Simultaneous reconstruction of large skin and mucosal defect following head and neck surgery with a single skin paddle pectoralis major myocutaneous flap

The pectoralis major myocutaneous (PMMC) flap is commonly used for head and neck reconstruction especially in impoverished nations. PMMC is a sturdy pedicled flap with relatively fewer complications, the learning curve is short and no specialized training in microvascular surgery is needed in order to use this flap. In a defect that requires a large skin and mucosal lining the authors routinely use either a bi-paddle PMMC or a combination of PMMC (for the mucosal lining) and a delto-pectoral flap (for the skin defect). It is indisputable that free tissue transfer is a better way of reconstruction for the majority of most such defects. Unfortunately, not all patients can be offered this form of reconstruction due to the cost, time, expertise and infrastructural constraints in high volume centres such as ours. Bi-paddling of PMMC is hazardous in obese males and most female patients. In such patients the skin defect is reconstructed usually by the delto-pectoral (DP) flap but this, for obvious reasons, is less welcomed by the patients. The authors suggest a technique wherein mucosal lining is created by the myofascial lining (inner surface) of the flap and the skin defect is reconstructed by the skin paddle of the single paddle PMMC. It should be considered wherever a DP flap is unacceptable, or bi-paddling or free tissue transfer is not possible.     

Versatilidad del colgajo microvascularizado antebraquial radial en la reconstrucción de cabeza y cuello. Una serie de 58 casos

IntroductionThe radial forearm free flap (RFFF) is a widely used tool in head and neck reconstructive surgery. It stands out as a relatively simple flap to achieve; it is versatile and has features that enable the reconstruction of complex head and neck defects. The aim of the study was to present our results using the RFFF in the reconstruction of seated defects in the head and neck area.Material and methodsA retrospective, observational and analytical study that included 58 cases of RFFF interventions, performed between January 2002 and July 2019. The data studied were the age and sex of the patients, location of the tumour, histological type, previous radiation therapy, number of venous anastomoses performed in the surgery and body temperature in the immediate postoperative period, at 24 and 48 hours following surgery.ResultsThe percentage of viable RFFF was 82.8%. None of the variables analysed appear to be a risk factor for flap failure. The most frequent cause of flap failure was venous thrombosis.ConclusionsMicrovascularised flaps play an important role in reconstructive surgery, being the RFFF one of the most interesting for head and neck reconstruction. It is a very versatile tool that allows the reconstruction of many of the sites where the head and neck surgeon operates.     

Deltopectoral flap revisited in the microvascular era: a single-institution 10-year experience

OBJECTIVES: In 1965, Bakamjian described the deltopectoral (DP) flap as a reconstructive option in head and neck surgery. It served as the premier flap for reconstructing complex head and neck defects until the late 1970s. Today, the DP flap is often overlooked; although its role has diminished, its use is still warranted in certain select clinical situations. METHODS: A retrospective patient chart review of 25 DP flap procedures performed at the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics and Iowa City Veterans Administration Hospital between January 1, 1991, and June 1, 2002, was undertaken. The data collected included patient demographics and assessment of DP flap survival and its ability to accomplish established preoperative reconstructive goals. RESULTS: The DP flap was used for the following situations: vascularized skin coverage of the neck, carotid arteries, and face (16 cases), including simultaneous coverage of other reconstructive flaps in 6 cases; controlled orocutaneous fistula development (3 cases) or fistula closure (5 cases); and pharyngoesophageal reconstruction (4 cases). In 3 cases the flap was used for more than one of the preoperative goals described above (n = 25). Minor flap-related complications that required local wound treatment developed in 5 cases (20.0%), but the flaps were successfully salvaged and no subsequent reconstructive procedure was required. In an additional 5 cases (20.0%), the flap failed in some measure to accomplish its preoperative goal, necessitating further surgical reconstruction. Sixteen patients (64%) had undergone previous or simultaneous reconstructive procedures that limited other available reconstructive options. CONCLUSIONS: The technical simplicity of the DP flap, coupled with its predictable vascular supply, has allowed it to maintain a niche role in contemporary reconstructive surgery. The DP flap provides an excellent method of reconstruction in select cases in which vascularized skin coverage of the neck is needed. The DP flap also provides a valuable salvage option in situations in which other reconstructive techniques are not possible.     

Enhanced Reliability and Renewed Applications of the Deltopectoral Flap in Head and Neck Reconstruction

Bakamjian introduced the deltopectoral skin flap in 1965, and thereafter it was used extensively for reconstructive surgery of the head and neck. Flap failure rates of 10% to 25% were reported, necessitating the development of alternative methods of reconstruction and eventually relegating the flap to historical references. Since 1991, we have used the deltopectoral flap in 24 patients for reconstruction after head and neck tumor surgery. Simple technical modifications have been used to enhance the reliability of this flap, with no observed failures or even partial flap loss. The deltopectoral flap remains a versatile and reliable tissue source that can be used simultaneously with the pectoralis major myocutaneous flap for a variety of complex head and neck reconstructions. Laryngoscope, 106:1230-1233, 1996     

Utilization of intestinal clamps for precise cutting of the pectoralis major muscle while raising a myocutaneous flap

A variety of approaches have been employed for the reconstruction of head and neck defects and most of the techniques involve the use of arterialized vascular flaps alone, or in conjunction with other regional or local tissues. We frequently use a pectoralis major myocutaneous (PMMC) flap in our hospital in addition to other pedicled or free tissue transfers. A PMMC flap is a reliable flap with acceptable complications, needs a small learning curve, takes less time, and does not require additional investment (i.e. microscopes, loops etc). The disadvantages of the PMMC flap is that it has a restricted arc of rotation, gives a cosmetically unacceptable bulk in the neck, it is difficult in females and causes significant shoulder dysfunction. We have made a small improvization in the flap-raising technique which is helpful for the surgeon. This involves utilization of intestinal clamps to hold and cut the pectoralis major muscle.     

Pectoralis myocutaneous flap in head and neck cancer reconstruction

This review of 50 consecutive myocutaneous flaps provided an opportunity to assess the value of this particular reconstructive technique in head and neck cancer surgery. There is no question that the flap has certain disadvantages. In this series, it was not found to be a reliable means of one-stage pharyngoesophageal reconstruction. However, its technical ease, versatility, and reliability as a one-stage reconstructive technique strongly outweigh any disadvantages and prove it to be a valuable recent addition to head and neck cancer surgery reconstruction.     

Superior based trapezius flap

The most revolutionary innovation in reconstructive surgery of the past decade is the development of the musculocutaneous flaps. These flaps permit the reconstruction of large head and neck defects in one stage. They carry on excellent reliable blood supply and the inclusion of the underlying muscle adds sorely needed bulk to the resected area. The trapezius musculocutaneous flap is one of the most versatile. Its color and texture match for facial reconstruction is excellent. Moreover, the pliability of the cutaneous component lends itself well to lining the oral cavity ond the oropharynx. The trapezius musculocutaneous flap is an outstanding advance in head and neck reconstructive surgery. The discovery that it can be successfully pedicled superiorly greatly enhances its versatility.     

Second reconstructions after failure of free-tissue transfer in the head and neck region

A retrospective study was performed on 74 patients seen in our hospital between 1990 and 1999 who underwent head and neck reconstructive surgery involving a free flap. Reconstructive surgery was unsuccessful in 5 cases (6.8%). A pedicled myocutaneus flap was used in two cases for the second reconstruction attempt, while a second free flap (jejunum) was used in two other patients. In these cases, a bilateral neck dissection was performed prior to the second free flap reconstruction and neck infection was found. The head and neck artery and vein were unsuitable as recipient vessels in the second operation. Instead, the cephalic vein was used as a source of vein grafts and as a recipient vein.     

Resident training in head and neck flap reconstruction in U.S. academic otolaryngology programmes

The main objective of this study was to assess resident training in head and neck flap reconstruction, and to determine the confidence of graduating residents in performing these flaps independently. Questionnaires were distributed to otolaryngology residents graduating in 1997. Respondents recorded the number of pedicled and free flap procedures they performed, or assisted with, and indicated flaps they felt confident about performing independently. Pectoralis major myocutaneous (PMMC) (n = 560, mean 6.59) and radial forearm (RF) (66, 0.78) were the most common pedicled and free flaps performed. There was a significant difference (p = 0.0002, Mann-Whitney U test) between median confidence for pedicled (44.5 per cent) and free flaps (two per cent). Ten of the 17 flaps showed a significant Pearson correlation (p < 0.05) between number of procedures performed and confidence in performing them independently. Of the pedicled flaps, latissimus dorsi (LD) showed good correlation (r = 0.67), PMMC showed low correlation (r = 0.19) and other pedicled flaps fair correlation. Of the free flaps, LD (r = 0.64) and fibula (r = 0.50) showed good correlation and rectus abdominis and RF fair correlation. There was a fair inverse correlation (r = -0.29) between numbers of pedicled and free flaps performed. Higher correlation in flaps uncommonly performed reflects greater operative training necessary to achieve the confidence for performing these flaps independently. As respondents performed greater numbers of free flaps, the number of pedicled flaps decreased. It might thus be important to train residents in all aspects of pedicled flaps. Most respondents were of the opinion that additional training in free flaps was necessary for those planning a career in head and neck reconstructive surgery.     

Latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap for secondary head and neck reconstruction.

PURPOSE: To review our experience and results with the use of pedicled latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap (LDMF) for secondary reconstruction in head and neck surgery. METHODS: Twenty-two patients had LDMF, 17 of them for secondary reconstruction. Data were collected regarding the primary surgery, primary method of reconstruction, indication for secondary reconstruction, and outcome. RESULTS: Seventeen LDMF procedures were performed for secondary reconstruction. Flap success rate was 100%. Reconstructive goals were achieved immediately in 16 (94.1%) patients. CONCLUSION: LDMF is a thin flap with a large surface area and a long pedicle that allows it to reach any region in the head, neck, and scalp. Its main disadvantages are the need for lateral positioning of the patient and the fact that its pedicle is not protected with muscle. In our experience, LDMF provides an excellent reconstructive option especially in complicated cases of secondary reconstruction. It may be used in cases where a free flap is usually used, but with significantly reduced surgical time.     

Cephalic vein transposition in head-and-neck reconstruction

The advent of free flaps has made it possible to undertake increasingly complex reconstructive surgeries. Many of the patients have already undergone extensive prior surgery, primary free flap reconstruction and/or cervical irradiation. These treatments strongly impact anatomy and tissue quality. The reconstructive surgeon may be faced with a situation where the choice of recipient vessels is limited; in 7% of cases, no cervical vessels are available at all. For venous anastomosis, branches of the internal and external jugular vein are preferentially used, but may have been ligated or be unusable. Venous congestion is one of the most common causes of failure in these situations. The cephalic vein has been described as an alternative for second anastomosis in first line, but is rarely used for early free-flap salvage. Based on a case study, the technique of cephalic vein transposition is illustrated for early salvage of a double free flap for head-and-neck reconstruction. This technique is simple, reliable and rapid. It should be part of the armamentarium of the head and neck reconstructive surgeon.     

Unusual uses of the deltopectoral flap.

For the past decade the deltopectoral flap has become the premier reconstructive tool in oncologic head and neck surgery. It has achieved a level of reliability that has not been approached by any other single flap. Its most common application has been replacement of lost skin either from planned surgical resection or necrosis following ablative surgery. This paper illustrates a few unusual clinical settings in which the deltopectoral flap was used instead of other conventional methods: 1. Use of the same delopectoral flap in two different locations. 2. Employment of the base of the deltopectoral tube for skin coverage. 3. Successful application of bilateral simultaneous deltopectoral flaps. 4. Three-stage reconstruction of the cervical esophagus in a tenuous metabolic setting. 5. Two-stage technique for soft palate replacement. 6. An alteration of the design of the conventional deltopectoral flap because of an upper pectoral abscess.     

Significance of extracorporally perfused microsurgical free flaps

BACKGROUND: Since 30 years microvascular reconstruction has been established in reconstructive plastic head and neck surgery. Since 10 years an extracorporal perfusion set for the vital preservation of microsurgical free tissue flaps of several days has been developed. Now it is the question which significance the extracorporal perfusion of free flaps has today. METHOD: The spectrum of the actual utilization is the parameter which determines the importance. A recommendation on the safe period of use for the vital preservation of microsurgical free flaps making use of the extracorporal perfusion system in room temperature (21 degrees C) is to be developed on the porcine vertical musculocutaneous trapezius flap. RESULTS: The device is regularly used in experimental plastic surgery for the research of pathophysiology of microvascular free flaps. It is frequently used in biotechnology for pharmacological and toxicological tests of the resorption of drugs through the skin and it is useful for the microsurgical training of free flap transplantation. The minimal period of a safe function is 46 hours. CONCLUSIONS: The device is a useful test system for the research of the ischemic period of microsurgical free flaps. Its greatest benefit is its use as a biotechnical test system reducing at the same time the consumption of animals. It is also a useful training device in reconstructive head and neck surgery. It is not suitable for the clinical free flap transplantation in human patients.     

The pectoralis major flap.

The pectoralis major myocutaneous flap (PMC) is a major flap for reconstruction of large head and neck defects. Its principle advantages are its dependability and ability to cover large defects. It is, however, a bulky flap, preventing its use for delicate reconstruction. The PMC flap is justifiably a popular flap that will continue to command an important place in the head and neck surgeon's reconstructive armamentarium.     

Sternocleidomastoid myocutaneous flap

The sternocleidomastoid myocutancous flap has several applications for reconstruction of defects about the head and neck. It is used for augmentation of facial defects, carotid artery protection, and repair of oral cavity defects. Additional reconstructive efforts suggest the sternocleidomastoid myocutancous flap can be used for facial reanimation and as an osteomyocutaneous flap incorporating the clavicle for mandibular reconstruction. Reports of unreliable viability and resection of the sternocleidomastoid muscle during neck dissection decreases the applicability of the flap. Twenty-seven sternocleidomastoid flaps were used in 26 patients for head and neck reconstruction. In contrast to the reported 40% to 50% incidence of superficial slough or total flap necrosis, three (11%) flaps developed superficial (cutaneous) slough while two patients developed inclusion cysts. The technique includes elevation of the sternocleidomastoid muscle with the overlying platysma and skin originally described by Owens. The procedure is modified by removing the epithelium on the tunneled portion of the flap. This allows the flap to be used as a one-stage method of reconstruction without sacrificing the additional blood supply from the platysma and overlying dermis.     

Der transversale Rectus-abdominis-Muskel- (TRAM-)Lappen

BACKGROUND: The microvascular anastomosed transverse rectus abdominis muscle (TRAM) island flap has been successfully used in plastic surgery for more than 10 years. In reconstructive head and neck surgery, however, it is not yet established. METHOD: We analysed the preparation and anatomical variation in TRAM flaps in an examination of eight cadavers. In a clinical case with complete reconstruction of the nose after nasal ablation and complete loss of a radial lower forearm flap that had been transplanted previously due to a recurrent tumor, the possibility of forming and modeling a TRAM flap is demonstrated. RESULTS: The flap vessels of the TRAM are comparable to the radial forearm flap, and the donor site may be primarily closed. The TRAM proved to be a suitable alternative to close lesions of the head and neck area in selected cases. The myocutaneous TRAM is bulkier than the fascio-cutaneous radial forearm flap. The subcutaneous abdominal fat of the TRAM can be reduced in relation to the vascular distribution of the perforator vessels. If the subcutaneous fat of the flap is reduced, the flap can be shaped and formed well. In the described case, it was used to close the lesion after ablation of the nose and middle face. CONCLUSION: The risk of an iatrogenic lesion of the peritoneal fascia or postsurgical herniation of the abdominal wall is low if several surgical prerequisites are taken into consideration. The myocutaneous TRAM will not replace the fascio-cutaneous radial forearm flap in microvascular head and neck surgery, but the large diameter of the donor vessels and the highly vascularized flap tissue makes it an alternative as a second line procedure in cases of unfavorable wound conditions.     

锁骨上皮瓣在头颈修复中的应用及进展

头颈部手术的术后缺损修复是头颈外科医师面临的难点,目前应用于缺损修复的皮瓣很多,包括局部皮瓣、带蒂组织瓣及游离组织瓣,各种皮瓣均有其优缺点.锁骨上区是一个重要的皮瓣供区,其临近头颈部并且皮肤质地与头颈部相似,目前成为头颈修复皮瓣研究的热点,被越来越多的头颈外科医师应用并推崇.本文对锁骨上皮瓣在头颈修复中的应用进展做一综述.     

The trapezius myocutaneous flap. Dependability and limitations

Many reports of the trapezius myocutaneous flap have centered on a single form of the flap. However, three distinct myocutaneous segments, the superior, the lateral island, and the extended island flaps, can be harvested from the trapezius muscle and its overlying skin. Fifty-five patients underwent reconstruction for head and neck defects using 56 trapezius myocutaneous flaps consisting of 28 superior, 24 lateral island, and four extended island flaps. The four vascular supplies of the trapezius muscle are discussed, with emphasis on the variable nature of the transverse cervical and dorsal scapular arteries. Major complications developed in two of 28 superior, five of 24 lateral island, and one of four extended island flaps. The superior flap, although the most dependable, has the most limited range of application. Both the lateral and extended island flaps have a broader range of clinical application, but their usefulness may be limited by previous neck surgery or occult neoplasm in the neck, as well as by the variable vascular supply. Due to the above limitations, 30% of our attempts to utilize the lateral island flap had to be aborted at the time of surgery and an alternate means of reconstruction used. The trapezius myocutaneous flaps are excellent reconstructive tools for selected defects.     

Use of the anterolateral thigh flap for reconstruction of the head and neck

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The anterolateral thigh free flap has achieved recent popularity in North America for the reconstruction of head and neck defects after ablative surgery. The flap is most often based on either the septocutaneous or musculocutaneous perforators of the descending branch of the lateral circumflex femoral artery. Its versatility allows for a subcutaneous, fasciocutaneous, myocutaneous, or adipofascial flap to be obtained. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent publications have described the utility of the anterolateral thigh flap for reconstruction of head and neck defects. It has been used successfully in the reconstruction of the laryngopharynx, oral cavity, oropharynx, external skin, and maxilla. Furthermore, when a thinner flap is needed, a suprafascial anterolateral thigh flap may be raised or the flap may be thinned after it is obtained. SUMMARY: The anterolateral thigh flap is a highly versatile and reliable flap for use in the reconstruction of various soft tissue defects of the head and neck. This flap has gained great popularity in mainland China, Taiwan, and Japan given its versatility, ability for a two-team approach, and minimal donor site morbidity. However, it has not met the same enthusiasm in Europe and North America because of the relative difficulty in perforator dissection, reported variations of the vascular anatomy, and the presumed increased thickness of the anterolateral thigh tissue in the Western population in comparison with the patient population of the Far East. These obstacles may be overcome by increased surgical experience and by the ability to create a thinner suprafascial flap or thinning the flap after it has been obtained.