Patient Perceptions Regarding Outpatient Hip and Knee Arthroplasties

Background

There has been increasing interest in outpatient total joint arthroplasty (TJA) in the orthopedic community, but how patients feel about outpatient TJA is unknown. The purpose of this study was to understand patient perspectives on hip and knee replacements performed in an outpatient setting.

The Influence of the Implant Size on the Outcome of Unconstrained Total Knee Arthroplasty

Introduction: The influence of implant size on the results in unconstrained total knee arthroplasty has never been investigated before.

Patients and methods: 133 patients with unconstrained total knee arthroplasty were examined (HSS Score, Knee Society Score) with consideration of the different sizes of femoral and tibial components and the thicknesses of the tibial inlays. The medium follow up was 41.2 months (8 months to 74 months).

Results: Although the different component sizes gained different results, the differences were not significant. The combination of two component sizes did not lead to a significant change of the results. The results of the Knee Society Score seemed to become worse with thinner polyethylene tibial inlays although these differences were not significant. Conclusions: In conclusion, implant size had no significant influence on the outcome of total knee arthroplasty. The combination of two implant sizes showed no disadvantage.     

Epidemiology of Primary Hip and Knee Arthroplasties in Germany: 2004 to 2008

The objective of this study was to describe the trend in utilization of primary joint arthroplasties in Germany. Between 2004 and 2008, the number of total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) increased faster than that of total hip arthroplasties (THAs). In 2008, 159 000 primary THAs and 146 000 primary TKAs were performed. This represented a 15% increase in THAs and a 33% increase in TKAs compared to 2004. The annual increase in number of surgeries was 4 500 for THAs and 9,000 for TKAs. Although older adults remained the main recipients of joint arthroplasties, incidence rate increased faster in non-elderly(18–64 years) compared with elderly (≥ 65 years) in both THAs and TKAs. Obesity, more strongly associated with TKAs than with THAs, could be a contributor to the recent steeper growth in TKAs in Germany.     

Extremely Low Transfusion Rates: Contemporary Primary Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasties

Background

Considerable blood loss which requires transfusion is frequently reported after total hip and knee arthroplasties (THA and TKA). The purpose of this study is to review the transfusion rates in contemporary THA and TKA with optimized perioperative protocols including minimized surgical trauma and optimal perioperative patient care.

Revision Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasties After Solid Organ Transplant

Background

As solid organ transplant (SOT) patients' survival improves, the number undergoing total hip (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is increasing. Accordingly, the number of revision procedures in this higher-risk group is also increasing. The goals of this study were to identify the most common failure mechanisms, associated complications, clinical outcomes, and patient survivorship of SOT patients after revision THA or TKA.

Preoperative Risk Factors for Postoperative Urinary Tract Infection After Primary Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasties

BackgroundEstablishing clear risk factors for complications such as urinary tract infection (UTI) after arthroplasty procedures helps guide clinical practice and provides more information to both surgeons and patients. This study aims to assess selected preoperative patient characteristics as risk factors for postoperative UTI after primary total hip and knee arthroplasties (THA and TKA).MethodsThis was a retrospective analysis using current procedural terminology codes to investigate the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database for patients who underwent THA or TKA from 2010 to 2017. Patients were classified for UTI by NSQIP guidelines. Patient samples with all possible covariates were included for multivariate logistic regression analysis and assessed for independent associations.ResultsIn a cohort of 983 identified patients (983 of 119,096; 0.83%): ages 57+ years, preoperative red blood cell (RBC) transfusion, perioperative RBC transfusion, bleeding disorders, operative time 110+ minutes, preoperative steroid use, diabetes, pulmonary comorbidities, body mass index 30+ kg/m² were independent risk factors for postoperative UTI after THA. In a cohort of 1503 identified patients (1503 of 189,327; 0.8%): ages 60+ years, preoperative RBC transfusion, perioperative RBC transfusion, anemia, platelets less than 150k, preoperative steroid use, diabetes, and body mass index 30+ kg/m² were independent risk factors for postoperative UTI after TKA. Male sex was associated with a decreased risk of UTI in both THA and TKA.ConclusionThis study provides novel evidence on risk factors associated with the development of UTI after THA or TKA. Clinicians should be aware of risk factors in the manifestation of postoperative UTI after primary THA or TKA procedures.     

Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasties Are Highly Cost-Effective Procedures: The Importance of Duration of Follow-Up

BackgroundTotal hip and knee arthroplasties (THA/TKA) are clinically effective but high cost procedures. The aim of this study is to perform a cost-effectiveness analysis of THA and TKA in the New Zealand (NZ) healthcare system.MethodsData were collected from 713 patients undergoing THA and 520 patients undergoing TKA at our local public hospital. SF-6D utility values were obtained from participants preoperatively and 1-year postoperatively, and deaths and any revision surgeries from patient records and the New Zealand Joint Registry at minimum 8-year follow-up. A continuous-time state-transition simulation model was used to estimate costs and health gains to 15 years. Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), treatment costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated to determine cost effectiveness. ICERs below NZ gross domestic product (GDP; NZ$60 600) and 0.5 times GDP per capita were considered “cost effective” and “highly cost effective” respectively.ResultsCumulative health gains were 2.8 QALYs (THA) and 2.3 QALYs (TKA) over 15 years. Cost effectiveness improved from ICERs of NZ$74,400 (THA) and NZ$93,000 (TKA) at 1 year to NZ$6000 (THA) and NZ$7500 (TKA) at 15 years. THA and TKA were cost effective after 2 years and highly cost effective after 3 years. QALY gains and cost effectiveness were greater in patients with worse preoperative functional status and younger age.ConclusionTHA and TKA are highly cost-effective procedures over longer term horizons. Although preoperative status and age were associated with cost effectiveness, both THA and TKA remained cost effective in patients with less severe preoperative scores and older ages.     

Bilateral Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasties: Average 10-Year Follow-Up

Background

The present study investigates the clinical and radiographic outcomes in patients with all 4 major lower extremity joints replaced.

The Impact of Surgical Technique on Patient Reported Outcome Measures and Early Complications After Total Hip Arthroplasty

Background

This study examines patient and surgeon reported outcome measures, complications during index admission, length of stay (LOS), and discharge disposition in a series of total hip replacements (THR) performed via the direct anterior (DA) or posterolateral (PL) approach.

The Effect of Povidone-Iodine Lavage in Preventing Infection After Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasties: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BackgroundDilute povidone-iodine (PI) lavage, a simple disinfection method, could reduce postoperative infection risk. However, there is no clinical consensus regarding its efficacy in total joint arthroplasties (TJAs). This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated PI lavage’s efficacy in preventing infection after TJA.MethodsMEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched for studies published before November 22, 2019, that compared postoperative infection rates in patients who underwent TJA with or without PI lavage before wound closure. Subgroup analyses were designed to identify the differences in infection site (overall or deep), type of surgery (total hip arthroplasty or total knee arthroplasty), time until diagnosis of infection (3 or 12 months postoperatively), and primary/aseptic revision arthroplasties.ResultsWe included 7 studies with 31,213 TJA cases, comprising 8861 patients who received PI lavage and 22,352 who did not. Pooled odds ratio for overall infection rate for the PI and non-PI lavage groups was 0.67 (95% confidence interval, 0.38-1.19, P = .17) and for the deep infection rate was 0.90 (95% confidence interval, 0.27-2.98, P = .86). Subgroup analyses revealed no differences in postoperative infection rates between the PI and non-PI lavage groups in terms of total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty, diagnosis of infection at 3 and 12 months postoperatively, or primary and aseptic revision arthroplasties.ConclusionWe detected no differences in the overall postoperative infection rates between the PI and non-PI lavage groups before wound closure in TJA including all studies in the subgroup analyses.     

Use of Knotless Suture for Closure of Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasties : A Prospective,Randomized Clinical Trial

We performed a prospective, randomized clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy of using a bidirectional barbed suture compared with traditional sutures in the deep closure of primary total hip (25) and knee (35) arthroplasties. Complications, time to closure, and length of surgery were evaluated. Closure was noted to be significantly faster (9.3 vs 13.6 minutes, P < .005) in the barbed suture group. Wound-related complications were similar (3 cases) in both groups at 3-month follow-up. Although this study supports the use of barbed technology as a functionally comparable and more efficient modality of wound closure with the potential for costs savings based on reduced operative time, the cost-effectiveness of its adoption is institution dependent and will rely on the optimization of all other perioperative factors.     

Validation of the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Pain and Function Subscales for Use in Total Hip Replacement and Total Knee Replacement Clinical Trials

BackgroundTotal hip replacement (THR)/total knee replacement (TKR) studies do not uniformly measure patient centered domains, pain, and function. We aim to validate existing measures of pain and function within subscales of standard instruments to facilitate measurement.MethodsWe evaluated baseline and 2-year pain and function for THR and TKR using Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS)/Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), with primary unilateral TKR (4796) and THR (4801). Construct validity was assessed by correlating HOOS/KOOS pain and activities of daily living (ADL), function quality of life (QOL), and satisfaction using Spearman correlation coefficients. Patient relevant thresholds for change in pain and function were anchored to improvement in QOL; minimally clinically important difference (MCID) corresponded to “a little improvement” and a really important difference (RID) to a “moderate improvement.” Pain and ADL function scores were compared by quartiles using Kruskal-Wallis.ResultsTwo-year HOOS/KOOS pain and ADL function correlated with health-related QOL (KOOS pain and Short Form 12 Physical Component Scale ρ = 0.54; function ρ = 0.63). Comparing QOL by pain and function quartiles, the highest levels of pain relief and function were associated with the most improved QOL. MCID for pain was estimated at ≥20, and the RID ≥29; MCID for function ≥14, and the RID ≥23. The measures were responsive to change with large effect sizes (≥1.8).ConclusionWe confirm that HOOS/KOOS pain and ADL function subscales are valid measures of critical patient centered domains after THR/TKR, and achievable thresholds anchored to improved QOL. Cost-free availability and brevity makes them feasible, to be used in a core measurement set in total joint replacement trials.     

Routine Postoperative Complete Blood Counts Are Not Necessary After Most Primary Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasties

BackgroundRoutine postoperative complete blood count tests are commonplace after total joint arthroplasty. The goal of this study was to identify if these result in any clinically meaningful action and if it would be safe to forego this testing in a population without known risk factors for transfusion.MethodsA retrospective review of 1060 patients undergoing a total knee or total hip arthroplasty at a single institution was performed. Data points including patient demographics, preoperative and postoperative laboratory results, tranexamic acid use, preoperative and postoperative medication for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis and anticoagulation, as well as 90-day readmission related to anemia were collected.ResultsThe transfusion rate for all patients was 0.66% (7/1060) and there was only one transfusion for a patient with a preoperative hemoglobin (Hb) greater than 12 g/dL (1/976; 0.1%). There was no difference in the change from preoperative to postoperative day 1 Hb levels in patients treated with aspirin compared with those on direct oral anticoagulation (P = .73). There were no 90-day readmissions related to acute blood loss anemia.ConclusionsThis study demonstrates that routine postoperative complete blood count testing is not absolutely necessary and does not provide additional value in the vast majority of patients with preoperative Hb levels equal to or greater than 12 g/dL when tranexamic acid is administered. This could avoid unnecessary testing in patients and increased savings to the health care system.Level of EvidenceLevel 3, retrospective cohort.     

Knee Scores of Patients with Non‐Lateral Compartmental Knee Osteoarthritis Undergoing Mobile,Fixed‐Bearing Unicompartmental Knee and Total Knee Arthroplasties: A Randomized Controlled Trial

ObjectiveTo evaluate knee scores and clinical efficacies of patients with non‐lateral unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis (OA) who randomly underwent mobile‐bearing (MB) unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA), fixed‐bearing (FB) UKA, and total knee arthroplasty (TKA).MethodsFrom September 2015 to February 2017, a prospective, randomized, parallel, single‐center trial of 180 patients (78 males and 102 females; 63.3 ± 6.9 years) with non‐lateral compartmental knee OA was performed in the first author‐affiliated hospital. The patients were randomly divided into three groups (each group included 60 patients) and received medial cemented Oxford phase 3 MB UKA, medial cemented Link FB UKA, or cemented DePuy Sigma PFC TKA, respectively. A similar perioperative management and fast‐track surgery program was carried out for all patients. The knee scores at 3‐year follow‐up after operation and clinical efficacies of these three groups of patients were recorded, investigated, and compared.ResultsPrimarily, compared to the TKA group, the UKA groups (MB UKA and FB UKA) had shorter operative time (median 63.2 < 67.1 min), less bleeding (8.6 < 30.0 mL), earlier resumption of walking without crutches (3.0 < 8.0 days) and walking up and down the stairs (5.0 < 10.0 days) (P < 0.001), higher FJS scores (78.0 > 74.5) (P = 0.007), better results in all knee scores (except VAS and KSS function scores) (P < 0.05), and a larger maximum flexion angle of the knee at the 3‐year follow‐up (123.0° > 96.0°) (P = 0.001). Secondarily, compared to the TKA group, the MB UKA group showed better results in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities index (WOMAC) stiffness (83.6 > 79.6), WOMAC total (86.3 > 83.2), Oxford knee score (OKS) (20.0 < 23.0), Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) (78.5 > 74.5), and a larger maximum flexion angle of the knee (123.0 > 96.0) (P < 0.05). Moreover, the FB UKA group showed higher Hospital for Special Surgery Knee Score (HSS) (91.0 > 88.5), WOMAC stiffness (84.3 > 79.6), WOMAC function (85.2 > 81.7), WOMAC total scores (87.6 > 83.2), and a larger maximum flexion angle of the knee (119.0° > 96.0°) than the TKA group (P < 0.05). Overall, there was no significant difference in all knee scores and maximum flexion angles of the knee for the MB UKA and FB UKA groups (P > 0.05). There was one case with original bearing dislocation in MB UKA group. One patient with displacement of the femoral component caused by a fall injury, and another patient, who lost his life in a car accident, were involved in the FB UKA group. There was an infection case and an intermuscular vein thrombosis case in TKA group.ConclusionUKA showed more advantages than TKA; however, there was no significant difference between the MB UKA and FB UKA groups for treatment of non‐lateral compartmental knee OA.     

Drivers of the Variation in Prosthetic Implant Purchase Prices for Total Knee and Total Hip Arthroplasties

Background

Previous studies have documented wide variation in health care spending and prices; however, the causes for the variation in supply purchase prices across providers are not well understood. The purpose of this study was to determine the drivers of variation in prosthetic implant purchase prices for primary total knee and hip arthroplasties (TKA and THA, respectively) across providers.

The Clinical Outcome of Different Total Knee Arthroplasty Designs in One-Stage Revision for Periprosthetic Infection

BackgroundDespite the growing number of studies reporting on the best surgical treatment in the management of periprosthetic joint infection, there are no robust data regarding the type of infected prosthesis before any kind of exchange arthroplasty. To overcome these shortcomings, we asked the following questions: (1) What is the survivorship of nonhinged and hinged knee implants after one-stage exchange arthroplasty and (2) what is the functional outcome after one-stage exchange procedure focusing on knee prostheses and the type of prior infected knee implant. In a secondary radiographic analysis, we also investigated if (3) the type of femoral bone morphology measured by the inner femoral diameter influences the rate of aseptic failures also in patients with periprosthetic joint infection.MethodsBetween January 2011 and December 2017, we performed a retrospective designed study including 211 patients with infected knee prostheses. After all, seventy-six percent (161 of 211 patients) were available for final data analysis. These patients were divided into four groups as per the performed implant revision: (1) bicondylar total knee arthroplasty to rotating hinge implant, (2) rotating hinge to rotating hinge implant, (3) rotating hinge to full hinge implant, and (4) full hinge to full hinge implant. The mean follow-up (FU) was six years (range 3 to 9; standard deviation = 1.9), whereas a minimum FU of three years was required for inclusion. Survivorship and group analysis were performed, and the functional outcome was assessed using postoperative Oxford Knee Scores at the latest FU (60-point scale with lower scores representing less pain and greater function). Furthermore, in all cases, femoral bone morphology was determined as per the Citak classification system.ResultsAt the final FU, the overall surgical revision rate was 23% (37/161 patients) with nine percent (15/161 patients) suffering a periprosthetic joint infection relapse. Group 1 consisted of 51, group 2 consisted of 67, group 3 consisted of 24, and group 4 consisted of 19 patients. The lowest overall revision rate was found in group 2 (16%, n = 11), compared with 28% (n = 14) in group 1, 29% (n = 7) in group 3, and 26% (n = 5) in group 4; however, no significant differences were found (P = .902). The functional outcome (Oxford Knee Score) was clinically constant in all groups, with 32 points in group 1, 37 points in group 2, 33 points in group 3, and 35 points in group 4 (P = .107).Concerning the number of patients with aseptic loosening as per bone morphology, 74% (14/19) of all aseptic loosening cases appeared in femoral bone type C morphologies according to Citak (75% in group 1, 56% in group 2, 100% in group 3, and 100% in group 4).ConclusionsThe results obtained suggest a generally high overall revision rate (25%) with a good infection control rate (91%). Although we were unable to work out a specific group of patients with a statistically significant differing outcome, it is interesting to see that hinged implants can reach more or less the same functional outcome and revision rates as nonhinged implants, when it comes to revision surgeries. In this study, a relatively high number of aseptic failures contributed to a high overall revision rate. In this context, the bone morphology, measured as per the Citak classification system, could be confirmed as a risk factor for aseptic failures also in septic patients. Therefore, further research might focus on revision knee implant design.     

Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in Hypophosphatemic Rickets

There is very limited published information about the technical aspects and durability of lower extremity arthroplasty in hypophosphatemic rickets. Between 1972 and 2006, 8 total hip arthroplasties (THAs) and 6 total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) were performed in 8 patients with degenerative arthritis and bone deformity secondary to hypophosphatemic rickets. Two hips required osteotomies at the time of arthroplasty, and 1 TKA patient required postoperative osteotomies. Specialized implants were required in 3 hips and 1 knee. At average follow-up of 7 years, mean Harris hip scores improved to 21 points, and mean Knee Society pain and function scores improved to 48 points and 27 points, respectively. One cemented THA failed due to femoral aseptic loosening at 13 years postoperatively; all other implants remained well fixed. Lower extremity arthroplasty is effective and durable for patients with arthritis associated with hypophosphatemic rickets, but corrective osteotomies and use of special implants should be anticipated with more severe deformities.     

Prediction Models for 30-Day Mortality and Complications After Total Knee and Hip Arthroplasties for Veteran Health Administration Patients With Osteoarthritis

Background

Statistical models to preoperatively predict patients' risk of death and major complications after total joint arthroplasty (TJA) could improve the quality of preoperative management and informed consent. Although risk models for TJA exist, they have limitations including poor transparency and/or unknown or poor performance. Thus, it is currently impossible to know how well currently available models predict short-term complications after TJA, or if newly developed models are more accurate. We sought to develop and conduct cross-validation of predictive risk models, and report details and performance metrics as benchmarks.

Modification of the Harris Hip Score in acetabular fracture treatment

The aim of this study was to adjust the Harris Hip Score for evaluation of acetabular fracture treatment. The discriminating quality of the score was assessed. As there was low discriminating capacity at the upper end of the scale, with a high ceiling effect and the 60th percentile showing top points, the score was modified and re-evaluated. The discrimination of the modified score was improved, with the 90th percentile giving top points. Differences in treatment outcome of acetabular fractures will be easier to detect with the modified score.     

Satisfaction With the Process vs Outcome of Care in Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty

BackgroundPatient satisfaction, with both process of care and outcome of care, is critical for measuring the quality and value of elective procedures such as arthroplasty. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the correlation between early postoperative satisfaction with the process of care and 2-year satisfaction with the outcome of care after total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA).MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed data from institutional arthroplasty registries. Satisfaction with the outcome of care was measured on a scale of 0-100 by a previously validated questionnaire administered 2 years postoperatively. Patient satisfaction with the process of care was measured by the Press Ganey (PG) inpatient survey, also scored 0-100. We examined the correlation between these 2 measures of satisfaction in patients who underwent primary THA or TKA.ResultsIn total, 721 TKA patients and 760 THA patients underwent surgery and completed both the PG survey and 2-year satisfaction questionnaire. The mean age was 65.1 years with a mean body mass index of 28.8 and 56% were female. The mean PG survey score for the entire cohort was 95.6. The mean 2-year satisfaction score was 90.3. The Spearman correlation coefficient between the PG survey and the 2-year satisfaction survey was 0.23 for TKA patients (P < .001) and 0.13 for THA patients (P < .001).ConclusionWe found a weak correlation between the measurement of satisfaction with the process of care surrounding hip and knee arthroplasty using the PG survey and measurement of satisfaction with the outcome of care after arthroplasty using a validated 2-year satisfaction instrument.