Phase I and pharmacologic study of sequential topotecan-carboplatin-etoposide in patients with extensive stage small cell lung cancer

The inhibition of topoisomerase I by topotecan results in a compensatory increase in topoisomerase II associated with increased in vitro sensitivity of tumors to etoposide. Maximal synergy has been observed for the sequence of topotecan followed by etoposide. Carboplatin has clinical activity when combined with either of these two agents. These interactions were the pharmacologic rationale for topotecan p.o. days 1-5, carboplatin i.v. day 6, and etoposide p.o. days 6-10. Three successive dose levels were explored: (1) topotecan 2mg/day, carboplatin AUC 5, etoposide 150 mg/day; (2) topotecan 3mg/day, carboplatin AUC 5, etoposide 150 mg/day; and (3) topotecan 3mg/day, carboplatin AUC 5, etoposide 200mg/day. Filgrastim 5 microg/kg/day was injected s.c. days 11-18. Up to 6 cycles were administered every 21 days. Eligible patients had measurable or evaluable, extensive disease, small lung cell lung cancer, no prior chemotherapy, ECOG performance status 0-2, and adequate hematologic, renal, and hepatic function. Follow-up was weekly for CBC. Tumor response was assessed after 2 and 6 cycles. Dose limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as any of the following in cycle 1: grade 3 or 4 non-hematologic toxicity other than nausea and vomiting, grade 4 neutropenia lasting more than 3 days, neutropenic fever or sepsis, grade 4 thrombocytopenia, or failure to recover neutrophils >or=1500/microl or platelets >or=100,000/microl by day 28. Ten patients were enrolled: median age 62 (range, 50-79); female/male 4/6; and performance status 0/1/2 in 2/7/1. Three patients each were treated on dose levels 1 and 2 without DLT. The first 2 patients entered on dose level 3 had no DLT. The third patient on dose level 3 developed grade 4 neutropenia lasting more than 3 days, neutropenic fever, and grade 4 thrombocytopenia on day 15 of cycle 1. The fourth patient on dose level 3 developed grade 4 thrombocytopenia on day 18 of cycle 1. One patient received only 1 cycle and was not evaluable for response. Seven patients completed 6 cycles: 1 had a complete response and 6 achieved a partial response. The third patient on dose level 3 received 2 cycles and had stable disease, but had to be removed from protocol treatment because of grade 4 neutropenia despite dose reduction in cycle 2. The fourth patient on dose level 3 achieved a partial response, but had to be removed from protocol therapy after cycle 5 because of recurrent grade 4 thrombocytopenia. In conclusion, neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were dose-limiting. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) is topotecan 3mg/day p.o. days 1-5, carboplatin AUC 5i.v. day 6, and etoposide 150 mg/day p.o. days 6-10 with filgrastim.     

Phase I and pharmacologic study of sequential topotecan, carboplatin, and etoposide

Inhibition of topoisomerase I by topotecan results in a compensatory increase in topoisomerase II levels associated with increased in vitro sensitivity of tumors to etoposide. Maximum synergy has been observed for the sequence of topotecan followed by etoposide. This is the pharmacologic rationale for the sequence of topotecan 0.4 mg/m(2) per day for 7 days continuous i.v. infusion, carboplatin i.v. on day 8, and etoposide 50 mg per day p.o. days 9 through 20. The carboplatin dosage was escalated from an AUC of 4 to 5 to 6 (Calvert formula). Up to six treatment cycles were administered at 28-day intervals. Eligible patients had metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) or extensive disease small lung cell lung cancer (SCLC), no prior chemotherapy, performance status 0-2, and adequate organ function. Follow-up was twice weekly in the first cycle for CBC and for topotecan and etoposide concentrations. Follow-up, thereafter, was weekly. Tumor response was assessed after two and six cycles and then as clinically indicated. At carboplatin AUCs of 4 and 5, no NCI grade 4 toxicity was observed in cycle 1 in cohorts of three patients each. At the AUC of 5, two patients experienced dose-limiting events after cycle 3, one grade 4 neutropenia lasting >3 days (no fever) and one failure to recover an absolute neutrophil count >1500/microl by day 35. This was, therefore, deemed the maximal tolerable dose. Number of treatment cycles per patient ranged between 1 and 6, and three patients completed six cycles. All patients were male, age 47-71, with NSCLC in one and SCLC in six. The patient with NSCLC had progressive disease after one cycle. One complete and three partial responses were observed in five patients with SCLC. Mean steady-state plasma concentrations during topotecan infusion ranged from 0.73 to 1.69 ng/ml, and mean etoposide concentrations ranged from 60 to 230 ng/ml. This sequence of topotecan, carboplatin, and etoposide appeared tolerable and active. Neutropenia was the dose-limiting toxicity.     

Urinary-derived Monocyte-Colony Stimulating Factor (P-100) following treatment with carboplatin and etoposide in small cell lung cancer (SCLC)

Background: The hematopoietic growth factor P-100 is a monocyte-colonystimulating factor purified from human urine and has been reportedto reduce neutropenia following chemotherapy. In this studythe effect and toxicity of P-100 was evaluated in 26 patientsreceiving intensive chemotherapy for SCLC. Study design: Chemotherapy consisted of four 28 day cycles ofcarboplatin (C) 600 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1 of cycle 1 + 2 and 300mg/m2 i.v. on day 1 of cycle 3 + 4 and etoposide (E) 120 mg/m2i.v. on day 1–3 of each cycle. Patients were randomisedto receive P-100 for ten days following chemotherapy duringeither the first or second cycle. 12 Patients received P-100with the first and 12 with the second cycle. For each groupcycles with P-100 were compared to cycles without P-100. Results: P-100 was well tolerated but no significant differencesbetween cycles with and without P-100 were seen in the administeredchemotherapy dose, depth and duration of neutropenia, numberof blood or platelet transfusions, WHO grade 3–4 infectionor requirement for intravenous antibiotics. Of 24 evaluablepatients 14 (58.3%) achieved CR and 4 (16.6%) PR. Patients achievingCR received radiotherapy. The median time to progression was169 days (range 38–995+ days) and the median survivaltime was 305 days (range 42–1052+ days). Three patientsare alive after 2 years (11.5%), 2 without relapse (7.7%). Alopecia,nausea and vomiting occurred in all patients but no treatmentrelated deaths occurred. Conclusion: In this study P-100 did not significantly influencethe myelotoxicity associated with carboplatin-etoposide chemotherapyin the treatment of SCLC. urinary-derived Monocyte-Colony Stimulating Factor, P-100, carboplatin, etoposide, SCLC     

Carboplatin and etoposide for recurrent malignant glioma following surgical and radiotherapy failure: A clinical study conducted at the Northern Israel Oncology Center.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: We conducted a phase II study using carboplatin and etoposide on patients with recurrent malignant glioma to investigate tumor response. METHODS: From January 1995 to March 1997, 21 patients with recurrent malignant glioma were treated with a carboplatin (300 mg/m(2), day 1)/etoposide (100 mg/m(2), days 1-3) regimen every 3-4 weeks. The following radiologic parameters were evaluated: tumor size, central lucency, degree of contrast enhancement, and mass effect. No patient had received chemotherapy previously. Dose escalation corresponded to hematologic tolerance and to general and neurologic performance status. Most patients were treated postoperatively with involved field radiotherapy followed by a boost to the tumor area, as defined on the presurgery computed tomography scan or on magnetic resonance imaging. Mean interval to introduction of chemotherapy was 8.8 months (range, 7-36 months). Patients received a mean of four cycles [range, 2-8 cycles]. RESULTS: Only 2 patients showed moderate radiological response, while 12 patients died of progressive disease. Mean time to progression following discontinuation of chemotherapy was 5.8 months (range, 1-11 months). The other patients survived with persistent disease and are being treated palliatively. Toxicity was manageable (1, neutropenic sepsis; 1, thrombocytopenia (45,000/mm(3)); 2, temporarily elevated transaminase level; 2, steroid-induced erosive gastritis). CONCLUSIONS: This phase II regimen proved to be ineffective in recurrent malignant glioma. Further studies incorporating innovative drug regimens and schedules are warranted. J. Surg. Oncol., 1999;71:167-170.     

Double-blind randomized study on the myeloprotective effect of melatonin in combination with carboplatin and etoposide in advanced lung cancer.

A significant myeloprotective effect of melatonin in mice treated with etoposide, cyclophosphamide or carboplatin has been reported. The present study was designed to evaluate if the same effect could be observed in patients receiving chemotherapy. Twenty previously untreated patients with inoperable lung cancer received two cycles of carboplatin (given at area under the curve 5 by the Calvert formula) on day 1 and etoposide (150 mg m(-2) i.v.) on days 1-3 every 4 weeks. Melatonin 40 mg or placebo (double-blind) was given orally in the evening for 21 consecutive days, starting 2 days before chemotherapy. Patients were randomized to receive melatonin either with the first or the second cycle. Complete blood cell count with differential was done three times per week for 3 weeks. The median age of the cohort was 60 years (range 42-69), 16 patients had non-small cell and four patients small-cell lung cancer, 12 stage III and eight stage IV disease. In a multivariate analysis including age, sex, diagnosis, stage, performance status, doses of carboplatin and etoposide, and concomitant treatment with melatonin or placebo, the haematological parameters--depth and duration of toxicity for haemoglobin, platelets and neutrophils (ANC)--were not significantly different between cycles with/without melatonin. The mean ANC nadir and the mean number of days with ANC < 0.5 x 10(9) l(-1) were 0.5 x 10(9) l(-1) and 2.5 days, respectively, with/without melatonin. We concluded that, in patients with lung cancer, melatonin given orally at a dose of 40 mg per day for 21 days in the evening, does not protect against the myelotoxic effect of carboplatin and etoposide.     

健择联合卡铂治疗70岁以上进展期非小细胞肺癌患者的观察

目的观察健择联合卡铂方案治疗70岁以上老年进展期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的疗效及副反应,评价该方案的可行性。方法对采用健择联合卡铂化疗的44例进展期NSCLC患者(初治)进行回顾性分析,其中70岁以下24例,70岁以上20例。化疗方案:<70岁健择1200mg/m2,d1,8;卡铂AUC=5,d1;≥70岁健择1000mg/m2,d1,8;卡铂AUC=4,d1。每3周重复,至少治疗2周期,2周后评价疗效。结果70岁以下组共完成89周期化疗,平均3.7周期,有效率(CR+PR)45.8%,70岁以上组共完成66周期,平均3.3周期,有效率(CR+PR)40.0%,两组近期有效率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组在Ⅲ~Ⅳ骨髓抑制、严重恶心呕吐、脱发、肝肾功能损害方面差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),70岁以下组严重便秘1例,70岁以上组5例,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组中分别有2例患者化疗后血小板明显升高,1例56岁男性患者发生双下肢深静脉血栓,抗凝治疗后好转。结论健择联合卡铂化疗治疗70岁以上进展期NSCLC,疗效较好,毒副反应可耐受。     

Pharmacokinetic analysis of combination chemotherapy with carboplatin and etoposide in small-cell lung cancer patients undergoing hemodialysis.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to use pharmacokinetic analysis to investigate the efficacy and toxicity of combined chemotherapy with carboplatin (CBDCA) and etoposide (ETP) in small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients with chronic renal failure undergoing hemodialysis (HD). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three SCLC patients with chronic renal failure undergoing HD were treated with CBDCA (300 mg/m(2)) on day 1 and ETP (50 mg/m(2)) on days 1 and 3, followed by HD 1 h after completing the administration of anticancer agents on each day. The pharmacokinetic analysis of CBDCA and ETP was planned for at least the first two courses of the chemotherapy in each patient. RESULTS: Two complete responses and one partial response were achieved in the three patients. Two patients experienced grade 3/4 neutropenia and required blood transfusion due to thrombocytopenia and anemia. Non-hematological toxicities were moderate. The pharmacokinetic analysis revealed that the platinum and the ETP concentrations in the plasma were similar to those in patients with normal renal function during the first 24 h, while the platinum still remained in the plasma for over 90 h. CONCLUSIONS: Chemotherapy with CBDCA (300 mg/m(2) on day 1) and ETP (50 mg/m(2) on day 1, 3) as used in the present study may be a suitable regimen for SCLC patients undergoing HD, although careful attention should be given to hematological toxicities.     

Retreatment with dose-dense weekly cisplatin after previous cisplatin chemotherapy is not complicated by significant neuro-toxicity

Cisplatin induces a cumulative dose-dependent axonal sensory neuropathy. With a cumulative dose over 600 mg/m2, a significant percentage of patients will develop a moderate or severe neuropathy. We retreated patients with progressive or recurrent ovarian cancer after previous platinum-containing chemotherapy with weekly 50-70 mg/m2 cisplatin for six cycles. This group was prospectively followed for the development of neuropathy. Patients received six weekly cycles of either 50 or 70 mg/m2 cisplatin, combined with oral etoposide. Responding patients continued treatment with daily oral etoposide for nine months. Neurological toxicity was assessed with a sensory sum score, the sensory neuropathy common toxicity criteria (CTC) and quantitated sensory analysis of the vibration perception threshold (VPT). Neurological assessment was scheduled at baseline, after three cycles, at the end of cisplatin chemotherapy and at 3 monthly intervals until 1 year after the discontinuation of chemotherapy. The first evaluation carried out in the interval of 1-4 months after the end of weekly cisplatin therapy was taken as the principle evaluation for neurotoxicity because during this time interval the nadir of cisplatin neurotoxicity is to be expected. Of 89 patients evaluated for neurological toxicity, 80 patients were fully evaluable. Forty-nine had received prior cisplatin (median cumulative dosage 450 mg/m2); the others had received prior treatment with carboplatin. Cisplatin pretreated patients had slightly higher neuropathy scores at the start of weekly cisplatin. Almost all cisplatin pretreated patients received six cycles of cisplatin, 29 at 50 mg/m2 and 20 at 70 mg/m2 per cycle. Despite treatment up to an overall cumulative dose of 750-900 mg/m2 cisplatin, only 1 patient discontinued treatment due to neurotoxicity. One other patient developed a grade 3 neuropathy during follow-up. Only a marginal increase of neuropathic signs and symptoms were observed in all the other patients. In multiple regression analysis, the increase in VPT or the sensory sum score was not related to prior treatment (cisplatin or carboplatin). Patients with mild signs of neuropathy after prior treatment with cisplatin to a cumulative dose level of 400-450 mg/m2 can be retreated with weekly cisplatin to a cumulative dose of 420 mg/m2 (overall cumulative dose up to 800-900 mg/m2) with only a minimal risk of significant neurotoxicity.     

A dose and schedule finding study of gemcitabine and etoposide in patients with progressive non-small cell lung cancer after platinum containing chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Combination chemotherapy improves survival in patients with disseminated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Gemcitabine is active against NSCLC and etoposide has an additive effect in vitro. We describe a dose finding study for the combination of these drugs. PATIENTS AND METHODS: NSCLC patients progressive after chemotherapy received gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2 days 1, 8, 15) and one of five etoposide schedules in doses ranging from 60 to 100 mg/m2 per day administered on days 1-3 (schedules 1-2) or 8-10 (schedules 3-5). RESULTS: 23 patients (median age 59 years) were entered. Number of patients and cycles evaluable for toxicity was 22 and 75. Non-hematological toxicity was mild. In cycle 1 leukocytopenia grade III/IV was observed in 33 and 56% of the patients treated with etoposide 60 and 80 mg/m2 days 1-3 and in 50% treated with etoposide 60 and 80 mg/m2 days 8-10. During cycle 1 thrombocytopenia grade III/IV was observed in 0, 33, 0 and 33% of these patients, respectively. Both patients treated at etoposide 100 mg/m2 days 8-10 experienced febrile leukocytopenia. During cycle 1 single doses of gemcitabine were administered as planned more frequently in patients receiving etoposide 80 mg/m2 per day on days 8-10 compared to etoposide days 1-3 (83 versus 70%). Postponement of combination gemcitabine and etoposide was not necessary. The overall response rate was 21% (95% confidence interval 3-39%) with a median duration of 7.5 + months in this dose finding study. CONCLUSIONS: Combined gemcitabine etoposide is feasible in patients with progressive NSCLC. The optimal combination was gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 per day on days 1, 8 and 15 and etoposide 80 mg/m2 per day on days 8-10 of each 28-day cycle. The response rate of 21% warrants further investigation in patients with advanced NSCLC.     

Risk-adapted chemotherapy of germ cell tumors with carboplatin, etoposide and bleomycin for low-risk and cisplatin, etoposide and ifosfamide for high-risk patients. A single-center study

The prognosis of germ cell tumors treated with chemotherapy depends on the presence of nonseminomatous tumor, clinical parameters based on the tumor volume and site, as well as on the level of the tumor markers AFP, betaHCG and LDH. We report here on the results of a risk-adapted approach to the chemotherapy of germ cell tumors. Patients with low-risk tumors, defined as seminomatous disease and/or nonseminomatous disease with a tumor mass <10 cm, less than 20 lung metastases, no liver, bone, or CNS metastases, and levels of AFP <1,000 IU/ml and betaHCG <10,000 IU/l, were to receive 4 cycles of carboplatin 400 mg/m(2) i.v. day 1, etoposide 120 mg/m(2) i.v. days 1-3 and bleomycin 30 IU i.v. days 1, 8 and 15 during the first 3 cycles (CEB(90)). Patients with high-risk disease were to receive 4 cycles of ifosfamide 1,500 mg/m(2) continuous infusion on days 1-4 together with mesna 1,200 mg/m(2) days 1-5, cisplatin 20 mg/m(2) i.v. days 1-5 and etoposide 100 mg/m(2) i.v. days 1-5 (VIP). Of the 60 patients treated with this risk-adapted approach, 51 had low-risk and 9 had high-risk disease. Forty-five of 51 patiens treated with CEB(90) achieved complete remission (CR), 4 achieved partial remission with marker negativity. Four patients with CR relapsed between 4 to 8 months after the start of chemotherapy. Of the 6 patients failing CEB(90), 3 were treated successfully with surgery or further chemotherapy. With a median follow-up of 52 months, the estimated cause-specific 3-year survival is 93% (95% confidence interval, CI, 80-98%). Seven of 9 high-risk patients treated with VIP achieved a CR and 1 patient relapsed. All 3 patients failing VIP had successful salvage therapy. With a medium follow-up of 63 months all patients remain alive and free of disease. Forty-six patients receiving CEB(90) were retrospectively classified to be in the good prognosis group according to the international germ cell consensus classification. Their estimated 3-year survival was 95% (CI 81-99%). We thus confirm that CEB(90) is a well-tolerated outpatient regimen with good results in good prognosis germ cell tumors. Bleomycin at a cumulative dose of 270 U might contribute substantially to the inferior effect of carboplatin as compared to cisplatin. However, in view of the results of randomized studies favoring cisplatin over carboplatin, it is not recommended to use this regimen outside a clinical trial.     

Carboplatin and CPT-11 chemotherapy in a hemodialysis patient with small-cell lung cancer

We administered a dose-down chemotherapy, which was a combination of carboplatin 100 mg/body (AUC 3.0, day 1) and CPT-11 30 mg/m2 (day 1, day 15) to the patient with a poor performance status of extensive small-cell lung cancer with renal failure. Hemodialysis was performed two hours after the chemotherapy. We measured plasma levels of total-platinum and CPT-11 and metabolic products (SN-38) after the hemodialysis. The results of pharmacokinetic study showed a high level collection of total-platinum caused by carboplatin and SN-38, and that was caused by CPT-11 in the blood. Although the grade 3 of granulocytopenia was found, the decrease in tumor marker and an improvement of the ADL were confirmed. It thought that this chemotherapeutic regimen was effective for small-cell lung cancer with renal failure undergoing hemodialysis. Further study is needed for a selection of suitable chemotherapeutic regimens, an optimal dosage of each drug and timing of hemodialysis.     

Effective combination chemotherapy using paclitaxel in the treatment of a small-cell lung cancer patient resistant to multiple drugs]

We used paclitaxel to successfully treat a patient with small-cell lung cancer resistant to multiple drugs. The patient was diagnosed with small-cell lung cancer (cT4N2M1, extensive disease) and initially treated with CDDP 80 mg/m2 (day 1) + etoposide 100 mg/m2 (day 1-3) from August 1996 (4 courses). A partial response (PR) was obtained, but there was a gradual regrowth in the primary site after 17 months. The next chemotherapy was weekly chemotherapy (CODE regimen) from May 1998 for 5 weeks, but the response was no change (NC). After the therapy, a regrowth of the primary site was observed, and a CT scan demonstrated multiple metastases of the lung and liver. From March 1999, he was administered the next chemotherapy regimen of carboplatin (CBDCA) 350 mg/m2 (day 1) + etoposide 100 mg/m2 (day 1-3) (2 courses). However, the response was NC again. From August 1999, we changed the chemotherapy regimen and administered CBDCA AUC 5 (day 1) + paclitaxel (TXL) 175 mg/m2, (day 1, 3-hour-infusion) (1 course). A chest radiograph showed an extreme shrinkage of the primary and metastatic sites. A PR was obtained, but Grade 4 neutropenia and thrombocytepenia were observed with this therapy. Thus, he was treated with TXL alone (100 mg/m2, day 1, 1-hour-infusion) in the next course. After this therapy, a chest radiograph showed a more extreme shrinkage of the primary and metastatic sites. It is suggested that combination chemotherapy using TXL is effective in the treatment of a patient with small-cell lung cancer resistant to multiple drugs.     

Dose escalating study of biweekly gemcitabine and carboplatin in patients with advanced cancer

Combination chemotherapy with gemcitabine and carboplatin administered on a 3-week cycle is used commonly in the treatment of cancer. The purpose of our study was to establish a safe dose of combined gemcitabine and carboplatin when administered on a biweekly schedule to patients with advanced solid tumors. Gemcitabine was given intravenously over 30 minutes followed by carboplatin also given intravenously over 30 minutes once every 2 weeks (one cycle). Five dose levels were examined, ranging from gemcitabine at 1250 mg/m2 to 2000 mg/m2 and carboplatin at an area under the curve of 2.5 to 3.0. Twenty-six patients were studied (18 male and 8 female) with a median age of 57 years (range, 41-83 years); ECOG performance status was 0 or 1 in 22 patients (85%); median number of prior chemotherapy regimens was 2 (range, 0-4); median number of cycles administered per patient was 3 (range, 1-9) with a total of 89 cycles. Two dose-limiting toxicities were observed. Delay in treatment was seen in a total of 8 cycles with 6 of the delays due to myelosuppression. Grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxicity rates were as follows: anemia in one cycle (1%), neutropenia in 13 cycles (15%), and thrombocytopenia in one cycle of chemotherapy (1%). There were no hospitalizations for neutropenic fever. Mild fatigue was the most common nonhematologic toxicity. The median time to progression was 40 days (mean, 49 days; range, 4-133 days). Of the 21 evaluable patients, partial response or stable disease was observed in 11 (42%). The maximum tested dose of gemcitabine at 2000 mg/m2 and carboplatin at area under the curve of 3.0 was well tolerated on a biweekly schedule. Our findings indicate that further investigation of this biweekly regimen is warranted in patients with advanced cancer.     

A novel triplet regimen with paclitaxel, carboplatin and gemcitabine (PACCAGE) as induction chemotherapy for locally advanced unresectable non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

Phase II study of 3 cycles of triplet induction chemotherapy (response, toxicity) followed by radiotherapy in locally advanced non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). BACKGROUND: Patients with locally advanced inoperable non-small cell lung cancer are currently treated with concomitant or sequential chemotherapy and radiotherapy. However, the outcome of existing treatment modalities is unsatisfactory. Development of new strategies including more efficient systemic chemotherapy is warranted. OBJECTIVE: To study the antitumour activity and toxicity of a triplet combination of paclitaxel, carboplatin and gemcitabine as induction chemotherapy before radiotherapy, in locally advanced NSCLC and to evaluate time to progression and survival. METHODS: Three cycles of paclitaxel (175 mg/m(2) by 3h infusion on day 1), carboplatin (AUC 5mg/(mlmin) by IV bolus on day 1) and gemcitabine (1000 mg/m(2) by IV bolus on day 1 and 8) were administered every 3 weeks in reasonably fit patients. Fractionated radiotherapy with curative intent was initiated 4 weeks after the last chemotherapy administration. Toxicity was assessed weekly during cycle 1 and on day 1 and 8 in cycles 2 and 3. Response evaluation was performed at the end of cycle 3. RESULTS: Forty-eight patients (20 stage IIIA and 28 stage IIIB) received a total of 134 cycles of chemotherapy. Forty-two patients received the intended 3 cycles. Thirty patients obtained an objective response (1 complete and 29 partial response) or 62.5% on the intent to treat analysis (95% confidence interval: 49-76%). None of the responders became eligible for surgery. The median time to progression and survival for all patients was 10.1 and 15.7 month, respectively. A significant difference was observed in survival parameters between stage IIIA and stage IIIB patients. Haematological toxicity grade 3/4, mainly neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, was most prominent on day 15 of the treatment cycles. Haematological support by means of recombinant erythropoietin, red blood cell or platelet transfusion, filgrastim administration or a combination was needed in 21 patients. None of the patients discontinued chemotherapy because of haematotoxicity. Grade 3/4 non-haematological toxicity leading to chemotherapy withdrawal occurred early during induction (2 and 1 in cycles 1 and 2, respectively). CONCLUSION: Three cycles of the novel triplet combination of paclitaxel, carboplatin and gemcitabine (PACCAGE) is an active and feasible induction regimen for patients with locally advanced inoperable NSCLC. Neutropenia and to a lesser extent thrombocytopenia represent the main haematological toxicity. Whether this triplet regimen can improve outcome when compared to specific cisplatin doublet regimens should be evaluated in a phase III study.     

Ifosfamide, carboplatin and etoposide in children with poor-risk relapsed Wilms' tumor: a Children's Cancer Group report.

BACKGROUND: The outcome of children with relapsed Wilms' tumor is poor, especially with poor-risk factors such as unfavorable histology, early recurrence, previous three-drug therapy, relapse not confined to lungs and abdominal relapse following abdominal radiotherapy. We report the overall response rate, progression-free survival and overall survival of 11 children with relapsed and poor-risk Wilms' tumor following ifosfamide/carboplatin/etoposide (ICE) chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: ICE therapy consisted of ifosfamide 1800 mg/m2/day (on day 0-4), carboplatin 400 mg/m2/day (on day 0-1) and etoposide 100 mg/m2/day (on day 0-4). The median age at diagnosis was 39 months (range from 13 months to 16 years) and the median time to relapse after initial diagnosis was 9 months (range 4-72 months). All but one patient had at least one poor prognostic feature, with eight patients showing three or four. RESULTS: After ICE chemotherapy the number of patients showing a complete response (CR) was three (27%) and a partial response (PR) was six (55%). The overall response rate (CR+PR) was 82%. Five of the six patients with a PR subsequently achieved a CR with further therapy. The 3-year event-free survival and overall survival were 63.6 +/- 14.5%. CONCLUSIONS: The response rate in children with relapsed and poor-risk Wilms' tumor is >80% with ICE re-induction chemotherapy followed by post-ICE therapy. The optimal approach for post-ICE consolidation therapy has yet to be determined.     

Pharmacokinetic analysis of carboplatin in patients with cancer who are undergoing hemodialysis

Purpose

To examine the safety of carboplatin-based chemotherapy and the applicability of the Calvert formula in patients with cancer who are undergoing hemodialysis.

Methods

We treated two patients who were undergoing hemodialysis and received carboplatin-based chemotherapy to treat non-small-cell lung cancer or ovarian cancer. The dose of carboplatin was calculated by the Calvert formula. Glomerular filtration rate was considered to be 0, and the target area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) was 4 (carboplatin dose, 100 mg) for patient 1 and 5 (125 mg) for patient 2. Carboplatin was administered as a 1-h intravenous infusion on day 1. Hemodialysis was performed for 3 or 4 h, starting 24 h after the infusion of carboplatin had begun. Heparinized blood samples were collected during the first cycle of chemotherapy.

Results

The AUCs in patients 1 and 2 were 4.7 and 6.1 (mg/ml min), which were about 20% higher than the target values (4 and 5 mg/ml min, respectively). In the absence of hemodialysis, the hypothetical AUCs were 6.2 and 7.6 (mg/ml min), respectively. The pre-dialysis body clearances of carboplatin were 16.1 and 16.5 ml/min, with elimination half-lives of 17.5 and 13.8 h, respectively.

Conclusion

By performing hemodialysis 24 h after the start of chemotherapy, we obtained reproducible and robust AUC data. Use of the Calvert formula allowed carboplatin-based chemotherapy to be performed safely. Our results suggest that the non-renal clearance of carboplatin is lower in Japanese patients than in non-Asian patients.     

Early concurrent chemoradiotherapy with prolonged oral etoposide and cisplatin for limited-stage small-cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND: Combined chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is the standard treatment modality for limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (LSCLC), but the optimal timing of radiation is controversial. Prolonged oral etoposide has the advantage of prolonged exposure, which possibly leads to improved clinical outcome. We conducted a phase II trial of early concurrent CRT, starting from the very beginning of the first cycle of chemotherapy for previously untreated LSCLC. METHODS: Chemotherapy was given for six cycles, each consisting of oral etoposide (50 mg/m(2) daily from day 1 to 14) and intravenous cisplatin (75 mg/m(2) on day 1), every 3 weeks. Thoracic radiation therapy was given from day 1 of the first cycle of chemotherapy, administered at 2.0 Gy in 22 daily fractions to a total dose of 44 Gy. RESULTS: Forty-four patients were enrolled. The median age was 60 years (range, 42-77 years), including 15 patients (34%) over 65 years-of-age. We observed a complete response rate of 52% (95% CI, 37-67%), and an overall response rate of 88% in an intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis. Median overall survival was 14.9 months (95% CI, 11.4-18.3 months) and the median time to progression was 10.8 months (95% CI, 9.3-12.4 months) for the ITT population. In 220 cycles, grade 3-4 neutropenia was observed in 48% of cycles and grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia in 30% of cycles. Neutropenic fever was observed in 18 patients (41%). CONCLUSIONS: Early concurrent CRT, starting from the very beginning of the first cycle of chemotherapy with prolonged oral etoposide and cisplatin failed to show any improvement in survival compared with other CRT regimens.     

Docetaxel in combination with carboplatin for the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma: a multicentre phase I study

Docetaxel and carboplatin have shown in vitro and in vivo activity against non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A phase I study was conducted in order to determine the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and the maximum tolerated doses (MTDs) of their combination. Chemotherapy-na?ve patients with stage IIIB and IV NSCLC, age<75 years old, performance status (WHO) 0-2, with adequate bone marrow, renal, liver and cardiac function, were treated with docetaxel and carboplatin. Docetaxel was given at escalated doses starting from 70 mg/m(2) with increments of 10 mg/m(2) followed by carboplatin also administered at escalated doses starting from AUC 5 to 7 AUC (mg/ml. min); the regimen was administered every 3 weeks. No colony-stimulating factor or intrapatient escalation was allowed. The toxicity of the regimen was assessed during the first chemotherapy cycle. 35 enrolled patients received a total of 114 chemotherapy cycles (median 3 cycles/patient; range: 1-8). All patients were assessable for toxicity. Neutropenia was the main dose-limiting toxicity of the regimen; overall, grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred in 16 (14%) cycles; six (5%) neutropenic episodes were complicated with fever but there was no septic death. Grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia was uncommon (two cycles; 2%). Grade 3/4 diarrhoea occurred in 5 (14%) patients whilst neurotoxicity, fatigue and mucositis were extremely uncommon. Two MTDs were defined: the MTD(1) was docetaxel 80 mg/m(2) and carboplatin AUC 7 mg/ml x min whilst MTD(2) was docetaxel 100 mg/m(2) and carboplatin AUC 6 mg/ml x min. The combination of docetaxel and carboplatin is a feasible and well-tolerated outpatient regimen for the treatment of patients with locally advanced and metastatic NSCLC. This regimen merits further investigation in phase II trials.     

A multicentre phase II study of carboplatin and prolonged oral etoposide in the treatment of cancer of unknown primary site (CUPS).

Cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy is frequently used to treat patients with carcinoma of unknown primary site (CUPS). Response rates in the literature range from 12% to 26% and median survival from 5 to 7 months. The goal of this study was to evaluate the combination of carboplatin and prolonged oral etoposide in patients with CUPS, with the hope of minimizing toxicity but improving efficacy and convenience. Treatment consisted of carboplatin, 300 mg m(-2) on day 1, and oral etoposide 50 mg on days 1-20, every 4 weeks for up to nine cycles. A total of 33 patients were treated and all were evaluable for toxicity. Non-haematological toxicity was mild to moderate, with the exception of one case of grade 4 stomatitis. Grade 4 leucopenia was observed in eight (24%) patients and sepsis in four (12%), with two and possibly three treatment-related deaths. For the 26 patients evaluable for response, the response rate was 23% with responses lasting a median of 11 months (range 7-13 months), with one patient still responding at 12 months. An additional nine patients (35%) had stable disease. Median survival for all patients was 5.6 months (range 2 weeks to 33 months). The combination of carboplatin with prolonged oral etoposide has moderate activity similar to that of other platinum-based regimens and is a well tolerated, convenient, outpatient regimen. Dosing according to estimated creatinine clearance to achieve a carboplatin AUC of 6.0 mg ml(-1) min might have decreased the incidence of severe myelotoxicity without compromising the regimen''s efficacy.