLFOX (5-fluorouracil/leucovorin/oxaliplatin) or FOLFIRI (5-fluorouracil/leucovorin/irinotecan) as first-line therapy. We used multivariable regression analysis to determine demographic and clinical factors associated with use of concomitant bevacizumab.ResultsWe identified 3785 patients with stage IV colon cancer who met our eligibility criteria. Of these, 2352 (62.1%) received bevacizumab. Bevacizumab use has decreased over time from 68.2% in 2005 to 57.6% in 2013 (odds ratio [OR], 0.94; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.91-0.97). Patients were less likely to receive bevacizumab if they were older (compared with 65-69 years, ≥ 80 years: OR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.52-0.80), or had multiple comorbidities (compared with comorbidity score of 0, score of 1: OR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.60-0.89).ConclusionOver one-half of elderly patients received bevacizumab as part of their first-line therapy for stage IV colon cancer. Bevacizumab use has been slowly decreasing since 2005. Newer anti-epidermal growth factor receptor treatments have not been supplanting bevacizumab, as first-line biologic use in general has also decreased during this time period.     

Rise in Node-Positive Prostate Cancer Incidence in Context of Evolving Use and Extent of Pelvic Lymphadenectomy

BackgroundThe incidence of node-positive prostate cancer has risen and might be partially explained by evolving use of lymphadenectomy at a population level. We assessed trends of node-positive prostate cancer in context of extent of lymphadenectomy among men treated surgically for prostate cancer.Patients and MethodsThis was a retrospective study using data from a population-based cancer registry to identify men older than 50 years of age diagnosed with prostate cancer from 2010 to 2015 without distant metastases. We considered extent of node dissection as ordinal (1-4, 5-9, 10-14, 15-19, ≥20) and dichotomous (1-14, ≥15) variables. We fit multivariable models to assess trends in receipt of extended lymphadenectomy and then estimated odds of node-positive cancer on the basis of extent of lymphadenectomy.ResultsWe identified 280,156 men diagnosed from 2010 to 2015; 5355 men (1.9%) had positive lymph nodes. Incidence of positive nodes increased from 6.4 to 8.4 cases per 100,000 men from 2010 to 2015 (standardized rate ratio, 1.31; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.20-1.44). Compared with 2010, prostatectomy patients with high-risk (odds ratio [OR], 1.66; 95% CI, 1.42-1.95) and intermediate-risk tumors (OR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.47-1.88) were more likely to undergo extended lymphadenectomy in 2015. Among high-risk patients, men with ≥20 nodes removed were 7 times more likely to have positive nodes, versus <5 removed (6.1% for 1-4 vs. 32.4% for ≥20; OR, 7.32; 95% CI, 6.16-8.71). After adjusting for extent of dissection, odds of node-positive disease did not increase between 2010 and 2015 (OR, 1.17; 95% CI, 0.98-1.39) among high-risk patients.ConclusionIncreased incidence of node-positive prostate cancer in the United States is partially explained by more frequent use of extended lymphadenectomy.     

Risk Factors for Cancer-specific Mortality and Cardiovascular Mortality in Patients With Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma

BackgroundThe purpose of this study was to assess the risk factors for cancer-specific mortality and cardiovascular mortality in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).Patients and MethodsA retrospective cohort study involving patients with DLBCL who were registered in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database was performed. The risk factors for cancer-specific mortality and cardiovascular mortality were analyzed using the competing risk regression model.ResultsA total of 62,950 patients with DLBCL were enrolled, of which 23,302 (37.50%) died of cancer and 2940 (4.70%) died of cardiovascular disease. The competing risk multivariate analysis displayed that age at diagnosis (hazard ratio [HR], 1.033; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.032-1.034), marriedstatus (HR, 1.293; 95% CI, 1.241-1.347), black race (HR, 1.079; 95% CI, 1.021-1.139), and tumor stage (II: HR, 1.143; 95%CI, 1.095-1.192; III: HR, 1.459; 95% CI, 1.395-1.526; IV: HR, 1.961; 95% CI. 1.889-2.035) were the risk factors for cancer-specific mortality, but not female gender (HR, 0.938; 95% CI, 0.913,0.965) or treatment modalities (chemotherapy: HR, 0.522; 95% CI, 0.505-0.540; radiotherapy: HR, 0.782; 95% CI, 0.728-0.839; chemotherapy + radiotherapy: HR, 0.422; 95% CI, 0.403-0.441). Age at diagnosis (HR, 1.059; 95% CI, 1.055-1.062) and black race (HR, 1.246; 95% CI, 1.067-1.456) were the risk factors for cardiovascular mortality rather than female gender (HR, 0.803; 95% CI, 0.743-0.867) and married status (HR, 0.841; 95% CI, 0.745-0.950).ConclusionsAge at diagnosis, married status, black race, and higher tumor stage are associated with an increased risk of cancer-specific mortality in patients with DLBCL, whereas age at diagnosis and black race are associated with a higher risk of cardiovascular mortality.     

Personalized Decision Making in Early Stage Breast Cancer: Applying Clinical Prediction Models for Anthracycline Cardiotoxicity and Breast Cancer Mortality Demonstrates Substantial Heterogeneity of Benefit-Harm Trade-off

BackgroundAnthracycline agents can cause cardiotoxicity. We used multivariable risk prediction models to identify a subset of patients with breast cancer at high risk of cardiotoxicity, for whom the harms of anthracycline chemotherapy may balance or exceed the benefits.Patients and MethodsA clinical prediction model for anthracycline cardiotoxicity was created in 967 patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor-negative breast cancer treated with doxorubicin in the ECOG-ACRIN study E5103. Cardiotoxicity was defined as left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) decline of ≥ 10% to < 50% and/or a centrally adjudicated clinical heart failure diagnosis. Patient-specific incremental absolute benefit of anthracyclines (compared with non-anthracycline taxane chemotherapy) was estimated using the PREDICT model to assess breast cancer mortality risk.ResultsOf the 967 women who initiated therapy, 51 (5.3%) developed cardiotoxicity (12 with clinical heart failure). In a multivariate model, increasing age (odds ratio [OR], 1.04; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-1.08), higher body mass index (OR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.02-1.10), and lower baseline LVEF (OR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.89-0.98) at baseline were significantly associated with cardiotoxicity. The concordance statistic of the risk model was 0.70 (95% CI, 0.63-0.77). In patients with low anticipated treatment benefit (n = 176) from the addition of anthracycline (< 2% absolute risk difference of breast cancer mortality at 10 years), 16 (9%) of 176 had a > 10% risk of cardiotoxicity and 61 (35%) of 176 had a 5% to 10% risk of cardiotoxicity at 1 year.ConclusionOlder age, higher body mass index, and lower baseline LVEF were associated with increased risk of cardiotoxicity. We identified a subgroup with low predicted absolute benefit of anthracyclines but with high predicted risk of cardiotoxicity. Additional studies are needed incorporating long-term cardiac outcomes and cardiotoxicity model external validation prior to implementation in routine clinical practice.     

Effect of High-Versus Low-Frequency of Abdominopelvic Computed Tomography Follow-Up Testing on Overall Survival in Patients With Stage II Or III Colon Cancer

BackgroundIntensive surveillance of colon cancer by using the abdominopelvic computed tomography (AP-CT) is common in real world practice; however, it is still unclear whether high-frequency surveillance using AP-CT in patients with these risk factors is superior to that in the low-frequency surveillance.Patients and MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed 1803 patients with stage II-III colon cancer receiving curative surgery between January 1, 2005 to December 31, 2015. We evaluated the average scan-to-scan intervals of postoperative AP-CT testing and assigned patients with an interval of 5 to 8 and 9 to 13 months to the high-frequency (HF) and low-frequency (LF) groups, respectively. The cutoff value of preoperative and postoperative CEA levels was 5 ng/mL. We also applied propensity score matching (PSM) and inverse probability of treatment weighting to adjust clinicopathologic differences between the 2 groups.ResultsWe matched 1:1 for each surveillance group yielding a cohort of 776 matched patients. After PSM, Baseline demographics were overall well balanced between 2 groups. Stage III (OR, 2.00; 95% Confidence interval [CI], 1.21-3.30) and postoperative CEA elevation (OR, 2.30; 95% CI, 1.08-4.92) were independent risk factors of recurrence in multivariate analyses. Patient in the HF group had more surgery plus chemo- or radiotherapy as postrecurrence treatment than patient in the LF group (46.2% vs. 23.1%, P = .017). This trend was retained after PSM, although it is not significant (44.4% vs. 23.1%, P = .060). However, survival outcomes of high-frequency AP-CT surveillance were not superior to those of low-frequency surveillance in all subgroups, including stage III (HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.40-2.47) and postoperative CEA elevation (HR 1.36, 95% CI 0.45-4.11).ConclusionHigh-frequency AP-CT testing is associated with a higher proportion of surgery plus chemo- or radiotherapy as postrecurrence treatment, without improvement in 5-year overall survival.     

Predictors of undergoing multivisceral resection,margin status and survival in Dutch patients with locally advanced colorectal cancer

BackgroundThe aim of this nationwide observational study was to evaluate factors associated with multivisceral resection (MVR), margin status and overall survival in locally advanced colorectal cancer (CRC).Material and methodsPatients with (y)pT4, cM0 CRC between 2006 and 2017 were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Cox-proportional hazards modelling was used for survival analysis, stratified for T4a and T4b. Annual hospital volume cut-off was 75 for colon and 40 for rectal resections.ResultsA total of 11.930 patients were included and 2410 patients (20.2%) underwent MVR. Factors associated with MVR for colon and rectal cancer besides cT4 category were more recent diagnosis (OR 3.61, CI 95% 3.06–4.25 (colon) and OR 2.72, CI 95% 1.82–4.08 (rectum)) and high hospital volume (OR 1.20, CI 95% 1.05–1.38 (colon) and OR 2.17, CI 95% 1.55–3.04 (rectum)). Patients ≥70 year were less likely to undergo MVR for colon cancer (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.70–0.90). Risk factors for incomplete resection were cT4 (OR 3.08, CI 95% 2.35–4.04 (colon) and OR 1.82, CI 95% 1.13–2.94 (rectum)) and poor/undifferentiated tumors (OR 1.41, CI 95% 1.14–1.72 (colon) and OR 1.69, CI 95% 1.05–2.74 (rectum)). More recent diagnosis was independently associated with less incomplete resections in colon cancer (OR 0.58, CI 95% 0.40–0.76). Independent predictors of survival were age, resection margin, nodal status and adjuvant chemotherapy, but not MVR.ConclusionTreatment of locally advanced CRC with MVR at population level was influenced by year of diagnosis and hospital volume. Margin status in colon cancer improved substantially over time.     

En Bloc Excision of Phyllodes Tumor of the Breast: Radical Approach Heralds Better Outcome

IntroductionSurgery is the primary treatment of phyllodes tumor of the breast, and margins are the most important risk factor associated with local recurrence. We conducted a retrospective audit of 433 patients treated at our center.Patients and MethodsWomen who presented with phyllodes tumors between 1999 and 2017 were included in the analysis. Data was collected from the hospital medical records, telephonic interviews, and electronic mail.ResultsOf the 433 women included in this study, 177 (40.9%) had benign phyllodes tumors, 84 (19.4%) were borderline, 131 (30.3%) were malignant, and 41 (9.5%) had sarcoma. A history of previous excision was noted in 154 (35.6%) patients, of which 104 presented with local recurrence. Of the total patients, 209 (48.3%) underwent breast conservation surgery; the median pT was 6 cm. At a median follow-up of 37.9 months, the 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) was 82.9%. On multivariate analysis, the factors that impacted DFS were histology (hazard ratio, 4.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.5-10.9; P = .005) and history of previous excision biopsy (hazard ratio, 3.39; 95% CI, 1.76-6.52; P < .001). We analyzed 231 women who presented without any prior excision separately, wherein at a median follow-up of 44.1 months, the DFS was 92.1% (95% CI, 92.05%-92.15%). In addition, less recurrences were noted in this cohort (5.6% [13/231] in no-excision biopsy vs. 12.5% with surgery done prior to presentation to our institute).ConclusionA previous history of excision and the histologic subtype of phyllodes tumor are factors that have an impact on DFS, thus emphasizing the need for appropriate surgical planning and en bloc excision of the phyllodes at presentation.     

Cardiovascular and Metabolic Toxicity of Abiraterone in Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer: Post-marketing Experience

IntroductionAbiraterone improves survival in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) but may result in the development or worsening of comorbid conditions. We assessed the course of these conditions in patients receiving abiraterone in clinical practice and compared outcomes with those in clinical trials.Materials and MethodsMedical records of patients with mCRPC who started abiraterone at an academic institution between 2012 and 2015 were reviewed for emergency department (ED) visits, hospitalizations, and the development and/or worsening of key comorbid conditions while on abiraterone. Patient characteristics and adverse events were compared with those from clinical trials.ResultsIn a cohort of 174 patients, 28% experienced either the development or worsening of a comorbid disease; 8% required an ED visit or hospitalization owing to known adverse effects of abiraterone. Increasing age (odds ratio [OR], 1.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-1.17), higher prostate-specific antigen at initiation of treatment (OR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.18-2.47), preexisting uncontrolled hypertension (OR, 7.61; 95% CI, 1.22-38.70), congestive heart failure (OR, 7.61; 95% CI, 1.22-38.70), and cardiac arrhythmias (OR, 4.73; 95% CI, 1.39-15.12) were associated with increased odds of an ED visit or hospitalization owing to known adverse effects of abiraterone. The rate of discontinuation (6%) was similar to 1 phase III trial that demonstrated the drug’s efficacy in chemotherapy-naive patients.ConclusionFew patients discontinued abiraterone owing to toxicity; however, the fact that over one-quarter of patients experienced the development or worsening of cardiovascular and metabolic diseases warrants development of team-based approaches to the management of these comorbid conditions.     

Active Surveillance for Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Current Protocols and Outcomes

IntroductionCurrent guidelines allow active surveillance for intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients but do not provide comprehensive recommendations for selection. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes for active surveillance in intermediate- and low-risk groups.MethodsWe performed a systematic literature search of intermediate-risk localized prostate cancer patients undergoing active surveillance using 3 literature search engines (Medline, Web of Science, and Scopus) over the past 10 years. The primary outcome was the percentage of patients who remain under surveillance. Secondary outcomes included cancer-specific survival, overall survival, and metastasis-free survival. For articles including both low- and intermediate-risk patients undergoing active surveillance, comparisons between the two groups were made.ResultsThe proportion of patients who remained on active surveillance was comparable between the low- and intermediate-risk groups after 10 and 15 years’ follow-up (odds ratio [OR], 0.97; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.83–1.14; and OR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.65–1.13). Cancer-specific survival was worse in the intermediate-risk group after 10 years (OR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.31–0.69) and 15 years (OR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.2–0.58). The overall survival rate showed no statistical difference at 5 years’ follow-up (OR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.45–1.57) but was worse in the intermediate-risk group after 10 years (OR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.35–0.53). Metastases-free survival did not significantly differ after 5 years (OR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.2–1.53) and was worse in the intermediate-risk group after 10 years (OR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.28–0.77).ConclusionActive surveillance could be offered to patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer. However, they should be informed of the need for regular monitoring and the possibility of discontinuation as a result of a higher rate of progression. Available data indicate that 5-year survival rates between intermediate- and low-risk patients do not differ; 10-year survival rates are worse. To assess the long-term effectiveness and safety of active surveillance, it is necessary to develop unified algorithms for patient selection and management, and to prospectively conduct studies with long-term surveillance.     

Prevalence and predictors of interval colorectal cancers in medicare beneficiaries

BACKGROUND:

After a colonoscopy that is negative for cancer, a subset of patients may be diagnosed with colorectal cancer, also termed interval cancer. The frequency and predictors have not been well studied in a population‐based US cohort.

METHODS:

The authors used the linked Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)‐Medicare database to identify 57,839 patients aged ≥69 years who were diagnosed with colorectal cancer between 1994 and 2005 and who underwent colonoscopy within 6 months of cancer diagnosis. Colonoscopy performed between 6 and 36 months before cancer diagnosis was a proxy for interval cancer.

RESULTS:

By using the case definition, 7.2% of patients developed interval cancers. Factors that were associated with interval cancers included proximal tumor location (distal colon: multivariable odds ratio [OR], 0.42; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.390‐0.46; rectum: OR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.42‐0.53), increased comorbidity (OR, 1.89; 95% CI, 1.68 2.14 for ≥3 comorbidities), a previous diagnosis of diverticulosis (OR, 6.00; 95% CI, 5.57‐6.46), and prior polypectomy (OR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.62‐1.87). Risk factors at the endoscopist level included a lower polypectomy rate (OR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.63‐0.78 for the highest quartile), higher colonoscopy volume (OR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.13‐1.43), and specialty other than gastroenterology (colorectal surgery: OR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.16‐1.83; general surgery: OR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.24‐1.62; internal medicine: OR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.17‐1.63; family practice: OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.00‐1.35).

CONCLUSIONS:

A significant proportion of patients developed interval colorectal cancer, particularly in the proximal colon. Contributing factors likely included both procedural and biologic factors, emphasizing the importance of meticulous examination of the mucosa. Cancer 2012;118: 3044–52. © 2011 American Cancer Society.     

Association of Surgical Approach With Treatment Burden,Oncological Effectiveness,and Perioperative Morbidity in Adrenocortical Carcinoma

MicroabstractIn the National Cancer Database (NCDB), patients treated with minimally invasive adrenalectomy (MIA) for adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) had similar oncological outcomes and cumulative treatment burden with less morbidity compared with open adrenalectomy (OA). Although OA remains the standard of care for adrenal lesions concerninge for malignancy, MIA in appropriately selected patients may offer equivalent oncological outcomes.Introduction/BackgroundWe investigated the cumulative treatment burden, oncological effectiveness, and perioperative morbidity in patients undergoing MIA compared with (OA) for patients with ACC.Patients and MethodsWe reviewed the NCDB for patients undergoing surgical resection (MIA vs. OA) for ACC from 2010 to 2017. Inverse probability of treatment weighted logistic regression, negative binomial, and Cox proportional hazards models were fit to assess for an association of surgical approach with cumulative treatment burden (any adjuvant therapy, radiation therapy [RT], and systemic therapy), oncological effectiveness (positive surgical margins [PSM], lymph node yield [LNY], and overall survival [OS]), and perioperative morbidity (length of stay [LOS] and readmission) as appropriate.ResultsWe identified 776 patients that underwent adrenalectomy for ACC, of which 307 underwent MIA. We noted patients with larger tumors (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.78-0.86, P < .001) were less likely to have MIA prior to IPTW. We did not appreciate a significant association of MIA with cumulative treatment burden or the use of any adjuvant therapy (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.60-1.21, P = .375), adjuvant RT (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.59-1.50, P = .801), or adjuvant systemic therapy (OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.58-1.21, P = .352). Patients undergoing MIA had similar oncological effectiveness of surgery and OS when compared with patients which underwent OA. Patients that underwent MIA had a significantly shorter LOS (IRR: 0.74, 95% CI 0.62-0.88, P = .001) and lower odds of readmission (OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.23-0.91, P = .026).ConclusionsAlthough the standard of care for adrenal lesions suspicious for ACC remains OA, in appropriately selected patients, MIA may offer similar oncological effectiveness and cumulative treatment burden, with less morbidity, than OA.     

Disparities in Risk Reduction Therapy Recommendations for Young Women With Lobular Carcinoma In-Situ

BackgroundEndocrine therapy (ET) significantly reduces the risk of breast cancer development in high-risk patients diagnosed with lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS). However, the variables impacting recommendation and use of ET in young adults (YAs) is not well-studied. We examined the role of provider recommendation and patient acceptance for ET for YAs with LCIS.Materials and MethodsThe National Cancer Database was queried for women aged < 40 years with primary LCIS between 2000 and 2012. Socioeconomic, demographic, and treatment variables were examined to determine their impact on ET provider recommendation and initial patient acceptance of risk-reducing therapy.ResultsAmong 1650 YA patients with LCIS, only 749 (45.4%) were recommended ET. On multivariable analysis, women > 30 years of age were more likely recommended ET than women < 30 years (odds ratio [OR], 1.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.10-2.47), African Americans more than other ethnicities (OR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.1-2.0), and YAs treated in New England were more likely than those in the rest of the country (OR, 3.26; 95% CI, 2.0-5.2). Among YA women recommended ET, only 20.2% had a documented refusal. Only geography appeared to independently impact the likelihood of refusal, with YAs in the Southeastern-Central United States being most likely to refuse ET (OR, 5.4; 95% CI, 1.2-24.0).ConclusionET is underutilized for risk-reduction in YAs with LCIS. This underuse appears dependent on disparities in provider recommendation practices rather than non-acceptance of therapy. This may reflect regional practice patterns, community standards of care, or provider bias regarding the significance of LCIS as a risk factor for development of invasive cancer.     

Disparities in quality of care for colon cancer between hospitals in the Netherlands

BackgroundAim of this study was to describe treatment patterns and outcome according to region, and according to hospital types and volumes among patients with colon cancer in the Netherlands.MethodsAll patients with invasive colon carcinoma diagnosed in the period 2001–2006 were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Logistic regression analyses were performed to examine the influence of relevant factors on the odds of having adequate lymph node evaluation, receiving adjuvant chemotherapy and postoperative mortality. Relative survival analysis was used to estimate relative excess risk of dying according to hospital type and volume.ResultsIn total, 39 907 patients were selected. Patients diagnosed in a university hospital had a higher odds (OR 2.47; 95% CI 2.19–2.78) and patients diagnosed in a hospital with >100 colon carcinoma diagnoses annually had a lower odds (OR 0.70; 95% CI 0.64–0.77) of having ≥10 lymph nodes evaluated. The odds of receiving adjuvant chemotherapy was lower in patients diagnosed in teaching hospitals (OR 0.85; 95% CI 0.73–0.98) and university hospitals (OR 0.56; 95% CI 0.45–0.70) compared to patients diagnosed in non-teaching hospitals. Funnel plots showed large variation in these two outcome measures between individual hospitals. No differences in postoperative mortality were found between hospital types or volumes. Patients diagnosed in university hospitals and patients diagnosed in hospitals with >50 diagnoses of colon carcinoma per year had a better survival.ConclusionsVariation in treatment and outcome of patients with colon cancer in the Netherlands was revealed, with differences between hospital types and volumes. However, variation seemed mainly based on the level of the individual hospital.     

Features Associated With Long-Term Survival in Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer

BackgroundOf women diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer (MBC), 20% to 30% survive ≥5 years. We evaluated data from a large breast cancer program to identify features associated with MBC survival.Patients and MethodsWomen diagnosed with MBC in or after 1999 were included. Long-term MBC survival was defined as ≥5 years from date of MBC diagnosis (n = 122), short-term MBC survival as ≤2 years (n = 191). Differences were assessed using t tests, Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney tests, χ², and Fisher exact tests. Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated using multivariate logistic regression models.ResultsLong-term survivors were significantly (P < .05) younger, premenopausal, partnered, had estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, progesterone receptor-positive, and HER2-positive disease, lower Charlson Comorbidity Index, lower rates of visceral metastases, and higher household income. After adjustment for potential confounders, de novo MBC, premenopausal status, ER-positive status, and HER2-positive status remained significantly positively associated with long-term survival (respectively: OR, 2.68 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.48-4.88]; OR, 1.96 [95% CI, 1.02-3.79]; OR, 3.74 [95% CI, 1.72-8.14]; OR, 2.88 [95% CI, 1.61-5.14]). Triple-negative status, visceral with bone metastases, and brain metastases remained negatively associated with long-term survival (respectively: OR, 0.12 [95% CI, 0.05-0.29]; OR, 0.18 [95% CI, 0.07-0.47]; OR, 0.16 [95% CI, 0.04-0.60]). Partner status and household income were significant in univariate but not multivariate analyses.ConclusionDiagnosis of de novo MBC, premenopausal status, ER-positive status, and HER2-positive status were positively associated whereas triple-negative status, brain metastases, and visceral with bone metastases were inversely associated with long-term survival. These findings can be applied to better prognosticate survival for MBC patients.