Effect of reduced dose of triptorelin at the start of ovarian stimulation on the outcome of IVF: a randomized study.

BACKGROUND: Partial pituitary desensitization using gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists may be sufficient in women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for assisted reproduction. However, the minimal effective agonist dose remains to be determined. The aim of the study was to investigate the effect of a reduced daily dose of triptorelin, administered at the start of ovarian stimulation, on the results of IVF and intracytoplasmic sperm injection. METHODS: A total of 132 patients was randomized in two groups. Pituitary desensitization was obtained in group 1 (66 patients) with a single 3.75 mg injection (i.m.) of triptorelin. In group 2, 66 patients received 100 microg triptorelin daily, which was then reduced to 50 microg at the start of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) stimulation. RESULTS: No significant differences were found in terms of pregnancy rate per transfer (38% in group 1 versus 34.9% in group 2), implantation rate (20.2 versus 18%) and abortion rate (8.3 versus 9.1%). The number of FSH ampoules used, as well as the number of days stimulation required, was significantly reduced in group 2 (41 +/- 26 versus 46.6 +/- 25.3, P < 0.03 and 11 +/- 1.3 versus 11.8 +/- 1.5, P < 0.002 respectively). No significant differences were seen in oestradiol concentrations and in follicle number, in the quantity of oocytes collected and fertilized, or in the number of embryos obtained or transferred. CONCLUSION: A reduced dose of triptorelin is enough for pituitary suppression during ovarian stimulation but provides no significant improvement in IVF cycle outcome when compared with depot formulation. The possibility of a shorter treatment protocol requiring lower amounts of gonadotrophins should be considered in view of its economic advantage.     

长效曲普瑞林不同剂量在体外受精-胚胎移植中的治疗效果比较

目的探讨1/4支与1/2支长效曲普瑞林在体外受精-胚胎移植中的治疗效果。方法 290个长方案周期,根据基础窦卵泡数分为A组(15个)和B组(≥15个),两组内比较1/4支与1/2支长效曲普瑞林的治疗效果。结果促性腺激素(Gn)使用天数,两剂量无差异;Gn用量为1/4支组少于1/2支组,在A组有统计学意义(P0.05);hCG注射日血清LH水平为1/4支组高于1/2支组,无统计学意义,均无早发LH峰;hCG注射日血清E2为1/4支组显著高于1/2支组(P0.001),hCG注射日血清P水平为1/4支组高于1/2支组,胚胎种植率为1/4支组低于1/2支组,均在A组有统计学意义(P0.05);卵巢过度刺激综合症发生率为1/4支组高于1/2支组,在B组有统计学意义(P0.001);获卵数、正常受精数、优质胚胎数、妊娠率及流产率两剂量均无统计学意义。结论 1/4支和1/2支曲普瑞林均能达到可控制性超促排卵的降调效果;1/4支曲普瑞林在基础窦卵泡较少(15个)时能减少Gn用量;1/2支曲普瑞林在基础窦卵泡较多时(≥15个)能充分降调节,并能避免血清E2过高,减少卵巢过度刺激的风险,因此降调节时减少GnRHa的用量应当个体化。     

Dose-finding study for the use of long-acting gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogues prior to ovarian stimulation for IVF

Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogues improve the outcome of treatment with IVF by increasing the number and quality of oocytes retrieved and by reducing cycle cancellation rates. Whilst short-acting GnRH analogues are most commonly used, depot preparations are now available that are more convenient for patient use. Some studies have reported that pregnancy rates with depot GnRH analogues are similar to those of short-acting preparations, but others have suggested that the more profound down-regulation seen with depot GnRH analogues results in inferior embryo quality. The purpose of this study was to determine whether a lower than conventional dose of a depot GnRH analogue may be more appropriate for use in ovarian stimulation prior to IVF. Sixty patients were randomized to receive either 3.75 mg (conventional dose) or 1.87 mg (low dose) triptorelin prior to ovarian stimulation for IVF. Suppression was measured using serum concentrations of LH measured 2 and 3 weeks after the administration of the GnRH analogues, the dose of gonadotrophin used and the time to resumption of menses. Mean concentrations of LH were 2.2 +/- 1.0 and 1.1 +/- 0.6 IU/l in the conventional dose group and 3.5 +/- 5.5 and 2.7 +/- 1.9 IU/l in the low dose group (P < 0.05 at 2 and 3 weeks). There were no significant differences between the doses of gonadotrophins used, the number of oocytes and embryos available and the time to resumption of menses, nor in the pregnancy rates. Although the degree of suppression as measured biochemically was more profound with the conventional dose, this did not affect the IVF outcome. The use of a lower dose therefore appears to be equally effective and could contribute to a reduction in the cost of treatment.     

Clinical outcome with half-dose depot triptorelin is the same as reduced-dose daily buserelin in a long protocol of controlled ovarian stimulation for ICSI/embryo transfer: a randomized double-blind clinical trial (NCT00461916)

BACKGROUND: Traditional doses of depot GnRH agonist may be excessive for ovarian stimulation. We compared half-dose depot triptorelin (Group I) with reduced-dose daily buserelin (Group II) in a long protocol ICSI/embryo transfer through a double-blind randomized clinical trial. METHODS: Controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) was started by a pretreatment with oral contraceptives for 21 days. Then, 182 patients were randomized into two groups of 91. Group I received 1.87 mg triptorelin depot i.m. followed by daily s.c. injections of saline. Group II (reduced-dose protocol) received a bolus injection of i.m. saline followed by daily s.c. injections of 0.5 mg buserelin, which was then reduced to 0.25 mg at the start of human menopausal gonadotrophin stimulation. When transvaginal ultrasound showed at least two follicles of 16-20 mm diameter, HCG was given and ICSI was performed 40-42 h later. RESULTS: No significant differences were seen in the mean (SD) number of follicles at HCG administration, as our primary outcome [10.3 (4.4) in Group I versus 11.1 (4.2) in Group II, P = 0.180, mean difference = 0.86, 95% confidence interval 0.39-2.11]. The other early results of COS, clinical and ongoing pregnancy rates, or early pregnancy loss were also not significantly different between the groups. Group I endured longer stimulation period [11.2 (1.8) days versus 10.6 (1.9), P = 0.030]. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical outcomes were not significantly different between Group I and Group II.     

Low-dose aspirin does not improve ovarian responsiveness or pregnancy rate in IVF and ICSI patients: a randomized, placebo-controlled double-blind study

BACKGROUND: Poor ovarian and endometrial responses to gonadotrophin stimulation in assisted reproduction techniques lead to decreased pregnancy rates. The aim of the present study was to test the hypothesis that low-dose aspirin started prior to controlled ovarian stimulation improves ovarian responsiveness, pregnancy rate (PR) and pregnancy outcome. METHODS: A total of 374 women who were to undergo IVF/ICSI were randomized to receive 100 mg of aspirin (n=186) or placebo (n=188) daily. Treatment was started on the first day of controlled ovarian stimulation. It was continued until menstruation or a negative pregnancy test. Pregnant women continued the medication until delivery. The main outcome measures were the number of oocytes, number and quality of embryos, the clinical PR and pregnancy outcome. RESULTS: The mean (+/-SD) number of oocytes (12.0+/-7.0 versus 12.7+/-7.2), the total mean number of embryos (5.82+/-4.35 versus 5.99+/-4.66), the mean number of top quality embryos (0.99+/-1.39 versus 1.18+/-1.51) and the number of embryos transferred (1.64+/-0.64 versus 1.63+/-0.71) did not differ in the aspirin and placebo groups. Between the aspirin and placebo group, there was no statistically significant difference in clinical PR per embryo transfer (25.3%, n=44 out of 174 versus 27.4%, n=48 out of 175) or clinical PR per cycle initiated (23.7% versus 25.5%). Birth rate per embryo transfer did not differ significantly between the aspirin (18.4%) and placebo (21.1%) groups. The incidence of poor responders [12 (6.5%) versus 13 (6.9%)] was similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: The present results indicate that low-dose aspirin treatment does not have any beneficial effect on ovarian responsiveness, PR and pregnancy outcome in unselected women undergoing IVF/ICSI.     

GnRH agonist versus GnRH antagonist in oocyte donation cycles: a prospective randomized study

BACKGROUND: The specific role of LH in folliculogenesis and oocyte maturation is unclear. GnRH antagonists, when administered in the late follicular phase, induce a sharp decrease in serum LH which may be detrimental for IVF outcome. This study was performed to evaluate whether the replacement of GnRH agonist (triptorelin) by a GnRH antagonist (ganirelix; NV Organon) in oocyte donation cycles has any impact on pregnancy and implantation rates. METHODS: A total of 148 donor IVF cycles was randomly assigned to use either a GnRH antagonist daily administered from the 8th day of stimulation (group I) or a GnRH agonist long protocol (group II) for the ovarian stimulation of their donors. The primary endpoints were the pregnancy and the implantation rates. RESULTS: The clinical pregnancy rate per transfer (39.72%, 29/73 versus 41.33%, 31/75) based on transvaginal scan findings at 7 weeks of gestation, the implantation rate (23.9 versus 25.4%) and the first trimester abortion rate (10.34 versus 12.90%) were similar in the two groups. CONCLUSION: In oocyte donation cycles the replacement of GnRH agonist by a GnRH antagonist appears to have no impact on the pregnancy and implantation rates when its administration starts on day 8 of stimulation.     

Ovarian cyst formation following GnRH agonist administration in IVF cycles: incidence and impact

BACKGROUND: The formation of functional ovarian cysts has been recognized as one of the side effects of GnRH agonist administration. The formation of cysts during IVF treatment may be of no clinical significance or may negatively influence its outcome. The objective of this study was to determine the incidence of ovarian cyst formation following GnRH agonist administration and to examine their effect on IVF outcome. METHODS: A prospective study of 1317 IVF patients who developed one or more functional ovarian cysts of >or=15 mm following GnRH agonist treatment was performed. Transvaginal ultrasonographic-guided cyst aspiration was carried out in 76 randomly allocated patients out of 122 patients who were found to have functional ovarian cysts before starting ovarian stimulation with gonadotropins. RESULTS: The incidence of follicular cyst formation was 9.3%. Cyst cycles in comparison with non-cyst cycles had significantly elevated day 3 basal FSH (mean+/-SD of 8.3+/-3.2 versus 5.3+/-2.6 mIU/ml, P<0.05) and required more ampoules of gonadotropins (46.3+/-16.5 versus 35+/-14.6, P<0.01). Furthermore, they showed a statistically significant decrease in the quality and number of oocytes retrieved, fertilization rate, number and quality of embryos, implantation and pregnancy rates, with a significant increase in cancellation and abortion rates. Patients with bilateral cysts had a significantly lower number of oocytes and embryos retrieved, with a lower proportion of metaphase II oocytes. They also had a higher proportion of poor quality embryos. Cyst aspiration was not associated with a significant difference in the above parameters. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of cyst formation during GnRH agonist treatment is lower than previously reported. In such cases, the quality of oocytes and embryos were significantly compromised, with a significant increase in the cycle cancellation rate and a decrease in the implantation and pregnancy rates. Neither conservative management nor cyst aspiration improved the IVF outcome.     

Recombinant human LH supplementation during GnRH antagonist administration in IVF/ICSI cycles: a prospective randomized study

BACKGROUND: When administered in the late follicular phase to prevent an LH surge, GnRH antagonists induce a sharp decrease in serum LH levels that may be detrimental for assisted reproductive technology cycle outcome. Therefore, a prospective study was designed to assess the effects of recombinant human (r)LH supplementation during GnRH antagonist (cetrorelix) administration. METHODS: The protocol consisted of cycle programming with oral contraceptive pill, ovarian stimulation with rFSH and flexible administration of a single dose of cetrorelix (3 mg). A total of 218 patients from three IVF centres were randomized (by sealed envelopes or according to woman's birth date) to receive (n = 114) or not (n = 104) a daily injection of rLH 75 IU from GnRH antagonist initiation to hCG injection. RESULTS: The only significant difference was a higher serum peak E2 level in patients treated with rLH (1476 +/- 787 versus 1012 +/- 659 pg/ml, P < 0.001) whereas the numbers of oocytes and embryos as well as the delivery rate (25.2 versus 24%) and the implantation rate per embryo (19.1 versus 17.4%) were similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: These results show that in an unselected group of patients, there is no evident benefit to supplement GnRH antagonist-treated cycles with rLH.     

Dose-finding study of triptorelin acetate for prevention of a premature LH surge in IVF: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRHa) are routinely used in IVF programmes to prevent an unwanted LH surge and consequent ovulation. Despite its widespread use in IVF, a convincing dose recommendation for GnRHa in IVF does not exist. In our opinion, the lowest possible dose of GnRHa should be used. Thus, we performed a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to determine the minimal daily dose of triptorelin acetate needed to suppress a premature LH surge during IVF treatment in a long protocol. A total of 240 women (60 in each group) was randomized to either placebo or to one of three doses of triptorelin, i.e. 15, 50 or 100 microg daily. Ovarian stimulation was performed with two or three ampoules of FSH daily. A premature LH surge occurred in 23% of placebo-treated patients, but in none of the triptorelin acetate-treated patients. There were significantly more oocytes and embryos in the 50 and 100 microg triptorelin groups. There was no dose relationship in rates of either implantation, pregnancy, ongoing pregnancy, live birth or baby take-home. In this study we showed that daily administration of 15 microg triptorelin is sufficient to prevent a premature LH surge, and that 50 microg is equivalent to 100 microg in terms of IVF results.     

LH serum levels during ovarian stimulation as predictors of ovarian response and assisted reproduction outcome in down-regulated women stimulated with recombinant FSH

BACKGROUND: There has been much debate about the effect of 'residual' LH levels in normogonadotrophic women undergoing assisted reproduction with GnRH agonist down-regulation and recombinant FSH ovarian stimulation. The aim of this prospective study, where receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used, was to assess further the usefulness of serum LH levels as predictors of ovarian response, assisted reproduction treatment outcome, and the outcome of pregnancy when measured throughout the ovarian stimulation period in a large cohort of such assisted reproduction treatment women. METHODS: A total of 246 consecutive women undergoing their first cycle of IVF or ICSI treatment were included in this study. Blood samples for hormone analyses were obtained on day S0 (the day when pituitary suppression was evidenced) and every other day from stimulation day 5 (S5) until the day of hCG injection. RESULTS: LH serum levels throughout ovarian stimulation treatment were similar for cancelled (n =32) versus non-cancelled (n = 214) cycles, non-conception (n = 132) versus conception (n = 82) cycles, and ongoing pregnancy (n = 66) versus early pregnancy loss (n = 16) groups. There was no correlation between LH serum levels in non-cancelled cycles and parameters of ovarian response and assisted reproduction treatment outcome. ROC analysis showed that serum LH concentration during ovarian stimulation was unable to discriminate between cancelled and non-cancelled cycles, conception versus non-conception cycles, or early pregnancy loss versus ongoing pregnancy groups. CONCLUSIONS: Serum LH measurements during ovarian stimulation with recombinant FSH under pituitary suppression in normogonadotrophic women undergoing assisted reproduction treatment cannot predict ovarian response, IVF/ICSI outcome, implantation, and the outcome of pregnancy. Thus, there is little underlying physiological support for the addition of LH in stimulation protocols if daily doses of an appropriate GnRH agonist (leuprolide or triptorelin having lower potency than buserelin) and a step-down regimen of recombinant FSH administration are used.     

Does laparoscopic ovarian diathermy affect the outcome of IVF-embryo transfer in women with polycystic ovarian syndrome? A retrospective comparative study

Controlled ovarian stimulation for IVF and embryo transfer and outcome parameters were compared retrospectively in 31 women with clomiphene-resistant polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS). Of these women, 15 had previously undergone laparoscopic ovarian diathermy before IVF (group A, total 22 cycles) and 16 had not had surgical treatment (group B, total 24 cycles). No statistically significant differences were observed in the number of oocytes retrieved, although the number of embryos available for transfer was significantly higher in group B (7.1 +/- 3.8 versus 4.6 +/- 2.7, P < 0.01). The clinical pregnancy rate per embryo transfer appeared to be higher in group B (63.2 versus 41.2%), as did the miscarriage rate (66.7 versus 28.6%), giving an apparent improved ongoing pregnancy rate per embryo transfer in group A (29.4 versus 10.5%), but this was not statistically significantly different. The incidence of severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) was apparently higher in group B (4.2 versus 0%), but this difference was not statistically significant. No cases of severe OHSS were seen in group A. Ovarian diathermy does not appear to have a deleterious effect on controlled ovarian stimulation, and the outcome of IVF-embryo transfer may be beneficial in decreasing the risk of severe OHSS and improving the ongoing clinical pregnancy rate.     

Comparison between a GnRH antagonist and a GnRH agonist flare-up protocol in oocyte donors: a randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND: Little information is available on the outcome of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) using GnRH antagonist in oocyte donation cycles especially in comparison with the short GnRH agonist protocol. This study was aimed at comparing the two stimulation protocols in oocyte donation (OD) cycles. METHODS: A total of 113 donors randomly received COH using either GnRH antagonist or GnRH agonist. The primary endpoint was the mean number of mature oocytes retrieved per started donor cycle. Secondary endpoints were the mean number of cumulus-oocyte-complexes (COCs) retrieved, the mean proportion of mature oocytes, pregnancy and implantation rates in recipients. RESULTS: Oocytes were distributed to 166 recipients. The mean number (+/- SD) of COC (11.6 +/- 5.8 versus 12.1 +/- 6.7), mature oocytes (8.4 +/- 4.4 versus 8.9 +/- 5.3) and the proportion of mature oocytes (70.8 versus 75.7%) retrieved per started donor cycle were similar in the antagonist and agonist groups, respectively. The implantation rate (26.1 versus 30.1%), clinical (40.2 versus 45.6%) and ongoing pregnancy rate per recipient cycle (32.2 versus 37.9%) were comparable in antagonist and agonist protocols, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Similar mean number of mature oocytes and comparable pregnancy rates are achieved after OD in which donors received COH using GnRH antagonist or short GnRH agonist protocols.     

Comparable clinical outcome using the GnRH antagonist ganirelix or a long protocol of the GnRH agonist triptorelin for the prevention of premature LH surges in women undergoing ovarian stimulation

This multicentre, randomized study was performed to assess theefficacy and safety of 0.25 mg ganirelix (Orgalutran^®, Antagon^TM)treatment, using triptorelin (Decapeptyl^®) in a long protocolas a reference treatment. In total, 236 subjects were randomizedto treatment with ganirelix (0.25 mg, s.c.) and 119 to triptorelin(0.1 mg, s.c.) treatment (treatment ratio 2:1). Treatment withganirelix started on day 6 of stimulation, whereas treatmentwith triptorelin started on menstrual cycle day 21 to 24 ofthe previous cycle (i.e. the midluteal phase). The ganirelixregimen was on average 17 days shorter (9 versus 26 days) comparedto the triptorelin regimen. The median total dose of recombinantFSH (Puregon^®) used was 450 IU less (1350 versus 1800 IU)in the ganirelix protocol. The initial follicular growth wasfaster and, consequently, oestradiol concentrations were higherin the ganirelix group. On the day of human chorionic gonadotrophin(HCG), the mean number of follicles 11 mm was 10.1 and 10.7and the median serum oestradiol concentration was 1090 and 1370pg/ml in the ganirelix and triptorelin groups respectively.Per attempt, 7.9 and 9.6 oocytes (mean) were retrieved in theganirelix and triptorelin groups respectively. The fertilizationrates (64.0% ganirelix and 64.9% triptorelin) and the mean numberof good quality embryos (2.7 and 2.9) were comparable in bothtreatment groups. The implantation rate was identical (22.9%).The ongoing pregnancy rate per attempt was 31.0 and 33.9% inthe ganirelix and triptorelin groups respectively. The ganirelixregimen showed an improved local tolerance in that the percentageof subjects with at least one local skin reaction was 2-foldlower than in the triptorelin group (11.9 versus 24.1%). Takingall data together, it may be concluded that ganirelix offersa new treatment regimen in ovarian stimulation that is short,safe and well-tolerated, optimizing convenience for the patient.     

Effects of exogenous LH administration during ovarian stimulation of pituitary down-regulated young oocyte donors on oocyte yield and developmental competence

BACKGROUND: The role of exogenous LH supplementation in ovarian stimulation is a matter of debate. Here we evaluate the impact of exogenous LH on oocyte yield and developmental competence in an oocyte donation programme. METHODS: Oocyte donors were randomized (computer-generated randomization list) to groups stimulated with FSH alone or with a combination of FSH and LH after pituitary down-regulation with a GnRH agonist administered in the mid-luteal phase. RESULTS: In donors with deep suppression of pituitary LH (<1 IU/l) before the beginning of ovarian stimulation, the inclusion of exogenous LH resulted in an increase in the number of mature oocytes and good-quality zygotes and embryos as well as higher implantation rates when compared with stimulation with FSH alone. In contrast, the inclusion of exogenous LH in the stimulation of donors with pre-stimulation serum LH of >or=1 IU/l impaired embryo morphology and lowered the implantation rate, although it increased the number of metaphase II oocytes. CONCLUSIONS: The inclusion of exogenous LH to the ovarian stimulation protocol can have beneficial or detrimental effects on oocyte yield and quality, depending on the level of endogenous LH. These data support the concept of a 'window' for LH requirement in ovarian stimulation.     

Cryo-thawed embryos obtained from conception cycles have double the implantation and pregnancy potential of those from unsuccessful cycles

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of fresh IVF/ICSI cycle outcome on the prognosis of the related frozen embryo replacement (FER) cycle. METHODS: 459 FER cycles, involving 2049 cleavage stage embryos with no or up to 10% fragmentation, were performed for which the outcome of the fresh cycle was recorded. The cycles were divided into two groups; group A included cycles in which cryopreserved embryos were obtained from fresh cycles in which conception occurred. Group B were cycles in which cryopreserved embryos originated from unsuccessful fresh cycles. RESULTS: Groups A and B were comparable with respect to mean (+/- SD) age at cryopreservation (33 +/- 3.9 versus 33.2 +/- 4 years, P = not significant), mean number of oocytes retrieved and fertilized normally in the fresh cycle (11 +/- 5.2 versus 11.2 +/- 4.8, P = not significant) and mean age at the cryo-thawed transfer (34.5 +/- 4.2 versus 33.9 +/- 4 years, P = not significant). No significant difference was found between the two groups with regard to mean number of embryos cryopreserved (6.5 +/- 3.9 versus 6.2 +/- 3.6) and subsequently thawed (4.5 +/- 2.5 versus 4.5 +/- 1.8) per cycle and number of cryo-thawed embryos transferred per cycle (2.0 +/- 0.7 versus 2.1 +/- 0.8). However, the implantation rate per transferred embryo in group A was double that in group B (23 versus 11.2%, P < 0.0001). Moreover, the clinical pregnancy and ongoing pregnancy rates per cycle were significantly higher in group A compared with group B (34.8 and 27.3% versus 15.6 and 13.1%, P < 0.0001 and P = 0.0003 respectively). The difference in FER cycle outcome could not be explained by confounding variables. CONCLUSIONS: After thawing, cryopreserved embryos originating from conception IVF/ICSI cycles achieve double the implantation and pregnancy rates of those obtained from unsuccessful cycles.     

The outcome of IVF-embryo transfer treatment in patients who develop three follicles or less

Among 828 patients undergoing IVF-embryo transfer treatment, the implantation and pregnancy rates of patients who developed < or = 3 follicles were compared prospectively with those patients who had a normal response. Patients who developed 1 to 3 follicles during ovarian stimulation elected to proceed with oocyte collection, have intrauterine insemination if appropriate, or to have their cycle cancelled. In the group of patients who developed < or = 3 follicles and who were aged <40 years, despite a significantly lower number of oocytes collected [2 versus 7; median difference (MD) = 9; confidence interval (CI) = 7-11, and lower number of embryos developed and transferred (1 versus 3; MD = 2; CI = 1-2), no difference in either implantation rate [27.8 versus 20.4%; odds ratio (OR) = 1.58; CI = 0.46-4.54] or pregnancy rate (27.8 versus 36.7%; OR = 0.7; CI = 0.2-2.0) was noted when compared with similarly aged patients who developed >3 follicles. However, in patients aged >40 years who developed < or = 3 follicles, a moderate, albeit non-significant decrease in implantation rate (3.8 versus 7.8%; OR = 1.91; CI = 0.4-57.0) and pregnancy rate (4.2 versus 18.3%; OR = 1.92; CI = 0.38-57.0) was observed when compared with patients of a similar age who developed >3 follicles. Patients aged <40 years, unlike older patients, maintain good implantation and pregnancy rates despite a poor response to ovarian stimulation. This study indicates that for this group of women, continuation of IVF treatment is a better option than cancellation.     

GnRH agonist (buserelin) or hCG for ovulation induction in GnRH antagonist IVF/ICSI cycles: a prospective randomized study

BACKGROUND: We aimed to determine the efficacy of ovarian hyperstimulation protocols employing a GnRH antagonist to prevent a premature LH rise allowing final oocyte maturation and ovulation to be induced by a single bolus of either a GnRH agonist or hCG. METHODS: A total of 122 normogonadotrophic patients following a flexible antagonist protocol was stimulated with recombinant human FSH and prospectively randomized (sealed envelopes) to ovulation induction with a single bolus of either 0.5 mg buserelin s.c. (n = 55) or 10,000 IU of hCG (n = 67). A maximum of two embryos was transferred. Luteal support consisted of micronized progesterone vaginally, 90 mg a day, and estradiol, 4 mg a day per os. RESULTS: Ovulation was induced with GnRH agonist in 55 patients and hCG in 67 patients. Significantly more metaphase II (MII) oocytes were retrieved in the GnRH agonist group (P < 0.02). Significantly higher levels of LH and FSH (P < 0.001) and significantly lower levels of progesterone and estradiol (P < 0.001) were seen in the GnRH agonist group during the luteal phase. The implantation rate, 33/97 versus 3/89 (P < 0.001), clinical pregnancy rate, 36 versus 6% (P = 0.002), and rate of early pregnancy loss, 4% versus 79% (P = 0.005), were significantly in favour of hCG. CONCLUSIONS: Ovulation induction with a GnRH agonist resulted in significantly more MII oocytes. However, a significantly lower implantation rate and clinical pregnancy rate in addition to a significantly higher rate of early pregnancy loss was seen in the GnRH agonist group, most probably due to a luteal phase deficiency.     

Inhibin A and inhibin B reflect ovarian function in assisted reproduction but are less useful at predicting outcome

To test the hypothesis that dimeric inhibin A and/or inhibin B concentrations represent improved markers of in-vitro fertilization (IVF) outcome over follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), 78 women who achieved pregnancy within three assisted reproduction treatment cycles were matched to 78 women who underwent at least three assisted reproductive treatment cycles and failed to achieve pregnancy. Baseline serum inhibin B and FSH were obtained between days 1 and 4 in a cycle prior to ovarian stimulation, and inhibin A and B were measured immediately before the ovulatory stimulus and in follicular fluid from the lead follicle. Comparing pregnant and non-pregnant subjects at baseline, younger age (34.0 +/- 0.5 versus 36.0 +/- 0.5 years; P < 0.003) and a combination of FSH lower than the median value (11.2 IU/l) and inhibin B higher than the median value (76.5 pg/ml) were associated with pregnancy (P < 0.03), but FSH (11.7 +/- 0.5 versus 12.9 +/- 0.9 IU/ml) and inhibin B (89.0 +/- 10.2 versus 79.7 +/- 7.7 pg/ml) were not independently associated. At the time of the ovulatory stimulus, serum inhibin A (52.8 +/- 3.8 versus 40.0 +/- 2.7 IU/ml; P < 0.004), inhibin B (1623.8 +/- 165.1 versus 859.2 +/- 94.8 pg/ml; P < 0.0009) and the number of oocytes retrieved (14.6 +/- 0.8 versus 10.1 +/- 0.6; P < 0.0001) were predictive of pregnancy when controlled for age. Inhibin A was correlated with the number of embryos (r = 0.4; P < 0.0001). However, neither inhibin A nor inhibin B provided additional information in predicting successful outcome over age and number of oocytes. We conclude that: (i) in patients undergoing assisted reproductive technology, age and number of oocytes retrieved are the strongest predictors of success; (ii) of the parameters available prior to cycle initiation, a combination of lower FSH and higher inhibin B was associated with a greater chance for a successful outcome but an absolute cut-off could not be defined; and (iii) during ovarian stimulation, higher concentrations of inhibin A and inhibin B in serum are associated with successful IVF and mark ovarian reserve as a measure of oocyte number and quality.     

Prospective hatching of embryos developed from oocytes exhibiting difficult oolemma penetration during ICSI

BACKGROUND: The hormonal milieu during ovarian stimulation is known to affect oolemma behaviour as well as zona pellucida thickness and structure. This led us to investigate whether a special subgroup of patients with oocytes where penetration of the oolemma is difficult during ICSI may benefit from assisted hatching. METHODS: A total of 77 couples (mean age: 32.9 +/- 4.6 years; range: 22-38) had oocytes that could hardly be penetrated by the ICSI pipette. Nineteen patients underwent two ICSI cycles, giving a total number of 96 cycles, which were randomly split into either the study group (n = 52) or the non-hatching group (n = 44). Hatching was done using a non-contact 1.48 mm wavelength diode laser. Implantation and pregnancy rates were recorded. RESULTS: The pregnancy rate was 36.6% (19/52) in the study group and 13.6% (6/44) in the non-hatching group (P < 0.05). In addition, a higher number (P < 0.05) of embryos implanted in the study group (23/106; 21.7%) than in the non-hatching group (9/92; 9.8%). CONCLUSIONS: Once oolema penetration during ICSI has proven difficult, prospective hatching of embryos considered for transfer may increase their implantation behaviour.     

High doses of gonadotrophins combined with stop versus non-stop protocol of GnRH analogue administration in low responder IVF patients: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial

Recent evidence suggests that early cessation of gonadotrophin releasing hormone analogue (GnRHa) administration may offer some benefit to low responder patients undergoing IVF. A prospective, randomized controlled trial was designed to evaluate whether early cessation of GnRHa in an ovarian stimulation regimen is more beneficial than just increasing the doses of gonadotrophins. Seventy low responder patients (less than three mature follicles in a previous cycle) with normal basal follicle stimulating hormone concentrations and a previous cancelled IVF cycle were randomly allocated into two protocols: (i) non-stop protocol: long GnRHa suppression with high doses of gonadotrophins, and (ii) stop protocol, in which GnRHa administration is stopped with the onset of menses, while gonadotrophin doses remained similar to the non-stop protocol. A significantly higher number of mature oocytes were obtained in the study group (stop protocol) compared to the control group (non-stop protocol) (8.7 +/- 0.9 versus 6.2 +/- 0.7, P: = 0. 027). The stop protocol reduced the number of ampoules of gonadotrophins required (56.6 +/- 2.7 versus 68.0 +/- 3.5, P: = 0. 013). Both protocols resulted in a similar cancellation rate (2.7 versus 5.8%) (with no cycles cancelled due to ovulation), pregnancy rate (14.3 versus 18.7%), and implantation rate (12.1 versus 8.8%). The early cessation of GnRHa combined with high doses of gonadotrophins permitted the retrieval of a significantly higher number of oocytes.