Hemodynamic function of the standard St. Jude bileaflet disc valve has no clinical impact 10 years after aortic valve replacement

OBJECTIVES: Size mismatch and impaired left ventricular function have been shown to determine the hemodynamic function of the standard St. Jude bileaflet disc valve early after aortic valve replacement (AVR). We aimed to analyse St. Jude valve hemodynamic function and its clinical impact in the survivors of a prospective series 10 years after AVR for aortic stenosis. DESIGN: Forty-three survivors aged 32-90 years from a prospective series attended a follow-up study with Doppler echo and radionuclide cardiography 10 years after AVR for aortic stenosis. Six patients with significant left sided valve regurgitation were excluded from further analysis: they had significantly lower St. Jude valve gradient and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and larger mass index (LVMi) than 37 without. RESULTS: In the 37 patients without left sided valve regurgitation peak and mean gradients were inversely related to St. Jude valve geometric orifice area (GOA) indexed for either body surface area or left ventricular end-diastolic dimension (LVEDD). The gradients correlated directly with LVEDD but not with LVEF or LVMi. Eleven patients with hypertension had higher peak gradients (31+/-13 versus 22+/-8 mmHg, p<0.05), lower LVEF, and higher LVEDD and LVMi than 26 without. Peak gradient was greater than 35 mmHg in five hypertensive patients with normal LVEF but lesser than 30 mmHg in six with impaired LVEF. Supranormal LVEF and severe size mismatch identified the remaining patients (N=3) with peak gradient above 35 mmHg. In a multilinear regression analysis GOA indexed for LVEDD, hypertension, and LVEF were independently related to peak gradient. CONCLUSION: High gradients of the standard St. Jude bileaflet disc valve 10 years after AVR was primarily related to systemic hypertension and mismatch between valve and left ventricular cavity size. Hypertension and left sided valve regurgitation, but not St. Jude valve gradient or size mismatch, were the dominant determinants of left ventricular hypertrophy and impaired function.     

Seven-year performance of the Edwards Prima Plus stentless valve with the intact non-coronary sinus technique

OBJECTIVES: Late results after stentless aortic valve replacement (AVR) may be jeopardized by progressive aortic dilatation. To define functional outcome using the intact non-coronary sinus technique, all patients operated using the stentless Edwards Prima Plus xenograft were assessed. METHODS: Between January 2000 and August 2007, 154 patients, aged 71 +/- 9 years, underwent stentless AVR using a technique, which replaces the non-coronary sinus and stabilizes two of three commissures. Indication was aortic valve stenosis (AS) in 103 (67%) patients: 33 (21%) had bicuspid valve and four endocarditis. Ninety-six (62%) patients were in NYHA III-IV, and 13 (8%) had LVEF <30%. Associated procedures were required in 59 (38%) patients (CABG, 34; ascending aorta, 22; others 3). Study endpoints were survival, freedom from valve-related events, clinical status, and graft function. RESULTS: There were two hospital and two late deaths during a 48 +/- 19 months (1-92) follow-up (97 +/- 3% survival at seven years). Seven-year freedom from structural failure, nonstructural failure, and endocarditis was 99 +/- 1%, 97 +/- 3%, and 98 +/- 2%. Follow-up NYHA (96 vs ten patients in class III-IV, p = 0.001), and cardiac function (13 vs one patient with LVEF <30%, p = 0.02) were improved. Xenograft performance was satisfactory: 0-2 + aortic insufficiency (AI) in 147 (98%) patients, mean trans-prosthetic pressure gradient 8 +/- 4 (0-25 mmHg). Aortic root diameters were comparable to postoperative values (sinus of Valsalva, 36 +/- 8 vs 35 +/- 9 mm, p = ns; sinotubular junction, 32 +/- 7 vs 34 +/- 8 mm, p = ns). CONCLUSIONS: Stentless AVR with non-coronary sinus replacement affords excellent late outcome and low rate of valve-related events, even in complex patients (bicuspid valve, LV failure, and endocarditis). Aortic root dimensions remain stable over time allowing rewarding xenograft function.     

主动脉瓣重度狭窄伴左心室收缩功能受损患者的外科疗效分析

目的分析主动脉瓣置换术在治疗主动脉瓣重度狭窄伴左心室收缩功能受损患者中的疗效。方法回顾性分析2000年1月至2011年12月在第二军医大学长海医院接受手术治疗的主动脉瓣重度狭窄伴左心室收缩功能受损[左心室射血分数（LVEF）〈50％]患者的临床资料,排除二尖瓣狭窄患者。共纳入29例患者,男22例、女7例,年龄14～76（56.3±12．9）岁。将患者手术前后临床及心脏超声心动图相关指标进行比较,评价手术效果,并根据患者LVEF恢复情况,分析可能影响患者术后心脏功能恢复的危险因素。结果术后早期死亡1例。其余28例患者术后主动脉瓣跨瓣压差由（97．6±25．1）mmHg降至（25．0±9．7）mmHg,LVEF由41％±6％增加至56％±11％,左心室舒张／收缩期末直径／容积均较术前明显改善（P均〈0．001）。结论主动脉瓣膜置换术是主动脉瓣重度狭窄伴左心室收缩功能受损患者的有效治疗方法,术后左心室超声指标显著改善。术前左心室扩大程度较低可能更利于术后LVEF的恢复。     

Surgical treatment of subaortic obstruction in adolescent and adults: long-term follow-up

Subaortic stenosis (SAS) is a wide spectrum of anatomical derangements ranging from a discrete fibrous membrane to tortuous fibrous tunnel with or without aortic annulus hypoplasia. We have reviewed 88 patients undergoing surgery for SAS over a 15-year period. There were 47 male and 41 female patients with a mean age of 19.8 +/- 10.6 years (range 11 to 39). Fifty-eight patients had discrete subaortic membrane, and 30 patients had diffuse tunnel subvalvular stenosis. The mean systolic pressure gradients were found to be 86.5 +/- 31.4 mmHg (range 48 to 145 mmHg). Ten patients had mild and 13 patients had moderate-to-severe aortic insufficiency (AI) preoperatively. Nine patients had bicuspid aortic valve. Forty patients (45.4%) had associated cardiac lesions. Isolated membranectomy was performed in six patients. Membranectomy associated with septal myectomy was done in 52 patients. Fifteen patients of them associated hypoplasia of the aortic orifice necessitated aortic valve replacement (AVR) using the Konno-Rastan procedure. Fifteen patients with tunnel SAS and normal aortic valves underwent a combined approach for valve sparing, a modified Konno procedure with patch septoplasty. Also eight patients required AVR because of the severity of AI and five patients aortic reconstruction procedures. Aortic commissurotomy was performed to relief of stenosis in four patients. There were three early deaths (3.4%) and one late death (1.1%) all after the Konno-Rastan procedure. Eight patients (9.1%) had permanent conduction abnormalities. Postoperative left ventricle-aorta gradient was significantly decreased at early postoperative period (p < 0.001) and ranged from 10 to 25 mmHg (mean 14.1 +/- 4.3). Fourteen patients (16.5%) were reoperated for recurrent obstruction or progression of AI. The mean reoperation interval was 4.4 +/- 1.7 years (range 2 to 8 years). Five-year reoperation-free survival was 88.0 +/- 3.6% and 12.5-year reoperation-free survival was 75.5 +/- 7.0%. Our results of aggressive surgical approach of subvalvular aortic stenosis produces relief of obstruction and frees the valve leaflets, significantly reducing associated AI with long-term survival and long-term adequate relief of left ventricular outflow tract obstruction.     

Assessment of blood flow of the internal thoracic artery in patients with aortic stenosis

The number of patients undergoing combined aortic valve replacement (AVR) for aortic stenosis (AS) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) has been increasing. In CABG, the internal thoracic artery (ITA) is the preferred conduit for its long-term patency. Although Doppler studies on ITA have been widely used, flow characteristics of the vessel in patients with AS have not been reported. To evaluate blood flow pattern of the ITA in AS, duplex scanning was performed in 10 patients before and after AVR. Peak systolic velocity was measured, and blood flow was calculated from mean velocity and cross-sectional area. The mean diameters of the vessels were approximately 1.8 mm on both sides. AVR caused an increase in systolic velocities from 61.2 cm/sec to 85.5 cm/sec in right ITA and from 58.4 cm/sec to 84.7 cm/sec in left ITA. The flow volumes increased from 32.2 ml/min to 46.7 ml/min in right and increased from 31.6 ml/min to 46.3 ml/min in left after AVR. In simultaneous AVR for AS and CABG, suitability of the ITA should be assessed before its use, and concomitant AVR may be quite important to provide adequate flow of the ITA as a conduit.     

The influence of valve physiology on outcome following aortic valvotomy for congenital bicuspid valve in children: 30-year results from a single institution.

OBJECTIVE: Aortic valvotomy is widely used for the treatment of congenital aortic stenosis in children. We sought to evaluate whether the predominant post-valvotomy physiology, aortic insufficiency (AI) or aortic stenosis (AS) independently affected patient outcome. METHODS: From 1972-2002, 57 children with congenital aortic stenosis underwent valvotomy. We divided age-matched patients with residual lesions based on their predominant pathology into three groups: Group I (n=14), patients with moderate AI; Group II (n=14), patients with moderate AS, and Group III (n=14), patients with combined AI and AS. Fifteen patients with severe AI or mild residual lesions following valvotomy were excluded from analysis. RESULTS: mean freedom from aortic valve replacement (AVR) was 11.2+/-1.7 years in Group I and 21.5+/-3.9 years in Group II, P=0.05. AVR was required in 11 patients (79%) in Group I vs. only 5 (36%) in Group II, P=0.05. Group III was intermediate, with 9 (64%) requiring AVR. At the time of AVR, patients with aortic stenosis had significantly higher fractional shortening % than those with insufficiency or combined lesions, (Group 1: 38.2+/-7.9 vs. Group II: 46.3+/-5.5 vs. Group III: 39.2+/-3.7, P=0.007). Patients in Group II also had less severely dilated ventricles (mm) than those in the other groups, (Group 1: 50.2+/-12.5 vs. Group II: 39.5+/-8.3 vs. Group III: 49.0+/-8.1, P=0.030). CONCLUSIONS: patients with predominant AI following valvotomy are more likely to need AVR sooner than those with residual stenosis without AI. Therefore, cautious use of repeat valvotomy using maneuvers to avoid AI (small balloons), may prolong freedom from aortic valve replacement in those patients with significant residual AS.     

Coronary artery bypass grafting combined with aortic valve replacement in healthy octogenarians does not increase postoperative risk

OBJECTIVE: Critical aortic stenosis with or without coronary artery disease is increasingly common in octogenarians. Surgery is the treatment of choice, but indications and results of aortic valve replacement (AVR), particularly when combined with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) are debated. We investigated whether the combined procedure of AVR and CABG increased postoperative risk compared with isolated AVR in otherwise healthy octogenarians. DESIGN: In the period 1994-1998, AVR was performed in 94 patients above 80 years, the majority in NYHA class III and IV. Combined AVR and CABG was performed in 52/94 patients. The patients were studied retrospectively by collecting data from hospital records and followed for 0-7 years. RESULTS: Mean age was 82 +/- 2.3 years, sex (male/female) 33/61, left ventricular ejection fraction 70 +/- 18%, transvalvular peak pressure gradient 63 +/- 20 mmHg and aortic valve area 0.5 +/- 0.2 cm(2). Early mortality (< 30 days) was 4/42 (9.5%) after AVR and 4/52 (7.6%) after AVR and CABG (p = NS between groups). Three-year survival was 33/42 (78.5%) after AVR and 42/52 (80.7%) after AVR and CABG (p = NS between groups). CONCLUSION: AVR with concomitant CABG in octogenarians with aortic stenosis who are otherwise healthy, may be performed without increased risk.     

主动脉瓣置换术650例临床分析

目的 总结主动脉瓣人工瓣膜置换术的临床经验.方法 主动脉瓣置换手术650例,年龄11～76岁,平均(43.2±12.6)岁.60岁以上52例.风湿性病变475例,先天性瓣叶畸形58例,退行性变49例,感染性心内膜炎(IE)47例,人工瓣膜感染性心内膜炎4例,外伤性2例.合并升主动脉瘤样扩张或主动脉夹层52例,冠心病36例,陈旧性脑血管意外14例,室间隔缺损10例,房间隔缺损2例,动脉导管未闭7例.心功能Ⅲ级385例,Ⅳ级119例.射血分数(EF)平均0.56±0.11,左室舒张末直径平均(LVED)(58.59±12.55)mm,左室舒张末容积(KVEDV)(191.58±89.88)ml,主动脉瓣跨瓣压差13.00～118.25 mm Hg(1mmHg=0.133kda).生物瓣占8.77%.主动脉瓣二次置换9例,同期行冠状动脉旁路术36例,主动脉大血管手术52例.体外循环110～208 mnin,升主动脉阻断54～129min.结果 人工瓣膜直径≤21 mm者术后跨瓣压差平均为30.00 mm Hg,直径>21 mm者术后跨瓣压差平均为23.00mmHg,差异有统计学意义.术后30d内死亡40例,1987-1996年死亡29例(9.21%);1997-2007年死亡11例(3.28%).平均随访58个月.结论 随着手术技术、心肌保护技术和围术期处理技术的提高,生物瓣的使用和对合并缺血性心脏病病人的再血管化,手术并发症和病死率明显下降.     

Changing strategy for aortic stenosis with coronary artery disease by transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is combined with aortic stenosis (AS) in 40–50 % of patients with typical angina. Recently, transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has changed the guideline for AS in patients with high comorbidity. At the same time more than 60 % of isolated CABG has been performed without cardiopulmonary bypass in Japan. CABG is recommended and should be considered in patients with primary indication for AVR and luminal stenosis >70 % in major coronary arteries and the left internal thoracic artery (LITA) by guidelines. AVR is indicated for severe AS undergoing CABG. It is generally accepted to perform AVR for moderate AS at the time of CABG by valve guidelines. However, prophylactic AVR for moderate AS associated with CABG may increase the early operative risk and expose the patients to postoperative long-term valve related complications. AVR after previous CABG poses potential risk for mortality and morbidity. The presence of patent ITA is a significant risk of its injury and difficulty of myocardial protection during aortic cross-clamping. Therefore, at present, for severe AS previous CABG with patent ITA should be one of the definite indications of TAVI. Rationale of TAVI in patients with severe AS and CAD has not been clearly delineated. The safety of TAVI irrespective of the extent and anatomy of CAD is still controversial. PCI is not appropriate before TAVI in high-risk patients with CAD. In the near future hybrid TAVI will be realistic considering least operative mortality and morbidity in high-risk patients.     

Surgical management of aortic valve disease in elderly patients with and without coronary artery disease: influence on quality of life

AIM: The feasibility of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) concomitant with aortic valve replacement (AVR) is well established. However, its impact on long-term patient-perceived quality of life (QoL) in the elderly remains undefined. METHODS: Retrospective analysis was conducted on 866 patients 65 years of age and over who underwent AVR between October 1976 and December 1999 with a Carpentier-Edwards porcine bioprosthesis. This cohort was divided between those who underwent isolated AVR (n=438) and those with AVR and concomitant CABG (AVR+CABG; n=428). Mean age was 77.0+/-6.1 years (range, 65 to 91) in the AVR group and 78.2+/-5.5 years (range, 65 to 93) in the AVR+CABG group. QoL was assessed with the Short Form-36 health survey for survivors at follow-up, which was 97% complete. RESULTS: Operative mortality (OM) was 6.2% (27/438) for the AVR group and 8.9% (38/428) for the AVR+CABG group (P=0.130). The occurrence of hospital complications (P=0.162) and postoperative length of stay (P=0.980) was similar for the 2 groups. Actuarial survival at 10 years was 37.1+/-3.4% for AVR and 38.7+/-4% for AVR+CABG patients (P=0.088). On multivariate analyses, CABG was not a predictor of either OM or long-term survival. QoL was similar for the 2 groups on the summary components: physical health (39.4+/-11.4 versus 40.2+/-12.1; P=0.461) and mental health (50.2+/-10.8 versus 51.9+/-10.1; P=0.103). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the presence of severe coronary artery disease, CABG preserved the long-term QoL in elderly patients undergoing AVR.     

Preservation of the Endothelium in Cardiovascular Surgery – Some Practical Suggestions – A review

Objective: Critical aortic stenosis with or without coronary artery disease is increasingly common in octogenarians. Surgery is the treatment of choice, but indications and results of aortic valve replacement (AVR), particularly when combined with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) are debated. We investigated whether the combined procedure of AVR and CABG increased postoperative risk compared with isolated AVR in otherwise healthy octogenarians. Design: In the period 1994-1998, AVR was performed in 94 patients above 80 years, the majority in NYHA class III and IV. Combined AVR and CABG was performed in 52/94 patients. The patients were studied retrospectively by collecting data from hospital records and followed for 0-7 years. Results: Mean age was 82 &;#45 2.3 years, sex (male/female) 33/61, left ventricular ejection fraction 70 &;#45 18%, transvalvular peak pressure gradient 63 &;#45 20 mmHg and aortic valve area 0.5 &;#45 0.2 cm 2 . Early mortality (< 30 days) was 4/42 (9.5%) after AVR and 4/52 (7.6%) after AVR and CABG ( p = NS between groups). Three-year survival was 33/42 (78.5%) after AVR and 42/52 (80.7%) after AVR and CABG ( p = NS between groups). Conclusion: AVR with concomitant CABG in octogenarians with aortic stenosis who are otherwise healthy, may be performed without increased risk.     

Inotropes improve right heart function in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis

The administration of inotropes after aortic valve replacement (AVR) for aortic stenosis (AS) is controversial. Issues include the risk of left ventricular (LV) systolic outflow obstruction (LVOTO) and the proper treatment of diastolic dysfunction for patients in whom LV systolic function is often preserved and subsequently improved. In this study, we assessed the hemodynamic benefits of inotropes for patients undergoing AVR for AS. Thirty-four patients were prospectively randomized to one of three groups: epinephrine, milrinone, or placebo. Hemodynamic and echocardiographic data were obtained before and immediately after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Data were also obtained before and after increases in ventricular preload to assess the effects of inotropes on diastolic function. The use of inotropes was associated with significantly larger increases in right ventricular (RV) (placebo, 0.5%; epinephrine, +9%; milrinone, +8%; P < 0.01) and LV (placebo, +7%; epinephrine, +18%; milrinone, +20%; P = 0.07) ejection fractions (EF) and cardiac output after CPB. Changes in cardiac output and index were more strongly correlated with changes in RVEF (r = 0.56, P < 0.01; r = 0.47, P < 0.01, respectively) than with LVEF (r = 0.22, r = 0.08). Of all patients receiving epinephrine or milrinone, only one (1 of 22) had a decrease in RVEF, whereas 6 of 12 patients receiving placebo had a reduction in RVEF from pre-CPB to post-CPB. Correspondingly, for LVEF, 1 of 22 patients receiving inotropes had a decrease in LVEF, whereas 3 of 12 placebo patients had a reduction in LVEF from pre-CPB to post-CPB. No patient had evidence of LVOTO. Inotropes improved hemodynamics after AVR for AS. This was attributable more to improved RV function than to changes in LV function. Although there were no changes in diastolic function, it is possible that this study did not allow significant timing to observe benefits of inotropes on diastolic function in this setting. IMPLICATIONS: Compared with placebo, both epinephrine and milrinone similarly improved biventricular performance after aortic valve replacement, with a greater impact on right ventricular function. Choice of either inotropic drug should be driven by blood pressure and hemodynamic goals in this setting.     

Aortic valve replacement for aortic regurgitation and stenosis, in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction.

OBJECTIVE: Aortic valve replacement for aortic valve stenosis (AS) and regurgitation (AR) in patients with severe left ventricular (LV) dysfunction contains an increased risk. Few data are available on the outcome of such patients. METHODS: Fifty-five consecutive patients with severe LV dysfunction (ejection fraction, EF; <30%) and aortic valve replacement for AS (n=35) or AR (n=20) were investigated between 1994 and 2001. EF was 25+/-5%, mean transvalvular gradient 26+/-6mmHg (AS), aortic valve area 0.66+/-0.18cm(2) (AS), cardiac index (CI) 2.4+/-0.9l/min/m(2), enddiastolic LV diameter (LVEDD) 64+/-8mm and endsystolic LV diameters (LVESD) was 55+/-3mm. Ninety percent of patients were in New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class III/IV at admission to the hospital. Concomitant coronary artery bypass grafts (CABG) were performed in 14 patients. Follow-up examinations including chest X-ray, echocardiography, exercise testing, were performed among survivors. RESULTS: The survival rates for AS were: 1-year 76%, 2-year 68.8%, 5-year 64.2%; for AR: 1-year 94.4%, 2-year 86.5%, 5-year 74.2%. NYHA functional class improved from 90% in class III/IV to 45 (AR group) and 24% (AS group) at follow-up (P<0.02). The LVEDD decreased to 54+/-8mm after 1 year. The EF improved to 38+/-4 (AR group) and 40+/-5% (AS group) at follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Despite severe LV dysfunction, increased 1-year mortality especially in the AS group, aortic valve replacement was associated with improved functional status, symptoms and EF in both groups and in most patients. We, therefore, conclude that aortic valve replacement in patients with severe LV dysfunction can be performed with acceptable risk.     

Clinical outcome of aortic valve replacement in the elderly

Since elderly patients are being referred for surgery in increasing numbers, we reviewed the clinical outcome of 459 consecutive patients aged 70 to 89 years, who had aortic valve replacement between 1993 and 2000. We subdivided the study population into three groups: in Group 1 we included patients aged 70-74 years old; in Group 2 patients aged 75-79 years old; and in Group 3 patients aged 80 years old or older. An isolated AVR was performed in 289 patients (63%), concomitant coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) in 168 patients (36.6%), an isolated ventricular septal defect (VSD) closure in one patient (0.2%) and an isolated atrial septal defect (ASD) closure in one patient (0.2%). The overall perioperative mortality rate was 7% (32 patients), without significant differences among the three groups (P=0.88). Our study confirms the good outcome of aortic valve replacement in elderly patients even in octagenarians and only concomitant CABG procedures increase the operative risk, reducing long-term survival (P<0.05).     

Levitronix CentriMag pump as perioperative left ventricular support in a patient with critical aortic stenosis, mitral regurgitation, and cardiogenic shock

Severe aortic stenosis (AS) has a poor prognosis when associated with left ventricular dysfunction and congestive heart failure. Despite a relatively high operative mortality, most patients with severe AS and a depressed left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) should be considered candidates for aortic valve replacement. The CentriMag left ventricular assist system (Levitronix) can be used for perioperative or postcardiotomy circulatory support for the failing heart. In this case report, we report the successful use of the Levitronix CentriMag device as perioperative support in a high-risk patient with severe AS, significant mitral insufficiency, and a poor LVEF with advanced organ failure.     

Different characteristics of postoperative heart failure after surgery for aortic stenosis and coronary disease

OBJECTIVE: Postoperative heart failure (PHF) remains a major determinant of outcome after cardiac surgery. However, possible differences in characteristics of PHF after valve surgery and coronary surgery (CABG) have received little attention. Therefore, this issue was studied in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement (AVR) and CABG, respectively. DESIGN: Three hundred and ninety-eight patients undergoing isolated AVR for aortic stenosis were compared with 398 patients, matched for age and sex, undergoing on-pump isolated CABG. Forty-five AVR and 47 CABG patients required treatment for PHF and these were studied in detail. RESULTS: The AVR group had longer aortic cross-clamp time and higher rate of isolated right ventricular heart failure postoperatively. Myocardial ischemia during induction and perioperative myocardial infarction were more common in the CABG group. One-year mortality was 8.9% in the AVR group vs 25.5% in the CABG group (p = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of PHF was similar in both groups but different characteristics were found. Isolated right ventricular failure and PHF precipitated by septicemia were more common in AVR patients. PHF was more clearly associated with myocardial ischemia and infarction in CABG patients, which could explain their less favorable survival.     

Impact of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch on intermediate-term outcome and regression of left ventricular mass following aortic valve replacement with mechanical prosthesis

BACKGROUND: The impact of aortic valve replacement (AVR) with prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM) on intermediate-term outcome and left ventricular mass (LVM) regression in patients with aortic stenosis (AS) was investigated. METHODS: One hundred fifty patients with AS (87 pure stenosis and 63 combined stenosis and regurgitation) were classified into a PPM group (n = 34, indexed effective orifice area (EOAI) >0.65 cm(2)/m(2) and < or =0.85 cm(2)/m(2); moderate PPM) and a non-PPM group (n = 116, EOAI > 0.85). Mean age, mean and peak aortic pressure gradient (PG) were not different between the groups (PPM, 99.7 +/- 37.2 and 54.9 +/- 23.2 mmHg; non-PPM, 95.9 +/- 29.2 and 54.4 +/- 16.0 mmHg). The absolute and relative regression in indexed left ventricular mass (LVMI) was estimated by preoperative and postoperative echocardiography (n = 98). RESULTS: Twelve patients died (valve-related death in 7) during 5 years of follow-up. Comparing the PPM and non-PPM groups, overall survival (78.7% vs. 87.8%) and survival free from valve-related death (96.8% vs. 92.1%) were not significantly different. New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class improved in all patients and there were no patients in class III or IV. The postoperative mean PG was 14.6 +/- 6.1 mmHg in the PPM group and 9.4 +/- 3.8 mmHg in the non-PPM group (p = 0.0005), with an inverse correlation (r = -0.48, p < 0.0001) between EOAI and the postoperative mean PG. However, there was no significant difference in the absolute and relative LVMI regression between the two groups. Multiple linear regression analysis was performed and higher preoperative LVMI and mean aortic PG were independent predictors of greater LVMI regression after AVR. CONCLUSIONS: Moderate PPM does not appear to alter LVMI regression, NYHA class, or intermediate-term outcome in AS patients undergoing AVR with mechanical prostheses. In multivariate analysis, preoperative LVMI and mean aortic PG were important independent predictors of LVMI regression.     

Aortic valve-sparing operations in patients with aneurysms of the aortic root or ascending aorta

BACKGROUND: Aortic valve-sparing operations are an alternative to aortic root replacement in patients with aortic root aneurysms, or aortic valve replacement and supracoronary replacement of the ascending aorta in patients with ascending aorta aneurysms and dilated sinotubular junctions with consequent aortic insufficiency. METHODS: From 1988 to 2001, 230 patients underwent aortic valve-sparing operations for aortic root aneurysms (151 patients) or ascending aortic aneurysms with aortic insufficiency (79 patients). Two types of aortic valve-sparing operations were performed in patients with aortic root aneurysms: reimplantation of the aortic valve and remodeling of the aortic root. Mean follow-up was 3.8 +/- 2.8 years. RESULTS: Patients with aortic root aneurysms were younger, had less severe aortic insufficiency, less extensive vascular disease, and better left ventricular function than patients with ascending aorta aneurysms. The 8-year survival was 83% +/- 5% for the first group and 36% +/- 14% for the second. The freedom from aortic valve reoperation at 8 years was 99% +/- 1% for the first group and 97% +/- 2% for the second. In patients who had aortic root aneurysms, 3 developed severe aortic insufficiency (AI), and 15 developed moderate AI, for an 8-year freedom from significant AI of 67% +/- 7%. But freedom from AI was 90% +/- 3% after the technique of reimplantation, and 55% +/- 6% after the technique of remodeling (p = 0.02). In patients with ascending aortic aneurysms, the freedom from AI greater than 2+ at 8 years was 67% +/- 11%. CONCLUSIONS: The long-term results of aortic valve sparing for aortic root aneurysms are excellent, and reimplantation of the aortic valve may provide a more stable repair of the aortic valve than remodeling of the aortic root.     

Open heart surgery in the elderly

Of 3254 open heart surgical cases performed since 1972, 126 patients (3.9%) were 70 years of age or older. The mean age was 72 years, the oldest being 82. Sixty-seven per cent were male. The following procedures were performed: coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) 51, aortic valve replacement (AVR) 44, AVR + CABG 16, mitral valve replacement (MVR) 3, MVR + CABG 6, MVR + AVR 4, and other, 2. Of those undergoing CABG, 33% came from the Coronary Care Unit and 24% had left main coronary artery stenosis. There was one peri-operative death (2.0%). Of those undergoing AVR, 43% had coronary artery disease and 13% triple vessel disease. Operative mortality for AVR, and AVR + CABG was 11.4% (5/44) and 18.8% (3/16), respectively. Twenty-six per cent of operative survivors had significant postoperative complications (excluding atrial arrhythmias). The postoperative hospital stay for CABG, AVR and other cases was 11, 13 and 16 days, respectively. Seven year survival of all patients was 61.2 +/- 6.5% (+/- 1 SE) and for AVR +/- CABG was 51.5 +/- 8.6%. Five year survival for CABG was 83.9 +/- 6.3%. We conclude that, in selected cases, CABG can be performed safely in the elderly. Although valvular and combined surgery may result in significant morbidity and mortality, the satisfactory long term results in survivors justifies surgery in this group of patients.     

Management of mild aortic stenosis during coronary artery bypass surgery: an update, 1992-2001

BACKGROUND: "Prophylactic" aortic valve replacement (AVR) in patients with asymptomatic, mild-to-moderate aortic stenosis (AS) at the time of CABG is controversial. In 1994, we reported our initial experience involving 44 patients and have now updated our series in an attempt to further evaluate outcomes. METHODS: Between January 1992 and July 2001, 100 consecutive patients underwent reoperative AVR following previous CABG. Forty patients had their initial surgery at the Brigham & Women's Hospital (BWH) and 60 patients had their coronary surgery elsewhere. None of the 40 BWH patients had a mean valve gradient greater than 25 mmHg at the time of CABG. RESULTS: The mean time interval from CABG to AVR for the entire group was 9.0 years (range: 1.4-21 years). Overall operative mortality (OM) was 7% including 5 deaths (10.2%) among 49 patients requiring additional CABG at the time of AVR and 2 deaths (3.9%) among 51 patients without additional coronary artery intervention. This OM rate was a notable decrease from our earlier report of 18.2% (P = 0.07). Furthermore, operative mortality decreased progressively from 15.4% in 1992-1993 to 0% in 2000-2001 (P = NS). CONCLUSION: The OM of reoperative AVR following CABG has fallen in recent years. Given the relevance of newer techniques and approaches, it may be reasonable to adopt an expectant management approach in patients with asymptomatic mild-to-moderate AS (i.e., mean systolic gradient less than 25 mmHg) at the time of CABG.