Cross-reactivity of pollen allergens: recommendations for immunotherapy vaccines

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review will summarize recent research on pollen allergen and epitope cross-reactivity. Knowledge of these relationships aids in the rational formulation of allergen immunotherapy vaccines. RECENT FINDINGS: There has been further clarification of panallergens and their roles as both major and minor allergens. Recent studies have targeted non-specific lipid transfer proteins and calcium-binding proteins (polcalcins), as well as pathogenesis-related protein families and profilins. Polcalcins and non-specific lipid transfer proteins are responsible for pollen-fruit interactions as well as pollen cross-reactivity, in some cases, but not all, accounting for major allergenicity. Delineation of the enzymatic activity of certain allergens explains the ubiquitous nature of these pollen proteins. SUMMARY: Characterization of specific pollen allergens and their protein families has provided insight into the grounds for cross-reactivity. Continuing clarification of these relationships will allow the substitution and consolidation of inhalant extracts as described in the conclusion.     

Patterns of pollen cross-allergenicity

Knowledge of patterns of pollen cross-reactivity is crucial for diagnostics and especially for formulation of immunotherapy vaccines in times of diminishing availability of pollen extract constituents. As phylogenetic relationships have become better clarified, it becomes apparent that cross-reactivity does reflect taxonomy in the very great majority of cases. Contradictory observations of unexpected cross-reactivity between unrelated plants, sometimes remarkably distant ones, require explanation. There are many proteins, presumably performing vital functions, that are tightly preserved throughout the evolutionary tree from plants to animals, such as profilins, lipid transfer proteins, and pathogenesis-related proteins. These might function as panallergens. The small differences that exist between these ubiquitous proteins explain why these are frequently minor allergens not reacting in the majority of allergic sera. This review summarizes cross-reactivity studies with both crude pollen extracts and purified or recombinant allergenic proteins. The patterns of cross-allergenicity that emerge should be helpful in guiding both diagnostic and therapeutic decisions.     

Pollen allergens are restricted to few protein families and show distinct patterns of species distribution

BACKGROUND: Inhalative allergies are elicited predominantly by pollen of various plant species. However, a classification of the large number of identified pollen allergens is still missing. OBJECTIVE: To analyze pollen allergen sequences with respect to protein family membership, taxonomic distribution of protein families, and interspecies variability. METHODS: Protein family memberships of all plant allergen sequences from the Allergome database were determined by using the Protein Families Database of Alignments and Hidden Markov Models. The taxonomic distribution of pollen allergens was established from the Integrated Taxonomic Information System. Members of abundant pollen allergen families were compared with allergenic and nonallergenic homologues by database similarity searches and multiple sequence alignments. RESULTS: Pollen allergens were classified into 29 of 7868 protein families. Expansins, profilins, and calcium-binding proteins constitute the major pollen allergen families, whereas most plant food allergens belong to the prolamin, cupin, or profilin families. Pollen allergens were revealed to be ubiquitous (eg, profilins), present in certain plant families (eg, pectate lyases), or limited to a single taxon (eg, thaumatin-like proteins). Allergenic plant profilins constitute a highly conserved family with sequence identities of 70% to 85% among each other but low identities of 30% to 40% with nonallergenic profilins from other eukaryotes, including human beings. Similarly, allergenic polcalcins possess sequence identities of 64% to 92% but show low identities of 39% to 42% to related nonallergenic calmodulins and calmodulin-like proteins from vegetative plant tissues and man. CONCLUSION: This classification of pollen allergens into protein families will aid in predicting cross-reactivity, designing comprehensive diagnostic devices, and assessing the allergenic potential of novel proteins.     

Type I allergy to elderberry (Sambucus nigra) is elicited by a 33.2 kDa allergen with significant homology to ribosomal inactivating proteins

BACKGROUND: Patients suffering from allergic rhinoconjunctivitis and dyspnoea during summer may exhibit these symptoms after contact with flowers or dietary products of the elderberry tree Sambucus nigra. OBJECTIVE: Patients with a history of summer hayfever were tested in a routine setting for sensitization to elderberry. Nine patients having allergic symptoms due to elderberry and specific sensitization were investigated in detail. We studied the responsible allergens in extracts from elderberry pollen, flowers and berries, and investigated cross-reactivity with allergens from birch, grass and mugwort. METHODS: Sera from patients were tested for IgE reactivity to elderberry proteins by one-dimensional (1D) and 2D electrophoresis/immunoblotting. Inhibition studies with defined allergens and elderberry-specific antibodies were used to evaluate cross-reactivity. The main elderberry allergen was purified by gel filtration and reversed-phase HPLC, and subjected to mass spectrometry. The in-gel-digested allergen was analysed by the MS/MS sequence analysis and peptide mapping. The N-terminal sequence of the predominant allergen was analysed. RESULTS: 0.6% of 3668 randomly tested patients showed positive skin prick test and/or RAST to elderberry. IgE in patients' sera detected a predominant allergen of 33.2 kDa in extracts from elderberry pollen, flowers and berries, with an isoelectric point at pH 7.0. Pre-incubation of sera with extracts from birch, mugwort or grass pollen rendered insignificant or no inhibition of IgE binding to blotted elderberry proteins. Specific mouse antisera reacted exclusively with proteins from elderberry. N-terminal sequence analysis, as well as MS/MS spectrometry of the purified elderberry allergen, indicated homology with ribosomal inactivating proteins (RIPs). CONCLUSION: We present evidence that the elderberry plant S. nigra harbours allergenic potency. Independent methodologies argue for a significant homology of the predominant 33.2 kDa elderberry allergen with homology to RIPs. We conclude that this protein is a candidate for a major elderberry allergen with designation Sam n 1.     

Structural relatedness of plant food allergens with specific reference to cross-reactive allergens: an in silico analysis

BACKGROUND: The body of sequence and structural information on allergens and the sequence analysis of whole plant genomes are facilitating the application of bioinformatic approaches to identifying and defining plant allergens. OBJECTIVE: An in silico approach was used to quantify the distribution of plant food allergen sequences across protein families and to develop and apply a novel means of assessing conserved surface features important for IgE cross-reactivity. METHODS: Plant food allergen sequences were classified into Pfam families on the basis of sequence homology. Contact surface areas of selected proteins were calculated with MOLMOL by using a 1.4-A probe, corrected by removing contributions from IgE inaccessible main chains and side chains forming the ligand binding sites. RESULTS: A set of 129 food allergen sequences were classified into only 20 of 3849 possible Pfam families, with 4 families accounting for more than 65% of food allergens. Structural bioinformatic analysis of conserved exterior main chains and amino acid side chains in cross-reactive homologues of Bet v 1 and nonspecific lipid transfer proteins showed higher levels of similarity than shown by simple sequence comparisons. Thus, 75% of the Mal d 1 surface is likely to bind anti-Bet v 1 antibodies, compared with a sequence identity of approximately 56%. CONCLUSION: Most plant food allergens belong to only 4 structural families, indicating that conserved structures and biological activities may play a role in determining or promoting allergenic properties. Structural bioinformatic analysis shows that conservation of 3-dimensional structure should be included in any assessment of potential IgE cross-reactivity in, for example, novel proteins.     

Molecular cloning and characterization of hazel pollen protein (70 kD) as a luminal binding protein (BiP): a novel cross-reactive plant allergen

BACKGROUND: Tree pollen contains many allergens showing cross-reactivity to proteins from pollen, seeds, and fruits of different plant species. Amongst Fagales, responsible for several allergenic responses, hazel provides the best material to study pollen as well as food allergens in one species. The aim of this study was to identify and characterize the physiological function of an allergen from hazel pollen and to determine possible cross-reactivity to proteins from hazelnut. METHODS: Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) against hazel pollen crude extract were produced. On the basis of IgE binding, demonstrated by sera from patients allergic to hazel pollen, one mAb indicating the best correlation has been selected, and the putative allergen was purified by preparative gel electrophoresis. Isoforms were investigated by two-dimensional PAGE, and for molecular identification a hazel pollen cDNA library was constructed. In situ localization of the allergen during pollen development was performed by immunofluorescence labelling. RESULTS: Immunological staining of crude hazel pollen extract with specific IgE and mAb revealed a 70-kD protein. Immunoblot studies with mAb showed cross-reactive proteins of 70-72 kD in different plant tissues and species. After protein purification, the IgE-binding reactivity of the allergen has been reconfirmed, and two isoforms were detected. Molecular cloning identified the allergen as a luminal binding protein (BiP) of the Hsp70 family with 88-92% sequence identity in various plants. Further immunocytological studies indicated involvement of BiP during pollen development. CONCLUSIONS: Chaperons like BiP play an important role in protein synthesis and in the protection of cellular structures during stress-related processes. Because of their highly conserved protein sequences, we propose that such allergens could be responsible for at least a part of the allergenic cross-reactivity between proteins from different pollens and plant foods.     

Allergens in pepper and paprika

Mugwort and birch pollen allergy are frequently associated with IgEmediated hypersensitivity to celery and spices. We analyzed 22 sera from patients with the mugwort-birch-celery-spice syndrome for IgE binding to the spices pepper and paprika by immunoblotting. Immunoblot results revealed two major allergens of 28 and 60 kDa in pepper and a 23-kDa allergen together with allergens of higher molecular weight in paprika. In immunoblot-inhibition studies, crude mugwort, birch pollen, and celery extracts significantly reduced the IgE binding to pepper and paprika allergens. However, no inhibition was achieved with rBet v 1 and rBet v 2, suggesting that no homologs of these birch proteins act as allergens in pepper or paprika extracts, N-terminal sequence analysis of the 14- and 28-kDa pepper and 23-kDa paprika allergens revealed no homology to known allergens. The 28-kDa pepper allergen showed homology to a wheat germin protein, and the 23-kDa paprika allergen was identified as a homolog of a osmotin-like or pathogenesis-related protein in tomato. Therefore, we conclude that the IgE cross-reactivity in the mugwort-birch-celery-spice syndrome to the spices pepper and paprika is not caused by homologs of Bet v 1 and profilin, N-terminal amino acid sequence analysis of the main allergens in pepper and paprika indicate a relation to frequently occurring plant proteins.     

The major allergen of olive pollen Ole e 1 is a diagnostic marker for sensitization to Oleaceae

BACKGROUND: Trees of the family Oleaceae are important allergen sources, with a strongly varying geographic distribution. For example, olive pollen is an important allergen source in Mediterranean countries, whereas ash pollen dominates in Northern and Central Europe and North America. The aim of this study was to compare the profiles of olive and ash pollen allergens and to study the degree of cross-reactivity using populations of allergic patients selectively exposed to olive or ash pollen. METHODS: Olive and ash pollen extracts were analyzed by IgE immunoblotting using sera from Spanish patients highly exposed to olive pollen and Austrian patients without olive but ash pollen exposure. IgE cross-reactivity was studied by qualitative immunoblot inhibition assays and semiquantitative ELISA inhibitions using olive, ash, birch, mugwort, timothy grass pollen extracts and the major olive pollen allergen, Ole e 1. RESULTS: Spanish and Austrian patients exhibited an almost identical IgE-binding profile to olive and ash pollen allergens, with major reactivity directed against Ole e 1, and its homologous ash counterpart, Fra e 1. IgE inhibition experiments demonstrated extensive cross-reactivity between olive and ash pollen allergens. However, whereas cross-reactions between profilins and calcium-binding allergens also occurred between unrelated plant species, cross-reactivity to Ole e 1 was confined to plants belonging to the Oleaceae. CONCLUSIONS: Ole e 1 is a marker allergen for the diagnosis of olive and ash pollen allergy.     

Detection of allergens in plantain (Plantago lanceolata) pollen

BACKGROUND: Allergens in Plantago lanceolata have not been characterized yet. The objective was to characterize some plantain-pollen allergens and to investigate the cross-reactivity between plantain and grass pollens. METHODS: Sera from four patients monosensitive to plantain pollen and from eight grass-pollen-allergic patients showing strong skin reactivity to plantain pollen in the skin prick test (SPT) underwent immunoblot analysis with both Plantago and grass mix extract. Moreover, immunoblot inhibition experiments were done with grass mix extract as inhibitor. RESULTS: All four sera from plantain-allergic patients reacted to two distinct bands at 17 and 19 kDa, and 2/4 sera showed further reactivity to a 40-kDa protein, which in one case represented the most prominent IgE-binding allergen. Plantain-monosensitive subjects did not show any reactivity to grass-pollen extract, and preabsorption of their sera with grass-pollen extract did not cause any loss of reactivity to plantain pollen. Sera from all eight grass-pollen-allergic controls reacted to a 30-kDa protein in plantain pollen, and some sera showed cross-reactivity to higher and lower molecular-weight structures as well. In all cases, plantain reactivity was totally abolished by preabsorption of sera with grass-pollen extract. A preliminary investigation by immunoblot showed that polyclonal IgG anti-Phl p 5 (but not polyclonal Phl p 1) from rabbit reacted to a 30-kDa protein in plantain pollen. CONCLUSIONS: Three specific allergens (of 17, 19, and 40 kDa, respectively) have been detected in plantain pollen. Further studies on a larger number of patients will determine whether these proteins may be considered major allergens. Cross-reactivity between grass and plantain pollen is mainly caused by a 30-kDa protein in plantain pollen. Group 5 grass-pollen allergen is probably responsible for most grass/plantain cross-reactivity.     

Evolution in the understanding of cross-reactivities of respiratory allergens: the role of recombinant allergens

The aim of this review is to show the impact of the use of purified and recombinant allergens to discriminate between co- and cross-sensitization to respiratory allergens. The author describes the evolution of diagnostic tests over the last decades; the tests initially allowed the detection of simultaneously positive cutaneous tests and/or simultaneous positivity of specific IgE to different allergen extracts, but they did not differentiate cross-sensitization from co-sensitization. RAST inhibition studies with crude extracts then established cross-reactivity, but did not identify the cross-reactive allergens involved. Later, immunoblot and CRIE inhibition were able to detect multiple cross-reactive allergens and to assess their physicochemical properties. But it is only since purified and recombinant allergens have been used in the different investigations that identification of cross-reactive allergens has been made possible at a molecular level. This historical approach is illustrated by examples selected from some of the main respiratory allergen sources: tree pollen, grass pollen, weed pollen, acarids, cockroaches and mammalians. For each of these allergen sources, the author gives an updated presentation of major and minor cross-reactive allergen molecules and refers to the last decade's major publications concerning immunochemical investigations carried out in the field of cross-reactive respiratory allergens. Emphasis is placed on the clinical applications for allergic patients: improvement in the accuracy of the diagnosis of sensitization, new concepts of immunotherapy based on genetically engineered hypoallergenic variants of cross-reactive allergens used alone or in combination, evaluation of allergen load with environmental tests using monoclonal antibodies against cross-reactive allergens.     

Evaluation of cross-reactivity between Holoptelea integrifolia and Parietaria judaica

BACKGROUND: Holoptelea integrifolia and Parietaria judaica belong to the family Urticaceae, but are geographically distantly located. H. integrifolia is an important pollen allergen of India and sensitizes almost 10% of the atopic population in Delhi. P. judaica, on the other hand, is a very dominant pollen allergen of the Mediterranean region, sensitizing almost 80% of the allergic population. Since both these important pollen allergens belong to the family Urticaceae, the objective of the present study was to assess cross-reactivity between these two pollen allergens from different geographical regions. METHODS: Cross-reactivity between these two pollen allergens was assessed on the basis of skin prick tests and ELISA, ELISA inhibition and immunoblot inhibition studies. RESULTS: Out of 44 atopic Indian patients skin prick tested with H. integrifolia extract, 34% were found to be sensitized. All the patients sensitized to H. integrifolia also showed varying degrees of skin positivity to P. judaica pollen extract. ELISA and ELISA inhibition studies suggested strong cross-reactivity between H. integrifolia and P. judaica pollen. Immunoblot inhibition studies revealed that 14-, 16-, 28-, 38-, 42- and 46-kDa proteins are the cross-reactive proteins in H. integrifolia and P. judaica. However, Par j 1, the major allergen of P. judaica, is absent in H. integrifolia pollen. CONCLUSION: H. integrifolia and P. judaica pollens share cross-reactive as well as unique epitopes. The major allergen of P. judaica, Par j 1, seems to be absent in H. integrifolia pollen allergen.     

Lettuce anaphylaxis: identification of a lipid transfer protein as the major allergen

BACKGROUND: Allergy to plant-derived foods is associated with birch pollinosis in central and northern Europe. Symptoms elicited are usually limited to the oropharyngeal system. By contrast, in the Mediterranean area, allergy to the same foods manifests more frequently with systemic reactions caused by nonspecific lipid transfer proteins (nsLTP), independently of an associated pollinosis. OBJECTIVE: We sought to investigate the pattern of immunoglobulin E (IgE) binding protein bands implicated in lettuce allergy, in particular the presence of an nsLTP. METHODS: Consecutive lettuce allergic patients were selected. Determination of serum-specific IgE, immunoblot, and inhibition experiments were performed in order to study the pattern of IgE binding proteins and the potential cross-reactivity to pollens. Inhibition studies with recombinant allergens were conducted to identify the lettuce allergens. The major allergen was subjected to N-terminal amino acid sequencing. RESULTS: Fourteen patients were diagnosed as being allergic to lettuce. All were sensitized to Platanus pollen. Ten of them showed specific IgE to a lettuce protein of 9-kDa. The IgE binding to this protein was completely inhibited by the cherry-LTP and peach extract. The N-terminal sequence of the 9-kDa protein showed a high degree of amino acid sequence identity to other nsLTPs. A clear partial cross-reactivity was observed between lettuce-LTP and Platanus-pollen extract. CONCLUSIONS: An LTP has been demonstrated to be a major allergen in patients suffering from lettuce allergy.     

Allergenic cross-reactivity of olive pollen

BACKGROUND: Sera of patients allergic to olive (Olea europaea) pollen were used to analyze the IgE cross-reactivity between olive-pollen extract and other pollens obtained from phylogenetically unrelated species. METHODS: We used IgE immunostaining of pollen extracts blotted to nitrocellulose membranes after SDS-PAGE and inhibition analysis of this binding. RESULTS: A high inhibition of the IgE binding on olive-pollen extract was exhibited by birch, mugwort, pine, and cypress pollens, suggesting that these extracts contain proteins which share common epitopes and thus can be recognized by olive-allergic sera. IgE binding to Gramineae pollen extracts was not inhibited by olive-pollen extract, indicating a primary sensitization of the patients to these species. From the inhibition assays, the presence of an allergen of 45 kDa in the olive pollen, which has no homologous counterparts in other allergenic species, has been inferred. CONCLUSIONS: Olive pollen contains allergens which cross-react with pollens from unrelated species, a fact that could simplify the diagnosis and treatment of pollinosis.     

花粉变应原的分类和相关的进化分析

目的 分析各种花粉变应原所属的蛋白家族,统计各类蛋白作为变应原出现的次数和在各科植物间的分布情况,结合进化树分析,以了解花粉变应原在自然界分布的一般规律.方法 通过NCBI数据库获取目前已知的所有变应原.用批处理(Batch Entrez)获得全部的氨基酸序列.将每个序列与Pfam数据库比对,以确定各种花粉变应原所属的蛋白家族.对成员众多的Profilin、Ex-pansin家族,应用BLAST搜索变应原的同源序列,获取序列号,Batch Entrez获得全部的氨基酸序列,最后用MEGA4.0软件生成进化树.结果 目前已知的168个花粉变应原,分属于26个蛋白家族.其中,Profilin、pollen_allerg_1和EF hand是3种成员最多的变应原家族,分别有25、20、19种变应原,占总数的38%.10个排名靠前的蛋白家族,变应原数量占总数的79%.在花粉变应原家族中,既有Profilin般分布广泛的,几乎涉及所有的科;也有局限于某科植物的如Ribonuclease、FAD_binding pro-tein、Amb_V、Thaumatin等.通过进化分析可知,各种Profilin变应原高度同源,变应原序列在不同物种间具有高度保守性.禾本科花粉的β-Expansin与无变应原性的Expansin分开进化.结论 通过对花粉变应原的蛋白家族分类,可为变态反应学的基础研究、过敏性疾病的临床诊疗提供参考,并有助于快速发现新的致敏物种和新的变应原.Profilin的高度保守性可能是交叉反应(cross reactivity)发生的主要原因之一.     

Phleum pratense alone is sufficient for allergen-specific immunotherapy against allergy to Pooideae grass pollens

Background Specific immunotherapy is the only causal treatment of allergy available today. Traditionally, therapeutic products based on either a single grass species or a mix of such extracts are used for grass pollen immunotherapy. Investigations comparing the immunological response to these allergen preparations are needed to ensure optimal treatment. The objective of this study was to investigate patterns of T and B cell cross-reactivity to Pooideae single-species extracts and to extract mixes.
Methods IgG4 induced by immunotherapy with Phleum pratense extract was investigated for cross-reactivity using nine single-species extracts and four mixes. For the mixes, studies of IgE cross-reactivity were also performed. T cell cross-reactivity was investigated in lines specific to nPhl p 1 or nPhl p 5 allergens, and the amounts of group 1 and 5 allergens in the extracts were quantified by a single radial immunodiffusion.
Results The levels of treatment-induced IgG4 detected by all the extracts displayed a clear correlation to that detected by the P. pratense pollen extract. The IgE studies confirmed the cross-reactivity of P. pratense -specific B cells towards the allergens contained in the mixes, and the T cell studies demonstrated cross-reactivity towards group 1 and 5 major allergens in extracts of six temperate grass species.
Conclusion Extensive T and B cell cross-reactivity was observed towards the allergens of the Pooideae grasses, and the degree of B cell cross-reactivity was independent of the number of species included in the extract mixes. This implies that treatment with pollen extract of just one Pooideae species will affect the allergic responses caused by any of the temperate grasses in this subfamily.     

Key pollen allergens in North America.

OBJECTIVE: To discuss major pollen aeroallergens in North America that are essential for effective immunotherapy and to propose a list of pollen aeroallergens that could be prioritized for allergen standardization. DATA SOURCES: PubMed was used to search the existing medical literature. No date restrictions were used. Keywords included allergy, aeroallergen, taxonomy, cross-reactivity, pollen, and specific genus and species names. RESULTS: Tree species possess relatively unique allergens, and representative members should be chosen at the genus or family level. In the Composite family, there is significant cross-reactivity between ragweed species within the Ambrosia genus. Selection of one species should be sufficient for skin testing and immunotherapy. Extensive allergenic cross-reactivity exists among grasses. Selection of timothy grass alone or in combination with a single northern grass species provides adequate coverage in the northeastern regions of North America. CONCLUSIONS: One of the goals within the field of allergy should be to identify high-priority targets for future development of standardized commercial extracts. The standardization of increasing numbers of allergen extracts potentially benefits the discipline of allergy by facilitating transfer of care among physician practices, improving uniformity of patient care, and providing a template on which geographically specific extract choices can be built.     

The allergen profile of ash (Fraxinus excelsior) pollen: cross-reactivity with allergens from various plant species

BACKGROUND: Ash, a wind-pollinated tree belonging to the family Oleaceae, is distributed world-wide and has been suggested as a potent allergen source in spring time. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the profile of allergen components in ash pollen in order to refine diagnosis and therapy for patients with sensitivity to ash pollen METHODS: The IgE reactivity profile of 40 ash pollen-allergic patients was determined by immunoblotting. Antibodies raised to purified pollen allergens from tree and grass pollens were used to identify cross-reactive structures in ash pollen extract. IgE immunoblot inhibition studies were performed with recombinant and natural pollen allergens to characterize ash pollen allergens and to determine the degree of cross-reactivity between pollen allergens from ash, olive, birch, grasses and weeds. RESULTS: The allergen profile of ash pollen comprises Fra e 1, a major allergen related to the major olive allergen, Ole e 1, and to group 11 grass pollen allergens, the panallergen profilin, a two EF-hand calcium-binding protein, a pectinesterase-like molecule and an allergen sharing epitopes with group 4 grass pollen allergens. Thus, the relevant allergens of ash are primarily allergens that share epitopes with pollen allergens from other tree, grass and weed species. CONCLUSIONS: Allergic symptoms to ash pollen can be the consequence of sensitization to cross-reactive allergens from other sources. The fact that ash pollen-allergic patients can be discriminated on the basis of their specific IgE reactivity profile to highly or moderately cross-reactive allergens has implications for the selection of appropriate forms of treatment.     

Heterogeneity of commercial timothy grass pollen extracts

Background The diagnosis and specific immunotherapy of allergy is currently performed with allergen extracts prepared from natural allergen sources.
Objective To analyse commercial timothy grass pollen allergen extracts used for in vivo diagnosis regarding their qualitative and quantitative allergen composition and in vivo biological activity.
Methods Antibodies specific for eight timothy grass pollen allergens (Phl p 1, Phl p 2, Phl p 4, Phl p 5, Phl p 6, Phl p 7, Phl p 12, Phl p 13) were used to detect these allergens in timothy grass pollen extracts from four manufacturers by immunoblotting. ELISA assays were developed and used to quantify the three major allergens (Phl p 1, Phl p 2, Phl p 5) in the extracts. The magnitude of skin responses to the four extracts was studied by skin prick testing in 10 grass pollen-allergic patients.
Results The allergen extracts showed broad variations in protein compositions and amounts (24.1–197.7 μg/mL extract). Several allergens could not be detected in certain extracts or appeared degraded. A considerable variability regarding the contents of major allergens was found (Phl p 1: 32–384 ng/mL; Phl p 2: 1128–6530 ng/mL, Phl p 5: 40–793 ng/mL). Heterogeneous skin test results were obtained with the extracts in grass pollen-allergic patients.
Conclusions Timothy grass pollen extracts from different manufacturers exhibit a considerable heterogeneity regarding the presence of individual allergens and hence yield varying in vivo test results. Problems related to the use of natural grass pollen allergen extracts may be circumvented by using defined recombinant grass pollen allergens.     

Pathogenesis-related proteins of plants as allergens.

OBJECTIVE: Many pathogenesis-related (PR) proteins from plants are allergenic. We review the evidence that PR proteins represent an increasingly important group of plant-derived allergens. DATA SOURCES: A detailed literature search was conducted through PubMed and GenBank databases. STUDY SELECTION: All reports in PubMed and GenBank related to PR protein allergens for which at least partial amino acid sequence is known were included. RESULTS: Production of PR proteins by plants is induced in plants by stress. Members of PR-protein groups 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 10, and 14 have demonstrated allergenicity. PR2-, 3-, 4-, and 8-homologous allergens are represented by the latex allergens. Cross-reactivity of PR3 latex allergen, Hev b 6.02, with some fruit allergens may be a reflection of the representation of homologous PR proteins among varied plants. The expression of one of the representative PR5-homologous cedar pollen allergens, Jun a 3, is highly variable across years and geographic areas, possibly because of variable induction of this PR protein by environmental factors. PR10-homologous birch pollen allergen, Bet v 1, is structurally similar to and cross-reacts with PR10 proteins from fruits (eg, Mal d 1) which cause oral allergy syndrome. PR14 allergens (eg, Zea m 14) consist of lipid transfer proteins found in grains and fruits and are inducers of anaphylaxis. CONCLUSIONS: PR-homologous allergens are pervasive in nature. Similarity in the amino acid sequences among members of PR proteins may be responsible for cross-reactivity among allergens from diverse plants. Induced expression of PR-homologous allergens by environmental factors may explain varying degrees of allergenicity. Man-made environmental pollutants may also alter the expression of some PR protein allergens.     

Group 13 grass allergens: structural variability between different grass species and analysis of proteolytic stability

BACKGROUND: Determination of the allergen composition of an extract is essential for the improvement of hyposensitization therapy. Surprisingly, although grass pollen extracts have been studied intensively for 20 years, a further major allergen, Phl p 13, was detected recently in timothy grass pollen. OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine the occurrence and importance of group 13 allergens in various grass species and to investigate their proteolytic stability. METHODS: The group 13 allergens were determined by means of 2-dimensional PAGE blotting with patient sera and group 13-specific mAbs. The allergens were isolated chromatographically from several pollen extracts and analyzed by means of microsequencing. Cross-reactivity among various grass species was studied by using Western blots and immunoblot inhibition tests. The stability of the allergens was tested under defined extraction conditions. RESULTS: Group 13 allergens are detectable in all common grasses and show IgE cross-reactivity among them. The allergenic components were identified in the neutral pH range with molecular masses of 50 to 60 kd, and in the case of Phl p 13, maximal binding of the isoforms was observed at 55 kd and at an isoelectric point of 6 to 7.5. Protein sequencing clearly confirms structural identities between different grass species, although individual variations are found. If low-molecular-mass components were depleted by means of gel filtration, a rapid degradation of group 13 allergens was observed. This is in contrast to other pollen allergens described thus far. CONCLUSION: Group 13 allergens are widespread and are major allergens in the grasses. Predicted from their primary structures, these allergens are polygalacturonases. This class of enzymes is already known from microorganisms, and these enzymes are recognized as potential inducers of asthma. Our studies indicate that the group 13 allergens show a considerable microheterogeneity and degradation, especially after depletion of low-molecular-mass components. One has to be aware of this pivotal fact when soluble grass pollen extracts are prepared for diagnostics and hyposensitization therapy.