Interpleural block - part 1

Interpleural blockade is effective in treating unilateral surgical and nonsurgical pain from the chest and upper abdomen in both the acute and chronic settings. It has been shown to provide safe, high-quality analgesia after cholecystectomy, thoracotomy, renal and breast surgery, and for certain invasive radiological procedures of the renal and hepatobiliary systems. It has also been used successfully in the treatment of pain from multiple rib fractures, herpes zoster, complex regional pain syndromes, thoracic and abdominal cancer, and pancreatitis. The technique is simple to learn and has both few contra-indications and a low incidence of complications. In the first of two reviews, the authors cover the history, taxonomy and anatomical considerations, the spread of local anaesthetic, and the mechanism of action, physiological, pharmacological and technical considerations in the performance of the block.     

Interpleural block - part 2

Interpleural blockade is effective in treating unilateral surgical and non-surgical pain from the chest and upper abdomen in both the acute and chronic settings. It has been shown to provide safe, high-quality analgesia after cholecystectomy, thoracotomy, renal and breast surgery, and for certain invasive radiological procedures of the renal and hepatobiliary systems. It has also been used successfully in the treatment of pain from multiple rib fractures, herpes zoster, complex regional pain syndromes, thoracic and abdominal cancer, and pancreatitis. The technique is simple to learn and has both few contra-indications and a low incidence of complications. In the second of two reviews, the authors cover the applications, complications, contra-indications and areas for future research.     

Interpleural administration of bupivacaine after cholecystectomy: a comparison with intercostal nerve block

Pethidine requirements and verbal pain scores were recorded in 36 patients after cholecystectomy via subcostal incision. All patients also received 20 ml 0.5% bupivacaine with adrenaline 1/200,000. Group 1 (12 patients) received unilateral intercostal nerve blocks. Interpleural catheters were inserted through the 8th intercostal space in the remaining patients; 12 received local anaesthetic via the catheter immediately after surgery (Group 2) and 12 were given local anaesthetic at three hours (Group 3). Small asymptomatic pneumothoraces were noted on chest X-ray in six of the 24 patients with interpleural catheters. Both types of local anaesthesia produced lower pain scores than pethidine alone (P less than 0.05) with 25% of intercostal nerve blocks and 63% of interpleural catheters requiring no pethidine in the following three hours. The provision of catheter 'top-ups' between six and 18 hours after surgery also resulted in lower pain scores and a reduction in pethidine requirements (P less than 0.05).     

Interpleural block: a new technique for regional anaesthesia during percutaneous nephrostomy and nephrolithotomy

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie - Interpleural block was used in four patients undergoing percutaneous nephrostomy, one of whom also underwent percutaneous...     

Interpleural analgesia after thoracotomy

We examined the effects of the following variables on interpleural analgesia after thoracotomy: addition of epinephrine to local anesthetic, thoracostomy drainage, two-catheter placement, and location of catheter tips. Twenty patients were randomized to have one catheter (paravertebral tip location) or two catheters (paravertebral and lateral thoracic wall tip locations). Interpleural catheters were sutured to the parietal pleura by the surgeon at time of wound closure. Patients were then randomly assigned to receive 20 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine through the single catheter or 10 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine with or without 1:200,000 epinephrine through each of the two catheters while supine. Bupivacaine concentrations in whole blood and in thoracostomy drainage fluid were assayed by gas chromatography. Actual content of bupivacaine in the drainage fluid was calculated. Degree of analgesia was assessed by verbal numerical pain scores over the first 4 h and opioid demand thereafter. Addition of epinephrine to bupivacaine did not influence the degree of analgesia. Approximately 30%-40% of any administered dose of bupivacaine was lost via the thoracostomy tube over a 4-h period. There was no correlation between the true initial dose (100 mg minus thoracostomy drainage) and Cmax. Use of two catheters resulted in significantly less opioid requirements after an initial 8-h period. Failure to achieve adequate interpleural analgesia in postthoracotomy patients may be related to loss of anesthetic via thoracostomy drainage, presence of extravasated blood and tissue fluid in the pleural space, and possibly sequestration and channeling of flow of local anesthetic by restricted motion of an operated lung.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Interpleural analgesia in breast reconstruction.

To investigate the safety and efficacy of interpleural analgesia for postoperative pain control in patients having breast reconstruction we did a retrospective audit of 114 women who had had their breasts reconstructed by the same team. A group of 22 women given morphine postoperatively acted as a historical control. Ninety-two women were given continuous postoperative interpleural bupivacaine with free access to morphine. We recorded complications, morphine consumption, postoperative pain, nausea and vomiting scores, and duration of hospital stay. There was one episode of air entrapment. Morphine consumption was significantly reduced in the interpleural group (p<0.000). Pain scores were similar in all groups (p=0.11). Nausea and vomiting scores were significantly lower in the interpleural group (p=0.04) and hospital stay was shorter in the interpleural group but not significantly so (p<0.9). We conclude that interpleural analgesia improves the quality of postoperative care in breast reconstruction with latissimus dorsi flaps.     

Interpleural analgesia improves pulmonary function after cholecystectomy

The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of interpleural bupivacaine on analgesia and ventilatory capacity after cholecystectomy. Forty-two patients undergoing elective cholecystectomy were randomly assigned to two groups: one to receive interpleural administration of bupivacaine-adrenaline mixture (Group 1 = 22 patients) and the other standard administration of intramuscular meperidine (Group 2 = 20 patients) for postoperative pain relief. The intensity of pain was evaluated by a visual analogue scale (VAS) preoperatively as well as at 2, 8, 24 and 48 hr postoperatively. At the same time, FVC and FEV1.0 measurements were obtained for all patients. The group given interpleural bupivacaine had better pain relief with mean VAS of 0.6 +/- 0.9 (mean +/- SD) 1.1 +/- 1.4, 0.6 +/- 0.9 and 0.8 +/- 1.2 compared with 5.2 +/- 2.2, 5.8 +/- 2.7, 5.5 +/- 2.2 and 4.5 +/- 1.8 for patients receiving meperidine (P less than 0.001). The patients in Group 1 also had larger FVC and FEV than those in Group 2: FVC 22 +/- 14.5 per cent vs 32 +/- 15.2 per cent (P less than 0.005), FEV1.0 25 +/- 15.5 vs 38 +/- 14.8 per cent (P less than 0.001) (mean +/- SD). We conclude that the interpleural analgesia can achieve better pain relief with greater ventilatory capacity than a standard analgesic regimen in the first two days after cholecystectomy.     

Interpleural analgesia does not influence postthoracotomy pain

The management of postthoracotomy pain is a problem and may contribute to atelectasis, leading to hypoxemia, pulmonary infection, and permanent alveolar damage. We sought to determine the efficacy of interpleural analgesia for pain control and to evaluate independent predictors for postoperative pain intensity. Eighty-three patients undergoing elective anterolateral (n = 37) and posterolateral (n = 46) thoracotomy were included in a prospective, randomized, double-blinded trial. Patients were assigned to receive either 0.5% bupivacaine or saline solution interpleurally every 4 h for 10 doses postoperatively. All patients also received patient-controlled analgesics (PCA) with piritramide as the opioid for additional pain control. Pain was assessed on the basis of PCA requirements and by using a visual analog scale. Visual analog scale scores and PCA requirements were not different between groups. Both interpleural bupivacaine and saline significantly reduced pain scores 30 min after the administration. We concluded that pain reduction by interpleural instillation of bupivacaine reflects a placebo-like effect; however, interpleural analgesia is not effective in patients undergoing lateral thoracotomy. Sex and surgical approach were shown to influence postoperative pain intensity at rest, but not during coughing. The female patients, and those undergoing posterolateral thoracotomy, exhibited higher pain scores. This observation appears to be of only marginal clinical significance. The efficacy of interpleural analgesia to reduce postoperative pain intensity in patients after lateral thoracotomy is controversial. In this study we demonstrated a lack of efficacy of interpleural analgesia. IMPLICATIONS: The efficacy of interpleural analgesia to reduce postoperative pain intensity in patients after lateral thoracotomy is controversial. In this study, we demonstrated a lack of efficacy of interpleural analgesia.