Chronic hepatitis B virus infection in renal transplant recipients

Although in Western Europe and North America the prevalence of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection has declined in patients awaiting renal transplantation, it remains a relevant clinical problem, mainly in patients with a long history of renal replacement therapy (RRT) who may have been infected many years ago. At the same time, a significant proportion of renal transplant recipients (RTR) is at risk for HBV infection in areas with endemic HBV. HBV infection may increase morbidity and mortality in RTR. The majority of long-term studies reported reduced patient survival compared with hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-negative RTR. The risk for morbidity and mortality of HBsAg-positive RTR transplantation is probably related to the extent of pretransplant liver disease. A thorough evaluation, including liver biopsy in many patients, is required to assess the individual HBsAg-positive patient's risk-benefit ratio. The influence of immunosuppressive therapy on HBV replication and HBV-associated complications is not well established and for clinical practice individually tailored immunosuppression is recommended in HBsAg-positive RTR. Careful screening for HBV reactivation in HBsAg-positive RTR and a regular clinical follow-up after renal transplantation (RTX) including liver sonography is required for early detection of HBV-associated complications. With the availability of new antiviral drugs, new options for pre- and posttransplant therapy might improve the prognosis of RTR with chronic HBV infection.     

Genotypic resistance of hepatitis B virus to lamivudine in renal transplant recipients

Renal recipients with hepatitis B virus (HBV) should be treated with prolonged lamivudine. However, lamivudine resistance usually results after YMDD mutation within the HBV polymerase gene. Thereupon, the aim of this study was to investigate the genotypic resistance to lamivudine among renal transplant recipients to identify its effect on the clinical course of HBV in these patients. Between March 1997 and September 2003, eight of 17 renal transplant patients with hepatitis B virus were enrolled into this study and treated with 100 mg of lamivudine once each day. We amplified a selected region of the polymerase gene of HBV in order to confirm mutations in the YMDD motif. Mutations of YMDD region were observed in five of eight patients (62.5%). Out of five patients positive for HBV DNA, three (60%) showed genotypic resistance (YMDD mutation) with a normal ALT level. Two patients converted to HBV DNA negative. But, they were not associated with HBeAg seroconversion. Out of three patients who were pretransplant HBV DNA negative, genotypic resistance was observed in two patients (67%) revealing both positivity of HBe antibody and negativity of HBV DNA. In conclusion, although a normal ALT level and HBV DNA negative are maintained, the mutation of the YMDD locus may develop. Accordingly, we suggest that if the YMDD mutation is not involved in the progression of hepatitis B, lamivudine therapy should be continued despite genotypic resistance.     

Limited efficacy of lamivudine against hepatitis B virus infection in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients

BACKGROUND: Reactivation of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is a major complication when HBV carriers receive immunosuppressive therapy. Recipients of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) carry the highest risk of fatal HBV disease (up to 12%). METHODS: In an attempt to identify a suitable procedure for the prevention and management of HBV reactivation, the administration of lamivudine over the course was tested in two patients. RESULTS: Generally, the patients transplant courses were successfully managed despite their difficult clinical situations: a high HBV load before transplant in one patient and intense steroid therapy for complicated acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) in the other patient. However, one patient showed a reactivation of HBV after discontinuing lamivudine and the other showed persistently high DNA polymerase activity despite prolonged administration of lamivudine. CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that lamivudine could have a place in the management of patients who suffer from chronic HBV infection and who are undergoing allogeneic HSCT. However, the efficacy of lamivudine seemed to be limited compared with other settings, including solid organ transplantation and autologous HSCT.     

Long-term lamivudine monotherapy prevents development of hepatitis B virus infection in hepatitis B surface-antigen negative liver transplant recipients from hepatitis B core-antibody-positive donors

BACKGROUND: Liver transplantation from hepatitis B core-antibody (HBcAb)-positive donors to hepatitis B surface-antigen (HBsAg)-negative recipients has been associated with a risk of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection in the absence of antiviral prophylaxis. The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy of long-term lamivudine monotherapy to prevent development of HBV infection in HBsAg-negative recipients of liver allografts from HBcAb-positive donors. METHODS: From 315 cadaveric adult liver transplantations performed at our unit between July 1999 and March 2005, 18 recipients (5.7%) received liver allografts from HBcAb-positive donors, 13 of whom were HBsAg-negative pre-transplantation. The recipients consisted of four females and 14 males, age range 28-65 yr (median 49.5 yr). Post-transplantation, HBsAg-negative recipients were administered lamivudine 100 mg daily long term. HBsAg-positive recipients were administered low-dose hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIg) and lamivudine according to our usual protocol. Standard post-transplantation immunosuppression was given. Recipients were followed up regularly (range 2-69 months, median 21 months) for development of de novo HBV infection. RESULTS: Ten HBsAg-negative recipients received long-term lamivudine. One patient (HBcAb and HBsAb positive pre-transplant) did not receive lamivudine and, in two patients, lamivudine was discontinued following urgent re-transplantation for primary graft non-function. All 13 of the HBsAg-negative recipients were still alive, with no evidence of HBV infection at the end of follow-up. CONCLUSION: Long-term lamivudine monotherapy was effective in preventing development of HBV infection in HBsAg-negative liver transplant recipients from HBcAb-positive donors.     

Adefovir treatment for chronic hepatitis B in heart transplant recipients

Chronic hepatitis B is prevalent in the transplant setting and may cause significant complications. Effective control of viral replication is needed. Besides lamivudine, very little data are available on safety and efficacy of other drugs. We describe our experience with adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) in eight heart transplant recipients. Studies included a baseline liver biopsy, thrice‐monthly clinical, biochemical, and virological evaluations, including genotyping and viral load, polymerase gene sequencing for resistance mutations, liver and kidney function tests, and liver ultrasound. Of eight patients, six had fibrosis score ≤2 and negative HBeAg and seven had hepatitis B virus (HBV) genotype D. Upon ADV start, median HBV‐DNA was 5.8 logs IU/mL and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels were mostly normal. All patients had prior mild‐to‐moderate renal functional impairment. Seven of eight patients started ADV after a previous course of lamivudine. Five of these seven patients became HBV‐DNA undetectable within eight months. One patient with low baseline viremia started ADV de novo and suppressed HBV‐DNA. Median treatment duration was 66 months. ADV daily dose was halved in one patient due to renal function worsening. No ALT flares, hypophosphatemia, liver decompensation, liver cancer, or emergence of resistance was observed. Our data suggest that ADV may be a safe and effective rescue treatment for heart transplant recipients with lamivudine‐resistant chronic hepatitis B.     

乙型肝炎病毒和丙型肝炎病毒感染对肾移植受者存活的影响

目的探讨乙型肝炎病毒(HBV)和(或)丙型肝炎病毒(hepatitis C virus,HCV)感染对肾移植受者长期存活的影响及预防措施。方法 HBV和(或)HCV感染肾移植受者110例(感染组),其中HBV感染受者56例、HCV感染受者52例,HBV与HCV合并感染2例。非HBV与非HCV感染受者694例(非感染组)。感染组受者术前有病毒复制者予积极治疗,研究早期肝功能正常者可接受肾移植,后期均用聚合酶链反应(PCR)检测,要求连续3～6个月HBV脱氧核糖核酸(DNA)0copy/ml,HCV核糖核酸(RNA)0copy/ml方可接受肾移植。术后定期检测HBV与HCV,定期检测感染组受者HBVDNA滴度、HCVRNA滴度。发现HBV复制,选用拉米夫定、阿德福韦酯治疗,酌情减少免疫抑制剂用量。分别比较两组术后1、3、5年人、肾存活率,比较两组的肝功能衰竭病死率。结果非感染组人、肾存活率分别为:1年94.2%、91.4%,3年为86.4%、85.2%,5年为82.7%、78.9%;感染组人、肾存活率分别为:1年90.2%、88.1%,3年为88.9%、86.2%,5年为81.5%、76.3%;两组数据比较差异均无统计学意义(均为P>0.05)。感染组中14例(12.7%)死于肝功能衰竭,其中10例为HBV感染者,非感染组受者无1例死于肝衰竭。感染组术后肝衰竭病死率明显高于非感染组(12.7%、0,P<0.05)。结论受者术前HBV和(或)HCV感染会明显增加肾移植术后肝衰竭死亡危险。患者术前处于病毒复制期应予积极治疗,在肝炎病毒停止复制6个月后再考虑肾移植。长期随访中应定期复查HBV与HCV感染指标,早确诊、早治疗,并及时调整免疫抑制剂剂量。     

Clinical course of hepatitis C virus infection in renal transplant recipients

Patients with end-stage renal disease are at high risk for exposure to hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Although both viral replication and liver disease progression are accelerated after renal transplantation, the long-term impact of chronic HCV infection is unclear. Our aim was to analyze the course of HCV infection in renal transplant recipients and the effects of HCV reactivation on patient and graft survival. METHODS: We retrospectively examined the 21-year (1985-2006) data of 1274 renal transplant recipients, 43 of whom were anti-HCV positive at the time of transplantation. RESULTS: The mean posttransplant follow-up of 43 patients was 62.0 +/- 7.3 months. At the time of transplantation, HCV RNA was positive in 11 (25.6%) patients and negative in 32 (74.4%) patients. HCV reactivation was seen in 19 (45.2%) patients at a mean time of 20.8 +/- 5.7 months. In 31 (72%) patients, acute rejection occurred, whereas graft loss occurred in 10 (23%) patients. Three (7%) patients died. Among 43 patients, 22 (51.2%) were treated with interferon before transplantation. There was a statistically significant association between pretransplant interferon therapy and pretransplant HCVRNA level (P=.024), but no significant association of HCV reactivation and graft rejection, mortality, or kidney survival. CONCLUSION: HCV reactivation occurred in nearly half of the renal transplant recipients, mostly in the second year. Patient survival and graft survival were not affected by HCV reactivation. Anti-HCV positivity should not preclude chronic renal failure patients from renal transplantation.     

Liver transplant and chronic hepatitis B virus infection

Hepatitis B immune globulin use for preventing hepatitis B virus recurrence after liver transplant has changed our behavior radically, and it now seems that hepatitis B immune globulin has a vital role in preventing recurrence. New nucleotide or nucleoside analogues have promising results in treating chronic hepatitis and in posttransplant hepatitis B virus-infected patients. Hepatitis B immune globulin and other antivirals act on different pathways, so it is logical to combine these drugs to achieve maximum response in suppressing hepatitis B virus (HBV)-replication.     

Gamma-glutamyltransferase activity in chronic dialysis patients and renal transplant recipients with hepatitis C virus infection

The prevalences of chronic infection by hepatitis C virus (HCV) and its genotypes vary among countries and ethnic groups. Among patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and transplant recipients, the evolution of hepatic disease seems atypical and has not been established. In this study we compared the prevalence and HCV genotypic distribution among Brazilian patients with ESRD on dialysis or with transplantations. Moreover, we sought to compare the behavior of biochemical markers of hepatic activity of HCV infection in both groups. We prospectively evaluated 87 ESRD patients on dialysis and 105 transplant patients. Blood samples were obtained to perform qualitative HCV-RNA, genotyping, and, periodically, serum levels of aminotransferases (ALT, AST), gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT), alpha-fetoprotein (AFT), and albumin. The prevalence of HCV in ESRD patients was similar to recipients (19.5% vs 25.7%; P = NS) and the most frequent genotype was 1a. There was no difference in the mean values of ALT, GGT, AFT, and serum albumin between both groups with HCV infection. The mean values of aminotransferases were slightly elevated and a high frequency of patients evolved with persistently normal parameters. In contrast, the mean values of the GGT were 3 or 4 times above the reference limit and a greater frequency of patients evolved with values persistently elevated in the 2 groups. In conclusion, in the 2 groups the prevalence of HCV infection was elevated; the most frequent genotype was 1a. Among the biochemical parameters, GGT seemed to be useful as an indirect marker of liver disease.     

Fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis in renal transplant recipients with hepatitis C virus infection.

Fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis (FCH) has been described as a specific manifestation of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection in liver allograft recipients characterized by a rapid progression to liver failure. Only sporadic cases have been reported in other immunocompromised groups infected with HBV and in a few transplant recipients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. We present the occurrence of FCH in 4 HCV-infected renal transplant recipients within a series of 73 renal transplant recipients with HCV infection followed up closely serologically and with consecutive liver biopsies. All 4 patients received the triple-immunosuppressive regimen (azathioprine, cyclosporine A, methylprednisolone). The interval from transplantation to the appearance of liver dysfunction was 1 to 4 months and to histological diagnosis, 3 to 11 months. The biochemical profile was analogous to a progressive cholestatic syndrome in 3 patients, whereas the fourth patient had only slightly increased alanine aminotransferase and gamma-glutamyl transferase (gammaGT) levels. Liver histological examination showed the characteristic pattern of FCH in 2 patients, whereas the other 2 patients had changes compatible with an early stage. All patients were anti-HCV negative at the time of transplantation, whereas 2 patients, 1 with incomplete and 1with complete histological FCH features, seroconverted after 3 and 31 months, respectively. The patients were HCV RNA positive at the time of the first liver biopsy and showed high serum HCV RNA levels (14 to 58 x 10(6) Eq/mL, branched DNA). HCV genotype was 1b in 3 patients and 3a in 1 patient. After histological diagnosis, immunosuppression was drastically reduced. Two patients died of sepsis and liver failure 16 and 18 months posttransplantation, whereas the seroconverted patients showed marked improvement of their liver disease, which was histologically verified in 1 patient. In conclusion, FCH can occur in HCV-infected renal transplant recipients. It seems to develop as a complication of a recent HCV infection during the period of maximal immunosuppression and is associated with high HCV viremia levels. There are indications that drastic reduction of immunosuppression may have a beneficial effect on the outcome of the disease.     

Lamivudine monoprophylaxis for liver transplant recipients with non-replicating hepatitis B virus infection

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of lamivudine (LAM) monoprophylaxis for patients with non-replicating hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection at orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). METHODS: Among 128 liver recipients with HBV infection between 1994 and 2004 transplanted at our institution, 60 had non-replicating HBV infection at the time of OLT. Of those, 26 patients received LAM prophylaxis (monoprophylaxis group) and 34 patients received LAM and hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) prophylaxis (combination group) after OLT. RESULTS: Median follow-up after OLT was 67 and 54 months, for monoprophylaxis and combination groups respectively. One and five yr patient/graft survival were 96/85% and 96/80% in monoprophylaxis group, and 85/79% and 67/55% in combination group. HBV DNA was re-detected or increased >10(5) IU/mL in four patients (15%) at 20-29 month in monoprophylaxis group and six (18%) at 4-35 months in combination group. Recurrent hepatitis was seen in two patients (8%) at 27 and 45 months and monoprophylaxis group and three (9%) at 21-35 months in combination group. The rate of recurrence was not statistically different between two groups. CONCLUSION: LAM monoprophylaxis seemed to be effective for OLT recipients with HBV infection who had non-replicating HBV at transplantation. HBIG administration may play a less valuable role in preventing HBV recurrence in this group of patients.     

血清肝炎病毒标志物阳性肾移植患者临床用药特点

目的 探讨血清肝炎病毒标志物阳性。肾移植患者术后临床用药特点。方法 40例同种异体。肾移植患者，男22例，女18例。年龄30～56岁。其中乙型肝炎感染29例、丙型肝炎感染9例、乙型肝炎合并丙型肝炎感染2例。患者肝功能正常，随机分为普乐可复组（n=20），环孢素A组（n=20）。观察患者术后肝、肾功能情况及人／。肾存活率。结果 40例患者术后随访2年，普乐可复组肝功能异常发生率、急性排斥反应发生率明显低于环孢素A组（分别为15％vs30％，5％vs20％），2组2年人／肾存活率均为100％。结论 血清肝炎病毒标志物阳性患者接受肾移植术后首选普乐可复作为基础免疫制剂方案，可减少排斥反应发生率，对肝脏的损害程度轻。