Pharmacological characterization of the leukocyte kinetics after intranasal antigen challenge in a guinea pig model of allergic rhinitis

OBJECTIVE AND DESIGN: We characterized the leukocyte kinetics after antigen challenge, and investigated the effects of the thromboxane (TX) A2 antagonist seratrodast, the peptide leukotriene (p-LT) antagonist pranlukast, the antihistaminic drug terfenadine and the glucocorticoid dexamethasone on this leukocyte response in a guinea pig model of allergic rhinitis. SUBJECTS: Male Hartley guinea pigs were used. TREATMENT: Intranasally sensitized guinea pigs were challenged once every week for 15 weeks by inhalation of Japanese cedar pollen as the antigen. Dexamethasone and other agents were administered orally 3 and 1 h, respectively, before the 15th challenge. METHODS: The time-related changes in the numbers of differential leukocytes in nasal cavity lavage fluid (NCLF) and in peripheral blood after pollen inhalation challenge were investigated. The effects of the drugs on the antigen-induced changes in the leukocyte counts were evaluated. In addition, histopathological examination of the nasal mucosa was also performed 5 h after the challenge. RESULTS: There was a marked increase in the number of leukocytes in NCLF, especially of eosinophils, which peaked at 5 h, after antigen challenge in this model. This response was also accompanied by the peripheral blood eosinophilia and neutrophilia. Seratrodast (30 mg/kg), pranlukast (30 mg/kg) and dexamethasone (10 mg/kg) inhibited the eosinophilia in all of the blood, the nasal mucosa and NCLF seen 5 h after the antigen challenge. Terfenadine (10 mg/kg) had no apparent effect on the blood and the mucosal eosinophilia, although it tended to suppress the eosinophil accumulation in NCLF. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the present model is useful for analyzing the mechanisms of antigen-induced eosinophilic inflammation in allergic rhinitis and that both TXA2 and p-LTs, but not histamine, contribute to the antigen-induced eosinophilia in this model of allergic rhinitis.     

Effect of oral antigen administration on nasal blockage in experimental allergic rhinitis in guinea pigs

OBJECTIVE AND DESIGN: We evaluated the effectiveness of oral treatment with Japanese cedar pollen on experimental allergic rhinitis in guinea pigs. SUBJECTS: Male Hartley guinea pigs. TREATMENT: From 16 days before the first sensitisation, 1 and 100 mg/time/animal pollen suspension was orally administered twice weekly. Animals were then sensitised and repeatedly challenged with the pollen. METHOD: Guinea pigs were sensitised by intranasal instillation of cedar pollen extracts adsorbed onto Al(OH)3 at a dose of 0.3 microg pollen protein/0.3 mg Al(OH)3/3 microl/nostril twice a day for 7 days. Then the animal was challenged by inhalation with cedar pollen (1.8 mg/nostril) once every week. We evaluated the effects of the oral treatment with antigen on: 1) sneezing frequency, 2) nasal blockage after antigen challenge, 3) nasal hyperresponsiveness to histamine and leukotriene D4, and 4) titres of anaphylactic antibodies. RESULTS: During the course of the high dose administration, several animals died from a possible cytotoxicity, whereas the low dose caused no discernible change. The oral administration of the pollen at both the doses significantly inhibited nasal blockage, and the hyperresponsiveness to the stimuli was also strongly suppressed by the oral treatment. Inhibitory effectiveness did not differ substantially between the 1 and 100 mg/animal-treated groups. In contrast, neither sneezing frequency nor the increasing level of anaphylactic antibodies was influenced by the oral administration. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we found that the pollen-induced nasal blockage and hyperresponsiveness were suppressed by the oral administration of the pollen in the sensitised guinea pig.     

Effect of terfenadine on nasal, eustachian tube, and pulmonary function after provocative intranasal histamine challenge.

Previous studies have documented that intranasal histamine challenge results in nasal and eustachian tube obstruction (ETO) in human volunteers. The purpose of the present study was to assess the effect of pretreatment with terfenadine, a nonsedating antihistamine on the pathophysiologic consequences of intranasal histamine challenge. Fifteen subjects with allergic rhinitis were challenged intranasally with saline and increasing histamine doses (0.01, 0.1, 0.5, 1.0, 5.0, and 10.0 mg) before pretreatment (baseline) and after 1 week of pretreatment with terfenadine, 60 mg b.i.d., terfenadine, 120 mg b.i.d., and placebo. Nasal conductance as measured by posterior rhinomanometry showed a dose-dependent, monotonic decrease following sequential administration of the histamine solutions, but there were no apparent differences in the average responses among the four challenge sessions. The frequency of ETO after histamine challenge was decreased by pretreatment with both doses of terfenadine, although this was not significant. Histamine-induced sneezing and rhinorrhea, but not congestion, were significantly reduced by terfenadine pretreatment. There was no evidence of extension of the histamine effects to the lower airway. The results of the present study suggest that terfenadine, a nonsedating antihistamine, had a favorable effect on sneezing and rhinorrhea after provocative intranasal histamine challenge, but did not significantly attenuate the subjective or objective nasal and ET obstructive responses.     

Important roles of tachykinins in the development of allergic nasal hyperresponsiveness in guinea-pigs

Background Although it has been suggested that the use of tachykinin receptor antagonists might prove to be an effective treatment for allergic rhinitis (AR), they are not used clinically. Therefore, we decided to examine the effects of tachykinin receptor antagonists on AR symptoms in an appropriate experimental model. Objective To evaluate newly developed tachykinin receptor antagonists in a Japanese cedar pollen‐induced AR model and to determine their effect on allergen‐induced sneezing, nasal blockage, and nasal hyperresponsiveness (NHR). Methods Sensitized guinea‐pigs were challenged by forced inhalation of pollen once every week. Sneezing and nasal blockage were observed after pollen challenges. NHR (nasal blockage) to an intranasal application of leukotriene D₄ was assessed 2 days after an antigen challenge. We also evaluated whether intranasal dosing with a tachykinin causes NHR. NK₁ and NK₂ receptor antagonists were administered before an intranasal treatment with antigen or tachykinin. Amounts of tachykinins present in nasal cavity lavage fluid were measured by an enzyme immunoassay. Results Although an NK₁ and NK₂ receptor dual antagonist showed no effect on pollen‐induced sneezing and biphasic nasal blockage, it did completely suppress the development of NHR. Experiments using specific NK₁ or NK₂ receptor antagonists revealed that NK₂ receptor activation was preferentially involved in the development of hyperresponsiveness. Increases in the levels of substance P (SP) and neurokinin A (NKA) in the nasal tissue were noted 20 min–1 h after the challenge. Intranasal instillation of either SP or NKA‐induced NHR, which was almost completely inhibited by NK₂ receptor antagonists and partially inhibited by NK₁ receptor antagonists. Conclusions SP and NKA, which are released early after the challenge, mediate the development of NHR by preferentially activating NK₂ receptors. Therefore, NK₂ receptor antagonists might prove to be effective treatment of AR.     

Elevated nasal mucosal G protein levels and histamine receptor affinity in a guinea pig model of nasal hyperresponsiveness

BACKGROUND: Nasal hyperresponsiveness is a common feature of allergic rhinitis, but the underlying mechanisms have yet to be elucidated. The effects of repeated antigen inhalation on the characteristics of histamine H(1) receptors and expression levels of heterotrimeric guanosine 5'-triphosphate-binding proteins in nasal mucosa were investigated to understand the mechanisms of the pathogenesis of nasal hyperresponsiveness in allergic rhinitis. METHODS: Male Hartley guinea pigs were sensitized by the inhalation of dinitrophenylated ovalbumin antigen (10 mg of protein/ml) and repeatedly challenged by inhaling aerosolized dinitrophenylated ovalbumin antigen for 3 weeks. Twenty-four hours after the last antigen inhalation, in vivo nasal responsiveness to histamine was measured. [(3)H]Mepyramine binding assays and immunoblotting for alpha subunits of the G(q) protein were also performed using membrane preparations of isolated nasal mucosae. RESULTS: The histamine-induced increase in intranasal pressure was significantly augmented after repeated antigen challenge, indicating that nasal hyperresponsiveness was achieved. In saturation binding studies, no significant change was observed in the density and antagonist affinity of H(1) receptors in the hyperresponsive animals. On the other hand, the affinity of histamine for high-affinity agonist binding sites in the hyperresponsive group, measured by histamine competition binding studies, was much greater than that in control animals, and these results were affected by guanosine 5'-O-(3-thiotriphosphate) in both groups. Moreover, Galpha(q) levels in nasal mucosal homogenates were significantly increased after repeated antigen challenge. CONCLUSIONS: Elevated G protein levels in nasal mucosa might induce an increased binding affinity of histamine to its receptors, resulting in an augmented nasal response to histamine, that is, nasal hyperresponsiveness, in guinea pigs.     

Effect of Y-20811, a long-lasting thromboxane A2 synthetase inhibitor, on antigen-induced airway hyperresponsiveness in guinea pigs.

Effect of Y-20811 on airway hyperresponsiveness was studied in sensitized guinea pigs. Airway hyperresponsiveness to acetylcholine (ACh) reached maximum 7 h after antigen challenge in guinea pigs sensitized actively. Y-20811 (0.3-3 mg/kg) administered orally 3 h prior to challenge inhibited this airway hyperresponsiveness in a dose-dependent manner. Y-20811 (3 mg/kg) administered orally 4 h after antigen challenge also decreased the airway hyperresponsiveness. On the other hand, Y-20811 did not affect the bronchoconstriction induced by ACh, serotonin and histamine in nonsensitized guinea pigs. The number of eosinophils in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid in the guinea pig reached the peak 7 h after antigen challenge. Y-20811 had a tendency to decrease the number of total cells, macrophages and eosinophils in a dose-dependent manner. These results suggest that Y-20811 suppress the asthmatic mechanism which causes antigen-induced airway hyperresponsiveness.     

Effects of fexofenadine on the early response to nasal allergen challenge.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies using nasal allergen challenge models have shown that terfenadine, an H1 antihistamine, inhibits histamine release during the early response to allergen provocation. Fexofenadine, the active metabolite of terfenadine, has strong H1-antihistaminic activity and no cardiac effects. Clinical studies have documented the efficacy of fexofenadine in the treatment of allergic rhinitis. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether fexofenadine, like terfenadine, inhibits histamine and tryptase release during the early allergic response. METHODS: Randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled, two-way crossover study in 20 subjects with seasonal allergic rhinitis, out of their allergy season (median age 27.5 years, 13 males and 7 females). Subjects were medicated with either placebo or fexofenadine 180 mg orally daily for 1 week followed by nasal challenge with allergen. After each challenge, sneezes and nasal symptoms were recorded, and a nasal lavage was obtained for the assay of albumin, an indicator of vascular permeability, and histamine and tryptase, indicators of mast cell degranulation. RESULTS: When patients were on placebo, allergen challenges led to significant increases in all measured parameters compared with the sham challenges with diluent. Treatment with fexofenadine resulted in inhibition of allergen-induced symptoms and increased vascular permeability, but not the release of histamine and tryptase. CONCLUSION: Fexofenadine is an effective H1 antihistamine, but in contrast to its parent compound, terfenadine, it does not affect the release of the mast cell mediators histamine and tryptase.     

Effect of capsaicin as a neuropeptide-releasing substance on sneezing reflex in a type I allergic animal model.

To elucidate the effect of capsaicin-sensitive nerve fibers, which are known to contain substance P (SP) and other sensory neuropeptides, on the sneezing reflex, we have investigated the effect of capsaicin on this reflex provoked in guinea pigs passively sensitized with anaphylactic antibody followed by specific antigen challenge. It has already been established that histamine released from mast cells is a reliable inducer of the sneezing reflex in type I allergy. Our experimental results indicated that the frequency of sneezing provoked by antigen challenge as well as histamine application was significantly reduced by pretreatment with capsaicin in a dose-dependent fashion. SP is considered to be one of the main neurotransmitters in sensory nerves. When the amount of SP in animal nasal mucosa was measured 12 h after capsaicin treatment, a marked reduction was noted. However, the histamine content in the nasal mucosa was not changed by capsaicin treatment. These data suggest that neuropeptides, especially SP, which are released or depleted from sensory nerves by capsaicin treatment, probably play an important role as neurotransmitters of the stimulant histamine in the development of sneezing in type I allergy.     

In vivo and in vitro effects of antihistamines on mast cell mediator release: a potentially important property in the treatment of allergic disease

A nasal antigen challenge model of allergic individuals was used to evaluate whether antihistamines could inhibit human mast cell and basophil mediator release in vivo. In placebo-controlled trials, topically applied azatadine base, a tricyclic antihistamine with in vitro antirelease action, effectively reduced symptoms and mediator levels in nasal lavage fluids after antigen challenge, suggesting mast cell inhibition. Both terfenadine and cetirizine, systemically administered antihistamines, were clinically effective in reducing sneezing and changes in vascular permeability. Only terfenadine significantly reduced histamine in antigen-induced nasal secretions. However, cetirizine did reduce the level of leukotriene C4 in these fluids. These results indicate that some antihistamines may be capable of suppressing mediator release from nasal mast cells. The significance of this property in those compounds' overall clinical effect is unclear because of their other concomitant activities.     

Delayed-type asthmatic response induced by repeated intratracheal exposure to toluene-2,4-diisocyanate in guinea pigs

BACKGROUND: A toluene-2,4-diisocyanate (TDI)-induced asthma model, in which delayed-type hypersensitivity-like asthmatic airway obstruction is elicited restrictively in the lung, has never been developed. METHODS: Guinea pigs were percutaneously sensitized with TDI. For the challenges, once every 2 weeks for a total of 5 times, TDI mists were delivered directly to the lung through an oral cannula, with its tip being positioned in the opening of the trachea. Time-course changes in specific airway resistance (sRaw) were measured by double-flow plethysmography. Basic mechanisms underlying TDI-induced asthma were analyzed. RESULTS: After the 2nd-5th challenges, induction of both an early increase in sRaw that peaked at 10 min and a delayed-type sRaw elevation that peaked at 22 h were observed. Interestingly, in the sensitized/challenged animals, baseline sRaw was elevated by repeated challenge as compared to that seen for non-sensitized animals. Intratracheal administration of a bronchodilator, salbutamol, strongly suppressed the early asthmatic response (EAR) but not the delayed-type asthmatic response (DAR). During DAR, both albumin leakage and fucose secretion into the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid were increased. The cysteinyl leukotriene antagonist pranlukast failed to inhibit either EAR or DAR while the corticosteroid dexamethasone significantly suppressed DAR, without significantly affecting EAR. CONCLUSIONS: Effective delivery of TDI to the lung may induce reproducible DAR in sensitized guinea pigs with chronicity that is reflected by an increase in the sRaw baseline. DAR is not mediated by constriction of airway smooth muscles and is probably due to the concurrent presence of mucosal edema and mucus hypersecretion in the airways.     

The influence of terfenadine and ipratropium bromide alone and in combination on bradykinin-induced nasal symptoms and plasma protein leakage

Nasal instillation of bradykinin elicits many of the characteristic features of rhinitis. To assess the relevance of histamine release from metachromatic cells and the activation of cholinergic pathways, we investigated the effects of terfenadine, a histamine H1-receptor antagonist, and ipratroprium bromide, a selective antimuscarinic agent, on bradykinin induced rhinorrhoea, nasal airways resistance (NAR), nasal pain and plasma protein leakage. Oral terfenadine (120 mg) or matched placebo and nasal ipratropium bromide (80 micrograms) or matched placebo were administered at 4 hr and 30 min respectively prior to bradykinin nasal challenge in two randomized, double-blind and cross-over studies on eight non-rhinitic subjects. Thus subjects received either double-placebo, oral terfenadine and nasal placebo, oral placebo and nasal ipratopium bromide or oral terfenadine and nasal ipratropium bromide, as pretreatment. Bradykinin challenge induced mean maximal increases of 57%, 59%, 77% and 72% in NAR on the placebo, terfenadine, ipratropium bromide and terfenadine plus ipratropium bromide pretreatment days respectively. These increments were not significantly different. Similarly rhinorrhoea and nasal pain induced by bradykinin nasal challenge were not significantly different on the four challenge days. Bradykinin nasal challenge caused a mean maximal increase in albumin levels in recovered nasal lavages of 11.5, 13.0, 12.2 and 12.3 times of baseline levels on the placebo, terfenadine, ipratropium bromide and terfenadine plus ipratroprium bromide pretreatment days respectively. Similarly total protein levels achieved a mean maximal increase of 8.0, 8.2, 7.9 and 8.8 times of baseline levels on these challenge days. The increments in both albumin and total protein did not significantly differ on the 4 challenge days.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Terfenadine with or without phenylpropanolamine in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis

The efficacy of terfenadine in combination with phenylpropanolamine was assessed by comparison with terfenadine alone in a double-blind, parallel group study or 66 patients with nasal birch pollen allergy. The patients were allocated randomly into two groups; 34 patients received terfenadine (60 mg) twice daily and 32 patients a combination tablet containing terfenadine (60 mg) and phenylpropanolamine (50 mg) twice daily for 17 days during the birch pollen season. Nasal symptoms (sneezing, discharge, itching and blockage) were relieved significantly by both drugs, but control of symptoms was more rapid and better with the terfenadine-phenylpropanolamine combination. Rhinoscopic evaluation of nasal secretion and mucosal swelling showed no differences between the treatment groups. Compared with pre-season values, nasal peak expiratory flow (PEF)-values worsened significantly during the season in the terfenadine, but not in the terfenadine-phenylpropanolamine, group. The general condition of the patients was significantly better in the terfenadine-phenylpropanolamine group. There were no marked side-effects in either group. At the end of the trial some of the patients in both treatment groups still had symptoms; this is apparently due to the long-lasting and severe pollen season. It is concluded that terfenadine combined with phenylpropanolamine gives better control of seasonal allergic rhinitis than terfenadine alone.     

Antiallergic effects of terfenadine on immediate type hypersensitivity reactions

Terfenadine dose-dependently inhibited rat homologous PCA (2.5-10 mg/kg, p.o.) and experimentally-induced asthma in guinea pigs (0.5-5 mg/kg, p.o.). Similarly, metabolites I and II dose-dependently inhibited experimentally-induced asthma but their respective potencies were approximately 1/2 and 1/15th that of terfenadine. These results suggest that the metabolites contribute to the antiallergic effects of terfenadine. In ex vivo, terfenadine (5-20 mg/kg, p.o.) also inhibited the release of both antigen-induced histamine and SRS-A from sensitized guinea pig lung samples and that of histamine from rat peritoneal mast cells. Terfenadine dose-dependently increased the cAMP content in rat mast cells and in the lungs; in the latter, the augmented cAMP is associated with an increase in adenylate cyclase activity, but not with the inhibition of phosphodiesterase activity. The above evidence indicates that the inhibitory effects of terfenadine on mediator release from mast cells are in some way related to its antiallergic effects, and that an elevated cAMP content may be effective to enhance mediator release inhibition.     

Antiallergic Effects of Terfenadine on Immediate Type Hypersensitivity Reactions

Terfenadine dose-dependently inhibited rat homologous PCA (2.5-10 mg/ kg, p.o.) and experimentally-induced asthma in guinea pigs (0.5-5 mg/kg, p.o.). Similarly, metabolites I and II dose-dependently inhibited experimentally-induced asthma but their respective potencies were approximately 1/2 and 1/15th that of terfenadine. These results suggest that the metabolites contribute to the antiallergic effects of terfenadine. In ex vivo, terfenadine (5-20 mg/kg, p.o.) also inhibited the release of both antigen-induced histamine and SRS-A from sensitized guinea pig lung samples and that of histamine from rat peritoneal mast cells. Terfenadine dose-dependently increased the cAMP content in rat mast cells and in the lungs; in the latter, the augmented cAMP is associated with an increase in adenylate cyclase activity, but not with the inhibition of phosphodiesterase activity.

The above evidence indicates that the inhibitory effects of terfenadine on mediator release from mast cells are in some way related to its antiallergic effects, and that an elevated cAMP content may be effective to enhance mediator release inhibition.     

Nasal histamine release following hyperosmolar and allergen challenge

Allergic rhinitis is characterised by symptoms of sneezing, itching of the nose with watery secretions, and nasal obstruction. We have previously shown that patients can have the diagnosis of allergic rhinitis confirmed by nasal provocation tests and assessment of nasal inspiratory peak flow (NIPF) after specific allergen or hyperosmolar challenge. We now show that histamine is released into the nasal lavage fluid in response to such challenges. Saline lavage alone results in detectable histamine levels in the order of 5 ng/ml, but in the presence of allergen (HDM) there is a significant increase in histamine release in atopics but not in control subjects. With hyperosmolar challenge, atopics showed a biphasic response in that histamine release was increased with 1.8% and 3.6% saline but returned to baseline with 5.4% and 7.2% saline, then showing a further increase with 9.0% saline. This raises the possibility of two populations of responsive mast cells. Hyperosmolar challenge leads to symptoms of nasal itch and sneezing as well as histamine release in atopics but not in controls. This suggests that hyperosmolar challenge can be used as a simple diagnostic test for allergic rhinitis and may provide a model for nasal hyper-reactivity.     

Nasal sensory nerve populations responding to histamine and capsaicin

BACKGROUND: Inflammation of the nasal mucosa leads to sneezing, nasal itch, rhinorrhea, and nasal blockage. Many of these symptoms are likely the result of nasal trigeminal sensory nerve stimulation by inflammatory mediators. Nasal challenge with the C-fiber stimulant capsaicin causes a different set of symptoms than those evoked by histamine, suggesting that these 2 stimuli may activate separate subpopulations of nasal sensory nerves. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the trigeminal sensory nerves innervating the guinea pig nasal mucosa and to address specifically the hypothesis that histamine and capsaicin activate distinct subgroups of these nerves. METHODS: Guinea pig trigeminal neurons (retrogradely labeled from the nasal mucosa) were assessed for their responses to histamine and capsaicin by studying changes in the intracellular free calcium concentration, and assessed for substance P immunoreactivity. RESULTS: Only 60% of the nasal-specific trigeminal sensory neurons were found to be capsaicin-sensitive. Histamine stimulated only a subset (<40%) of these capsaicin-sensitive neurons. No nasal-specific capsaicin-insensitive neurons responded to histamine, although about 10% of trigeminal ganglion neurons per se responded to histamine but not capsaicin. Immunohistochemical analysis revealed that most (about 60%) of the sensory neurons innervating the nasal mucosa did not express the neuropeptide substance P, including nearly all large-diameter neurons, but also a significant number of small-diameter neurons (presumably C-fiber neurons). CONCLUSION: Nasal neurons are not homogenous with respect to chemosensitivity or substance P content. It is likely that this heterogeneity in nasal afferent nerves underlies the differences in nasal responses to specific inflammatory mediators associated with the allergic reaction.     

Antiallergic Effects of Terfenadine on Immediate Type Hypersensitivity Reactions

Abstract

Terfenadine dose-dependently inhibited rat homologous PCA (2.5-10 mg/ kg, p.o.) and experimentally-induced asthma in guinea pigs (0.5-5 mg/kg, p.o.). Similarly, metabolites I and II dose-dependently inhibited experimentally-induced asthma but their respective potencies were approximately 1/2 and 1/15th that of terfenadine. These results suggest that the metabolites contribute to the antiallergic effects of terfenadine. In ex vivo, terfenadine (5-20 mg/kg, p.o.) also inhibited the release of both antigen-induced histamine and SRS-A from sensitized guinea pig lung samples and that of histamine from rat peritoneal mast cells. Terfenadine dose-dependently increased the cAMP content in rat mast cells and in the lungs; in the latter, the augmented cAMP is associated with an increase in adenylate cyclase activity, but not with the inhibition of phosphodiesterase activity.

The above evidence indicates that the inhibitory effects of terfenadine on mediator release from mast cells are in some way related to its antiallergic effects, and that an elevated cAMP content may be effective to enhance mediator release inhibition.     

Neural hyperresponsiveness and nerve growth factor in allergic rhinitis

BACKGROUND: In allergic rhinitis, symptoms are triggered not only by allergens but also by environmental irritants. Hereinafter we address the hypothesis that this is reflective of increased responsiveness of the neural apparatus which, in turn, may be attributable to upregulation of nerve growth factor (NGF) in this disease. METHODS: We compared subjects with active allergic rhinitis and healthy volunteers in terms of sensitivity and/or magnitude of three nerve-mediated responses, namely (1) the sneezing reflex induced by histamine, (2) the central or nasonasal reflex depicted by contralateral secretions induced by unilateral nasal challenge with capsaicin, and (3) the axonal reflex depicted by plasma extravasation upon capsaicin challenge. We have also measured NGF levels in nasal lavage fluids at baseline and with allergen provocation in rhinitis and healthy subjects. RESULTS: Compared to healthy individuals, subjects with active allergic rhinitis were found to have (1) significantly greater sensitivity and reactivity of the sneezing reflex, (2) significantly greater secretory responsiveness to sensory nerve stimulation, and (3) significantly greater plasma extravasation indicated by albumin leakage following capsaicin nasal challenge. We also found that subjects with active allergic rhinitis have significantly greater baseline levels of NGF in nasal lavage fluids compared to their healthy counterparts, and that these levels can be increased by allergen nasal provocation. CONCLUSION: The responsiveness of the neural apparatus of the nose is significantly greater in patients with active allergic rhinitis. The increased presence of NGF in the nasal mucosa of these patients supports the hypothesis that this neurotrophin may be implicated in neural hyperresponsiveness.     

Effects of leukotriene B4 receptor antagonist, LY293111Na, on antigen-induced bronchial hyperresponsiveness and leukocyte infiltration in sensitized guinea pigs

OBJECTIVE AND DESIGN: LY29311 Na, 2-[2-propyl-3-[3-[2-ethyl-4-(4-fluorophenyl)-5-hydroxyphenoxy] propoxy] -phenoxy]-benzoic acid sodium salt, is a novel leukotriene B4 (LTB4) receptor antagonist. Its effects on guinea pig models of asthma were compared with those of dexamethasone. METHODS: Effects of LY293111Na were tested in antigen (ovalbumin, OA)-induced bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) and leukocyte accumulation in actively sensitized guinea pigs. Its effects on antigen-induced acute bronchoconstriction in passively sensitized guinea pigs were also studied. RESULTS: LY293111 Na (10 to 30 mg/kg p.o., 1 h before and 6 h after OA challenge) inhibited BHR to acetylcholine. LY293111 Na (3 mg/kg p. o.) significantly inhibited accumulation of neutrophils in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid 24 h after antigen challenge but it did not inhibit accumulation of eosinophils and macrophages at any doses used. In contrast, dexamethasone (30 mg/kg p.o., 4 h before OA challenge) not only inhibited BHR but also reduced the infiltration of all three types of leukocytes. A significant increase of LTB4 levels in BAL fluid was noted at 3 and 15 min after the antigen challenge. LY293111Na did not inhibit antigen-induced acute bronchoconstriction in passively sensitized guinea pigs. CONCLUSION: These results indicate that LTB4 may participate in antigen-induced BHR but not in eosinophil infiltration and acute bronchoconstriction in guinea pigs.     

Antiallergic activity of loratadine, a non-sedating antihistamine

Loratadine is a new non-sedating antihistamine. The present studies compared loratadine and terfenadine, another non-sedating antihistamine, for their ability to inhibit the bronchial response to histamine and other autacoids which have been implicated as contributing to the symptoms of an allergic reaction. In addition, the two antihistamines were evaluated in models of immunologically mediated allergic reactions. Loratadine is a more potent inhibitor of histamine-induced bronchospasm in guinea pigs than is terfenadine. Both antihistamines exhibit marked antiserotonin activity at doses 10 times their antihistamine ED50 values. In contrast, loratadine and terfenadine produce little or no inhibition of the bronchial responses to methacholine, leukotriene C4 or platelet-activating factor. An allergic bronchospasm in guinea pigs is inhibited by loratadine (ED50 = 0.40 mg/kg, p.o.) and terfenadine (ED50 = 1.7 mg/kg, p.o.). The bronchospasm associated with allergic anaphylaxis in rats is significantly inhibited by 10 mg/kg, p.o. loratadine and 30 mg/kg, p.o. terfenadine. Loratadine exhibits antiallergy activity in vitro. At micromolar concentrations, loratadine inhibits the release of histamine from Con A and A23187-stimulated rat peritoneal mast cells and the release of histamine and leukotriene C4 from a Con A-stimulated cloned murine mast cell line.