The impact of chronic kidney disease on bariatric perioperative outcome: a MBSAQIP matched analysis

BackgroundMorbid obesity is considered a strong independent risk factor for chronic kidney disease (CKD), and bariatric surgery remains the most effective treatment for obesity-related co-morbidities. Previous large database analyses have suggested that CKD does not independently increase the risk of adverse outcomes after bariatric surgery. The safety of elective bariatric surgery in this patient population remains unclear. To this end, we compared 30-day outcomes in this patient population after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.ObjectivesTo compare 30-day outcomes in CKD patients after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy or gastric bypass.SettingUniversity Hospital, United States.MethodsUsing the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation Quality Improvement Program database, we identified patients with CKD who underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in 2015 or 2016. An unmatched cohort analysis, a propensity-matched analysis, and a case-control, matched-cohort analysis was performed of patients with and without CKD.ResultsOf the 302,092 patients included in this study, 2362 (.7%) had CKD, of whom 837 (35.4%) required dialysis. CKD patients were older with significantly higher rates of co-morbid conditions. Hospital length of stay, intensive care unit admission, reoperation, readmission, bleeding, cardiopulmonary, infectious complications, and total morbidity were significantly higher in CKD patients. In propensity-matched and case-control matched analyses of 4006 patients and 2264 patients, respectively, poorer outcomes in CKD patients highlight it an independent risk factor for morbidity.ConclusionsIn contrast to previously reported large database analysis, CKD and dependence on dialysis independently increases the risk of 30-day adverse outcomes after primary bariatric surgery. The benefits conferred by bariatric surgery should be carefully weighed against the increased risk of complications in this challenging population.     

Dehydration risk factors and impact after bariatric surgery: an analysis using a national database

BackgroundDehydration is a common complication after bariatric surgery and often quoted as the reason for emergency department (ED) visits and readmission.ObjectiveWe sought to investigate risk factors for dehydration after bariatric surgery and evaluate its impact on ED visits and readmission.SettingThe Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program database.MethodsWe used the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program database to identify patients who underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy or laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) from 2016 through 2017. The primary outcome was need for outpatient treatment of dehydration within 30 days postsurgery. Secondary outcomes were association between need for outpatient dehydration therapy and 30-day readmission or ED evaluation not resulting in admission.ResultsOf 256,817 patients, 73% underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and 27% LRYGB. Of 9592 patients who required dehydration treatment, they were more often younger than age 40, female, black, had a ≥3-day length of stay during their index admission, and experienced a postoperative complication. More patients receiving LRYGB than laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy required treatment for dehydration. On multivariable analysis, independent-risk factors for postoperative dehydration treatment included LRYGB, length of stay ≥3 days, gastroesophageal reflux disease, hypertension, previous deep vein thrombosis, chronic steroid/immunosuppression, and a postoperative complication. Patients who developed dehydration requiring treatment compared with those that did not had adjusted odds ratio of 3.7 (95% confidence interval: 3.44–3.96; P < .001) and 22 (95% confidence interval: 21.05–23.06; P < .001) of readmission and ED visit.ConclusionDehydration is a strong risk factor for postoperative ED visits and readmission. Closer surveillance and proactive measures for those at higher risk may prevent the development of postoperative dehydration.     

The effect of bougie size and distance from the pylorus on dehydration after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: an analysis of the ACS-MBSAQIP database

BackgroundDehydration is the most common cause of readmission after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SG). Bougie size and distance from the pylorus, both of which have been associated with rates of dehydration postoperatively, varies by surgeon and across institutions.ObjectivesTo determine if there is an association between bougie size or distance from the pylorus on the rate of dehydration after laparoscopic SG.SettingAmerican College of Surgeons Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation Quality Improvement Program database.MethodsAll patients undergoing first-time, elective laparoscopic SG from 2015–2016 were identified. The association of bougie size and distance from the pylorus on the rate of dehydration within the first 30 days postoperatively was investigated.ResultsThe inclusion criteria were met by 170,751 patients. The most commonly used bougie size was 36 Fr and the most common distance from the pylorus at which the gastric sleeve was started was 5 cm. Patients were divided into 4 groups based on bougie size and distance from the pylorus (Group 1: bougie size <36 Fr, pylorus distance <4 cm; Group 2: bougie size ≥36 Fr, pylorus distance <4 cm; Group 3: bougie size ≥36 Fr, pylorus distance ≥4 cm; and Group 4: bougie size <36 Fr, pylorus distance ≥4 cm). Patients in Group 4 were significantly less likely than any other group to experience dehydration-related complications.ConclusionBoth distance from the pylorus and bougie size are significantly associated with dehydration-related complications after SG. Consideration should be made for standardizing these technical aspects of SG to help reduce the rate of postoperative dehydration and hospital readmission.     

Rates of reoperation and nonoperative intervention within 30 days of bariatric surgery

BackgroundComplications arising from laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) are not insignificant and can necessitate additional invasive interventions or reoperations.ObjectivesIn this study, we identify early complications that result in nonoperative and operative interventions after LSG and LRYGB, the timeframe within which to expect them, and factors that influence the likelihood of their occurrence.SettingMulti-institutional database from across North America.MethodsData for this study were obtained from Metabolic and Bariatric Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program participant use files for 2015 and 2016. Statistical analysis was performed using STATA 15. Univariate analysis using Χ² for categoric data and independent t test for continuous data was performed to determine between group differences. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to identify predictors of operative and nonoperative reinterventions.ResultsIn 2015 and 2016, 243,747 underwent LRYGB or LSG, of which 3013 (1.24%) required a second operative procedure and 1536 (0.63%) required an invasive but nonoperative intervention. Complications occurred in 5.48% of LRYGB patients and 2.28% of LSG patients, the most common of which was bleeding. LSG was associated with far fewer nonoperative and operative interventions (.85% versus 2.2%, respectively) than LRYGB (.67% versus 2.5%). Renal insufficiency, including dialysis dependency, was an important predictor of reoperations among bariatric surgery patients. This was also true of nonoperative interventions; however, history of pulmonary embolism, and use of therapeutic anticoagulation were marginally stronger predictors.ConclusionsIn a representative, multinational sample, operative and nonoperative interventions were half as likely among LSG patients compared with LRYGB; however, overall rates still remained low. These findings, in conjunction with new efficacy data demonstrating comparable long-term weight loss between LRYGB and LSG, provide further support for the safety, effectiveness, and cost efficiency of LSG.     

Safety of bariatric surgery in patients older than 65 years

BackgroundThe increase in life expectancy along with the obesity epidemic has led to an increase in the number of older patients undergoing bariatric surgery. There is conflicting evidence regarding the safety of performing bariatric procedures on older patients.ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to compare the safety of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) for older patients (>65 yr).SettingNationwide analysis of accredited centers.MethodsThe Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program 2015 to 2017 database was used to identify nonrevisional laparoscopic RYGB and SG procedures. Comparisons were made based on patient age. Clinical outcomes included postoperative events and mortality.ResultsThere was a total 13,422 and 5395 matched pairs for SG and RYGB in comparing patients aged 18 years to those aged 65 and >65 years, respectively, and 5395 matched RYGB and SG procedures performed in patients >65 years. The complication rate was higher in older patients undergoing RYGB compared with SG (risk difference = 2.39%, 95% confidence interval: 1.57%–3.21%, P < .0001). When comparing older to younger patients, the older group had a higher complication rate for SG but not for RYGB (SG: risk difference = 1.01%, 95% confidence interval: .59%–1.43%, P < .0001, RYGB: risk difference = .59%, 95% confidence interval: ?.29% to 1.47%, P = .2003).ConclusionsOverall complication rates of bariatric surgery are low in patients >65 years. SG appears to have a favorable safety profile in this patient population compared with RYGB. The overall complication rate for RYGB is not significantly different between the older and younger groups.     

Operative time as a marker of quality in bariatric surgery

BackgroundFew studies have examined the effect of prolonged operative time (OT) on outcomes in laparoscopic bariatric surgery. Existing studies mostly focus on 30-day complications, whereas serious complications may not occur until well after 30 days from the index operation.ObjectiveTo determine the effect of prolonged OT on 1-year morbidity and mortality after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG).SettingThe Bariatric Outcomes Longitudinal Database (BOLD).MethodsData on primary LRYGB and LSG cases performed between 2008 and 2012 in the BOLD were analyzed. Converted cases and cases concurrent with other procedures were excluded. Multivariate logistic regression was used to assess the association between OT and 1-year morbidity and mortality, with adjustment for preoperative demographic and clinical characteristics.ResultsA total of 93,051 cases were examined, including 74,745 (80.3%) LRYGB and 18,306 (19.7%) LSG cases. For LRYGB, mean OT was 104 minutes (standard deviation [SD] 46.6). Every additional 10 minutes of OT was associated with increased odds of 1-year mortality (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 1.04; P = .02), leak (AOR 1.07; P < .0001), and any adverse event (AOR 1.03; P < .001). For LSG, mean OT was 78 minutes (SD 37.4). Every additional 10 minutes of OT was associated with increased odds of 1-year leak (AOR 1.07; P = .0002). Data on patients lost to follow-up was unavailable.ConclusionProlonged operative time is associated with a significant increase in the odds of mortality and serious complications after laparoscopic bariatric surgery. Operative time may be a useful marker of quality in primary laparoscopic bariatric surgery.     

Trends in revisional bariatric surgery using the MBSAQIP database 2015-2017

BackgroundThe third most common bariatric surgery is revisional bariatric surgery. The American College of Surgeons tracks outcomes using the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation Quality Initiative Program database. We used this database to examine trends in revisional bariatric surgery.ObjectiveTo evaluate how trends in bariatric revisional surgery have changed in recent years.SettingUniversity Hospital, United States.MethodsThe Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation Quality Initiative Program database for 2015 to 2017 was examined for revisions of bariatric surgery. Patients who underwent revisional bariatric surgery were identified by the primary Current Procedural Terminology code, the REVCONV and PREVIOUS_SURGERY field as well as secondary Current Procedural Terminology codes. There is no exact code for sleeve gastrectomy (SG) to laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB), so we used 43644 (GB)+REVCONV+PREVIOUS_SURGERY for this.ResultsFor the years 2015 to 2017 there were 57,683 revisions/conversions of 528,081 patients. The number of revisions increased over the study period by 5213 cases. The most common revision was laparoscopic adjustable gastric band (LAGB) to SG with 15,433 cases and the second was LAGB to LRYGB with 10,485 cases. There were 14,715 LAGB removals. It is more difficult to track SG to LRYGB but there were 8491 unlisted cases, which may have been sleeve to bypass.ConclusionLAGBs are being taken out or converted, and this group makes up the largest portion of revisions and conversions. It is difficult to track SG to LRYGB, but the number of unlisted cases continues to climb. This will likely surpass LAGB conversions with time. The Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation Quality Initiative Program should be modified to capture revisions/conversions of SG.     

Racial disparities in perioperative outcomes after bariatric surgery

BackgroundNonHispanic black patients bear a disproportionate burden of the obesity epidemic and its related medical co-morbidities. While bariatric surgery is the most effective treatment for morbid obesity, black patients access bariatric surgery at lower rates than nonHispanic white patients.ObjectivesTo examine racial differences before bariatric surgery and in short-term perioperative outcomes and complications, and the extent to which race is independently associated with perioperative morbidity and mortality.SettingMetabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program national database.MethodsData were extracted from the 2015 Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program Participant Use File. Multivariate analysis was used to identify differences in mortality, length of stay, readmission, and reintervention by race in patients undergoing laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass or laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SG).ResultsA total of 108,198 patients were included in the analysis. There were significant differences in perioperative disease burden. Black patients had a higher body mass index at the time they underwent surgery (laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: 48.0 versus 45.7 kg/m²; SG: 46.8 versus 44.9 kg/m²; P < .001). Black patients had significantly longer length of stay and higher rates of readmission in both the laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and SG groups. In the SG group, black patients had significantly higher 30-day mortality (.2% versus .1%, odds ratio = 3.613, 95% confidence interval 1.990–6.558, P < .001) and higher rates of reoperation or reintervention.ConclusionsWe found significant racial disparities in bariatric surgery outcomes, including higher mortality in black patients undergoing SG. The specific causes of these disparities remain unclear and must be the subject of future research.     

Comparative analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic revisional bariatric surgery: perioperative outcomes from the MBSAQIP database

BackgroundThere are limited data evaluating the role of robotics in revisional bariatric surgery (RBS) compared with laparoscopy.ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to compare perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic and robotic RBS.SettingThe Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) database.MethodsThe 2015 to 2017 MBSAQIP database was queried for patients undergoing revisional robotic and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). Multivariate logistic regression was used to compare outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic approaches, adjusting for demographic characteristics, co-morbidities, and operative time.ResultsA total of 17,012 patients underwent revisional SG with 15,935 (93.7%) laparoscopic and 1077 (6.3%) robotic, and 12,442 patients underwent revisional RYGB with 11,212 (90.1%) laparoscopic and 1230 (9.9%) robotic. Overall morbidity was higher in robotic SG compared with laparoscopic SG (6.7% versus 4.5%; adjusted odds ratio 1.51; P < .01) which was not the case after adjustment for operative time. Robotic RYGB was associated with comparable overall morbidity to laparoscopic (9.3% versus 11.6%; adjusted odds ratio .83; P = .07) although respiratory complications, pneumonia, superficial surgical site infections, and postoperative bleeding were lower with robotic RYGB. The robotic approach with both procedures was associated with longer operative time (P < .01). Length of stay was longer in the robotic group for SG (P < .01) but was not different for RYGB (P = .91).ConclusionsRobotic RBS has an increased complication profile compared with the laparoscopic approach for SG and decreased for RYGB. Further analysis is needed regarding variability in surgeon technique and operative experience to determine what factors contribute to these differences.     

Factors influencing long-term weight loss after bariatric surgery

BackgroundBariatric surgery provides sustained weight loss and improves comorbidities. However, long term data has shown that patients gradually regain weight after 1 year. Several factors have been associated with poor weight loss after bariatric surgery.ObjectiveOur goal is to investigate factors associated with poor weight loss following laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB).SettingMilitary academic medical center.MethodsRetrospective review of 247 patients who underwent laparoscopic SG or RYGB between 2010–2012 at Eisenhower Army Medical Center and followed for 5 years postoperatively. Factors of age, type of surgery, sex, hypertension, depression, and type 2 diabetes (T2D) are analyzed in univariate and multivariate analysis with percent total weight loss (%TWL) and Body Mass Index (BMI) change as primary endpoints measured at 3 and 5 years.ResultsAverage BMI change are maximized at 1 year and decreased at 3 and 5 years post-surgery. Age, diabetes, hypertension and type of surgery significantly influenced weight loss at 3 and 5 years on univariate analysis. However, patients with diabetes, hypertension and sleeve gastrectomy were significantly older than comparable control group. Multivariable analysis showed that age and type of surgery, not diabetes or hypertension, were associated with poor %TWL and BMI change at 3 and 5 years.ConclusionWhile presence of hypertension and diabetes initially appeared to be associated with weight recidivism, their impacts were negligible on multivariable analysis. However, age and sleeve gastrectomy are independent risk factors. Our data can be used to counsel patients on expected weight loss after bariatric surgery.     

Outcomes of adolescents compared with young adults after bariatric surgery: an analysis of 227,671 patients using the MBSAQIP data registry

BackgroundObesity in the United States is increasingly prevalent in adolescents. Metabolic and bariatric surgery is offered at select sites to adolescents (<18 yr). Controversy exists regarding the safety of performing metabolic and bariatric surgery in adolescents.ObjectivesThe Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program registry was employed to compare outcomes of adolescents with adults (18–40 yr) undergoing sleeve gastrectomy (SG) or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB).SettingAcademic Teaching Institution.MethodsThe Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program Participant User Files were reviewed for patients undergoing SG or RYGB (2015–2018). Patients were stratified by age and outcomes for adolescents versus adults compared. A bivariate analysis was performed on propensity-matched data.ResultsAfter exclusion criteria were applied, 227,671 patients <40 years remained, of whom 1005 were adolescents. For those undergoing RYGB (13.8% adolescents, 25.3% adults), demographic characteristics were similar. Adolescent SG patients were more likely to be male and Hispanic, but less likely to be smokers or have preoperative co-morbidities. There were no differences in infection rates, mortality, major complications, reoperation, readmission, or other interventions for RYGB and SG groups. For both adult SG and adolescent SG, patients’ operative times were less than adult and adolescent RYGB, respectively. However, operative times were shorter for adolescent RYGB versus adult RYGB patients, yet longer for adolescent SG patients versus adult SG patients.ConclusionsMetabolic and bariatric surgery is as safe for adolescents undergoing an SG or RYGB as adults. Currently, SG is more commonly performed in adolescents than RYGB, and adolescent SG patients have similar outcomes and shorter operating room times compared with adolescent RYGB patients.     

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with loop bipartition: A novel metabolic operation in treating obese type II diabetes mellitus

INTRODUCTIONWe report the first case of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with loop bipartition (a modified form of Santoro's operation) in the treatment of type II diabetes mellitus associated with obesity.PRESENTATION OF CASEA 46-year-old gentleman (baseline BMI 32.9; BW 98.5 kg) with 7-year history of type II diabetes mellitus (DM) underwent the procedure in Hong Kong. The control of DM was poor even with intensive medical therapy before the operation. Standard laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SG) was performed and a loop gastroileostomy was fashioned at the antrum 250 cm from the ilececal valve without division of the 1st part of duodenum after SG. The resultant gastric tube has two outlets, one to the first part of duodenum and the other to the ileum with preferential passage of food through the gastroileostomy as shown on subsequent contrast study. The patient's recovery was uneventful. The excess BMI loss was 97% with complete normalization of all metabolic parameters at 1-year follow-up.DISCUSSIONThis new surgical procedure (sleeve gastrectomy with loop bipartition: SG+LB) was evolved and derived from the combined concepts of sleeve gastrectomy with transit bipartition (SG+TB), single anastomosis duodenal-ileostomy (SADI), mini-gastric bypass (MGB) and duodenal-jejunal bypass (DJB) with less nutritional and surgical complications.CONCLUSIONSleeve gastrectomy with loop bipartition may be a very effective and simple operation to treat uncontrolled DM associated with obesity with a lot of apparent advantages over most current metabolic procedures available at the moment.     

Is age a real or perceived discriminator for bariatric surgery? A long-term analysis of bariatric surgery in the elderly

BackgroundBariatric surgery is the most effective treatment of obesity. There are few studies evaluating long-term outcomes in elderly patients.ObjectivesOur study was designed to evaluate the safety and long-term outcomes of bariatric surgery in the elderly compared with a contemporary medically managed cohort.SettingUniversity hospital.MethodsThree hundred thirty-seven patients age ≥60 who underwent a sleeve gastrectomy or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass between January 2007 and April 2017 were identified (ElderSurg) and compared with a matched cohort of medically managed elderly patients with obesity (ElderNonSurg).ResultsThirty-two patients underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, 190 underwent laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, and 115 underwent open Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. The cohort was a mean of 64.4-years old, 75.4% female, mean preoperative body mass index was 46.9, and 62.6% had type 2 diabetes. During a median follow-up period of 56.2 months (confidence interval 49.5–62.9), mean percent excess weight loss (EWL) at nadir was 72.1 ± 24.7% and EWL at 36 months or beyond was 60.9 ± 27.6%. On regression analysis, diabetes, body mass index, and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy were negatively associated with EWL at all time periods (P < .05). Mean %EWL was greater for Roux-en-Y gastric bypass compared with laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (61.7 versus 41.2; P = .039). Diabetes remission rate was 45.8%. There was a statistically significant decrease in the risk of death in ElderSurg (hazard ratio .584, 95% confidence interval .362–.941) compared with ElderNonSurg.ConclusionsOur study supports that bariatric surgery is safe in elderly patients with effective long-term control of obesity, diabetes, and with improved overall survival.     

First assistant impact on early morbidity and mortality in bariatric surgery

BackgroundThe future of bariatric surgery depends largely on how effectively residents and fellows are trained. The challenge is to assure patient safety during training. Our study compares the impact of first assistants on patient outcomes after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy.MethodsA retrospective review of primary, elective Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy procedures performed in 2015 and 2016 from the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program participant user files was performed. Patient cohorts were categorized by the level of training of the surgical first assistant (FA). Multivariate regression models were developed to determine the impact of the FA level on patient outcomes, adjusting for patient demographic characteristics and co-morbid conditions.ResultsCompared with an attending weight loss surgeon as FA, minimally invasive surgery fellows and general surgery residents were more likely to have an unplanned admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) within 30 days (odds ratio [OR] 1.422, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.196–1.691; OR 1.206, 95% CI 1.034–1.406, respectively, P < .0001) and were more likely to have a 30-day hospital readmission (OR 1.143, 95% CI 1.056–1.236; OR 1.127, 95% CI 1.055–1.204, respectively, P < .0001). Compared with having a weight loss surgeon as FA, operative duration was significantly longer for all other assistant levels, or no assistant (P < .0001).ConclusionThe training level of the FA does not impact early patient mortality or reoperation rates after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy. However, unplanned intensive care unit admissions and readmissions within 30 days were significantly associated with surgical resident or minimally invasive surgery fellow FAs. Further analysis is needed to understand this cause and effect; however, these data provide direction to redesign residency and fellowship training.     

Bariatric surgery in the elderly: outcomes analysis of patients over 70 using the ACS-NSQIP database

BackgroundBariatric surgery offers patients with morbid obesity and related diseases short- and long-term benefits to their health and quality of life. Evidence-based medicine is integral in the evaluation of risk versus benefit; however, data are lacking for several high-risk patient populations, including the elderly.ObjectivesThis study assessed morbidity and mortality data for patients age ≥70 undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SG) or laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB).SettingUniversity Hospital, Bronx, New York, United States using national database.MethodsWe used the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Project database for years 2005–2016 and identified patients who underwent primary SG or RYGB. Patients age ≥70 were assigned to the over age 70 (AGE70+) cohort and younger patients were assigned to the under age 70 (U70) cohort. Postoperative length of stay and 30-day morbidity and mortality were assessed.ResultsA total of 1498 patients age ≥70 underwent nonrevisional bariatric surgery, including 751 (50.1%) SG and 747 (49.9%) RYGB. AGE70+ was associated with increased mortality and increased rates of cardiac, pulmonary, renal, and cerebrovascular morbidity. AGE70+ patients had longer mean length of stay, and were more likely to require transfusion and return to operative room. When stratified by procedure, rates of organ-space surgical site infection, acute renal failure, urinary tract infection, myocardial infarction, deep vein thrombosis/thrombophlebitis, and septic shock were significantly increased in AGE70+ patients undergoing RYGB but not SG. Impaired functional status was associated with increased rates of morbidity and mortality for AGE70+ patients and for U70 patients, although the small number of patients within each category limited statistical analysis.ConclusionsEvaluation of risk versus benefit is performed on a case-by-case basis, but evidence-based medicine is critical in empowering surgeons and patients to make informed decisions. The overall rate of morbidity and mortality for AGE70+ patients undergoing bariatric surgery was increased relative to U70 patients. Rates of several adverse events, including acute renal failure and myocardial infarction, were increased in AGE70+ patients undergoing RYGB but not SG, suggesting that SG may be the preferred procedure for elderly patients with organ-specific risk factors. The increased rates of morbidity and mortality observed for patients with impaired functional status supports consideration of functional status when evaluating preoperative risk.     

Bariatric surgery outcomes in oxygen-dependent patients: analysis of the MBSAQIP database

BackgroundThe number of bariatric procedures performed on complex, oxygen-dependent patients has increased. These patients often have other medical co-morbidities that can be improved after bariatric surgery; however, questions remain regarding their perioperative risk.ObjectiveTo assess the safety of bariatric surgery among oxygen-dependent patients, and to compare outcomes in this patient group after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass versus laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.SettingUniversity and private hospitals enrolled in the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program data registry.MethodsThe Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program data from 2015 to 2017 was analyzed. A multivariable regression analysis was performed looking at 30-day serious complications for oxygen-dependent patients, with a secondary propensity-matched analysis performed comparing patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy versus laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.ResultsIn total, 430,396 patients were analyzed, 3034 (0.7%) of whom were oxygen dependent. The absolute 30-day complication rate among oxygen-dependent patients was more than twice as high (8.24% versus 3.46%, P < .001). The postoperative leak (.69% versus .41%, P = .017), bleed (2.08% versus .91%, P < .001), cardiac event (.16% versus .07%, P = .034), and pneumonia rate (.89% versus .19%, P < .001) were all significantly higher. Mortality was significantly higher among oxygen-dependent patients (.49% versus .09%, P < .001). On multivariable analysis, oxygen dependency was an independent predictor of adverse outcomes (odds ratio 1.30 [1.22–1.50], P < .001). Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass was associated with a statistically significant higher complication rate compared with laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (13.23% versus 5.16%, P < .001).ConclusionOxygen-dependent patients undergoing bariatric surgery are at a higher risk of both morbidity and mortality postoperatively.     

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy versus laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in the pediatric population: a MBSAQIP analysis

BackgroundThe growing prevalence of childhood obesity has resulted in an increased number of children and adolescents who undergo bariatric surgery. The safety of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) remains controversial in the pediatric population.ObjectiveTo assess the safety of LSG compared with LRYGB in patients aged ≤21 years.SettingA retrospective analysis of the 2016 to 2017 Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program database.MethodsPatients aged ≤21 years who underwent LSG or LRYGB were identified in the 2016 to 2017 Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program database. A logistic regression model was used to create a 1:1 propensity-score matched cohort adjusting for age, sex, body mass index, and obesity-related co-morbidities. Unmatched and propensity-score matched analyses were performed to compare baseline characteristics and outcome data between LSG and LRYGB procedure groups. Primary outcomes of interest included 30-day major complications, such as death, reoperation, and anastomotic leak.ResultsOf 3571 patients included in our study, 2911 (81.52%) underwent LSG and 660 (18.48%) underwent LRYGB. Patients who underwent LRYGB had an increased body mass index and a higher rate of obesity-related co-morbidities. The LRYGB group had a significantly increased rate of major complications within the first 30 days in both the unmatched cohort (4.55% versus 1.34%, P < .001) and the propensity-score matched cohort (4.57% versus .91%, P < .001).ConclusionsLSG and LRYGB are both relatively safe to perform in the pediatric population with acceptable complication rates and low mortality. However, LSG demonstrated a significantly decreased rate of major complications in the first 30 days compared with LRYGB.     

Examining the Hispanic paradox in bariatric surgery

BackgroundThe obesity rate for the Hispanic population is significantly higher than that of white, non-Hispanic people in the United States, yet Hispanic people undergo disproportionately fewer metabolic and bariatric surgery procedures. This study used the Metabolic Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program data registry to examine potential differences in preoperative co-morbidities and postoperative outcomes in Hispanic adults undergoing sleeve gastrectomy or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass procedures in the United States.ObjectivesTo study the presence of the Hispanic paradox in metabolic and bariatric surgery utilizing the MBSAQIP registry.SettingAcademic Teaching Institution.MethodsParticipant User Files from the Metabolic Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program were reviewed for patients undergoing sleeve gastrectomy or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (2015–2017). Patients were grouped by race (Hispanic versus all other races) and primary procedure performed. Variables for major and minor postoperative complications were combined. A univariate analysis was performed on unmatched and propensity-matched cohorts.ResultsAfter applying exclusions, 53,353 (13.7%) Hispanic patients and 335,299 non-Hispanic patients remained. A univariate analysis demonstrated Hispanic patients had the lowest preoperative co-morbidity profile compared with all other races and decreased rates of major and minor postoperative complications. Using matched-cohort data, when complications were assessed and grouped as major/minor complications, rates of major and minor complications in Hispanic patients were lower in the Roux-en-Y gastric bypass group, despite Hispanic patients having higher leak rates. Similarly, there were no differences between Hispanic/non-Hispanic sleeve gastrectomy patients in overall major/minor complication rates despite Hispanic patients exhibiting higher venous thromboembolism and lower bleeding compared with non-Hispanic patients.ConclusionHispanic patients undergo disproportionately low rates of metabolic and bariatric surgery procedures and present with lower incidence of preoperative co-morbidities. Additionally, Hispanic patients have the same or decreased incidence of postoperative complications compared with non-Hispanic patients, thereby corroborating the Hispanic paradox.     

Evaluating the safety of bariatric surgery for weight loss in class I obesity: A propensity-matched analysis of North American data

BackgroundBariatric surgery is an effective treatment for severe obesity. However, there has been an evolving role for bariatric surgery as a primary treatment in the management of class I obesity.ObjectivesWe aimed to assess the safety of surgery by directly comparing surgical outcomes of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) in class I obesity (body mass index [BMI] 30–35 kg/m²) with those with class II obesity (BMI 35–40 kg/m²) and higher (BMI >40 kg/m²) using an analysis of a large-scale matched-patient cohort analysis.SettingMetabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program database, United States and Canada.MethodsWe performed a retrospective analysis using the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program database, which collects patient information from >790 bariatric surgery centers in North America. Patients included in our analysis underwent surgery in the years 2015 and 2016 and had either LRYGB or LSG for weight loss.ResultsInitial analysis included 274,091 patients. Propensity-matching resulted in 9104 patients for analysis in each of the class I and class II and higher groups. The overall major complication rate between the 2 matched groups was 3.9% for class I and 3.5% for class II and higher (P = .11). We did not find that class I obesity was associated with an increased risk of 30-day complication or death.ConclusionsIn our analysis of propensity-matched patients undergoing LSG and LRYGB for weight loss, class I obesity did not have statistically higher risk of postoperative complication rates compared with class II and higher.     

Outcomes of robotic bariatric surgery in super-obese patients: first report based on MBSAQIP database

BackgroundBariatric surgery in the super-obese (SO) patient population represents a challenge. Although the robotic platform is increasingly used for these patients, there are limited data on outcomes compared with conventional laparoscopy.ObjectiveOur study compared the safety and short-term outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic platforms for SO patients compared with morbidly obese patients based on the 2015 to 2017 Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) database.SettingUniversity Hospital, United States.MethodsWe evaluated all primary robotic and laparoscopic cases and extracted 30-day outcomes in patients with body mass index <50 and ≤50 kg/m². For our primary analysis, we used the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel method with surgery type Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) versus sleeve gastrectomy (SG) as the stratification variable to determine the association between body mass index categories and outcomes.ResultsA total of 355,278 patients were included in our analysis. For the robotic RYGB (R-RYGB) group (n = 6645) and R-SG (n = 15,984) there were 1674 SO patients (25.2%) and 3688 SO patients (23.1%), respectively.For the laparoscopic RYGB (LRYGB) group (n = 95,374) and LSG group (n = 237,275), there were 24,991 (26.2%) and 51,524 SO patients (21.7%), respectively. The incidence of serious adverse events in SO patients for R-RYGB and LRYGB groups was 7.6% versus 7.2% (P > .05) and 4% versus 3.5% (P > .05) for R-SG and L-SG, respectively. The incidence of organ space infection in SO patients for R-RYGB and LRYGB groups was .5% versus .4% (P > .05) and .4% versus .2% (P < .05) for R-SG and LSG, respectively.ConclusionsBased on 2015 to 2017 Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program data, we found no difference in outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic approaches in SO patients. There was a higher incidence of serious adverse events in SO patients compared with morbidly obese patients for both approaches.