Survival Analysis of Total Hip Arthroplasty for High Hip Dislocation Secondary to Developmental Dysplasia or Septic Arthritis of the Hip

BackgroundThis retrospective study was conducted to know clinical and radiographic outcomes, complication rate, and survival of THA in patients with high hip dislocation secondary to developmental dysplasia(DDH) or septic arthritis of the hip(SSH).MethodsBetween March 2005 and September 2014, there were consecutive series of 53 THAs in patients with a highly dislocated hip secondary to DDH or SSH. Of these, 48 hips (DDH 24 and SSH 24) were reviewed at a mean follow-up of 7.9 years(range, 5.0-14.3 years). The mean age at the time of THA was 39.1 years(range, 18.0-59.0 years).ResultsIntraoperative blood loss, total drainage and blood transfusion amounts, and mean time to greater trochanter union were significantly lower in the DDH group than in the SSH group (P = .001, P = .039 and P = .014, and P = .015, respectively). No significant difference in Kaplan–Meier survivorship was observed between groups (log-rank, P = .343). The survival rates with an endpoint of cup aseptic loosening in cases with a cemented cup at 7.9 and 10 years (68.1% and 60.5%, respectively) were significantly lower than those in cementless cup cases (100%) at the same checkpoints (P = .019)..ConclusionWe found similar clinical outcomes between the DDH and SSH groups. However, due to poor bone quality and a lack of containment, cementless acetabular cups could not be performed in more than 50% of patients. Our experience shows that revision cementless fixation cup was possible due to reconstitution of the acetabulum in cases with failed cemented fixation.     

An Initial Experience with Hip Resurfacing Versus Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty

Background

Hip resurfacing is an alternative to total hip arthroplasty.

Questions/Purpose

We aimed to compare an experienced hip surgeon’s initial clinical results of hip resurfacing with a new cementless total hip arthroplasty (THA).

Methods

The first 55 consecutive hip resurfacing arthroplasties were compared to 100 consecutive cementless THAs using a cylindrical tapered femoral stem. The learning curve between the two procedures was compared utilizing the incidence of reoperation, complications, Harris Hip Scores (HHS), and implant survivorship.

Results

The reoperation rate was significantly higher (p = 0.019) for hip resurfacing (14.5%) versus THA (4%). The overall complication rate between the two groups was not significantly different (p = 0.398). Preoperative HHS were similar between the two groups (p = 0.2). The final mean HHS was similar in both the resurfacing and THA groups (96 vs. 98.3, respectively, p < 0.65). Kaplan–Meier survival analysis with an endpoint of reoperation suggests complications occurred earlier in the resurfacing group versus the THA group (log-rank test, p = 0.007).

Conclusions

In comparison to our initial experience with a cementless THA stem, operative complications occur earlier and more often after hip resurfacing during the learning period. The clinical outcomes in both groups however are similar at 5 year follow-up.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11420-013-9333-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.     

Stair Ascending and Descending in Hip Resurfacing and Large Head Total Hip Arthroplasty Patients

Large head total hip arthroplasty (THA) and hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA) are alternatives to standard THA that generally have head sizes larger than 36 mm. This study examined 20 patients (10 large head THA and 10 HRA), at an average of 18 months postoperatively, and 15 healthy control subjects during stair negotiation. Hip kinetic and kinematic variables and ground reaction forces were measured. The THA and HRA groups ascended the stairs with increased peak hip flexion angles and decreased hip extension angles as compared with controls. The operative groups also descended the stairs with decreased hip flexion moments. No differences between the operative groups were observed. Eighteen months postoperatively, patients with large head THA or HRA display abnormal flexion and extension during a physically-demanding task.     

Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty for Ankylosing Spondylitis

We compared the results of the metal-on-metal hip resurfacing with the ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty (THA) in 2 groups. The preoperative and postoperative ranges of motion (ROMs) were recorded. At the latest follow-up, both of the groups make satisfactory clinical and radiographic results. There was no significant difference in Harris hip score of the 2 groups, but the ROM of the hips in hip resurfacing group was significantly wider than THA group (P < .01). Hip resurfacing has better ROM improvement than THA, with the same pain relief. Its high stability and low dislocation rate allow patients to do early function exercises, which is important for ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients to avoid reankylosis. Hip resurfacing may be a reasonable option for young AS population.     

Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty With a Spongy Metal Surface Acetabular Component for Hip Dysplasia

We evaluated the clinical and radiographic results of primary total hip arthroplasty for 81 dysplastic hips (71 patients) using cementless Spongiosa Metal II cups (ESKA Implants, Lübeck, Germany). The mean follow-up period was 6.4 years (minimum 5 years), and the preoperative mean Japanese Orthopaedic Association hip score had improved from 45.2 to 87.4 points at the latest follow-up. The radiographic outcome was no aseptic loosening in all 81 hips. The hip center was located significantly more superior than in the contralateral normal hip in 45 patients, but the difference was less than 10 mm; however, there was no significant difference in the lateral position of the hip center. The use of a Spongiosa Metal II cup for dysplastic hips provided satisfactory 5- to 10-year clinical and radiographic results.     

A Systematic Review of Modern Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Resurfacing vs Standard Total Hip Arthroplasty in Active Young Patients

This systematic review compared 2 treatments for hip disease in active young patients: modern metal-on-metal total hip resurfacing and standard total hip arthroplasty. We conducted a literature search to identify relevant randomized and clinical controlled trials and included 968 patients from 4 trials in our analysis. Our results indicated increased rates of revision, femoral neck fractures, and component loosening among patients who received modern metal-on-metal hip resurfacing. No significant differences in the rates of mortality, dislocation, or deep hip joint infection were found between treatment groups. Hip function scores were similar between the 2 groups, but the resurfacing group showed higher activity levels. These results have provided insufficient evidence to determine whether modern metal-on-metal total hip resurfacing offers clinical advantages over standard total hip arthroplasty.     

Accurate Acetabular Component Orientation After Total Hip Arthroplasty Using an Acetabular Alignment Guide

Between February 2005 and August 2006, we recorded acetabular component orientation in 90 patients (100 hips) who underwent primary total hip arthroplasty (THA), to determine whether using an alignment guide ensures accurate acetabular positioning. In the alignment-guide group (46 patients; 48 hips), a guide was placed on the pelvis, a Kirschner wire (K-wire) was attached to the guide, and orientation of the acetabular component was confirmed by both the surgeon and an assistant. In the control group (44 patients; 52 hips), a K-wire was not used and the angle was confirmed by the surgeon alone. Radiographic acetabular component inclination and anteversion and computed tomography anteversion were determined. There was no significant difference in mean component orientation between the 2 groups. However, the SD was significantly smaller in the alignment-guide group, showing that consistent acetabular component orientation in primary THA is highly reproducible when an acetabular alignment guide with an attached K-wire is used.     

A Safe Zone for Acetabular Component Position in Metal-On-Metal Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty: Winner of the 2012 HAP PAUL Award

A safe zone for acetabular component positioning in hip resurfacing (RAIL: Relative Acetabular Inclination Limit) was calculated based on implant size and acetabular inclination angle (AIA). For AIA below the RAIL, there were no adverse wear failures or dislocations, and only 1% of cases with ion levels above 10 μg/L. Other than high inclination angle and small bearing size, female gender was the only other factor that correlated with high ion levels in the multivariate analysis. Seven hundred sixty-one hip resurfacing cases are included in this study. The UCLA activity score, femoral shaft angle, body mass index, weight, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, combined range of motion, diagnosis, age, gender, implant brand, AIA, bearing size, and duration of implantation were analyzed to determine the potential risk factors for elevated metal ion levels. These findings apply to sub hemispheric metal-on-metal bearings with similar coverage arcs as the Biomet and Corin hip resurfacing brands. Additional problems may occur when these bearings are connected with trunions on stems for total hip arthroplasty.     

Medium-Term Results of Cementation of a Highly Cross-Linked Polyethylene Liner Into a Well-Fixed Acetabular Shell in Revision Hip Arthroplasty

The present study was undertaken to document outcomes of cementation of a highly cross-linked polyethylene (PE) liner into a well-fixed acetabular metal shell in 36 hips. All operations were performed by a single surgeon using only one type of liner. Patients were followed for a mean of 6.1 years (range, 3–8 years). Mean Harris hip score improved from 58 points preoperatively to 91 points postoperatively. There were no cases of PE liner dislodgement or progressive osteolysis. 1 hip (2.8%) required revision surgery for acetabular cup loosening with greater trochanteric fracture. Complications included 1 peroneal nerve palsy and 1 dislocation. The results of this study and previous reports demonstrated that cementation of highly cross-linked PE liner into well-fixed metal shell could provide good midterm durability.     

One-Component Revision of Failed Hip Resurfacing from Adverse Reaction to Metal Wear Debris

This study assessed the results of 90 one-component revisions for failed hip resurfacing due to adverse reaction to metal wear debris (76 acetabular, 14 femoral). Patients with a femoral head size 40–45 mm (n = 33) received a two-piece titanium meshed shell with a cross-linked polyethylene liner and patients with femoral head size 46–54 mm (n = 43) received metal-on-metal components. Patients with femoral head size > 45 mm who wished a metal-polyethylene bearing received a dual mobility femoral prosthesis. The mean follow-up was 61 months and the procedure was successful in 97% of the patients. Three failures required re-revision; there was one deep infection. There were no dislocations. One-component revision is a reasonable alternative to revision to total hip arthroplasty.     

Long-Term Outcome of a Metal-on-Polyethylene Cementless Hip Resurfacing

Due to the well-documented problems surrounding metal-on-metal bearings, the use of hip resurfacing has declined. Since the potential benefits of hip resurfacing remain desirable, it may be beneficial to investigate the long-term outcome of hip resurfacings using metal-on-polyethylene in the 1980’s. We report the long-term survivorship and modes of failure of a cementless metal-on-polyethylene resurfacing (n = 178) with different porous ingrowth surfaces. While acetabular loosening was absent, a high incidence of femoral failures (femoral loosening = 18.1%, osteolytic neck fracture = 21%) occurred despite using the same ingrowth surface for both components. Ongoing developments using the lessons learned from these previous generation components and utilizing modern low wear materials, e.g., cross-linked polyethylene, may lead to improved implants for future hip resurfacings.     

Acetabular Reconstruction With the Medial Protrusio Technique for Complex Primary and Revision Total Hip Arthroplasties

Background

In the setting of acetabular deficiency during total hip arthroplasty (THA), the medial protrusio technique (MPT) allows for increased component coverage while avoiding excessive component abduction or elevation of the hip center. The technique involves controlled reaming through the medial acetabular wall while maintaining the continuity of the anterior and posterior columns. The purpose of this study is to analyze the results of the largest reported series to date of primary and revision THAs using the MPT.

Effect of Acetabular Reinforcement Ring With Hook for Acetabular Dysplasia Clarified by Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis

The objective of this study was to biomechanically determine the effect of the severity of acetabular dysplasia, number and positions of screws and type of bone graft material used on the initial fixation strength of the acetabular reinforcement ring with hook (Ganz ring) using the finite element method. Relative micromotion increased as the severity of acetabular dysplasia increased and tended to decrease as the number of screws increased, but varied according to screw placement position. Increased strength of the bone graft material led to decreased relative micromotion. Biomechanically, the Ganz ring can be placed securely using 3 screws in patients with Crowe 1 dysplasia. However, in patients with Crowe 2 or higher dysplasia, it is necessary to spread at least 4 screws across an area of good host bone.     

Changes in Bone Mineral Density of the Acetabulum and Proximal Femur After Total Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty

Our aim was to investigate the changes in bone mineral density (BMD) of acetabulum and proximal femur after total hip resurfacing arthroplasty. A comparative study was carried out on 51 hips in 48 patients. Group A consisted of 25 patients (26 hips) who had undergone total hip resurfacing and group B consisted of 23 patients (25 hips) who had had large-diameter metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty (THA). BMDs around the acetabulum and proximal femur were measured using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) at 2 weeks, 6 months, 1 year and annually thereafter during the 3 years after surgery. At final follow-up, the acetabular net mean BMD decreased by 11% in group A and 10% in group B with no differences between two groups (P = .35). For the femoral side, in Gruen zone 1, the mean BMD increased by 4% in group A, whereas it decreased by 11% in group B (P = .029). In Gruen zone 7, the mean BMD increased by 8% at the final follow-up in group A, whereas it decreased by 13% in group B (P = .02). In both groups the mean BMD increased by 3% in Gruen zones 3, 4, 5, and 6. Stress-related bone loss of the acetabulum was comparable for MOM THA and resurfacing devices, but proximal femoral bone density increased in the resurfacing group and decreased in the THA group.     

Periacetabular Bone Mineral Density Changes After Resurfacing Hip Arthroplasty Versus Conventional Total Hip Arthroplasty. A Randomized Controlled DEXA Study

A randomized controlled trial was performed to evaluate acetabular bone mineral density (BMD) changes after hip resurfacing (RHA) versus an established conventional total hip arthroplasty (THA). A total of 71 patients were allocated randomly to receive either an RHA press-fit cobalt–chromium cup (n = 38) or a THA with a threaded titanium cup and polyethylene-metal-inlay insert (n = 33). The BMD in five separate periacetabular regions of interest (ROI) was prospectively quantified preoperative until 24 months. We conclude that, in contrast to our hypothesis, periacetabular BMD was better preserved after RHA than after placement of a conventional THA. Long term follow-up studies are necessary to see whether this benefit in bone preservation sustains over longer time periods and whether it is turned into clinical benefits at future revision surgery.     

全髋关节表面置换术治疗成人髋关节发育不良25例中期随访

目的探讨全髋关节表面置换术（total hip resurfacing arthroplasty,THRA）治疗成人髋关节发育不良（developmental dysplasia of the hip,DDH）继发骨关节炎的中期疗效。方法2005年3月至2006年6月,采用THRA治疗DDH患者25例,女18例,男7例;30～59岁,平均48岁;双髋1例,共26髋。根据Hartofilakidis分型,半脱位22髋,低位脱位4髋。采用Conserve-plus金属对金属全髋关节表面置换假体,髋臼假体为非骨水泥固定,股骨头假体采用低黏骨水泥固定。临床随访采用Harris评分,测量髋臼外展角、垂直距离、水平距离、股骨柄干角、髋臼假体覆盖率;记录髋臼和股骨假体周围透亮线及骨溶解;以各种原因所致翻修或影像学松动为随访终点。结果所有患者均随访3年以上,平均随访3.5年。截至随访终点无翻修或影像学松动。患者的Harris评分由术前平均46分提高至术后平均92.1分,26髋均为优。术后轻度跛行2例,所有患者均无迟发感染、术后股骨颈骨折、术后残余股骨头坏死、术后假体松动、脱位、术后异位骨化。髋关节活动度：屈曲由97.5°增加至127.5°,外展由19.3°增加至40°,外旋由23.2°增加至42.5°,内旋由4.2°增加至28.5°。X线片显示：关节假体位置正常,髋臼假体平均外展角为41.6°,髋关节旋转中心位置平均下移6.2 mm、内移15 mm,股骨柄干角平均146.4°。宿主骨对臼杯的平均覆盖率为94.4%,1例宿主骨与臼杯界面在2区出现透亮线,宿主骨与股骨假体柄界面无一例出现透亮线。结论THRA治疗成人半脱位型及低位脱位型DDH继发骨关节炎具有良好的中期疗效,熟练的手术技术和正确的适应证选择是降低中远期并发症的关键。     

Five Year Results of the First US FDA-Approved Hip Resurfacing Device

A prospective, multi-center postmarket approval study has been ongoing since May 2006 to assess safety and efficacy of the first US FDA approved hip resurfacing implant. 265 patients have been enrolled at five study sites. The average age of the patients is 51.3 years. There have been 7 revisions (2.4%) in the cohort to date. K–M survival curves for the cohort are 97.6% at 5 years. There is a trend toward a gender difference in implant survivorship, with 98.6% of men and 94.7% of women free from revision. Metal ion analysis revealed median cobalt and chromium levels of 1.5 ppb and 1.7 ppb at 1 year. In this prospective US study, the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing implant is demonstrating results comparable to those in the literature.     

Computerized Range of Motion Analysis Following Dual Mobility Total Hip Arthroplasty,Traditional Total Hip Arthroplasty,and Hip Resurfacing

Newer arthroplasty designs claim to provide superior range of motion (ROM) and greater stability than their predecessors. However, there is no way to compare ROM of implant systems in an equivalent anatomical environment in a clinical setting. This study used computer-aided design to compare ROM after hip resurfacing, 28 mm THA, 36 mm THA, and anatomic dual mobility (ADM) THA in 3D models of 5 cadaver pelvises. ROM to impingement was then tested in 10 different motions and a one-way ANOVA was used to compare results. The hip resurfacing resulted in restricted ROM compared to the other 3 models in all motions except adduction. The ADM, 36 mm, and 28 mm THA resulted in similar ROM. Dual mobility constructs provide comparable ROM in patients where large head THA is not appropriate.     

Cup Anteversion in Hip Resurfacing: Validation of EBRA and the Presentation of a Simple Clinical Grading System

The use of large metal on metal bearings has led to a reduction in the risk of dislocation post hip arthroplasty. Because of this, and also because of the technical difficulties associated with resurfacing surgery in particular, it could be argued that a less meticulous approach to acetabular cup placement has developed in comparison with conventional metal on polyethylene arthroplasty. Resurfacing cups may produce significant clinical problems when placed at the extremes of version, including increased production of metal debris and psoas tendonitis. Presented in this article is evidence that EBRA software (Einzel-Bild-Roentgen-Analysis, University of Innsbruck, Austria) can be used to reliably assess the version of resurfacing cups, when radiographs are of sufficient quality. The cups have characteristic appearances when placed at the extremes of version. These characteristics can allow the surgeon to identify poorly positioned cups without the use of software.     

Comparison of Surgical Outcomes Between Standard and Elevated-Rim Highly Cross-Linked Polyethylene Acetabular Liners in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty With Minimum 15-Year Follow-Up: Single-Center,Retrospective Cohort Study

BackgroundThe aims of the present study are to (1) conduct the longest-to-date follow-up wear analysis of the highly cross-linked polyethylene acetabular liners, (2) assess the incidence of femoral and acetabular osteolysis, and (3) compare the surgical outcomes between standard and elevated-rim acetabular liners in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA).MethodsIn this retrospective cohort study, we evaluated 112 primary THAs performed by a single experienced arthroplasty surgeon at our institution between March 2000 and December 2003. Patients were classified based on the type of acetabular liner used: standard or elevated-rim liner. For evaluation of surgical outcomes, the following data were collected: acetabular cup position (anteversion and inclination), wear rate (linear and volumetric), presence of osteolysis, history of reoperation (all-cause and wear-related), complications (deep joint infection, dislocation, and periprosthetic fracture), and Harris hip score at last follow-up.ResultsLinear and volumetric wear rates were 0.028 mm/y (0.000-0.145 mm/y) and 11.641 mm³/y (0.000-70.000 mm³/y) in the standard group and 0.026 mm/y (0.000-0.094mm/y) and 9.706 mm³/y (0.000-33.000 mm³/y) in the elevated-rim group, respectively. These rates were not significantly different between groups. One case of osteolysis was confirmed in the standard group, whereas no osteolysis was observed in the elevated-rim group.ConclusionWe suggest that elevated-rim highly cross-linked polyethylene acetabular liners might be a good implant option that can be used safely.