Long-term follow-up of blood donors with indeterminate human immunodeficiency virus type 1 results on Western blot

BACKGROUND: At present, tens of thousands of United States blood donors who are at low risk for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection are indefinitely deferred. These persons are repeatably reactive for HIV-1 antibody in enzyme immunoassay (EIA) and are indeterminate in Western blot. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: To determine the significance and persistence of anti-HIV-1 reactivity in plasma from volunteer blood donors with HIV-1-indeterminate Western blots, 66 donors were retested for HIV-1 antibody by the same manufacturers' EIA and Western blot 5 to 7 years after the initial Western blot. In addition, donors' peripheral blood mononuclear cells were tested by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for HIV-1 DNA gag sequences. RESULTS: Thirty-five (53%) of 66 donors were still repeatedly reactive for HIV-1 on EIA and indeterminate on Western blot, 23 (35%) were negative on EIA and indeterminate on Western blot, 7 (11%) were negative in EIA and Western blot, and 1 (2%) was repeatedly reactive on EIA and negative on Western blot. Donors with persistently indeterminate Western blots had a band pattern nearly identical to that on the original Western blot. No donor was positive in Western blot, p24 antigen, or PCR testing. No donor had signs or symptoms of HIV-1 infection. CONCLUSION: Long-term follow-up of Western blot-indeterminate blood donors does not reveal evidence of HIV-infection. A mechanism to return these donors to the donor pool should be considered.     

Validation of a new immunoblot assay (LiaTek HIV III) for confirmation of human immunodeficiency virus infection

BACKGROUND: Used as a supplemental assay, new anti-human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) immunoblots, employing recombinant and synthetic antigens, appeared to resolve the majority of samples with false-reactive Western blot results. Would it be possible to completely replace the Western blot by an immunoblot for confirmation and exclusion of HIV infection? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The sensitivity of the new LiaTek HIV III immunoblot assay (Organon Teknika, Turnhout, Belgium) was tested on 416 Western-blot positive samples (386 HIV-1, 22 HIV-2, 1 HIV-1/2, and 7 HIV-O) and on 45 HIV-1 seroconversion samples. The specificity was tested on 146 samples from noninfected donors with false-positive results on a HIV screening test. RESULTS: All Western- blot-positive samples tested positive in the immunoblot (sensitivity: 100%). The immunoblot could not discriminate between HIV-1 and HIV-2 infection in 22 of 416 (5%) samples. The LiaTek assay showed reactivity in 28 of 45 seroconversion samples, whereas the Western blot reacted in 30 of 45 seroconversion samples. With false-positive donor samples, the immunoblot was indeterminate in 10 of 146 samples (specificity: 93%), and the Western blot was indeterminate in 44 of 146 samples (specificity: 70%). CONCLUSION: Like the Western blot, the immunoblot runs the risk of missing samples that are reactive by enzyme immunoassay during the early stage of HIV infection. Nevertheless, considering its superior specificity on false-positive donor samples, it appears that the immunoblot offers a cost-effective alternative to the Western blot assay for confirmation and exclusion of HIV infection.     

Frequency of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection among contemporary anti-HIV-1 and anti-HIV-1/2 supplemental test- indeterminate blood donors. The Retrovirus Epidemiology Donor Study

Background: Follow-up studies from the mid-1980s showed that 1 to 5 percent of blood donors testing reactive in anti-human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) enzyme immunoassay (EIA) and testing indeterminate in Western blot were infected with HIV-1 and were in the process of seroconverting. The present study was conducted to establish the rate of HIV infection among contemporary anti-HIV-1/HIV type 2 (HIV-2) EIA- reactive, Western blot-indeterminate donors. Study Design and Methods: Donations (n = 607) with indeterminate HIV supplemental test results were identified by screening 3,021,342 donations given from November 1990 through August 1993 at five participating blood centers. Consenting donors were enrolled and samples taken 4 to 8 weeks after donation. Follow-up sera were tested by EIA and Western blot for anti- HIV-1 seroconversion and by type-specific peptide assays for antibodies to HIV-2 and HIV-1 subtype O. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells and/or plasma from the follow-up samples were tested for HIV-1 DNA and/or RNA by polymerase chain reaction. The rate of HIV-1 infection among Western blot-indeterminate donors was also estimated by multiplying the incidence rate of HIV-1 seroconversion in this donor population by the estimated duration of the EIA-reactive and Western blot-indeterminate window during seroconversion (8.5 days). Results: Supplemental test- indeterminate donors (n = 355) enrolled a median of 38 days after donation; 265 (75%) of these donors were identified as indeterminate after an anti-HIV-1/2 EIA-reactive donation. Enrolled and non-enrolled donors had similar distributions of demographic characteristics and band patterns. Follow-up samples from all 355 donors tested negative for HIV-1 in polymerase chain reaction. Follow-up sera tested Western blot-negative in 54 cases (15%) and Western blot-indeterminate in 299 (84%). Two follow-up sera (0.6%) were interpreted, according to manufacturer's package insert criteria, as Western blot positive with p24 and gp41 bands and/or gp120/160 bands; however, paired testing of index and follow-up sera from these two cases showed identical Western blot and EIA reactivity, and polymerase chain reaction was negative for HIV RNA and DNA, which ruled out HIV infection. The absence of HIV infection in 355 Western blot-indeterminate donors was consistent with our incidence-based model analysis, which yielded an estimate of one HIV-1 infection for every 215 Western blot-indeterminate donations (95% CI, 1/39-1/8333). Conclusion: Contemporary blood donors classified as indeterminate in supplemental HIV testing are infrequently infected with HIV. Donors whose follow-up samples test negative in anti-HIV-1/2 EIAs and negative or persistently indeterminate in Western blots should be considered eligible for reinstatement.     

Deferred donor care in a regional hospital blood center in Ghana

BACKGROUND: In sub-Saharan Africa, the viral marker burden in blood donor populations ranges between 10 and 30 percent. Deferred donors constitute a rare population of asymptomatic human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)- and hepatitis B virus (HBV)-infected individuals with high likelihood of long survival if cared for. Deferred donor care provides an opportunity for a public health impact on highly pathogenic infections.
STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Between 2004 and 2007, all candidate donors deferred before donation for reactivity of anti-HIV, hepatitis C virus antibody (anti-HCV), and hepatitis B virus surface antigen (HBsAg) rapid tests were informed and referred to a donor care program consisting of test confirmation, information, counseling, and potential referral for follow-up and therapy. Dedicated trained nurses supervised the program including alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level testing to identify liver disease.
RESULTS: In a 4-year period 51,100 donors were screened and 5778, 1578, and 227 candidate donors were deferred for reactivity to HBV, HIV, or HCV serologic markers, respectively. The rates of entry into the donor care program were 48, 14.3, and 22 percent of deferred donors, respectively. A total of 83 of 210 HBsAg-positive donors with elevated ALT levels were referred and 66 received antiviral treatment. A total of 89 of 516 confirmed anti-HIV–positive donors were referred to the hospital acquired immune deficiency syndrome clinic for follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: With little additional expense, the deferred donor care program identified asymptomatic infections with high odds of benefiting from monitoring and therapy. In the local circumstances, this public health–limited but definite impact was permitted by the rapid-test predonation screening, and this impact could be increased if more resources were available.     

Limited effectiveness of donor deferral registries for transfusion-transmitted disease markers

BACKGROUND: Donor deferral registries (DDRs) detect repeat donations by previously deferred donors and prevent their release. The utility of DDRs has not been objectively demonstrated. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 10.2 million first-time donors to the American Red Cross from 1995 through 2002 were reviewed to identify donors deferred by screening tests for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV; 0.19% of donors), hepatitis C virus (HCV; 0.55%), and hepatitis B virus (HBV; 0.13%). All repeat-reactive (RR) donors were deferred despite confirmatory testing. Donors were notified and counseled about their test results and deferral. Their subsequent donation behavior was assessed. RESULTS: A total of 414 HIV-deferred donors (2.1%), 471 HCV-deferred donors (0.8%, p < 0.001 vs. HIV and HBV), and 222 HBV-deferred donors (1.6%, p < 0.01 vs. HIV) returned to donate despite their deferred status. For all three tests, confirmed-positive donors were less likely to return. Of donors originally confirmed positive, only 7 returning donors were negative by screening (thus the repeat donation interdicted from distribution by the DDR): 0 HIV RR donors, 2 of 36,092 HCV RR donors, and 5 of 8,404 HBV RR donors. Review of the laboratory results for the HCV donors and one HBV donor was consistent with originally false-positive confirmation tests. The four other HBV confirmed-positive donors were anti-hepatitis B core antigen-positive on their subsequent donation, which was discarded despite the DDR. CONCLUSION: Of 10.2 million donors, the DDR did not prevent the release of any potentially dangerous blood component due to inappropriate return of donors deferred for HIV, HCV, and HBV tests. The effectiveness of DDRs should be evaluated for other deferrals.     

False-positive human immunodeficiency virus type 1 western blot tests in noninfected blood donors

Background: The manufacturers' criteria for a positive human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) Western blot (WB) test were recently revised to require reactivity to only two of the following bands: p24, gp41, and gp120/160. In a recent report, low-risk blood donors were identified in whom nonspecific reactivity to multiple env antigens in WB testing resulted in apparently false-positive WBs by these criteria. The present study was conducted to verify the existence of false-positive WBs among noninfected donors and to assess the extent of this problem. Study Design and Methods: Four donors classified as WB- positive on the basis of env-only (3 cases) or p24/env-only (1 case) patterns were investigated. Index and/or follow-up specimens were tested by polymerase chain reaction (PCR), by overlapping recombinant env antigens and synthetic peptides in enzyme immunoassays, and by deglycosylated and denatured antigen WBs. WB records from American Red Cross blood centers were reviewed to determine the frequency of env- only and p24/env-only patterns, relative to all positive WBs, from 1988 through 1993. Results: The four index-case donors denied risk and had stable WB reactivity during follow-up. HIV PCR was negative in all. Env reactivity was restricted to nonglycosylated gp41 epitopes; no gp120- specific reactivity was detected. For three of the four donors, env reactivity was mapped to a 20-amino acid N-terminal epitope of gp41. The rate of detecting WBs with these false-positive patterns increased from 0.6 percent of all positive WBs from 1988 to 1990 (4/776) to 8 percent in 1991 and 1992 (52/683), and then it declined to 6 percent in 1992 and 1993 (47/783). Env-only patterns predominated in 1991 and 1992, whereas p24/env-only patterns were more frequent following implementation of combined anti-HIV-1/HIV type 2 enzyme immunoassays in 1992. Conclusion: Low-risk blood donors can have false-positive results on WB tests. Increased detection of env-only and p24/env-only WBs appears related to the enhanced sensitivity of newer enzyme immunoassays to gp41 and p24 antibodies. Donors with these patterns should undergo follow-up testing to document the presence or absence of HIV infection.     

Surveillance of HIV-1 genetic subtypesand diversity in the US blood supply

BACKGROUND: Recent reports of variant (non-subtype B) HIV infections in US populations have raised concerns about the sensitivity of subtype B virus-based donor screening and diagnostic assays. This study was designed to determine the prevalence and genetic diversity of HIV subtypes in US blood donors over the last two decades. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Three groups were studied: hemophiliacs infected by clotting factor concentrates in the early 1980s (n = 49), blood donors retrospectively identified as being seropositive in 1985 (n = 97), and blood donors identified as seropositive between 1993 and 1996 (n = 405). Subtype assignment was based primarily on heteroduplex mobility analysis (HMA) of HIV-1 env, with DNA sequence confirmation of selected specimens. HIV peptide-based EIA serotyping was used to rule out HIV-2 and group O infections and to serotype HMA-refractory specimens. RESULTS: Of 551 specimens, 535 (97%) were assigned subtypes; 532 (99%) of these were subtype B. Three postscreening donations (1%) were assigned non-B subtypes (2 A, 1 C). Two of these three donors were born in Africa; the third was born in the United States and reported no risk factors other than heterosexual activity. HMA distribution plots showed an increase in env diversity among HIV-1 group B strains over time. CONCLUSION: The results support the need for continued surveillance of HIV subtype diversity and ongoing validation of the sensitivity of HIV diagnostic assays to non-B subtype infections.     

Impact of changes in viral marker screening assays

BACKGROUND: Monitoring the performance of routinely used infectious disease serologic tests is necessary to evaluate their effectiveness in identifying true-positive units and erroneously disqualifying safe blood donors. METHODS: With two large screening test data sets collected between 1991 and 1998 and between 1997 and 2000, the impact of changes in screening assays for HIV, HCV, and HBsAg was analyzed with regard to the prevalence of confirmed-positive, indeterminate, and confirmed-negative results and the deferral of donors with an indeterminate or negative results (donor loss). RESULTS: The prevalence of indeterminate results and donors loss increased significantly in the 6 months after introduction of an HIV-1/2 EIA. A second-generation HCV EIA increased the detection of confirmed-positive donations in repeat donors (p < 0.001) and increased the prevalence of indeterminate donations. Implementation of a third-generation HCV EIA resulted in a significant decrease in indeterminate results in first-time donors. Nonspecific test results increased when HBsAg test kits from a different manufacturer were introduced or different lots of HIV antibody screening test kits from the same manufacturer were used. CONCLUSION: Introduction of newly licensed versions of assays, switching kit manufacturers, and lot-to-lot variations have an impact on rates of deferrals of safe donors as well as sensitivity of routine screening. Before considering changes in screening tests, blood centers should be aware of, and evaluate, the potential impact on donor loss.     

我国5城市合格献血者血液HIV及HCV残余风险研究

目的研究我国献血者血液HIV及HCV残余风险;评估我国开展血液核酸检测(NAT)的可行性和必要性。方法采集乌鲁木齐、昆明、北京、广州、杭州5城市献血者血样,用Chiron Procleix HIV-1/HCV Assay血液核酸检测体系,对各项血清学筛查均合格的89 467份血液作16人份混合血样NAT检测,凡筛查不合格血样再作单人份检测;对于抗-HCV阴性而HCV RNA NAT阳性者,用备用管作抗-HCV、ALT、及HCV RNA NAT复检。结果共检出HCV RNA NAT阳性但抗-HCV EIA阴性标本3例,未检出HIV RNA NAT阳性但抗-HIV EIA阴性标本;在87 034份血清学筛查合格献血者中,检出HCV NAT阳性2例,其中1例复检ALT为254U/L,未检出HIVNAT阳性;在2 613份血清学筛查不合格者中,检出1例HCV NAT阳性但抗-HCV EIA阴性标本,该献血者抗-HIV阳性、ALT 372U/L;未检出HIV NAT阳性但抗-HIV EIA阴性的标本。结论血清学筛查使我国的血液安全性已有相当高的保障;而NAT技术可进一步提高血液的安全性,但在我国是否可应用于常规血液筛查,需考虑成本与效益比。此外,ALT筛查对排除抗-HCV漏检血液仍有一定的作用。     

Identification and characterization of an HIV-2 antibody-positive blood donor in the United States

BACKGROUND: As of June 1, 1992, the Food and Drug Administration recommended that all donated blood be screened for antibodies specific to HIV-2. Despite broad serologic surveillance, only two cases of HIV-2 infection had been detected among potential blood and plasma donors since the implementation of the test. CASE REPORT: The identification of a third HIV-2 antibody-positive blood donor is reported. The first- time donor was identified by routine screening procedures as anti-HIV- 1/HIV-2-reactive, and that status was confirmed by licensed HIV-1 Western blot. Concurrent whole-virus lysate enzyme immunoassay and Western blot for HIV-2 were strongly positive, but the possibility of HIV-1 cross-reactivity could not be eliminated. The donor was notified, counseled, and deferred from future donation. He subsequently enrolled in a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-sponsored epidemiologic study of HIV-positive former donors. When it was revealed during the standardized interview that he was a native of an HIV-2-endemic region, follow-up samples were submitted to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Investigational HIV-1 and HIV-2 peptide enzyme immunoassays indicated that this infection was due to HIV-2 only. CONCLUSION: Enzyme immunoassays for antibodies to synthetic peptides of HIV-1 and HIV-2 may be useful in differentiating the two viruses in individuals with ambiguous Western blot results and risk factors for HIV-2 infection.     

Monitoring blood donors for HIV-2 infection by testing anti-HIV-1 reactive sera

Anti-HIV-1 EIA tests currently used for screening blood donors in the United States are estimated to detect 55 to 91% of HIV-2 infections; Western blots for HIV-1 antibodies may be positive, negative or indeterminate with HIV-2-positive sera. We reasoned that we could exploit the cross-reactivity of the anti-HIV-1 EIA as a means to monitor the blood supply for the appearance of HIV-2 infected or co-infected persons, and thus decide if and when routine HIV-2 screening should be adopted. We tested 913 anti-HIV-1-reactive donor sera using an anti-HIV-2 screening EIA, with confirmation by an anti-HIV-2 env-peptide EIA and an anti-HIV-2 Western blot. These 913 sera were derived from anti-HIV-1 screening of approximately 242,000 donations over a three year period. No HIV-2 infections were identified. This approach may warrant adoption in blood centers serving populations with persons from countries where HIV-2 is prevalent.     

Detection of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 p24 antigen and plasma RNA: relevance to indeterminate serologic tests

BACKGROUND: Most enzyme immunoassay-reactive specimens producing indeterminate Western blot results belong to individuals who are not infected with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1). However, a small percentage may correspond to early seroconversion or advanced disease, at which stage partial reactivity on Western blot may be observed. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: To determine the utility of HIV-1 p24 antigen and cell-free RNA detection for the resolution of Western blot-indeterminate serologic results, several types of enzyme immunoassay-positive, sero-indeterminate specimens were analyzed. Samples were obtained from infected individuals at the time of seroconversion (n = 20), from patients with AIDS (n = 2), as specimens from clinical samples obtained for diagnostic testing (n = 57), from blood donors producing persistent indeterminate results (n = 47), and from random blood donors (n = 72). RESULTS: HIV-1 p24 antigen was detected in 10 of 20 specimens collected from 9 of 12 individuals who seroconverted and in 2 of 2 AIDS patients. HIV-1 plasma RNA was positive in 22 of 22 samples from those 14 individuals. All of 57 diagnostic specimens and 47 samples obtained from persistently indeterminate donors were negative for HIV-1 p24 antigen and plasma HIV- 1 RNA. One of 72 blood donor specimens was positive for HIV-1 plasma RNA and had borderline reactivity for p24 antigen. CONCLUSION: The detection of plasma RNA appears to be sensitive and specific; negative test results may be used to identify false-positive serologic reactions. The detection of p24 antigen and plasma RNA can also be used to confirm HIV-1 infection in persons with indeterminate serologic results associated with early seroconversion or late-stage disease.     

Multicenter evaluation of a new 4th generation HIV screening assay Elecsys HIV combi

Fourth-generation screening assays which permit a simultaneous detection of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) antigen and antibody reduce the diagnostic window on average by four days in comparison to third-generation antibody assays. Recently, the new automated Elecsys HIV combi was compared in a multicenter study to alternative fourth- and third-generation assays, p24 antigen test and HIV-1 RNA RT-PCR. A total of 104 serocon-version panels, samples of the acute phase of infection after seroconversion (n = 33), anti-HIV-1 positive specimens (n = 572) from patients in different stages of the disease, 535 subtyped samples from different geographical locations, including group M (subtypes A-J) and group O, anti-HIV-2 positive sera (n = 364), dilutions of cell culture supernatants (n = 60) infected with different HIV-1 subtypes, selected performance panels, 8406 unselected samples from blood donors originating from different blood transfusion centers, 3810 unselected sera from daily routine and from hospitalized patients, 9927 unselected samples from South Africa and 1943 potentially interfering samples were tested with the Elecsys HIV combi. Elecsys HIV combi showed a comparable sensitivity to HIV-1 Ag stand-alone assays for early detection of HIV infection in seroconversion panels. The mean time delay of Elecsys HIV combi (last negative sample + 1 day) in comparison to HIV-1 RT-PCR for 92 panels tested with both methods was 3.23 days. The diagnostic window was reduced with Elecsys HIV combi between 1.56 and 5.32 days in comparison to third-generation assays. The specificity of Elecsys HIV combi in blood donors was 99.80% after repeated testing. Our results show that a fourth-generation assay with improved specificity and sensitivity like the Elecsys HIV combi is suitable for blood donor screening due to its low number of false positives and since it detects HIV p24 antigen with a comparable sensitivity to single antigen assays.     

Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 incidence among blood donors in France, 1992 through 2006: use of an immunoassay to identify recent infections

BACKGROUND: In France, blood donations found to be positive for the presence of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) are further tested to detect recent infections (< or =180 days) using an enzyme immunoassay (EIA-RI) developed in 2002. The characteristics of recently infected donors, estimates of HIV-1 incidence, and the residual risk of transfusion-transmitted HIV-1 are presented, in both first-time and repeat donors. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Of the 1027 donations found to be HIV-1-positive between 1992 and 2006, a total of 459 could be retrospectively tested with the EIA-RI. Multivariate analysis was performed to determine the donor characteristics associated with recent infection. Incidence rates and residual risk obtained with the EIA-RI were compared to classical cohort estimates derived from repeat donor histories. RESULTS: Of the 459 HIV-1-positive donors studied, 105 (22.9%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 19.2-27.0) were identified as recently infected. Factors independently associated with recent infection were repeat donor status (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 4.0; 95% CI, 2.4-6.9) and non-B subtypes (AOR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.2-3.6). Incidence decreased from 4.3 (95% CI, 1.9-9.4) in 1992 through 1994 to 1.3 (95% CI, 0.6-2.8) per 10(5) in 2004 through 2006 in first-time donors and from 3.2 (95% CI, 2.0-5.0) to 0.8 (95% CI, 0.4-1.4) per 10(5) in repeat donors. Incidence and residual risk estimates were similar to those obtained with the classical cohort method. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that the EIA-RI can be used to estimate HIV-1 incidence in a population with low HIV incidence. The estimated HIV-1 incidence in the blood donor population confirms the extremely low risk (1 in 3,350,000 donations) of HIV-infected blood donations entering the blood supply in France.     

Risk of HIV infection in recipients of untested blood from donors now anti-HIV-positive

Recipients of untested blood from donors who at a subsequent donation were positive for HIV antibody by enzyme immunoassay (EIA) were evaluated, whether the result on Western blot (WB) assay was negative (EIA+/WB-) or positive (EIA+/WB+). For 109 EIA+/WB- donors, 78 recipients were tested for HIV antibody, and 3 (4%) were positive. Two of the three anti-HIV-positive recipients had clotting disorders, and the other had been massively transfused; in each of these three cases, subsequent test data exonerated the EIA+/WB- donor. For 101 current EIA+/WB+ donors, 35 recipients were tested for HIV antibody, and 13 (37%) were positive. For donors subsequently found to be EIA+/WB+, the rate of isolation of HIV was the same whether the recipients were anti-HIV-positive or anti-HIV-negative (each, 5/6). While recipients of blood from donors subsequently found to be EIA+/WB+ were at substantial risk for HIV infection, regardless of the donor's subsequent HIV culture result, risk of HIV infection was not demonstrated for recipients of blood from donors later found to be EIA+/WB-.     

Evaluation of a confidential method of excluding blood donors exposed to human immunodeficiency virus

A confidential self-administered questionnaire was given to all donors prior to blood donation (n = 95,917). The questionnaire describes acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) high-risk groups and requires the donor to designate his blood for either laboratory purposes or for transfusion. Six-hundred and twenty-seven people (0.65%; 78% men) designated their blood for laboratory purposes. In addition to routine enzyme-linked immunoassay (EIA) screening for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) antibody, all units from the latter group of donors were tested by Western blot (WB) irrespective of the EIA result. An equal number of donor units was selected from those designating their blood for transfusion (age, sex and clinic matched) and these too were tested by WB irrespective of the EIA result. We found that donors designating their blood for laboratory purposes had a 10 times (vs transfusion-designated controls) to 100 times (vs general donor population) greater exposure to HIV. In the laboratory-designated group, an EIA negative donor was WB positive, yielding an estimated EIA false-negative rate of 16 per million. A confidential questionnaire, as described, is a valuable adjunct in ascertaining high-risk blood donors.     

Significance of antibody to hepatitis B core antigen in blood donors as determined by their serologic response to hepatitis B vaccine

Because large numbers of volunteer blood donors may be disqualified for "false-positive" results on tests for antibody to hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc), a more specific definition of anti-HBc enzyme immunoassay (EIA)-reactive was evaluated, including only those donor samples that were "strongly" reactive (sample-to-cutoff absorbance ratio, < 0.45). Results using this definition and other anti-HBc test methods were compared to the serologic response (antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen [anti-HBsAg]) to hepatitis B vaccination. Fifty-eight volunteer blood donors who had previously been deferred as donors, because of reactive anti-HBc tests (all other blood screening tests were negative, including those for HBsAg and anti-HBsAg) on two occasions, were vaccinated for hepatitis B. It was assumed that an anamnestic response to vaccine indicated past infection with hepatitis B, while a primary response to vaccine indicated lack of past infection. One (2%) of 43 donors with a historically "weak" anti-HBc (reactive absorbance ratio, > or = 0.45) had an anamnestic response to vaccine, compared to 8 (53%) of 15 with historically "strong" anti-HBc (reactive absorbance ratio, < 0.45) (p < 0.005). Anti-HBc testing using the microparticle EIA method also correlated well with hepatitis B vaccination results. The use of a narrower definition of "reactive" for anti-HBc EIA testing yielded much more specific, but slightly less sensitive, results.     

Analysis of donor-deferral pattern in a voluntary blood donor population

SUMMARY. A reterospective analysis of records of the deferred donors from 1 October 1992 to 31 December 1993 was performed. Of 14,269 prospective blood donors (13,030 males and 1,239 females), 2,431 (16.4%) donors were disqualified for various reasons: 8-1% of the donors were deferred for non-pathological causes while 91-9% were deferred for medical reasons. The most common cause for non-pathological deferral was volunteers attending below the minimum acceptable age (5-2%). Abnormal findings on physical examination accounted for 57-2% of the deferrals in which low body weight was the most common finding (32-3%) followed by low Hb (18-6%). A past history of jaundice was the leading cause for deferral on medical interview.
Numerous prospective donors are currently being deferred based on empirically derived criteria. By developing strategies to identify and rationalize donor selection criteria, the blood transfusion services should be able to decrease unnecessary deferrals.     

Neopterin levels during the early phase of human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis C virus, or hepatitis B virus infection

BACKGROUND: A study was conducted to assess the diagnostic sensitivity of neopterin screening of blood donors with regard to the detection of window-phase specimens of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), and hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: In total, 1002 diagnostic window-phase specimens from 98 seroconversion panels (29 HIV-1, 52 HCV, and 17 HBV) were analyzed with viral antigen detection, viral nucleic acid amplification testing (NAT), and neopterin quantitation assays. The study was completed by the analysis of 92 anti-hepatitis B core antigen (HBc)-reactive and 103 alanine aminotransferase (ALT)-elevated blood donor specimens. RESULTS: A significant association between elevated neopterin concentrations and the very early phase of HIV-1 infection was found. No significant correlation could be observed between neopterin levels and the early phase of HCV or HBV infection. Neopterin concentration was not increased in specimens from blood donors with anti-HBc reactivity or ALT elevation. CONCLUSIONS: Neopterin screening of blood donors may identify window-phase cases of HIV, but not of HCV or HBV infection. The diagnostic sensitivity of neopterin screening during the HIV window phase is similar to that of the p24 antigen test. With the introduction of viral NATs in blood screening, there is no additional benefit of neopterin screening with regard to the three blood-borne viruses HIV, HCV, and HBV. Acute phases of other infectious agents, however, have been reported to be detected by neopterin enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays.     

Assessing donor suitability for blood donation: Utility of Geenius HIV 1/2 confirmatory assay

BackgroundBlood donor care and blood safety require a quick and accurate decision on the presence or absence of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) infection, based on the proper selection of blood donors, serological and molecular HIV testing as well as western blot test. The aim was investigating the possibility of inclusion of Geenius HIV 1/2 Confirmatory Assay in blood donor testing algorithm in order to shorten test time and decrease the number of indeterminate results.MethodsA total of 75 archived serum/plasma samples were tested. Their previous serological and molecular HIV results were: 3 negative samples, 7 positive samples, 65 serological indeterminate or positive but confirmatory testing and NAT negative samples.ResultsGeenius assay confirmed the presence of antibodies in all blood donors with HIV positive serology and Nucleic Acid Testing (NAT). HIV-1 gp160 and gp41 antibodies were detected in these donors, while p31 and p24 antibodies were not detected in two and three donors, respectively. HIV-2 antibodies gp36 and gp140 were not found. Blood donor with HIV indeterminate or positive serology but negative confirmatory testing and NAT, were negative in Geenius assay.Conclusion The results obtained are consistent with western blot results. The assay proved simple and quick to perform. Studies have confirmed the possibility of introducing Bio-Rad Geenius into a routine blood donor testing protocol.