Duplex ultrasound velocity criteria for the stented carotid artery

OBJECTIVES: Ultrasound velocity criteria for the diagnosis of in-stent restenosis in patients undergoing carotid artery stenting (CAS) are not well established. In the present study, we test whether ultrasound velocity measurements correlate with increasing degrees of in-stent restenosis in patients undergoing CAS and develop customized velocity criteria to identify residual stenosis > or =20%, in-stent restenosis > or =50%, and high-grade in-stent restenosis > or =80%. METHODS: Carotid angiograms performed at the completion of CAS were compared with duplex ultrasound (DUS) imaging performed immediately after the procedure. Patients were followed up with annual DUS imaging and underwent both ultrasound scans and computed tomography angiography (CTA) at their most recent follow-up visit. Patients with suspected high-grade in-stent restenosis on DUS imaging underwent diagnostic carotid angiograms. DUS findings were therefore available for comparison with luminal stenosis measured by carotid angiograms or CTA in all these patients. The DUS protocol included peak-systolic (PSV) and end-diastolic velocity (EDV) measurements in the native common carotid artery (CCA), proximal stent, mid stent, distal stent, and distal internal carotid artery (ICA). RESULTS: Of 255 CAS procedures that were reviewed, 39 had contralateral ICA stenosis and were excluded from the study. During a mean follow-up of 4.6 years (range, 1 to 10 years), 23 patients died and 64 were lost. Available for analysis were 189 pairs of ultrasound and procedural carotid angiogram measurements; 99 pairs of ultrasound and CTA measurements during routine follow-up; and 29 pairs of ultrasound and carotid angiograms measurements during follow-up for suspected high-grade in-stent restenosis > or =80% (n = 310 pairs of observations, ultrasound vs carotid angiograms/CTA). The accuracy of CTA vs carotid angiograms was confirmed (r(2) = 0.88) in a subset of 19 patients. Post-CAS PSV (r(2) = .85) and ICA/CCA ratios (r(2) = 0.76) correlated most with the degree of stenosis. Receiver operating characteristic analysis demonstrated the following optimal threshold criteria: residual stenosis > or =20% (PSV >or =150 cm/s and ICA/CCA ratio > or =2.15), in-stent restenosis > or =50% (PSV > or =220 cm/s and ICA/CCA ratio > or =2.7), and in-stent restenosis > or =80% (PSV 340 cm/s and ICA/CCA ratio > or =4.15). CONCLUSIONS: Progressively increasing PSV and ICA/CCA ratios correlate with evolving restenosis within the stented carotid artery. Ultrasound velocity criteria developed for native arteries overestimate the degree of in-stent restenosis encountered. These changes persist during long-term follow-up and across all grades of in-stent restenosis after CAS. The proposed new velocity criteria accurately define residual stenosis >or =20%, in-stent restenosis >or =50%, and high-grade in-stent restenosis > or =80% in the stented carotid artery.     

B-mode ultrasound measurement of carotid bifurcation stenoses: is it reliable?

In the majority of cases, duplex ultrasonography (DU) is the sole imaging study necessary before carotid interventions. Duplex-derived internal carotid artery (ICA) peak systolic velocity (PSV), ICA end-diastolic velocity (EDV) and ICA/common carotid artery (CCA) PSV ratio are the most commonly utilized parameters for predicting critical carotid stenoses. However, the role of direct B-mode image measurement of maximal ICA narrowing is ill defined. The images and records of 192 patients who underwent both arteriography and duplex ultrasonography (DU) of 375 carotid arteries from January 1995 to November 2000 were reviewed. All DUs were performed by registered vascular technologists (n=6). Maximum arteriographic stenosis was determined according to the NASCET study design. With arteriography as the "gold standard," B-mode image (BMI) measurement of the maximal ICA luminal narrowing relative to the carotid bulb (n=162)as well as the peak systolic velocity in the internal carotid artery (PSVICA) (n=330), end-diastolic velocity in the internal carotid artery (EDV(ICA)) (n=198), and the ratio of the PSVs in both the ICA and the CCA (PSVICA/CCA) ratio (n=319) were subjected to receiver operator characteristics (ROC) curves for 3 clinically relevant stenoses thresholds: 50-99%, 60-99%, and 70-99%. A strong correlation was found between B-mode image (BMI)and the NASCET arteriographic measures of carotid stenosis (r =0.80;p<0.001) and was similar among the 6 technologists (r =0.74-0.89;p>0.2). The overall accuracy of BMI measurement to diagnose 50%, 60%,and 70% arteriographic carotid stenosis was 85.3%, 82.2%, and 87%, respectively. BMI measurement was similar to the most accurate PSV(ICA), EDV(ICA), and PSV(ICA/CCA) ratio at all 3 threshold stenoses levels (p>0.3). When combined with the velocity criteria, BMI measurement improved the positive predictive value (PPV) for all arteriographic stenoses thresholds by an average of 12.6% for PSV(ICA), 21.2% for EDV(ICA), and 14.2% for PSV(ICA/CCA) ratio. BMI measurement of carotid bifurcation narrowing is as reliable as duplex-derived velocity criteria in evaluating clinically relevant threshold ICA stenoses. The routine use of B-mode ultrasound in conjunction with the velocity parameters enhances the PPV of carotid DU. Our experience suggests that with current refinements in B-mode resolution, BMI stenosis measurements are accurate among experienced technologists and are a useful adjunct to duplex-derived velocity parameters.     

Carotid duplex velocity criteria revisited for the diagnosis of carotid in-stent restenosis

Carotid percutaneous transluminal angioplasty/stenting has become an accepted treatment modality for carotid artery stenosis in high-risk patients. There has been an ongoing debate regarding which duplex ultrasound (DUS) criteria to use to determine the rate of in-stent restenosis. This prospective study revisits DUS criteria for determining the rate of in-stent restenosis. In analyzing a subset of 12 patients (pilot study) who had both completion carotid angiography and DUS within 30 days, 10 patients with normal post-stenting carotid angiography (< 30% residual stenosis) had peak systolic velocities (PSVs) of the stented internal carotid artery (ICA) of < or = 155 cm/s and two patients with > or = 30% residual stenosis had internal carotid artery (ICA) PSVs of > 155 cm/s. Eighty-three patients who underwent carotid stenting as part of clinical trials were analyzed. All patients underwent post-stenting carotid DUS that was done at 1 month and every 6 months thereafter. PSVs and end-diastolic velocities of the ICA and common carotid artery were recorded. Patients with PSVs of the ICA of > 140 cm/s underwent carotid computed tomographic (CT) angiography. The perioperative stroke rate was 1.2%. When the old DUS velocity criteria for nonstented carotid arteries were applied, 54% of patients had > or = 30% restenosis (PSV of > 120 cm/s), but when our new proposed DUS velocity criteria for stented arteries were applied (PSV of > 155 cm/s), 33% had > or = 30% restenosis at a mean follow-up of 18 months (p = .007). The mean PSVs for patients with normal stented carotid arteries based on CT angiography, were 122 cm/s versus 243 cm/s for > or = 30% restenosis and 113 cm/s versus 230 cm/s for > or = 30% restenosis based on our new criteria. The mean PSVs of in-stent restenosis of 30 to < 50%, 50 to < 70%, and 70 to 99%, based on CT angiography, were 205 cm/s, 264 cm/s, and 435 cm/s, respectively. Receiver operating curve analysis demonstrated that an ICA PSV of > 155 cm/s was optimal for detecting > or = 30% in-stent restenosis, with a sensitivity of 100%, a specificity of 90%, a positive predictive value of 74%, and a negative predictive value of 100%. The currently used carotid DUS velocity criteria overestimated the incidence of in-stent restenosis. We propose new velocity criteria for the ICA PSV of > 155 cm/s to define > or = 30% in-stent restenosis.     

Ultrasound criteria for severe in-stent restenosis following carotid artery stenting

PURPOSE: In-stent restenosis (ISR) is a known complication following carotid artery stenting (CAS). However, ultrasound criteria determining ISR are not well established. We evaluated alternative ultrasound velocity criteria for >70% ISR in our institution. METHODS: Clinical records of 256 patients undergoing 282 consecutive CAS procedures over a 42-month period were reviewed. Follow-up ultrasounds were available for analysis in 237 patients. Selective angiograms and repeat interventions were performed for >70% ISR. Ultrasound criteria including peak systolic velocity (PSV), end diastolic velocity (EDV), and internal carotid to common carotid artery ratios (ICA/CCA) were examined. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated for PSV (200, 250, 300, 350, and 400 cm/s), EDV (70, 80, 90, 100 cm/s), and CCA/ICA (3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 5). RESULTS: Twenty-two carotid angiograms were performed and 18 lesions had confirmations of >70% ISR in 11 patients including prior CEA in five patients and neck irradiation in two patients. Receiver operator characteristics (ROC) was analyzed for PSV, EDV, and CCA/ICA ratio. For 70% or greater angiographic ISR, PSV > 300 cm/s correlated to a 94% sensitivity, 50% specificity, 90% positive predictive value (PPV), and 67% negative predictive value (NPV); EDV > 90 cm/s correlated to an 89% sensitivity, 100% specificity, 100% PPV, and 67% NPV; and ICA/CCA > 4 had a 94.4% sensitivity, 75% specificity, 94% PPV, and 75% NPV. A significant color flow disturbance was detected in one patient who did not meet the aforementioned ultrasound velocity criteria. Further statistical analysis showed that an EDV of 90 cm/s provided the best discriminant value. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrated that PSV > 300 cm/s, EDV > 90 cm/s, and ICA/CCA > 4 correlated well with >70% ISR. Although still rudimentary, these velocity criteria combined with color flow patterns can reliably predict severe ISR in our vascular laboratory. However, due to the relatively infrequent cases of severe ISR following CAS, a multicentered study is warranted to establish standard post-CAS ultrasound surveillance criteria for severe ISR.     

Carotid artery stenting: is there a need to revise ultrasound velocity criteria?

OBJECTIVES: Ultrasound (US) velocity criteria have not been well-established for patients undergoing carotid artery stenting (CAS). A potential source of error in using US after CAS is that reduced compliance in the stented artery may result in elevated velocity relative to the native artery. We measured arterial compliance in the stented artery, and developed customized velocity criteria for use early after CAS. METHODS: US was performed before and within 3 days after CAS, and after 1 month in a subset of 26 patients. Post-procedural peak systolic velocity (PSV) and end-diastolic velocity (EDV) of the internal carotid artery (ICA), PSV/EDV ratio, and internal carotid artery to common carotid artery ratio (ICA/CCA) were recorded. These were compared with degree of in-stent residual stenosis determined at carotid angiography performed at the completion of CAS. Peterson's elastic modulus (Ep) and compliance (Cp) of the ICA were determined in a subgroup of 20 patients at the distal end of the stent and in the same region in the native ICA before stenting. RESULTS: Ninety CAS procedures were analyzed. Mean (+/-SD) angiographic residual stenosis after CAS was 5.4 +/- 9.1%, whereas corresponding PSV by US was 120.4 +/- 32.4 cm/s; EDV, 41.4 +/- 18.6 cm/s; PSV/EDV ratio, 3.3 +/- 1.2; and ICA/CCA ratio, 1.6 +/- 0.5. PSV was unchanged at 1 month. Post-CAS PSV and ICA/CCA ratio correlated most with degree of stenosis (P <.0001 for both). Only six patients demonstrated in-stent residual stenosis 20% or greater, but the standard US threshold of PSV 130 cm/s or greater (validated for >20% ICA stenosis in our laboratory) categorized 38 of 90 patients as having stenosis 20% or greater. Receiver operator curve analysis demonstrated that a combined threshold of PSV 150 cm/s or greater and ICA/CCA ratio 2.16 or greater were optimal for detecting residual stenosis of 20% or greater, with sensitivity 100%, specificity 98%, positive predictive value 75%, and negative predictive value 100%. After placement of a stent, the ICA demonstrated significantly increased Ep (1.2 vs 4.4 x 10(3) mm Hg; P =.004) and decreased Cp (9.8 vs 3.2 %mm Hg x 10(-2); P =.0004). CONCLUSIONS: Currently accepted US velocity criteria validated in our laboratory for nonstented ICAs falsely classified several stented ICAs with normal diameter on carotid angiograms as having residual in-stent stenosis 20% or greater. We propose a new criterion that defines PSV less than 150 cm/s, with ICA/CCA ratio less than 2.16, as the best correlate to a normal lumen (0%-19% stenosis) in the recently stented ICA. This was associated with increased stiffness of the stented ICA (increased Ep, decreased Cp). These preliminary results suggest that placement of a stent in the carotid artery alters its biomechanical properties, which may cause an increase in US velocity measurements in the absence of a technical error or residual stenotic disease.     

Duplex scan surveillance after carotid angioplasty and stenting: a rational definition of stent stenosis

OBJECTIVE: A duplex ultrasound (DUS) surveillance algorithm used after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) was applied to patients after carotid stenting and angioplasty (CAS) to determine the incidence of high-grade stent stenosis, its relationship to clinical symptoms, and the outcome of reintervention. METHODS: In 111 patients who underwent 114 CAS procedures for symptomatic (n = 62) or asymptomatic (n = 52) atherosclerotic or recurrent stenosis after CEA involving the internal carotid artery (ICA), DUS surveillance was performed 300 cm/s, diastolic velocity >125 cm/s, internal carotid artery stent/proximal common carotid artery ratio >4) involving the stented arterial segment prompted diagnostic angiography and repair when >75% diameter-reduction stenosis was confirmed. Criteria for >50% CAS stenosis was a PSV >150 cm/s with a PSV stent ratio >2. RESULTS: All 114 carotid stents were patent on initial DUS imaging, including 90 (79%) with PSV <150 cm/s (94 +/- 24 cm/s), 23 (20%) with PSV >150 cm/s (183 +/- 34 cm/s), and one with high-grade, residual stenosis (PSV = 355). During subsequent surveillance, 81 CAS sites (71%) exhibited no change in stenosis severity, nine sites demonstrated stenosis regression to <50% diameter reduction, and five sites developed velocity spectra of a high-grade stenosis. Angiography confirmed >75% diameter reduction in all six CASs with DUS-detected high-grade stenosis, all patients were asymptomatic, and treatment consisted of endovascular (n = 5) or surgical (n = 1) repair. During the mean 33-month follow-up period, three patients experienced ipsilateral, reversible neurologic events at 30, 45, and 120 days after CAS; none was associated with severe stent stenosis. No stent occlusions occurred, and no patient with >50% CAS stenosis on initial or subsequent testing developed a permanent ipsilateral permanent neurologic deficit or stroke-related death. CONCLUSION: DUS surveillance after CAS identified a 5% procedural failure rate due to the development of high-grade in-stent stenosis. Both progression and regression of stent stenosis severity was observed on serial testing, but 70% of CAS sites demonstrated velocity spectra consistent with <50% diameter reduction. The surveillance algorithm used, including reintervention for asymptomatic high-grade CAS stenosis, was associated with stent patency and the absence of disabling stroke.     

New duplex ultrasound scan criteria for managing symptomatic 50% or greater carotid stenosis

PURPOSE: The North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) showed that selected patients benefited from surgery when their carotid artery was 50% or more stenosed. This study assessed the accuracy of color-flow duplex ultrasound scanning (DUS) parameters to detect 50% or greater carotid artery stenosis and to determine the situations in which carotid endarterectomy (CEA) without angiography could be justified. METHODS: From March 1, 1995, to December 1, 1995, all patients considered for CEA were studied with DUS and carotid angiography. Results of the two tests were blindly compared. DUS measurements of internal carotid artery (ICA) peak systolic velocity (PSV), end diastolic velocity, and ratio of the ICA to common carotid artery PSV (ICA/CCA) were subjected to receiver operator characteristic curve analysis to determine the most accurate criterion predicting 50% or greater angiographic stenosis. The criterion for identifying patients for CEA without angiography was selected from criteria with a high positive predictive value (PPV) and sensitivity. RESULTS: A total of 188 carotid bifurcations were available for comparison. A PSV (ICA/CCA) of 2 or higher was the most accurate criterion for detection of 50% or greater stenosis, with an accuracy rate of 93% (sensitivity, 96%; specificity, 89%; PPV, 92%). A PSV (ICA/CCA) of 3.6 or higher was the best criterion for identifying candidates for CEA who had not undergone earlier angiography, with PPV, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy rates of 98%, 77%, 98%, and 86%, respectively. CONCLUSION: These redefined criteria detect the NASCET-defined threshold level of 50% or greater ICA stenosis, above which CEA results in stroke reduction. A management algorithm based on these criteria should help to minimize both angiography and unnecessary intervention.     

Gender differences in blood velocities across carotid stenoses

OBJECTIVES: Carotid duplex scanning is the standard test for documenting carotid disease. Carotid endarterectomy effectively reduces stroke in selected patients with carotid artery disease. Data from large national randomized trials suggest that the benefits of CEA may be gender dependent. Because many diagnoses are made and treatment is based on the results of carotid duplex ultrasound scanning alone, it is important to determine whether different diagnostic thresholds should be used in men and women. The purpose of this study was 2-fold: to examine whether there is an overall gender difference in carotid velocity at similar arteriographic stenoses, and to determine whether there are significant differences at clinically relevant thresholds of disease. METHODS: A database of 938 carotid arteriogram entries was established prospectively, with accompanying measurements of peak systolic velocity (PSV) and end-diastolic velocity (EDV). The percent of internal carotid artery stenosis seen on arteriograms was calculated according to criteria from the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial. Analyses were made in 536 carotid arteries in men and 402 carotid arteries in women. In addition, the single most diseased artery per patient was analyzed by gender. PSV and EDV were averaged for data subsets according to 10% intervals of internal carotid artery stenoses. Velocity for each interval was compared between men and women with the Student t test. Receiver operator characteristic curves were developed to define optimal duplex criteria for 60% and 70% stenosis. RESULTS: For all intervals, PSV and EDV averaged 9% and 6% higher, respectively, in women than in men. Significant gender differences existed between PSV and EDV for 60% and 70% stenosis (P = .03). When a single vessel per patient was analyzed these observations persisted, but lost significance for PSV at 60% stenosis (P = .18). Receiver operator characteristic curves at 90% sensitivity demonstrated that optimal PSV for 60% stenosis was 160 cm/s and 180 cm/s, and for 70% stenosis was 185 cm/s and 202 cm/s, in male and female patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Women have higher carotid blood flow velocity than men do. Gender differences exist, and are notably different at clinically relevant thresholds for intervention. These data indicate that different criteria should be used for interpreting carotid velocity profiles in women than in men, and have potentially important implications for patient care.     

Effect of contralateral disease on duplex measurements of internal carotid artery stenosis

BACKGROUND: Duplex ultrasonography is increasingly used as the sole method of imaging before carotid endarterectomy. This study investigated the measured degree of stenosis in the contralateral carotid artery before and after operation. METHODS: Duplex-derived peak systolic velocity (PSV), end-diastolic velocity (EDV) and internal carotid artery/common carotid artery (ICA/CCA) velocity ratios were measured in the contralateral unoperated ICA before 131 consecutive unilateral endarterectomies and compared with preoperative angiographic findings. Three months later duplex scans were repeated to assess whether there had been any alteration in the severity of the stenosis in the contralateral unoperated artery. RESULTS: Bilateral ICA disease (greater than 50 per cent stenosis) was present in 50 patients (38 per cent). Three months after operation, ultrasonography of the 105 unoperated, patent, contralateral arteries showed a decrease in mean(s.d.) PSV (1.21(0. 83) versus 1.07(0.69) m/s; P < 0.01) and EDV (0.41(0.29) versus 0. 35(0.24) m/s; P < 0.01). This resulted in 14 (42 per cent) of 33 patients with contralateral disease being downgraded to a less severe category of stenosis. Use of the ICA/CCA velocity ratio prevented overestimation in eight of the 14 patients, while preoperative angiography correctly classified 13 of the 14 patients. CONCLUSION: Bilateral carotid artery disease can cause overestimation of the severity of stenosis by duplex ultrasonography if absolute velocity is used as the main criterion.     

Grading of internal carotid artery stenosis: validation of Doppler/duplex ultrasound criteria and angiography against endarterectomy specimen.

OBJECTIVES: duplex ultrasound has replaced angiography prior to carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in many institutions. However, the indications for CEA are based on angiographically controlled studies and widely accepted ultrasound criteria do not exist. Consequently, the reliability of Doppler and/or duplex ultrasound to predict a high-grade ICA stenosis has to be proven. DESIGN: prospective validation study. MATERIALS: one hundred and fifty carotid bifurcations assessed by ultrasound and selective angiography and 68 acrylat outcasts of carotid specimen after eversion CEA. METHODS: ICA stenosis was measured angiographically according to the ECST criteria. Combined Doppler acoustic standard criteria (CDASC), peak systolic frequency (PSF), peak systolic velocity (PSV) and end-diastolic velocity (EDV) served as criteria for the ultrasound assessment. These criteria and the results of angiography were compared to the degree of ICA stenosis determined by specimen measurements. RESULTS: the median degree of ICA stenosis as assessed by angiography (82%, range 56-97%) and CDASC (83%, range 50-99%) corresponded well to the specimen measurements (80%, range 50-95%). The sensitivity of angiography and CDASC to predict a 70-90% ICA stenosis (ECST criteria) compared to the specimen measurements was 88% and 95%, respectively. The positive predictive value (PPV) reached 92% and 96%, respectively. CDASC were equivalent to angiography and were superior to the best single frequency or velocity parameters. If CDASC do not indicate a >/=70% ICA stenosis in spite of a PSV >/=180 cm/s and/or an EDV >/=50 cm/s, angiography may detect patients with a >70% ICA stenosis. CONCLUSIONS: CDASC are valid in the quantification of high-grade ICA stenosis. They are more reliable than single velocity and/or frequency measurements. However, if velocity criteria and CDASC do not agree, angiography should be performed.     

MR-angiography and duplex-ultrasonography: predictive reliability for angiographically determined internal carotid artery stenosis >/= 70-99%

PURPOSE: A prospective study was undertaken to evaluate whether digital subtraction angiography (DSA) which is still associated with a substantial morbidity can be replaced by less invasive diagnostic modalities such as duplex scanning (DS) and magnetic resonance angiography (MR-A) for the detection of angiographically defined internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis >/= 70 %. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 47 patients with suspected severe ICA stenosis underwent examination of their carotid arteries using duplex studies, MR-A and DSA. According to the study protocol, the arteriographic diameter reduction (DR) >/= 70 % which had to be predicted by DS and MR-A was determined following the NASCET criteria. RESULTS: Stroke rate following DSA amounted to 2.1 %. In 94 carotid arteries studied by DSA 34 times a DR >/= 70 % was found. Using ROC curve for determining optimal discriminant value, duplex-derived peak systolic velocity (PSV) >/= 250 cm/s provided a sensitivity of 94.1 %, a specificity of 80 %, a positive predictive value (PPV) of 72.7 % and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 96 % to characterise an ICA stenosis >/= 70 %. Due to an inadequate PPV, PSV failed to suffice as the sole preoperative diagnostic modality even if different PSV velocity cut points were applied. On the other hand, end diastolic velocity (EDV) >/= 150 cm/s provided a PPV of 100 % thereby identifying 16/34 ICA stenoses >/= 70 % in our study. MR-A showed a sensitivity of 91.2 %, a specificity of 88.3 %, a PPV of 81.6 %, and a NPV of 94.6 % to predict an ICA stenosis >/= 70 %. CONCLUSION: In our series, both duplex-derived PSV as well as MR-A provided high sensitivity to detect surgically relevant ICA stenosis. However, to select patients for surgery inclusion of EDV proved to be important due to a high PPV and may spare conventional angiography half of patients with stenosis exceeding 70 %.     

Grading internal carotid artery stenosis using B-mode ultrasound (in vivo study)

OBJECTIVE: to determine the value of percentage area and diameter reduction in grading ICA stenosis using colour-coded B-mode transverse ultrasonic images. MATERIALS AND METHODS: measurement of the percentage area and diameter reduction of the common carotid, external carotid and internal carotid (at the point of maximum stenosis) were performed, using duplex scanning with colour-flow imaging preoperatively, in 33 patients (six patients were excluded). The duplex measurements were compared to the percentage area and diameter reduction from transverse section of the specimens. Peak systolic (PSV) and end-diastolic velocities (EDV) were measured at the proximal CCA and ICA within the jet of turbulence. A mm scale was placed next to the specimen block, which was captured by video. The area reduction was measured by playing the video and using the same duplex software. RESULTS: linear-regression analysis of the percentage area reduction of the in vivo against the specimen measurements showed a good linear relationship (r=0.9047). The in vivo duplex measurements had 95% confidence interval (CI) of 8% (95% CI of diameter reduction 5%). CONCLUSION: using the gold standard of fixed histological endarterectomy specimen, the results indicate that transverse image obtained with colour B-mode imaging is more appropriate in determining the degree of stenosis.     

The importance of Doppler angle of insonation on differentiation between 50-69% and 70-99% carotid artery stenosis.

AIM: to investigate the importance of Doppler angle differentiating between 50-69% and >/=70% internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: fifty-one patients with a previous diagnosis of 50-69% ICA stenosis (n =53) were re-evaluated by duplex scanning. Spectral Doppler velocity waveforms were obtained from common carotid (CCA), ICA and external (ECA) carotid arteries with the same Doppler angle of insonation as used at the initial duplex scanning, followed by repeated measurements with a fixed 60 degrees angle of insonation. RESULTS: the peak systolic velocity (PSV) in the ICA was 181+/-55 cm/s (mean+/-SD) at the second duplex scanning when the same angle of insonation (mean 46 degrees +/-9) was used as during the initial investigation. When the examination was done with a 60 degrees angle of insonation, PSV ICA was 261+/-96 cm/s (mean+/-SD). In fifteen arteries the estimated degree of ICA stenosis changed from 50-69% to 70-99% due to the application of a fixed Doppler angle of insonation at 60 degrees. CONCLUSION: the Doppler angle of insonation has a significant effect on spectral Doppler velocity measurements. It is crucial that duplex criteria are standardised with a fixed angle of insonation and that this angle is consistently used during velocity estimations.     

Comparison of Intraoperative and Postoperative Duplex Ultrasound for Carotid Endarterectomy

Intraoperative (IO) duplex ultrasound (DU) is used to identify correctable technical defects at the time of carotid endarterectomy (CEA). Postoperative (p.o.) DU is used to evaluate recurrent or residual stenosis. We compared IO and p.o. DU to determine the value and significance of these studies in the management of patients undergoing CEA. We performed completion IO DU following CEA and p.o. DU a mean of 8 weeks after surgery in 78 patients. IO studies were performed by the operating surgeon and p.o. studies were performed in an accredited vascular laboratory. Peak systolic velocity (PSV) was measured in the internal carotid (ICA), external carotid, and common carotid (CCA) arteries. The criteria used for an abnormal study were an ICA PSV > 150 cm/sec and a ratio of ICA to CCA PSVs(ICA/CCA) > 3.0. Completion angiograms were also performed on all patients intraoperatively. Technical defects identified on DU or angiogram were corrected whenever possible. From our results, we concluded that in many patients, early p.o. DU will demonstrate an elevated ICA PSV compared to the IO PSV. If the ICA/CCA remains normal, this increase is unlikely to represent a clinically relevant recurrent or residual stenosis. A postoperative ICA/CCA ratio > 3.0 may be a more reliable indicator of significant stenosis and a lesion that is likely to progress or occlude than PSVs alone.     

Is a single preoperative duplex scan sufficient for planning bilateral carotid endarterectomy?

PURPOSE: Duplex scanning is often the sole imaging study before carotid endarterectomy (CEA). Patients with bilateral severe internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis may be considered for bilateral CEA. High-grade ICA stenosis, however, may artifactually elevate velocity measurements used to quantify stenosis in the contralateral ICA. It is unknown whether ipsilateral CEA will influence duplex determination of the presence of a contralateral 60% to 99% ICA stenosis. This study was performed to determine whether a single preoperative duplex scan is sufficient to plan bilateral CEA. METHODS: Preoperative and early postoperative carotid duplex scans in patients with bilateral ICA stenosis who underwent unilateral CEA were reviewed. Changes in duplex scans that determined stenosis in the ICA contralateral to the CEA were analyzed. Previously validated criteria used to determine 60% to 99% ICA stenosis were a peak systolic velocity (PSV) of 260 cm/sec or more combined with an end diastolic velocity (EDV) of 70 cm/sec or more. RESULTS: Over an 8-year period, 460 patients underwent CEA; 107 patients (23.3%) had an asymptomatic 50% to 99% contralateral ICA stenosis by standard criteria (PSV, >125 cm/sec) and an early postoperative duplex scan examination. Of these 107 patients, 38 patients (35.5%) had duplex scan criteria for 60% to 99% contralateral ICA stenosis. In these 38 patients, there was a mean postoperative PSV decrease of 47.7 cm/sec (10.1%) and a mean EDV decrease of 36.0 cm/sec (19.3%) in the ICA contralateral to the CEA. Eight of 38 (21.1%) preoperative contralateral 60% to 99% ICA lesions were reclassified as less than 60% on postoperative duplex scanning. Six of 69 (8.7%) preoperative lesions of less than 60% were reclassified as 60% to 99% on postoperative duplex scan. These six preoperative examinations were all close to the criteria for 60% to 99% stenosis (mean PSV, 232.5 cm/sec; mean EDV, 62.5 cm/sec). CONCLUSION: One-fifth of patients with apparent 60% to 99% contralateral ICA lesions before the operation have less than 60% stenosis when restudied with duplex scan after unilateral CEA. Lesions below but near the cutoff for 60% to 99% may be reclassified as 60% to 99% on the postoperative duplex scan. These findings mandate that when duplex scanning is used as the sole imaging modality before CEA, patients with severe bilateral carotid stenosis must have an additional carotid duplex examination before operation on the second side.     

Color-flow duplex scanning of carotid arteries: New velocity criteria based on receiver operator characteristic analysis for threshold stenoses used in the symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid trials

Purpose: Duplex scanning has become the standard for noninvasive evaluation of carotid arteries. However, current ultrasound criteria for internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis (16% to 49%, 50% to 79%, 80% to 99%) may not be applicable to the categories (30% to 49%, 50% to 69%, 70% to 99%) used in ongoing symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid endarterectomy trials. This study was undertaken to determine new velocity criteria consistent with these categories.Methods: From January 1, 1989 through October 30, 1992, 5871 color-flow duplex scans were obtained in our laboratories. After inadequate arteriograms and patients with a contralateral ICA occlusion were excluded, 770 peak systolic velocity (PSV) and 229 end-diastolic velocity (EDV) measurements were available for comparison with arteriography. ICA PSV and EDV were subjected to receiver operator characteristic curve analysis to determine optimum criteria for identifying stenoses of 30%, 50%, and 70%.Results: For 70% to 99% carotid artery stenosis, PSV greater than 130 plus EDV greater than 100 provided the best sensitivity (81%), specificity (98%), positive predictive value (89%), negative predictive value (96%), and overall accuracy (95%). For 50% to 69% stenosis, a PSV greater than 130 and EDV of 100 or less cm/sec proved to be the best combination: sensitivity (92%), specificity (97%), positive predictive value (93%), negative predictive value (99%), and accuracy (97%). Stenoses in the 30% to 49% range were less accurately identified.Conclusion: These redefined criteria may prove useful for analyzing duplex ultrasound velocity data in reference to the classification of ICA stenosis used in recent clinical trials of the safety and efficacy of carotid endarterectomy. (J VASC SURG 1994;19:818-28.)     

Optimizing duplex follow-up in patients with an asymptomatic internal carotid artery stenosis of less than 60%

OBJECTIVES: The Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study established benefit of carotid endarterectomy for 60% to 99% asymptomatic internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis. Optimal follow-up intervals to detect progression from < 60% to 60%-99% ICA stenosis are unknown. In a previous study from our laboratory, we found that ICAs with < 60% stenosis and peak systolic velocities (PSVs) of 175 cm/s or more on initial duplex were at high risk for progression. Prospective evaluation of this hypothesis and determination of optimal duplex follow-up intervals for asymptomatic patients with < 60% ICA stenosis form the basis of this report. METHODS: All patients who underwent initial carotid duplex examination for any indication since January 1, 1995, with at least one patent, asymptomatic, previously nonoperated ICA with < 60% stenosis; with 6 months' or greater follow-up; and with one or more repeat duplex examinations were entered into the study. On the basis of the initial duplex examination, ICAs were classified into two groups: those with a PSV less than 175 cm/s and those with a PSV of 175 cm/s or more. Follow-up duplex examinations were performed at varying intervals to detect progression from < 60% to 60%-99% ICA stenosis with criteria previously reported (both PSV > or = 260 cm/s and end-diastolic velocity > or = 70 cm/s). RESULTS: A total of 407 patients (640 asymptomatic ICAs with < 60% stenosis) underwent serial duplex scans (mean follow-up, 22 months). Three ICAs (0.5%) became symptomatic and progressed to 60%-99% ICA stenosis at a mean of 21 months (all transient ischemic attacks), whereas four other ICAs occluded without stroke during follow-up. Progression to 60%-99% stenosis without symptoms was detected in 46 ICAs (7%) (mean, 18 months). Of the 633 patent asymptomatic arteries, 548 ICAs (87%) had initial PSVs less than 175 cm/s, and 85 ICAs (13%) had initial PSVs of 175 cm/s or more. Asymptomatic progression to 60%-99% ICA stenosis occurred in 22 (26%) of 85 ICAs with initial PSVs of 175 cm/s or more, whereas 24 (4%) of 548 ICAs with initial PSVs less than 175 cm/s progressed (P <.0001). The Kaplan-Meier method was used to determine freedom from progression at 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months, which was 95%, 83%, and 70% for ICAs with initial PSVs of 175 cm/s or more versus 100%, 99%, and 95%, respectively, for ICAs with initial PSVs less than 175 cm/s (P <.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with < 60% ICA stenosis and PSVs of 175 cm/s or more on initial duplex examination are significantly more likely to progress asymptomatically to 60%-99% ICA stenosis, and progression is sufficiently frequent to warrant follow-up duplex studies at 6-month intervals. Patients with < 60% ICA stenosis and initial PSVs less than 175 cm/s may have follow-up duplex examinations safely deferred for 2 years.     

Results using a self-expanding stent alone in the treatment of severe symptomatic carotid bifurcation stenosis

OBJECT: Conventional endovascular therapy for carotid stenosis involves placement of an embolic protection device followed by stent insertion and angioplasty. A simpler approach may be placement of a stent alone. The authors determined how often this approach could be used to treat patients with carotid stenosis, and assessed which factors would preclude this approach. METHODS: Over a period of 6 years, 97 patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis were treated with the intention of using a "stent-only" approach. Arteries in 77 patients (79%) were treated with stents alone, 13 required preinsertion balloon dilation, 6 postinsertion dilation, and 1 both pre- and postinsertion dilation. RESULTS: The mean stenosis according to North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial criteria was reduced from 82 to 40% in the stent-only group and from 89 to 37% in the stent and balloon angioplasty group. The 30-day stroke and death rate was 7.2%. Patients were followed for a mean of 15 months. In the stent-alone group, the mean preoperative Doppler peak systolic velocity (PSV) was 409 cm/second, with an internal carotid artery/common carotid artery (ICA/CCA) ratio of 7.2. At follow-up review, the PSV decreased to 153 cm/second and the ICA/CCA ratio to 2.1. In the angioplasty group the mean preoperative PSV was 496 cm/second and the ICA/CCA ratio was 9.2, decreasing to 163 cm/second and 2, respectfully, at follow-up evaluation. Restenosis occurred in 12.8% of patients at 6 months and in 15.9% at 1 year. One stroke occurred during the follow-up period in each group. Using multivariable analysis, factors precluding the "stent-only" approach were as follows: severity of stenosis, circumferential calcification, and no history of hyperlipidemia. CONCLUSIONS: Balloons may not be required to treat all patients with carotid stenosis. A stent alone was feasible in 79% of patients, and 79% of patients were alive and free from ipsilateral stroke or restenosis at 1 year. Restenosis rates with this approach are higher than with conventional angioplasty and stent insertion. Carotid arteries with very severe stenoses (> 90%) and circumferential calcification may be more successfully treated with angioplasty combined with stent placement.     

Duplex Ultrasound Remains a Reliable Test Even After Carotid Stenting

Transluminal arterial stenting reduces vessel compliance and may alter accurate interpretation of flow velocities. We reviewed duplex ultrasonography (DUS) following carotid stenting to identify criteria indicative of severe recurrent stenosis. This is a single-center retrospective review of 158 carotid stenoses treated with carotid angioplasty and stenting (CAS) from April 2001 to December 2004. DUS was obtained preoperatively, postoperatively, and at 3-month intervals thereafter. Peak systolic velocity (PSV) and end diastolic velocity (EDV) were analyzed. Mean follow-up was 12 months (range 1-40). Mean age was 71 ± 9 years (range 51-91; 74% men, 26% women). Three patients (1.9%) developed restenosis and one (0.6%) developed an asymptomatic occlusion during follow-up. Average preoperative PSV was 373 ± 123 cm/sec (mean ± SD) and EDV was 148 ± 63 cm/sec. Immediate postoperative PSV and EDV decreased by an average of 70% (average 118 ± 45 cm/sec) and 72% (average 32 ± 15 cm/sec), respectively. In patients free from restenosis or occlusion, these reductions (range 65-80%) were maintained throughout follow-up and remained within 1-25% of immediate postoperative values. In patients suffering restenosis or occlusion, follow-up PSV and EDV increased 34% and 28%, respectively, compared to preoperative values. PSV and EDV increased by an average of 287% and 500%, respectively, compared to immediate postoperative values. Using criteria of PSV >170 cm/sec and a 50% increase of PSV over immediate postoperative values, restenosis or occlusion was detected with 100% sensitivity and specificity in our patients. Additionally, EDV >120 cm/sec and a 50% increase in EDV over immediate postoperative values detected restenosis and occlusion with 100% sensitivity and specificity. Presumed restenosis and occlusion detected by DUS were confirmed in all cases with angiography. Restenosis or occlusion after CAS at our institution can reliably be detected by carotid duplex using cut-off values of 170 cm/sec PSV, 120 cm/sec EDV, and >50% increase over immediate postoperative values. While these criteria are applied to patients undergoing CAS at our institution, they serve only as suggested guidelines for patient populations at other centers and must be customized to each Intersocietal Commission for the Accreditation of Vascular Laboratories-accredited vascular laboratory. Presented at the Fifteenth Annual Winter Meeting of the Peripheral Vascular Surgery Society, Steamboat Springs, CO, January 28-30, 2005.     

Improvement of carotid blood flow after carotid endarterectomy--evaluation using intraoperative ultrasound flow measurement.

OBJECTIVES: to examine the relationship between the degree of extracranial internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis and changes in the ipsilateral ICA blood flow after carotid endarterectomy (CEA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: in a prospective study we studied 51 patients with unilateral 60-99% ICA stenosis (median degree 84%, asymptomatic stenosis n = 13, symptomatic stenosis n = 38). The degree of ICA diameter stenosis was determined by ex-vivo plastination of the surgically removed atherosclerotic specimen and video-assessed planimetry. Intraoperative transit time ultrasound flow measurements of the carotid arteries were performed before and after CEA. Blood flow changes were assessed by mathematical approximations. Statistics were done by use of the Wilcoxon signed Rank test. RESULTS: common carotid artery (CCA) and ICA median blood flow increased after CEA from 370 and 130 ml/min to 450 and 282 ml/min, respectively (p <.001). The relative increase of ICA blood flow was 5% and 18% for 60-69% and 70-79% ICA stenosis (n.s.) but 70% and 247% for 80-89% and 90-99% stenosis (p <.001 each). Mathematical evaluation (fourth-polynomal function) determined a significant increase of carotid blood flow after CEA in ICA stenosis of > or =82.3%. CONCLUSIONS: in the absence of severe contralateral ICA occlusive disease a significant increase of ipsilateral ICA blood flow by CEA can be expected in patients with an ICA stenosis of > or =82.3% (linear degree of stenosis, ECST criteria).