Dobutamine stress echocardiography for detection and assessment of coronary artery disease.

Stress echocardiography with dobutamine infusion for detection of coronary artery disease is a potential alternative to exercise stress testing with some theoretic advantages. Fifty patients who were not receiving cardioactive medication were prospectively studied with two-dimensional echocardiography and 12-lead electrocardiography (ECG) during incremental dobutamine infusion (5, 10, 15 and 20 micrograms/kg body weight per min, each dose for 8 min). Images were analyzed by using an 11-segment left ventricular model. All patients underwent correlative exercise ECG and coronary angiography, which revealed normal coronary arteries in 14 and significant disease (greater than or equal to 70% diameter stenosis) in 36. Peak rate-pressure product during dobutamine infusion was 18,845 +/- 4,156 versus 23,740 +/- 6,158 mm Hg/min on exercise (p less than 0.01). Interobserver concordance for wall motion analysis was good (kappa coefficient = 0.77). The use of baseline (n = 14) or reversible (n = 24) regional asynergy to define an abnormal dobutamine echocardiogram resulted in a sensitivity for detecting coronary artery disease of 78% and a specificity of 93%. Corresponding data for the dobutamine ECG were 47% and 71% and for the exercise ECG were 72% and 71%, respectively. The development of new mitral regurgitation on Doppler color flow imaging (n = 4) improved sensitivity to 81% without loss of specificity. Inducible asynergy or new mitral regurgitation was observed in 6 (50%) of 12 patients with single-, 6 (60%) of 10 with double- and 12 (86%) of 14 with triple-vessel disease. The site of transient asynergy provided additional localizing information. Exercise duration and time to diagnostic ST segment shift were shorter in patients with coronary artery disease with versus those without echocardiographic evidence of ischemia (both p less than 0.05). Side effects during dobutamine infusion were mild and short-lived. Dobutamine stress echocardiography is well tolerated, is useful for detection and assessment of coronary artery disease and is applicable to patients unable to exercise.     

Advantages of exercise echocardiography in comparison to dobutamine echocardiography in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease in hypertensive subjects.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy and safety of two stress echocardiography methods, exercise and dobutamine, in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease in hypertensive patients with angina. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 197 treated hypertensive patients, age 53 +/- 9 years (65 women) with no history of myocardial infarction referred for coronary angiography were prospectively investigated with exercise electrocardiography (ECG), exercise and dobutamine echocardiography. RESULTS: Sensitivity of the exercise ECG, exercise echocardiography and dobutamine echocardiography did not differ (77%, 82% and 75%). Negative predictive value of exercise ECG was significantly lower than exercise echocardiography (64% vs 79%, P < 0.01). Specificity and positive predictive value of exercise ECG were markedly lower than exercise and dobutamine echocardiography (57%, 96%, 98% and 72%, 97%, 98%, P < 0.0001 for both stress echocardiography vs ECG). Specificity and sensitivity of diagnostic methods were not influenced by the presence of echocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy. Dobutamine infusion in comparison to exercise was more often associated with substantial arterial blood pressure rise or fall (7% vs 2%, P < 0.05) and with simple ventricular ectopy (15,7% vs 6,1%, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In hypertensive patients with the symptoms of angina, both stress echo methods are significantly more specific than the exercise ECG test. Maximal exercise is associated with less frequent side effects than infusion of dobutamine, so exercise echocardiography may be preferred in the diagnosis of angina in hypertensive patients.     

Comparison of exercise stress testing with dobutamine stress echocardiography and radionuclide ventriculography for diagnosis of coronary artery disease

Dobutamine stress echocardiography, Tc-99m radionuclide ventriculography (RNVG), and exercise stress testing were performed prospectively in 63 patients with suspected coronary artery disease to compare the values of exercise testing, dobutamine stress echocardiography and RNVG in the non-invasive diagnosis of coronary artery disease. The sensitivities of dobutamine stress echocardiography and RNVG were found to be higher than that of exercise testing (93-62%, p < 0.001; 83-62%, p < 0.05). The sensitivities of dobutamine stress echocardiography and RNVG were similar (p > 0.05). There were no differences between the sensitivities of the three techniques in multiple vessel disease (p > 0.05). The specificities of dobutamine stress echocardiography and RNVG were higher than that of exercise testing (for both of the tests 86-62%, p < 0.05). The diagnostic accuracy of dobutamine stress echocardiography and RNVG were similar (p > 0.05). The results of dobutamine stress echocardiography RNVG were concordant with each other in 46 patients (76%, kappa = 65%) in sectional analysis. Dobutamine stress echocardiography and RNVG tests were comparable with each other in 85% of the 189 segments (kappa = 64%). The expected 5% decrease at peak doses of dobutamine was not detected in stress echocardiography in 25 patients and in RNVG in 26 of the patients. Dobutamine stress echocardiography and RNVG are superior to exercise testing in the diagnosis of single vessel disease and there is no significant difference between the two techniques. When the ejection fraction is considered in dobutamine stress echocardiography and RNVG, it does not make an additional contribution to the diagnosis of coronary artery disease.     

Comparison between dobutamine echocardiography and thallium-201 scintigraphy in detecting residual stenosis,ischemia, and necrosis in patients with prior myocardial infarction

Background: Following the first attempts to detect myocardial ischemia with two-dimensional echocardiography stress testing, pharmacologic stress using dobutamine infusion has become an alternative to echocardiography exercise testing for evaluation of coronary artery disease. It has been shown that stress echocardiography has a diagnostic accuracy similar to that of an exercise thallium test. Other studies, however, indicated that radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging was more sensitive than exercise or pharmacologic stress echocardiography for detection of ischemia or jeopardized myocardium. Hypothesis: The aim of the present study was to determine the ability of dobutamine stress echocardiography in comparison with thallium-201 scintigraphy to identify multivessel disease and the presence of myocardial scar and ischemia in 60 consecutive patients who suffered a first myocardial infarction (MI). Methods: Patients were evaluated by coronary angiography and ventriculography, thallium-201 (²⁰¹Tl) tomographic scintigraphy, and dobutamine echocardiography within 3 months of a first MI. Forty-seven had Q-wave MI and 13 had non-Q-wave MI. Eleven patients were excluded from final analysis—7 because of failure to achieve target heart rate in spite of the use of atropine, and 4 because of high blood pressure following the infusion of dobutamine. Results: Dobutamine echocardiography showed an overall sensitivity of 43% for detection of coronary artery lesions of 50–74% diameter stenosis and ²⁰¹Tl scintigraphy showed a sensitivity of 71%. For detection of lesions of ≥75% diameter stenosis, dobutamine echocardiography showed a sensitivity of 52% and ²⁰¹Tl a sensitivity of 70%. Overall agreement between wall motion and myocardial perfusion for detection of necrosis and/or ischemia in the infarct area was 40.4% with a kappa coefficient of 0.09 (p = 0.13). For detection of ischemic myocardium outside the infarct zone, overall agreement was 78.6% with a kappa coefficient of 0.49 (p<0.0001). Conclusion: Dobutamine echocardiography results showed a lower sensitivity than myocardial perfusion images in predicting multivessel coronary artery disease, and there was poor agreement between both methods in identifying necrosis or ischemia.     

Enhanced sensitivity for detection of coronary artery disease by addition of atropine to dobutamine stress echocardiography.

Patients undergoing dobutamine stress echocardiography often take beta antagonists which limit heart rate response and sensitivity in the test for detection of coronary artery disease. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of the addition of atropine to dobutamine stress echocardiography on clinical, electrocardiographic and echocardiographic outcomes. Dobutamine stress echocardiography was performed starting at and increasing every 3 minutes with 10 micrograms/kg/min to a maximum of 40 micrograms/kg/min (stage 4), which was continued for 6 minutes. In patients not achieving 85% predicted maximal exercise heart rate and in whom the test was not judged positive on echocardiographic or electrocardiographic criteria, atropine (0.25 mg intravenously, repeated up to a maximum of 1 mg if necessary) was added and dobutamine continued for up to a further 5 minutes, or until an adequate heart rate was achieved or the test was stopped because of chest pain or electrocardiographic changes. Of 80 consecutive patients undergoing dobutamine stress echocardiography within 2 weeks of coronary angiography, 49 required atropine (group A) and 31 required only dobutamine (group B). After dobutamine alone, heart rate (mean +/- SD) was higher in group B than in group A: 129 +/- 20 vs 90 +/- 18 beats/min, p less than 0.0001; but after the addition of atropine, heart rate in group A increased to 120 +/- 20 beats/min. Overall sensitivity for the detection of coronary disease was 70%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 55 to 83%; after the addition of atropine, sensitivity for group A was 65%, 95% CI 45 to 81%; in group B, sensitivity was 81%, 95% CI 54 to 96%.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Early dobutamine echocardiography for the assessment of coronary stenosis after first Q-wave myocardial infarction

We assessed the accuracy of early dobutamine stress echocardiography to detect infarct-related coronary artery and multivessel disease in patients with first Q wave myocardial infarction after withdrawal of cardioactive drugs. Dobutamine-atropine echocardiography was performed in 91 consecutive patients (mean age 59+/-6 years) 7+/-4 days after myocardial infarction. Dobutamine was infused at incremental doses of 5, 10, 20, 30 to 40 microg/kg/min each one dose for 3 min. Peak heart rate was 134+/-17 bpm. All patients underwent coronary angiography before discharge. Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of ischemic and biphasic response to detect residual stenosis of infarct-related coronary artery were 70, 92 and 73%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of ischemic or biphasic response were similar in the vascular territories of left anterior descending (74, 86 and 75%, respectively), right (67, 100 and 70%, respectively) and circumflex coronary arteries (64, 100, and 69%, respectively). Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of heterozonal wall motion abnormalities for multivessel coronary artery disease were 64, 82 and 76%, respectively. Dobutamine stress echocardiography is sensitive and specific in detecting residual coronary stenosis and multivessel disease in patients with first Q-wave myocardial infarction. The test is safe even without pharmacological protection.     

Diagnosis of coronary artery disease in patients with permanent cardiac pacemaker by dobutamine stress echocardiography or exercise thallium-201 myocardial tomography

This study evaluated the use of dobutamine stress echocardiography and exercise thallium-201 myocardial computed tomography (CT) in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with permanent transvenous pacemaker with the electrode implanted in the right ventricle (RV). Twenty-nine consecutive patients with pacemaker underwent dobutamine stress echocardiography, exercise thallium-201 myocardial CT, and coronary arteriography over a period of 8 +/- 1 days. None of these patients had suffered a myocardial infarction (MI). The cardiac rhythm of every patient was electrically paced during echocardiography and tomography. Sixteen (55%) patients showed CAD on angiography (stenosis > or = 50% of the luminal diameter of a major epicardial vessel). The detection sensitivity for CAD was 94% for the tomography and 88% for the echocardiography (P = NS). The difference between the sensitivities of the two techniques in detecting CAD based on the affected coronary artery was not statistically significant. Of the 13 patients without CAD, tomography showed a positive result in nine cases, i.e., a specificity of 31%, whereas echocardiography showed a positive result in only one case, i.e., a specificity of 92% (P < 0. 01). Exercise thallium-201 myocardial computed tomography produces an increased rate of false-positive results in patients with permanent transvenous cardiac pacemaker (PCP) implanted in the right ventricle (RV). Dobutamine stress echocardiography can thus be used to reduce considerably the level of false-positive results in these patients and still retain a detection sensitivity for CAD equal to that of myocardial tomography.     

Dobutamine stress test to diagnose the presence and severity of coronary artery lesions in angina.

To calculate the accuracy of dobutamine infusion as a stress test to detect coronary lesions, 90 patients with angina and nine asymptomatic subjects with nonsignificant coronary lesions were submitted to a dobutamine test and coronary arteriography. Dobutamine was given in doses of 5, 10, 15 and 20 micrograms kg-1 min-1 every 5 min; a 12 lead ECG and blood pressure was monitored. Pressure x rate product increased from 8240 +/- 1667 to 14,898 +/- 3042. The test was negative (neither angina pain, nor ST segment shift) in 31 patients, and positive in 68. The ST segment was depressed in 33 cases and elevated in 20. Significant (greater than or equal to 50%) coronary lesions were seen in 63 patients and functional (coronary spasm or vasoconstriction) abnormalities in six. The sensitivity of the dobutamine test for the detection of coronary lesions was 95%, specificity 78%, predictive value of a positive test 88%, of a negative test 90% and diagnostic efficiency 89%. Strongly positive tests predicted severe lesions in 91% of the cases, and slightly positive tests ruled out severe lesions in 84%. ST segment elevation was induced in 20 cases and corresponded to a severe coronary lesion. In conclusion, the dobutamine stress test is a simple and accurate method of predicting coronary artery disease in patients with angina, distinguishing between severe and mild lesions. It can be a good alternative to an exercise test.     

Dobutamine stress echocardiography: initial experience of a Canadian centre.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the diagnostic accuracy, electrocardiogram and hemodynamic effects and safety of dobutamine stress echocardiography. SUBJECTS: Sixty-one patients with suspected coronary artery disease. All patients underwent coronary arteriography. MAIN RESULTS: The sensitivity of dobutamine stress echocardiography in diagnosis of coronary artery disease in the whole group was 91%. In patients with left anterior descending it was 97%; right 85%; circumflex 76%; three vessel 100%; two vessel 95%; single vessel 77%. Specificity, positive predictive value and accuracy of dobutamine stress echocardiography in diagnosis of coronary disease (whole group) was 57, 94 and 87%, respectively. ST depression of more than 1 mm occurred in 11 patients, ST elevation of more than 1 mm in three patients, T wave inversion in one and T normalization in nine. Significant differences of the effects of beta-blockers were noted on the peak effects of dobutamine as follows: heart rate increase of 46 +/- 22 versus 20 +/- 13 beats/min (P less than 0.0001); systolic pressure increase of 4 +/- 26 versus 22 +/- 19 mmHg (P less than 0.01); diastolic pressure decrease of 18 +/- 16 versus 10 +/- 12 mmHg (P less than 0.03) for patients without or with beta-blockers, respectively. Unifocal ventricular premature beats were noted in 10 patients, atrial premature beats in five and ventricular couplets in one. Angina occurred in 11 patients. Atypical chest pain occurred in seven patients, tingling in 11 and nausea in four. Thirty-six patients were totally asymptomatic. CONCLUSIONS: In this population with high prevalence (85%) of coronary artery disease, dobutamine stress echocardiography had high sensitivity and positive predictive value for coronary disease detection particularly in patients with left anterior descending or three vessel disease. The specificity and accuracy were not as good, but this may reflect the small number of normal patients. Dobutamine was well tolerated and conveniently administered.     

The echo-dobutamine test for the diagnosis of myocardial ischemia. Study on 20 patients with normal kinetics at rest

We have assessed the value of dobutamine stress echocardiography for the diagnosis of myocardial ischemia in 20 consecutive patients referred for chest pain, without a previous myocardial infarction and with a normal left ventricular wall motion at rest. The test was considered positive when wall motion abnormalities appeared during dobutamine infusion (from 5 to a maximum of 40 micrograms/Kg/min). The results were compared to the % diameter stenosis (%DS) quantitatively measured on coronary arteriography. "Significant" coronary artery disease was defined as greater than or equal to 50% DS. No significant side effects occurred in any patients during the test. Transient wall motion abnormalities were detected in 8 of the 12 patients with significant coronary artery disease (sensitivity = 66%) and in 1 of the 8 patients without significant coronary artery disease (specificity = 88%). All the patients with false-negative dobutamine stress echocardiography had distal stenosis or stenosis in a collateral vessel; moreover, all the patients with true-positive dobutamine stress echocardiography had proximal (7 patients) or middle (1 patient) stenosis. The results of this study show that dobutamine stress echocardiography is a safe and feasible test for the noninvasive diagnosis of myocardial ischemia.     

Examination of the usefulness of echocardiography with dobutamine for diagnosis of coronary disease]

To assess the feasibility, safety and usefulness of dobutamine stress echocardiography for the detection of coronary artery disease we evaluated 63 patients (45 men, 18 women) with effort chest pain. All patients underwent electrocardiographic submaximal bicycle exercise testing and 2-dimensional echocardiography during dobutamine infusion. Echocardiographic dobutamine test response was considered positive when new wall motion abnormalities were observed during dobutamine infusion. Sensitivity and specificity of electrocardiographic exercise test and dobutamine stress echocardiography were assessed in 25 patients who underwent selective coronary angiography. The sensitivity and specificity of dobutamine stress echocardiography, respectively 93.3% and 83.3%, were higher than those of exercise electrocardiography. 2-dimensional echocardiography during dobutamine infusion is a well tolerated, feasible and effective test for detecting coronary artery disease.     

Dobutamine stress echocardiography compared with dipyridamole thallium-201 single-photon emission computed tomography in detecting coronary artery disease

To compare the diagnostic value of dobutamine stress echocardiographywith dipyridamole thallium-201 single-photon emission computedtomography (SPECT) in detecting coronary artery disease (CAD),we performed both tests on 54 patients who also underwent coronaryarteriography. Dobutamine was infused at an incremental regimenof 5,10,20,30 and 40 µg. kg^-1. min^-1. Dipyridamole wasinfused at a rate of 0.14 mg. kg^-1. min^-1 over 4 min. Dobutaminestress echocardiography detected 40 (93%) and SPECT 42 (98%,P=ns) of the 43 patients with significant CAD, defined as (greaterthan or equal) 50% diameter stenosis. The specificity was 73%(8 of 11) for both tests. The sensitivity for detecting individualcoronary artery stenosis with dobutamine stress echocardiographywas 81% (30 of 37) for the left anterior descending artery,75% (24 of 32) for the right coronary artery, and 61% (17 of28) for the left circumflex artery. For SPECT it was 89%, 97%(P>0.05 vs dobutamine stress echocardiography) and 75%, respectively. Among the 97 stenotic coronary arteries, 17 had mild to moderatestenosis (50%-69% diameter stenosis) and 80 had severe stenosis($$70% diameter stenosis). With dobutamine stress echocardiography,53% of the arteries with mild to moderate stenosis were identifiedvs 78% of those with severe stenosis (P<0.05). With SPECT,the sensitivity was 82% (14 of 17) in mild to moderate stenosisand 89% (71 of 80) in severe stenosis (P=ns). No major sideeffects occurred during either test. Thus, both dobutamine stressand SPECT are highly sensitive for detection and localizationof CAD. However, the sensitivity of dobutamine stress is affectedby the level of stenosis severity.     

Dobutamine stress echocardiography in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease in women with chest pain: comparison with different noninvasive tests

BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of coronary artery disease(CAD) in women remains elusive. The classical diagnostic armamentarium has been found to be very limited. Dobutamine stress echocardiography has emerged as a powerful test in assessing CAD in the general population, but most studies failed to include women. HYPOTHESIS: The accuracy of dobutamine stress echocardiography in the diagnosis of CAD in women with chest pain is high and superior to dipyridamole echocardiography, exercise electrocardiography, and sestamibi single-photon emission tomography (MIBI-SPECT) scintigraphy. METHODS: We studied 99 consecutive women with chest pain and no previous history of CAD who underwent dobutamine echocardiography and coronary angiography. We also compared these results with those of dipyridamole echocardiography in 63 patients. exercise stress testing in 83 (48 conclusive), and MIBI-SPECT scintigraphy during dobutamine infusion in 54. RESULTS: Significant CAD was found in 42 women. Sensitivity and specificity of dobutamine stress echocardiography were 69 and 89%, respectively. Dipyridamole echocardiography showed similar accuracy (sensitivity 72% and specificity 94%). Finally, sensitivity of exercise test and MIBI-SPECT was similar (76 and 88%, respectively) and specificity was lower (53 and 57%, respectively). After excluding patients known to have a high incidence of false positive results, MIBI-SPECT specificity rose up to 80%. CONCLUSION: Dobutamine stress echocardiography and dipyridamole echocardiography bear a high diagnostic accuracy in women with chest pain. MIBI-SPECT is also a useful tool after excluding subgroups with a high incidence of false positive results.     

Angiographic documented coronary arterial spasm in absence of critical coronary artery stenoses in a patient with variant angina episodes during exercise and dobutamine stress echocardiography

Dobutamine stress echocardiography is widely performed as a useful diagnostic tool in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. Dobutamine induced myocardial ischaemia is frequently associated with ST segment depression. ST segment elevation is uncommon and is almost always associated with prior myocardial infarction or transient total coronary occlusion. Dobutamine induced ST segment elevation in absence of significant coronary artery disease is a rare condition and is supposed to be a consequence of severe coronary artery spasm. The case of a 58 year old man with variant angina episodes at rest, during exercise test, and dobutamine stress echocardiography is reported, in whom coronary spasm without significant coronary artery stenoses was documented angiographically.


Keywords: coronary spasm; variant angina; Prinzmetal angina; dobutamine stress echocardiography; exercise test     

Impact of Beta Blockers on Dobutamine-Atropine Stress Echocardiography

Dobutamine increases oxygen demand in the myocardium and is used in conjunction with echocardiography to detect coronary artery disease. Beta blockers (BB) are partial antagonists of dobutamine and, therefore, offset dobutamine effects. Still, the impact of BB therapy on dobutamine stress echocardiography is not clear. One hundred forty-one dobutamine-atropine echocardiographic studies have retrospectively been analyzed: 27 patients were on BB (19%; group I); and 114 off BB (81%; group II). Coronary angiography was performed in a similar percentage of patients (97% and 85%, respectively; P = NS). No differences in clinical and angiographic profile were found between the groups. Sensitivity (83% vs 71%; P = NS) and specificity (100% vs 95%; P = NS) for coronary artery disease were similar in both groups. Atropine was infused more frequently to patients from group I (67% vs 46%; P = 0.04). Limiting side effects and prolonged ischemia presented with the same frequency in both groups. When the dobutamine test was positive, severe extent of ischemia appeared more often in patients from group I than in patients from group II (66% vs 33%; P = 0.03). The majority of patients from group I (55%) with severe extent of ischemia and only 12% from group II received atropine (P = 0.02). No differences were found in dobutamine time and extent of ischemia in patients from group I who had a positive response to dobutamine. On the contrary, patients from group II with one vessel disease had a dobutamine time longer (10.5 +/- 3.8 vs 7.8 +/- 3.7 min; P < 0.05) and extent of ischemia smaller (1.8 +/- 0.4 vs 2.6 +/- 0.5 segments; P < 0.05) than patients from group II with multivessel disease. We conclude that: 1) sensitivity of dobutamine-atropine echocardiography for diagnosis of coronary artery disease remains even if patients are on BB; 2) patients with significant coronary artery disease who are taking BB often develop severe myocardial ischemia during dobutamine-atropine stress echocardiography; and 3) BB therapy precludes stratification of a positive echocardiographic response. These conclusions should be confirmed in a prospective study to be considered as definitive. (ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, Volume 13, July 1996)     

盐酸去甲乌药碱与多巴酚丁胺药物负荷试验心肌灌注显像的对比实验研究

目的探讨盐酸去甲乌药碱作为心脏负荷试验药物在放射性核素心肌灌注显像检测冠状动脉病变中的价值。方法13只中华小型猪,于冠状动脉左前降支近中段放置Ameroid动脉环,造成慢性冠状动脉狭窄模型,3周后,分别进行盐酸去甲乌药碱和多巴酚丁胺药物负荷试验,静态心肌SPECT显像。结果应用盐酸去甲乌药碱和多巴酚丁胺负荷试验放射性核素心肌显像,检测冠心病的敏感性均为92%,而盐酸去甲乌药碱和多巴酚丁胺负荷显像之间图像评分(9.9±8.5和9.4±8.6,P=NS)和定量分析(0.68±0.12和0.68±0.15,P=NS)均没有差别,两者的图像评分有很高的一致性(kappa=0.849,P<0.0001)。结论本研究表明,与多巴酚丁胺相似,盐酸去甲乌药碱可用于药物负荷试验心肌灌注显像检测冠状动脉狭窄和心肌缺血。     

Detection and clinical usefulness of a biphasic response during exercise echocardiography early after myocardial infarction

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the accuracy of exercise echocardiography (EE) for detecting infarct-related artery (IRA) stenosis and predicting functional recovery early after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). BACKGROUND: Dobutamine stress echocardiography is widely used for identifying jeopardized myocardium. The clinical usefulness of a biphasic response detected during EE has never been investigated. METHODS: A total of 114 consecutive patients with a first AMI and > or = 2 dyssynergic segments in the infarct-related territory underwent semi-supine continuous EE 6 +/- 2 days after AMI. Quantitative coronary angiography was performed in all patients after EE. A follow-up echocardiogram was obtained one month later. RESULTS: Ninety-seven patients had significant (> or = 50%) IRA stenosis, and 26 had multivessel disease. Residual ischemia was identified in 77 patients (biphasic response in 62 and worsening response in 15). The sensitivity and specificity of ischemia during EE for predicting IRA stenosis were 75% and 76%, respectively. The sensitivity of a biphasic response was higher than the sensitivity of a worsening response (61% vs. 14%, p < 0.0001). Wall motion abnormalities induced in other vascular territories were specific (97%) and moderately sensitive (62%) for the detection of multivessel disease. Functional recovery was observed in 75 patients. Two independent variables predicted contractile recovery: contractile reserve during EE (p < 0.0001) and elective angioplasty of the IRA (p = 0.002). A biphasic response, but not sustained improvement, predicted reversible dysfunction (73% vs. 9%, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: A biphasic response can be detected during exercise. Exercise echocardiography is an accurate tool for detecting IRA stenosis and predicting functional improvement early after AMI.     

Left ventricular volume analysis for the detection of coronary artery disease during dobutamine stress echocardiography in patients undergoing vascular surgery.

AIMS: The purpose of the study was to prospectively evaluate the effectiveness of left ventricular volume changes analysis as compared to wall motion assessment for detecting coronary artery disease during dobutamine stress echocardiography in patients undergoing elective vascular surgery. METHODS AND RESULTS: Left ventricular volumes, measured by using the ellipsoid biplane method combining the apical four- and two-chamber echocardiographic views, and classical wall motion score were determined at rest and peak stress (dobutamine infusion 5-40 microg/kg/min+/- atropine 0.25-1mg) in 68 consecutive patients. A positive test was defined as a decrease of less than 15% in left ventricular end-diastolic or end-systolic volume at peak stress for volume analysis and as an increase in score between rest and peak stress in one or more segments for wall motion assessment. Stress test was not analysable in five patients. Coronary angiography revealed significant coronary artery disease (coronary stenosis >or=70%) in 28/63 (44%) patients: one-vessel in 15, two- or three-vessel disease in 13. Overall sensitivity and specificity for coronary artery disease detection were 56% and 97% with left ventricular volume analysis, as compared to 64% and 89% with wall motion assessment. For patients with two- or three-vessel disease, sensitivity and specificity of volume analysis reached 92%. CONCLUSION: The present data suggest that left ventricular volume change analysis during dobutamine stress echocardiography could be a reliable method for the detection of extensive coronary artery disease for patients undergoing vascular surgery.     

Prevalence and relevance of a septal diastolic notch during dobutamine stress echocardiography

Background Dobutamine stress echocardiography has become an accepted simpleand inexpensive method of detecting coronary artery disease.In this pharmacological stress test, particular attention hasbeen paid to transient systolic wall motion abnormalities. Ourgroup has noted an abnormal diastolic ventricular septal motion,a ‘diastolic notch’, during dobutamine stress echocardiographythat has not been previously described. Methods and Results To find out whether this anomalous septal motion is relatedto coronary artery disease we have analysed the stress studiesof 125 patients (69 men, age 61±9 years) with chest pain,no previous myocardial infarction and no left bundle branchblock, who underwent a dobutamine stress test. Dobutamine wasinfused up to 40µ.kg.^–1min^–1in 3min stages.A positive stress test was defined as the appearance of transientasynergy. Dobutamine time was the time from the infusion ofdobutamine to the appearance of transient asynergy. The diastolicnotch time was the time at which diastolic notch was first detected.Diastolic notch was detected in 21 patients with single coronaryartery disease, 19 of whom had a severe left anterior descendingartery stenosis. Diastolic notch was present in 19 out of 27patients (70%) with single left anterior descending stenosis.Twenty-six out of 44 patients with multivessel coronary arterydisease had evidence of a diastolic notch and 20 of these 26had severe stenosis of the left anterior descending artery.Finally, all three patients with left main coronary artery diseasehad a diastolic notch while no patient with angiographicallynormal coronary arteries had this sign. In patients with a diastolicnotch and a positive dobutamine stress test, diastolic notchtime was shorter than dobutamine time (9±4min vs 11±3min,P<0·05). Conclusions In patients without previous myocardial infarction and withoutleft bundle branch block (1) the appearance of a septal diastolicnotch during dobutamine stress echocardiography is very specificfor the presence of coronary artery disease; (2) the detectionof diastolic notch is mostly related to the existence of severeleft anterior descending artery stenosis; (3) diastolic notchprecedes the development of ventricular asynergy.     

Evaluation of a new stress echocardiography technique combining exercise and dobutamine in the detection of coronary disease

Dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) and exercise stress echocardiography (ESE) are widely used for diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Each of these methods has limitations: secondary effects of Dobutamine, poor imaging quality, difficulty in attaining the maximal heart rate. The authors evaluated a test associating pedalling exercise at a constant low load (30-60 watts) with Dobutamine infusion (10-20-30-40 j/Kg/min +/- Atropine) (DES + E) in 42 patients referred for suspected coronary artery disease. All patients underwent coronary angiography on Day 1. There was significant coronary disease (> 50% stenosis) in 19 of the 42 patients. Sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, positive predictive value and overall diagnosis value were respectively 84, 87, 84, 87 and 86%. In the first 20 patients, the DES + E was compared directly with DES: There was only one undesirable side effect (hypertension) with DES + E compared with 5 with DES alone. The target heart rate was attained with lower doses of Dobutamine with DES + E (32.35 vs 39.42 j/Kg/min, p = 0.05). DES + E therefore seems to be a promising technique which is better tolerated than DES alone with very satisfactory diagnostic performances. However, these results require further confirmation in larger numbers of patients.