Low Revision Rates at More Than 10 Years for Dual-Mobility Cups Cemented Into Cages in Complex Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty

BackgroundInstability and aseptic loosening are the two main complications after revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA). Dual-mobility (DM) cups were shown to counteract implant instability during rTHA. To our knowledge, no study evaluated the 10-year outcomes of rTHA using DM cups, cemented into a metal reinforcement ring, in cases of severe acetabular bone loss. We hypothesized that using a DM cup cemented into a metal ring is a reliable technique for rTHA at 10 years, with few revisions for acetabular loosening and/or instability.MethodsThis is a retrospective study of 77 rTHA cases with severe acetabular bone loss (Paprosky ≥ 2C) treated exclusively with a DM cup (NOVAE STICK; Serf, Décines-Charpieu, France) cemented into a cage (Kerboull cross, Burch-Schneider, or ARM rings). Clinical scores and radiological assessments were performed preoperatively and at the last follow-up. The main endpoints were revision surgery for aseptic loosening or recurring dislocation.ResultsWith a mean follow-up of 10.7 years [2.1-16.2], 3 patients were reoperated because of aseptic acetabular loosening (3.9%) at 9.6 years [7-12]. Seven patients (9.45%) dislocated their hip implant, only 1 suffered from chronic instability (1.3%). Cup survivorship was 96.1% at 10 years. No sign of progressive radiolucent lines were found and bone graft integration was satisfactory for 91% of the patients.ConclusionThe use of a DM cup cemented into a metal ring during rTHA with complex acetabular bone loss was associated with low revision rates for either acetabular loosening or chronic instability at 10 years.     

Midterm Survivorship After Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty With a Custom Triflange Acetabular Component

Background

Custom triflange acetabular components are being increasingly used for the reconstruction of Paprosky type IIIB acetabular defects. However, midterm survivorship data are lacking.

Long-Term Results of Cemented Total Hip Arthroplasty in Developmental Dysplasia With Acetabular Bulk Bone Grafts After Improving Operative Techniques

We present the long-term results (mean follow-up, 11.8 years; range, 6.3-15.4 years) of cemented total hip arthroplasty with acetabular bulk bone grafting in 147 dysplastic hips using improved surgical techniques. Operations were performed through a direct lateral approach with partial trochanteric osteotomy to avoid nonunion of the greater trochanter. Bioresorbable poly(l-lactide) screws were used for fixation of the acetabular bone grafts to prevent any possible delayed remodeling. Preoperative planning using computer simulation was performed to estimate the optimal size and position of the acetabular component. Analysis predicted rates of survival of the acetabular component of 96% and 91% at 15 years, with revision for aseptic loosening and radiologic loosening as the end points, respectively. Our results indicate excellent long-term clinical and radiographic survivorship of a cemented acetabular component with bulk autograft for acetabular dysplasia.     

Acetabular Reconstruction With the Medial Protrusio Technique for Complex Primary and Revision Total Hip Arthroplasties

Background

In the setting of acetabular deficiency during total hip arthroplasty (THA), the medial protrusio technique (MPT) allows for increased component coverage while avoiding excessive component abduction or elevation of the hip center. The technique involves controlled reaming through the medial acetabular wall while maintaining the continuity of the anterior and posterior columns. The purpose of this study is to analyze the results of the largest reported series to date of primary and revision THAs using the MPT.

Ceramic Insert Dislodgment After Revision Ceramic-on-Ceramic Total Hip Arthroplasty

We present a case of early ceramic insert dislodgment in a young patient with revision uncemented ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty. The presentation may be subtle and the dislodgment may go unnoticed. This incidence draws our attention to the need for careful intraoperative confirmation of the insert position and frequent serial radiographic monitoring. The case also draws speculation of possible design flaws in the locking mechanism predisposing for the insert dislodgment.     

Comparison of Cemented vs Uncemented Acetabular Component Positioning Using an Imageless Navigation System

Hip navigation was used as an assessment tool to compare ability to reproduce trial and definitive acetabular placement in total hip arthroplasty, using cemented and uncemented components. We demonstrated a significant difference in reproducibility between components. Of 20 uncemented cups, 4 (20%) deviated from the target inclination by 5° or more compared to none of 21 in the cemented group (P = .048). Of the 20 uncemented cups, 7 (35%) deviated from the target version by 5° or more compared to none of 21 in the cemented group (P = .003). This may explain higher rates of revision for dislocation with uncemented components. There was also a significant difference between the groups with regard to deviation from planned leg length (P < .001).     

Long-Term Survivorship of Cemented and Uncemented Polyethylene Liner Exchange

BackgroundRevision surgery is usually required for complications associated with total hip arthroplasty (THA). Significant morbidity can be associated with revision THA and thus some may only revise the liner of the original metal back component if it is found to be well fixed. We compare the long-term survivorship of cemented and uncemented head-liner THA exchange surgeries and possible causes.MethodsBetween 2000 and 2018, we reviewed cases from our arthroplasty database who underwent THA revision for head-liner exchange. We stratified our cohort into 2 groups: cemented and uncemented liners. Patients were followed clinically and radiographically to determine survivorship of the exchanges for both cemented and uncemented liners. Implant survivorship was measured using a competing risk analysis considering death and patients lost to follow-up as competing risks.ResultsA total of 84 patients (85 hips) underwent head-liner exchange surgery during the study period (21 cemented and 64 uncemented liners). The mean follow-up time was 6.9 years, with 75.3% and 24.7% of patients having been revised due to non-dislocation and dislocation causes, respectively. Two cemented liners (9.5%) and 11 uncemented liners (17.2%) required revision. The survival analysis of all head-liner revision was 86.4% at 18 years. Survival estimates liner exchanges due to dislocation versus non-dislocation groups were 57.3% versus 82.7% respectively (P = .034).ConclusionThe present study shows improved survivorship of head-liner exchanges performed due to non-dislocation etiology compared to dislocation etiology, but no difference in survivorship between cemented and uncemented head-liner exchange.Level of EvidenceLevel III.     

Acetabular Revision Arthroplasty Using an Uncemented Deep Profile Jumbo Component: A Ten to Sixteen Year Follow-Up Study

Background

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the outcome of revision total hip arthroplasty using an uncemented deep profile jumbo acetabular component in patients who had been followed for a minimum of 10 years postoperatively.

A Comparative Study Between Uncemented and Hybrid Total Hip Arthroplasty in Octogenarians

Background

The aim of this prospective cohort study is to evaluate the outcome of octogenarian patients undergoing uncemented total hip arthroplasty (THA) with a control group of similarly aged patients undergoing hybrid THA with a minimum 5-year follow-up.

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Non-database Comparative Studies on Cemented Versus Uncemented Femoral Stems in Primary Elective Total Hip Arthroplasty

BackgroundCemented and uncemented femoral stems have shown excellent survivorship and outcomes in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). Cementless stems have become increasingly common in the United States; however, multiple large database studies have suggested that elderly patients may have fewer complications with a cemented stem. As conclusions from large databases may be limited due to variations in data collection, this study investigated femoral stem survivorship and complication rates based on cement status in non-database studies.MethodsPreferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were utilized to identify articles for inclusion up until June 2021. Included articles directly compared outcomes and complications between patients undergoing primary THA without femoral stem cementing to those with cementing. Studies were excluded if they utilized large databases or consisted of patients with a preoperative diagnosis of trauma.ResultsOf the 1700 studies, 309 were selected for abstract review and nineteen for full-text review. A total of seven studies were selected. Meta-analyses indicated substantial heterogeneity between studies. There were no differences in revision rates (cementless: 5.53% vs. cemented 8.91%, P = .543), infection rates (cementless: 0.60% vs. cemented: 0.90%, P = .692), or periprosthetic fracture rates (cementless: 0.52% vs. cemented: 0.51%, P = .973) between groups.ConclusionThere is scarce literature comparing outcomes and complications between cemented and cementless femoral stems in primary elective THA without utilizing a database methodology. In our study, there were no differences in complications detected on meta-analyses. Given previous findings in database studies, additional high-quality cohort studies are required to determine if selected patients may benefit from a cemented femoral stem.     

Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty With a Spongy Metal Surface Acetabular Component for Hip Dysplasia

We evaluated the clinical and radiographic results of primary total hip arthroplasty for 81 dysplastic hips (71 patients) using cementless Spongiosa Metal II cups (ESKA Implants, Lübeck, Germany). The mean follow-up period was 6.4 years (minimum 5 years), and the preoperative mean Japanese Orthopaedic Association hip score had improved from 45.2 to 87.4 points at the latest follow-up. The radiographic outcome was no aseptic loosening in all 81 hips. The hip center was located significantly more superior than in the contralateral normal hip in 45 patients, but the difference was less than 10 mm; however, there was no significant difference in the lateral position of the hip center. The use of a Spongiosa Metal II cup for dysplastic hips provided satisfactory 5- to 10-year clinical and radiographic results.     

Acetabulum-Only Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Is Associated With Good Functional Outcomes and Survivorship

Background

The coexistence of a stable femoral and a loose acetabular component may pose a clinical dilemma for the surgeon. Our study aims at comparing the intermediate functional outcomes and survivorship of acetabulum-only revision total hip arthroplasty (ArTHA) with an age-matched and gender-matched total revision THA (TrTHA) group.

Intermediate- to Long-Term Results After Hybrid Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis

There have been few reports describing intermediate- to long-term results after hybrid total hip arthroplasty in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. We followed up 52 hips in 44 patients aged 5 men and 39 women, with a mean of 11.5 years (range, 5-23.5 years). Revisions had been performed in 6 hips in 6 patients: 1 both acetabular and femoral components for infection, 1 acetabular component for aseptic loosening, 3 acetabular components for recurrent dislocation, and 1 acetabular component for dislodgement of the polyethylene liner from the metal shell. None of other acetabular or femoral components were revised or found to be loose at the final follow-up. Although postoperative dislocation remains a concern, hybrid total hip arthroplasty had an acceptable result in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.     

Mortality After Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty

BackgroundIn counseling patients about the complications of revision total hip arthroplasty (revTHA), it is imperative that mortality be considered. The actual mortality rate by indication of revision is ill-defined. The purpose of this study is to determine the mortality rate after revTHA.MethodsAn institutional database identified 596 patients who had undergone revTHA between 2012 and 2018. Medical records, national, state, and local death indexes were queried for mortality status and indication for revTHA. For survivors, the last clinical visit date was used for censoring in the mortality analysis. Mortality rates were calculated for all clinical patients and then by specific indication for revision.ResultsThe overall 2-year mortality rate following revTHA was 19.5 deaths per 1000 or 1 in 51 patients. Patients presenting with a periprosthetic fracture had a significantly higher 2-year mortality rate of 74.5 deaths per 1000 or 1 in 13 patients (P < .001), while an indication of dislocation or instability had a slightly higher 2-year mortality rate of 50.3 per 1000 (1 in 20) but this difference was not significant (P = .531). Other indications such as mechanical loosening or infection did not have a significantly different mortality rate.ConclusionThe overall 2-year mortality rate following revTHA was 19.5 deaths per 1000 which was largely attributed to patients with a periprosthetic fracture (74.5 per 1000) with other indications not significantly impacting mortality. Mortality rates and specific rates by indication for revision should be considered when counseling patients prior to revTHA.     

Acetabular Total Hip Arthroplasty Revision: A Summary of Operative Factors,Outcomes, and Comparison of Approaches

BackgroundRevision total hip arthroplasty (THA) presents a greater risk to patients than primary THA, and surgical approach may impact outcomes. This study aimed to summarize acetabular revisions at our institution and to compare outcomes between direct anterior and posterior revision THA.MethodsA series of 379 acetabular revision THAs performed from January 2010 through August 2022 was retrospectively reviewed. Preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative factors were summarized for all revisions and compared between direct anterior and posterior revision THA.ResultsThe average time to acetabular revision THA was 10 years (range, 0.04 to 44.1), with mechanical failure (36.7%) and metallosis (25.6%) being the most prevalent reasons for revision. No differences in age, body mass index, or sex were noted between groups. Anterior revision patients had a significantly shorter length of stay (2.2 versus 3.2 days, P = .003) and rate of discharge to a skilled nursing facility (7.5 versus 25.2%, P = .008). In the 90-day postoperative period, 9.2% of patients returned to the emergency department (n = 35) and twelve patients (3.2%) experienced a dislocation. There were 13.2% (n = 50) of patients having a rerevision during the follow-up period with a significant difference between anterior and posterior approaches (3.8 versus 14.7%, respectively, P = .049).ConclusionThis study provides some evidence that the anterior approach may be protective against skilled nursing facility discharge and rerevision and contributes to decreased lengths of stay. We recommend surgeons select the surgical approach for revision THA based on clinical preferences and patient factors.     

Total Hip Arthroplasty After Hip Arthroscopy Has Increased Complications and Revision Risk

BackgroundThere has been an increase in hip arthroscopy (HA) over the last decade. After HA, some patients may ultimately require a total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, there is a scarcity of research investigating the outcomes in patients undergoing THA with a history of ipsilateral HA.MethodsThe PearlDiver research program (www.pearldiverinc.com) was queried to capture all patients undergoing THA between 2015 and 2020. Propensity matching was performed to match patients undergoing THA with and without a history of ipsilateral THA. Rates of 30-day medical complications, 1-year surgical complications, and THA revision were compared using multivariate logistic regression. Kaplan-Meier analysis was conducted to estimate survival probabilities of each of the groups with patients undergoing THA .ResultsAfter propensity matching, cohorts of 1940 patients undergoing THA without prior HA and 1940 patients undergoing a THA with prior HA were isolated for analysis. The mean time from HA to THA was 1127 days (standard deviation 858). Patients with a history of ipsilateral HA had an increased risk for dislocation (odds ratio [OR] 1.56, P = .03) and overall decreased implant survival within 4 years of undergoing THA (OR 1.53; P = .05). Furthermore, our data demonstrate the timing of previous HA to be associated with the risk of complications, as illustrated by the increased risk for dislocation (OR 1.75, P = .03), aseptic loosening (OR 2.18, P = .03), and revision surgery at 2 (OR 1.92, P = .02) and 4 years (OR 2.05, P = .01) in patients undergoing THA within 1 year of HA compared twitho patients undergoing THA more than 1 year after HA or with no previous history of HA.ConclusionPatients undergoing THA after HA are at an increased risk for surgical complications, as well as the need for revision surgery.     

全髋关节置换治疗髋关节发育不全

目的：研究全髋关节置换治疗髋关节发育不全（ＤＤＨ）的外科技术。方法：４７例（５４髋）因髋关节发育不全引起严重骨性关节炎的患者行全髋关节置换治疗，其中男８例，女３９例。随访１２个月～１４年，平均５３个月。结果：根据ＭｅｒｌｅＤ＇Ａｕｂｉｇｎｅ评分方法，优８例（１７～１８分）、良３０例（１３～１６分）、中８例（９～１２分）、差１例（＜８分）。结论：根据髋关节脱位的程度可将髋关节发育不全分成四度，其中Ⅰ度、Ⅱ度为半脱位型；Ⅲ度、Ⅳ度为全脱位型。ＤＤＨⅠ度，即低位半脱位，髋臼加深为其手术要点；ＤＤＨⅡ度，即高位半脱位，通过上移髋臼假体可以避免植骨；对于ＤＤＨⅢ度、Ⅳ度则使用小型髋臼假体并且植骨。我们提出的分类方法较Ｃｒｏｗｅ方法简便且实用，特别是对髋臼的处理有指导意义。对髋关节发育不全进行全髋关节置换应严格掌握适应证，只有当疼痛和功能障碍非常明显而保守治疗无明确效果时采用     

Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using the Kerboull Acetabular Reinforcement Device and Structural Allograft for Severe Defects of the Acetabulum

Background

The purpose of this study is to review our experience with Kerboull reinforcement device combined with bulk allograft for management of severe acetabular defects.

Standard Versus Custom-Made Acetabular Implants in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty

BackgroundToday, various options are used for the reconstruction of acetabular bone loss in revision total hip arthroplasty (RTHA). The aim of the study was to compare the outcomes of using standard acetabular implants (SAIs) and custom-made acetabular implants (CMAIs) in RTHA in cases with extensive acetabular bone loss.MethodsThis was a comparative analysis of the results of 106 operations of RTHA performed during the period from January 2013 to December 2019. In 61 cases (57.5%), CMAIs were used. In 45 cases (42.5%), SAIs were implanted.ResultsThe incidence of aseptic loosening of the acetabular component after RTHA in uncontained loss of bone stock of the acetabulum (type III-IV as per the Gross and Saleh classification) using the CMAI was less than that using the SAI (2.4% and 10.0%, respectively). The most significant differences in aseptic loosening rates were noted after implantation of the CMAI and SAI in pelvic discontinuity with uncontained bone defect (0% and 60.0%, respectively; P < .001).ConclusionThe ideal indications for the use of the CMAI are uncontained defects and pelvic discontinuity with uncontained loss of bone stock (types III-V Gross and Saleh classification). Treatment of these defects with the SAI leads to a higher incidence of aseptic loosening requiring re-revisions. Further observation is required to assess the effectiveness of using the CMAI and SAI in the long-term follow-up period.     

Survivorship and Clinical Outcomes of Custom Triflange Acetabular Components in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review

BackgroundSeveral studies have evaluated the survivorship and clinical outcomes of custom triflange acetabular component (CTAC) usage in complex acetabular revision; however, there remains no consensus on the overall performance of this custom implant design. We therefore performed a systematic review of the literature in order to examine survivorship and complication rate of CTAC usage.MethodsA systematic review of the literature according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines was performed. A comprehensive search of PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews was conducted for English articles using various combinations of the keywords “custom triflange,” “custom-made triflange,” “acetabular triflange,” “THA,” “THR,” “revision,” “bone loss,” “bone defect,” and “pelvic discontinuity.”ResultsIn all, 17 articles met our inclusion criteria. A total of 579 CTACs were implanted. The all-cause revision-free survivorship was 82.7%. The overall complication rate was 29%. Dislocation and infection were the most common complications observed with an incidence of 11% and 6.2%, respectively. Nerve injuries following CTAC placement had an incidence of 3.8%. The incidence of CTAC aseptic loosening was 1.7%. Overall, patients had improved outcomes as documented by postoperative hip scores.ConclusionBased on the current data, CTACs have a high complication rate but remain an efficacious treatment option in complex acetabular reconstructions. When dealing with patients with significant acetabular bone loss for revision total hip arthroplasty, surgeons should continue to consider CTACs as a viable option but educate patients as to the increased risk of postoperative complications and reoperations.