Factors influencing evidence‐based nursing utilization intention in Korean practice nurses

The purpose of this study was to describe Korean nurses' perceptions, attitudes and utilization intention for evidence‐based nursing (EBN), and to explore what factors influence utilization intention. We conducted a cross‐sectional survey in 2012. Registered nurses directly involved in clinical practice were recruited at a medical centre in Korea. A total of 420 nurses completed a self‐report questionnaire. Results showed that participants reported moderate scores regarding their perceptions and attitudes towards EBN, and rated themselves as higher than the median for utilization intention. Furthermore, this study revealed that perceptions of and attitudes towards EBN, occupational view and previous EBN education were significant factors affecting utilization intention. Nurse educators and managers should encourage nurses to have better attitudes towards EBN, help them be more satisfied with their work and provide them with appropriate education for EBN to establish evidence‐based practice as a part of daily nursing care.     

Evidence‐based nursing: clarifying the concepts for nurses in practice

Aim. To provide a critical analysis of key concepts associated with evidence‐based nursing (EBN) to substantiate an operational definition for nurses to use in practice. Background. Despite the plethora of literature surrounding what evidence‐based nursing is and is not and how it differs from its cousins, evidence‐based medicine and evidence‐based practice, nurses still struggle to get evidence into practice. Several reasons for this have been reported, for example, a lack of understanding about what evidence‐based nursing means or time to engage with and apply the evidence into practice. Design. An in‐depth critical review and synthesis of literature was undertaken. Method. Using the key words; evidence‐based nursing, evidence‐based medicine and evidence‐based practice 496 articles were yielded. These articles were limited to 83. Using Burns and Grove’s (2001) phased approach to reviewing the literature the articles were critically reviewed and categorised into key concepts and themes. Results. The in‐depth critical review and synthesis of the literature demonstrated that evidence‐based nursing could be defined as a distinct concept. The review clearly shows that for evidence‐based nursing to occur, nurses need to be aware of what evidence‐based nursing means, what constitutes evidence, how evidence‐based nursing differs from evidence‐based medicine and evidence‐based practice and what the process is to engage with and apply the evidence. Conclusion. The in‐depth critical review and synthesis of the evidence‐based nursing literature reinforces the need to consolidate a position for nursing in the evidence‐based field. The review confirms that evidence‐based nursing can be defined and conceptualised; however, for nurses to engage and apply with the evidence‐based processes they need to be informed of what these are and how to engage with them in practice. Relevance to clinical practice. This paper examines the concept of evidence‐based nursing and its application to clinical practice.     

A review of evidence-based practice, nursing research and reflection: levelling the hierarchy

Aim. This paper examines the evidence‐based practice movement, the hierarchy of evidence and the relationship between evidence‐based practice and reflective practice. Background. Evidence‐based practice is equated with effective decision making, with avoidance of habitual practice and with enhanced clinical performance. The hierarchy of evidence has promoted randomized control trials as the most valid source of evidence. However, this is problematic for practitioners as randomized control trials overlook certain types of knowledge that, through the process of reflection, provide useful information for individualized and effective practice. Method. A literature search was undertaken using CINAHL, medline and Ovid electronic databases in early 2006. The search terms used were: evidence‐based practice, research evidence, evidence for practice, qualitative research, reflective practice, reflection and evidence. Other sources included handpicking of books on evidence‐based practice, reflection and research. Only material written in English was included. Findings. The hierarchy of evidence that has promoted randomized control trials as the most valid form of evidence may actually impede the use of most effective treatment because of practical, political/ideological and epistemological contradictions and limitations. Furthermore, evidence‐based practice appears to share very similar definitions, aims and procedures with reflective practice. Hence, it appears that the evidence‐based practice movement may benefit much more from the use of reflection on practice, rather than the use of the hierarchical structure of evidence. Conclusion. Evidence‐based practice is necessary for nursing, but its’ effective implementation may be hindered by the hierarchy of evidence. Furthermore, evidence‐based practice and reflection are both processes that share very similar aims and procedures. Therefore, to enable the implementation of best evidence in practice, the hierarchy of evidence might need to be abandoned and reflection to become a core component of the evidence‐based practice movement. Relevance to clinical practice. Provides an elaborated analysis for clinical nurses on the definition and implementation of evidence in practice.     

Evidence based practice: a survey of physiotherapists' current practice

Backgound and Purpose . Evidence‐based practice is the explicit use of current best evidence in making decisions about the care of individual patients and is a concept of growing importance for physiotherapy. The aim of the present study was to investigate Australian physiotherapists' self‐reported practice, skills and knowledge of evidence‐based practice and to examine differences between recent and experienced graduates, physiotherapists with low and high levels of training and physiotherapists working in private practice and hospital settings. Method . A survey was sent to 230 physiotherapists working in hospitals and in private practice. One hundred and twenty‐four were completed and returned. Results . Although 69.4% of respondents said they frequently (at least monthly) read research literature, only 10.6%, 15.3% and 26.6% of respondents, respectively, searched PEDro, Cochrane and Medline or Cinahl databases frequently, and only 25.8% of respondents reported critically appraising research reports. Recent graduates rated their evidence‐based practice skills more highly than more experienced graduates, but did not perform evidence‐based practice tasks more often. Physiotherapists with higher levels of training rated their evidence‐based practice skills more highly, were more likely to search databases and to understand a range of evidence‐based practice terminology than those with lower levels of training. Private practice and hospital physiotherapists rated their evidence‐based practice skills equally and performed most evidence‐based practice activities with equal frequency. Conclusions . Respondents had a positive attitude toward evidence‐based practice and the main barriers to evidence‐based practice were time required to keep up to date, access to easily understandable summaries of evidence, journal access and lack of personal skills in searching and evaluating research evidence. Efforts to advance evidence‐based practice in physiotherapy should focus on reducing these barriers. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Exploring the contribution of the Clinical Librarian to facilitating evidence-based nursing

Aim. To examine the potential role of the Clinical Librarian in facilitating evidence‐based practice of nurses in acute hospital settings and develop a model for the role. Background. There is a growing policy and professional expectation that nurses will seek out and apply evidence in their clinical practice. Studies have demonstrated that nurses experience barriers in working with an evidence‐based approach. The role of Clinical Librarian has been used in other countries and within medicine to overcome some of the barriers to evidence‐based practice. There are limitations in the previous work in terms of rigour of evaluation, scope of the Clinical Librarian role and application to nursing in a UK setting. Design. A qualitative consultation of 72 nurses in acute care settings. Methods. Six consultation group interviews of between 4–19 participants. Written records were recorded by the scribe. Content analysis was undertaken to identify the range and frequency of comments. Results. Clinical questions currently go unanswered because of barriers of time, skills deficits and access to resources. Literature searching, skills training and evidence dissemination were the main areas of work the staff requested that a Clinical Librarian should undertake. It was anticipated that the Clinical Librarian could interact and work productively with nursing staff with a limited but regular presence on the ward. Interim communication could be via e‐mail, phone and written suggestions and requests for work. It was seen to be vital that the Clinical Librarian worked in partnership with staff to build evidence‐based practice capacity and ensure clinical relevance of the work. Conclusions. This study has generated the first model for the Clinical Librarian role with an emphasis on nursing. It is derived from the views of clinical nurses. Recommendations are made for the implementation and evaluation of such a role. Relevance to clinical practice. The Clinical Librarian could be an invaluable support to promoting evidence‐based nursing.     

护理人员对高级实践护士角色职能认同情况的调查

目的调查护理人员对设置高级实践护士角色职能的认同情况。方法调查北京市某三级甲等医院140名护士,问卷内容包括对设置高级实践护士的总体看法以及对其角色职能的认同情况。结果护士对设置高级实践护士角色持肯定态度;对绝大多数高级实践护士角色职能(39个条目)高度认同,对少数角色职能(7个条目)认同率不高甚至不认同。结论设置高级实践护士角色是临床护理人员的共识,护理人员对其角色职能的认同将有力推动我国高级实践护士的发展;现阶段我国高级实践护士的发展应以临床护理专家为主。     

Factors influencing the development of evidence-based practice: a research tool

AIM: The paper reports a study to develop and test a tool for assessing a range of factors influencing the development of evidence-based practice among clinical nurses. BACKGROUND: Achieving evidence-based practice is a goal in nursing frequently cited by the profession and in government health policy directives. Assessing factors influencing the achievement of this goal, however, is complex. Consideration needs to be given to a range of factors, including different types of evidence used to inform practice, barriers to achieving evidence-based practice, and the skills required by nurses to implement evidence-based care. METHODS: Measurement scales currently available to investigate the use of evidence in nursing practice focus on nurses' sources of knowledge and on barriers to the use of research evidence. A new, wider ranging Developing Evidence-Based Practice questionnaire was developed and tested for its measurement properties in two studies. In study 1, a sample of 598 nurses working at two hospitals in one strategic health authority in northern England was surveyed. In study 2, a slightly expanded version of the questionnaire was employed in a survey of 689 community nurses in 12 primary care organizations in two strategic health authorities, one in northern England and the other in southern England. FINDINGS: The measurement characteristics of the new questionnaire were shown to be acceptable. Ten significant, and readily interpretable, factors were seen to underlie nurses' relation to evidence-based practice. CONCLUSION: Strategies to promote evidence-based practice need to take account of the differing needs of nurses and focus on a range of sources of evidence. The Developing Evidence-Based Practice questionnaire can assist in assessing the specific 'evidencing' tendencies of any given group of nurses.     

Developing evidence-based practice: experiences of senior and junior clinical nurses

Title. Developing evidence‐based practice: experiences of senior and junior clinical nurses Aim. This paper is a report of a study to compare factors influencing the development of evidence‐based practice identified by junior and senior nurses. Background. Assessing factors influencing the achievement of evidence‐based practice is complex. Consideration needs to be given to a range of factors including different types of evidence, the skills nurses require to achieve evidence‐based practice together with barriers and facilitators. To date, little is known about the relative skills of junior and senior clinical nurses in relation to evidence‐based practice. Method. A cross‐sectional survey was undertaken at two hospitals in England, using the Developing Evidence‐Based Practice Questionnaire administered to Registered Nurses (n = 1411). A useable sample of 598 (response rate 42%) was achieved. Data were collected in 2003, with comparisons undertaken between junior and senior nurses. Findings. Nurses relied heavily on personal experience and communication with colleagues rather than formal sources of knowledge. All respondents demonstrated confidence in accessing and using evidence for practice. Senior nurses were more confident in accessing all sources of evidence including published sources and the Internet, and felt able to initiate change. Junior nurses perceived more barriers in implementing change, and were less confident in accessing organizational evidence. Junior nurses perceived lack of time and resources as major barriers, whereas senior nurses felt empowered to overcome these constraints. Conclusion. Senior nurses are developing skills in evidence‐based practice. However, the nursing culture seems to disempower junior nurses so that they are unable to develop autonomy in implementing evidence‐based practice.     

Conceptions of evidence, evidence-based medicine, evidence-based practice and their use in nursing: independent nurse prescribers' views

Aim. The purpose of this study was to explore nurses’ conceptions of evidence and evidence‐based practice, whether there are differences between evidence‐based practice and evidence‐based medicine and to identify the uptake of research evidence in the workplace. Background. The use and comprehension of the term ‘evidence‐based practice’ in relation to nursing shows remarkable variation. Numerous definitions are provided, some tend to be closely related to the concept ‘evidence‐based medicine’. Independent nurse prescribers need to be able to understand the concept of evidence‐based practice to utilize and apply this concept in order to provide adequate medication management of their patients. Method. Data were generated by focus group interview and open question questionnaire and analysed by analytical abstraction. Results. Nurses offered a variety of views on the use and uptake of evidence in the workplace. Some nurses acknowledged that they did not read research papers but were aware that they used a lot of evidence in their practice. Nurses had difficulty differentiating evidence‐based practice from evidence‐based medicine. Conclusions. Nurses were familiar with the research process but not the canons of evidenced‐based practice. The data generated indicate different levels of evidence are used by nurses. This may be a reflection of the level of intrigue of the nurses involved. Relevance to clinical practice. The education and training of independent nurse prescribers should include the exploration of evidence from randomized controlled trials and from naturalistic studies and their contribution to evidenced‐based practice and evidence‐based medicine. Both concepts need to be explored in relation to the medication management of patients.     

Achieving evidence-based nursing practice: impact of the Caledonian Development Model

Aim To determine the impact of the Caledonian Development Model, designed to promote evidence‐based practice. Background The model features practice‐development activities, benchmarking, knowledge pooling and translation through membership of a community of practice and a virtual college. Methods Twenty‐four nurses, from 18 practice sites formed three communities of practice, each selecting evidence‐based guidance to implement. A modified group supervision framework empowered nurses to champion local implementation. Outcomes were determined at 6 months. Results Eighty per cent of the patient‐related criteria and 35% of the facilities criteria were achieved. The Revised Nursing Work Index indicated these nurses experienced greater autonomy (P = 0.019) and increased organizational support (P = 0.037). Focus groups revealed a deepening organizational support for the initiative over time, illuminated work‐based learning challenges and overall enthusiasm for the approach. Conclusion Implementation of the model effectively promoted evidence‐based practice, most notably at the level of the individual patient. Implications for nursing management Time and budgetary constraints necessitate smart, value for money approaches to developing evidence‐based practice and improved care standards. This work demonstrates an effective model that strikes a balance between individual and group learning, virtual and real‐time activities, coupled with resource pooling across organizations and sectors.