Acid and bile reflux in erosive reflux disease, non-erosive reflux disease and Barrett's esophagus

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) may occur with acid, bile or in a mixed form. Endoscopic injury and mucosal metaplasia are a known sequlae to pathological GERD. The aim of the study was to determine the contribution of acid and duodenogastroesophageal reflux (DGER) to endoscopic severity in patients with GERD and Barrett's esophagus. METHODS: Ninety-one patients complaining of reflux symptoms were studied with upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and graded to non-erosive reflux disease (NERD), erosive reflux disease (ERD) and Barrett's esophagus (BE). Esophageal manometry and simultaneous ambulatory 24-h esophageal pH and bilirubin monitoring (Bilitec 2000) were done to all patients. RESULTS: Seventy one patients (78.0%) had ERD (Savary-Miller (grade I-III), 11 patients (12.1%) had NERD and 9 patients (9.9%) had BE suspected endoscopically and diagnosed by histological esophageal biopsy. Combined 24-h esophageal bilirubin and pH monitoring revealed that 39 patients (42.9%) had mixed acid and bile reflux, 16 (17.6%) had pathological acid reflux only, 18 (19.8%) had bile reflux only and 18 patients (19.8%) had no evidence of abnormal reflux. The percentage of the total time of bilirubin absorbance above 0.14, in 71 patients with ERD was (8.18 +/- 11.28%), and in 9 patients with BE was (15.48 +/- 30.48%) which was significantly greater than that in 11 patients with NERD (4.48 +/- 8.99%), p < 0.05 and p = 0.01 respectively. All BE patients had abnormal esophageal bile reflux (3 bile alone and 6 mixed bile and acid); 44 of 71 patients (61.97%) with ERD had abnormal esophageal bile reflux (13 bile alone and 31 mixed bile and acid); meanwhile 15 of them (21.2%) had abnormal acid exposure alone. Of the 11 patients with NERD, 4 patients (36.4%) had abnormal esophageal bile reflux, 2 of them mixed with acid. CONCLUSIONS: The Bilitec method reliably identifies the presence of bilirubin and quantitatively detects duodenogastroesophageal reflux of bile. Mixed reflux (acid and bile) is the chief pattern of reflux in GERD patients in this study. Bile reflux either alone or mixed with acid reflux contributes to the severity of erosive and non-erosive reflux disease as well as to Barrett's esophagus.     

Utility of esophageal biopsy in the diagnosis of nonerosive reflux disease

This study evaluated the accuracy of esophageal biopsy for the diagnosis of nonerosive reflux disease (NERD) in adults. Thirty-five patients with reflux symptoms and a normal endoscopy were prospectively evaluated using esophageal biopsies, 24-h ambulatory pH monitoring and symptomatic response 4 weeks after an increase in antireflux therapy. Biopsies were scored for the total number of typical histologic reflux features seen. Patients were considered to have NERD if both pH-metry was positive and step-up therapy was successful. Biopsies were then compared to this predefined gold standard. Biopsy was most sensitive (62%) but poorly specific (27%) when one or more histologic reflux features were seen. A threshold of three or more histologic features improved the specificity (91%) but reduced sensitivity (31%). Response to step-up therapy was associated with 100% sensitivity and 100% negative predictive value when compared to biopsy and pH-metry as an alternate combined gold standard. In conclusion, biopsy is insensitive in diagnosing NERD but reasonably specific if three or more typical histologic reflux features are present.     

Is ineffective esophageal motility gastropharyngeal reflux disease？

AIM： TO evaluate the association between IEM and gastropharyngeal reflux disease （GPRD） in patients who underwent ambulatory 24-h dual-probe pH monitoring for the evaluation of supraesophageal symptoms.
METHODS： A total of 632 patients who underwent endoscopy, esophageal manometry and ambulatory 24-h dual-pH monitoring due to supraesophageal symptoms （e.g. globus, hoarseness, or cough） were enrolled. Of them, we selected the patients who had normal esophageal motility and IEM. The endoscopy and ambulatory pH monitoring findings were compared between the two groups.
RESULTS;： A total of 264 patients with normal esophageal motility and 195 patients with the diagnosis of IEM were included in this study. There was no difference in the frequency of reflux esophagitis and hiatal hernia between the two groups. All the variables showing gastroesophageal reflux and gastropharyngeal reflux were not different between the two groups. The frequency of GERD and GPRD, as defined by ambulatory pH monitoring, was not different between the two groups.
CONCLUSION： There was no association between IEM and GPRD as well as between IEM and GERD. IEM alone cannot be considered as a definitive marker for reflux disease.     

Nonerosive reflux disease: A pathophysiologic perspective

Nonerosive reflux disease (NERD) is the most common phenotype of gastroesophageal reflux disease. By definition, patients with NERD have typical reflux symptoms caused by the intraesophageal reflux of gastric contents but have no visible esophageal mucosal injury. This is in contrast to patients with reflux esophagitis, also known as erosive reflux disease, and Barrett’s esophagus, who have obvious esophageal mucosal injury on endoscopy. Only 50% of patients with NERD have pathologic esophageal acid contact time (ACT) as detected on 24-hour pH monitoring (ie, NERD-positive). NERD patients with physiologic esophageal ACT and good temporal correlation of symptoms with reflux events (symptom index > 50% or symptom-association probability > 95%) are considered to have esophageal hypersensitivity (ie, NERD-negative). Finally, patients with physiologic esophageal ACT but poor symptom-reflux correlation are now considered to have functional heartburn and not NERD. NERD-positive patients have motor dysfunction and acidic reflux abnormalities that are similar to patients with reflux esophagitis and Barrett’s esophagus, whereas NERD-negative patients have minimal abnormalities that are not much different than healthy controls. The histopathologic feature most indicative of NERD is the presence of dilated intercellular spaces within squamous epithelium, an ultrastructural abnormality readily identified on transmission electron microscopy and on light microscopy.     

Stratification and symptom characteristics of non-erosive reflux disease based on acid and duodenogastroesophageal reflux

Background and Aim: The subgroups and symptom characteristics of non‐erosive reflux disease (NERD) based on acid and duodenogastroesophageal reflux may be different in Chinese patients to Western patients. This study aimed to explore the stratification and symptom characteristics of patients with NERD. Methods: Patients with typical heartburn and/or acid regurgitation symptoms were enrolled. Each patient filled out a questionnaire. An upper gastrointestingal endoscopy was performed for each patient followed by simultaneous ambulatory 24‐h esophageal pH and Bilitec (bilirubin) monitoring. A symptom index (SI) of ≥50% was considered to be positive. Results: Eighty‐two consecutive NERD patients were evaluated. Abnormal (NERD pH+) and normal (NERD pH–) 24‐h pH tests were found in 24 (29.3%) and 58 (70.7%) patients, respectively. Among 42 NERD pH– patients who reported heartburn symptoms during monitoring, SI was positive in 19 (45.2%) patients (NE‐SI+) and negative in 23 (54.8%) patients (NE‐SI–). Pathological duodenogastroesophageal reflux (DGER) was found in 43 (52.4%) patients. No significant differences were noted regarding the prevalence of other upper gastrointestinal symptoms, except for acid regurgitation in NERD pH+ and NERD pH– groups. Additionally, no significant differences were seen in the prevalence of other symptoms, except for chest pain, in groups with pathological and normal DGER. Conclusion: The proportion of NERD patients with pathological acid reflux was somewhat lower than that reported in Western countries. The role of DGER in NERD may be important. It is difficult to differentiate whether NERD patients have pathological acid or bile reflux according to symptoms.     

非糜烂性反流病的食管动力与胃动素相关性研究

目的从胃肠激素-胃动素与食管动力方面探讨非糜烂性反流病（NERD）的发病机制。方法健康对照14例、反流性食管炎（RE）和NERD各30例参与试验。RE、NERD经症状评估和内镜诊断、结合24h食管pH动态监测、质子泵抑制剂（PPI）试验诊断入组。采用四通道胃肠功能仪检测食管动力,以下食管括约肌压力（LESP）、食管蠕动波推进速度、食管体部蠕动压力、下食管括约肌的松弛状况来表示;用放射免疫方法检测血浆胃动素（motilin,MTL）水平。结果NERD组胃动素水平较正常对照组明显降低（P〈0.01）,与RE组比较无显著性差异（P〉0.05）;LESP在NERD组、RE组、正常对照组间无显著性差异（P〉0.05）;食管蠕动波推进速度、食管体部蠕动压力、下食管括约肌的松弛状况在各组间无显著性差异（P〉0.05）;NERD组、RE组、正常对照组分别分析胃动素与各项动力学指标相关性,P均大于0.05。结论NERD患者的食管动力学改变与RE、正常对照并无区别,食管动力学各项指标与胃动素水平也不存在相关性;NERD、RE组胃动素水平明显低于正常对照组,胃动素在NERD的发生机制中可能起一定的作用。     

放大内镜下胃食管反流性疾病的临床研究

目的应用放大胃镜观察胃食管反流病内镜下表现，探讨其特征性微细结构表现。方法66例胃食管反流性疾病者（非糜烂性食管炎NERD44例、糜烂性食管炎EE12例、Barrett食管10例）和9名健康志愿者行24小时食管pH检测和放大胃镜检查，于病变部取活检行H．pylori检测。结果内镜下，NERD组77．2％患者齿状线呈锯齿状、三角形及舌形与正常对照组比较差异有显著性（P＜0．01）；EE组83．3％患者食管下段粘膜血管呈螺旋型、不规则型炎症性表现与NERD组比较差异有显著性（P＜0．05）；Barreu组100％患者齿状线下黏膜小凹形态呈分枝状、斑片状或绒毛状，与EE组相比差异有显著性（确切概率法P=0．0396）。结论放大内镜下胃食管返流病特征性表现对于胃食管反流病的诊断有重要意义。     

非糜烂性反流病患者食管动力特征分析

背景：食管动力障碍在胃食管反流病（GERD）的发生中起重要作用。目的：探讨不同类型非糜烂性反流病（NERD）的食管动力特征。方法：选取161例具有典型胃食管反流症状者和20名健康体检者,分别行上消化道内镜检查、24 h食管pH监测和食管测压。纳入内镜检查未见Barrett食管和食管黏膜破损、症状指数≥50%的NERD患者,根据其是否存在病理性酸反流分为异常酸反流组和食管酸高敏组,比较反流组（28例）、高敏组（13例）和对照组（15例）的食管测压结果。结果：反流组下食管括约肌（LES）长度较对照组显著缩短（P〈0.05）,LES压力显著降低（P〈0.05）,高敏组与对照组间则无明显差异。反流组和高敏组食管体部动力障碍均以食管远段为主,表现为收缩波幅降低、蠕动波传导速度减慢和非传导性收缩波比例增加,反流组改变更为明显。结论：不同类型NERD的食管动力特征存在差异。异常酸反流亚型NERD患者存在LES长度和压力异常,食管远段动力障碍更为明显。     

Nonerosive reflux disease

Nonerosive reflux disease (NERD) is the most common phenotype of gastroesophageal reflux disease. By definition, patients with NERD have typical reflux symptoms caused by the intraesophageal reflux of gastric contents but have no visible esophageal mucosal injury. This is in contrast to patients with erosive reflux disease (ERD) or Barrett's esophagus (BE) who have obvious esophageal mucosal injury on endosco-py. Only 50% of patients with NERD have pathologic esophageal acid exposure as detected on 24-h pH monitoring. NERD patients with physiologic esophageal acid exposure and good temporal correlation of symptoms with reflux events are considered to have esophageal hypersensitivity, while patients with no symptom-reflux correlation are considered to have functional heartburn. It is possible yet uncommon for NERD to progress to severe ERD (i.e. LA Grade C or D) or BE. Patients with NERD and pathologic esophageal acid exposure have motor dysfunction and acid reflux abnormalities that are similar to patients with ERD and BE, whereas NERD patients with physiologic esophageal acid exposure have minimal abnormalities and are not much different than healthy controls. The pathological feature most indicative of NERD is the presence of dilated intercellular spaces within squamous epithelium, an ultrastructural abnormality readily identified on transmission electron microscopy but also on light microscopy. A symptomatic response to an empiric trial of high-dose proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy is a simple and useful strategy to establish the diagnosis of NERD, although histology and pH monitoring may be useful in confirming the diagnosis. Patients with NERD suffer similar decrements in quality of life as do patients with erosive esophagitis. Therapy is aimed at eliminating or reducing symptoms and improving quality of life. PPIs are the most effective agents for the treatment of NERD although they are less effective in providing symptom relief than in patients with erosive esophagitis. Laparoscopic antireflux surgery is an effective therapy for selected patients with NERD and outcomes are better when performed in high volume centers.     

Barrett食管、糜烂性食管炎和非糜烂性反流病食管酸暴露及食管动力学分析

目的分析胃食管反流病(GERD)三种亚型Barrett食管(BE)、糜烂性食管炎(EE)和非糜烂性反流病(NERD)患者食管24 h pH监测与高分辨率食管测压结果,探讨不同亚型胃食管反流病食管酸暴露及动力学变化特点。 方法收集2015年12月至2017年12月,新疆维吾尔自治区人民医院接受住院治疗的90例GERD患者的临床资料,其中BE组28例、EE组35例、NERD组27例,通过食管24 h pH监测结果评价患食管酸暴露及反流特点,高分辨率食管测压检查评价食管动力学特点。 结果3组患者年龄及身体质量指数(BMI)等一般资料比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);EE组患者24 h食管pH监测中pH≤4(酸反流)、40.05);3组Demeester评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);LES长度3组无明显差异,BE组LES静息压及残余压较EE组和NERD组稍高,但差异无统计学意义(P均>0.05);3组在食管远端收缩积分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。 结论食管测酸检查在GERD临床亚型的鉴别方面并无显著差别;Barrett食管、糜烂性食管炎、非糜烂性反流病均存在抗反流屏障功能减退,但不同程度的食管粘膜损伤对食管动力学的影响并无差异。     

不同亚型胃食管反流病食管黏膜下层炎症因子变化特点研究

目的分析3种亚型胃食管反流病患者与对照组食管黏膜的组织变化和局部IL-4、IL- 6表达,探讨Th2型炎症因子在胃食管反流病发生发展中的作用。 方法选取2016年12月至2017年12月新疆维吾尔自治区人民医院69例患者临床资料,根据Gerd Q评分和内镜结果将所有入选研究者分为Barrett食管（BE）、糜烂性食管炎（EE）、非糜烂性反流病（NERD）和对照4组,利用食管24 h pH监测法评价胃食管反流病（GERD）患者食管酸暴露及反流特点;通过食管组织HE染色进行组织病理学评分,使用免疫组化法和酶联免疫吸附剂测定法检测食管局部及血清中IL-4、IL-6表达情况。 结果食管24 h pH监测结果中,3亚组间DeMeester指数、弱酸反流次数、反流总事件数比较,差异均无统计学意义（P均>0.05）,NERD组酸反流次数较其余2组低,差异有统计学意义（P均<0.05）;4组样本食管黏膜组织病理学评分中发现,BE组、EE组与其余2组相比均明显升高,差异有统计学意义（P均<0.05）,BE组与EE组评分之间亦有显著差异（P<0.05）,NERD组与对照组间差异不明显;IL-4在4组食管标本中均有不同程度表达,但4组间IL-4阳性率的比较并无显著差异（P均>0.05）;IL-6在NERD组和对照组表达量较低甚至不表达,EE组IL-6阳性率明显高于对照组（P<0.05 ）,但与NERD组间无显著差异,BE组阳性率与对照组和NERD组之间均有明显差异（P均<0.05 ）。 结论GERD食管黏膜上皮组织学炎症等级随食管炎的恶化而升高,其中NERD的食管组织学已出现炎性化趋势,但尚不足以与正常食管区别;IL-4在不同亚型GERD食管黏膜组织中的表达差异不及IL-6显著。     

��������θʳ�ܷ������������Ƶ��о�

目的探讨非糜烂性胃食管反流病不同于反流性食管炎的发病机制。方法选择1996～2004年北京大学人民医院因反酸、胃灼热感等反流症状确诊为胃食管反流病患者57例,按照内镜下食管黏膜有无破损分为非糜烂性胃食管反流病组和反流性食管炎组,比较两组的一般情况、反流症状、是否合并H.pylori(Hp)感染,以及食管动力测定和食管胃24hpH监测结果。结果两组患者年龄、性别、烟酒嗜好等一般情况及合并Hp感染情况比较差异无显著性。非糜烂性胃食管反流病组不典型反流症状(胸骨后痛)的发生率明显高于反流性食管炎组。两组患者都存在病理性酸反流,但两组患者之间酸和(或)碱反流比较无差异。非糜烂性胃食管反流病患者的食管体部各段蠕动波峰值明显高于反流性食管炎患者。非糜烂性胃食管反流病患者卧位胃酸分泌高于反流性食管炎患者。结论非糜烂性胃食管反流病的不典型反流症状发生率更高。在两组发病机制异同上,反流的强弱并非主要因素,重要的是食管防御机制的差别。     

Bowel symptoms in nonerosive gastroesophageal reflux disease: nature, prevalence, and relation to acid reflux

BACKGROUND: Nonerosive gastroesophageal reflux disease (NERD) patients frequently show features of the irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). AIMS: To investigate the prevalence and intensity of bowel symptoms and their relationship to esophageal acid exposure in NERD patients. METHODS: Bowel and reflux symptoms and IBS status were assessed in NERD patients (normal upper endoscopy; esophageal pH <4 for >or= 5% of the time on 24-h pH monitoring; n=326), in relation to nonpatient controls. Bowel symptoms were scored on the 3 scales: diarrhea, constipation, and pain/gas symptoms. RESULTS: NERD and age were independently associated with bowel symptoms. NERD patients scored significantly higher than controls on all bowel scales. In a multivariate analysis, the scores on the pain/gas scale were independently associated with NERD. In NERD patients, reflux symptoms independently predicted the bowel symptoms while acid exposure did not. Forty-nine percent of the NERD patients and 18% of the controls met the criteria for IBS [IBS(+)NERD]. IBS(+)NERD patients scored significantly higher than those not meeting IBS criteria [IBS(-)] on all bowel scales. Yet IBS(-) patients scored significantly higher than controls on the scales of constipation and pain/gas. IBS(+)NERD patients scored higher than IBS(-) also on the GERD symptoms scale. CONCLUSIONS: (1) NERD patients scored significantly higher than controls on all the bowel scales; (2) Bowel symptoms were associated with reflux symptom scores, but not with acid exposure. (3) The presence of IBS features in a large proportion of NERD patients reflects a high prevalence of visceral hypersensitivity that may aggravate acid reflux symptoms.     

Gastroesophageal reflux in cirrhotic patients without esophageal varices

AIM: To evaluate the esophageal motility and abnormal acid and bile reflux incidence in cirrhotic patients without esophageal varices (EV). METHODS: Seventy-eight patients with liver cirrhosis without EV confirmed by upper gastroesophageal endoscopy and 30 healthy control volunteers were prospectively enrolled in this study. All the patients were evaluated using a modified protocol including Child-Pugh score, upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, esophageal manometry, simultaneous ambulatory 24-h esophageal pH ...     

Dilated intercellular spaces of esophageal epithelium in nonerosive reflux disease patients with physiological esophageal acid exposure

OBJECTIVES: It has been demonstrated that dilation of intercellular spaces of esophageal epithelium is a marker of tissue injury in GERD patients with a pathological esophageal acid exposure time. To evaluate the relationship among ultrastructural changes, acid esophageal exposure, and GERD symptoms, intercellular space diameters have been assessed in nonerosive reflux disease (NERD) patients with/without abnormal acid exposure time. METHODS: Following a pharmacological wash-out, 20 NERD patients underwent upper endoscopy, esophageal manometry, and 24-h pH monitoring. Biopsies were taken at 5 cm above the lower esophageal sphincter and intercellular space diameters were measured on transmission electron microscopy photomicrographs. Seven asymptomatic controls underwent the same protocol. RESULTS: Acid exposure time was in the normal range in all controls and in 11 patients (NERD pH-negative); it was abnormal in 9 patients (NERD pH-positive). Mean intercellular space diameter in NERD pH-negative and in NERD pH-positive patients was three times greater than in controls (1.45 and 1.49 microm vs 0.45, p < 0.001). Mean values of maximum intercellular spaces in all NERD patients were greater, two-fold or more, than those in controls (p < 0.001). No difference in mean and maximal space diameters was observed between NERD pH-positive and pH-negative patients. CONCLUSIONS: Dilation of intercellular spaces is a feature of NERD patients, irrespective of esophageal acid exposure, and can be considered an objective, structural marker of GERD symptoms. Impaired esophageal mucosal resistance, even to small amounts of acid refluxate, plays a key role in the pathophysiology of NERD.     

The impact of antireflux surgery on oxidative stress of esophageal mucosa caused by gastroesophageal reflux disease: 4-yr follow-up study

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Oxidative stress to esophageal mucosa plays a key role in the pathogenesis of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), Barrett's esophagus, and adenocarcinoma. We investigated whether successful antireflux surgery eliminates oxidative stress. METHODS: Oxidative stress of esophageal mucosa was measured in 20 GERD patients, before antireflux surgery and 6 and 48 months after it, and compared with normal controls' mucosa (N = 9). Preoperatively, 12 of the 20 had erosive esophagitis or Barrett's metaplasia. Postoperatively, healing of GERD was verified with endoscopy and 24-h pH monitoring. We measured oxidative stress by myeloperoxidase activity (MPA), superoxide dismutase activity, and glutathione content (GSH) in distal esophagus samples from endoscopy. RESULTS: No patient had reflux symptoms after surgery, and pH measurements had normalized. MPA in the distal esophagus decreased (p < 0.05) after successful antireflux surgery, but remained higher than that of controls both 6 months and 4 yr postoperatively (p < 0.05). At all time-points, MPA was higher in patients with preoperatively detected erosive reflux disease (ERD) as compared to non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) (p < 0.01, p < 0.05, and p < 0.05, respectively). GSH values decreased with time only in NERD. At all time-points, GSH levels in distal esophagus were lower than control levels. CONCLUSIONS: Antireflux surgery can heal macroscopic esophagitis but cannot fully reverse the oxidative stress (as reflected by MPA and GSH) upon the distal esophageal mucosa.     

Nonobstructive Dysphagia in Reflux Esophagitis

Dysphagia in the absence of organic esophageal stricture may occur in patients with reflux esophagitis. Although the exact mechanism of this "nonobstructive dysphagia" (NOD) is not known, it is believed to be related to transient segmental esophageal motor disorder. The goals of this study were to determine the frequency of NOD in patients with reflux esophagitis and correlate it with esophageal pH and motility changes. Sixty-three consecutive patients with symptoms of esophageal dysfunction were studied with endoscopy, infusion esophageal manometry, and 24-h ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring. Forty-seven had severe erosive esophagitis unresponsive to medical therapy; 16 with esophageal motility disorders were used as symptomatic controls. Twenty-eight of 63 patients studied experienced NOD during the 24-h pH study; 22 had esophagitis and six had esophageal dysmotility without esophagitis. NOD was noted with similar frequency in the two groups; 22/47 (46.8%) of patients with esophagitis and 6/16 (37.5%) with esophageal dysmotility experienced NOD during the period of study. NOD correlated with pH less than 4.0 in 88.6% of patients with esophagitis but in only 7% of patients with esophageal dysmotility (p less than 0.001). There was no difference in acid reflux patterns in esophagitis patients who experienced NOD (22/47), and in those who did not (25/47). There was no correlation between NOD and baseline esophageal motility abnormalities. In summary, 1) NOD is a common, intermittent symptom that occurred in up to 46.8% of esophagitis patients and 37.5% of symptomatic controls during the 24-h period of this study; 2) NOD correlates with esophageal pH less than 4.0 in patients with esophagitis and not in patients with esophageal dysmotility. These data strongly suggest that acid in the distal esophagus frequently triggers the sensation of dysphagia in esophagitis patients, but not in patients with esophageal motility disorders. Combined ambulatory intraesophageal motility and pH monitoring may further elucidate the mechanism of dysphagia in these patients.     

反流性食管炎与非糜烂性反流病食管酸暴露的特点比较

目的　比较反流性食管炎 (RE)与非糜烂性反流病 (NERD)各亚组食管酸暴露特点。方法　具有典型反酸 烧心等症状的 12 8例患者 ,经胃镜等系统检查诊断为胃食管反流病 (GERD)。便携式 pH监测仪行胃食管 2 4hpH监测 ,DeMeester积分≥ 15分为存在病理性酸反流。 结果　 12 8例患者中 ,37例 (2 8 9% )存在RE ,91例 (71 1% )为NERD。pH监测阳性在RE组和NERD组中分别为 2 5例 (6 7 6 % )和 4 6例 (5 0 5 % ) ,差异无统计学意义 ;两组DeMeester积分均值差异亦无统计学意义 (5 3 4 5± 6 2 0 4比 4 0 0 4± 6 1 80 ,P >0 0 5 )。RE组长反流次数显著高于NERD组 (8 16±10 2 7比 3 96± 6 87,P =0 0 0 4 )。以症状指数 >5 0 %为阳性 ,NERD阳性组 (pH值监测异常 )症状指数阳性率显著高于NERD阴性组 (pH值监测正常 ) (43 5 %比 15 6 % ,P <0 0 0 1)。NERD阴性组中具有阳性症状指数的患者 7例 (15 6 % ) ,阴性症状指数者 38例。前者总反流次数及立位反流时间百分比显著高于后者。RE患者中 ,12例 pH监测阴性者食管及胃内pH的中位值显著高于 pH监测阳性者。结论　RE患者长反流发生率高于NERD患者 ;症状的发生与酸反流相关 ;NERD患者根据酸反流与症状关系可分为不同的亚组。RE阴性组可能存在混合反流或胆汁反流