A Phase I clinical trial of ixabepilone (BMS-247550), an epothilone B analog, administered intravenously on a daily schedule for 3 days

BACKGROUND: The epothilones are a novel class of microtubule-stabilizing agents. Ixabepilone (BMS-247550; NSC 710428) is a semisynthetic analog of the natural product epothilone B. The authors conducted a Phase I study by administering ixabepilone to patients as a 1-hour intravenous infusion daily for 3 consecutive days every 21 days. METHODS: Twenty-six patients were enrolled and received ixabepilone at a starting dose of 8 or 10 mg/m(2) per day for 3 consecutive days. RESULTS: One hundred and nineteen cycles were administered to 26 patients. The maximum-tolerated dose was 8 mg/m(2) per day of ixabepilone administered as a 1-hour intravenous infusion daily for 3 consecutive days every 21 days. The dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was neutropenia. Other nonhematologic Grade 3 toxicities included fatigue (3 cycles), hyponatremia (1 cycle), anorexia (1 cycle), ileus (1 cycle), stomatitis (1 cycle), and emesis (1 cycle). Prolonged disease stabilization was observed in patients with mesothelioma, ovarian carcinoma, and renal cell carcinoma. CONCLUSIONS: The recommended Phase II dose of ixabepilone on the daily schedule for 3 days was 8-10 mg/m(2) per day. Neutropenia was the DLT. Peripheral neuropathy was mild, even after multiple cycles of therapy, and was not dose limiting.     

Phase I clinical trial of BMS-247550, a derivative of epothilone B, using accelerated titration 2B design.

PURPOSE: BMS-247550 is a semisynthetic derivative of epothilone B with mechanism of action analogous to paclitaxel. It has shown impressive antitumor activity in preclinical studies including in taxane-resistant models. We conducted a phase I trial, based on accelerated titration "2B" design, of BMS-247550 given as a 1-hour infusion every 3 weeks. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Seventeen patients (M:F, 10:7; median age, 54 years; performance status, 0-2) were treated on the trial. Forty-five cycles (1-9 cycles) of BMS-247550 were given at dosages ranging from 7.4 to 56 mg/m2. All patients received prophylaxis for hypersensitivity reactions, related to Cremophor-EL, with steroids and histamine antagonists. RESULTS: First-course dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was observed in two of three patients at 56 mg/m2 (neutropenic sepsis, prolonged grade 4 neutropenia) and in one of six patients at 40 mg/m2. Nonhematologic grade 3 to 4 toxicities observed were emesis and fatigue and they occurred only at 56 mg/m2. Grade 1 to 2 peripheral neuropathy was also observed. Other grade 1 to 2 toxicities were myalgias, arthralgias, rash, hand/foot syndrome, and mucositis. AUC and C(max) seemed proportional to the dose and the DLT. Development of neutropenia with BMS-247550 is related to the duration of drug exposure above a threshold. CONCLUSIONS: The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of BMS-247550 is 40 mg/m2 given every 3 weeks. Neutropenia is the DLT. The accelerated titration "2B" design may help in determining MTD with fewer patients enrolled and more being treated closer to the MTD. However, the accelerated titration design did not seem to shorten the study duration.     

Pilot study of epothilone B analog (BMS-247550) and estramustine phosphate in patients with progressive metastatic prostate cancer following castration.

BACKGROUND: Several trials have demonstrated that the response proportions to microtubule agents in patients with prostate cancer are increased by the addition of estramustine phosphate (EMP). The epothilone B analog BMS-247550 is a novel microtubule agent that has shown activity in taxane-resistant tumors. We conducted a dose-escalation study to determine a safe dose of BMS-247550 to combine with EMP in patients with metastatic prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Chemotherapy-naive patients with castrate-metastatic prostate cancer were treated with intravenous BMS-247550 and oral EMP (280 mg three times daily for 5 days) every 3 weeks. RESULTS: Thirteen patients were treated at two dose levels (35 and 40 mg/m(2)). Three of six patients treated at 40 mg/m(2) developed grade 4 neutropenia, establishing 35 mg/m(2) as the maximum-tolerated dose. Significant peripheral neuropathy (grade >/= 2) was related to dose level and infusion rate. A decline in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) of >/= 50% was seen in 11 of 12 evaluable patients (92%) (95% confidence interval 76% to 100%). There were objective responses in soft tissue (57%) and bone metastasis (40%). CONCLUSIONS: The phase II dose of BMS-247550 combined with EMP is 35 mg/m(2) over 3 h every 3 weeks. This combination is safe and >/= 50% post-therapy declines in PSA were seen in 11 of 12 patients (92%).     

Phase I clinical and pharmacokinetic study of BMS-247550, a novel derivative of epothilone B, in solid tumors.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose, toxicity, and pharmacokinetics of BMS-247550 administered as a 1-h i.v. infusion every 3 weeks. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Patients with advanced solid malignancies were premedicated and treated with escalating doses of BMS-247550. Blood sampling was performed to characterize the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of BMS-247550. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients were treated at six dose levels ranging from 7.4 to 59.2 mg/m(2). At 50 mg/m(2), 4 of 9 patients (44.4%) had dose-limiting toxicity (neutropenia, abdominal pain/nausea). At 40 mg/m(2) (the recommended Phase II dose), 2 of 12 patients (16.7%) had dose-limiting neutropenia. Overall, the most common nonhematological toxicity was fatigue/generalized weakness (grade 3-4 seen in 9.0% of patients), followed by neurosensory deficits manifested as peripheral neuropathy and by gastrointestinal discomfort. At 40 mg/m(2), the incidence of grade 3 fatigue, abdominal pain, diarrhea, and neuropathy was 7.7%. Grade 1-2 neuropathy was observed in all patients enrolled and treated at 40 mg/m(2). Two patients with paclitaxel-refractory ovarian cancer, one patient with taxane-na?ve breast cancer, and another patient with docetaxel-refractory breast cancer had objective partial responses (lasting 6.0, 5.3, 3.0, and 4.5 months, respectively). The mean pharmacokinetic parameter values during course 1 for clearance, volume of distribution, and apparent terminal elimination half-life at the 40 mg/m(2) (recommended Phase II dose) dose level were 21 liters/h/m(2), 826 liters/m(2), and 35 h (excluding one outlier of 516 h), respectively. Values during course 1 and course 2 were similar. CONCLUSIONS: The recommended dose for Phase II evaluation of BMS-247550 is 40 mg/m(2), although more long-term observations are needed. BMS-247550 has advantages over taxanes in relation to drug resistance and warrants further study.     

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of BMS-184476, a taxane with greater potency and solubility than paclitaxel.

PURPOSE: To assess the feasibility, toxicity, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary activity of BMS-184476 administered as a 1-hour intravenous (IV) infusion every 3 weeks. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with advanced solid malignancies were treated with escalating doses of BMS-184476 as a 1-hour IV infusion every 3 weeks without premedication to prevent hypersensitivity reactions (HSR). Plasma sampling and urine collections were performed to characterize the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of BMS-184474. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients were treated with 78 courses of BMS-184476 at five dose levels ranging from 20 to 80 mg/m2. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), consisting of severe neutropenia with fever, severe diarrhea, and/or severe mucositis, was experienced during course 1 by six of nine minimally pretreated patients treated at the 70 and 80 mg/m2 dose level. In contrast, of 15 assessable patients treated at the 60 mg/m2 dose level, which is the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of BMS-184476 on this administration schedule, only one heavily pretreated patient developed DLT (grade 4 neutropenia with fever and grade 3 diarrhea). One patient developed a grade 2 HSR during a second course of BMS-184476 at the 40 mg/m2 dose level. A previously untreated patient with an advanced cholangiocarcinoma experienced a partial response, and a patient with an untreated carcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction had a minor response. The pharmacokinetics of BMS-184476 seemed linear in the dose range studied. Mean +/- SD values for clearance, volume of distribution at steady-state, and terminal half-life were 220 +/- 89 mL/min/m2, 402 +/- 231 L/m2, and 40.8 +/- 21.8 hours, respectively. CONCLUSION: The MTD and recommended dose for phase II evaluations of BMS-184476 is 60 mg/m2 as a 1-hour IV infusion every 3 weeks. The results of this study suggest that BMS-184476 may have several advantages compared with paclitaxel in terms of toxicity, pharmacokinetics, pharmaceutics, and administration and warrants further clinical development.     

A phase II trial of the epothilone B analog, BMS-247550, in patients with previously treated advanced colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: The epothilone B analog, BMS-247550, is a non-taxane microtubulin-stabilizing agent with preclinical activity in taxane-resistant cell lines and phase I activity in colorectal cancer. We conducted a phase II study of single-agent BMS-247550 in advanced colorectal cancer patients who had disease progression following treatment with irinotecan-5-fluorouracil-leucovorin (IFL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were required to have histologically or cytologically confirmed advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer; progressed on or after chemotherapy with IFL; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status < or =1; peripheral neuropathy grade < or =1; and adequate laboratory parameters. BMS-247550 40 mg/m(2) was administered intravenously over 3 h every 3 weeks. Patients were evaluated for response every 6 weeks. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients were enrolled; all were evaluable for toxicity and 23 were evaluable for response. There were no complete or partial responses. Thirteen patients (56%) had stable disease after two cycles of therapy; five patients (20%) received six or more cycles. The median time to progression was 11 weeks; median overall survival was 36 weeks. There was considerable grade 3/4 hematological toxicity, including neutropenia (48%) and leukopenia (36%). Grade 3/4 non-hematological toxicities included grade 3 hypersensitivity reaction (12%) and peripheral neuropathy (20%). CONCLUSIONS: Single-agent BMS-247550 (40 mg/m(2)) administered every 21 days demonstrated no activity in advanced colorectal cancer. Peripheral neuropathy was treatment-limiting.     

Validation of the pharmacodynamics of BMS-247550, an analogue of epothilone B, during a phase I clinical study.

The primary aims of this study were to evaluate the timecourse and dose response of microtubule bundle formationin peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and to correlate these data with BMS-247550 pharmacokinetics. The data presented here were obtained from 17 patients enrolled in a Phase I trial who received five dose levels of BMS-247550 (7.4-59.2 mg/m(2)), given as a 1-h infusion once every 3 weeks. Plasma drug exposure or area under the curve (AUC), and tubulin bundle formation in PBMCs were assessed in cycles 1 and 2. Similar analyses were also performed on tumor biopsies from one eligible patient. PBMCs exhibited dramatic microtubule bundle formation 1 h after infusion that declined by 24 h, showing a positive correlation with AUC((0-24)) for cycles 1 and 2. A similar pattern of tubulin bundle formation also was observed in a smaller proportion of breast tumor cells from one patient who exhibited a partial response to BMS-247550. This patient's tumor expressed multidrug resistance (MDR1) and MDR-associated protein (MRP1), and in addition poly(ADPribose) polymerase cleavage, a marker of cell death, was observed within 23 h after drug infusion. This patient was also heterozygous for a novel polymorphism at the extreme COOH terminus of beta-tubulin (Gly 437 Gly/Ser), although the relevance of the polymorphism to the response is unknown. In summary, microtubule bundle formation in PBMCs occurs within 1 h of treatment with BMS-247550 and is related to plasma AUC. Similar bundle formation was seen in one tumor sample, despite expression of MDR1 and MRP1. Cell death occurred 23 h after peak microtubule bundle formation in these tumor cells. These findings validate in vitro pharmacodynamic observations.     

Blinded, randomized, multicenter study to evaluate single administration pegfilgrastim once per cycle versus daily filgrastim as an adjunct to chemotherapy in patients with high-risk stage II or stage III/IV breast cancer.

PURPOSE: This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, active-control study was designed to determine whether a single subcutaneous injection of pegfilgrastim (SD/01, sustained-duration filgrastim; 100 microg/kg) is as safe and effective as daily filgrastim (5 microg/kg/d) for reducing neutropenia in patients who received four cycles of myelosuppressive chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-two centers enrolled 310 patients who received chemotherapy with docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) and doxorubicin 60 mg/m(2) on day 1 of each cycle for a maximum of four cycles. Patients were randomized to receive on day 2 either a single subcutaneous injection of pegfilgrastim 100 microg/kg per chemotherapy cycle (154 patients) or daily subcutaneous injections of filgrastim 5 microg/kg/d (156 patients). Absolute neutrophil count (ANC), duration of grade 4 neutropenia, and safety parameters were monitored. RESULTS: One dose of pegfilgrastim per chemotherapy cycle was comparable to daily subcutaneous injections of filgrastim with regard to all efficacy end points, including the duration of severe neutropenia and the depth of ANC nadir in all cycles. Febrile neutropenia across all cycles occurred less often in patients who received pegfilgrastim. The difference in the mean duration of severe neutropenia between the pegfilgrastim and filgrastim treatment groups was less than 1 day. Pegfilgrastim was safe and well tolerated, and it was similar to filgrastim. Adverse event profiles in the pegfilgrastim and filgrastim groups were similar. CONCLUSION: A single injection of pegfilgrastim 100 microg/kg per cycle was as safe and effective as daily injections of filgrastim 5 microg/kg/d in reducing neutropenia and its complications in patients who received four cycles of doxorubicin 60 mg/m(2) and docetaxel 75 mg/m(2).     

Phase I study of BMS-214662, a farnesyl transferase inhibitor in patients with acute leukemias and high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes.

PURPOSE: To investigate the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of BMS-214662, a farnesyl transferase (FTase) inhibitor, in patients with acute leukemias and high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with relapsed or refractory acute leukemias or MDS, or previously untreated but poor candidates for chemotherapy, were included in this phase I study with a 3 + 3 dose escalation design. BMS-214662 was administered as a 1-hour bolus once weekly at doses of 42 to 157 mg/m2. Once the MTD was identified, the schedule was changed to a 24-hour continuous infusion once weekly (starting dose, 300 mg/m2). RESULTS: Thirty patients were treated at a dose of 42 (n = 1), 56 (n = 3), 84 (n = 3), 118 (n = 13), 157 (n = 6) or 300 mg/m2 (n = 4). DLT occurred in 3 patients at 157 mg/m2, including nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, hypokalemia and cardiovascular problems. No DLT occurred with 24-hour continuous infusion. MTD with a 1-hour infusion was 118 mg/m2, with no MTD identified with the 24-hour infusion. Plasma concentrations of BMS-214662 correlated with the dose. Inhibition of FTase activity of approximately 60% occurred after the infusion with recovery to near baseline after 24 hours. Five patients had evidence of antileukemia activity, including two with complete remission with incomplete platelet recovery, one with hematologic improvement, and two with morphologic leukemia-free state. CONCLUSION: BMS-214662 is well tolerated at doses of up to 118 mg/m2 as a 1-hour infusion. The toxicity profile and efficacy may be improved with prolonged exposure. Further investigation of this agent in leukemia is warranted.     

Phase I trial of multiple cycles of high-dose carboplatin, paclitaxel, and topotecan with peripheral-blood stem-cell support as front-line therapy.

PURPOSE: To determine the safety and feasibility of delivering multiple cycles of front-line high-dose carboplatin, paclitaxel, and topotecan with peripheral-blood stem-cell (PBSC) support. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were required to have a malignant solid tumor for which they had received no prior chemotherapy. Mobilization of PBSC was achieved with either filgrastim alone or in combination with cyclophosphamide and paclitaxel. Patients then received three or four cycles of high-dose carboplatin (area under the concentration-time curve [AUC] 16), paclitaxel (250 mg/m(2)), and topotecan (10-15 mg/m(2)), with the latter two agents administered as 24-hour infusions and supported with PBSC and filgrastim. Cycles were repeated every 28 days. RESULTS: Twenty patients were enrolled onto the trial and were assessable for toxicity and clinical outcome. Dose-limiting toxicities were stomatitis and prolonged hematopoietic recovery. The maximum-tolerated dose of topotecan was 12.5 mg/m(2) when given with high-dose carboplatin and paclitaxel for three cycles. Four cycles were able to be given with a dose of topotecan of 10 mg/m(2). The pharmacokinetics of each compound were not affected by the other agents. Eleven (85%) of 13 patients with assessable disease responded. CONCLUSION: Multiple cycles of high-dose carboplatin, paclitaxel, and topotecan can be safely administered with filgrastim and PBSC support. The recommended doses for phase II study are carboplatin AUC 16, paclitaxel 250 mg/m(2), and topotecan 10 mg/m(2). Trials are currently being conducted with this regimen as front-line treatment in patients with advanced ovarian cancer and extensive small-cell carcinoma. This approach remains experimental and should be used only in the context of a clinical trial.     

A randomized double-blind multicenter phase III study of fixed-dose single-administration pegfilgrastim versus daily filgrastim in patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the efficacy of a single fixed 6 mg dose of pegfilgrastim (a pegylated version of filgrastim) per cycle of chemotherapy, compared with daily administration of filgrastim, in the provision of neutrophil support. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients (n = 157) were randomized to receive either a single 6 mg subcutaneous (s.c.) injection of pegfilgrastim or daily 5 mg/kg s.c. injections of filgrastim, after doxorubicin and docetaxel chemotherapy (60 mg/m(2) and 75 mg/m(2), respectively). Duration of grade 4 neutropenia, depth of neutrophil nadir, incidence of febrile neutropenia, time to neutrophil recovery and safety information were recorded. RESULTS: A single 6 mg injection of pegfilgrastim was as effective as daily injections of filgrastim for all efficacy measures for all cycles. The mean duration of grade 4 neutropenia in cycle 1 was 1.8 and 1.6 days for the pegfilgrastim and filgrastim groups, respectively. Results for all efficacy end points in cycles 2-4 were consistent with the results from cycle 1. A trend towards a lower incidence of febrile neutropenia was noted across all cycles with pegfilgrastim compared with filgrastim (13% versus 20%, respectively). A single fixed dose of pegfilgrastim was as safe and well tolerated as standard daily filgrastim. CONCLUSIONS: A single fixed dose of pegfilgrastim administered once per cycle of chemotherapy was comparable to multiple daily injections of filgrastim in safely providing neutrophil support during myelosuppressive chemotherapy. Pegfilgrastim may have utility in other clinical settings of neutropenia.     

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study of the combination of docetaxel and topotecan in patients with solid tumors.

PURPOSE: The sequence in which chemotherapeutic agents are administered can alter their pharmacokinetics, therapeutic effect, and toxicity. We evaluated the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of docetaxel and topotecan when coadministered on two different sequences of administration. PATIENTS AND METHODS: On cycle 1, docetaxel was administered as a 1-hour infusion at 60 mg/m(2) without filgrastim and at 60, 70, and 80 mg/m(2) with filgrastim on day 1, and topotecan was administered at 0.75 mg/m(2) as a 0.5-hour infusion on days 1 to 4. On cycle 2, topotecan was administered on days 1 to 4, and docetaxel was administered on day 4. Cycles were repeated every 21 days. Blood samples for high-performance liquid chromatography measurement of docetaxel (CL(DOC)) and topotecan (CL(TPT)) total clearance were obtained on day 1 of cycle 1 and day 4 of cycle 2. CL(DOC) and CL(TPT) were calculated using compartmental methods. RESULTS: Mean +/- SD CL(DOC) in cycles 1 and 2 were 75.9 +/- 79.6 L/h/m(2) and 29.2 +/- 17.3 L/h/m(2), respectively (P: <.046). Mean +/- SD CL(TPT) in cycles 1 and 2 were 8.5 +/- 4.4 L/h/m(2) and 9.3 +/- 3.4 L/h/m(2), respectively (P: >. 05). Mean +/- SD neutrophil nadir in cycles 1 and 2 were 4,857 +/- 6, 738/microL and 2,808 +/- 4,518/microL, respectively (P: =.02). CONCLUSION: Administration of topotecan on days 1 to 4 and docetaxel on day 4 resulted in an approximately 50% decrease in docetaxel clearance and was associated with increased neutropenia.     

Multi-day fractionated administration schedule for paclitaxel

PURPOSE: To establish the feasibility of fractionating paclitaxel administrationby utilizing daily one-hour infusions for three, four or fivedays with dose escalating to determine the patterns of hematologicand non hematologic toxicities. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty patients received 87 courses of daily fractionated paclitaxelfor three, four or five days; cycles were repeated every 21days. Six patients received concomitant daily cisplatin. Themedian number of cycles delivered per patient was two with arange of one to six. RESULTS: Cumulative doses per cycle ranged from 120 mg/m² to 250 mg/m²with 25% of the cycles delivering 200 mg/m² or more. Ten cycles(11.5%) were associated with dose limiting neutropenia (grade3 [7 cycles]; grade 4 [3 cycles]). No hypersensitivity reactionswere observed and no patient required cytokine support. No patientrequired hos-pitalization. CONCLUSION: Administering paclitaxel on a daily fractioned schedule in anambulatory setting is logistically feasible; does not requirepremedication; is associated with a toxicity pattern similarto single day schedules (e.g. 24-hour or three-hour infusion);is capable of delivering a higher dose per cycle than published96- or 120-hour infusion schedules; and could possibly be escalatedto doses higher than 250 mg/m² in carefully selected patients.The optimal dose rate for five-day multifrac-tionated administrationof paclitaxel is 40 to 50 mg/m²/d or a cumulative cycle doseof 200 to 250 mg/m² and does not require cytokine usage. Addingcisplatin on a fractionated daily schedule may accentuate theneurotoxicity associated with both agents. A prospective comparisonof four-day fractionated vs. four-day continuous infusionalpaclitaxel has been proposed as a randomized study to determineclinical differences in response, dose intensity and toxicity. paclitaxel, schedule-dependent administration     

Weekly gemcitabine and 24-hour infusional 5-fluorouracil in advanced pancreatic cancer: a phase I-II study

OBJECTIVE: In this phase I-II study we explored the potential of the combination of weekly gemcitabine (GEM) and 24-hour continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in order to determine the toxicity profile in pancreatic cancer. The efficacy of this drug combination was studied as a secondary endpoint. METHODS: Twenty-one patients with histologically or cytologically proven unresectable or metastatic previously untreated pancreatic adenocarcinoma were included in this study. Two dose levels of GEM and two dose levels of 5-FU were evaluated in three cohorts of patients who received GEM 1,000 mg/m(2) and 5-FU 2,000 mg/m(2), GEM 1,200 mg/m(2) and 5-FU 2,000 mg/m(2), or GEM 1,200 mg/m(2) and 5-FU 2,250 mg/m(2), on days 1, 8, and 15, every 4 weeks, respectively. RESULTS: Grade 3-4 neutropenia was observed in 10% of the cycles. Non-myelosuppressive toxicities included fatigue (22%), grade 1-2 diarrhea (12%) and grade 1 liver toxicity. There was no limiting toxicity and the maximum tolerated dose has not been reached. Two patients experienced a partial response (9.5 +/- 12.6%) and 12 patients had stable disease (57.1 +/- 21.2%). Seven of the 14 symptomatic patients improved their disease-related symptoms and 4 of the 8 patients evaluable for clinical benefit had a clinically beneficial response (50 +/- 34.6%). The median progression-free survival was 6 months (range 2-28), median survival was 11 months (range 3-32+), and the actuarial 1-year survival rate 33%. CONCLUSION: The weekly administration of GEM combined with 24-hour continuous infusion of 5-FU shows a good safety profile at the dose levels evaluated. Some partial responses had also been achieved, disregarding the dose level of the two drugs. Survival confirms the activity of this drug combination.     

Phase I and clinical pharmacological evaluation of aphidicolin glycinate

The toxicity profile and the pharmacokinetics of aphidicolin glycinate, a water-soluble analogue of aphidicolin, have been evaluated in two consecutive phase I clinical studies. In the first study, aphidicolin glycinate was given by 1-hour infusion for 5 consecutive days, every 3 weeks (daily x 5 study); in the second study, which was planned on the basis of the pharmacokinetic information obtained in the previous study, the drug was given by 24-hour continuous infusion. Treatment was repeated every 3 weeks. In the daily x 5 study, the daily dose was escalated from 12 mg/m2 to the maximum tolerated dose of 2250 mg/m2. Local toxicity was dose limiting. Elimination half-life was 2 +/- 0.2 hours (mean +/- SE) with aphidicolin being undetectable 6-8 hours after the end of the infusion. In the 24-hour continuous-infusion study, the dose was escalated from 435 mg/m2 to the maximum tolerated dose of 4500 mg/m2. Local toxicity was dose limiting, while other toxic effects were absent. The experimentally determined concentrations at the steady state were in agreement with those predicted on the basis of the available pharmacokinetic data. The targeted concentration at the steady state of 3 micrograms/mL was achieved at doses greater than or equal to 3000 mg/m2. Twenty-four-hour continuous infusion is the recommended schedule for clinical evaluations of aphidicolin glycinate as the synchronizing agent or in combination with cisplatin.     

A phase I study of paclitaxel and epirubicin, without and with filgrastim, for the treatment of platinum-resistant advanced ovarian cancer.

The aim of the study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of epirubicin combined with a fixed dose of paclitaxel, without and with support of filgrastim, in patients with platinum resistant or refractory ovarian cancer. Paclitaxel (150 mg/m2) and epirubicin (starting dose 90 mg/m2, 15 mg/m2 escalation per level) were given on day 1, every 28 days for 4-6 cycles. Filgrastim (F) (5 microg/kg/die) was given in case of grade 4 leukopenia (levels without support) or from day 4 up to leukocyte count >10,000/mm3 after nadir (levels with support). Cohorts of 3 patients were enrolled at each level and further 3 patients were planned if 1 or 2 unacceptable toxic events (UTE) were registered. MTD was determined first without and then with filgrastim. Four levels were studied (90, 90+F, 105+F, 120+F) with 4, 6, 5 and 4 patients enrolled, respectively. UTE (grade 4 neutropenia) were observed in 3 patients at level 1. Thus, 90 mg/m2 was the MTD for epirubicin without filgrastim. MTD of epirubicin with filgrastim was not reached at 120 mg/m2. Hematological toxicity was mild. Grade 3 mucositis was reported in 1 patient. Among the 14 patients with measurable or evaluable disease, 3 objective responses were observed (1 complete and 2 partial) for an overall response rate of 21.4%. The combination of paclitaxel 150 mg/m2 and epirubicin at 120 mg/m2 with filgrastim is a feasible therapy. Grade 4 leukopenia is the dose limiting toxicity using epirubicin at 90 mg/m2 without filgrastim.     

Phase I clinical and pharmacokinetic study of flavopiridol in children with refractory solid tumors: a Children's Oncology Group Study.

PURPOSE: To determine the dose-limiting toxicities, maximum-tolerated dose, and pharmacokinetics of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor flavopiridol (NSC 649890) when administered as a 1-hour infusion over 3 consecutive days to children with recurrent or refractory solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Flavopiridol was administered as a 1-hour intravenous infusion daily for 3 consecutive days every 21 days, or when hematologic toxicity or any grade 2 or greater nonhematologic toxicity resolved. The starting dose was 37.5 mg/m2/d. Dose escalation was in cohorts of three patients in a standard fashion until dose-limiting toxicity and the maximum-tolerated dose were determined. Flavopiridol levels were measured on days 1, 2, and 3. RESULTS: Twenty-five children received flavopiridol at doses of 37.5 to 80 mg/m2/day over 3 consecutive days. The maximum-tolerated dose was 62.5 mg/m2/d. The primary dose-limiting toxicities were neutropenia and diarrhea. No antitumor effect was observed in this population. Mean peak plasma concentrations of 3.71 and 9.11 micromol/L were achieved at the end of the 1-hour infusion, following dose escalation from 37.5 mg/m2 to 80 mg/m2, respectively. The median flavopiridol plasma clearance was 8.0 L/h/m2 (range, 2.6 to 17.1 L/h/m2). CONCLUSION: The maximum-tolerated dose of flavopiridol in children, and the recommended phase II dose for pediatric studies, was 62.5 mg/m2/day when administered as a 1-hour infusion for 3 consecutive days. Dose-limiting toxicities of neutropenia and diarrhea were similar to those in adult studies.     

A Phase I-II study of 96-hour infusional topotecan and paclitaxel for patients with recurrent Müllerian tumors

BACKGROUND: Topotecan and paclitaxel are schedule dependent chemotherapeutic agents with activity against ovarian carcinoma. A Phase I-II study in which both drugs were administered concurrently by 96-hour, continuous, intravenous infusion was performed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), toxicities, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of the combination. METHODS: Women with ovarian or primary peritoneal carcinoma and documented recurrent disease were eligible for the study. The dose of topotecan was escalated from 1.6 mg/m(2) while maintaining the paclitaxel dose constant at 100 mg/m(2). Plasma concentrations of both drugs were monitored daily during the first cycle of therapy. RESULTS: Forty-five patients with a median age of 54 years (range, 42-70 years) received 181 cycles of therapy. Five patients were recruited to each of four dose levels (topotecan 1.6 mg/m(2), 2.0 mg/m(2), 2.8 mg/m(2), and 3.6 mg/m(2)), and an additional 25 patients were treated at the MTD (Phase II). Neutropenia and thrombocytopenia became dose limiting toxicities (DLT) at the fourth dose level. Emesis, mucositis, peripheral neuropathy, diarrhea, and alopecia were mild. Twenty patients (44%) had line-related occlusion, thrombosis, or infection. The mean values (+/- standard deviation) of the apparent steady-state plasma concentrations at the Phase II doses were 2.3 nM +/- 0.5 nM for topotecan lactone, 5.6 nM +/- 2.1 nM for total topotecan, and 40.1 nM +/- 16.8 nM for paclitaxel. There were seven partial responses (Phase II) contributing to an objective response rate of 28% and a median survival time of 11.7 months (range, 0.6-20.1 months). CONCLUSIONS: Topotecan at a dose of 2.8 mg/m(2) and paclitaxel at a dose of 100 mg/m(2) administered by concurrent, 96-hour, continuous intravenous infusions shows activity against tumors of Müllerian origin.     

Potential radiation-sensitizing effect of semisynthetic epothilone B in human lung cancer cells.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To evaluate a semisynthetic epothilone B, BMS-247550, as a potential radiosensitizer in vitro and in vivo. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Human NCI-H460 lung cancer cells were treated with either BMS-247550 or paclitaxel and in combination with radiation at multiple doses for different time periods. Surviving fractions were then analyzed using a clonogenic assay. Cell cycle redistribution by BMS-247550 was measured with propidium iodide and flow cytometry. Percent apoptosis was also measured using 7-amino-actinomycin D staining with flow cytometry. For in vivo studies, the H460 xenograft model was used in athymic nude mice. Tumors were treated with BMS-247550 (5 mg/kg) i.p. injection on days 0, 2, and 4 and/or radiation (2 Gy/day, days 0-4). RESULTS: The in vitro radiation dose enhancement ratios (DER) of 1-h BMS-247550 and paclitaxel were 2.03 and 1.34, respectively. Treatment with BMS-247550 enhanced the G2/M block and induced apoptosis; whereas in combination with radiation, the induction of apoptosis was additive. BMS-247550 in combination with radiation in vivo enhanced the tumor growth delay when compared with either drug or radiation alone. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrated that BMS-247550 could enhance the effects of radiation in human lung cancer cells both in vitro and in vivo and that a G2/M block and increased apoptosis might be possible explanations for the enhancement.     

Sequential cycles of high-dose carboplatin administered with recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor and repeated infusions of autologous peripheral-blood progenitor cells: a novel and effective method for delivering multiple courses of dose-intensive therapy.

PURPOSE: The trial was undertaken to study the effect of administering granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) with and without peripheral-blood progenitor cells (PBPC) on the hematologic and nonhematologic toxicity observed with multiple cycles of high-dose carboplatin chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eighteen patients with a variety of solid tumors received a total of 40 cycles of carboplatin, 1,200 mg/m2 per cycle, administered by continuous infusion over 96 hours. All 40 courses were administered with a daily 4-hour intravenous (IV) infusion of either 5 or 10 micrograms/kg/d of recombinant human Escherichia coli-derived GM-CSF. The first 20 courses were administered without PBPC support (treatment A). Because of severe neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, the next 20 courses of therapy were administered with GM-CSF, PBPC, and oral antibiotic prophylaxis (treatment B). RESULTS: The addition of PBPC support led to a significant reduction in the duration of neutropenia (10.5 v 7.5 days; P = .027) and thrombocytopenia (12.4 v 5.2 days; P = .001), number of RBC transfusions (six v three; P = .01) and platelet transfusions (10.3 v 3.7; P = .013), number of hospital days (12.6 v 2.9; P = .01), and days of IV antibiotics (11.8 v 2.4; P = .007) per cycle. Significant increases in the weekly dose intensity (206 v 285 mg/m2/wk; P = .014) and total dose (2,287 v 3,600 mg/m2; P = .018) of carboplatin delivered were also observed with treatment B. The overall response rate in this study was 70%, with 11 of 16 assessable patients achieving either a complete (three patients) or partial (eight patients) remission. CONCLUSION: This combination of GM-CSF and PBPC infusion represents an effective method for delivering multiple cycles of high-dose carboplatin chemotherapy and may serve as a model for the administration of high-dose chemotherapy in future trials.