Pioglitazone: a review of its use in type 2 diabetes mellitus

Pioglitazone is an antihyperglycaemic agent that, in the presence of insulin resistance, increases hepatic and peripheral insulin sensitivity, thereby inhibiting hepatic gluconeogenesis and increasing peripheral and splanchnic glucose uptake. Pioglitazone is generally well tolerated, weight gain and oedema are the most common emergent adverse events, and there are no known drug interactions between pioglitazone and other drugs. In clinical trials in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, pioglitazone as monotherapy, or in combination with metformin, repaglinide, insulin or a sulphonylurea, induced both long- and short-term improvements in glycaemic control and serum lipid profiles. Pioglitazone was also effective in reducing some measures of cardiovascular risk and arteriosclerosis. Pioglitazone thus offers an effective treatment option for the management of patients with type 2 diabetes.     

New approaches to treating type 2 diabetes mellitus in the elderly: role of incretin therapies

The increasing proportion of elderly persons in the global population, and the implications of this trend in terms of increasing rates of chronic diseases such as type 2 diabetes mellitus, continue to be a cause for concern for clinicians and healthcare policy makers. The diagnosis and treatment of type 2 diabetes in the elderly is challenging, as age-related changes alter the clinical presentation of diabetic symptoms. Once type 2 diabetes is diagnosed, the principles of its management are similar to those in younger patients, but with special considerations linked to the increased prevalence of co-morbidities and relative inability to tolerate the adverse effects of medication and hypoglycaemia. In addition, there are many underappreciated factors complicating diabetes care in the elderly, including cognitive disorders, physical disability and geriatric syndromes, such as frailty, urinary incontinence and pain. Available oral antihyperglycaemic drugs include insulin secretagogues (meglitinides and sulfonylureas), biguanides (metformin), alpha-glucosidase inhibitors and thiazolidinediones. Unfortunately, as type 2 diabetes progresses in older persons, polypharmacy intensification is required to achieve adequate glycaemic control with the attendant increased risk of adverse effects as a result of age-related changes in drug metabolism. The recent introduction of the incretins, a group of intestinal peptides that enhance insulin secretion after ingestion of food, as novel oral antihyperglycaemic treatments may prove significant in older persons. The two main categories of incretin therapy currently available are: glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) analogues and inhibitors of GLP-1 degrading enzyme dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4). The present review discusses the effect of aging on metabolic control in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes, the current treatments used to treat this population and some of the more recent advances in the field of geriatric type 2 diabetes. In particular, we highlight the efficacy and safety of GLP-1 and DPP-4 inhibitors, administered as monotherapy or in combination with other oral antihyperglycaemic agents, especially when the relevant clinical trials included older persons. There is strong evidence that use of incretin therapy, in particular, the DPP-4 inhibitors, could offer significant advantages in older persons. Clinical evidence suggests that the DPP-4 inhibitors vildagliptin and sitagliptin are particularly suitable for frail and debilitated elderly patients because of their excellent tolerability profiles. Importantly, these agents lack the gastrointestinal effects seen with metformin and alpha-glucosidase inhibitors taken alone, and have a low risk of the hypoglycaemic events commonly seen with agents that directly lower blood glucose levels.     

Ameliorating Effects of Sulfonylurea Drugs on Insulin Resistance in Otsuka Long-Evans Tokushima Fatty Rats

OLETF (Otsuka Long-Evans Tokushima Fatty) rats are characterized by obesity-related insulin resistance, which is a phenotype of type 2 diabetes. Sulfonylurea drugs or benzoic acid derivatives as inhibitors of the ATP-sensitive potassium (K_ATP) channel are commercially available to treat diabetes. The present study compared sulfonylurea drugs (glimepiride and gliclazide) with one of benzoic acid derivatives (repaglinide) in regard to their long-term effect on ameliorating insulin sensitivity in OLETF rats. Each drug was dissolved and fed with drinking water from 29 weeks of age. On high glucose loading at 45 weeks of age, response of blood glucose recovery was the greatest in the group treated with glimepiride. On immunohistochemistry analysis for the Kir6.2 subunit of K_ATP channels, insulin receptor β-subunits, and glucose transporters (GLUT) type 2 and 4 in liver, fat and skeletal muscle tissues, the sulfonylurea drugs (glimepiride and gliclazide) were more effective than repaglinide in recovery from their decreased expressions in OLETF rats. From these results, it seems to be plausible that K_ATP-channel inhibitors containing sulfonylurea moiety may be much more effective in reducing insulin resistance than those with benzoic acid moiety. In contrast to gliclazide, non-tissue selectivity of glimepiride on K_ATP channel inhibition may further strengthen an amelioration of insulin sensitivity unless considering other side effects.     

Clinical review of glimepiride

This article reviews the pharmacological and clinical aspects of glimepiride, the latest second-generation sulfonylurea for treatment of Type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM). Glimepiride therapy ameliorates the relative insulin secretory deficit found in most patients with Type 2 DM. It is a direct insulin secretagogue; indirectly, it also increases insulin secretion in response to fuels such as glucose. Its action to augment insulin secretion requires binding to a high affinity sulfonylurea receptor, which results in closure of ATP-sensitive potassium channels in the β-cells of the pancreas. The question has been raised whether insulin secretagogues by acting on vascular or myocardial potassium channels may prevent ischaemic preconditioning, a physiological adaptation that could affect the outcome of coronary heart disease, but there is evidence against this concern being applicable to glimepiride. Glimepiride’s antihyperglycaemic efficacy is equal to other secretagogues. It has pharmacokinetic properties that make it less prone to cause hypoglycaemia in renal dysfunction than some other insulin secretagogues, particularly glyburide (also known as glibenclamide in Europe). Its convenient once daily dosing may enhance compliance for diabetic patients who often also require medications for other co-morbid conditions, such as hypertension, hyperlipidaemia and cardiac disease. Glimepiride is approved for monotherapy, for combination with metformin and with insulin. Clinically, its reduced risk of hypoglycaemia makes it preferable to some other insulin secretagogues when attempting to achieve recommended glycaemic control (haemoglobin A_1c (HgbA_1c) 7%). Using suppertime neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) and regular insulin with morning glimepiride in overweight diabetic patients achieves glycaemic goals more quickly than insulin alone and with lower insulin doses.     

Clinical review of glimepiride

This article reviews the pharmacological and clinical aspects of glimepiride, the latest second-generation sulfonylurea for treatment of Type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM). Glimepiride therapy ameliorates the relative insulin secretory deficit found in most patients with Type 2 DM. It is a direct insulin secretagogue; indirectly, it also increases insulin secretion in response to fuels such as glucose. Its action to augment insulin secretion requires binding to a high affinity sulfonylurea receptor, which results in closure of ATP-sensitive potassium channels in the beta-cells of the pancreas. The question has been raised whether insulin secretagogues by acting on vascular or myocardial potassium channels may prevent ischaemic preconditioning, a physiological adaptation that could affect the outcome of coronary heart disease, but there is evidence against this concern being applicable to glimepiride. Glimepiride's antihyperglycaemic efficacy is equal to other secretagogues. It has pharmacokinetic properties that make it less prone to cause hypoglycaemia in renal dysfunction than some other insulin secretagogues, particularly glyburide (also known as glibenclamide in Europe). Its convenient once daily dosing may enhance compliance for diabetic patients who often also require medications for other co-morbid conditions, such as hypertension, hyperlipidaemia and cardiac disease. Glimepiride is approved for monotherapy, for combination with metformin and with insulin. Clinically, its reduced risk of hypoglycaemia makes it preferable to some other insulin secretagogues when attempting to achieve recommended glycaemic control (haemoglobin A(1c) (HgbA(1c)) 7%). Using suppertime neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) and regular insulin with morning glimepiride in overweight diabetic patients achieves glycaemic goals more quickly than insulin alone and with lower insulin doses.     

Exenatide extended-release: a review of its use in type 2 diabetes mellitus

Subcutaneous exenatide extended-release (ER; Bydureon?; also known as exenatide once weekly), a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, provides a convenient, simple, once-weekly regimen that is approved in adult patients with type 2 diabetes as adjunctive monotherapy to diet plus exercise (in the US; not as first-line therapy) and/or as combination therapy with specific oral antihyperglycaemic drugs (OADs) in patients with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes despite treatment with these OADs (US and Europe). This article reviews the clinical efficacy and tolerability of exenatide ER in the treatment of adult patients with type 2 diabetes and gives a brief overview of its pharmacological properties. In several short-term (24-30 weeks) well designed trials, adjunctive subcutaneously injectable exenatide ER once weekly, as monotherapy or in combination with OADs, significantly improved glycaemic control, bodyweight and some surrogate markers of cardiovascular risk in adult patients with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes despite diet and exercise and/or treatment with OADs. Furthermore, the beneficial effects of adjunctive exenatide ER therapy were sustained in extension studies of up to 3 years of treatment. Overall, the intensity of glycaemic control with exenatide ER was generally better than that observed with the exenatide immediate-release formulation (twice daily), sitagliptin or insulin glargine. Exenatide ER was shown to be noninferior to metformin in terms of glycaemic efficacy, but did not meet the criteria for noninferiority versus liraglutide. In treatment-naive patients, exenatide ER treatment did not meet noninferiority criteria versus pioglitazone, whereas in treatment-experienced patients, exenatide ER provided better glycaemic control than pioglitazone. Improvements in glycaemic control with exenatide ER and, in general, with other antihyperglycaemic agents were reflected in significant improvements from baseline in treatment satisfaction and health-related quality-of-life measures. Exenatide ER was generally well tolerated in patients participating in these trials, with most treatment-emergent adverse events being of a gastrointestinal nature, of mild to moderate severity, transient and of a similar nature and incidence to those occurring with the exenatide immediate-release formulation. Thus, exenatide ER is a useful option for the treatment of type 2 diabetes, particularly in patients where bodyweight loss is an essential aspect of the individual patient's management.     

Meglitinide analogues in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus

Type 2 diabetes mellitus is a complex heterogenous metabolic disorder in which peripheral insulin resistance and impaired insulin release are the main pathogenetic factors. The rapid response of the pancreatic beta-cells to glucose is already markedly disturbed in the early stages of type 2 diabetes mellitus. The consequence is often postprandial hyperglycaemia, which seems to be extremely important in the development of secondary complications, especially macrovascular disease. Therefore one of the main aims of treatment is to minimise blood glucose oscillations and attain near-normal glycosylated haemoglobin levels. Meglitinide analogues belong to a new family of insulin secretagogues which stimulate insulin release by inhibiting ATP-sensitive potassium channels of the beta-cell membrane via binding to a receptor distinct from that of sulphonylureas (SUR1/KIR 6.2). The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of repaglinide, the first drug of these new antihyperglycaemic agents on the market, and of nateglinide, which will be available soon, differ markedly from the currently used sulphonylureas [mainly glibenclamide (glyburide) and glimepiride]. Repaglinide and nateglinide are absorbed rapidly, stimulate insulin release within a few minutes, are rapidly metabolised in the liver and are mainly excreted in the bile. Therefore, following preprandial administration of these drugs, insulin is more readily available during and just after the meal. This leads to a significant reduction in postprandial hyperglycaemia without the danger of hypoglycaemia between meals. The short action of these compounds and biliary elimination makes repaglinide and nateglinide especially suitable for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who would like to have a more flexible lifestyle, need more flexibility because of unplanned eating behaviour (e.g. geriatric patients) or in whom one of the other first-line antidiabetic drugs, i.e. metformin, is strictly contraindicated (e.g. nephropathy with creatinine clearance < or = 50 ml/min). Meglitinide analogues act synergistically with metformin and thiazolidinediones (pioglitazone and rosiglitazone) and can be also combined with long-acting insulin (NPH insulin at bedtime). Therefore, these drugs enrich the palette of antidiabetic drugs and make the treatment more flexible and better tolerated, which both add to better metabolic control and support the empowerment and compliance of the patient. However, this will only be the case if the patient and the diabetes care team are trained for this new therapeutic schedule and the healthcare system is able to pay for these rather expensive drugs.     

Inhaled human insulin (Exubera): a review of its use in adult patients with diabetes mellitus

Inhaled human insulin (Exubera) (insulin human [rDNA origin]) Inhalation Powder) has recently been approved in the European Union and the US for preprandial use in adult patients with diabetes mellitus. This formulation of insulin has a more rapid onset, but similar duration, of glucose-lowering activity compared with subcutaneously administered regular human insulin.Preprandial inhaled human insulin provided glycaemic control that was comparable to preprandial subcutaneous regular insulin when added to long- or intermediate-acting subcutaneous basal insulin in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus. Inhaled human insulin is also effective when administered alone, when combined with oral antihyperglycaemic therapy, or when combined with basal subcutaneous insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Comparable rates of hypoglycaemia occurred in patients treated with inhaled human insulin and in those treated with subcutaneous regular human insulin. Patients treated with inhaled human insulin demonstrated a greater decline in pulmonary function (forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV(1)], carbon monoxide diffusing capacity [DL(CO)]) than patients treated with comparator antihyperglycaemic agents; the mean difference between the treatment groups that favoured the comparators was noted within the first several weeks of treatment, and did not change over a 2-year treatment period. This agent has also been associated with significant improvements in some quality-of-life and treatment satisfaction scores, especially when compared with subcutaneous mealtime insulin regimens. Inhaled human insulin is an effective and well tolerated formulation suitable for preprandial use in combination with basal subcutaneous insulin in patients with type 1 diabetes. It is also well tolerated and effective in patients with type 2 diabetes when administered alone, when combined with oral antihyperglycaemic therapy, or when combined with basal subcutaneous insulin.     

Linagliptin: in type 2 diabetes mellitus

Linagliptin, a novel dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor, has a favourable pharmacokinetic profile in terms of its predominantly non-renal elimination. It shows highly selective, potent, dose-dependent inhibition of DPP-4, with ≥ 80% inhibition of DPP-4 throughout the 24-hour dosing interval. In two double-blind, multicentre trials (n?>350 evaluable patients/trial) in adult patients with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus, oral linagliptin monotherapy (5 or 10?mg once daily) was significantly more effective than placebo in improving glycaemic control and several parameters of pancreatic function, with placebo-corrected adjusted mean changes in glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA(1c)) levels of -0.69% to -0.88% after 12 or 24 weeks. Linagliptin 5 or 10?mg once daily was also significantly more efficacious than voglibose 0.2?mg three times daily in terms of improving glycaemic control in a 26-week, double-blind, multicentre trial (n?>450 evaluable patients). In several similarly designed trials (n?>250 evaluable patients/trial) of 12-24 weeks' duration in adult patients with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes, oral linagliptin (5?mg once daily) as add-on therapy to metformin, a sulfonylurea drug or metformin plus a sulfonylurea drug, or in combination with pioglitazone, improved glycaemic control significantly more than placebo plus the respective oral antihyperglycaemic therapy, with improvements in adjusted mean HbA(1c) levels considered clinically relevant. Linagliptin, as monotherapy or in combination with other oral antihyperglycaemic drugs, was generally well tolerated in clinical trials, having neutral or minimal effects on bodyweight and generally being associated with a very low incidence of hypoglycaemia.     

Repaglinide: a review of its therapeutic use in type 2 diabetes mellitus

Repaglinide, a carbamoylmethyl benzoic acid derivative, is the first of a new class of oral antidiabetic agents designed to normalise postprandial glucose excursions in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Like the sulphonylureas, repaglinide reduces blood glucose by stimulating insulin release from pancreatic beta-cells, but differs from these and other antidiabetic agents in its structure, binding profile, duration of action and mode of excretion. In clinical trials of up to 1-year's duration, repaglinide maintained or improved glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. In comparative, 1-year, double-blind, randomised trials (n = 256 to 544), patients receiving repaglinide (0.5 to 4mg before 3 daily meals) achieved similar glycaemic control to that in patients receiving glibenclamide (glyburide) < or = 15 mg/day and greater control than patients receiving glipizide < or = 15 mg/day. Changes from baseline in glycosylated haemoglobin and fasting blood glucose levels were similar between patients receiving repaglinide and glibenclamide in all studies; however, repaglinide was slightly better than glibenclamide in reducing postprandial blood glucose in I short term study (n = 192). Patients can vary their meal timetable with repaglinide: the glucose-lowering efficacy of repaglinide was similar for patients consuming 2, 3 or 4 meals a day. Repaglinide showed additive effects when used in combination with other oral antidiabetic agents including metformin, troglitazone, rosiglitazone and pioglitazone, and intermediate-acting insulin (NPH) given at bedtime. In 1-year trials, the most common adverse events reported in repaglinide recipients (n = 1,228) were hypoglycaemia (16%), upper respiratory tract infection (10%), rhinitis (7%), bronchitis (6%) and headache (9%). The overall incidence of hypoglycaemia was similar to that recorded in patients receiving glibenclamide, glipizide or gliclazide (n = 597) [18%]; however, the incidence of serious hypoglycaemia appears to be slightly higher in sulphonylurea recipients. Unlike glibenclamide, the risk of hypoglycaemia in patients receiving repaglinide was not increased when a meal was missed in 1 trial. In conclusion, repaglinide is a useful addition to the other currently available treatments for type 2 diabetes mellitus. Preprandial repaglinide has displayed antihyperglycaemic efficacy at least equal to that of various sulphonylureas and is associated with a reduced risk of serious hypoglycaemia. It is well tolerated in a wide range of patients, including the elderly, even if a meal is missed. Furthermore, glycaemic control is improved when repaglinide is used in combination with metformin. Thus, repaglinide should be considered for use in any patient with type 2 diabetes mellitus whose blood glucose cannot be controlled by diet or exercise alone, or as an adjunct in patients whose glucose levels are inadequately controlled on metformin alone.     

Drug-drug and food-drug pharmacokinetic interactions with new insulinotropic agents repaglinide and nateglinide

This review describes the current knowledge on drug-drug and food-drug interactions with repaglinide and nateglinide. These two meglitinide derivatives, commonly called glinides, have been developed for improving insulin secretion of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. They are increasingly used either in monotherapy or in combination with other oral antihyperglycaemic agents for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Compared with sulfonylureas, glinides have been shown to (i) provide a better control of postprandial hyperglycaemia, (ii) overcome some adverse effects, such as hypoglycaemia, and (iii) have a more favourable safety profile, especially in patients with renal failure.The meal-related timing of administration of glinides and the potential influence of food and meal composition on their bioavailability may be important. In addition, some food components (e.g. grapefruit juice) may cause pharmacokinetic interactions. Because glinides are metabolised via cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 isoenzyme, they are indeed exposed to pharmacokinetic interactions. In addition to CYP3A4, repaglinide is metabolised via CYP2C8, while nateglinide metabolism also involves CYP2C9. Furthermore, both compounds and their metabolites may undergo specialised transport/uptake in the intestine, another source of pharmacokinetic interactions. Clinically relevant drug-drug interactions are those that occur when glinides are administered together with other glucose-lowering agents or compounds widely coadministered to diabetic patients (e.g. lipid-lowering agents), with drugs that are known to induce (risk of lower glinide plasma levels and thus of deterioration of glucose control) or inhibit (risk of higher glinide plasma levels leading to hypoglycaemia) CYP isoenzymes concerned in their metabolism, or with drugs that have a narrow efficacy : toxicity ratio.Pharmacokinetic interactions reported in the literature appear to be more frequent and more important with repaglinide than with nateglinide. Rifampicin (rifampin) reduced repaglinide area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) by 32-85% while it reduced nateglinide AUC by almost 25%. Reported increases in AUCs with coadministration of drugs inhibiting CYP isoenzymes never exceeded 80% for repaglinide (except with ciclosporin and with gemfibrozil) and 50% for nateglinide. Ciclosporin more than doubled repaglinide AUC (+144%), a finding that should raise caution when using these two drugs in combination. The most impressive pharmacokinetic interaction was reported with combined administration of gemfibrozil (a strong CYP2C8 inhibitor) and repaglinide (8-fold increase in repaglinide AUC). Although no studies have been performed in patients with type 2 diabetes, the latter combination should be avoided in clinical practice.     

Linagliptin: a review of its use in the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus

Linagliptin (Trajenta?, Tradjenta?, Trazenta?, Trayenta?) is an oral, highly selective inhibitor of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 and is the first agent of its class to be eliminated predominantly via a nonrenal route. Linagliptin is indicated for once-daily use for the treatment of adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus, and a twice-daily fixed-dose combination of linagliptin/metformin (Jentadueto?) is also available. In this article, the pharmacological, clinical efficacy and tolerability data relevant to the use of linagliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes are reviewed. The efficacy of oral linagliptin in the treatment of adults with type 2 diabetes has been investigated in several double-blind, multicentre trials. Following 12-24 weeks of treatment, improvements in glycaemic control parameters, including glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA(1c); primary endpoint in all trials), were seen with linagliptin relative to placebo when used as monotherapy, initial combination therapy (with metformin or pioglitazone) or add-on therapy to other oral antihyperglycaemia agents (metformin and/or a sulfonylurea) or basal insulin (with or without metformin and/or pioglitazone). In terms of lowering HbA(1c), linagliptin was more effective than voglibose in a 26-week monotherapy trial and noninferior to glimepiride when used as add-on therapy to metformin in a 104-week study. Additional trials and subgroup analyses of pooled data suggest that linagliptin improves glycaemic control regardless of factors such as age, duration of type 2 diabetes, ethnicity and renal function, and as linagliptin is eliminated primarily via a nonrenal route, it can be used without dosage adjustment in patients with renal impairment of any degree. Oral linagliptin was generally well tolerated and was associated with a low likelihood of hypoglycaemia (except when used in combination with a sulfonylurea) and had little effect on bodyweight. Further long-term and comparative efficacy and tolerability data are required to help position linagliptin more definitively with respect to other antihyperglycaemia agents. However, clinical data currently available indicate that linagliptin is an effective and generally well tolerated treatment option for use in patients with type 2 diabetes, including those with renal impairment for whom other antihyperglycaemia agents require dosage adjustment or are not suitable.     

Drug interactions of clinical importance with antihyperglycaemic agents: an update.

Because management of type 2 diabetes mellitus usually involves combined pharmacological therapy to obtain adequate glucose control and treatment of concurrent pathologies (especially dyslipidaemia and arterial hypertension), drug-drug interactions must be carefully considered with antihyperglycaemic drugs. Additive glucose-lowering effects have been extensively reported when combining sulphonylureas (or the new insulin secretagogues, meglitinide derivatives, i.e. nateglinide and repaglinide) with metformin, sulphonylureas (or meglitinide derivatives) with thiazolidinediones (also called glitazones) and the biguanide compound metformin with thiazolidinediones. Interest in combining alpha-glucosidase inhibitors with either sulphonylureas (or meglitinide derivatives), metformin or thiazolidinediones has also been demonstrated. These combinations result in lower glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA(1c)), fasting glucose and postprandial glucose levels than with either monotherapy. Even if modest pharmacokinetic interferences have been reported with some combinations, they do not appear to have important clinical consequences. No significant adverse effects, except a higher risk of hypoglycaemic episodes that may be attributed to better glycaemic control, occur with any combination. Challenging the classical dual therapy with sulphonylurea plus metformin, there is a recent trend to use alternative dual combinations (sulphonylurea plus thiazolidinedione or metformin plus thiazolidinedione). In addition, triple therapy with the addition of a thiazolidinedione to the metformin-sulphonylurea combination has been recently evaluated and allows glucose targets to be reached before insulin therapy is considered. This triple therapy appears to be safe, with no deleterious drug-drug interactions being reported so far.Potential interferences may also occur between glucose-lowering agents and other drugs, and such drug-drug interactions may have important clinical implications. Relevant pharmacological agents are those that are widely coadministered in diabetic patients (e.g. lipid-lowering agents, antihypertensive agents); those that have a narrow efficacy/toxicity ratio (e.g. digoxin, warfarin); or those that are known to induce (rifampicin [rifampin]) or inhibit (fluconazole) the cytochrome P450 (CYP) system. Metformin is currently a key compound in the pharmacological management of type 2 diabetes, used either alone or in combination with other antihyperglycaemics. There are no clinically relevant metabolic interactions with metformin, because this compound is not metabolised and does not inhibit the metabolism of other drugs. In contrast, sulphonylureas, meglitinide derivatives and thiazolidinediones are extensively metabolised in the liver via the CYP system and thus, may be subject to drug-drug metabolic interactions. Many HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) are also metabolised via the CYP system. Even if modest pharmacokinetic interactions may occur, it is not clear whether drug-drug interactions between oral antihyperglycaemic agents and statins may have clinical consequences regarding both efficacy and safety. In contrast, a marked pharmacokinetic interference has been reported between gemfibrozil and repaglinide and, to a lesser extent, between gemfibrozil and rosiglitazone. This leads to a drastic increase in plasma concentrations of each antihyperglycaemic agent when they are coadministered with the fibric acid derivative, and an increased risk of adverse effects.Some antihypertensive agents may favour hypoglycaemic episodes when co-prescribed with sulphonylureas or meglitinide derivatives, especially ACE inhibitors, but this effect seems to result from a pharmacodynamic drug-drug interaction rather than from a pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction. No, or only modest, interferences have been described with glucose-lowering agents and other pharmacological compounds such as digoxin or warfarin. The effects of inducers or inhibitors of CYP isoenzymes on the metabolism and pharmacokinetics of the glucose-lowering agents of each pharmacological class has been tested. Significantly increased (with CYP inhibitors) or decreased (with CYP inducers) plasma levels of sulphonylureas, meglitinide derivatives and thiazolidinediones have been reported in healthy volunteers, and these pharmacokinetic changes may lead to enhanced or reduced glucose-lowering action, and thus hypoglycaemia or worsening of metabolic control, respectively. In addition, some case reports have evidenced potential drug-drug interactions with various antihyperglycaemic agents that are usually associated with a higher risk of hypoglycaemia.     

诺和龙联合地特胰岛素治疗2型糖尿病的疗效观察

目的通过研究诺和龙联合地特胰岛素治疗继发性药物失效的2型糖尿病患者的治疗效果,为临床提供一种切实有效的治疗磺脲类药物继发性失效的方法。方法诺和龙每日3次口服,联合地特胰岛素每日睡前皮下注射(地特组,26例),诺和灵30R(诺和灵组,30例),分别于治疗前及治疗8周后检测HbA1C、FBG及2hPBG。结果两组治疗后指标均明显改善,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。地特胰岛素组HbA1C、FBG及2hPBG较治疗前明显改善,与诺和灵组治疗效果相同。结论使用诺和龙联合地特胰岛素对继发性药物失效的2型糖尿病患者非常安全,而且有明显疗效。     

New non-sulfonylurea insulin secretagogues

Current treatments for non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) remain far from ideal. The universal finding of islet dysfunction characterised by the absence of first phase insulin secretion, even prior to the level of hyperglycaemia diagnostic of NIDDM, challenges the rationale for treatments that only enhance insulin action. To date, however, the sulfonylureas are the only insulin secretagogues available and even the most rapid acting of these fail to restore early insulin release in response to meals. Four novel non-sulfonylurea insulin secretagogues are in advanced clinical development: A-4166, KAD-1229, BTS 67 582 and repaglinide. These promising new agents control prandial hyperglycaemia by augmenting the early insulin response to meals. Preclinical and early clinical data suggest that their potencies vary considerably, as do their pharmacokinetics and, importantly, their pharmacodynamics. The two shortest-acting compounds, A-4166 and KAD-1229, will be developed to be taken prior to each main meal, while the slower, longer duration agents, repaglinide and BTS 67 582, may be developed to be taken twice daily. With a sufficiently rapid onset and short duration of action, the new non-sulfonylurea insulin secretagogues may improve or even restore the impairment of early insulin secretion without inducing the prolonged hyperinsulinaemia characteristic of sulfonylureas. Treatment with these new agents will immediately improve prandial glucose control and with continued treatment these agents are expected to improve the overall metabolic state. Furthermore, a short-acting secretagogue will have minimal propensity to elicit prolonged or delayed hypoglycaemia and it is expected that by minimising chronic hyperinsulinaemia the weight gain that accompanies sulfonylurea treatment will be avoided. In summary, the new non-sulfonylurea insulin secretagogues will make an important contribution to the limited and inadequate armamentarium currently available for the treatment of NIDDM, and their use in combination with insulin sensitising agents may provide, for the first time, an approximation to ideal metabolic control in NIDDM.     

The potential role of valsartan + AHU377 (LCZ696) in the treatment of heart failure

Current treatments for non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) remain far from ideal. The universal finding of islet dysfunction characterised by the absence of first phase insulin secretion, even prior to the level of hyperglycaemia diagnostic of NIDDM, challenges the rationale for treatments that only enhance insulin action. To date, however, the sulfonylureas are the only insulin secretagogues available and even the most rapid acting of these fail to restore early insulin release in response to meals. Four novel non-sulfonylurea insulin secretagogues are in advanced clinical development: A-4166, KAD-1229, BTS 67 582 and repaglinide. These promising new agents control prandial hyperglycaemia by augmenting the early insulin response to meals. Preclinical and early clinical data suggest that their potencies vary considerably, as do their pharmacokinetics and, importantly, their pharmacodynamics. The two shortest-acting compounds, A-4166 and KAD-1229, will be developed to be taken prior to each main meal, while the slower, longer duration agents, repaglinide and BTS 67 582, may be developed to be taken twice daily. With a sufficiently rapid onset and short duration of action, the new non-sulfonylurea insulin secretagogues may improve or even restore the impairment of early insulin secretion without inducing the prolonged hyperinsulinaemia characteristic of sulfonylureas. Treatment with these new agents will immediately improve prandial glucose control and with continued treatment these agents are expected to improve the overall metabolic state. Furthermore, a short-acting secretagogue will have minimal propensity to elicit prolonged or delayed hypoglycaemia and it is expected that by minimising chronic hyperinsulinaemia the weight gain that accompanies sulfonylurea treatment will be avoided. In summary, the new non-sulfonylurea insulin secretagogues will make an important contribution to the limited and inadequate armamentarium currently available for the treatment of NIDDM, and their use in combination with insulin sensitising agents may provide, for the first time, an approximation to ideal metabolic control in NIDDM.     

甘精胰岛素联合瑞格列奈治疗初发2型糖尿病的临床观察

目的分析了甘精胰岛素与瑞格列奈联合治疗初发2型糖尿病的疗效。方法徐州市中心医院于2009年至2011年共收治2型糖尿病患者40例,所有患者初诊均为2型糖尿病,40例患者每天皮下给予甘精胰岛素1次,主要控制患者的空腹状态下的血糖浓度,并在患者三餐之前口服瑞格列奈对用餐后的血糖水平进行控制。治疗4个月之后对患者空腹血糖水平、餐后2h的血糖水平、糖化血红蛋白水平以及空腹状态下胰岛素的浓度、C肽和进餐后2h的胰岛素、C肽进行分析。结果与治疗前比较,治疗后患者空腹血糖水平和餐后2h的血糖水平显著性下降,具有统计学意义(P<0.05);治疗前后糖化血红蛋白的水平治疗前相比较,患者治疗之后胰岛素以及C肽浓度均有显著性的改善(P<0.05)。结论甘精胰岛素与瑞格列奈联合治疗2型糖尿病疗效显著可很好的控制患者血糖浓度,对患者β细胞功能恢复意义重大,值得临床推广使用。     

Nateglinide: A structurally novel,short-acting,hypoglycemic agent

Nateglinide is a short-acting, pancreatic, beta-cell-selective, K(ATP) potassium channel blocker that improves overall glycemic control in type 2 diabetes. Although nateglinide's mechanism of action is related to that of sulphonyl-ureas and repaglinide, important differences do exist. Nateglinide binds rapidly to the sulfonylurea SUR1 receptor with a relatively low affinity, and it dissociates from it extremely rapidly in a manner of seconds. This rapid association and dissociation gives nateglinide a unique "fast on-fast off" effect. Thus, nateglinide has a rapid onset and short duration of action stimulating insulin secretion in vivo and providing good control of postprandial hyperglycemia when taken immediately prior to meals. The rapid action of nateglinide on the beta cells stimulates and restores the normal physiological first and early phase of insulin secretion, consequently reducing postprandial hyperglycemia. This hypoglycemic effect of nateglinide leads to improved glycemic control, while the short duration avoids delayed hyperinsulinemia and hypoglycemia after meals. Nateglinide is not a sulfonylurea, but it shares the mechanism of action of commonly used oral hypoglycemic agents such as glibenclamide and glipizide. Like the recently introduced, short-acting agent, repaglinide, it does not incorporate a sulfonylurea moiety. However, nateglinide's effects on insulin secretion and glycemic control differ significantly from the sulfonylureas and repaglinide in that it preferentially stimulates acute phase insulin, better controls postprandial glucose excursions and spikes, and causes less hyperinsulinemia and hypoglycemia. Compounds with such a profile should not only achieve improved overall glucose control, but also reduce the risk of vascular complications which is the most important feature of nateglinide. Clinical studies with nateglinide have confirmed that it acts rapidly and both restores insulin release and attenuates the postprandial glucose spike. Nateglinide is both effective and well tolerated in the treatment of type 2 diabetes. The reported overall profile of adverse effects appears to be superior to that of other K(ATP) potassium channel blockers, the glucose modulator metformin and PPARgamma agonists such as troglitazone. Clinical comparisons of these agents have shown nateglinide to be more effective in attenuating postprandial glucose than any other oral hypoglycemic agent, and that treatment with both nateglinide and metformin provides additive effects that afford improved control of plasma glucose levels. The administration regimen for nateglinide, immediately prior to meals, also facilitates patient compliance. (c) 2001 Prous Science. All rights reserved.     

Repaglinide : a pharmacoeconomic review of its use in type 2 diabetes mellitus

Repaglinide (Prandin), NovoNorm, GlucoNorm, an oral insulin secretagogue, was the first meglitinide analogue to become available for use in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. The drug lowers postprandial glucose excursions by targeting early-phase insulin release, an effect thought to be important in reducing long-term cardiovascular complications of diabetes. Repaglinide provided similar overall glycaemic control to that achieved with glibenclamide (glyburide), as assessed by glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA(1c)) and fasting blood glucose levels, and was generally well tolerated in well designed clinical trials. Its rapid onset and relatively short duration of action allow for flexible meal schedules. Two modelled US cost-effectiveness analyses projected lifetime costs and outcomes for a hypothetical cohort of patients with type 2 diabetes. Both analyses projected long-term complications using data on HbA(1c) level changes from short-term clinical trials. Repaglinide plus rosiglitazone was dominant over rosiglitazone in one analysis, and repaglinide plus metformin was dominant over nateglinide plus metformin in the other. A similar Canadian analysis showed a favourable incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (相似文献   

Pharmacology and clinical experience with repaglinide

Repaglinide (NovoNorm((R))) is a novel oral antidiabetic agent, the first of a new class of insulin secretagogues known as the prandial glucose regulators to be approved for use in patients with Type 2 diabetes. Prandial glucose regulation is aimed at restoring the first-phase insulin response that follows consumption of a meal, which is missing in patients with Type 2 diabetes. After repaglinide administration, the resulting insulin profile reflects that of healthy individuals more closely, providing tighter glycaemic control and reducing the risk of hypoglycaemic events. Repaglinide is quickly absorbed and rapidly eliminated through biliary excretion, making it suitable for use in patients with renal impairment. It appears in the bloodstream within 15 to 30 min of dosing, stimulating short-term insulin release from the pancreatic beta-cells by binding to a unique site on the beta-cell membrane. Rapid elimination ensures that postprandial insulin levels quickly return to preprandial levels as the high prandial glucose level subsides. Repaglinide is given on a 'one meal, one tablet; no meal, no tablet' basis. It is particularly effective in patients who have not previously been treated with an oral antidiabetic agent, significantly reducing glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA(1c)) levels by 1.6%. It also offers increased mealtime flexibility and safety, compared with other oral antidiabetic agents. As a result of the short plasma half-life and lack of accumulation of repaglinide with repeated dosing, the risk of between-meal and nocturnal hypoglycaemia is substantially reduced compared with other oral antidiabetic agents. Repaglinide acts synergistically with metformin, consistently improving glycaemic control in patients who were insufficiently controlled by metformin alone. Results from recent studies have shown similar synergistic effects with neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH)-insulin or troglitazone.