阿德福韦酯联合拉米夫定治疗代偿期乙型肝炎肝硬化疗效观察

目的 观察阿德福韦酯联合拉米夫定及拉米夫定单用治疗代偿期乙型肝炎肝硬化的疗效和安全性.方法 62例患者在保肝、对症支持等综合治疗的基础上分为A、B两组.A组(32例)每13口服阿德福韦酯10 mg和拉米夫定100 mg联合治疗,B组(30例)每日仅口服拉米夫定100 mg,疗程均为48周.观察患者治疗前后临床表现、生化学指标、病毒学及肝纤维化指标改变情况及不良反应.结果 62例患者治疗后病情稳定,肝功能恢复正常;A组HBV-DNA<103cp/ml者占62.5%,HBeAg阴转率达37.5%,病毒耐药突破率仅为3.1%(1例),B组HBV-DNA<10 3cp/ml者占53.3%,HBeAg阴转率为23.3%,病毒耐药突破率为16.6%(5例);两组血清透明质酸酶、Ⅲ型前胶原、层粘连蛋白、Ⅳ型胶原治疗后均明显降低(P<0.01),无明显不良反应出现.结论 阿德福韦酯联合拉米夫定治疗代偿期乙型肝炎肝硬化,可迅速抑制HBV-DNA的复制,促进肝功能恢复,病毒突破率低,安全性好.     

拉米夫定与阿德福韦酯联合治疗失代偿期乙型肝炎肝硬化患者临床疗效研究

目的 探讨拉米夫定与阿德福韦酯后续或初始联合治疗失代偿期乙型肝炎肝硬化患者的疗效差异。方法 2014年5月~2016年5月收治的失代偿期乙型肝炎肝硬化患者100例,分为A组50例和B组50例,分别给予拉米夫定治疗24 w后再联合阿德福韦酯或初始即两药联合治疗,比较治疗48 w末两组血清HBVDNA转阴和ALT复常情况。结果 B组患者Child-Pugh评分、血清ALT、TBIL和ALB水平分别为（7.6±0.6）分,（65.8±10.1）U/L,（25.4±5.6）μmol/L和（32.3±0.8）g/L,与A组的（8.9±0.8）分,（87.3±21.0）U/L,（27.9±7.4）μmol/L和（32.3±0.6）g/L比,除了血清ALT水平明显低于A组(P<0.05)外,均无显著差异（P<0.05）;B组门静脉内径、脾静脉内径和脾厚度分别为（12.7±0.7）mm、（7.9±0.6）mm和（45.4±6.5）mm,与A组的（12.2±0.9）mm、（7.6±1.0）mm和（45.7±7.4）mm比,无显著差异（P<0.05）;B组血清HBVDNA转阴率和ALT复常率分别为90.0%和88.0%,均显著高于A组的54.0%和60.0%（P<0.05）。结论 相对于后续加用阿德福韦酯,初始联合拉米夫定和阿德福韦酯治疗失代偿期乙型肝炎肝硬化患者,可能提高血清HBV DNA阴转率和血清ALT复常率。     

乙型肝炎肝硬化失代偿期初始拉米夫定和阿德福韦酯联合抗病毒治疗的疗效观察

目的研究拉米夫定（LAM）初始联合阿德福韦酯（ADV）治疗乙型肝炎肝硬化失代偿期患者的疗效与安全性。方法30例HBeAg阳性乙型肝炎肝硬化失代偿期患者,分为LAM初始联合ADV治疗组和变异后联合组,疗程均为48周。结果初始联合组与变异后联合组患者ALT与TBil在治疗4、12、24与48周均较基线明显好转（P〈0．05）,治疗4、12周后,两组均无HBVDNA转阴的患者,治疗24周后,分别有4例（40％）初始联合组与4例（20％）变异后联合组患者HBVDNA转阴,但差异无统计学意义。治疗48周后,初始联合组与变异后联合组HBVDNA转阴率分别为90％（9／10）与40％（8／20）,HBeAg／抗-HBe血清转换率分别为60％（6／10）与20％（4／20）,两组间差异均具有统计学意义（P〈0．05）。初始联合组患者Child—Pugh评分在48周时,优于变异后联合组（P〈0．05）。结论ADV初始联合LAM治疗在改善乙型肝炎肝硬化失代偿期患者临床状况及抗病毒方面均明显优于变异后联合治疗。     

阿德福韦酯联合拉米夫定对YMDD变异的失代偿期乙型肝炎肝硬化临床观察

目的观察比较阿德福韦酯联合拉米夫定和单用阿德福韦酯治疗YMDD变异的失代偿期乙型肝炎肝硬化的疗效和安全性。方法将30例在拉米夫定治疗过程中出现YMDD变异的失代偿期乙型肝炎肝硬化患者随机分为两组(各15例),联合组:继续接受拉米夫定100mg/d治疗,全程联合阿德福韦酯10mg/d口服;单用组:拉米夫定100mg/d和阿德福韦酯10mg/d联合治疗3月后单用阿德福韦酯10mg/d口服,疗程1年以上,两组在保肝基础治疗上无差异。结果治疗48周时结果显示,联合组肝功能ALT、ALB改善优于单用组(t分别为3.30、4.06,P<0.01),HBV DNA阴转率显著高于单用组(x2=3.89,P<0.05)。结论阿德福韦酯对YMDD变异的失代偿期乙型肝炎肝硬化患者有良好的疗效和安全性,联合拉米夫定疗效更显著,能明显提高患者的生存质量,改善预后。     

阿德福韦酯联合拉米夫定治疗失代偿性乙型肝炎肝硬化疗效观察

我院自2001年后试用拉米夫定治疗活动性、失代偿性乙型肝炎肝硬化并取得较好疗效,当部分患者出现YMDD变异产生耐药,改用阿德福韦酯口服治疗后,部分患者又发生阿德福韦酯耐药,引起病毒反弹及生化指标反弹。本组此类患者采用阿德福韦酯重新联用拉米夫定治疗取得很好疗效,报道如下：     

阿德福韦酯和拉米夫定治疗乙型肝炎肝硬化失代偿期的临床观察

目的观察阿德福韦酯和拉米夫定治疗肝炎肝硬化失代偿期患者48周的疗效和不良反应。方法采用随机分组法,将62例肝炎肝硬化失代偿期患者,随机分为阿德福韦酯组32例,给予阿德福韦酯10mg/d,拉米夫定组30例,给予拉米夫定100mg/d,疗程均为48周。均给予常规护肝及支持、对症治疗。观察两组患者的肝功能、HBeAg、HBV DNA、肝纤维化标志物Ⅲ型前胶原、Ⅳ型胶原、层黏连蛋白、透明质酸、肾功能及Child-Pugh分级、药物不良反应。结果两组患者肝功能各项指标的复常率、血清HBV DNA下降水平及转阴率、HBeAg转阴率及HBeAg/抗-HBe转换率均随着治疗疗程的延长而增加,但两组比较,差异无统计学意义。治疗至48周时拉米夫定组有2例发生YMDD变异,变异率6.7%,阿德福韦酯组无病毒变异发生。两组患者血清肝纤维化标志物治疗至24周时与治疗前相比明显下降,且随着疗程的延长进一步降低,两组比较差异无统计学意义。两组患者治疗前后Child-Pugh分级比较,差异无统计学意义。两组患者均未发现药物相关的肾功能损害,两组中各有2例患者出现轻度不良反应,但均能耐受。结论肝炎肝硬化失代偿期患者48周的抗病毒治疗,阿德福韦酯的疗效与安全性均与拉米夫定相似,而病毒耐药突变率较拉米夫定低。     

拉米夫定和阿德福韦酯联合治疗乙型肝炎肝硬化患者疗效分析

目的 分析拉米夫定和阿德福韦酯联合治疗乙型肝炎肝硬化患者的疗效。方法 2012年1月~2014年12月我院消化科诊治的136例乙型肝炎肝硬化患者,将其分为两组,给予对照组常规护肝治疗,给予观察组拉米夫定和阿德福韦酯联合治疗。采用RT-PCR法检测血清HBV DNA水平,使用全自动生化分析仪检测血生化指标,使用全自动血细胞分析仪检测血常规,使用C3510凝血分析仪检测凝血功能指标。结果 在治疗6个月,观察组血清HBV DNA水平为（2.2±0.6）lg copies/ml,显著低于对照组（P>0.05）;血清总胆红素水平和凝血酶原时间国际标准化比值分别为（32.9±5.7）μmol/L和（1.3±0.1）,均显著低于对照组的【（45.9±6.2）μmol/L和（1.5±0.1）,P<0.05】;血清白蛋白水平为（38.7±3.8）g/L,显著高于对照组的【（33.6±3.5）g/L,P<0.05】;血小板计数为（98.1±3.4）×10⁹/L,显著高于对照组的（87.4±3.2）×10⁹/L（P<0.05）;观察1年,观察组出现2例（2.9%）自发性细菌性腹膜炎,2例（2.9%）上消化道出血,对照组出现4例（5.9%）腹膜炎,6例（8.8%）消化道出血和4例（2.9%）肝性脑病。结论 应用拉米夫定和阿德福韦酯联合治疗乙型肝炎肝硬化患者有较好的近期疗效。     

拉米夫定和阿德福韦酯初始联合与拉米夫定优化治疗慢性乙型肝炎疗效对比

目的观察应用拉米夫定和阿德福韦酯初始联合与拉米夫定优化治疗慢性乙型肝炎患者的临床疗效。方法将80例慢性乙型肝炎患者随机分为优化治疗组和联合治疗组。优化治疗组给予拉米夫定单药治疗24周后,对HBV DNA未转阴的患者加用阿德福韦酯继续治疗;联合治疗组给予拉米夫定和阿德福韦酯初始联合治疗,观察两组治疗24周和48周时的疗效。结果在治疗24周后,联合治疗组HBV DNA阴转率为82.5%,显著高于单药组的60%(P<0.05),两组患者HBeAg血清转换率和ALT复常率相比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);在治疗48周后,两组患者HBV DNA阴转率、HBeAg血清转换率和ALT复常率相比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论根据CHB患者基线HBV DNA水平选择适合的抗病毒治疗方案可优化治疗方案。     

阿德福韦酯治疗YMDD变异的失代偿期乙型肝炎肝硬化临床观察

目的观察阿德福韦酯治疗拉米夫定治疗过程中出现YMDD变异的失代偿期乙型肝炎肝硬化的疗效和安全性。方法将28例在拉米夫定治疗过程中出现YMDD变异的失代偿期乙型肝炎肝硬化患者随机分为治疗组15例和对照组13例,两组均在保肝、利胆等常规内科综合治疗基础上继续接受拉米夫定100mg/d口服治疗,治疗组在上述基础上联合阿德福韦酯10mg/d口服,疗程1年。结果对照组1例因出现肝细胞癌死亡,2例因并发上消化道大出血死亡。治疗组1例在治疗一周时因出现血肌酐轻度升高退出。治疗1年时结果显示,治疗组肝功能恢复情况及HBVDNA阴转率均优于对照组(P<0.01),治疗组病死率为0%,对照组为23.08%。结论阿德福韦酯治疗YMDD变异的失代偿期乙型肝炎肝硬化患者有良好的疗效和安全性,能提高患者的生存质量,改善预后。     

拉米夫定联合阿德福韦酯治疗失代偿期乙型肝炎肝硬化的临床观察

目的研究拉米夫定（LAM）联合阿德福韦酯（ADV）治疗失代偿期乙型肝炎肝硬化的临床疗效。方法92例失代偿期乙型肝炎肝硬化患者在综合护肝及对症治疗基础上,联合组30例给予拉米夫定100mg/d和阿德福韦酯10mg/d口服;LAM组28例给予拉米夫定100mg/d口服;34例给予阿德福韦酯10mg/d口服。在治疗前和治疗6个月时观察肝功能、HBVM以及血清HBVDNA水平的变化。结果拉米夫定和阿德福韦酯联合组与拉米夫定组和阿德福韦酯组HBVDNA阴转率分别为80%、53.6%和41.2%,联合组明显优于单用组（P〈0.05）;肝功能Child-Pugh计分分别为7.0±1.1、7.7±1.2和7.8±1.3,联合组明显优于单用组（P〈0.05）。结论拉米夫定联合阿德福韦酯抗病毒治疗失代偿期乙型肝炎肝硬化优于单用拉米夫定或阿德福韦酯治疗。     

拉米夫定单药及其初始联合阿德福韦酯治疗失代偿期乙型肝炎肝硬化的疗效比较

目的 比较拉米夫定与阿德福韦酯初始联合或拉米夫定单药治疗失代偿期乙型肝炎肝硬化患者2年的疗效.方法 60例失代偿期乙型肝炎肝硬化接受初始拉米夫定(LAM)与阿德福韦酯(ADV)联合抗病毒治疗,为初始联合组;55例接受拉米夫定(LAM)单药抗病毒治疗,为LAM单药组每1～3个月检测患者肝功能、肾功能、甲胎蛋白、乙型肝炎病毒标志物、血清HBV DNA、凝血酶原时间(PT)、肝脏的超声或CT检查,分别在治疗12个月和24个月时比较疗效.组间均数比较用Mann-Whitney检验,相关性分析时采用Pearson双侧t检验.结果 初始联合组45例治疗12个月时血清HBV DNA阴转率为51.1%(23/45),而40例LAM单药组HBV DNA阴转率为47.5%(19/40);至24个月时,初始联合组HBV DNA阴转率达86.7%(39/45),LAM单药组为60.0%(24/40),两组间差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05).初始联合组治疗24个月时,HBeAg血清学转换率为43.5%(10/23),LAM单药组HBeAg血清学转换率为30.0%(6/20),两组间差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05).ALT复常率在初始联合组治疗12个月时为71.1%(32/45),LAM单药组为65.0%(26/40),至24个月时两组ALT复常率分别为88.9%(40/45)和75.0%(30/40),差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05).初始联合组在治疗12个月和24个月时,分别有4.4%(2/45)和6.7%(3/45)发生病毒学突破,但均未检测到病毒学变异,LAM单药组在12个月和24个月时分别有22.5%(9/40)和37.5%(15/40)发生病毒学突破,并分别有17.5%(7/40)和32.5%(13/40)的患者中检测到病毒学变异,均较联合治疗组高(P＜0.05).初始联合治疗更能改善肝功能,Child-Turcotte-Pugh评分和终末期肝病模型评分亦有更明显下降.随访24个月,LAM和ADV初始联合治疗组累计死亡或肝移植率为16.7%,LAM单药组累计死亡或肝移植发生率为20.0%.两组均未发现有血清肌酐超过正常值上限的病例.结论 LAM与ADV初始联合治疗失代偿期乙型肝炎肝硬化患者能更明显抑制HBV复制,改善肝功能各项指标,降低病死率,值得临床应用.

Abstract：

Objective To compare the efficacy of Lamivudine (LAM) monotherapy and combination therapy with Adefovir Dipivoxil (ADV) for patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV) -related decompensated cirrhosis for 2 years.Methods A total of 115 patients with HBV-related decompensated cirrhosis were erolled in this study,among 60 patients were treated with LAM combined with ADV and 55 were treated with LAM.The liver and kidney functions,HBV DNA,HBV-M,AFP,Ultrasond or CT scan of liver were tested every l-3months.the treatment efficacy was evaluated by month 12 and 24.Results By month 12,the HBVDNA negative rates of combination therapy group and LAM monotherapy group were 51.1% (45 cases) and 47.5% (40 cases) respectively,by month 24 the rates were 86.7% and 60.0% respectively.By month 24 the HBeAg negative rates of combination therapy group and LAM monotherapy group were 43.5% and 30.0%respectively,with significant difference existed between the two therapy groups (P ＜ 0.05).By month 24,the ALT normalization rates of the two groups were 88.9% and 72.5% respectively.Viral breakthrough happened in 2 cases (4.4%) by month 12 and 3 cases (6.7%) by month 24 in LAM and ADV combination group,but no viral resistance observed.Viral breakthrough happened in 9 cases (22.5%) by month 12 and 15 cases (37.5%)by month 24 in LAM monotherapy group with viral resistance observed in 7 cases (17.5%) by month 12 and 13 cases (32.5) by month 24.Significant difference existed between the two groups (P ＜ 0.05).Improvement of liver function was more obviously in the combination group.The accumulative total mortality or liver transplantation rate were 16.7% and 20.0% respectively in combination therapy group and LAM monotheapy group.No renal dysfunction observed in both groups.Conclusion LAM combined with ADV is better choice for patients with HBV-related decompensated cirrhosis as compared to LAM monotherapy.     

阿德福韦酯联合拉米夫定治疗乙肝肝硬化的临床效果观察

目的观察阿德福韦酯联合拉米夫定治疗乙肝肝硬化的临床效果。方法将我院收治的240例乙肝肝硬化患者随机分为观察组120例和对照组120例。入院后对照组患者在常规治疗的基础上行单纯的拉米夫定治疗,观察组患者在常规治疗的基础上行阿德福韦酯联合拉米夫定治疗。分别检测两组患者治疗前后的肝功能指标水平及肝脏Child-Pugh评分,血清学指标以及不良反应的发生率。结果治疗后,观察组患者肝功能指标TBIL、ALT、AST及Child-Pugh平均水平明显低于对照组(P0.01)。观察组患者治疗后HBV DNA、HBeAg转阴率及HBeAg/抗-HBeAb血清转换率均高于对照组(P0.01)。治疗后,观察组患者不良反应总发生率为13.33%,对照组为12.5%,两组比较,差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。结论阿德福韦酯联合拉米夫定治疗乙肝肝硬化的临床效果明显优于单纯拉米夫定治疗,能有效增加抗病毒效果,改善患者肝功能,且不良反应少,值得临床推广与应用。     

拉米夫定、阿德福韦酯联合扶正化瘀胶囊治疗乙肝后肝硬化失代偿期的2年疗效观察

目的观察拉米夫定、阿德福韦酯联合扶正化瘀胶囊对于乙肝后肝硬化失代偿期治疗作用。方法将51例乙肝后肝硬化失代偿期患者随机分为两组。对照组(n=21)用常规西药治疗方法,如维生素类和护肝降酶治疗,必要时用人血白蛋白等;治疗组(n=30)给予拉米夫定、阿德福韦酯联合扶正化瘀胶囊,疗程均为2年。观察治疗前后HBV-DNA载量,Child-Pugh评分,透明质酸(HA)、Ⅲ型前胶原肽(PcⅢ)、Ⅳ型胶原(Ⅳ-C)和层黏蛋白(LN)等血清肝纤维化指标,彩色多普勒检查肝脾形态、门静脉内径(Dpv)、脾静脉内径(Dsv)和脾厚度(st)。结果基线时两组以上观察指标均无统计学差异(P>0.05)。治疗结束时,对照组3例死亡(肝癌1例、上消化道出血2例),自身前后对比疗效改善不明显((P>0.05)。治疗组死亡1例(交通意外),自身前后对比观察指标改善优于对照组(P<0.05)。结论拉米夫定、阿德福韦酯联合扶正化瘀胶囊有明显改善乙肝后肝硬化失代偿期Child-Pugh评分作用和肝脾形态,降低HBV DNA水平。     

Efficacy of combined therapy in patients with hepatitis B virus-related decompensated cirrhosis

AIM: To investigate the efficacy and safety of combined de novo lamivudine (LAM) and adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) therapy in hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related decompensated liver cirrhosis patients. METHODS: One hundred and forty patients with HBVrelated decompensated cirrhosis were recruited, 70 patients were treated with combined LAM and ADV de novo therapy, and the other 70 patients were treated with LAM alone as controls. The follow-up period was 144 wk. All patients with LAM resistance were shifted to ADV. RESULTS: The percentage of HBV-related decompensated cirrhosis patients with undetectable HBV DNA inde novo combination group was 51.6% (33/64), 84.2% (48/57), and 92.3% (49/53) by weeks 48, 96, and 144, respectively. In monotherapy group, HBV DNA negativity rate was 46.1% (30/65), 56.1% (32/57), and 39.2% (20/51) by weeks 48, 96 and 144, respectively. There was a significant difference between the two groups by weeks 96 and 144 (P = 0.012 and 0.001). The hepatitis B e antigen seroconversion rate was 28.1% (9/32), 40.0% (12/30), and 53.6% (15/28) in the combination group by weeks 48, 96 and 144, respectively, and 24.2% (8/33), 31.0% (9/29), and 37.0% (10/27) by weeks 48, 96 and 144, respectively, in monotherapy group. A total of 68.6% (44/64), 84.2% (48/57), and 92.5% (49/53) patients achieved alanine aminotransferase (ALT) normalization by weeks 48, 96 and 144, respectively in the combination group. In monotherpy group, the ALT normalization rate was 64.6% (42/65) by week 48, 73.7% (42/57) by week 96, and 80.4% (41/51) by week 144. No patients in the combination group exhibited detectable resistance for at least 144 wk. The cumulative resistance rate in monotherapy group at weeks 48, 96, and 144 was 20.0%, 36.8%, and 56.9%. Both combination group and monotherapy group demonstrated an improvement in Child-Turcotte Pugh and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease scores at weeks 48, 96, and 144. All patients tolerated both combination and monotherapy. The ceratinine levels and glomerular filtration rate remained norma     

De novo combined lamivudine and adefovir dipivoxil therapy vs entecavir monotherapy for hepatitis B virus-related decompensated cirrhosis

AIM:To compare efficacy of combined lamivudine(LAM)and adefovir dipivoxil(ADV)therapy with that of entecavir(ETV)monotherapy for hepatitis B virus(HBV)-related decompensated liver cirrhosis.METHODS:A total of 120 na ve patients with HBVrelated decompensated cirrhosis participated in this study.Sixty patients were treated with combined LAM and ADV therapy(LAM+ADV group),while the other60 were treated with ETV monotherapy(ETV group)for two years.Tests for liver and kidney function,alpha-fetoprotein,HBV serum markers,HBV DNA load,prothrombin time(PT),and ultrasonography or computed tomography scan of the liver were performed every1 to 3 mo.Repeated measure ANOVA and theχ2test were performed to compare the efficacy,side effects,and the cumulative survival rates at 48 and 96 wk.RESULTS:Forty-five patients in each group were observed for 96 wk.No significant differences in HBV DNA negative rates and alanine aminotransferase(ALT)normalization rates at weeks 48(χ2=2.12 and 2.88)and96(χ2=3.21 and 3.24)between the two groups were observed.Hepatitis B e antigen seroconversion rate in the LAM+ADV group at week 96 was significantly higher in the ETV group(43.5%vs 36.4%,χ2=4.09,P<0.05).Viral breakthrough occurred in 2 cases(4.4%)by week 48 and in 3 cases(6.7%)by week 96 in the LAM+ADV group,and no viral mutation was detected.In the ETV group,viral breakthrough occurred in 1 case(2.2%)at the end of week 96.An increase in albumin(F=18.9 and 17.3),decrease in total bilirubin and in ALT(F=16.5,17.1 and 23.7,24.8),reduced PT(F=22.7 and 24.5),and improved Child-Turcotte-Pugh and the model for end-stage liver disease scores(F=18.5,17.8,and 24.2,23.8)were observed in both groups.The cumulative rates of mortality and liver transplantation were 16.7%(10/60)and 18.3%(11/60)in the LAM+ADV and ETV groups,respectively.CONCLUSION:Both LAM+ADV combination therapy and ETV monotherapy can effectively inhibit HBV replication,improve liver function,and decrease mortality.     

De novo combination therapy with lamivudine and adefovir dipivoxil in chronic hepatitis B patients

AIM: To investigate the appropriate time for combination therapy in HBeAg positive chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients with decompensated cirrhosis.METHODS: Thirty HBeAg positive CHB patients with decompensated cirrhosis were enrolled in the study. All of the patients were given 48 wk combination therapy with lamivudine (LAM) and adefovir dipivoxil (ADV). Briefly, 10 patients were given the de novo combination therapy with LAM and ADV, whereas the other 20 patients received ADV in addition to LAM after hepatitis B virus (HBV) genetic mutation.RESULTS: Serum alanine aminotransferase and total bilirubin were both improved in the two groups at 4, 12, 24 and 48 wk after treatment. Serum albumin was also improved at 24 and 48 wk after combination therapy in both groups. The serum HBV DNA level was still detectable in every patient in the two groups at 4 and 12 wk after combination treatment. However, in the de novo combination group, serum HBV DNA levels in 4 (40%) and 9 (90%) patients was decreased to below 1×10³ copies/mL at 24 and 48 wk after the combination treatment, respectively. In parallel, serum HBV DNA levels in 2 (20%) and 8 (40%) patients in the add-on combination group became undetectable at 24 and 48 wk after combination treatment, respectively. Furthermore, 6 (60%) patients in the de novo combination group achieved HBeAg seroconversion after 48 wk treatment, whereas only 4 (20%) patients in the add-on combination group achieved seroconversion. Child-Pugh score of patients in the de novo combination group was better than that of patients in the add-on combination group after 48 wk treatment. Moreover, patients in the de novo combination group had a significantly decreased serum creatinine level and elevated red blood cell counts.CONCLUSION: De novo combination therapy with LAM and ADV was better than add-on combination therapy in terms of Child-Pugh score, virus inhibition and renal function.     

拉米夫定联合阿德福韦酯治疗活动性乙型肝炎肝硬化

目的观察拉米夫定联合阿德福韦酯治疗活动性乙型肝炎肝硬化的临床疗效及安全性和耐药性。方法 48例患者给予拉米夫定联合阿德福韦酯治疗,另48例单用拉米夫定治疗。连续观察96周。结果联合治疗组和对照组96周病死率分别为10.41%（5/48）和22.91%（11/48,P〈0.05）;治疗组在治疗48周、96周后,生化指标改善优于对照组;治疗组Child-Pugh评分比对照组改善明显（P〈0.05）;两组患者并发症发生率有显著性差异（P〈0.05）;治疗组患者HBV DNA转阴率比对照组显著性提高（P〈0.01）;治疗组96周未见耐药发生,而对照组48周和96周有10例和12例发生耐药。结论拉米夫定联合阿德福韦治疗能改善活动性乙型肝炎肝硬化患者肝功能和提高生存率,降低耐药率。     

拉米夫定和阿德福韦酯初始联合及脐血干细胞治疗失代偿期肝硬化临床研究

目的探讨脐带血干细胞输注及拉米夫定（LAM）、阿德福韦酯（ADV）初始联合治疗失代偿期乙型肝炎肝硬化的临床效果。方法选择失代偿期乙型肝炎肝硬化患者56例,给予ADV10mg／d和LAM100mg／d口服,脐带血干细胞细胞悬液[含单个核细胞（15-35）×10^9／t]100ml静脉输注,每周1次,连续3次。治疗后将患者血常规、肝功能（ALT、AST、ALB、TBil、DBil）、病毒血清学指标进行比较。结果56例患者的肝功能（如ALT、AST、TB、ALB）等血清学指标,治疗前后差异有统计学意义（P〈0．05）,血常规（如WBC、PLT等）、HBVDNA载量比较差异有统计学意义（P〈0．05）。结论脐带血干细胞输注及LAM、ADV初始联合治疗失代偿期乙型肝炎肝硬化可迅速显著地抑制HBVDNA的复制,降低病毒载量,有效减轻肝脏的炎性反应,减少肝细胞坏死损伤,促进肝细胞再生,加速肝功能恢复。