Omeprazole 10 mg or 20 mg once daily in the prevention of recurrence of reflux oesophagitis. Solo Investigator Group.

This study determined the optimal maintenance dose of omeprazole in reflux oesophagitis. One hundred and ninety three patients rendered asymptomatic and healed after four or eight weeks omeprazole were randomised double blind to 10 mg omeprazole once daily (n = 60 evaluable), 20 mg omeprazole once daily (n = 68), or placebo (n = 62) for one year or until symptomatic relapse. Each omeprazole regimen was superior to placebo in preventing both symptomatic relapse (life table analysis, p < 0.001) and endoscopically verified relapse (p < 0.001). At 12 months, the life table endoscopic remission rates (proportions of patients without grade > or = 2 oesophagitis) were: 50% (95% confidence intervals 34 to 66%) with 10 mg omeprazole once daily, 74% (62 to 86%) with 20 mg omeprazole once daily, and 14% (2 to 26%) with placebo. At 12 months, the life table symptomatic remission rates (proportions of patients asymptomatic or with mild symptoms) were: 77% (64 to 89%) with 10 mg omeprazole once daily, 83% (73 to 93%) with 20 mg omeprazole once daily, and 34% (16 to 52%) with placebo. Both 10 mg and 20 mg omeprazole once daily were effective in prolonging the remission of reflux oesophagitis: 10 mg may be appropriate to start longterm treatment, though the existence of a dose response relation means that 20 mg once daily may be effective in patients for whom 10 mg once daily is suboptimal.     

Effects of once-weekly oral alendronate on bone in children on glucocorticoid treatment

OBJECTIVES: To determine the effects of once-weekly oral alendronate on indices of bone size, density and resorption in children with chronic illness being treated with glucocorticoids. METHODS: Twenty-two children with chronic illness treated with prednisone were randomized to receive 1 year's treatment with either once-weekly oral placebo or alendronate (1-2 mg/kg body weight) in a double-blind study. The main outcome measures were changes in lumbar spine and femoral shaft size and volumetric density (measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry) and N-telopeptide excretion (a marker of bone resorption). RESULTS: Once-weekly alendronate was well tolerated, and there were no major adverse events. In both groups bone size and bone mineral content increased through growth. Volumetric bone density of the lumbar spine increased significantly in the alendronate group (P = 0.013), but not in the placebo group. There were no differences between the groups in growth in the cortical width of the femoral shaft, but the cross-sectional moment of inertia per unit length-a derived estimate of mechanical strength-increased significantly in the alendronate group (P = 0.014) but not in the placebo group. Urine N-telopeptide excretion was suppressed significantly in the alendronate group (P = 0.007) but not in the placebo group. Height velocity was positively correlated with changes in both lumbar spine area and the total width of the femoral shaft (P = 0.015, P = 0.026, respectively). CONCLUSION: Once-weekly oral alendronate is well tolerated, suppresses bone resorption and may improve volumetric bone density at the lumbar spine and mechanical strength of the femoral shaft in children with chronic illness taking glucocorticoids. It does not affect bone growth. Larger controlled studies are needed to determine if these changes translate into reduced fracture incidence or greater peak bone mass. This study highlights the importance of differentiating between changes in bone size and changes in volumetric bone density in assessing bone in children, and also having control subjects in intervention studies.     

阿仑膦酸钠治疗男性原发性骨质疏松症临床研究

目的 探讨骨吸收抑制剂阿仑膦酸钠对男性原发性骨质疏松症骨密度和骨转换生化指标的影响.方法 2005年1月至2007年1月前瞻性纳入北京协和医院诊断的20例男性原发性骨质疏松症患者,以20名正常男性为对照.骨质疏松症患者每周服用阿仑膦酸钠70 mg,且每日服用钙尔奇D 1片,疗程为18个月.每6个月采用双能x线骨密度仪测量腰椎和股骨近段骨密度,每3个月测量骨形成指标碱性磷酸酶和骨吸收指标Ⅰ型胶原羧基末端肽.正常男性不予干预,研究开始时和18个月时检查腰椎和股骨近端骨密度.结果 骨质疏松症组治疗前骨密度明显低于正常对照组.阿仑膦酸钠组治疗18个月时,与治疗前比较,腰椎、股骨颈、大转子、全髋和股骨干骨密度值增加6.3%、2.5%、5.8%、3.5%及4.2%(P均<0.05).骨转换生化指标碱性磷酸酶(ALP)和CTX治疗6个月时即显著下降,此后维持在较低水平,治疗18个月后ALP降低33.6%,CTX下降66.7%(P均<0.01).骨吸收指标较骨形成指标下降更明显.患者对阿仑膦酸钠的耐受性良好.正常对照组骨密度和血ALP在18个月期间无明显变化.结论 与对女性骨质疏松症患者疗效相似,阿仑膦酸钠能够明显增加男性原发性骨质疏松症患者的骨密度、降低骨转换生化指标,且安全性良好.     

Alendronate treatment for osteoporosis: a review of the evidence

Alendronate, a bisphosphonate indicated for the management of osteoporosis, is an antiresorptive agent that directly inhibits osteoclast activity. It reduces bone turnover and increases spine and hip BMD. Equivalent effects on turnover and BMD have been reported with once-weekly dosing, using seven times the daily dose. Among 3658 women with osteoporosis enrolled in the Fracture Intervention Trial (FIT), there was a 53% reduction in hip fractures, a 48% reduction in morphometric vertebral fractures, a 45% reduction in clinical vertebral fractures, and a 30% reduction in all clinical fractures. Each of these differences was already statistically significant within 12 months of starting treatment. The drug is safe and well tolerated.     

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study comparing the efficacy and safety of ebastine (20 mg and 10 mg) to loratadine 10 mg once daily in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis.

Few randomized studies have compared the H1-receptor antagonists loratadine and ebastine in seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) patients. The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of ebastine 20 mg (E20), ebastine 10 mg (E10), loratadine 10 mg (L10), and placebo (P), once daily, in controlling symptoms of SAR over a 4-week period. This was a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, parallel-group study. Efficacy was assessed in 749 patients (12 to 70 years old) by SAR symptom scores (nasal discharge, congestion, itching, sneezing, and total eye symptoms) entered on diary cards every morning and every evening over the previous 12 hours (reflective score) and at the time of recording (snapshot score). The E20 group showed greater reductions from baseline compared with the L10 group in 2 daily reflective composite scores (nasal index [with or without congestion]) and in all 4 daily snapshot composite scores. E10 and L10 groups showed no significant differences in either the daily reflective or snapshot scores overall although E10 showed a greater improvement of nasal discharge snapshot score than L10. The efficacy of E20 at controlling the symptoms of SAR was well sustained during the fourth week of treatment, with significant differences over placebo in 22/36 total rhinitis symptom scores, followed by E10 (6/36), whereas L10 showed no differences (0/36). Patient and physician global evaluations at the final visit were not statistically significant for any treatment group compared with placebo. There was no significant difference among all groups in the number of patients who reported adverse events. In conclusion, ebastine 20 mg given once daily for 4 weeks in the treatment of SAR showed larger mean reductions from baseline in most rhinitis symptoms scores than loratadine 10 mg. Sustained efficacy was most frequently observed with ebastine 20 mg over placebo, whereas loratadine 10 mg did not provide a statistically significant improvement in any individual or composite symptom score at the end of the fourth week. Both ebastine 20 and 10 mg were well tolerated and proved safe in the treatment of SAR.     

Efficacy and safety of ten day moxifloxacin 400 mg once daily in the treatment of patients with community-acquired pneumonia. Community Acquired Pneumonia Study Group

Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) remains a common and serious illness with approximately 2-4 million cases reported annually. Management of CAP is therapeutically challenging due to the increasing prevalence of penicillin- and macrolide-resistant pneumococci and beta-lactamase producing Haemophilus influenzae, as well as the increased recognition of 'atypical' pathogens, such as Chlamydia pneumoniae and Mycoplasma pneumoniae, and the frequent need for empiric therapy. We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of moxifloxacin in the treatment of patients with CAP. To do this we carried out a prospective, uncontrolled, non-blind, Phase III clinical trial, in 27 U.S. centers. Patients included in the study were over 18 years of age with signs and symptoms of CAP confirmed by evidence of a new or progressive infiltrate on chest radiograph. The intervention used was moxifloxacin 400 mg PO once daily for 10 days. Sputum samples were collected pretherapy for Gram stain and culture for typical organisms. Culture and serological testing for Chlamydia pneumoniae and Mycoplasma pneumoniae was also performed. Susceptibility to moxifloxacin was determined by disk diffusion and MIC. Clinical and bacteriological responses were determined at the end of therapy (0-6 days post-therapy), follow-up (14-35 days post-therapy) and overall (end of therapy plus follow-up). Analyses were performed on both valid for efficacy and intent-to-treat populations. The primary efficacy variable was overall clinical resolution. Of 254 patients enrolled in the Study, 196 patients were included in the efficacy analyses. The majority of patients were male (58%) and Caucasian (85%) with a mean age of 49 years (range: 18 to 85 years). Only 3% of patients were hospitalized pretherapy. The most common pretherapy organisms identified, by culture or serology, in the valid for efficacy population (i.e. 147 organisms among 116 patients), were: Chlamydia pneumoniae (n=63; 54%), Mycoplasma pneumoniae (n=29; 25%), Streptococcus pneumoniae (n=14; 12%) and Haemophilus influenzae (n=13; 10%). End of therapy, follow-up and overall clinical resolution rates for the valid for efficacy population were 94%, 93% and 93%, respectively. The 95% CI for the overall clinical resolution rate was 88.1%, 95.9%. The overall bacteriological response for patients diagnosed by culture or serological criteria, was 91% (95% CI=84%, 96%). For patients who only met serological criteria for infection, the overall bacteriological response was 94% (60/64). Bacterial response rates for the four most commonly isolated pathogens were: 89% (56/63) for C. pneumoniae, 93% (27/29) for M. pneumoniae, 93% (13/14) for S. pneumoniae and 85% (11/13) for H. influenzae. Drug-related adverse events were reported in 33% (85/254) of moxifloxacin-treated patients. Nausea (9%), diarrhea (6%) and dizziness (4%) were the most commonly reported adverse events. Atypical organisms were isolated in high frequency among patients with CAP. Moxifloxacin 400 mg once daily for 10 days was effective and well-tolerated in the treatment of these adult patients with CAP. Moxifloxacin offers an effective treatment alternative for CAP due to both typical and atypical bacterial pathogens.     

Alendronate in early postmenopausal women: effects on bone mass during long-term treatment and after withdrawal. Alendronate Osteoporosis Prevention Study Group

We studied the effect on bone mass of alendronate treatment for 5 yr and its withdrawal. Four hundred and forty-seven postmenopausal women with normal bone mass entered a 3-yr randomized trial followed by a 2-yr open label extension. Three hundred and eleven women completed the first 3 yr, and 263 consented to continue and completed the extension. We are reporting data from groups using the dose of alendronate currently approved for osteoporosis prevention (5 mg) or from the group in which alendronate treatment was withdrawn: 52 women received alendronate (5 mg) for 5 yr (group I), 56 received 3 yr of placebo followed by alendronate (5 mg) for 2 yr (group II), and 52 received alendronate (20 mg) for 2 yr followed by 3 yr off therapy (group III). In group I, alendronate (5 mg) increased bone mineral density (BMD) at the spine and trochanter by 2.5-3.2% (P < 0.001 vs. baseline) and stabilized total body and femoral neck BMD (change vs. baseline, P = NS) over 5 yr. By the end of 5 yr, BMD was comparable at the spine, hip, and total body in groups I and III. The 3-yr decrease in BMD after withdrawal of alendronate (20 mg) in group III was 1.8-5.7% (P < 0.01 vs. baseline) and similar to the 3-yr decrease in BMD in group II during the initial 3 yr. In conclusion, alendronate (5 mg) for 5 yr or alendronate (20 mg) for 2 yr followed by 3 yr off therapy prevented postmenopausal bone loss. After withdrawal of alendronate (20 mg), bone loss resumed at the normal early postmenopausal rate.     

Reduction of gastric acid secretion by 10 mg and 30 mg omeprazole once daily

The reduction in gastric acid secretion by 10 mg and 30 mg omeprazole was studied in 12 patients with ulcer disease in a randomized, double-blind, two-way balanced crossover study. A standardized pentagastrin test was performed before the study and 24 h after each treatment period of 6 days. Treatment was followed by a washout period of 7 days. Omeprazole, 30 mg/day, significantly reduced basal acid output (BAO) by 90% and pentagastrin-stimulated acid output (PAO) by 45% (p less than 0.01), whereas BAO and PAO were not significantly reduced by omeprazole, 10 mg/day.     

Rabeprazole, 20 mg once daily or 10 mg twice daily, is equivalent to omeprazole, 20 mg once daily, in the healing of erosive gastrooesophageal reflux disease

BACKGROUND: Proton pump inhibitors are the most potent pharmacologic inhibitors of gastric acid secretion currently available, and have proven effective in the treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The object of this study was to compare the efficacy and tolerability of a new proton pump inhibitor, rabeprazole at two different dosages, with that of omeprazole in the healing of erosive GERD. METHODS: Rabeprazole 20 mg once daily (QD) and 10 mg twice daily (BID) were compared with omeprazole 20 mg QD in a double-blind, multicentre, parallel group study involving 310 patients with erosive GERD. The primary efficacy endpoint was oesophageal mucosal healing determined by endoscopy. Secondary endpoints included reduction in symptoms and improvements in quality-of-life scores. RESULTS: The healing rates between both rabeprazole groups and the omeprazole group were equivalent in both the per-protocol and intent-to-treat populations. In the per-protocol population, rabeprazole 20 mg was noted to have a numerical trend toward more rapid daytime heartburn relief. However, by 4 and 8 weeks of treatment, no significant differences were found between groups for secondary endpoints, adverse events, or laboratory abnormalities including elevation of serum gastrin levels. CONCLUSIONS: Rabeprazole 20 mg in two different dosing schedules is as effective as omeprazole 20 mg QD with regard to efficacy and tolerability in patients with erosive GERD.     

Alendronate and estrogen effects in postmenopausal women with low bone mineral density. Alendronate/Estrogen Study Group

The bisphosphonate alendronate and conjugated equine estrogens are both widely used for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Acting by different mechanisms, these two agents decrease bone resorption and thereby increase or preserve bone mineral density (BMD). The comparative and combined effects of these medications have not been rigorously studied. This prospective, double blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial examined the effects of oral alendronate and conjugated estrogen, in combination and separately, on BMD, biochemical markers of bone turnover, safety, and tolerability in 425 hysterectomized postmenopausal women with low bone mass. In addition, bone biopsy with histomorphometry was performed in a subset of subjects. Treatment included placebo, alendronate (10 mg daily), conjugated equine estrogen (CEE; 0.625 mg daily), or alendronate (10 mg daily) plus CEE (0.625 mg daily) for 2 yr. All of the women received a supplement of 500 mg calcium daily. At 2 yr, placebo-treated patients showed a mean 0.6% loss in lumbar spine BMD, compared with mean increases in women receiving alendronate, CEE, and alendronate plus CEE of 6.0% (P < 0.001 vs. placebo), 6.0% (P < 0.001 vs. placebo), and 8.3% (P < 0.001 vs. placebo and CEE; P = 0.022 vs. alendronate), respectively. The corresponding changes in total proximal femur bone mineral density were +4.0%, +3.4%, +4.7%, and +0.3% for the alendronate, estrogen, alendronate plus estrogen, and placebo groups, respectively. Both alendronate and CEE significantly decreased biochemical markers of bone turnover, specifically urinary N-telopeptide of type I collagen and serum bone-specific alkaline phosphatase. The alendronate plus CEE combination produced slightly greater decreases in these markers than either treatment alone, but the mean absolute values remained within the normal premenopausal range. Alendronate, alone or in combination with CEE, was well tolerated. In the subset of patients who underwent bone biopsies, histomorphometry showed normal bone histology with the expected decrease in bone turnover, which was somewhat more pronounced in the combination group. Thus, alendronate and estrogen produced favorable effects on BMD. Combined use of alendronate and estrogen produced somewhat larger increases in BMD than either agent alone and was well tolerated.     

A comparison of enalapril 20 mg once daily versus 10 mg twice daily in terms of blood pressure lowering and patient compliance

OBJECTIVE: To compare enalapril 20 mg once daily with 10 mg twice daily in terms of blood pressure reduction and patient compliance. DESIGN: Cross-over study of patients randomly assigned to a sequence of enalapril 20 mg once daily or 10 mg twice daily in three 4-week periods following a 4-week placebo run-in. SETTING: General practices in the greater Belfast and Lisburn area in Northern Ireland. PATIENTS: Twenty-five hypertensive patients who had a mean diastolic blood pressure of between 90 and 110 mm Hg after receiving placebo for 4 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Reduction in blood pressure and estimation of patient compliance. RESULTS: Patient compliance was superior on the once daily regimen. However, the twice daily regimen was associated with a greater blood pressure reduction which almost reached statistical significance at the 5% level. CONCLUSIONS: Enalapril 20 mg should be prescribed as 10 mg twice daily and measures taken to improve patient compliance.     

阿仑膦酸钠对糖皮质激素导致骨质疏松防治作用的Meta分析

目的 评价阿仑膦酸钠防治糖皮质激素导致的骨质疏松(GIOP)的有效性和安全性.方法 检索PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane Library、Web of Science、中国生物医学文献数据库(CBM)、万方数据库,收集有关阿仑膦酸钠与安慰剂比较防治GIOP的随机对照试验(RCT),依据Jadad评分评价纳入RCT的质量,采用RevMan 5.1进行统计分析.结果 纳入7篇文献,共1111例患者.Meta分析显示,与安慰剂相比,阿仑膦酸钠治疗12个月可增加腰椎和股骨颈的骨密度(BMD)[均数差(MD)＝3.35,95％ CI(2.67 ～4.02),P=0.000;MD=1.90,95％ CI(0.89 ～2.92),P=0.000],治疗24个月增加腰椎BMD[MD＝3.91,95％ CI(2.37 ～5.45),P＜0.000],但没有增加股骨颈BMD[MD=1.91,95％ CI(-1.15 ～5.02),P＝0.22].在降低椎骨和非椎骨骨折风险方面与安慰剂相比差异无统计学意义[RR＝1.00,95％ CI (0.49 ～2.07),P=0.99;RR=1.02,95％ CI (0.49～2.14),P=0.95].阿仑膦酸钠与安慰剂相比不良事件发生率的差异无统计学意义[RR =0.97,95％CI (0.90～1.05),P＝0.47].结论 阿仑膦酸钠能增加患者腰椎和股骨颈BMD,且不良反应低,还没有证据表明可以降低骨折风险.今后,尚需要开展大样本RCT观察阿仑膦酸钠对股骨BMD的影响是否与用药时间有关以及进一步探索其能否降低骨折发生率.     

The effect of montelukast (10mg daily) and loratadine (10mg daily) on wheal, flare and itching reactions in skin prick tests

Antileukotriene agents are widely used for the treatment of allergic conditions including bronchial asthma and allergic rhinitis. The influence of montelukast on skin reactivity has not been clearly evaluated. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of montelukast on wheal, flare and itching in skin prick tests (SPTs). METHODS: Fifteen atopic patients (5 women and 10 men) with average age 28.04 (SD+/-8.24) were tested with histamine, codeine, negative control solution and allergen extract (grasses). Montelukast (10mg), loratadine (10mg) or placebo were given to the volunteers for 5 days in a double-blind manner, followed by SPT, with 14 days of wash-out period. RESULTS: There was no differences in wheal, flare and itching (p=0.205; 0.086 and 0.069, respectively, Wilcoxon rank-sum test) between SPT performed after placebo and wash-out period. The analysis revealed a statistically significant suppression of wheal and flare by loratadine (p<0.05 for all tested solutions). Pre-treatment with montelukast did not influence wheal size (p=0.099, 0.21, 0.066 for histamine, codeine and allergens, respectively), but significantly reduced flare (p=0.005; 0.003; 0.02 for histamine, codeine and allergens, respectively). We found a significant suppression of itching produced by montelukast (p=0.02) and loratadine (p=0.03) as compared to placebo (p=0.068 vs. wash out). CONCLUSIONS: Our data show a tendency to suppressive effect of montelukast on flare and itching but not on wheal which is basic for SPT interpretation. We conclude that found suppression have little impact on clinical effectiveness of SPT as a diagnostic tool.     

Alendronate in the treatment of primary hyperparathyroid-related osteoporosis: a 2-year study

We investigated the effect of alendronate on calcium, PTH, and bone mineral density in 27 female and 5 male patients with primary hyperparathyroidism. The treatment group [n = 14; T score < or = -2.5 SD at the femoral neck (FN) or T < or = -1.0 SD plus previous nonvertebral fracture] was given alendronate 10 mg/d for 24 months. The second group (n = 18; T score > -2.5 SD at the FN) was untreated. Biochemistry was repeated at 1.5, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months, and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry at 12 and 24 months. There were no significant between-group baseline differences in calcium, creatinine, or PTH. Alendronate-treated patients gained bone at all sites [lumbar spine (LS), 1 yr gain, +7.3 +/- 1.7%; P < 0.001; 2 yr, +7.3 +/- 3.1%; P = 0.04). Untreated patients gained bone at the LS over 2 yr (+4.0 +/- 1.8%; P = 0.03) but lost bone elsewhere. Calcium fell nonsignificantly in the alendronate group between baseline (2.84 +/- 0.12 mmol/liter) and 6 wk (2.76 +/- 0.09 mmol/liter), with a nonsignificant rise in PTH (baseline, 103.5 +/- 14.6 ng/liter; 6 wk, 116.7 +/- 15.6 ng/liter). By 3 months, values had reverted to baseline. In primary hyperparathyroidism, alendronate is well tolerated and significantly improves bone mineral density at the LS (with lesser gains at FN and radius), especially within the first year of treatment. Short-term changes in calcium and PTH resolve by 3 months.     

Alendronate reduces the daily consumption of insulin (DCI) in patients with senile type I diabetes and osteoporosis

The use of Alendronate for the treatment of senile diabetes with osteopenia or osteoporosis is a common practice today, although the reasons for the success of this treatment are not completely understood. We investigated 40 elderly female patients, over 70 years of age, divided in two Groups (A and B) 20 cases of each, with insulin-dependent senile diabetes and fair metabolic balance, with an average disease duration of 30 +/- 4 years. They all had osteoporosis shown by the mean T-score of bone mineral densitometry. The Groups were treated as follows, Group A with 10 mg/day of Alendronate per os, with morning fasting plus a supplementation of calcium and vitamin D3, while the Group B received only calcium and vitamin D3 per os. Bone mineral density (BMD) expressed in mg/cm2, and in terms of T-score and Z-score at the spine (L1-L4) was monitored over time after 12 and 24 months, using dexa technique with a Lunar DPX densitometer. Moreover, the variation of daily consumption of insulin (DCI) of all the study population was calculated 12 and 24 months after the start of treatments. The data of Group A showed an improvement of osteoporosis, as evidenced by the increase of BMD at both times of measurement, accompanied by a significant reduction in the DCI (-21.6% by the 12th month, and -36.2% by the end of the observation period). In the Group B only small, statistically insignificant changes were observed in both the BMD and DCI. The most plausible explanation of reduction of DCI in Group A seems to be that Alendronate has improved the clinical symptoms of osteoporosis (pain, rigidity, and reduction of movements) through its action on the bone mass recovery and slowing down the bone turnover and under these conditions the diabetic patients improved their own physical performance. The better and more extensive movements certainly produced a reduction in the DCI, since a correct and adequate physical activity does contribute to an improved glucose metabolism.     

Omeprazole 20 mg three days a week and 10 mg daily in prevention of duodenal ulcer relapse. Double-blind comparative trial

In a double-blind, parallel-group clinical trial of 195 patients with duodenal ulcers who after a short-term study had relief of pain and healed ulcers proved endoscopically, 65 were randomized to receive 20 mg omeprazole 3 days a week (once in the morning from Friday to Sunday), 64 to receive 10 mg omeprazole once daily in the morning, and 66 to receive placebo for up to 6 months. The patients underwent repeat endoscopy with biopsy of the gastric fundic mucosa (qualitative assessment of argyrophilic cell population), assessment of symptoms, and laboratory screening with measurement of basal serum gastrin concentrations at 3 and 6 months or more often if indicated by recurrence of symptoms. At 3 months, endoscopically proved ulcer relapse occurred in 16% receiving 20 mg omeprazole 3 days a week; 21% receiving 10 mg omeprazole daily; and 50% receiving placebo. At 6 months, corresponding rates were 23%, 27%, and 67% with 95% confidence intervals of difference between the placebo group and omeprazole groups of 28%-60% and 24%-56% (P less than 0.00001), respectively, and between omeprazole groups of -19%-11% (NS). No major clinical or laboratory side effects were noted. Thus both omeprazole regimens are effective and safe in preventing duodenal ulcer relapse.     

Fracture risk reduction with alendronate in women with osteoporosis: the Fracture Intervention Trial. FIT Research Group

We examined the effect of alendronate treatment for 3-4 yr on risk of new fracture among 3658 women with osteoporosis enrolled in the Fracture Intervention Trial. This cohort included women with existing vertebral fracture and those with osteoporosis as defined by T score of less than -2.5 at the femoral neck but without vertebral fracture. All analyses were prespecified in the data analysis plan. The magnitudes of reduction of fracture incidence with alendronate were similar in both groups. The two groups were, therefore, pooled to obtain a more precise estimate of the effect of alendronate on relative risk of fracture (relative risk, 95% confidence interval): hip (0.47, 0.26-0.79), radiographic vertebral (0.52, 0.42-0.66), clinical vertebral (0.55, 0.36-0.82), and all clinical fractures (0.70, 0.59-0.82). Reductions in risk of clinical fracture were statistically significant by 12 months into the trial. We conclude that reductions in fracture risk during treatment with alendronate are consistent in women with existing vertebral fractures and those without such fractures but with bone mineral density in the osteoporotic range. Furthermore, reduction in risk is evident early in the course of treatment. This pooled analysis provides a more precise estimate of the antifracture efficacy of alendronate in women with osteoporosis than that in prior reports.