不同桩核微渗漏情况的体外研究

目的 :比较成品桩钉加复合树脂核、传统银汞桩核和粘结银汞桩核冠向微渗漏情况 ,探讨粘结银汞桩核在后牙修复中的应用前景。方法 :30颗新拔除的磨牙分为 3组 ,分别用成品桩钉加复合树脂核、传统银汞桩核和粘结银汞桩核修复后放入印度墨水中 1周 ,另选择 10颗磨牙作为阴性和阳性对照 ,评价冠方微渗漏情况。结果 :粘结银汞桩核微渗漏明显小于传统银汞桩核 (P <0 .0 1) ;传统银汞桩核与成品桩钉加复合树脂核差异无显著性 (P >0 .0 5 )。结论 :粘结银汞桩核修复可有效降低微渗漏 ,预防桩核修复后因微渗漏导致的并发症     

Repair of non-carious amalgam margin defects

This study investigated the microleakage associated with the repair of non-carious amalgam defects using flowable resin composite. Occlusal amalgam preparations were accomplished on 36 non-carious mandibular molars. A standardized 40-micron marginal defect was made by condensing amalgam against a mylar matrix strip. Specimens then underwent a corrosion protocol designed to simulate intraoral corrosion seen with amalgam restorations. The resultant specimens were divided into three treatment groups: 1) No treatment (control); 2) Air abrasion of the amalgam defect surface, acid etching of both amalgam and enamel surfaces, then placement of a flowable composite and 3) Air abrasion of the amalgam defect, application of a fifth-generation dentin bonding agent and placement of the flowable composite. Specimens were thermocycled, sealed with glass ionomer and fingernail polish to within 1 mm of repaired margins, then immersed in basic fuchsin for 24 hours. Specimens were sectioned and microleakage assessed. Results indicated that a flowable resin composite significantly reduced marginal microleakage compared to the control (p < 0.05). There was no difference in microleakage between flowable resin composite repairs done with or without the use of a dentin-bonding agent.     

Coronal microleakage of temporary restorations in previously restored teeth with amalgam and composite

AIM: This study evaluated microleakage at the interface between various temporary restorative materials and existing amalgam or composite restorations, and dental tissues in previously restored teeth after partial removal of the restoration. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The distal half of amal gam (Ag) and composite restorations (Co) in 45 teeth were removed, then filled with temporary restorative materials (IRM, Coltosol and CLIP). After thermal cycling, microleakage was measured microscopically as the penetration of basic fuchsine according to a four-unit-scale: The data were evaluated with Friedman and Kruskal-Wallis tests using Bonferroni correction (p < 0.05). RESULTS: In almost all groups except the Co-IRM and Ag-CLIP interface, lower microleakage values were observed in temporary restoration-permanent restoration interfaces compared to temporary restoration-tooth interfaces. For the Ag and Co groups except for the Ag-IRM-b interfaces, the highest microleakage values were observed with IRM for b and c interfaces followed by Coltosol and CLIP. Interestingly, although CLIP was a temporary restoration, CLIP-tooth interface (Ag-CLIP-c) values were lower than amalgam-tooth interface (Ag-CLIP-a) values. CONCLUSIONS: CLIP provided a better seal against microleakage at amalgam and especially composite interfaces. This material also provided a better seal against microleakage at the tooth tissue interface. The use of a resin based temporary restorative material over partially removed resin composite restorations could be beneficial in achieving better resistance to marginal leakage. Within the limitations of this study, maintaining partially removed permanent restorations does not seem to cause a problem with achieving marginal seal.     

An in vitro study of coronal microleakage around bonded amalgam coronal-radicular cores in endodontically treated molar teeth.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the coronal microleakage of conventional and bonded amalgam coronal-radicular (Nayyar) restorations on endodontically treated molar teeth, because coronal seal is a major factor in the long-term success of endodontic treatment. METHOD AND MATERIALS: Forty extracted human molar teeth were root-filled and prepared for coronal-radicular amalgam restorations. Four groups of 10 teeth were restored with Tytin amalgam and Vitrebond, Superbond D Liner II, Panavia 21, or no adhesive agent. The teeth were placed in India ink for 1 week, and then demineralized and rendered transparent. The ink penetration was assessed with a coded scoring system. RESULTS: The bonded amalgam groups produced significantly less leakage than did the nonbonded group. No statistically significant differences in leakage were detected among the bonded amalgam groups. CONCLUSION: To prevent the reinfection of the endodontically treated molar, it may be preferable to restore the tooth immediately after obturation by employing a bonded amalgam coronal-radicular technique.     

Evaluation of dental adhesive systems with amalgam and resin composite restorations: comparison of microleakage and bond strength results

A variety of laboratory tests have been developed to assist in predicting the clinical performance of dental restorative materials. Additionally, more than one methodology is in use for many types of tests performed in vitro. This project assessed and compared results derived from two specific laboratory testing methods, one for bond strength and one for microleakage. Seven multi-purpose dental adhesives were tested with the two methodologies in both amalgam and resin composite restorations. Bond strength was determined with a punch-out method in sections of human molar dentin. Microleakage was analyzed with a digital imaging system (Image-Pro Plus, Version 1.3) to determine the extent of dye penetration in Class V preparations centered at the CEJ on both the buccal and lingual surfaces of human molar teeth. There were 32 treatment groups (n = 10); seven experimental (dental adhesives) and one control (copal varnish, 37% phosphoric acid) followed by restoration with either amalgam or resin composite. Specimens were thermocycled 500 times in 5 degrees and 55 degrees C water with a one-minute dwell time. Bond strength and microleakage values were determined for each group. ANOVA and Student-Newman-Keuls tests demonstrated an interaction between restorative material and adhesive system with a significant difference among adhesives (p < 0.05). Using a multi-purpose adhesive system resulted in both a statistically significant increase in bond strength and a statistically significant decrease in extent of microleakage (p < 0.05). The effect of the adhesive upon both microleakage and bond strength was greater in the resin composite restorations than in the amalgam restorations. Bond strength testing was more discriminating than microleakage evaluation in identifying differences among materials.     

不同粘结剂与桩核材料微渗漏发生的实验研究

目的：评价不同核材料修复后的牙齿经铸造金属全冠修复后边缘微渗漏的情况。方法：将90个大小相似的完好前磨牙,随机分为9个实验组。对离体牙进行铸造金属全冠及固定尺寸的Ⅱ类洞牙体预备后,分别用3种不同的核材料（树脂、银汞合金、铸造合金）充填窝洞。常规方法铸造镍铬合金全冠,用3种不同的粘结材料（聚羧酸锌、玻璃离子、树脂C＆B）进行粘固。温度循环、染色、包埋后,标本片切,镜下观察冠边缘及核下微漏情况。结果：银汞核与树脂核下微漏小于铸造核（P〈0.05）,树脂粘结剂抗微漏性能优于聚羧酸锌水门汀和玻璃离子粘结剂（P〈0.05）。结论：树脂粘接剂抗微漏性能优于玻璃离子与聚羧酸锌粘结剂。树脂核在预先对粘结面处理后,其抗微漏性能与银汞核近似,优于铸造合金核。     

Microleakage and SEM interfacial micromorphology of amalgam restorations using three adhesive systems

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the microleakage and interfacial micromorphology of Class V cervical amalgam restorations lined with OptiBond, AElitebond, or Panavia 21. METHODS: Unlined amalgams served as control. Cavities were treated with each dentin bonding system according to the manufacturers' instructions and restored with Tytin non-gamma 2 spherical amalgam. After one week of storage in tap water at 37 degrees C, the specimens were thermocycled (1000 cycles, 6-60 degrees C, 30s dwell time). Microleakage was assessed by means of basic fuchsin dye penetration and recorded according to an ordinal scale. RESULTS: None of the systems tested in this study completely eliminated microleakage. Kruskal-Wallis one-way ANOVA and Mann-Whitney U test found that on the occlusal wall, Panavia 21 and the control group had the least leakage (P<0.05). No statistically significant differences were found at dentin margins (P>0.05). Wilcoxon matched pairs signed rank test found that Panavia 21 and the control group had less leakage at the occlusal than at the dentin margins (P<0.05); when AElitebond and OptiBond groups were evaluated, microleakage at the enamel and at the dentin margins was similar for each group. With the adhesive systems, perhaps the hydrophilic bonding agents incorporated the dye during specimen immersion and/or sectioning. CONCLUSIONS: The use of adhesives may not be as worthy as resin cements for sealing and bonding amalgam restorations to enamel and dentin.     

Marginal adaptation of amalgam and resin composite restorations in Class II conservative preparations.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare and contrast the performance, in terms of marginal adaptation, of a non-gamma-2 amalgam alloy with a compact-filled light-cured composite in the restoration of Class II preparations of conservative design. METHOD AND MATERIALS: Fifty recently extracted teeth were selected for the study. The teeth were restored with either a non-gamma-2 amalgam alloy, Dispersalloy, or a compact-filled resin composite, Z100, using standard techniques. The marginal adaptation of the restorative materials to the proximal surface outline form of each preparation was assessed at magnification x30. RESULTS: Highly significant differences were demonstrated in the mean percentages of perfect margins in all 3 segments of the proximal boxes of the restorations with the resin composite performing significantly better than the amalgam. The percentages of marginal fissuring were significantly higher in the amalgam restorations, except at the cervical margin, where the incidence of fissuring was almost the same for the amalgam and resin composite restorations. The resin composite restorations had significantly fewer underfilled margins than the amalgam restorations. CONCLUSION: In the conservative Class II preparations, the amalgam restorations were of poor quality with respect to marginal adaptation, compared with the resin composite restorations. It is suggested that the use of amalgam as a control in a clinical evaluation of resin composite restorations in conservative preparations cannot be justified, because it is apparently not possible to compare restorations of equivalent initial quality.     

The bonding of an adhesive resin cement to single and combined adherends encountered in resin-bonded bridge work: an in vitro study.

Although resin-bonded bridges should ideally be bonded to enamel, abutment teeth may present with dentine or restorations at the bonding sites. This study assessed the influence of bonding to such adherends on bridge retention by using tensile bond strength measurements as the criteria for judgement. An adhesive resin cement (Panavia Ex) was bonded to single adherends of enamel, dentine, composite resin, glass ionomer or amalgam, and to combined adherends of enamel/dentine or enamel/restorative material. The bond strength to enamel (28 MPa) was comparable with that to composite resin (25 MPa), but significantly higher than to dentine (8 MPa), amalgam (8 MPa) and glass ionomer (13 MPa). When the bonding area was half enamel and half restorative material, the bond strength was only equivalent to that obtained when the entire bonding area consisted of restorative material, the less favourable adherend. A similar trend was observed with specimens of enamel/dentine. This indicated that the magnitude of the bond between the resin cement and combined adherends was limited by the strength of the bond to the less favourable adherend. It appears that extending a bridge retainer to cover exposed dentine, a glass-ionomer filling or an amalgam filling, could adversely affect the bridge retention.     

Adhesion of Indirect MOD Resin Composite Inlays Luted With Self-adhesive and Self-etching Resin Cements

SUMMARY This study investigated the effect of loading on the bond strength to dentin and microleakage of MOD indirect composite restorations bonded with self-adhesive and self-etching resin cements with or without acid etching of the proximal enamel margins. Class II MOD cavities were prepared in 48 molar teeth into dentin and divided into three groups of 16 teeth. Impressions were taken and indirect composite inlays fabricated (Estenia C & B). The enamel margins of the proximal boxes of half the specimens were phosphoric acid etched, and the inlays were cemented with one of three cements (Panavia F 2.0, SA Cement, or Rely X Unicem). After luting, eight teeth in each cement group were mechanically loaded at 2.5 cycles/s for 250,000 cycles. Unloaded teeth acted as controls. Teeth were stored in Rhodamine B solution for 24 hours, sectioned buccolingually at the proximal boxes to examine microleakage using confocal microscopy, and further sectioned for μTBS testing of the resin-dentin interface. Analysis of variance was performed to assess the effect of loading and acid etching on microleakage and bond strength. Acid etching had no effect on microleakage. No significant difference in the dentin bond strengths between the three cements existed after loading. Panavia F 2.0 exhibited a significant reduction in bond strength. With regard to microleakage at the proximal boxes, loading had no effect on dye penetration at the cavity floor. However, at the axial walls, loading had a significant deleterious effect on Panavia F 2.0. No difference in microleakage existed between the three cements at both sites before and after loading. In conclusion, the two tested self-adhesive cements exhibited similar bond strengths before and after loading to the self-etching resin cement. Loading reduced dentin bond strengths and increased microleakage at the resin-dentin interface. However, acid etching of the enamel margins had no significant effect on microleakage in the approximal regions of the bonded inlays.     

In vitro evaluation of microleakage of indirect composite inlays cemented with four luting agents

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Microleakage around dental restorations is implicated in the occurrence of secondary carious lesions, adverse pulpal response, and reduced restoration longevity. PURPOSE: The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the microleakage of indirect resin composite inlays cemented with 4 luting agents. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Standardized Class V inlay preparations overlapping the cemento-enamel junction were prepared on the buccal and lingual surfaces of 40 extracted human mandibular third molars. Eighty postpolymerized, heat-treated resin composite inlays (Targis, 72 specimens, 8 controls) were processed in stone replicas and cemented into the preparations using 4 luting agents (n = 18 + 2 controls for each cement group): a resin composite used with a bonding agent (Variolink II/Excite), a resin composite used with a self-etching primer, but without bonding agent (Panavia F/ED Primer), a modified resin composite used with a bonding agent (Resinomer/One Step), and a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement (Fuji Plus). Thirty-six inlays (n = 9 + 1 control) were subjected to thermal cycling (2000 cycles, 5 degrees C/55 degrees C), whereas the other 36 were not. All the teeth were then immersed in 1% methylene blue dye solution for 48 hours. Microleakage score, margin location (enamel/cementum), thermal cycling history, and preparation location (buccal/lingual) were analyzed using a multivariate model (alpha = .05). Multivariate analysis was performed using a polychotomous logistic regression. RESULTS: The preparation location had no significant effect on dye penetration. The margin location (enamel or cementum) and the thermal cycling had a significant effect on microleakage (odds ratios [ORs] = 17.6 and 8.04, respectively). In comparing the 3 resin-based luting agents (Variolink II, Panavia F, and Resinomer) to Fuji Plus, Panavia F exhibited the lowest significant overall microleakage (OR = 0.09), followed by Variolink II (significant OR equal to 0.43), whereas Resinomer demonstrated the greatest significant overall microleakage (OR = 1.35). CONCLUSION: Within the experimental conditions of this in vitro study, thermal cycling significantly increased microleakage (OR = 8.04). The overall microleakage at the enamel margins was significantly lower than the overall microleakage at the cementum margins for the 4 luting agents tested (OR = 17.6).     

Microleakage in conventional and bonded amalgam restorations: influence of cavity volume

This study verified the relationship between the volume and microleakage of conventional and bonded amalgam restorations. Also, the microleakage influence of intermediate materials, substrates and the direction of sectioning was investigated. Fifty-six bovine incisors were selected. Standard Class V cavities were prepared in buccal and lingual surfaces. For each tooth, two cavity sizes were prepared, corresponding to two cavity volumes: one larger (A) and the other smaller (B). The cervical wall was located in cementum/dentin and the incisal wall in enamel. The teeth were distributed in four groups (n=28) according to the intermediate material employed (glass-ionomer cement, resin cement, adhesive system and copal varnish-control). The materials were applied following manufacturers' directions. After restoration, the teeth were submitted to thermal cycling. They were then immersed in a dye solution and sectioned in two directions inciso-cervical (IC) and mesio-distal (MD) sections to evaluate the microleakage. Data were subjected to non-parametric statistical analysis (Wilcoxon's paired test and Kruskal-Wallis test). No significant difference was found between the two cavity sizes. Leakage in enamel was statistically lower than in the cementum/dentin interface (p < 0.05). In some situations, glass-ionomer or resin cement lined amalgam restorations presented less dye leakage than copal varnish lined restorations (p < 0.05). No significant difference was observed in microleakage between IC or MD sectioning. Within the limitations of this study, it was concluded that cavity size and direction of section were not significant factors for microleakage, while substrate and intermediate materials had a significant effect on the sealing ability in amalgam restorations.     

Microleakage of endodontically treated teeth restored with fiber posts and composite cores after cyclic loading: a confocal microscopic study

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: The effectiveness of the seal obtained with carbon fiber posts and composite cores is still unclear. Both 3-step dental adhesives and self-etching adhesive primers have been suggested as adhesive systems. PURPOSE: This confocal microscopic study evaluated the microleakage of teeth endodontically treated and restored with fiber posts and composites with 3 adhesive systems. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 72 human mandibular premolars were endodontically treated and divided into 6 groups of 12 teeth each. The first 3 groups were treated with an endodontic sealer containing zinc oxide-eugenol (ZOE) and restored with temporary filling materials containing ZOE. The last 3 groups were treated with ZOE-free materials. Post spaces were prepared in the root canals. The first group treated with ZOE-based materials was restored with fiber posts cemented with zinc phosphate cement and composite cores without adhesive. The other 2 groups of ZOE-treated teeth were restored with fiber posts cemented with All Bond 2 and Panavia 21 dental adhesives, respectively. The last 3 groups were restored with fiber posts cemented with All Bond 2, Panavia 21, and Panavia Fluoro cement, respectively. The teeth were loaded intermittently at 2 cycles per second in a moist environment and, after 300,000 cycles, immersed in a solution of Rhodamine B dye for 48 hours. A confocal microscope was used to observe the teeth. The ratio between the length of the interfaces observed and the length of the dye penetration was evaluated. Two teeth from each group acted as controls and were not subjected to dynamic loads. RESULTS: All resin cement groups leaked significantly less than the group cemented with zinc phosphate cement. No statistically significant difference was found between the microleakage of teeth treated with ZOE-based and non-ZOE-based materials. Teeth restored with All Bond 2 dental adhesive leaked significantly less than those restored with Panavia cement. CONCLUSION: The 3-step dental adhesive (All Bond 2) resulted in a better marginal seal than that obtained with the self-etching primers (Panavia 21 and Panavia F). The use of endodontic sealers and temporary filling materials containing ZOE had no detrimental effect on the marginal seal of carbon fiber post/composite resin core restorations.     

Microleakage of bonded amalgam restorations: effect of thermal cycling

This study examined the effect of thermal cycling on the microleakage of bonded amalgam restorations. Three dental amalgam alloys and a gallium alloy were tested with two adhesive resin systems and copal varnish as a control. Class V cavity preparations were prepared on 168 freshly extracted premolars or molars. The preparations were placed parallel to and 1.0 mm occlusal to the cementoenamel junction (CEJ). Four groups of 42 teeth each were treated with one of the following adhesive dentin systems: Bond-It, All-Bond 2/Resinomer or a copal varnish (Copalite). The four groups of 42 teeth each were then restored with one of three dental amalgams: Orosphere Plus, Indiloy, Oralloy or a Gallium alloy (Galloy), resulting in 12 test groups of 14 teeth each. The specimens were stored in double distilled water at 37 degrees C for 24 hours. Final contouring and polishing of the restorations were performed under water spray. Half of the restorations in each group were thermocycled for 3000 cycles (5 degrees C-37 degrees C-55 degrees C-37 degrees C) with a dwell time of 15 sec at each temperature. The other half were stored in double distilled water at 37 degrees C for 24 hours. Then all 168 restorations were stained with dye, sectioned and scored for microleakage. Results showed that the adhesive dentin systems reduced microleakage in amalgam restorations compared to copal varnish only in non-thermocycled specimens. Statistical analysis of the results showed that there was an extremely significant difference (p < 0.001) in microleakage between the non-thermocycled and the thermocycled specimens in all test groups, whereas, there was no significant difference (p > 0.05) among thermocycled specimens. The reduction of microleakage was not significantly different between Bond-It and All-Bond 2/Resinomer in non-thermocycled specimens. Oralloy showed the most microleakage in the non-thermocycled groups when compared to the other alloys using the same adhesive liner.     

Review of bonded amalgam restorations, and assessment in a general practice over five years

This study reviewed the literature on bonded amalgam restorations and assessed the failure, marginal fracture and marginal staining behavior of 366 Permite C amalgam restorations lined with five dentin bonding resins (Scotchbond 2, Panavia Ex, Amalgambond, Amalgambond Plus, Geristore) and a polyamide cavity varnish (Barrier). The restorations were placed in the posterior permanent teeth of 190 adult patients and examined at intervals over periods of up to five years. There were five restoration failures (1.4%), usually from tooth fracture, involving Class II preparations in molar teeth. No instances of persistent pulpal sensitivity or recurrent caries were reported. The marginal deterioration of the restorations was assessed indirectly using photographs for comparison with two standard sets of enlarged color transparencies. Most of the marginal fracture and marginal staining scores were low, with little difference between the six lining materials at any period.     

Microleakage of resin composite restorations with glass-ceramic inserts.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of glass-ceramic inserts and different application techniques of resin composites on marginal leakage. METHOD AND MATERIALS: Three groups of 10 standardized, round, Class V cavities were prepared on the buccal surface of 30 extracted human molar teeth. Group 1 received resin composite restorations, placed in one increment (bulk). Group 2 received resin composite restorations that were placed in two increments, and group 3 received resin composite restorations with beta-quartz ceramic inserts. After the teeth were thermocycled and placed in 0.5% basic fuchsin for 24 hours, they were sectioned and examined for microleakage. RESULTS: On the occlusal margins, there was no statistically significant difference between the restorations placed with the incremental technique and the restorations with beta-quartz inserts. The restorations placed with the bulk technique had significantly more microleakage than did the others. On the gingival margins, the restorations with beta-quartz inserts exhibited significantly less microleakage than did the other groups. The restorations placed with the bulk technique showed significantly more dye penetration than did the others. CONCLUSION: The use of a glass-ceramic insert reduced the marginal leakage of Class V resin composite restorations.     

Effect of a copal varnish, ZOE or glass ionomer cement bases on microleakage of amalgam restorations

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the sealing ability of four cavity preparation treatment modalities under amalgam restorations. Class V cavity preparations were placed in 20 extracted teeth and randomly divided into four groups of five teeth each (10 restorations for each group): 1) no liner; 2) two applications of Copalite; 3) a base of IRM; and 4) a base of Chelon-Silver. After assigned cavity preparation treatment was accomplished, the teeth were restored with amalgam. The restored teeth were subjected to thermocycling and subsequently stained with basic fuchsin. The teeth were longitudinally sectioned and dye penetration recorded. Amalgam restorations with a Copalite or Chelon-Silver base exhibited significantly less microleakage than those amalgam restorations with an IRM base or no cavity preparation treatment. With the Copalite varnish, microleakage extended beyond the axial wall (toward the pulp chamber through the dentinal tubules) while with the Chelon-Silver base, microleakage was limited to the restoration-tooth interface.     

Microleakage of posterior composite restorations

Several composite restorative resins have recently been introduced for use in posterior teeth. A number of dentin bonding agents are commercially available for use in conjunction with composite restorative resins. The objective of this in vitro study was to evaluate the microleakage of Class II MOD preparations in extracted human mandibular molar teeth restored with a chemically-activated posterior composite resin (P 10) and a visible light-cured composite resin (P 30) used in conjunction with a low viscosity bonding resin (Enamel Bond) and a dentin bonding resin (Scotchbond), respectively. The restored teeth were subjected to 100 complete temperature cycles in an aqueous ⁴⁵CaCl₂ solution between 5°C and 55°C and the microleakage evaluated from autoradiographs. Microleakage was observed at the cervical aspects of all the restorations. The results of this in vitro study suggest that microleakage may occur at these sites of posterior composite restorations.     

In vivo and in vitro evaluations of microleakage around Class I amalgam and composite restorations

This study evaluated and compared microleakage values of in vivo and in vitro placed Class I amalgam restorations with or without three different lining materials and posterior composite restorations with two dentin bonding agents. For the in vivo group, 72 standardized Class I cavities were prepared on the occlusal surfaces of molars scheduled for extraction. The test groups (n = 12) were: amalgam without lining (A), amalgam with cavity varnish (A+C), amalgam with Clearfil SE Bond (A+CSE), amalgam with Clearfil 2V (A+C2V), composite with Clearfil SE Bond (C+CSE) and composite with Protect Bond (C+PB). The restored teeth were extracted after seven days. The same grouping, materials and techniques were used in 72 extracted molars for the in-vitro part of the study. The specimens were immersed in basic fuchsin for 24 hours and sectioned. Microleakage was examined and scored at 20x magnification. Statistical analyses were performed with the Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U-tests with the 5% level of significance. Overall, the in vivo and in vitro test groups were not different from each other. No significant differences in microleakage values were observed between the unlined and lined amalgam groups (p > 0.05). However, since lined amalgam restorations did not reveal any marginal leakage, the application of an adhesive bonding material under the amalgam restorations can be considered. In general, cavity varnish was not as effective as adhesive bonding agents in preventing microleakage in amalgam restorations. Composite restorations demonstrated higher leakage values than amalgam restorations (p < 0.05), except for A+C (p > 0.05) in the in vivo group. There was no significant difference between the two composite groups for in vitro and in vivo conditions (p > 0.05).     

不同桩核冠向微渗漏的比较研究

目的 研究铸造镍铬合金桩核、黏接银汞桩核、传统银汞桩核和纤维树脂桩核的冠向微渗漏情况,为临床桩核的选择提供依据.方法 选择60颗新拔除的人上颌磨牙,随机分为6组,其中4组分别制作铸造镍铬合金桩核、黏接银汞桩核、传统银汞桩核和纤维树脂桩核,另2组分别为阳性和阴性对照,然后浸入印度墨水中1周,评价不同桩核的冠向微渗漏情况.结果 4个实验组微渗漏明显小于阳性对照组(P ＜ 0.05);纤维树脂桩核组和黏接银汞桩核组微渗漏明显小于传统银汞桩核组和铸造镍铬合金桩核组(P ＜ 0.05).结论 各种桩核修复都可在一定程度上减小微渗漏,其中黏接银汞桩核和纤维树脂桩核修复更为有效.