环肺静脉左心房线性消融术后复发的房性心律失常

目的研究心房颤动(房颤)患者环肺静脉左心房线性消融术后复发房性心律失常的机制。方法28例房颤患者接受环肺静脉左心房线性消融术,平均年龄(54±11)岁,其中阵发性房颤10例,持续性房颤18例。采用Carto电解剖标测系统及双Lasso标测导管技术,分别进行环左、右侧肺静脉线性消融;消融终点为肺静脉电位消失,左心房-肺静脉双向阻滞。复发患者再次消融术采用双Lasso导管指导在原环形消融线上标测“漏点”并消融封闭之,对不能终止心动过速者再行拖带标测、激动标测或结合Carto系统标测;对典型心房扑动(房扑)行右心房峡部线性消融。结果初次消融术后平均随访(245±65)d,18例无复发;8例复发房性心律失常包括5例典型房扑、2例其他房性心动过速、1例阵发性房颤;2例左上肺静脉电位未完全隔离者仍持续房颤。除外1例持续性房颤,另外9例接受了再次消融术,证实所有复发患者均有左心房-肺静脉传导恢复;8例射频消融成功并随访(192±92)d无复发。结论左心房-肺静脉传导恢复是环肺静脉左心房线性消融术后复发房性心律失常的重要因素;初次手术附加右心房峡部线性消融可能减少复发率。     

肺静脉冷冻消融电隔离治疗心房颤动的即刻效果

目的探讨冷冻消融行肺静脉电隔离的即刻效果。方法选择临床确诊心房颤动(房颤)患者20例,阵发性房颤16例,持续性房颤4例。采用北极圈冷冻消融导管冷冻隔离肺静脉,Lasso导管标测肺静脉电位,肺静脉电位消失30 min为消融隔离成功。结果平均手术时间(265.88±52.20)min,曝光时间(43.42±17.23)min。实际电隔离57支肺静脉,平均每支肺静脉消融(5.64±2.57)次。2例持续性房颤在消融中终止,2例消融后电转复。7支肺静脉(占总消融肺静脉12.28%)在电位消失后30 min内恢复传导,再次行冷冻消融成功。消融即刻成功率100%。结论经导管冷冻肺静脉电隔离即刻效果较好。为减少复发,隔离后的等待时间是必要的。     

三维标测系统和单环状标测导管指示下环肺静脉线性消融电学隔离肺静脉方法学评价

目的探讨三维标测系统和单环状标测导管指示下环肺静脉线性消融电学隔离肺静脉的可行性和有效性。方法2004年5月至2004年11月间我院对68例症状明显、发作频繁、抗心律失常药物治疗无效的心房颤动(房颤)患者进行了在Carto(n=56)或EnSite/NavX(n=12)和单环状标测导管指示下的环肺静脉线性消融肺静脉电隔离术。收集操作过程中的相关数据,计算初始肺静脉电学隔离率、最终肺静脉电学隔离率及并发症资料。结果68例患者共计完成136个环形消融线,操作时间平均为(240±65)min,X线曝光时间平均为(37±12)min。用于左心房重建和环肺静脉线性消融的放电时间分别为(20±9)min和(62±24)min。在完成预定环肺静脉消融线后,初始肺静脉电学隔离率为50.7%(69/136),经寻找缝隙补充消融后最终肺静脉电学隔离率为95.6%(130/136)。70.2%(59/84)的缝隙分布于左侧,29.8%(25/84)见于右侧。并发症包括1例心脏压塞和2例锁骨下及左胸部皮下血肿,均经保守治疗康复,无肺静脉狭窄。结论三维标测系统加单环状标测导管指示下环肺静脉线性消融电学隔离肺静脉成功率高、并发症率低,操作时间及X线曝光时间可以接受。     

环肺静脉电隔离术后房性快速心律失常的机制和再消融治疗

目的分析环肺静脉电隔离术后，房性快速心律失常（ATa）发生机制和再次消融治疗结果。方法采用Lasso导管和电解剖（Carto）标测，对135例房颤患者行环同侧肺静脉电隔离消融术。术后随访时间3个月以上的102例患者中，33例患者仍有ATa发作。其中20例接受再次消融治疗。再次消融术均采用单Lasso导管标测，Carto指导下点状消融肺静脉与心房的传导点（gap），或环肺静脉线性消融左心房。消融成功终点为双侧肺静脉电隔离。结果Lasso导管标测表明，20例患者均存在心房与肺静脉（A—PVP）的电传导，一侧和双侧A—PVP传导分别为8例和12例。再次消融，18例患者达到肺静脉电隔离（其中10例为局部补点式消融，余8例行环肺静脉线性消融）。另2例患者的左侧或双侧肺静脉未能电隔离。平均随访（5．5±5．3）个月，18例术中达到消融终点的患者，仅1例仍有阵发性房颤。结论环肺静脉线性消融术后，存在或恢复左心房与肺静脉的电传导是导致ATa发生的主要原因。再次消融电隔离肺静脉是成功治疗的关键。     

电解剖系统引导下环肺静脉线性消融隔离肺静脉治疗心房颤动

目的采用双Lasso导管标测技术行环肺静脉及其周围组织隔离预防心房颤动复发。方法13例心房颤动(房颤)患者,男性8例,女性5例,平均年龄为(56±8)岁,行电生理检查和射频导管消融。其中,8例为频发的阵发性房颤(1~20年),5例为持续性房颤(1~4年)。窦性心律下起搏远端冠状静脉窦或房颤发生时,利用电解剖系统进行左心房重建。然后,将两根Lasso多极导管同时置于右(左)上、下肺静脉之内。在距肺静脉口1cm左右处行环肺静脉及其周围组织电隔离。消融终点为左心房-肺静脉/周围组织完全性阻滞,表现为放电时肺静脉电位消失。结果7例阵发性房颤患者在窦性心律下电隔离成功,5例持续性房颤和1例阵发性房颤患者在窦性心律和房颤发生时电隔离成功。3例患者放电时房颤终止:左肺静脉隔离时房颤终止1例,右肺静脉隔离时房颤终止1例,左肺静脉隔离完成后54s自行终止1例。其余3例需体外电转复。消融术时间为(256±56)min,X线曝光时间为(39±11)min。无并发症发生。在术后平均随访(104±50)d,只有1例患者在第71d时出现不典型心房扑动,自行终止。其余12例患者均无房性快速性心律失常复发。结论有明确心电学隔离指标的环肺静脉及其周围组织电隔离是一种安全有效的方法。肺静脉既可为房颤的诱发机制,亦有可能参与房颤的维持机制。     

阵发性心房颤动的射频导管消融大静脉电隔离治疗

目的报道阵发性心房颤动(房颤)的射频导管消融电隔离肺静脉和腔静脉的疗效。方法阵发性房颤患者36例,年龄(42.5±13.2)岁。经1次房间隔穿刺放置环状标测电极导管(Lasso导管)和冷盐水灌注消融导管,在Lasso导管的指导下,采用全肺静脉或上腔静脉与靶静脉节段性电隔离相结合的方法对肺静脉和腔静脉行标测和电隔离治疗。窦性心律时最早激动的肺静脉和腔静脉电位处和/或心房起搏时最短的心房和静脉电位间期处为靶点行消融。结果36例阵发性房颤患者均接受一次电隔离治疗,共电隔离大静脉115根,其中左上肺静脉34根,左下肺静脉22根,右上肺静脉30根,右下肺静脉17根,上腔静脉12根,即刻电隔离成功率为95.6%,术中并发症发生率2.78%。随访3~22个月,成功率(无房颤发作或房颤发作明显减少)为75.0%。结论射频导管消融电隔离肺静脉或腔静脉与心房间的电活动连接,可有效预防房颤的复发。治疗的关键是消融靶点的标测和确定。     

Carto merge技术联用单根Lasso导管指导心房颤动射频导管消融临床研究

目的探讨Cartomerge技术联用单根Lasso导管指导心房颤动(简称房颤)射频导管消融的安全性和有效性。方法对2006年5月至2008年8月在广西医科大学第一附属医院接受治疗的40例房颤患者用Cartomerge技术指导射频导管消融治疗房颤。术中用Carto导管标测和构建左心房和肺静脉的电解剖图,然后与术前心脏CT造影的三维图像进行数据整合形成二者的复合图形(Cartomerge)。在Cartomerge的指导下对房颤患者行环绕同侧肺静脉的线性消融,射频消融终点为Lasso导管标测证实所有肺静脉均达到电隔离效果。如房颤不终止,依次进一步消融左房顶部线、二尖瓣峡部线及三尖瓣峡部线,如上述部位消融后房颤仍未终止,予静脉注射普罗帕酮70mg,不能复律时,行同步直流电复律恢复窦性心律。结果40例房颤均达到射频消融终点。手术时间是(255.0±79.45)min,曝光时间是(43.0±19.05)min。未发生心脏穿孔和肺静脉狭窄等严重并发症,其中28例患者经4～14个月随访均维持窦性心律,近期手术成功率为70%。结论联合应用Cartomerge技术和单根Lasso导管指导进行房颤射频导管消融安全有效,可简化操作,提高消融手术的成功率,并且减少X线曝光时间。     

环肺静脉线性消融电学隔离肺静脉治疗100例心房颤动临床评价

目的探讨三维标测系统和单环状标测电极指导下行环肺静脉线性消融电学隔离肺静脉治疗心房颤动(房颤)的可行性和有效性。方法自2004年4月至2005年1月共对连续100例症状明显、发作频繁、抗心律失常药物治疗无效的房颤患者进行了在CARTO系统(76例)或EnSite-NavX系统(24例)指导下的环肺静脉线性消融术,消融终点为双侧肺静脉的彻底电学隔离。结果100例患者共完成200个环形消融环,肺静脉电学隔离率为95.0%。操作时间150～365(240±65)min,X线时间为23～61(37±12)min。其中8例(8.0%)复发患者接受了再次导管消融。随访5.5～12(10.2±5.7)个月,累计无房性快速心律失常率为85.0%。术后1、2、3、4、5、6个月时无房性快速心律失常率分别为66.0%、82.0%、87.0%、85.0%、85.0%、88.6%。并发症包括1例心脏压塞,经保守治疗后康复,1例患者出现无症状性肺静脉狭窄。结论在三维标测系统指导下,环肺静脉线性消融电学隔离肺静脉治疗房颤安全有效。     

经导管射频消融治疗阵发性心房颤动的疗效和安全性

目的 探讨经导管射频消融治疗阵发性心房颤动(简称房颤)的有效性与安全性.方法 42例阵发性房颤患者采用节段性消融肺静脉电隔离术或三维标测系统指导下环肺静脉电隔离术两种不同方法进行经导管射频消融治疗,术后进行随访,观察其疗效和安全性.结果 42例患者中,25例(59.52%)经导管消融成功.4例(9.52%)有效,13例(30.95%)无效,4例(9.52%)出现并发症,无死亡病例.节段性消融肺静脉电隔离术平均手术时间为(235.50±38.01)min,X曝光时间为(74.35±12.73)min;三维标测系统指导下环肺静脉电隔离平均手术时间为(163.18±24.76)min,X曝光时间为(36.90±8.06)min.结论 经导管射频消融治疗阵发性房颤对大部分患者是有效的,三维标测系统指导下环肺静脉电隔离术的手术时间和X曝光时间短于节段性消融肺静脉电隔离术.     

Lasso环状标测电极导管指导心房颤动持续过程中心脏大静脉电隔离

目的:报道2例心房颤动(房颤)持续过程中Lasso环状标测电极导管(Lasso电极)指导心脏大静脉 (大静脉)电隔离治疗。方法:2例患者临床症状和心电图记录提示分别为阵发性房颤(PAF)和持续性房颤。经股静脉和颈内静脉穿刺置入右心室和冠状静脉窦电极导管,并行房间隔穿刺和选择性大静脉造影。置入10极 Lasso电极进行大静脉标测。应用普通温控消融导管以局部异常电活动相对最早或频率最快、最紊乱处开始消融,在房颤持续过程中电隔离大静脉至左房连接处,以房颤终止和异常电活动消失或后者与心房电活动无关为消融终点。结果:2例患者共消融7条大静脉。1例PAF患者完成上腔静脉(SVC)和右上肺静脉(RSPV)电隔离后,消融左上肺静脉(LSPV)过程中房颤终止。另1例持续性房颤患者完成SVC、RSFV、LSPV及右下肺静脉电隔离,加做左房峡部、三尖瓣-下腔静脉峡部线性消融后,同步电复律使房颤转为窦性心律。随访1年,无房颤复发和相关并发症。结论:Lasso电极指导下应用普通温控消融导管可于心房颤动持续过程中电隔离大静脉而治疗房颤。     

三维标测系统指导下环肺静脉消融治疗心房颤动

目的 探讨三维标测系统指导下环肺静脉消融治疗心房颤动的安全性和有效性.方法 阵发性心房颤动92例和持续性或永久性心房颤动36例,接受环肺静脉消融术.采用Carto电解剖标测系统,进行环肺静脉左心房线性消融,消融终点为肺静脉电隔离.手术结束时对心律仍为心房颤动者行同步直流电心脏复律.结果 完成"解剖学"环形消融线256条,其中58.6%达到电隔离肺静脉的终点,经寻找缝隙补充消融后最终248条(96.9%)消融线达到终点.手术时间(231±45)min、X线曝光时间(42±13)min和放电时间(66±17)min.术后随访平均10个月,无复发101例(78.9%).接受了再次手术15例,心内电生理检查证实14例有左心房-肺静脉传导,射频消融成功并随访30～270 d,两次射频消融术后总成功率为87.5%,其中阵发性心房颤动成功率为93.0%,持续性或永久性心房颤动为76.7%.并发症发生率为6.2%,包括心包填塞2例、小脑梗死2例、股静脉穿刺部位血肿1例和左侧大量血胸1例,经治疗后均痊愈.结论 以肺静脉电隔离为目标的环肺静脉消融术治疗心房颤动有效和安全.     

Complete pulmonary vein isolation guided by three-dimensional electroanatomical mapping for the treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy.

AIMS: Evaluation of the clinical outcome of patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM) and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) treated with complete pulmonary vein (PV) isolation guided by three-dimensional (3-D) electroanatomical (EA) mapping. METHODS: Circumferential radiofrequency (RF) ablation and continuous circular lesions (CCLs) around the left and right-sided PVs were performed in 4 highly symptomatic patients (2 males; age 57.5 +/- 8.3 years) with HOCM and anti-arrhythmic drug (AAD) refractory paroxysmal AF. Ablation was guided by 3-D EA mapping combined with conventional circumferential PV mapping. The endpoints of the ablation were defined as: (1) absence of all PV spikes documented with the two Lasso catheters within the ipsilateral PVs; and (2) no recurrence of the PV spikes within all PVs following intravenous administration of adenosine. RESULTS: The ablation endpoints were achieved in all patients. A repeat ablation was performed in one patient due to repetitive atrial tachycardia, 1 month after the initial procedure. During a follow-up of 5.8 +/- 2.7 months, all patients are free of AF recurrence. Short episodes of symptomatic AT were documented after the repeat procedure, and were well controlled with oral amiodarone in the patient. No procedure-related complications were observed. CONCLUSION: The present study demonstrates that complete isolation of ipsilateral PVs guided by 3-D EA mapping is potentially effective for the treatment of highly symptomatic, drug refractory paroxysmal AF in patients with HOCM.     

Prevalence of pulmonary vein disconnection after anatomical ablation for atrial fibrillation: consequences of wide atrial encircling of the pulmonary veins.

AIMS: Anatomical and wide atrial encircling of the pulmonary veins (PVs) has been proposed as a cure of atrial fibrillation (AF). We evaluated the acute achievement of electrical PV isolation using this approach. In addition, the consequences of wide encircling of the PVs with isolation were assessed. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty patients with paroxysmal AF were studied. Anatomically guided ablation was performed utilizing the CARTO system to deliver coalescent lesions circumferentially around each PV to produce a voltage reduction to <0.1 mV, with the operator blinded to recordings of circumferential PV mapping. After achieving the anatomical endpoint, the incidence of residual conduction and the amplitude and conduction delay of residual PV potentials were determined. Electrical isolation of the PV was then performed and the residual far-field potentials evaluated. Individual PV ablation was performed in all PVs. Anatomically guided PV ablation was performed for 47.3+/-11 min, after which 44 (55%) PVs were electrically isolated. In the remaining 45%, despite abolition of the local potential at the ablation site, PV potentials [amplitude 0.2 mV (range 0.09-0.75) and delay of 50.3+/-12.6 ms] were identified by circumferential mapping. After electrical isolation (12.2+/-11.7 min ablation), 55 (69%) PVs demonstrated far-field potentials; with a greater incidence (P=0.015) and amplitude (P=0.021) on the left compared with the right PVs. At 13.2+/-8.3 months follow-up, 13 patients (65%) remained arrhythmia-free without anti-arrhythmics. In four patients (20%), spontaneous sustained left atrial macrore-entry required re-mapping and ablation. Macrore-entry was observed to utilize regions around or bordering the previous ablation as its substrate. CONCLUSION: Anatomically guided circumferential PV ablation results in apparently coalescent but electrically incomplete lesions with residual conduction in 45% of PVs. Wide encircling of the PVs was associated with left atrial macrore-entry in 20% of patients.     

在心房颤动持续过程中行肺静脉电学隔离术的可行性

探讨在心房颤动 (简称房颤 )持续过程中行肺静脉电学隔离术的可行性。 9例在导管消融术中房颤持续发作的房颤患者 ,根据肺静脉环状标测电极导管记录的肺静脉激动特征采用 2种方法进行肺静脉开口部的消融 :①肺静脉激动有序且有一种或多种固定的激动顺序 ,采用射频导管消融环状电极记录的最早的激动部位 ;②肺静脉激动无序或无明确的激动顺序 ,首先使用超声球囊导管消融 ,如未达终点再加用射频导管消融。 2种方法的消融终点均为肺静脉电学隔离。总计对 31根肺静脉进行了消融 ,其中 2 8根在房颤心律下消融。房颤心律下电隔离肺静脉的成功率为 92 .9% (2 6根 )。总操作时间和X线透视时间分别为 1 38± 2 1min和 38± 9min。本组无肺静脉狭窄及其他并发症。随访 6 .3± 2 .9(3～ 1 1 )个月后 ,4例 (44.4% )患者无房颤发作 (无需药物 )。结论 :在房颤持续过程中行肺静脉电学隔离术方法可行 ,且较为安全 ;联用超声球囊消融和射频消融对于房颤发作过程中无序或无明确激动顺序的肺静脉具有较好的电学隔离效果。     

EnSite-NavX和双Lasso指导下的左心房线性消融治疗阵发性心房颤动

目的在ENSITE-NAVX和双LASSO指导下环肺静脉口外线性消融,使肺静脉电活动与心房电活动分离,介绍这一手术方法治疗阵发性心房颤动(房颤)的初步经验。方法2004年4月至11月,共收治22例阵发性房颤患者,其中男性19例,女性3例,年龄25~67(48·5±11·4)岁,房颤病史0·5~13·0(4·3±3·3)年。3例有原发性高血压史,余均无器质性心脏病病史。超声心动图检查示左心房直径为31~46(37·5±4·6)MM。所有患者在建立ENSITE-NAVX左心房几何构型后,于肺静脉开口外0·5~1·0CM处设置环右侧肺静脉和左侧肺静脉的环状消融线径。盐水灌注导管沿拟定消融线逐点消融,完成右侧消融环线至LASSO电极上肺静脉电位消失;再完成左侧消融环线至肺静脉电位消失。术后服用普罗帕酮450MG/D、培哚普利4MG/D,共3个月。结果22例患者,除1例术中因心包填塞未达消融终点外,余21例均达到消融终点;其中3例于房颤节律时消融,余18例于窦性节律下消融。手术时间5·0~10·0(6·6±1·3)H,X线时间为30~84(56·1±18·0)MIN。随访3~11(5·3±2·7)个月,10例患者术后症状消失,HOLTER示偶见房性早搏。2例经再次手术后未再有房颤发作。3例术后1个月内有阵发性房颤发作,但1个月后未再有发作。2例术后仍有心悸症状,但无房颤发作,HOLTER示频繁房性早搏,少数组成短阵房性心动过速;3例仍有房颤发作;1例患者房颤发作更趋频繁。术中共2例发生心包填塞。本研究组总成功率为81%。结论ENSITE-NAVX和双LASSO指导下的左心房线性消融治疗阵发性房颤具有较高成功率,其长期结果有待于更多病例的积累和更长时间的随访。     

A single pulmonary vein as electrophysiological substrate of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

Introduction: It has been demonstrated that pulmonary veins (PVs) play an important role in initiation and maintenance of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). However, it is not clearly known whether a single PV acts as electrophysiological substrate for paroxysmal AF.
Methods and Results: This study included five patients with paroxysmal AF. All patients underwent complete PV isolation with continuous circular lesions (CCLs) around the ipsilateral PVs guided by a three-dimensional mapping system. Irrigated radiofrequency (RF) delivery was performed during AF on the right-sided CCLs in two patients and on the left-sided CCLs in three patients. The incomplete CCLs resulted in a change from AF to atrial tachycardia (AT), which presented with an identical atrial activation sequence and P wave morphology. Complete CCLs resulted in AF termination with persistent PV tachyarrhythmias within the isolated PV in all five patients. PV tachyarrhythmia within the isolated PV was PV fibrillation from the left common PV (LCPV) in two patients, PV tachycardia from the right superior PV (RSPV) in two patients, and from the left superior PV in one patient. All sustained PV tachyarrhythmias persisted for more than 30 minutes, needed external cardioversion for termination in four patients and a focal ablation in one patient. After the initial procedure, an AT from the RSPV occurred in a patient with PV fibrillation within the LCPV, and was successfully ablated.
Conclusion: In patients with paroxysmal AF, sustained PV tachyarrhythmias from a single PV can perpetuate AF. Complete isolation of all PV may provide good clinical outcome during long-term follow-up.     

Electrical isolation of pulmonary veins in patients with atrial fibrillation: reduction of fluoroscopy exposure and procedure duration by the use of a non-fluoroscopic navigation system (NavX).

AIMS: The aim of the study was to investigate the feasibility of performing segmental pulmonary vein (PV) isolation guided by the NavX (Endocardial Solutions, St Jude Medical, Inc., St Paul, MN, USA) system without the three-dimensional (3D) geometric reconstruction option and whether the use of NavX system will reduce the radiation exposure and procedure duration. METHODS AND RESULTS: The study included 64 patients with symptomatic paroxysmal or permanent atrial fibrillation, in whom PV isolation was performed using fluoroscopic guidance (n=32) or the NavX system (n=32). Pulmonary vein mapping with a circular mapping catheter allowed the identification and localization of myocardial connections between the PV and the left atrium. PV isolation was performed by radiofrequency ablation of these connections at the atrial aspect of the PV ostium. Primary success rate for isolated PVs did not differ significantly in patients ablated under fluoroscopic guidance vs. those ablated under guidance of NavX system [100/107 PVs (93.5%) vs. 120/124 PV (96.8%; P=n.s.)]. Compared with fluoroscopy guided procedures, NavX-guided procedures showed a significant reduction in the fluoroscopy time (75.8+/-24.5 vs. 38.9+/-19.3 min, P<0.05), total X-ray exposure (93.2+/-51.6 vs. 56.6+/-37.9 Gy cm(2), P=0.03), and total procedural time (237.7+/-65.4 vs. 188.6+/-62.7 min, P=0.01). The mean follow-up was 9.5+/-3.0 months. One patient in each group was lost to follow-up. Seven-day Holter monitoring showed that 23 of 31 patients (74.2%) in the NavX-guided group and 21 of 31 patients (67.7%) in the fluoroscopy-guided group were in sinus rhythm (P=0.57). CONCLUSION: The 3D visualization of the catheters by NavX system allows a rapid and precise visualization of the mapping and ablation catheters at the PV ostia and markedly reduces fluoroscopy time, total X-ray exposure, and procedural duration during PV isolation compared with ablation performed under fluoroscopy guidance.     

Lasso环形标测电极导管指导阵发性心房颤动肺静脉电隔离

探讨在Lasso环形标测电极导管指导下对阵发性心房颤动 (PAF)患者行肺静脉电隔离术的安全性、有效性。顽固性PAF患者 30例 ,男 19例 ,年龄 5 3± 15 (41～ 70 )岁 ,在肺静脉口用Lasso环形电极导管对肺静脉逐一进行标测 ,于肺静脉最早的心房 肺静脉电位处消融 ,电学隔离肺静脉。消融温度控制在 5 0℃ ,功率 2 5～ 35W。结果 :电学隔离肺静脉 6 9根 ,其中左上肺静脉 2 8根、左下肺静脉 2 0根、右上肺静脉 15根、右下肺静脉 6根 ,电隔离成功6 5根 ;电隔离上腔静脉 6根 ,左房后游离壁异位兴奋灶消融 8个 ,无手术相关并发症。即刻成功率 94 %。随访10 .1± 5 .1(5～ 2 2 )个月 ,成功率 (无心房颤动发作 ) 6 1%。结论 :在Lasso环形标测电极导管指导下对PAF患者行肺静脉电隔离术安全有效 ,是一种很有前途的治疗PAF的消融方法。     

阵发性心房颤动患者肺静脉前庭电生理现象及分析

目的采用EnSite/NavX系统指导下,结合单Lasso进行环肺静脉电隔离术治疗阵发性心房颤动(简称房颤),分析消融过程中肺静脉前庭电生理现象。方法入选2004年10月~2005年12月症状性阵发性房颤患者143例,男85例、女58例,年龄60.7±10.3(35~80)岁,房颤病程5.5±6.7年(21天~50年),左房内径36.9±6.4(24~54)mm。在EnSite-NavX系统引导下行环肺静脉消融达到肺静脉电隔离。结果143例完成环肺静脉隔离术,手术时间157±30(90~240)min,放射线时间25.8±8.8(9.8~60.1)min。环单侧左、右肺静脉前庭消融电隔离率分别为81.2%、78.3%,其余病例结合节段性消融(SOA)达到肺静脉电隔离。房颤终止的比例为69.7%(23/33例),第一次消融63.6%(91/143)可记录到肺静脉内自发电位,2.1%(3/143)可记录到肺静脉内快速的自主节律,而体表心电图为稳定的窦性心律。房颤复发患者第二次消融时,所有21例均有肺静脉电位(PVP)恢复,其中第一次消融时结合SOA达到肺静脉隔离的患者:57.1%左侧PVP恢复,55.6%右侧PVP恢复。第二次消融时,85.7%(18/21)例存在肺静脉内自发电位。术后房性心动过速/心房扑动15例(10.5%),12例再次行射频消融治疗,11例消融成功。术后随访10.7±4.9(4~18)个月,包括第二次消融术后患者在内,共90.2%(129/143)在无抗心律失常药物治疗下无房颤发作。心包积液2例,Ensite/NavX电极贴片故障1例。结论心房-肺静脉传导存在优势传导径路,且传导方式并非“全或无”;结合SOA的消融方法复发率较高;多数患者肺静脉隔离后可记录到自发肺静脉电位,复发患者的肺静脉通常具有较高的兴奋性。     

Intracardiac echocardiography-guided,anatomically based radiofrequency ablation of focal atrial fibrillation originating from pulmonary veins

OBJECTIVES: In patients with a pulmonary vein (PV) source for atrial fibrillation (AF), we sought the use of intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) to evaluate PV anatomy, guide radiofrequency (RF) ablation and monitor for acute stenosis during ablation. BACKGROUND: A focal source for AF may be found in the proximal component of the PVs and can be effectively treated by ablative techniques. However, the procedure may be challenging due to the complex anatomy of the left atrium and PVs, uncertain catheter positioning within the PVs and difficulties in mapping atrial extrasystoles, which may be rare or repeatedly induce AF and require cardioversion. METHODS: Sixty-four patients were referred for RF ablation of a focal source of AF, and 56 were identified as having AF triggers in > or =1 PV. Using ICE guidance, RF lesions were applied around the circumference of the vein near the os until there was electrical isolation. RESULTS: Lesions were placed in 82 veins (36 right superior PV, 33 left superior PV, 9 left inferior PV, 4 right inferior PV); 24 +/- 12 lesions per vein were necessary to create electrical isolation with a fluoroscopic time of 11 +/- 4 min and a mean of 22% reduction in luminal area. After a follow-up of 13 +/- 7 months, 66% of patients remained free of AF, and another 13% responded better to medications. CONCLUSIONS: We describe an anatomic approach to PV electrical isolation in which ICE is used to define the anatomy, guide RF ablation and monitor for acute PV changes.