Bedside chest radiography: diagnostic efficacy

In order to evaluate the efficacy of bedside chest radiography, a prospective study was completed of 140 patients admitted to the surgical and medical intensive care units over a two-month period. A total of 1132 consecutive bedside radiographs was analyzed for malposition of tubes and lines and interval changes in the cardiopulmonary findings. The median number of bedside radiographs per patient was 0.7 per day. Endotracheal or tracheostomy tubes were present in 54% of all examinations; among these 12% were malpositioned. Central venous catheters were present in 47%; among these 9% were malpositioned. Interval changes regarding cardiopulmonary findings (pneumothorax, collapse, diffuse or focal infiltrate, effusion, and congestive heart failure) were present in 44% of the radiographs after the admission one. Overall there were new findings or changes affecting the patient's management present in 65% of the radiographs. The use of bedside radiography appeared to be appropriate.     

Bedside chest radiography and optimization of radiographic conditions in the NICU with the Fuji Computed Radiography System

We devised an application that uses the "Maximum value reading method (AutoIV)" for bedside chest radiography in a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) that used the Fuji Computed Radiography (FCR) System. The application, named AutoIV-N, uses the relationship for density correction between radiographic conditions (mAs) and the Display Parameter (GS). GS=f (mAs) can be considered the relationship that connects FCR and the X-ray generator. When AutoIV-N is used, radiographic image contrast does not change. Further, radiographic image density fluctuation can be eliminated by random elements such as X-ray output fluctuation of the X-ray generator and the decline of photo-stimulated luminescence caused by fading of the imaging plate. Accordingly, image recording that is suitable for follow-up chest radiography is made possible. We choose nine patients and performed a comparison of radiographic density fluctuation in AutoIV-N and Fix. AutoIV-N was found to be more stable than Fix. It is possible to use the radiographic imaging condition that is optimized for all patients in the NICU by AutoIV-N. This facilitates radiation exposure optimization in medicine. (Article in Japanese).     

Temporal subtraction chest radiography

Radiologist are commonly required to compare a sequence of two or more chest radiographs of a given patient obtained over a period of time, which may range from a few hours to many years. In such cases, the task is one of detecting interval change. In the case of patients who have had a previous chest radiograph, an opportunity exists to enhance selectively areas of interval change, including regions with new or altered pathology, by using the previous radiographs as a subtraction mask. With temporal subtraction, the previous image is superimposed and registered with the current image, using automated two-dimensional warping to compensate for any differences in positioning. A “difference image” is then created, by subtracting the previous from the current radiograph. In this temporal subtraction image, areas that are unchanged appear as uniform gray, while regions of new opacity, such as due to pneumonia or cancer, appear as prominent dark foci on a lighter background. By cancelling out the complex anatomical background, temporal subtraction can provide dramatically enhanced visibility of new areas of disease.     

Recent advances in chest radiography

There have been many remarkable advances in conventional thoracic imaging over the past decade. Perhaps the most remarkable is the rapid conversion from film-based to digital radiographic systems. Computed radiography is now the preferred imaging modality for bedside chest imaging. Direct radiography is rapidly replacing film-based chest units for in-department posteroanterior and lateral examinations. An exciting aspect of the conversion to digital radiography is the ability to enhance the diagnostic capabilities and influence of chest radiography. Opportunities for direct computer-aided detection of various lesions may enhance the radiologist's accuracy and improve efficiency. Newer techniques such as dual-energy and temporal subtraction radiography show promise for improved detection of subtle and often obscured or overlooked lung lesions. Digital tomosynthesis is a particularly promising technique that allows reconstruction of multisection images from a short acquisition at very low patient dose. Preliminary data suggest that, compared with conventional radiography, tomosynthesis may also improve detection of subtle lung lesions. The ultimate influence of these new technologies will, of course, depend on the outcome of rigorous scientific validation.     

Measuring performance in chest radiography

PURPOSE: To use a standardized set of chest radiographs to quantify interobserver differences and to provide a basis for comparing the diagnostic performance of physicians. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A standardized set of 60 chest radiographs was presented to 162 study participants. Each participant reviewed the radiographs and recorded his or her diagnostic impression by using a fixed five-point scale. These response data were used to generate receiver operating characteristic curves and to establish performance benchmarks. The variations in performance were tested for statistical significance. RESULTS: Significant interobserver variability was identified during these assessments. The composite group of board-certified radiologists demonstrated performance superior to that of the radiology residents and nonradiologist physicians. CONCLUSION: By using a receiver operating characteristic approach and a standardized set of chest radiographs, observer accuracy and variability are easily quantified. This approach provides a basis for comparing the diagnostic performance of physicians. When value is measured as a diminution in uncertainty, board-certified radiologists contribute substantial value to the diagnostic imaging system.     

Digital radiography of the chest

Digital radiography is an appropriate method for both bedside and in-department chest radiographs. Its major advantage in bedside chest radiography is its control of the displayed optical density of these radiographs. With dynamic range control processing, it improves the visibility of tubes and lines superimposed on the mediastinal tissues. When used for in-department chest radiography, it may offer slight advantages in the evaluation of disease in the mediastinum, but in general is equivalent to film-screen chest radiography. The main reasons for using digital chest radiography for in-department chest radiographs relate mainly to its use as a data entry point method of projection radiography for high-quality teleradiology or for its use in a picture archiving and communication system. Apart from these advantages, there is no reason to change from conventional to digital chest radiographs. Digital radiographs are, with certain systems, printed at smaller than life size. Because of this, there is a necessary period of learning as radiologists adjust to the new image size. The most important change in radiologists' work pattern appears to be the need to sit closer to the film. Findings of disease are smaller, but, with experience, just as easy to see.     

Detection accuracy in chest radiography.

The detection accuracy of the diagnostic radiologist is important in everyday medical decision making. However, little work has been done relating the detection accuracy of the radiologist to the quality of the image. This study, using a thorax and lung phantom, simulated tissue-equivalent 6.4 mm lesions, and a 183 cm source-to-image distance, shows that the detection accuracy is not dependent on the focal spot size (over a range of 0.3-2.0 mm). However, the false positive rate increases when using small focal spots. In addition, the detection accuracy decreases with increasing root-mean-square (RMS) noise (a measure of the amount of quantum mottle in the image), while the false positive rate and intraobserver disagreement increase with increasing RMS noise. It is also shown that the nonradiologist responds to changes in noise in exactly the same way as the radiologist.     

Heart size in high-kilovoltage chest radiography

High-kilovoltage (kV) radiography of the chest using an air gap results in magnification of the heart and thorax despite the use of a longer focus-to-film distance. One hundred patients had their recent high-kV chest radiograph compared with their previous low-kV film. There was a significant increase in all cardiac parameters. Geometric distortion of the cardiac shadow also occurred, resulting in magnification and elongation preferentially affecting the left side of the heart. We believe this causes an additional subjective impression of a large heart. Radiologists and clinicians should revalue their assessment of cardiac size when such a technique is used.     

Computer-aided diagnosis in chest radiography.

We have developed computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) schemes for the detection of lung nodules, interstitial lung diseases, interval changes, and asymmetric opacities, and also for the differential diagnosis of lung nodules and interstitial lung diseases on chest radiographs. Observer performance studies indicate clearly that radiologists' diagnostic accuracy was improved significantly when radiologists used a computer output in their interpretations of chest radiographs. In addition, the automated recognition methods for the patient and the projection view by use of chest radiographs were useful for integrating the chest CAD schemes into the picture-archiving and communication system (PACS).     

Digital projection radiography of the chest

Direct and film-based radiographic systems are undergoing evaluation by observer performance studies for use in digital imaging of the chest. Many issues intrinsic to digital imaging are not settled, including the minimal pixel size necessary for images of accurate diagnostic quality, the characteristics of the display console, and the usefulness of digital imaging processing techniques. The chest is a particularly difficult anatomic region for examination by digital radiography because of the broad spectrum of disease findings encountered. These issues are discussed in reference to four reports that use observer performance tests for evaluating various facets of chest diagnosis using digital radiography.     

Chest radiography after minor chest trauma

The results of chest radiography in 581 patients with blunt minor thoracic trauma were reviewed. Frontal and lateral views of the chest indicated pathology in 72 patients (12.4%). Pneumothorax was present in 16 patients; 4 had hemothorax. The physical examination and the results of chest radiography were not in accordance because in 6 (30%) of the 20 patients with hemo/pneumothorax the physical examination was normal. Consequently there is wide indication for chest radiography after minor blunt chest trauma.