Support and perceived barriers to implementing pre-exposure prophylaxis screening and dispensing in pharmacies: Examining concordance between pharmacy technicians and pharmacists

ObjectivesRecent legislation to expand pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) screening and dispensing in pharmacies may significantly improve PrEP access for people at a high risk of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) transmission. Studies have shown that pharmacists show wide support for PrEP expansion in pharmacies. However, pharmacy technicians are often the first point of contact for patients in pharmacies and are required to implement many of the tasks to ensure patients of a pharmacy receive adequate services. The purpose of this study was to assess pharmacists’ and pharmacy technicians’ perspectives regarding the implementation of PrEP screening and dispensing.MethodsWe qualitatively examined whether pharmacy technicians’ (n = 6) support and perceived barriers to screening and dispensing PrEP in pharmacies were concordant with those of pharmacists (n = 7). Pharmacy staff were recruited from high-risk HIV neighborhoods in Atlanta, GA using AIDSVu (Atlanta, GA). Two independent coders used MAXQDA (Berlin, Germany) and performed thematic data analysis and unitization to determine agreement.ResultsPharmacists and pharmacy technicians expressed strong willingness and support for screening and dispensing PrEP in pharmacies. Both groups expressed concerns about the time and the resources needed to perform PrEP screening and dispensing. Technicians, however, also reported concerns about privacy for patients, the need for community support and awareness of pharmacy-based PrEP screening, and recommended scheduling of PrEP screening activities during a limited part of the day to facilitate screening. Pharmacists reported fewer barriers but reported a need for more training of pharmacy staff to assist with PrEP screening and dispensing implementation.ConclusionPharmacy technicians discussed more barriers compared with pharmacists who were largely centered around practical considerations (i.e., logistics and workflow) that may affect the success of PrEP screening and dispensing. Given technicians’ pivotal role in the pharmacy, implementation of pharmacy-based PrEP services should address technicians’ perceived barriers in addition to those of pharmacists.     

Clinical impact of a community pharmacy-based health and wellness introductory pharmacy practice experience

ObjectiveTo assess the clinical impact of an intensive community pharmacy-based Health and Wellness Introductory Pharmacy Practice Experience (IPPE) completed by second-year (P2) student pharmacists.DesignThe Health and Wellness IPPE was a 1-week rotation developed to provide P2 student pharmacists with opportunities to provide clinical services to patients within the community pharmacy setting. Student pharmacists administered immunizations, performed blood pressure screenings and blood glucose measurements, and provided education to patients under the guidance of licensed pharmacist preceptors.Setting and participantsSecond-year student pharmacists completing a required Health and Wellness IPPE rotation in the community pharmacy setting.Outcomes measuredStudent pharmacist interventions were assessed to determine the course’s clinical impact, and preceptors were surveyed regarding the feasibility of student pharmacists performing clinical services at their training sites.ResultsA total of 147 student pharmacists completed the IPPE at 89 community pharmacy training sites and administered 9392 injections, 90% of which were influenza vaccinations. Student pharmacists performed 3458 patient health assessments, including measuring patients’ blood pressure and blood glucose and reviewing patient education materials. Most preceptors indicated that core activities were feasible during the experience.ConclusionThis study found that implementing a concentrated IPPE focused on immunizations and health screenings allowed student pharmacists to enhance their clinical skills and fulfill a large public health need, improving patient outcomes. Future studies should explore utilizing student pharmacists in community pharmacy settings to expand clinical services offered beyond these 2 services, such as diabetes risk tests, influenza point-of-care testing, and smoking cessation counseling.     

Examining the association between the “My Pharmacist” model and the service quality of community pharmacies

BackgroundIn Japan, patients can freely choose medical facilities. Many visit different medical facilities for different diseases, and for convenience, often utilize the pharmacies neighboring these facilities. Accordingly, a “My Pharmacy” model was recommended, in which patients select a single pharmacy using their own judgement to receive proper medication services. A “My Pharmacist” model, in which the pharmacist is constantly involved in the treatment of a patient, was also proposed. However, patients’ evaluations of pharmacist/pharmacy services under these models have not been investigated.ObjectiveTo examine how a patient's constant involvement with the same pharmacist and pharmacy is associated with their evaluation of the quality of pharmacy services.MethodsA cross-sectional survey using a self-administered questionnaire was conducted among patients who used pharmacies periodically. Patients evaluated the pharmacist/pharmacy services and were classified into 4 groups (“My Pharmacy/My Pharmacist,” “My Pharmacy/Multiple Pharmacists,” “Multiple Pharmacies/My Pharmacist,” and “Multiple Pharmacies/Multiple Pharmacists”) according to the form of their usage of pharmacies and pharmacists. An intergroup comparison was then performed and correlations within each group analyzed.ResultsData from 3,492 individuals using 147 pharmacies were analyzed. “My Pharmacy” users had significantly higher scores than did “Multiple Pharmacies” users on patient experience of proper medication services (e.g., identifying duplicate medication) (p < 0.001). “My Pharmacy/My Pharmacist” users scored higher than the other three groups on four evaluation factors, including “pharmacy/pharmacist's interpersonal services” (“sharing and utilizing patient information,” “enhanced health support function,” and “consideration towards patients”), “patient satisfaction with the pharmacy,” “placing more emphasis on quality of interaction with pharmacist than on waiting time,” and “attitude when visiting healthcare facilities” (all p < 0.001).ConclusionThe findings indicate that highly tailored, in-person services provided by “My Pharmacists” are associated with not only with the degree of patients’ overall satisfaction, but also their evaluation of “the quality of pharmacist services.”     

Opportunities and responsibilities for pharmacists on short-term medical mission teams

BackgroundAmerican medical mission teams commonly travel to developing countries for short-term provision of clinical services. Although medications play an important role in the work of these teams, how to plan and organize a mission field pharmacy has been seldom described in the literature.ObjectiveTo describe pharmacist participation in medical mission work.SummaryGlobal standards and policies, as well as traditional best practices, should be applied to the selection, acquisition, use, and disposition of medications taken into a host country. This report describes the roles and responsibilities of pharmacists in planning and organizing a mission pharmacy and in delivering quality pharmacy services in the field.ConclusionPharmacists have an important contribution to make to medical mission teams. Pharmacist knowledge of drug products, regulatory issues, medication storage, dispensing, patient consultation, therapeutic substitution, and pharmacy organization and workflow is ideally suited for mission field work.     

Pharmacy benefits management and ambulatory pharmacy services

The business of pharmacy is changing dramatically as new components are added to our health care system and new terms developed to describe existing functions. For example, payment for pharmacy products and services are increasingly coming under control of Pharmacy Benefits Management (PBM) companies who are also racing to develop Disease State Management Programs. Additionally, health care purchasers have welcomed the development of HEDIS (Health Employer Data Information Set) as another tool to evaluate both the cost and quality of health care provided to their enrollees. All this means pharmacy will have to change its paradigm from dispensing to managing the medication consumption/compliance process in addition to traditional dispensing activities.     

Strengthening pandemic preparedness through pharmacy and public health collaborations: Findings from a facilitated discussion exercise

BackgroundCommunity pharmacists are key partners to public health agencies during pandemics and other emergencies. Community pharmacy and public health agencies can establish memoranda of understanding (MOUs) for dispensing and administering medical countermeasures and providing related services to affected population(s) during a public health incident.ObjectiveThe objective of this facilitated discussion exercise was to identify the strengths and opportunities associated with the activation of a statewide pharmacy–public health agencies MOU with community pharmacists on the basis of a simulated pandemic influenza event.MethodsA facilitated discussion exercise was held in the Puget Sound region of the State of Washington in May 2017. The participants included pharmacists from 2 community pharmacy organizations, emergency preparedness officials from 2 local health departments and the state health department, staff of the state pharmacy association, and faculty from a school of pharmacy. The evaluators recorded the discussions and observations, augmented by a postexercise telephone call with participants from each of the participating community pharmacy organizations. Key themes from the exercise are reported.ResultsFive themes were identified during the facilitated discussion exercise. Two themes described the strengths of the MOU and its operational plan: (1) collaboration strengthens preparedness and response planning, and (2) an MOU provides a framework for effective collaboration. Three themes acknowledged the opportunities to optimize activation of the existing MOU: (1) early and active engagement between health department personnel and community pharmacists, (2) establishing pharmacy policies and procedures to support readiness and response, and (3) addressing the training or other educational needs of community pharmacists.ConclusionThis exercise provided community pharmacists and public health agency personnel an opportunity to better plan for responding to a pandemic. The open dialogue in this facilitated discussion allowed the exercise participants to identify the strengths, priorities, and perspectives as well as the gaps in the MOU operational plan. The lessons learned in this exercise can inform the community pharmacy and public health response to the coronavirus disease pandemic.     

Recommendations and guidance for providing pharmaceutical care services during COVID-19 pandemic: A China perspective

BackgroundThe novel coronavirus pneumonia (COVID-19), which was first detected in Wuhan City, has now became a pandemic that affecting patients around the world. Particularly, the community patient population are at high risk of infection and are facing potential failure of proper medication use during the pandemic.ObjectiveTo discuss community pharmacists’ role and the content of pharmaceutical care (PC) during the novel coronavirus pandemic to promote effective prevention and control and safe drug use of the community patient population.MethodCollect and summarize the experience Chinese community pharmacies gained from providing pharmacy services during the COVID-19 outbreak, and taking patients' PC needs into consideration, analyze and discuss the methods and strategies that community pharmacies and pharmacists shall use to provide PC during the pandemic.ResultsCommunity pharmacy management teams shall support PC services by providing adequate supply of COVID-19 related medications and preventative products, following environment regulations, and providing sufficient staff trainings. Pharmacists shall use various approaches to provide PC services in drug dispensing, consulting and referrals, chronic disease management, safe use of infusions, patient education, home care guidance and psychological support to promote the COVID-19 pandemic control and ensure safe medication use of community patients during the pandemic.ConclusionPC services in communities during the COVID-19 shall possess different properties due to disease characteristics and related change in patients' need. Community pharmacies shall work as a strong supporter of patient's medication and protective equipment supply. Community pharmacists shall be prepared to provide skilled and effective PC services for community patient population to ensure medication safety and promote the overall COVID-19 pandemic control.     

Pharmacist-reported practice change as a result of a statewide community pharmacy accreditation program

ObjectivesTo assess pharmacist-reported practice change as a result of participation in a community pharmacy accreditation program.SettingCommunity pharmacy practice in Wisconsin.Practice innovationThe Wisconsin Pharmacy Quality Collaborative (WPQC) is a network of pharmacies and pharmacists who provide standardized pharmacy services. WPQC is based on a unique set of quality-based best practices designed to improve patient safety in the medication use process. WPQC is supported by the statewide pharmacy organization, the Pharmacy Society of Wisconsin (PSW), which provides resources focused on implementation and engagement to support the success of WPQC-accredited pharmacies.Program evaluationPSW used a 24-question online survey to evaluate the degree of pharmacist-reported practice change as a result of the WPQC quality-based best practices.ResultsPharmacist-reported frequency and consistency of all quality-based best practices and services increased after WPQC accreditation (P < 0.05), with the exception of robotic dispensing systems, holding regular staff meetings for team communication, and providing incentives for recording quality-related events. In addition, quality-based best practices and WPQC services had a positive impact on pharmacist perceptions of their quality of patient care, patient safety, patient satisfaction, and patient relationships in WPQC-accredited pharmacies. The majority of pharmacies valued WPQC accreditation and shared positive comments about their experiences.ConclusionA community pharmacy accreditation program using standardized quality-based best practices can create and reinforce behavior change in the community pharmacy setting to positively affect patient care and medication safety. Research is needed to determine if there are actual behavior changes as a result of WPQC accreditation compared with pharmacies that have elected not to participate.     

Analysis of the information and support needs generated by a community pharmacy‐based methadone treatment programme

Background — Methadone treatment has been provided in Ireland since 1998 under the methadone protocol scheme. Two liaison pharmacists were employed by the Eastern Health Board to interface between pharmacists dispensing methadone in primary and tertiary care. Objective — To analyse and review the inquiries received and addressed by one liaison pharmacist in the first year of operation of a community pharmacy‐based methadone treatment scheme. Method — Inquiries received were recorded by the pharmacist using a standard data collection form. Using content analysis, key themes were identified and each inquiry was classified. Data were analysed using standard computer software. Key findings — Two primary categories of liaison inquiry were addressed: “patient‐related” inquiries, requiring the organisation of community pharmacy‐based methadone dispensing services for patients, and “pharmacy‐related” inquiries, which were requests from community pharmacists for information or support. Two thirds of the inquiries were “patient‐related.” The primary users of the liaison service were prescribers employed by the addiction services and community pharmacists. Conclusion — The liaison pharmacy service handled diverse inquiries, with an emphasis on the facilitation of the provision of pharmaceutical care for patients requiring community pharmacy‐based methadone dispensing services. The liaison service had a significant secondary role in the provision of support and information for community pharmacists. The study findings are of relevance to those involved in developing and introducing primary care‐based services for drug misusers.