Comparison between sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors and pioglitazone as additions to insulin therapy in type 2 diabetes patients: A systematic review with an indirect comparison meta‐analysis

Aims/Introduction

We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pioglitazone (PIO) and sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) as additions to insulin therapy for the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Materials and Methods

We searched PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and ClinicalTrials.gov through December 2016. Randomized controlled trials published in English that compared SGLT2i plus insulin (SGLT2i/INS) or PIO plus insulin (PIO/INS) with placebo plus insulin (PCB/INS) in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients were included. We compared the efficacy and safety between SGLT2i/INS and PIO/INS indirectly.

Results

A total of 14 randomized controlled trials comparing 7,226 participants were included (8 SGLT2i and 6 PIO studies). SGLT2i/INS achieved similar reductions in hemoglobin A1c (weighted mean difference [WMD] ?0.01% [?0.1 mmol/mol], 95% confidence interval [CI] ?0.25 to 0.22% [?2.7 to ?2.4 mmol/mol]; P = 0.896) and fasting plasma glucose (WMD ?0.90 mg/dL, 95% CI: ?15.50 to 13.71 mg/dL; P = 0.904), and a similar proportion of participants achieved hemoglobin A1c <7.0% (<53.0 mmol/mol; relative risk 0.98, 95% CI: 0.73 to 1.33; P = 0.917) as compared with the PIO/INS group, with greater weight reduction (WMD ?4.54 kg, 95% CI: ?5.67 to ?3.41 kg; P < 0.001). PIO/INS showed non‐significant trends toward a higher risk of hypoglycemia (relative risk 1.15, 95% CI: 0.97 to 1.35; P = 0.102) and higher reduction of total daily insulin doses (WMD ?2.45 IU/day, 95% CI: ?7.30 to 2.40 IU/day; P = 0.438).

Conclusions

Both PIO and SGLT2i are feasible adjunctive oral agents to pre‐existing insulin therapy in individuals with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus.

     

Use of sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors in older patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Aim

Sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are antidiabetic agents that act on the proximal renal tubules to lower blood glucose levels by inhibiting glucose reabsorption and promoting urinary glucose excretion. The present study assessed the long‐term use of SGLT2 inhibitors in older patients with diabetes.

Methods

A total of 117 older patients with type 2 diabetes who were given SGLT2 inhibitors were enrolled from April 2014 to March 2016.

Results

The mean age of the patients was 73.7 ± 10.0 years. During the follow‐up period (mean 289.3 days), there was no event associated with oral administration of SGLT2 inhibitors. These drugs significantly lowered fasting blood glucose and glycosylated hemoglobin levels at 6 months, and did not affect the creatinine level, blood urea nitrogen/creatinine ratio or estimated glomerular filtration rate during treatment. Although the treatment significantly increased hemoglobin and hematocrit levels, it did not affect the ultrasonographically determined diameter of the inferior vena cava, and no signs of intravascular collapse were observed. Changes in brain natriuretic peptide levels during the follow‐up period were assessed in 78 patients with a brain natriuretic peptide level exceeding the normal upper limit before treatment with SGLT2 inhibitors. The brain natriuretic peptide levels significantly decreased after 6 months of treatment.

Conclusions

In older Japanese patients with diabetes, treatment with SGLT2 inhibitors for 6 months exerted a favorable hypoglycemic effect, while no sign of dehydration was observed. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2018; 18: 108–114 .     

Metabolic and hemodynamic effects of sodium‐dependent glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors on cardio‐renal protection in the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

The specific sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2 inhibitors) inhibit glucose reabsorption in proximal renal tubular cells, and both fasting and postprandial glucose significantly decrease because of urinary glucose loss. As a result, pancreatic β‐cell function and peripheral insulin action significantly improve with relief from glucose toxicity. Furthermore, whole‐body energy metabolism changes to relative glucose deficiency and triggers increased lipolysis in fat cells, and fatty acid oxidation and then ketone body production in the liver during treatment with SGLT2 inhibitors. In addition, SGLT2 inhibitors have profound hemodynamic effects including diuresis, dehydration, weight loss and lowering blood pressure. The most recent findings on SGLT2 inhibitors come from results of the Empagliflozin, Cardiovascular Outcomes and Mortality in Type 2 Diabetes trial. SGLT2 inhibitors exert extremely unique and cardio‐renal protection through metabolic and hemodynamic effects, with long‐term durability on the reduction of blood glucose, bodyweight and blood pressure. Although a site of action of SGLT2 inhibitors is highly specific to inhibit renal glucose reabsorption, whole‐body energy metabolism, and hemodynamic and renal functions are profoundly modulated during the treatment of SGLT2 inhibitors. Previous studies suggest multifactorial clinical benefits and safety concerns of SGLT2 inhibitors. Although ambivalent clinical results of this drug are still under active discussion, the present review summarizes promising recent evidence on the cardio‐renal and metabolic benefits of SGLT2 inhibitors in the treatment of type 2 diabetes.     

Use of sodium–glucose co‐transporter‐2 inhibitors in patients with and without type 2 diabetes: implications for incident and prevalent heart failure

Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is associated with an increased risk of heart failure (HF), with recent reports indicating that HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) may be more common than HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) in patients with T2D. T2D and HF result in worse outcomes than either disease alone. Sodium–glucose co‐transporter‐2 inhibitors (SGLT‐2is) have significantly improved HF outcomes in patients with T2D and may represent a new therapeutic alternative for patients with T2D at risk for or with HF. Current guidelines recommend prevention of HF through risk factor management. Once developed, treatment of HFrEF should include neurohormonal and haemodynamic modulations; however, there are no specific treatments available for HFpEF. SGLT‐2is are the first class of glucose‐lowering therapy to prevent HF in clinical trials and real‐world studies in patients with T2D (with or without established cardiovascular disease and with or without baseline HF). Mechanistic studies suggest that SGLT‐2is have beneficial effects on both systolic and diastolic function and additional systemic effects that could benefit HF outcomes. In patients with HFrEF, SGLT‐2i treatment as add‐on to standard HF therapy has had beneficial effects on HF outcomes, irrespective of T2D status. These results and those of ongoing outcomes trials with SGLT‐2is may help establish this drug class as a treatment for HF in patients with HFrEF and HFpEF, as well as HF in patients without T2D.     

Switching from low‐dose thiazide diuretics to sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor improves various metabolic parameters without affecting blood pressure in patients with type 2 diabetes and hypertension

Aims/Introduction

Sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors function to increase urinary glucose excretion and improve glycemic control in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus. SGLT2 inhibitors, as well as diuretics, increase urinary volume, which leads to the reduction of blood pressure. The aim of the present study was to compare the effects of SGLT2 inhibitor and thiazide diuretic on blood pressure, metabolic parameters and body mass composition.

Materials and Methods

A total of 31 participants were enrolled in the present study. We switched from thiazide diuretics to an SGLT2 inhibitor, ipragliflozin, in participants with type 2 diabetes and hypertension whose blood pressure was controlled with thiazide diuretics. Three months after the switch, we evaluated the effects of such switching on blood pressure, various metabolic parameters and body mass composition.

Results

There was no significant difference in blood pressure from baseline to 3 months later. However, glycated hemoglobin, fasting plasma glucose and uric acid were significantly decreased after the switch. Body mass index and visceral fat area were also significantly reduced after the switch. Furthermore, urinary albumin excretion was also significantly decreased after the switch.

Conclusions

Switching from thiazide diuretic to an SGLT2 inhibitor, ipragliflozin, markedly improved various metabolic parameters and body mass composition without affecting blood pressure in participants with type 2 diabetes and hypertension.     

Renal threshold for glucose reabsorption predicts diabetes improvement by sodium‐glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor therapy

In the present study we examined the efficacy of sodium‐glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors on improvement of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) in comparison with the renal threshold for glucose reabsorption in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Patients visited the hospital once a month for a regular follow‐up examination with the determination of blood glucose and HbA1c levels, and urinary glucose concentration from spot urine samples. Patient samples were compared before and after ipragliflozin administration. We defined the renal threshold for glucose reabsorption as the lowest blood glucose level that correlated with the first detectable appearance of urine glucose. These data showed a significant negative correlation between improvement of HbA1c level and renal threshold for glucose reabsorption in patients treated with the sodium‐glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor. These findings show that patients who have a higher renal threshold for glucose reabsorption can be expected to more effectively respond to sodium‐glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor therapy in terms of lowering HbA1c levels.     

Sodium–glucose cotransporter inhibition: therapeutic potential for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus

Results from randomized controlled trials have demonstrated that the risk of microvascular complications can be reduced by intensive glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). However, only about half of patients with diagnosed diabetes achieve recommended glycaemic goals. New therapies with complementary mechanisms of action that are independent of insulin secretion or action may provide additional therapeutic options to enable patients to achieve glycaemic control. The kidney plays an important role in glucose homeostasis, primarily by the reabsorption of filtered glucose. The sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2), located in the proximal convoluted tubule, is responsible for the majority of glucose reabsorption by the kidney. SGLT2 inhibitors offer a novel approach to treat T2DM and reduce hyperglycaemia by increasing urinary excretion of glucose. Dapagliflozin, an SGLT2 inhibitor recently approved in Europe for the treatment of T2DM, improves glycaemic control in patients with T2DM when used as monotherapy or when added to other diabetes medications, such as metformin, sulfonylureas, pioglitazone, and insulin. As a class, SGLT2 inhibitors are well tolerated and have a low propensity to cause hypoglycaemia. An increase in signs, symptoms, and other events suggestive of genital and, in some studies, urinary tract infections has been reported with SGLT2 inhibitors. Results from ongoing and future clinical trials will help define the role for this new class of investigational compounds, with its unique mechanism of action, as a treatment option for reducing hyperglycaemia in patients with T2DM. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin alone or as add‐on to other oral antihyperglycemic drugs in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes: A 52‐week open‐label study

Aims/Introduction

Canagliflozin is a sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor under development for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Our aim was to examine its efficacy and safety as monotherapy or in combination with commonly used oral antihyperglycemic drugs in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes.

Materials and Methods

Patients on diet/exercise alone or diet/exercise plus an oral antihyperglycemic drug (sulfonylurea, glinide, α-glucosidase inhibitor, biguanide, thiazolidinedione or dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor) were randomized to either 100 or 200 mg canagliflozin while continuing prior therapy. Patients were treated for 52 weeks in an open-label manner.

Results

Canagliflozin significantly reduced hemoglobin A1c, fasting plasma glucose and bodyweight in all the study groups. Improvements were apparent by 4 weeks of treatment, and were maintained for 52 weeks. The reduction in hemoglobin A1c ranged from −0.80 to −1.06%, and from −0.93 to −1.26% in the 100 and 200 mg canagliflozin groups, respectively. Drug-related adverse events occurred in approximately one-third of patients, and included hypoglycemia/asymptomatic hypoglycemia and pollakiuria. Hypoglycemia/asymptomatic hypoglycemia was most common in patients treated with a sulfonylurea. Most adverse events were classified as mild or moderate in severity.

Conclusions

The results of the present study confirmed that treatment with canagliflozin resulted in significant reductions in glycemic control and bodyweight that were maintained for 52 weeks of treatment irrespective of whether it was administered as monotherapy or in combination with another oral antihyperglycemic drug. Canagliflozin was well tolerated, with a low incidence of drug-related adverse events. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (no. {"type":"clinical-trial","attrs":{"text":"NCT01387737","term_id":"NCT01387737"}}NCT01387737).     

Effects of sodium‐glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors on risk of venous thromboembolism in patients with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

It has been reported that sodium‐glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors could increase blood viscosity, which may further increase risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Therefore, we conducted this meta‐analysis to evaluate the association between SGLT2 inhibitors and risk of VTE in patients with type 2 diabetes. We systematically searched electronic databases up to April 2019 to identify randomized trials that reported the events of VTE in SGLT2 inhibitors group and control group (placebo or other active antidiabetic drugs). The primary outcome was VTE, and secondary outcomes included deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE). A fixed‐effects meta‐analysis was performed to calculate the risk ratio (RR) with 95% CI. In total, 29 randomized trials involving 56 035 patients with type 2 diabetes were included. Incidence of VTE was not significantly different between SGLT2 inhibitors group and control group (128/32 038 vs 92/23 997), yielding an RR of 0.98 (95% CI, 0.75‐1.28). Similarly, null associations were observed in the subgroup analyses. Our cumulative meta‐analysis demonstrated the stability of our overall result over time. There was no significant association between SGLT2 inhibitors and risk of both DVT (17 trials; 31/17 442 vs 15/10 930; RR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.60‐1.89) and PE (19 trials; 56/26 118 vs 41/19 517; RR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.67‐1.46). Low statistical heterogeneity and no evidence of publication bias were observed. Current evidence from randomized trials found no association between SGLT2 inhibitors and risk of VTE among patients with type 2 diabetes.