A pilot study of combination therapy with initial high-dose interferon and amantadine hydrochloride for patients with chronic hepatitis C with the genotype 1b virus

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Interferon monotherapy for patients with chronic hepatitis C has been suboptimal. We studied the effect of the combination therapy of an initial high-dose of interferon and amantadine. METHODOLOGY: We investigated the virological response of 20 patients with naive chronic hepatitis C with a high viral load of the genotype 1b virus. Seven patients were administered 6MU of interferon-beta once daily for 6 weeks and then thrice weekly for 20 weeks, and 13 were administered 6 MU of interferon-beta daily for 4 or 6 weeks and then 10 MU of natural interferon-alpha thrice weekly for 22 or 20 weeks. All patients were treated with amantadine hydrochloride (100 mg/day) for 26 weeks during interferon administration. RESULTS: The complete response, transient response and no response rate were 15.0%, 60.0%, and 25%, respectively. After daily administration of interferon-beta intravenously, 19 patients (95.0%) showed negative tests for serum HCV-RNA by the polymerase chain reaction method. At the end of treatment, the serum HCV-RNA was not detected in any patients treated with daily interferon-beta and intermittent interferon-alpha with amantadine. At 6-month follow-up, three patients had eradicated HCV-RNA, who were in the group of daily interferon-beta and intermittent interferon-alpha with amantadine. In the patients treated with daily interferon-beta and intermittent interferon-alpha with amantadine, the complete response, transient response and no response rates were 23.1%,-76.9% and 0%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that the combination of an initial high-dose interferon and amantadine shows promising effects on the eradication of HCV-RNA in the chronic hepatitis C patients with a high viral load of the genotype 1b virus.     

Interferon treatment for patients with chronic hepatitis C infected with high viral load of genotype 2 virus

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Interferon treatment is more effective in patients with chronic hepatitis C infected with genotype 2a virus than those with genotype 1b virus. We analyzed patients with chronic hepatitis C treated by interferon in our clinics to develop a more effective regimen of interferon treatment for patients with genotype 2 virus infection. METHODOLOGY: We retrospectively analyzed the virological response of 36 patients with chronic hepatitis C with a high viral load, including 28 cases infected with the genotype 2a virus and 8 cases with the genotype 2b virus. The serum viral load of these patients were 6.0 log copies/mL and higher by the competitive polymerase chain reaction assay method. All patients could be treated with interferon-alpha or -beta for 6 months. Eleven patients were administered 6 million units of interferon-beta once daily for 6 weeks and then thrice weekly (group A). Twelve patients were administered 6 million units of interferon-alpha daily initially for 2 weeks and then thrice weekly (group B), and 10 patients were treated with the same dose of interferon-alpha thrice weekly from the first administration (group C). We decided the criteria of complete remission as the absence of serum HCV-RNA at both points of the end of interferon treatment and 6 months later. RESULTS: For all patients with genotype 2a virus infection, the complete remission, transient response and no response rates were 46.4%, 39.3% and 14.3%, respectively. The complete remission rates in group A, B and C were 100%, 41.7% and 20%, respectively. The transient remission rates in group B and C were 41.7% and 60%, respectively. The no response rates in group B and C were 16.7% and 20%, respectively. All patients with a high viral load of genotype 2a virus showed eradicated serum HCV-RNA virus in group A. The eradication rate of serum HCV-RNA in patients infected with the genotype 2a virus in group A was significantly higher than that of group B (p < 0.02) or group C (p < 0.01). For all patients with genotype 2b virus infection, complete remission, transient remission and no response rates were 12.5%, 50.0% and 37.5%, respectively. The complete remission rate of patients with the genotype 2b virus in group A and group B plus C was 0% and 25.0%, respectively. The eradication rate of patients with the genotype 2a virus in group A was significantly higher than that of patients with the genotype 2b virus (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that the initial sufficient dose of interferon administration is effective to eradicate serum HCV-RNA in patients with a high viral load of genotype 2a virus in chronic hepatitis C.     

Triple therapy of initial high-dose interferon with ribavirin and amantadine for patients with chronic hepatitis C

Aims: We previously reported the potential effect of combination therapy of an initial high‐dose interferon (IFN) and amantadine on the eradication of HCV‐RNA in patients with chronic hepatitis C. The additive effects of amantadine on interferon and ribavirin combination therapy remain controversial. In this study we investigated the efficacy of initial high‐dose IFN with ribavirin and amantadine on the virological response in patients with chronic hepatitis C with a high viral load of genotype 1b. Methods: Twenty‐two patients with high viral loads of genotype 1b hepatitis C virus were enrolled in this pilot study. Patients were administered IFN‐beta for four weeks and then IFN‐alpha2b for 22 weeks with daily oral administration of ribavirin and amantadine. Results: A sustained virological response (SVR) was shown in 31.8% (seven of 22 patients). With the naïve patients, the SVR rate was 21.4% (three of 14 patients). In patients who could not eradicate HCV‐RNA by previous IFN monotherapy, the SVR rate was 50% (four of eight patients). Conclusion: Triple therapy with an initial high dose of IFN with ribavirin and amantadine may be effective, especially for chronic hepatitis C IFN‐retreatment patients with a high viral load of genotype 1b.     

Daily or three times a week interferon alfa-2b in combination with ribavirin or interferon alone for the treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Data on hepatitis C virus (HCV) viral dynamics and on the effect of interferon in blocking virion production have suggested a rationale for daily administration of interferon in patients with chronic hepatitis C infection. We compared the efficacy and safety of daily interferon alfa-2b in combination with ribavirin with those of interferon alfa-2b three times a week alone or in combination with ribavirin. METHODS: We randomly assigned 321 patients with chronic hepatitis C to receive standard-dose interferon alfa-2b alone or in combination with ribavirin for 48 weeks or daily interferon alfa-2b (3 million units per day for 12 weeks then 3 million units three times per week for 24 weeks) and ribavirin (36 week treatment). RESULTS: The rate of sustained virologic response (defined as an undetectable serum HCV-RNA level 72 weeks after initiation of treatment) was higher in patients who received combination therapy with three times weekly interferon (51.7%) or daily interferon (46.1%) than in patients who received interferon alone (25%) (P=0.0001 and P=0.002, respectively). Independent predictive factors for sustained virologic response were combination therapy, weight, genotype and viral load. In conclusion, in patients with chronic hepatitis C, combination therapy with induction treatment (daily interferon for 12 weeks) and shorter duration of treatment was not different from combination therapy for 48 weeks without induction treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Induction treatment with interferon for 12 weeks and combination therapy for a total duration of 36 weeks could therefore be cost effective.     

Randomised, double blind, placebo controlled trial of interferon, ribavirin, and amantadine versus interferon, ribavirin, and placebo in treatment naïve patients with chronic hepatitis C

BACKGROUND AND AIM: In this study, we compared the efficacy of triple therapy (interferon alfa, ribavirin, and amantadine) with standard therapy (interferon alfa and ribavirin) in treatment na?ve patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV). METHODS: In this prospective, randomised, double blind, placebo controlled, multicentre study, 85 patients (amantadine group) received a three drug regimen of interferon alfa-2b 3 million units three times per week, ribavirin 1000-1200 mg daily in divided doses, and amantadine 100 mg twice daily, and 86 patients (placebo group) received interferon alfa-2b, ribavirin, and identical placebo. Treatment was discontinued at 24 weeks if patients had detectable HCV RNA by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). All patients were followed for 24 weeks after completion of treatment. The primary end point was undetectable HCV-RNA by PCR at 24 weeks (sustained viral clearance) after completion of treatment. RESULTS: At the end of treatment, HCV RNA clearance was seen in 32.9% of the amantadine group and 38.4% of the placebo group (p=0.3). Sustained virological response was seen in 24.7% of the amantadine group and in 27.9% of the placebo group by intention to treat analysis; response rate was 30.4% and 34.8%, respectively, in those who completed 24 weeks of treatment. Poor response was seen in both groups among cirrhotics, African-Americans, genotype 1, and those with a higher viral load. By multivariate analysis, genotype 1, high viral load, and low serum albumin were the only predictors of poor response. Addition of amantadine to the standard regimen did not result in any unexpected side effects. CONCLUSION: Response to triple therapy of interferon alfa, ribavirin, and amantadine was similar to standard therapy of interferon alfa and ribavirin. Our results suggest that amantadine has no role in the management of HCV.     

First-line therapy with daily versus thrice-weekly interferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin for chronic hepatitis C

OBJECTIVES: Combination therapy with interferon and ribavirin is the most effective treatment for chronic hepatitis C today. Before pegylated interferons became available, higher and more frequent doses of interferon were expected to be more effective than the standard regimen of three million units thrice weekly. In fact, daily dosing is still proposed for non-pegylated interferon. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of daily versus thrice-weekly interferon alfa-2b in combination with ribavirin as first-line treatment of chronic hepatitis C. METHODS: A total of 116 treatment-naive patients were randomised to receive either interferon alfa-2b three million units daily or thrice-weekly in combination with ribavirin for 24 weeks. Patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 who were HCV-RNA negative at 24 weeks continued treatment with thrice-weekly interferon plus ribavirin for another 24 weeks. Sustained virological response was defined as an undetectable HCV-RNA level 24 weeks after treatment was completed (end of follow-up). RESULTS: In an intention-to-treat analysis, HCV-RNA was undetectable at the end of treatment in 71% and 74% of patients treated with daily and thrice-weekly interferon, respectively. At the end of follow-up, HCV-RNA was undetectable in 47% and 57% of patients treated with daily and thrice-weekly interferon, respectively. Sustained virological response rates were almost twice as high in patients with genotypes 2 and 3 as in patients with genotype 1 but were not different between treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study could not show any difference between daily and thrice-weekly standard interferon plus ribavirin in achieving end-of-treatment and sustained virological responses in chronic hepatitis C.     

Efficacy of natural BALL-1 interferon-alpha treatment for patients with chronic hepatitis C and a possible enhancing effect of a twice-daily starting regimen with interferon-beta

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Two distinct natural interferon-alpha (BALL-1 and Namalwa) are available for patients with chronic hepatitis C in Japan, but the efficacy has not been well documented. We investigated two studies using a natural BALL-1 interferon-alpha treatment for chronic hepatitis C and assessed its efficacy. METHODOLOGY: In interferon-alpha monotherapy (Study I), 42 patients with chronic hepatitis C received 10 mega units of BALL-1 interferon-alpha intramuscularly consecutively for an initial 2 weeks followed by three times a week for 6 months totally. In a combination therapy of natural interferon-alpha and interferon-beta (Study II), 24 patients received intravenous 3 mega units of interferon-beta twice daily for the initial 2 weeks followed by 10 mega units of natural BALL-1 interferon-alpha consecutively for 2 weeks and three times a week for 6 months totally. Efficacy and predictive factors for sustained viral response was investigated. RESULTS: Study II included significant younger patients than study I. Sustained virological response was obtained in 31.0% in Study I and 56.5% in Study II by intention-to-treat analysis. Sustained viral response in the group of genotype 1b and viral load more than 100 KIU/mL was 3/23 (13.0%) and 8/18 (44.4%) in Study I and II, respectively. The response rate in Study II was higher than that of Study I especially among the patients with high pretreatment viral load or genotype 1b (p<0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that pre-treatment HCV-RNA levels, HCV-genotype, and histological staging before the interferon treatment were significant predictive factors of sustained viral response. CONCLUSIONS: These studies suggest that natural BALL-1 interferon-alpha is useful for inducing sustained viral response in patients with chronic hepatitis C, even in those possessing genotype 1b and high viral load. In addition, the combination therapy with a starting regimen with twice-daily interferon-beta administration for 2 weeks may be more effective than monotherapy.     

Combination of interferon alfa-2a and amantadine does not improve the efficacy of interferon therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis C

BACKGROUND/AIMS: A recent pilot study suggested that 18% of patients with hepatitis C viral infection achieved a sustained response to a 6-month course of 200 mg of oral amantadine alone with disappearance of serum hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid. We prospectively studied 30 naive patients with chronic hepatitis C viral infection for the possible role of amantadine in improving the efficiency of interferon for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C. METHODOLOGY: Patients were assigned into two groups on a double-blind and randomized controlled basis. Placebo group received 4.5 MU of interferon alfa-2a thrice weekly and oral placebo daily for 24 weeks. Amantadine group received a combination of the interferon and 200 mg of oral amantadine daily for 24 weeks. Patients were observed and tested for blood chemistry every week for the initial 4 weeks and every 2 weeks thereafter during the treatment until 24 weeks. After the end of treatment, patients were followed up at 4-week intervals for an additional 12 months. RESULTS: At the end of treatment, 5 (33.3%) patients responded to the combination therapy, and 7 (46.7%) patients responded to interferon therapy alone. Twelve months after cessation of the treatment, 3 (21.4%) patients had a sustained complete response to the combination therapy, and 3 (20.0%) patients had a sustained complete response to interferon alone (P = 0.64). CONCLUSION: Amantadine does not increase the efficacy of interferon in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C.     

Effect of treatment with interferon alpha-2b and ribavirin in patients infected with genotype 2 hepatitis C virus.

Aim: Nearly 20% of chronic hepatitis C (CHC) patients with genotype 2 hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection are not curable, even by interferon (IFN)-ribavirin combination therapy. The aim of this study is to investigate the factors that determine the efficacy of combination therapy in patients with genotype 2 HCV infection. Methods: Fifty patients with CHC who underwent a treatment of 6 MU IFN alpha-2b with ribavirin for 24 weeks were retrospectively analyzed. Results: All the patients showed no serum HCV-RNA within 12 weeks after starting the therapy. Forty-one of the 50 patients (82%) achieved a sustained virological response (SVR). The age, sex, genotype (2a vs. 2b) and grade/stage of the liver by histopathology and pretreatment viral load werenot different between the sustained responders and relapsers. Univariate analysis showed that an earlier viral clearance from blood and a larger number of amino acid substitutions in the interferon sensitivity determining region (ISDR) were predictors of SVR. Multivariate analysis showed that a large number of amino acid substitutions in the ISDR was a predictor of SVR. Conclusion: The characterization of the amino acid sequences of ISDR may be helpful for predicting a relapse after combination therapy in patients with genotype 2 HCV infection.     

Daily or three times per week interferon alpha-2b in combination with ribavirin or interferon alone for the treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C not responding to previous interferon alone

BACKGROUND/AIMS: We compared the efficacy and safety of the combined therapy of daily interferon alpha-2b and ribavirin with those of interferon alpha-2b three times per week alone or in combination with ribavirin in non-responder patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection.METHODS: A total of 376 patients were randomly assigned to receive interferon alpha-2b (6 MU three times per week for 24 weeks followed by 3 MU three times per week for 24 weeks) alone (group A) or in combination with ribavirin for 48 weeks (group B), or daily interferon alpha-2b (3 MU per day for 24 weeks followed by 3 MU three times per week for 24 weeks) and ribavirin (group C).RESULTS: After 24 weeks of therapy, HCV RNA was undetectable in 11.7, 24.0, and 37.8% for groups A, B, and C, respectively. Sustained virological response was more frequent in patients who received combination therapy with three times weekly interferon (20.9%) or daily interferon (26.0%) than in patients who received interferon alone (5.8%) (P<0.001). The predictive HCV parameters for sustained response were a low viral load on day 7 and a negative HCV RNA on week 12.CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, in non-responder patients with chronic hepatitis C, virological response with daily interferon and ribavirin, compared to interferon monotherapy, was significantly improved during treatment, although sustained virological response was similar for both combination therapies with ribavirin and three times a week or daily interferon.     

Viral kinetics of hepatitis C virus RNA in patients with chronic hepatitis C treated with 18 MU of interferon alpha daily

BACKGROUND: A rapid decrease of hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA is interferon (IFN) dose-dependent, and a 3-log decline of HCV-RNA is a strong predictor of sustained virological response. In this study, viral kinetics of HCV RNA in patients treated with 18 MU interferon alpha (IFN-alpha) daily for 2 weeks are presented. METHODS: Thirteen treatment-naive patients with chronic hepatitis C received 6 MU of IFN-alpha2a every 8 h for 2 weeks. Samples were obtained daily during the treatment period. HCV-RNA levels were determined using the quantitative VERSANT 3.0 bDNA assay (detection limit 520 IU/ml). When results were below the detection limit, HCV-RNA was measured by qualitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using the COBAS AMPLICOR HCV test, version 2.0 (detection limit of 50 IU/ml). RESULTS: In patients infected with genotype non-1, a 3-log decline of viral load was found 2.4 days after the start of induction therapy. Only one of three patients infected with genotype 1 had a 3-log decline in viral load within 14 days of the start of therapy. In four patients, a third phase of viral decline was observed. At the end of treatment, 10/13 (77%) and 7/13 (54%) patients were HCV-RNA-negative in quantitative assay and qualitative PCR, respectively. Only one of 13 patients achieved a sustained virological response (SVR). CONCLUSION: Daily administration of 18 MU IFN-alpha to patients infected with genotype non-1 induces a 3-log decline of viral load within 2.4 days of the start of treatment. In patients infected with genotype 1, only one-third of patients have a 3-log decline at 11 days.     

Effect of treatment with interferon α-2b and ribavirin in patients infected with genotype 2 hepatitis C virus

Aim:  Nearly 20% of chronic hepatitis C (CHC) patients with genotype 2 hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection are not curable, even by interferon (IFN)–ribavirin combination therapy. The aim of this study is to investigate the factors that determine the efficacy of combination therapy in patients with genotype 2 HCV infection.
Methods:  Fifty patients with CHC who underwent a treatment of 6 MU IFN α-2b with ribavirin for 24 weeks were retrospectively analyzed.
Results:  All the patients showed no serum HCV-RNA within 12 weeks after starting the therapy. Forty-one of the 50 patients (82%) achieved a sustained virological response (SVR). The age, sex, genotype (2a vs. 2b) and grade/stage of the liver by histopathology and pretreatment viral load werenot different between the sustained responders and relapsers. Univariate analysis showed that an earlier viral clearance from blood and a larger number of amino acid substitutions in the interferon sensitivity determining region (ISDR) were predictors of SVR. Multivariate analysis showed that a large number of amino acid substitutions in the ISDR was a predictor of SVR.
Conclusion:  The characterization of the amino acid sequences of ISDR may be helpful for predicting a relapse after combination therapy in patients with genotype 2 HCV infection.     

A randomized, controlled trial of triple antiviral therapy as initial treatment of chronic hepatitis C in HIV-infected patients

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Interferon and ribavirin combination therapy for chronic hepatitis C induces a low response rate in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infected patients. To assess the impact of intensification of interferon administration and of the addition of amantadine on the efficacy and safety of standard anti-hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment in HIV-infected patients. METHODS: Multicentre, prospective, open-label, randomized, phase III clinical trial. Eighty co-infected patients were randomized to receive ribavirin 800-1,000 mg/day in combination with, group A: interferon alpha 2a 3MIU thrice weekly; group B: IFN alpha 2a 3MIU daily, plus amantadine 200 mg/day; treatment duration was 24-48 weeks according to HCV genotype. RESULTS: Forty-one patients were randomized in group A and 39 in group B. Intention-to-treat analysis showed a sustained virological response, defined as HCV-RNA negativization, 6 months after stopping treatment in 22% of patients from group A and 13% from group B (P>0.05). The lack of a 2-log drop in HCV-RNA levels after 12 weeks of treatment showed a 100% predictive value of lack of sustained response. CONCLUSIONS: Amantadine addition and interferon intensification do not improve the low efficacy of combination of interferon alfa plus ribavirin in HIV/HCV co-infected patients. Patients with no early virologic response did not have any probability of sustained response.     

Daily or three times per week interferon α-2b in combination with ribavirin or interferon alone for the treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C not responding to previous interferon alone

Background/Aims: We compared the efficacy and safety of the combined therapy of daily interferon α-2b and ribavirin with those of interferon α-2b three times per week alone or in combination with ribavirin in non-responder patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection.Methods: A total of 376 patients were randomly assigned to receive interferon α-2b (6 MU three times per week for 24 weeks followed by 3 MU three times per week for 24 weeks) alone (group A) or in combination with ribavirin for 48 weeks (group B), or daily interferon α-2b (3 MU per day for 24 weeks followed by 3 MU three times per week for 24 weeks) and ribavirin (group C).Results: After 24 weeks of therapy, HCV RNA was undetectable in 11.7, 24.0, and 37.8% for groups A, B, and C, respectively. Sustained virological response was more frequent in patients who received combination therapy with three times weekly interferon (20.9%) or daily interferon (26.0%) than in patients who received interferon alone (5.8%) (P<0.001). The predictive HCV parameters for sustained response were a low viral load on day 7 and a negative HCV RNA on week 12.Conclusions: In conclusion, in non-responder patients with chronic hepatitis C, virological response with daily interferon and ribavirin, compared to interferon monotherapy, was significantly improved during treatment, although sustained virological response was similar for both combination therapies with ribavirin and three times a week or daily interferon.     

Evaluation of long-term efficacy of interferon alpha-2b and ribavirin in combination in naive patients with chronic hepatitis C: an Italian multicenter experience. Ribavirin-Interferon in Chronic Hepatitis Italian Group Investigators

BACKGROUND/AIMS: A combination of interferon alpha and ribavirin has been suggested to reach a higher rate of sustained virological response in patients with chronic hepatitis C than monotherapy. In this study we assessed the long-term efficacy of this combination therapy in the treatment of selected Italian naive chronic hepatitis C patients compared to interferon alpha monotherapy. METHODS: We enrolled 428 naive patients who were randomly assigned to receive either recombinant interferon alpha-2b and ribavirin for 24 weeks or interferon alpha-2b alone for 48 weeks. The primary end-point of the study was the rate of sustained virological response. Serum HCV RNA levels were determined before treatment; during treatment at weeks 12 and 24 in the patients receiving the combination therapy; at weeks 12, 24, 36 and 48 in the patients receiving monotherapy; and after therapy at weeks 12, 24 and 48 in the patients in both study groups. RESULTS: Sustained virological response was observed in 43% of the patients treated with combination therapy and in 14% of the patients treated with monotherapy. Logistic regression analysis showed that sustained response was associated with the combination therapy, with HCV genotype other than 1b, with an HCV viral load of 3x10(6) copies/ml or less, with an inflammation score of 7 or less, and with an estimated duration of disease of 10 years or less. CONCLUSIONS: A 24-week treatment course with interferon alpha-2b and ribavirin offers a greater chance of sustained virological response compared to treatment with interferon alpha-2b alone for 48 weeks, and may be indicated as initial therapy in such patients.     

Treatment of hepatitis C virus: the first decade

Interferon alfa therapy emerged as an early treatment option for patients with chronic hepatitis C. This therapy, however, fails to produce a sustained virological response in most patients. Various host and viral baseline characteristics, some of which include hepatitis C virus genotype, viral load, presence of cirrhosis, and patient age, affect the response to interferon therapy. The addition of ribavirin to interferon therapy significantly improves long-term virological response in treatment-naive patients and is also more effective than repeat interferon therapy is in patients who fail to initially achieve sustained virological or biochemical responses. However, ribavirin can induce reversible hemolytic anemia, and combination therapy with a ribavirin/interferon regimen is not tolerated as well as interferon is alone. Pegylated interferons used alone or in combination with ribavirin provide improved treatment options for different patient groups with chronic hepatitis C.     

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of peginterferon alfa-2a (40KD) plus ribavirin with or without amantadine in treatment-naïve patients with chronic hepatitis C genotype 1 infection

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Amantadine may augment virological response rates to interferon-based therapy in chronic hepatitis C patients. Using a novel design, amantadine was studied in na?ve genotype 1 patients treated in combination with peginterferon alfa-2a (40KD)/ribavirin. METHODS: Patients enrolled in this randomized, placebo-controlled multicenter trial were stratified by single-dose interferon sensitivity (stratum I, 24-h HCV-RNA decline >1.4-log10; II, 0.8-1.39-log10; III, <0.8-log10; a reliable means of identifying nonresponders to interferon/ribavirin) and fibrosis grade (F0/1/2 vs. F3/4) at baseline. All patients received peginterferon alfa-2a (40KD) 180 microg/week plus ribavirin 1000-1200 mg/day and were randomized to receive amantadine 100 mg twice daily (N = 114) or placebo (N = 95) for 48 weeks. RESULTS: Week-24 virological response rates in strata II and III, the primary outcome, were similar in patients treated with amantadine (63.7%) or placebo (65.7%), as were sustained virological response rates at week 72 (46.5 and 51.6%, respectively). Adverse event profiles were similar and amantadine did not improve health-related quality of life compared with placebo. Interferon sensitivity was the only significant predictor of treatment outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Adding amantadine to peginterferon alfa-2a (40KD)/ribavirin combination therapy does not augment virological response rates in genotype 1 patients. Virological response was almost exclusively determined by interferon sensitivity at baseline.     

Interferon and amantadine in naive chronic hepatitis C: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial

Recent controlled trials on the efficacy of an amantadine/interferon combination in treatment-naive patients with chronic hepatitis C yielded contradictory results. We therefore conducted a large, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial in naive patients with chronic hepatitis C: 246 patients were randomized to receive interferon alfa-2a (6 MIU sc thrice weekly for 20 weeks, then 3 MIU sc thrice weekly) and either amantadine sulphate (2 x 100 mg p.o. QD) or placebo. Treatment continued for a total of 52 weeks, if HCV-RNA in serum polymerase chain reaction (PCR) had fallen below detection limit (1,000 copies/mL) at treatment week 10, and stopped otherwise. All patients were followed for 24 weeks off therapy. After 10 weeks of treatment, 66/121 patients treated with amantadine (55%) and 78/125 treated with placebo (62%) had lost HCV-RNA (n.s.). After 24 weeks of follow-up, 25 patients in the amantadine (21%) and 17 (14%) in the placebo group remained HCV-RNA negative (n.s.). During therapy, virologic breakthroughs occurred less often in the amantadine than in the placebo group [14 (12%) vs. 27 (22%) patients; P =.04]. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed genotype, viremia level, age, and amantadine therapy [risk ratio 0.4 (95%CI 0.2-1.0), P =.05] as predictors of sustained virologic response. Adverse events and impact of therapy on quality of life were similar in amantadine and placebo treated patients. Compared with current standard treatment (interferon/ribavirin), the interferon/amantadine combination was not cost-effective. In conclusion, amantadine does not add to a clinically relevant extent to the treatment of naive patients with chronic hepatitis C.     

Treatment of naive patients with chronic hepatitis C

Treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in naive patients with interferon alpha alone or in combination with ribavirin is reviewed. Two placebo-controlled randomised studies including 150 patients have shown that ribavirin as single therapy at standard dosage (15 mg/kg bodyweight in two divided doses daily) only reduces ALT levels transiently during therapy, whereas HCV RNA levels are not substantially reduced. Interferon alpha (IFN) alone at standard dosage (3 MU t.i.w.) given for 12 months results in sustained virological response (SR) rates of some 15-25% depending on the genotype and baseline HCV RNA levels. Ribavirin in combination with alpha interferon, in standard doses for 6-12 months significantly improves the sustained biochemical and virological response rates 2-3 times compared with IFN alone for 12 months. In the future, combination therapy will become standard therapy for most naive patients, at least those with unfavourable viral parameters such as a high baseline viral load (>2-3 million gE/ml serum) and genotype 1a+1b. In patients with favourable baseline viral characteristics (genotypes 2 and 3, irrespective of viral load) 6 months of combination therapy is likely to be sufficient, whereas those with unfavourable viral baseline characteristics will need longer combination treatment. Both genotype and baseline viral load need to be assessed to optimise the choice of therapy. Many questions must still be answered, such as the optimal dose of ribavirin and IFN in combination regimens, and the optimal treatment length. Furthermore, should induction treatment be used in combination regimens? What regimen should be used for patients with more advanced disease such as those with cirrhosis and decompensation?     

Combined interferon α2b and cyclosporin A in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C: controlled trial

Background. Only 15% to 20% of patients with chronic hepatitis C have a sustained virological response to interferon monotherapy. The aim of the present study was to compare the efficacy and safety of interferon, in combination with oral cyclosporin A, with interferon monotherapy in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C. Methods. We assigned 120 patients with chronic hepatitis C to receive the standard Japanese dose of interferon α2b alone for 24 weeks or that dose of interferon α2b in combination with cyclosporin A, at doses of 200 mg daily for the first 4 weeks and 100 mg daily for the following 20 weeks. All patients were assessed for drug safety, tolerance, and efficacy at the end of weeks 4, 12, 24, and 48. Efficacy was assessed by the disappearance of serum hepatitis C virus (HCV)-RNA by polymerase chain reaction and normalization of serum aminotransferase. The primary endpoint was a sustained virological response; i.e., sustained undetectable serum HCV RNA at 48 weeks. Results. The sustained virological response rate was significantly higher in the combination therapy group (42/76) than in the monotherapy group (14/44; P = 0.01). The sustained biochemical response rate was also higher in the combination therapy group (46/76) than in the monotherapy group (17/44; P = 0.017). In patients with genotype 1 and high viral loads, the sustained virological response rate was markedly higher in the combination therapy group (16/38) than in the monotherapy group (1/21; P = 0.006). Side-effect profiles were similar in the two groups. Conclusions. In patients with chronic hepatitis C; combined interferon and cyclosporin A treatment was more effective than interferon monotherapy. The benefit was mostly achieved in patients with a high viral load and HCV genotype 1. Received: March 12, 2002 / Accepted: November 22, 2002 RID="*" ID="*" Reprint requests to: K. Inoue