A comparative trial of granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor and dexamethasone, separately and in combination, for the mobilization of neutrophils in the peripheral blood of normal volunteers

BACKGROUND: The clinical utility of polymorphonuclear neutrophil (PMN) transfusion therapy has been compromised, in part, by the inability to obtain sufficient quantities of functional neutrophils from donors. To define the optimal conditions for mobilization of PMNs in granulocyte donors, the effects of granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and dexamethasone, separately and in combination, on PMN counts in normal volunteers were compared. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Five normal subjects were randomly assigned to each of the following single-dose regimens in 5 consecutive weeks: 1) G-CSF, 300 micrograms given subcutaneously; 2) G-CSF, 600 micrograms subcutaneously: 3) dexamethasone, 8 mg given orally; 4) G-CSF, 300 micrograms subcutaneously, plus dexamethasone, 8 mg orally; and 5) G-CSF, 600 micrograms subcutaneously, plus dexamethasone 8 mg orally. Venous blood was collected at 0, 6, 12, and 24 hours after drug administration for the determination of absolute neutrophil counts (ANCs). RESULTS: Maximal ANC was achieved at 12 hours after each regimen, except dexamethasone alone (maximum, 24 hours). Dexamethasone significantly increased the maximal ANC induced by either dose of G-CSF alone (p < 0.05). The greatest mobilization of PMNs occurred after the administration of G-CSF (600 micrograms) and dexamethasone (8 mg); the ANC increased from a mean baseline value of 3,594 per microL to 43,017 per microL at 12 hours. All of the drug regimens were well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Dexamethasone significantly increases the level of neutrophilia induced in normal subjects by G-CSF. The combination of dexamethasone and G-CSF (at the dosages used in this study) is a convenient, well-tolerated regimen for the mobilization of PMNs in the peripheral blood of granulocyte donors. Moreover, the optimal quantitative yield of PMNs is likely to be achieved by leukapheresis 12 hours after drug administration.     

Combined administration of G-CSF and dexamethasone for the mobilization of granulocytes in normal donors: optimization of dosing

BACKGROUND: The clinical utility of neutrophil (polymorphonuclear leukocyte, PMN) transfusion therapy has been compromised, in part, by the inability to obtain sufficient quantities of functional neutrophils from donors. Mobilization of PMNs in the peripheral blood of normal volunteers has been shown to be superior when G-CSF is administered in conjunction with dexamethasone to that when either agent is administered alone. The current study was conducted to determine the optimal dosages of G-CSF and dexamethasone to be administered to donors in a granulocyte transfusion program. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Five normal subjects were randomly assigned to each of the following single-dose regimens over five consecutive weeks: 1) subcutaneous (SC) G-CSF at 600 microg and oral (PO) dexamethasone at 8 mg; 2) SC G-CSF at 450 microg and PO dexamethasone at 8 mg; 3) SC G-CSF at 450 microg and PO dexamethasone at 12 mg; 4) SC G-CSF at 450 microg; and 5) PO dexamethasone at 12 mg. Venous blood was collected at 0, 6, 12, and 24 hours after drug administration for determination of absolute neutrophil count (ANC). Side effects of drug administration were recorded by using a standardized symptom questionnaire. RESULTS: Maximal ANC was achieved at 12 hours after administration of drugs under each regimen. All four regimens containing G-CSF caused greater than 10-fold increases in the ANC. When administered in conjunction with dexamethasone, G-CSF resulted in statistically similar PMN mobilization at dosages of 450 microg and 600 microg. The combined single-dose regimen of SC G-CSF at 450 microg and PO dexamethasone at 8 mg increased the mean ANC from a baseline value of 2800 per microL to 37,900 per microL at 12 hours after administration. This regimen was well tolerated by the normal volunteers. CONCLUSION: In a single-dose format designed for clinical granulocyte transfusion programs, optimal PMN mobilization can be achieved in normal donors with a combined regimen of SC G-CSF at 450 microg, and PO dexamethasone at 8 microg.     

Rapid down modulation of P-selectin glycoprotein ligand-1 (PSGL-1, CD162) by G-CSF in humans

BACKGROUND: In vitro and animal studies suggest a critical role for P-selectin glycoprotein ligand-1 (PSGL-1) in the regulation of WBC adhesion and neutrophil counts. As WBC activation decreases PSGL-1 expression on WBCs in vitro, the effects of G-CSF on PSGL-1 expression were examined. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Two different G-CSF doses (1 and 5 microg/kg IV) were compared with high-dose dexamethasone (1 mg/kg twice daily) and placebo in a randomized, double-blind, four-way cross-over trial in eight healthy volunteers. Surface expression of WBC adhesion molecules was quantified by flow cytometry. RESULTS: Both G-CSF and dexamethasone led to a delayed down regulation of L-selectin. In contrast, G-CSF rapidly down regulated PSGL-1 expression on neutrophils within 90 minutes, whereas neither dexamethasone nor placebo had an effect. Similarly, incubation of WBCs with clinically relevant G-CSF concentrations (60 microg/L) for 90 minutes down modulated PSGL-1 expression on neutrophils and enhanced CD11b expression, compatible with a direct PSGL-1 down regulation by G-CSF-induced neutrophil activation. Similar to G-CSF, GM-CSF down regulated PSGL-1 in vitro. Both drugs induced shedding of soluble PSGL-1, supporting the concept that proteolytic cleavage is a potential mechanism of PSGL-1 down regulation on neutrophils. CONCLUSION: G-CSF, but not dexamethasone, down regulates PSGL-1 expression on the surface of neutrophils in humans. This could also partly explain the synergistic effects when both drugs are combined for optimal mobilization of neutrophils for clinical granulocyte transfusion programs.     

A dose-response analysis of lenograstim plus dexamethasone for neutrophil mobilization and collection

BACKGROUND: The objective was to evaluate the dose-response relationship of lenograstim plus dexamethasone for neutrophil mobilization and collection. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: In a prospective study, 260 healthy volunteers received oral dexamethasone (8 mg) plus a single subcutaneous injection of glycosylated granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF; lenograstim) at medians of 1.5 (1.0-2.3) microg per kg (n = 43), 3 (2.4-4.1) microg per kg (n = 73), 6 (4.3-7.9) microg per kg (n = 123), and 12 (8.2-17.2) microg per kg (n = 21) and underwent neutrophil collections with a polymorphonucleated neutrophil (PMN) program. White blood cell (WBC) counts and PMN mobilization and collection results were compared, and the severity and clinical significance of donor adverse reactions were evaluated. Fifty-two neutropenic patients (29 children, 23 adults) underwent 271 neutrophil transfusions (GTXs) every other day to maintain WBC levels continuously above 0.5 x 10(9) per L. RESULTS: Within the dose range 1.5, 3, and 6 microg per kg, each doubling step was associated with a 10 to 15 percent PMN increase in peripheral blood up to 32.8 (19.1-49.2) x 10(9) per L (6 microg/kg; p 相似文献   

Equivalent mobilization and collection of granulocytes for transfusion after administration of glycosylated G-CSF (3 microg/kg) plus dexamethasone versus glycosylated G-CSF (12 microg/kg) alone

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to find a regimen for mobilization and collection of granulocytes that combines low-dose G-CSF administration with satisfactory PMN mobilization and apheresis at a low rate of donor adverse reactions. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: In a prospective study, 52 healthy unrelated volunteers received a single subcutaneous injection of glycosylated G-CSF (Lenograstim Chugai-Pharma, Frankfurt, Germany) at medians of 3.1 (range, 2.4-3.6) microg per kg plus dexamethasone (8 mg orally; n = 29) or at 11.8 (7.1-18.5) microg of lenograstim per kg (p < or = 0.0001) without dexamethasone (n = 23) and underwent standard apheresis using the PMN program of a cell separator (Spectra, COBE [now Gambro] BCT). WBC and PMN mobilization results and apheresis yields were compared and the severity and clinical significance of donor adverse reactions was evaluated. RESULTS: For the low-dose G-CSF plus dexamethasone versus the high-dose G-CSF alone group, similar mobilization results were observed for WBCs with 31.3 (19.1-44.9) x 10(9) per L versus 27.5 (19.2-44.0) x 10(9) per L (p = 0.21, NS) and PMNs with 29.0 (17.6-42.2) x 10(9) per L versus 25.2 (16.2-39.0) x 10(9) per L (p = 0.08, NS). The PMN apheresis yields were equal with 70 (39-139) x 10(9) per unit with low-dose G-CSF versus 68 (33-120) x 10(9) per unit in the high-dose G-CSF group (p = 0.83, NS). Regarding donor adverse reactions, 7 out of 29 (24%) and 8 out of 23 donors (35%) reported moderate or severe symptoms. The character of these reactions was different; symptoms of greater clinical significance and a higher need for analgesics were observed in the high-dose G-CSF group. CONCLUSIONS: A Lenograstim dose of 3 microg per kg plus DXM assures effective PMN mobilization and acceptable apheresis components. The combination of glycosylated G-CSF with DXM allows a significant dose reduction in G-CSF for PMN mobilization and collection as compared with higher G-CSF doses alone. In the high-dose G-CSF mobilization group, adverse reactions were more severe and required more analgesics.     

Administration of G--CSF plus dexamethasone produces greater granulocyte concentrate yields while causing no more donor toxicity than G--CSF alone

BACKGROUND: G-CSF with or without dexamethasone is becoming the standard agent for mobilizing granulocytes for transfusion. The purpose of this study was to determine if the toxicities of G--CSF with or without dexamethasone are offset by greater collection yields and to define the minimum interval that should separate sequential collections. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Twenty donors were studied on three occasions. They were given either dexamethasone (8 mg, by mouth) plus a placebo injection, G--CSF (5 microg/kg, given subcutaneously) plus placebo capsules, or G--CSF plus dexamethasone. Granulocytes were collected by apheresis. A donor symptom survey was administered, and cell counts and blood chemistries were assessed before collection and 1, 2, 7, 14, 21, 28, and 35 days after collection. RESULTS: More granulocytes were collected when G--CSF was given than when dexamethasone was given (41.1 +/- 20.4 x 10(9) vs. 21.0 +/- 10.0 x 10(9); p<0.001), but the use of G--CSF plus dexamethasone produced the greatest yields (67.1 +/- 22.0 x 10(9); p<0.002). When the donors were given dexamethasone alone, 58 percent experienced at least one symptom, compared to 85 percent of those given G--CSF and 75 percent of those given G--CSF plus dexamethasone. In all three regimens, platelet counts fell 19 percent to 24 percent after collection and remained below baseline for 7 to 14 days. Granulocyte counts returned to baseline within 3 to 7 days, but, in all three regimens, a mild granulocytopenia occurred 21 days after collection. With each of the regimens, blood chemistries changed, but the changes were mild and most returned to baseline within 7 days; however, changes in albumin, bilirubin, and AST persisted until 28 days after collection. CONCLUSION: These results support the use of G--CSF plus dexamethasone in granulocyte donors. G--CSF plus dexamethasone resulted in greater granulocyte yields than either agent alone and was associated with donor symptoms and changes in blood cell counts and chemistries similar to those seen with G--CSF alone or dexamethasone alone. Granulocytes can be safely collected a second time after a 7-day interval; however, for regular donors, it may be best to separate collections by 4 weeks.     

Storage of G-CSF-mobilized granulocyte concentrates

BACKGROUND: Current standards limit granulocyte storage to 24 hours. Since G-CSF inhibits granulocyte apoptosis, it may be possible to store G-CSF-mobilized granulocytes for longer periods while maintaining cell viability and function. However, G-CSF mobilization increases the yield of granulocytes several times, and the resulting higher cell concentrations may diminish viability during storage and significant levels of pyrogenic cytokines may be produced. STUDY DESIGN: Ten granulocyte donors were given dexamethasone (8 mg PO), G-CSF (5 microg/kg SQ), or both and on the next day granulocyte concentrates were collected using a blood cell separator. Component cell counts, cell viablilities, pH, and IL-1beta, IL-6, IL-8 and TNF levels were measured at 2 to 4 (2), 20 to 28 (24), and 44 to 52 hours (48 hours). RESULTS: Significantly more granulocytes were collected when donors were given G-CSF (4.2 +/- 2.3 x 10(10)) or G-CSF plus dexamethasone (6.4 +/- 2.5 x 10(10)) compared with that collected with dexamethasone alone (2.2 +/- 1.2 x 10(10)); p = 0.03 and p = 0.002, respectively. Storage had little effect on WBC count. Slight but significant increases in IL-1beta and IL-8 occurred after 24 and 48 hours as compared to the levels at 2 hours' storage. Levels of IL-6 and TNF did not change. The pH dropped significantly with time in granulocytes mobilized with each regimen. Granulocytes mobilized with G-CSF plus dexamethasone were acidic immediately after collection, and pH was below 6.0 after 24 hours. To assess the effect of cell concentrations on pH, serial dilutions were performed on 13 granulocyte concentrates in autologous plasma prior to storage. The pH remained above 7.0 only when dexamethasone-mobilized granulocytes were diluted 1-in-8 and when the G-CSF plus dexamethasone-mobilized granulocytes were diluted 1-in-16. CONCLUSIONS: To optimize storage pH, mobilized granulocyte concentrates require a 1-in-8 to 1-in-16 dilution, which is operationally impractical. Clinical-grade granulocyte preservative solutions are needed to maintain pH during storage.     

Selection of the mobilization regimen in lymphoma patients: A retrospective cohort study

Background and objectivesConsolidation with autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is recommended for patients with recurrent or refractory lymphoma after salvage chemotherapy. Stem cells which will be used in ASCT are provided by mobilization using granulocyte colony stimulation factor (G-CSF) or chemotherapy plus G-CSF. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of various mobilization regimens on the clinical parameters of lymphoma patients.Materials and methodsMobilization interventions of lymphoma patients were analysed retrospectively. The patients were divided into 3 groups according to the mobilization method implemented to collect stem cells before ASCT, (Group 1: Salvage chemotherapy plus G-CSF, Group 2: Cyclophosphamide plus G-CSF, Group 3: G-CSF alone).ResultsAnalysis of CD34⁺ cell counts of the 3 groups revealed a significant difference (p < 0.001). Although the number of CD34⁺ cells collected were different, the neutrophil and platelet engraftment of the 3 groups were similar (p > 0.05). Furthermore, the results were similar in the separate analysis of NHL and HL patients. While the mobilization success rate in group 1 was 97.8 %, it was 90.2 % in group 3. This difference showed a certain trend towards statistical significance (p = 0.074). Patients who received DHAP plus G-CSF had a higher CD34⁺ count, while neutrophil engraftment was shorter than with ESHAP plus G-CSF (p < 0.05).ConclusionAlthough the success rate of mobilization and number of CD34⁺ cell collected were higher in the salvage chemotherapy plus G-CSF than G-CSF alone, G-CSF alone group provided similar neutrophil and thrombocyte engraftment in most lymphoma patients.     

The determinants of granulocyte yield in 1198 granulocyte concentrates collected from unrelated volunteer donors mobilized with dexamethasone and granulocyte–colony-stimulating factor: a 13-year experience

BACKGROUND: The combination of granulocyte–colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF [filgrastim]) and dexamethasone (G-CSF/dex) is an effective granulocyte mobilization regimen, but the variables that affect donor neutrophil response and granulocyte collection yield are not well characterized.
STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A computerized database containing records of 1198 granulocyte collections from 137 unrelated volunteer apheresis donors during a 13-year period was retrospectively analyzed. Donors were categorized by age, sex, and cumulative number of granulocyte donations. Complete blood counts at baseline and after G-CSF/dex stimulation were recorded. The outcome variables include the preprocedure absolute neutrophil count (preANC), which reflects G-CSF/dex stimulation, and the granulocyte product yield per liter processed (BagGranYield/L).
RESULTS: Higher baseline ANC and platelet (PLT) counts were significantly associated with higher preANC while a larger number of prior granulocytapheresis procedures was associated with lower preANC. Total filgrastim dose (used in weight-based dosing) did not significantly impact preANC or the granulocyte yield; weight-based dosing at 5 µg per kg and a uniform 480-µg dose produced equivalent preANC. PreANC and weight were the key determinants of granulocyte yield (BagGranYield/L).
CONCLUSION: Apheresis donors with higher baseline PLT counts and ANCs have higher ANCs after G-CSF/dex stimulation; donor age, weight, and sex do not have a significant impact. A uniform G-CSF dose of 480 µg is as effective as weight-based dosing at 5 µg per kg. Donor ANC monitoring should be considered after serial granulocytapheresis procedures.     

G-CSF的不同方案动员正常供者外周血干细胞的效果比较

为了研究粒细胞集落刺激因子(rhG-CSF)动员的最佳动员方案,对HLA完全相合的非清髓异基因外周造血干细胞移植的供者60例进行回顾性分析。结果显示:供者rhG-CSF10μg/(kg·d)的动员方案组所采集的单个核细胞及CD34+细胞数明显高于供者rhG-CSF5μg/(kg·d)的动员方案组(P<0.05)。供者rhG-CSF10μg/(kg·d)的动员方案在第4天或第5天采集时所获得的单个核细胞及CD34+细胞数无统计学差别。供者不同rhG-CSF动员剂量及采集时间所获得的CD3+、CD4+、CD8+细胞的百分比无统计学差别。结论:供者10μg/(kg·d)的动员效果明显优于供者5μg/(kg·d)的动员效果。供者10μg/(kg·d)的动员方案在第4天或第5天采集时效果无统计学差异,但第4天采集可缩短动员天数,降低费用,因此对供者采用10μg/(kg·d)动员方案时在第4天采集单个核细胞效果更好。     

The dose of granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor after chemopriming treatment does not influence apheresis yield of progenitor cells: a retrospective study of 91 cases

BACKGROUND: The optimal dose of post-chemotherapy granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) administration before peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) collection has not been determined as yet, although 5 microg per kg per day has been recommended as the standard dose. This study retrospectively analyzed the effect of G-CSF dose on peripheral blood CD34+ cell collection from 91 patients with hematologic malignancies. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Various doses of G-CSF were administered after several chemotherapeutic PBPC mobilization regimens. According to the dose of G-CSF administered, patients were assigned to two groups. Group 1 included 46 patients who received a low dose of G-CSF (median, 3.6 [range, 2.8-4.6] microg/kg/day). Group 2 included 45 patients who received a standard G-CSF dose of 6.0 (5.5-8. 1) microg per kg per day. Patients in the two groups were matched for age, diagnosis, previous therapy, and chemotherapeutic PBPC mobilization regimens. RESULTS: No difference was observed in the median number of CD34+ cells harvested from each group.The number of leukapheresis procedures necessary to obtain a minimum of 3 x 10(6) CD34+ cells per kg was the same in both groups, and the percentage of patients who failed to achieve adequate PBPC collections was similar in the two groups. CONCLUSION: The administration of low-dose G-CSF after chemotherapy appears equivalent to administration of the standard dose in achieving satisfactory PBPC collection.This approach could allow significant savings in medical cost. A randomized and prospective study is necessary, however, to assess the validity of these conclusions.     

Peripheral blood progenitor cell collection after epirubicin, paclitaxel, and cisplatin combination chemotherapy using EPO-based cytokine regimens: a randomized comparison of G-CSF and sequential GM-/G-CSF

BACKGROUND: The peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) mobilization capacity of EPO in association with either G-CSF or sequential GM-CSF/G-CSF was compared in a randomized fashion after epirubicin, paclitaxel, and cisplatin (ETP) chemotherapy. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Forty patients with stage IIIB, IIIC, or IV ovarian carcinoma were enrolled in this randomized comparison of mobilizing capacity and myelopoietic effects of G-CSF + EPO and GM-/G-CSF + EPO following the first ETP chemotherapy treatment. After ETP chemotherapy (Day 1), 20 patients received G-CSF 5 microg per kg per day from Day 2 to Day 13 and 20 patients received GM-CSF 5 microg per kg per day from Day 2 to Day 6 followed by G-CSF 5 microg per kg per day from Day 7 to Day 13. EPO (150 IU per kg) was given every other day from Day 2 to Day 13 to all patients in both arms of the study. Apheresis (two blood volumes) was performed during hematologic recovery. RESULTS: The magnitude of CD34+ cell mobilization and the abrogation of patients' myelosuppression were comparable in both study arms; however, GM-/G-CSF + EPO patients had significantly higher CD34+ yields because of a higher CD34+ cell collection efficiency (57.5% for GM-/G-CSF + EPO and 46.3% for G-CSF + EPO patients; p = 0.0009). Identical doses of PBPCs mobilized by GM-/G-CSF + EPO and G-CSF + EPO drove comparable hematopoietic recovery after reinfusion in patients treated with identical high-dose chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: The sequential administration of GM-CSF and G-CSF in combination with EPO is feasible and improves the PBPC collection efficiency after platinum-based intensive polychemotherapy, associating high PBPC mobilization to high collection efficiency during apheresis.     

Evaluation and comparison of three mobilization methods for the collection of granulocytes

BACKGROUND: Cancer chemotherapeutic regimens have become more potent and myeloablative. As a consequence, morbidity and mortality due to opportunistic infections have become a major challenge. The provision of adequate doses of viable granulocytes has thus become an important approach for circumventing the problem. A schedule for collecting therapeutic numbers of cells with minimal donor toxicity has yet to be established. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: An investigation of three mobilization schedules for the collection of granulocytes for transfusion–granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) 5 micrograms per kg daily; G-CSF 5 micrograms per kg every other day, and prednisone 60 mg given orally (20 mg doses at 17 hours, 12 hours, and 2 hours before the collection). RESULTS: A total of 464 apheresis procedures involving 163 healthy donors were analyzed. Prednisone caused a small increase in the white cell (WBC) counts over the collection days, while G-CSF every other day and daily schedules improved WBC counts to 145 and 160 percent, respectively (p = 0.004). Similarly, administration of G-CSF daily and every other day mobilized higher yields of granulocytes over the collection days, compared to the prednisone schedule (170% and 180% vs. 105%; p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Compared with prednisone, higher WBC yields were achieved by G-CSF stimulation; G-CSF given every other day is as effective as daily G-CSF administration for the recruitment of granulocytes, which makes the mobilization procedure more cost- effective.     

Lenograstim with or without dexamethasone for neutrophil mobilization in healthy donors: short-term kinetics of white blood cells and effects of granulocyte apheresis

Objectives : To determine the optimal time schedule for neutrophil collection after single mobilization with glycosylated recombinant granulocyte colony‐stimulating factor (G‐CSF, lenograstim) with or without dexamethasone (DXM). Donors and Methods : In this prospective randomized trial, 26 healthy volunteers were randomly assigned to a single subcutaneous dose of lenograstim 6 μg/kg plus 8‐mg DXM (G‐CSF/DXM, n = 13) or placebo (G‐CSF/placebo, n = 13). Hematological and biochemical parameters were analyzed before and 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 27, 29, 36, 48, 60, 72, and 84 h and 7 and 30 days after mobilization. Six G‐CSF/DXM subjects underwent standard neutrophil apheresis (NA) 12 and 36 h after mobilization. Results : Polymorphonuclear neutrophil (PMN) counts 12 and 21 h after mobilization were 22.7 (16.6?32.8) × 10⁹/L and 22.4 (18.6?30.6) × 10⁹/L for G‐CSF/placebo versus 33.1 (24.2–44.9) × 10⁹/L and 32.5 (17.4–39.6) × 10⁹/L for G‐CSF/DXM. This mobilization plateau was followed by slow normalization at 72–84 h. The six NA subjects had median PMN yields of 62 (47–101) × 10⁹ and 39 (23–42) × 10⁹ per therapeutic unit. After the first apheresis, PMN counts sharply decreased to 21.1 (14.8–26.3) × 10⁹/L and then temporarily recovered to 25.9 (18.9–36.5) × 10⁹/L (P ≤ 0.001) over the next 8 h. Conclusions : Single doses of lenograstim with or without DXM induced a PMN plateau that lasted 9 h (12–21 h after mobilization), with PMN counts suitable for neutrophil collection. Lenograstim plus DXM made it possible to perform NA twice, 12 and 36 h after mobilization. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Successful PBSC mobilization with high-dose G-CSF for patients failing a first round of mobilization.

PBSC are the preferred source of stem cells for autologous transplantation. However, regardless of the mobilization procedure used, 10%-20% of patients fail to collect an adequate number to ensure prompt engraftment. There is as yet no standard mobilization procedure for patients who fail a first mobilization attempt. Here, we describe a highly efficient strategy to obtain an adequate number of stem cells for patients who failed a first mobilization attempt. Seventy-four patients with various hematologic malignancies underwent initial mobilization with various regimens including hematopoietic growth factors with or without chemotherapy. In 72% of patients, > or =2 x 10(6) CD34+ stem cells/kg were collected in the initial mobilization attempt, and patients engrafted in a median of 10 days for neutrophils and 12 days for platelets. Eighteen patients failed to mobilize adequate numbers of stem cells, defined as the inability to collect 0.2 x 10(6) CD34+ stem cells/kg/day in the first 2-3 days. These patients had their apheresis halted. Patients were immediately given G-CSF (32 microg/kg/day) for 4 days as a second attempt at mobilization. Eighty-eight percent of these patients achieved the target of > or =2 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg, with a median duration of apheresis of 5 days (including the first and second mobilizations). The mean CD34+ cells/kg/day increased after administration of high-dose G-CSF from 0.16 after the first mobilization attempt to 0.61 (p = 0.0002) after the second mobilization. All patients engrafted in a median of 11 and 13 days for neutrophils and platelets, respectively. We conclude that patients whose apheresis yield is <0.4 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg after the first two apheresis collections can be successfully mobilized if high-dose G-CSF is administered immediately and continued until achieving > or =2 x 10(6) CD34+ stem cells/kg.     

Impact of the mobilization regimen and the harvesting technique on the granulocyte yield in healthy donors for granulocyte transfusion therapy

BACKGROUND: Granulocyte mobilization and harvesting, the two major phases of granulocyte collection, have not been standardized. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The data on 123 granulocyte collections were retrospectively investigated for the effect of the mobilization regimen and the harvesting technique. After a single subcutaneous dose (600 µg) of granulocyte–colony‐stimulating factor (G‐CSF) with (n = 68) or without (n = 40) 8 mg of orally administered dexamethasone, 108 granulocyte donors underwent granulocyte collections. Moreover, 15 peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) donors who had received 400 µg/m² or 10 µg/kg G‐CSF for 5 days underwent granulocyte collections on the day after the last PBSC collections (PBSC‐GTX donors). Granulocyte harvesting was performed by leukapheresis with (n = 108) or without (n = 15) using high‐molecular‐weight hydroxyethyl starch (HES). RESULTS: Granulocyte donors who received mobilization with G‐CSF plus dexamethasone produced significantly higher granulocyte yields than those who received G‐CSF alone (7.2 × 10¹⁰ ± 2.0 × 10¹⁰ vs. 5.7 × 10¹⁰ ± 1.7 × 10¹⁰, p = 0.006). PBSC‐GTX donors produced a remarkably high granulocyte yield (9.7 × 10¹⁰ ± 2.3 × 10¹⁰). The use of HES was associated with better granulocyte collection efficiency (42 ± 7.8% vs. 10 ± 9.1%, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: G‐CSF plus dexamethasone produces higher granulocyte yields than G‐CSF alone. Granulocyte collection from PBSC donors appears to be a rational strategy, since it produces high granulocyte yields when the related patients are at a high risk for infection and reduces difficulties in finding granulocyte donors. HES should be used in apheresis procedures.     

African American adult apheresis donors respond to granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor with neutrophil and progenitor cell yields comparable to those of Caucasian and Hispanic donors

BACKGROUND: Granulocyte–colony‐stimulating factor (G‐CSF)‐mobilized peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs) are the most common source of cells used for hematopoietic transplantation. Benign ethnic neutropenia has been found in persons of African descent, affecting circulating white blood cells (WBCs), but not WBC production within marrow. Persons of African descent have reduced neutrophil mobilization after steroid administration, and newborns have fewer nucleated and progenitor cells in their cord blood. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Twenty‐two African American (AA) and 12 Hispanic PBPC donors were age, sex, and weight matched with 34 Caucasian donors. Groups were compared based on WBC and neutrophil counts after mobilization and numbers of CD34+ cells collected on Day 5 of G‐CSF mobilization. RESULTS: AA donors had significantly lower baseline WBC (6.1 ± 1.1 vs. 7.1 ± 1.7, p = 0.04) and neutrophil (3.4 ± 1.1 vs. 4.5 ± 1.3, p = 0.01) counts compared to matched Caucasian donors. G‐CSF–stimulated AAs had a significantly greater increase in WBC and neutrophil counts compared to matched Caucasians (889 ± 293% vs. 665 ± 230% neutrophils, p = 0.02). There was no significant difference in product cell counts when comparing total nucleated, CD3+, CD34+, and mononuclear cells or colony‐forming units (CFUs) between Caucasians and Hispanics or AAs and trends to greater numbers of neutrophils in products from AA donors. CONCLUSION: When stimulated by G‐CSF, AAs are able to increase WBC and neutrophil counts to a higher degree than Caucasians, achieving similar numbers of neutrophil and progenitor cells in apheresis products despite starting from lower baseline blood counts.     

Mobilization of blood-derived stem and progenitor cells in normal subjects by granulocyte-macrophage- and granulocyte-colony-stimulating factors

BACKGROUND: It was previously reported that the combination of granulocyte-macrophage-colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and granulocyte-CSF (G-CSF) for 4 days mobilized more primitive CD34+ subsets than did either G-CSF or GM-CSF alone. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The studies determine the optimal number of days of growth factor dosing for mobilization and collection of peripheral blood progenitor cells, by increasing the days of administration of GM-CSF and/or G-CSF or employing the sequential administration of GM-CSF followed by G-CSF. Sixty normal subjects were given injections of G-CSF or GM-CSF alone; GM-CSF and G-CSF concurrently for 4, 5, or 6 days; or a sequential regimen of GM-CSF for 3 or 4 days followed by G-CSF for 2 or 3 days. A 10-L apheresis was performed 24 hours after the last dose. RESULTS: The three most efficacious mobilization regimens consisted of sequential GM-CSF for 3 days followed by G-CSF for either 2 or 3 days and G-CSF alone for 5 days. Each of these regimens resulted in the collection of significantly greater numbers of CD34+ cells by apheresis than any of the 4-day dosing regimens with G-CSF and/or GM-CSF (sequential GM-CSF/G-CSF: 3 days/2 days = 3.58 +/− 0.53 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg; GM-CSF/G-CSF: 3 days/3 days = 4.45 +/− 1.08 × 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg; G-CSF: 5 days = 3.58 +/− 0.97 × 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg; all p<0.05 vs. G-CSF and/or GM-CSF for 4 days). Clonogenic assays generally paralleled the level of CD34+ cells. Regimens containing GM-CSF resulted in a higher percentage of the cells from primitive CD34+/CD38- /HLA-DR+ subset than G-CSF alone. CONCLUSION: Compared with 4-day dosing regimens with G-CSF and/or GM-CSF, mobilization of CD34+ cells in normal subjects using sequential GM-CSF for 3 days followed by G-CSF for 2 or 3 days or using G-CSF alone for 5 days increased the number CD34+ cells that can be collected by a single 10-L apheresis 24 hours after the last dose of cytokine.     

G-CSF在恶性淋巴瘤患者体内诱导ENA-78和IL-8的作用研究

粒细胞集落刺激因子（G-CSF）可以刺激化疗诱导的中性粒细胞减少症患者恢复中性粒细胞计数,并在体外刺激其产生上皮来源的嗜中性粒细胞趋化蛋白-78（ENA-78）和白细胞介素8（IL-8）等趋化因子。本研究旨在探讨G-CSF在体内是否也有类似作用。研究对象为10例接受化疗及G-CSF治疗的淋巴瘤患者,分别在以下时间段采集外周血：化疗前,标记为TimePoint（TPl）;接受G-CSF治疗前的中性粒细胞减少阶段,标记为TP2;接受G-CSF治疗后的中性粒细胞恢复阶段,标记为TP3。采用实时定量PCR检测中性粒细胞内ENA-78和IL-8的mRNA含量,流式细胞术检测其吞噬功能及产生的活性氧（ROS）。结果表明,在TP2阶段,ENA-78mRNA表达升高者5例,儿-8mRNA表达升高者8例;在TP5阶段,ENA-78mRNA表达升高者3例,降低者6例,IL-8mRNA表达降低者7例。结论：中性粒细胞内ENA-78和IL-8的表达升高在化疗后中性粒细胞减少的患者体内较常见,而G-CSF干预对其升高无明显作用。     

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor enhances host defenses against bacterial pneumonia following peritonitis in nonneutropenic rats

OBJECTIVE: Polymorphonuclear cell functions frequently are impaired in critically ill patients, and restoration of normal functions could help to prevent nosocomial infections. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of pretreatment with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) on bacterial pneumonia induced 48 hrs after peritonitis (cecal ligation and puncture [CLP]) in rats. DESIGN: Controlled animal study. SETTING: Research laboratory of an academic institution. SUBJECTS: Male Sprague-Dawley rats. INTERVENTIONS: First, the CLP model was characterized. Second, alveolar endotoxin instillation allowed us to evaluate the ability of neutrophils to migrate to airspaces after CLP was assessed. In the last set of experiments, CLP was followed by G-CSF treatment as a preventive therapy for subsequent bacterial superinfection induced by alveolar instillation. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: CLP induced a brief increase in proinflammatory cytokines (tumor necrosis factor-alpha, interleukin-1beta) at the 6th hr followed by a longer-lived anti-inflammatory response (interleukin-10 increase from days 1 to 3) in plasma, compared with healthy rats. Impaired neutrophil migration to alveolar spaces denoting immunoparalysis was evidenced after endotracheal endotoxin instillation following CLP, compared with non-CLP rats challenged with endotoxin. No such impairment was found when G-CSF (100 microg/kg: glycosylated recombinant human G-CSF, Lenograstim) was given before endotoxin. G-CSF (100 microg/kg 24 and 48 hrs after CLP) given before endotracheal instillation increased bacterial clearance, as shown by counts in both bronchoalveolar lavage (8.9 x 10 +/- 2.8 x 10 colony-forming units/mL vs. 3.3 x 10 +/- 1.5 x 10 colony-forming units/mL with saline) and lung tissue (4.2 x 10 +/- 1.0 x 10 colony-forming units/g vs. 1.5 x 10 +/- 0.6 x 10 colony-forming units/g with saline). Furthermore, G-CSF pretreatment kept clearance in CLP rats similar to that in non-CLP rats challenged with. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that G-CSF (Lenograstim) may enhance host defenses in rats with peritonitis and immunoparalysis.