Interactions of tazobactam and clavulanate with inducibly- and constitutively-expressed Class I beta-lactamases

Clavulanate and tazobactam (YTR 830) were tested as inhibitors and inducers of the AmpC-type Class I beta-lactamases of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Enterobacter cloacae, Citrobacter freundii, Serratia marcescens, Morganella morganii and the Ic beta-lactamase of Proteus vulgaris. Both clavulanate and tazobactam inhibited the Pr. vulgaris Class Ic beta-lactamase and potentiated ticarcillin and piperacillin against beta-lactamase derepressed variants of this species. Tazobactam, but not clavulanate, also had some ability to inhibit the AmpC Class I enzymes of M. morganii, C. freundii, Ps. aeruginosa, E. cloacae and S. marcescens. The piperacillin + tazobactam combination, unlike ticarcillin + clavulanate, showed some degree of synergy against most derepressed strains of these species. This behaviour partly depended upon the greater inhibitory activity of tazobactam for the enzymes, but also on piperacillin being easier to potentiate than ticarcillin. The synergy between piperacillin and tazobactam was greatest for M. morganii and C. freundii, least for Ps. aeruginosa and E. cloacae. Unfortunately, it is in the last two species that these enzymes pose the greatest resistance threat. Tazobactam caused little or no antagonism of piperacillin against beta-lactamase inducible species, whereas clavulanate antagonized ticarcillin against beta-lactamase inducible strains of E. cloacae and M. morganii (not other species). The antagonism of ticarcillin was attributable to beta-lactamase induction. The lack of antagonism with the tazobactam+piperacillin combination was related to tazobactam being a weaker inducer than clavulanate, not to piperacillin being less susceptible to antagonism than ticarcillin.     

Comparative in vitro activities of piperacillin-tazobactam and ticarcillin-clavulanate.

The in vitro activities of ticarcillin, piperacillin, clavulanic acid, tazobactam, ticarcillin-clavulanate, and piperacillin-tazobactam against 819 bacterial isolates were compared. The two beta-lactamase inhibitors, clavulanic acid and tazobactam, had little useful antibacterial activity but enhanced the activities of the penicillins against beta-lactamase-producing strains of Haemophilus influenzae, Branhamella catarrhalis, and methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus; all strains were susceptible to both combinations. Both enzyme inhibitors also enhanced the activities of the penicillins against most strains of Escherichia coli, Klebsiella spp., Citrobacter diversus, Proteus spp., Providencia spp., and Bacteroides spp. and against occasional strains of Citrobacter freundii, Enterobacter spp., and Serratia marcescens. Clavulanic acid frequently enhanced the activity of ticarcillin against Xanthomonas maltophilia, and tazobactam frequently enhanced the activity of piperacillin against Morganella morganii. Enhancement was observed primarily with strains relatively resistant to the penicillins. In general, clavulanic acid was more effective than tazobactam in enhancing penicillin activity against Klebsiella spp., C. diversus, X. maltophilia, and Bacteroides spp., whereas tazobactam was more effective against Escherichia coli and Proteeae. There was little or no enhancement of activity against Enterococcus faecalis, Aeromonas hydrophila, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Pseudomonas cepacia, or Acinetobacter anitratus. Clavulanic acid occasionally antagonized the activity of ticarcillin against ticarcillin-susceptible members of the family Enterobacteriaceae, but those strains were still considered susceptible to the combination. Tazobactam never antagonized the activity of piperacillin. In a direct comparison of the activities of ticarcillin-clavulanate and piperacillin-tazobactam, the two were equally active against H. influenzae, B. catarrhalis, and S. aureus; the latter was more active against E. faecalis. For relatively susceptible strains of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae, neither combination was predictably more active than the other, but relatively resistant strains were generally more susceptible to piperacillin-tazobactam. Piperacillin-tazobactam was more active than ticarcillin-clavulanate against A. hydrophila, P. aeruginosa, and P. cepacia, similar in activity against A. anitratus, and less active against X. maltophilia and Bacteroides spp.     

Discrepancies between disk diffusion and broth susceptibility studies of the activity of ticarcillin plus clavulanic acid against ticarcillin-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Ticarcillin and clavulanic acid in combination were tested against 40 Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates resistant to ticarcillin by disk diffusion. A total of 21 isolates (53%) were susceptible to ticarcillin-clavulanate by disk diffusion, under currently recommended criteria for ticarcillin susceptibility. Macro-broth dilution tests (ticarcillin plus clavulanic acid, 2 micrograms/ml) confirmed susceptibility (MIC less than or equal to 64 micrograms/ml) of only 8 (38%) of 21 isolates. Time-kill studies of disk diffusion susceptible isolates indicated 2 log10 or greater killing of most isolates at 6 h in broth containing ticarcillin (64 micrograms/ml) combined with clavulanic acid (1, 2, 5, or 10 micrograms/ml). After 6 h, regrowth was common in all concentrations of clavulanic acid except 10 micrograms/ml. Regrowth populations were resistant to ticarcillin-clavulanate by MIC determination. Poor bactericidal activity of ticarcillin-clavulanate against ticarcillin-resistant P. aeruginosa was confirmed, as most isolates did not undergo 99.9% or greater killing at 24 h in all concentrations of clavulanic acid. Serotype O-11 was our most common serotype and was associated with disk diffusion "pseudosusceptibility." Concomitant disk diffusion testing of ticarcillin-clavulanate and ticarcillin is recommended for testing the susceptibility of P. aeruginosa to ticarcillin-clavulanate by disk diffusion. P. aeruginosa isolates resistant to ticarcillin should as a rule be considered also resistant to ticarcillin-clavulanate, despite apparent susceptibility by disk diffusion.     

Pharmacodynamic study of beta-lactams alone and in combination with beta-lactamase inhibitors against Pseudomonas aeruginosa possessing an inducible beta-lactamase

OBJECTIVES: The antimicrobial efficacies of beta-lactams alone and in combination with beta-lactamase inhibitors were investigated by applying a rabbit tissue cage model against a strain of Pseudomonas aeruginosa with an inducible AmpC (iAmpC) beta-lactamase. METHODS: Two sterilized golf Wiffle balls were surgically implanted in the rabbit dorsal cervical area. After 4 weeks, Wiffle balls had filled with tissue cage fluid (TCF), in which 2 mL of 10(6) cfu/mL of the test isolate were inoculated. To achieve the same T > MIC as in humans, 400 mg/kg of the beta-lactams alone and in combination was administered twice a day via subcutaneous injection. The dosing regimens were as follows: piperacillin alone, 4 g piperacillin/0.5 g tazobactam; ticarcillin alone, 3 g ticarcillin/0.1 g clavulanate; and 3 g ticarcillin/ 0.3 g clavulanate. RESULTS: The changes in bacterial counts (log cfu/mL) after the 3 day treatments were as follows: 1.03 +/- 0.97 (control), -1.31 +/- 0.61 (piperacillin), -2.81 +/- 0.53 (4 g piperacillin/0.5 g tazobactam), -1.61 +/- 0.68 (ticarcillin), -3.42 +/- 0.75 (3 g ticarcillin/0.1 g clavulanate) and -1.65 +/- 1.47 log cfu/mL (3 g ticarcillin/0.3 g clavulanate). AmpC induction by high-dose clavulanate was observed in rabbit TCF, and was confirmed by the in vitro induction study. CONCLUSIONS: The study indicated that tazobactam significantly enhanced the antibacterial activity of piperacillin against iAmpC P. aeruginosa; clavulanate had synergy with the antibacterial activity of ticarcillin at low concentration, but had no effect on ticarcillin at high concentration due to AmpC induction by clavulanate.     

Comparative activities of the beta-lactamase inhibitors YTR 830, clavulanate and sulbactam combined with extended-spectrum penicillins against ticarcillin-resistant Enterobacteriaceae and pseudomonads

The in-vitro synergistic activity of YTR 830, a new beta-lactamase inhibitor, combined with four extended-spectrum penicillins (ticarcillin, piperacillin, mezlocillin and apalcillin) against ticarcillin-resistant clinical isolates of Gram-negative enteric bacilli was compared with that of clavulanate and sulbactam. Synergy testing was performed with fixed concentrations of beta-lactamase inhibitors (8 mg/l) combined with doubling dilutions of beta-lactams in microdilution trays. Synergy was defined as a four-fold or greater decrease of beta-lactam MIC in the combination compared with the beta-lactam alone. For 79 ticarcillin-resistant Enterobacteriaceae, ticarcillin-YTR 830 and ticarcillin-clavulanate were synergistic against 90% of strains; for ticarcillin-sulbactam, 70% showed synergy. The synergistic activity of all three inhibitors was similar against strains resistant only to ticarcillin; for strains resistant to all four extended-spectrum penicillins, the activity of ticarcillin with YTR 830 and clavulanate was similar (synergy against 79% of strains) and superior to ticarcillin-sulbactam (synergy against 39% of strains). YTR 830 was more active than clavulanate against Serratia, Citrobacter, Proteus and Providencia spp. Piperacillin, mezlocillin and apalcillin susceptible strains, with MICs of 8-16 mg/l, showed synergy with inhibitors against 37-87% of strains. Amongst pseudomonads, no synergy was demonstrated against Pseudomonas aeruginosa; ticarcillin produced synergy with the inhibitors against Ps. maltophilia, while piperacillin-YTR 830 and apalcillin-YTR 830 were synergistic against Ps. cepacia. YTR 830 appears to have comparable in-vitro activity to that of clavulanate, and further development of this compound is warranted.     

In vitro synergistic activities of tobramycin and selected beta-lactams against 75 gram-negative clinical isolates.

The microdilution checkerboard technique was utilized to distinguish synergistic activity between tobramycin and four beta-lactams: piperacillin-tazobactam, ticarcillin-clavulanate, ceftazidime, and ceftriaxone. Beta-lactam-aminoglycoside combinations were tested against 75 clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumanii, Citrobacterfreundii, Serratia marcescens, and Enterobacter cloacae. Despite in vitro susceptibilities, all isolates demonstrated either synergism or indifference; no antagonism was observed. Against pathogenic gram-negative nosocomial isolates, a greater percentage of synergy was consistently observed with combination regimens containing tobramycin and piperacillin-tazobactam or ticarcillin-clavulanate than with the cephalosporin-containing regimens.     

Influence of beta-lactamase inhibitors on the potency of their companion drug with organisms possessing class I enzymes

The ability of beta-lactamase inhibitors to induce class I beta-lactamases in certain organisms in vitro suggests a potential for antagonism in vivo. Therefore, a study was designed to assess the ability of sulbactam and clavulanate to induce beta-lactamases in two strains each of Enterobacter cloacae, Citrobacter freundii, Serratia marcescens, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa both in vitro and in vivo. Induction in vitro was observed only with S. marcescens and P. aeruginosa and generally only when inhibitor concentrations greater than 2 micrograms/ml were examined. A mouse model of lethal infection, designed to detect in vivo antagonism arising from beta-lactamase induction, was used to determine what effect sulbactam and clavulanate would have on the 50% protective doses (PD50s) of cefoperazone and ticarcillin. Antagonism (a significant increase in the PD50) was observed in only 4 of 32 tests. Three of these involved antagonism of cefoperazone by clavulanate, and one involved antagonism of cefoperazone by sulbactam. In 6 of 32 tests, enhancement of efficacy (a significant decrease in PD50) was observed. In four of these, sulbactam enhanced cefoperazone; in one, sulbactam enhanced ticarcillin; and in one, clavulanate enhanced ticarcillin. Four of the six cases of enhancement occurred when the beta-lactamase inhibitor was given at the time of challenge. None of these positive or negative in vivo effects were predicted by in vitro tests. These data suggest that beta-lactamase inhibitors can influence the in vivo potency of their companion drug in both a beneficial and detrimental fashion against organisms with class I beta-lactamases and that these effects cannot be predicted from in vitro assays.     

Comparison of the bactericidal activities of piperacillin-tazobactam, ticarcillin-clavulanate, and ampicillin-sulbactam against clinical isolates of Bacteroides fragilis, Enterococcus faecalis, Escherichia coli, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Owing to the broad spectrum of activity afforded by beta-lactam-beta-lactamase inhibitor preparations, these agents are frequently selected as empiric therapy for the treatment of mixed infections such as intra-abdominal and diabetic foot infections, either alone or in combination with an aminoglycoside. Twelve healthy volunteers were enrolled in a randomized, open-label, four-way crossover trial comparing the bactericidal activities of piperacillin-tazobactam, ticarcillin-clavulanate, and ampicillin-sulbactam against microorganisms commonly isolated from mixed infections. Subjects received the following regimes: (i) 3.375 g of piperacillin-tazobactam intravenously (i.v.) every 6 h (q6h) (ii) 4.5 g of piperacillin-tazobactam i.v. q8h, (iii) 3.1 g of ticarcillin-clavulanate i.v. q6h, and (iv) 3.0 g of ampicillin-sulbactam i.v. q6h. Serum bactericidal titers were determined and used to calculate the duration of measurable bactericidal activity over the dosing interval of each of the regimens against two clinical isolates of Bacillus fragilis, Escherichia coli, Enterococcus faecalis, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The percentage of the dosing interval over which drug concentrations in serum remained above the MIC for each organism was determined and compared with the observed duration of bactericidal activity was noted (r = 0.78; P < 0.001). All of the regimens demonstrated good activity against B. fragilis and E. coli. Against E. faecalis and P. aeruginosa, however, all of the regimens provided bactericidal activity for less than 50% of the respective dosing intervals. These data suggest that use of shorter dosing intervals or continuous-infusion regimens should be considered in combination with an aminoglycoside to improve the bactericidal profiles of these agents for E. faecalis and P. aeruginosa.     

Activities and Time-Kill Studies of Selected Penicillins, β-Lactamase Inhibitor Combinations, and Glycopeptides against Enterococcus faecalis

The activities of piperacillin, piperacillin-tazobactam, ticarcillin, ticarcillin-clavulanate, ampicillin, ampicillin-sulbactam, vancomycin, and teicoplanin were tested against 212 Enterococcus faecalis strains (9 β-lactamase producers) by standard agar dilution MIC testing (10⁴ CFU/spot). The MICs at which 50 and 90% of the isolates were inhibited (MIC₅₀s and MIC₉₀s, respectively) were as follows (μg/ml): piperacillin, 4 and 8; piperacillin-tazobactam, 4 and 8; ticarcillin, 64 and 128; ticarcillin-clavulanate, 64 and 128; ampicillin, 2 and 2; ampicillin-sulbactam, 1 and 2; vancomycin, 1 and 4; and teicoplanin, 0.5 and 1. Agar dilution MIC testing of the nine β-lactamase-positive strains with an inoculum of 10⁶ CFU/spot revealed higher β-lactam MICs (piperacillin, 64 to >256 μg/ml; ticarcillin, 128 to >256 μg/ml; and ampicillin, 16 to 128 μg/ml); however, MICs with the addition of inhibitors were similar to those obtained with the lower inoculum. Time-kill studies of 15 strains showed that piperacillin-tazobactam was bactericidal (99.9% killing) for 14 strains after 24 h at four times the MIC, with 90% killing of all 15 strains at two times the MIC. After 12 and 6 h, 90% killing of 14 and 13 strains, respectively, was found at two times the MIC. Ampicillin gave 99.9% killing of 14 β-lactamase-negative strains after 24 h at eight times the MIC, with 90% killing of all 15 strains at two times the MIC. After 12 and 6 h, 90% killing of 14 and 13 strains, respectively, was found at two times the MIC. Killing by ticarcillin-clavulanate was slower than that observed for piperacillin-tazobactam, relative to the MIC. For the one β-lactamase-producing strain tested by time-kill analysis with a higher inoculum, addition of the three inhibitors (including sulbactam) to each of the β-lactams resulted in bactericidal activity at 24 h at two times the MIC. For an enzyme-negative strain, addition of inhibitors did not influence kinetics. Kinetics of vancomycin and teicoplanin were significantly slower than those of the β-lactams, with bactericidal activity against 6 strains after 24 h at eight times the MIC, with 90% killing of 12 and 14 strains, respectively, at four times the MIC. Slower-kill kinetics by both glycopeptides were observed at earlier periods.     

Inhibitory and bactericidal activity of selected beta-lactam agents alone and in combination with beta-lactamase inhibitors compared with that of cefoxitin and metronidazole against cefoxitin-susceptible and cefoxitin-resistant isolates of the Bacteroides fragilis group.

The inhibitory activity of five beta-lactam agents, alone and in combination with a beta-lactamase inhibitor, was compared with that of cefoxitin and metronidazole against 300 beta-lactamase producing Bacteroides fragilis group isolates. Each of the beta-lactamase inhibitors significantly potentiated the activity of the respective beta-lactam. In the presence of clavulanate, the MIC90 (minimum inhibitory concentration) values of amoxicillin and ticarcillin were reduced 64-fold and 32-fold, respectively. Similarly, sulbactam enhanced the activity of ampicillin and cefoperazone 16-fold and 8-fold, respectively, whereas tazobactam potentiated the activity of piperacillin 16-fold. Few strains were resistant to the beta-lactam-beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations and were comprised of strains of B. fragilis, B. thetaiotamicron, and B. distasonis. Of the strains, 7% were resistant to cefoxitin, and none to metronidazole. Using time-kill kinetic studies, the bactericidal activity of the various beta-lactam agents, with and without beta-lactamase inhibitors, was determined and compared with that of cefoxitin and metronidazole against cefoxitin-susceptible and cefoxitin-resistant isolates of the B. fragilis group. Overall, metronidazole was the most bactericidal agent with all isolates being killed with less than or equal to 4 micrograms/ml at 24 hr. Ampicillin-sulbactam was the next most bactericidal agent with all isolates being killed with less than or equal to 16/8 micrograms/ml of ampicillin-sulbactam at 24 hr. Amoxicillin-clavulanate and cefoperazone-sulbactam had bactericidal activity similar to that of ampicillin-sulbactam. Piperacillin-tazobactam and ticarcillin-clavulanate were bactericidal at higher concentrations with all isolates killed with 64 micrograms/ml of piperacillin and 128 micrograms/ml of ticarcillin combined with their respective beta-lactamase inhibitors. None of the beta-lactam agents alone was able to kill more than 19 of the 26 isolates. We conclude that beta-lactam agents combined with beta-lactamase inhibitors have both inhibitory and bactericidal activity against cefoxitin-resistant members of the B. fragilis group provided that the concentrations achieved for these combinations are at the upper limits for maximum recommended dosing. Although isolates of the B. fragilis group have been reported to produce unusual beta-lactamases that are refractory to beta-lactamase inhibitors, none of the cefoxitin-resistant isolates tested in this study were resistant to the beta-lactam-beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations.     

Serum and blister fluid pharmacokinetics and bactericidal activities of ampicillin-sulbactam, cefotetan, cefoxitin, ceftizoxime, and ticarcillin-clavulanate.

Ampicillin-sulbactam, ticarcillin-clavulanate, cefoxitin, cefotetan, and ceftizoxime are promoted for the treatment of mixed aerobic-anaerobic bacterial infections. Their activities have been compared in vitro but not in vivo. In order to assess the in vivo activities of these agents in serum and interstitial fluid, we administered single, intravenous doses of these antimicrobial agents to healthy subjects. Concentrations of the antimicrobial agents in serum and suction-induced blister fluid and bactericidal activity were measured by high-pressure liquid chromatography and the standard methodology of the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, respectively. The organisms used for bactericidal activity tests were one isolate each of Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Bacteroides fragilis. Pharmacokinetic parameters in serum and blister fluid were similar to those derived in other investigations. Of note were the high and prolonged concentrations of ticarcillin and cefotetan in blister fluid, despite high-level serum protein binding. The bactericidal activities in serum and blister fluid reflected the relative in vitro activities and kinetic dispositions of the various antimicrobial agents except for the bactericidal activity of cefotetan, which was substantially lower in blister fluid than serum, despite a blister fluid:serum area under the concentration-time curve ratio of 1.5. Similarly, the activity of ticarcillin-clavulanate in blister fluid was also substantially less than would have been predicted by the blister fluid:serum ratio of the area under the concentration-time curve of 1.1, possibly because of the low concentrations of clavulanate in blister fluid. The rankings of the in vivo bactericidal activities of the five drugs were as follows: for S. aureus, ampicillin-sulbactam > ticarcillin-clavulanate > ceftizoxime > cefoxitin > cefotetan; for K. pneumoniae, ceftizoxime > cefotetan > ampicillin-sulbactam = ticarcillin-clavulanate > cefoxitin; and for B.fragilis, ticarcillin-clavulanate > cefotetan > ceftizoxime > ampicillin-sulbactam = cefoxitin.     

Induction of chromosomal beta-lactamases by different concentrations of clavulanic acid in combination with ticarcillin

The effect of different concentrations of clavulanic acid (CA) in combination with ticarcillin on beta-lactamase production and ticarcillin MIC was studied in four clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Enterobacter cloacae, Serratia marcescens, Citrobacter freundii and indole positive Proteus strains. Ticarcillin alone showed a low inducing effect for all species tested, Ser. marcescens excepted. The increase in beta-lactamase activity after addition of CA (2-10 mg/l) was strain and species dependent. No synergy or antagonism was observed on the ticarcillin MIC for the micro-organisms producing only a chromosomally mediated beta-lactamase, though the susceptibility to ticarcillin strongly increased if the strains also produced a plasmid-mediated beta-lactamase. Addition of 50 or 100 mg/l CA resulted in all strains. C. freundii excepted, in a strong increase in beta-lactamase activity and in a strong synergistic effect on the ticarcillin MIC. However, these concentrations are unlikely to be achieved at clinical doses. Thus, irrespective of the inducing effect of ticarcillin and CA (2-10 mg/l) combinations, induction of the chromosomal beta-lactamase did not result in a decrease in ticarcillin susceptibility.     

Ex vivo pharmacodynamics of amoxicillin-clavulanate against beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli in a yucatan miniature pig model that mimics human pharmacokinetics

The objective of the present study was to investigate the potential bactericidal activity of amoxicillin-clavulanate against beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli strains and to elucidate the extent to which enzyme production affects the activity. Six adult Yucatan miniature pigs received a single intravenous dose of 1.1 g of amoxicillin-clavulanate as an intravenous infusion over 30 min. The pharmacokinetic parameters were determined for the serum samples and compared to the published data for humans (2.2-g intravenous dose). The parameters were comparable for the two species, and therefore, the miniature pig constitutes a good model for pharmacodynamic study of amoxicillin-clavulanate. Therefore, the model was used in an ex vivo pharmacodynamic study of amoxicillin-clavulanate against four strains of Escherichia coli producing beta-lactamases at different levels. The E. coli strains were cultured with serial dilutions (1:2 to 1:256) of the serum samples from the pharmacokinetic study, and the number of surviving bacteria was determined after 1, 3, and 6 h of exposure. Amoxicillin-clavulanate at concentrations less than the MIC and the minimal bactericidal concentration had marked bactericidal potency against the strain that produced low levels of penicillinase. For high-level or intermediate-level beta-lactamase-producing strains, the existence of a clavulanate concentration threshold of 1.5 to 2 micro g/ml, below which there was no bactericidal activity, was demonstrated. The index of surviving bacteria showed the existence of mixed concentration- and time-dependent actions of amoxicillin (in the presence of clavulanate) which varied as a function of the magnitude of beta-lactamase production by the test strains. This study shows the effectiveness of amoxicillin-clavulanate against low- and intermediate-level penicillinase-producing strains of E. coli. These findings are to be confirmed in a miniature pig experimental infection model.     

Susceptibilities of 200 penicillin-susceptible and -resistant pneumococci to piperacillin, piperacillin-tazobactam, ticarcillin, ticarcillin-clavulanate, ampicillin, ampicillin-sulbactam, ceftazidime, and ceftriaxone.

MICs of eight beta-lactams (piperacillin, piperacillin-tazobactam, ticarcillin, ticarcillin-clavulanate, ampicillin, ampicillin-sulbactam, ceftazidime, and ceftriaxone) were determined by agar dilution against 64 penicillin-susceptible, 70 intermediately penicillin-resistant, and 66 fully penicillin-resistant pneumococci. The MICs of piperacillin with and without tazobactam for 90% of the susceptible, intermediately resistant, and resistant strains tested (MIC90s) were < or = 0.064, 2.0, and 4.0 micrograms/ml, respectively. By comparison, those of ampicillin with and without sulbactam were 0.125, 2.0, and 4.0 micrograms/ml and those of ceftriaxone were < or = 0.064, 1.0, and 2.0 micrograms/ml, respectively. Strains were less susceptible to ticarcillin with and without clavulanate (MIC90s, 2.0, 64.0, and 128.0 micrograms/ml) and ceftazidime (MIC90s, 1.0, 8.0, and 32.0 micrograms/ml).     

Comparative Study of Anti-Pseudomonas Activity of Azlocillin, Mezlocillin, and Ticarcillin

The anti-pseudomonas activities of azlocillin and mezlocillin were compared with that of ticarcillin. We measured the minimal inhibitory and minimal bactericidal concentrations of the three drugs against 20 different strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and found significantly lower values for azlocillin than for the other two drugs. We then infused 5 g of each drug into 10 volunteers on three consecutive days and determined the serum levels of the three antibiotics at 1-h intervals from 1 to 6 h after injection. The levels of azlocillin were significantly higher than those of mezlocillin and ticarcillin (at 1 h: 236.55 mug/ml +/- 12.9 for azlocillin, 192.45 mug/ml +/- 28.8 for mezlocillin, and 131.5 mug/ml +/- 10.9 for ticarcillin). The inhibitory and bactericidal activities of the sera obtained 1 and 6 h after the injection against the same 20 strains of P. aeruginosa demonstrated a significantly greater anti-pseudomonas activity of azlocillin when compared with mezlocillin and ticarcillin; mezlocillin and ticarcillin had approximately the same activity. The mean values for bactericidal activity against the strains tested were 1/32 for azlocillin, 1/8 for mezlocillin, and 1/8 for ticarcillin. Azlocillin thus appears to be a promising anti-pseudomonas drug and should be tested in clinical trials.     

Ex vivo pharmacodynamic study of piperacillin alone and in combination with tazobactam, compared with ticarcillin plus clavulanic acid.

Ten volunteers received piperacillin (4 g), piperacillin (4 g) plus tazobactam (0.5 g) (Tazocin), and ticarcillin (3 g) plus clavulanic acid (0.2 g) (Timentin) intravenously over 30 min in a cross-over blinded scheme. Blood samples were obtained 0.5 and 3 h after the end of infusion to measure by (high-pressure liquid chromatography) the concentration and bactericidal titers against 70 gram-negative bacilli. Serum time-kill curves were done against 35 strains to measure killing rates and area under the time-kill curve. Using the measure of serum bactericidal activity, ticarcillin-clavulanic acid and piperacillin-tazobactam were equally effective against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli, Enterobacter cloacae, Serratia marcescens, and Bacteroides fragilis. Piperacillin-tazobactam was superior to ticarcillin-clavulanic acid against piperacillin-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (4 to 16 times) and S. marcescens (2 to 4 times). By using the area under the time-kill curve, piperacillin-tazobactam was equivalent to ticarcillin-clavulanic acid against piperacillin-susceptible strains; piperacillin-tazobactam was significantly more active than piperacillin against piperacillin-resistant strains and was more active than ticarcillin-clavulanic acid when the sample obtained 3 h after the end of infusion to volunteers was considered. Serum piperacillin concentrations (mean +/- standard error of the mean; in mg/liter) were 115 +/- 13 at 0.5 h and 7.4 +/- 1.4 at 3 h after the administration of piperacillin alone and 105.5 +/- 12.6 (0.5 h) and 7.7 +/- 1.6 after the administration of piperacillin-tazobactam. Serum tazobactam concentrations (in milligram per liter) were 13.1 +/- 1.4 at 0.5 h and 1.2 +/- 0.2 at 3 h. The piperacillin-tazobactam ratio was 8 +/- 0.3 at 0.5 h and 6.2 +/- 0.5 at 3 h. Piperacillin-tazobactam appears promising against beta-lactamase-producing gram-negative bacilli.     

AmpG inactivation restores susceptibility of pan-beta-lactam-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical strains

Constitutive AmpC hyperproduction is the most frequent mechanism of resistance to the weak AmpC inducers antipseudomonal penicillins and cephalosporins. Previously, we demonstrated that inhibition of the β-N-acetylglucosaminidase NagZ prevents and reverts this mechanism of resistance, which is caused by ampD and/or dacB (PBP4) mutations in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. In this work, we compared NagZ with a second candidate target, the AmpG permease for GlcNAc-1,6-anhydromuropeptides, for their ability to block AmpC expression pathways. Inactivation of nagZ or ampG fully restored the susceptibility and basal ampC expression of ampD or dacB laboratory mutants and impaired the emergence of one-step ceftazidime-resistant mutants in population analysis experiments. Nevertheless, only ampG inactivation fully blocked ampC induction, reducing the MICs of the potent AmpC inducer imipenem from 2 to 0.38 μg/ml. Moreover, through population analysis and characterization of laboratory mutants, we showed that ampG inactivation minimized the impact on resistance of the carbapenem porin OprD, reducing the MIC of imipenem for a PAO1 OprD mutant from >32 to 0.5 μg/ml. AmpG and NagZ targets were additionally evaluated in three clinical isolates that are pan-β-lactam resistant due to AmpC hyperproduction, OprD inactivation, and overexpression of several efflux pumps. A marked increase in susceptibility to ceftazidime and piperacillin-tazobactam was observed in both cases, while only ampG inactivation fully restored wild-type imipenem susceptibility. Susceptibility to meropenem, cefepime, and aztreonam was also enhanced, although to a lower extent due to the high impact of efflux pumps on the activity of these antibiotics. Thus, our results suggest that development of small-molecule inhibitors of AmpG could provide an excellent strategy to overcome the relevant mechanisms of resistance (OprD inactivation plus AmpC induction) to imipenem, the only currently available β-lactam not significantly affected by P. aeruginosa major efflux pumps.     

Susceptibilities of 123 strains of Xanthomonas maltophilia to eight beta-lactams (including beta-lactam-beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations) and ciprofloxacin tested by five methods.

This study evaluated the susceptibility of 123 Xanthomonas maltophilia strains to ticarcillin, ticarcillin-clavulanate, ampicillin, amoxicillin-clavulanate, ampicillin-sulbactam, piperacillin, piperacillin-tazobactam, imipenem, and ciprofloxacin by Kirby-Bauer disk, E test, and Sensititre dehydrated microdilution MIC and conventional agar dilution MIC methodology. Intermediate susceptibility breakpoints for members of the family Enterobacteriaceae were used. When results were analyzed as MICs for 50 and 90% of the strains tested and percentages of strains susceptible at the breakpoint, good correlation between the methods was observed, with ticarcillin-clavulanate clearly the most active beta-lactam by all four methods. However, when the various methods were compared with the agar dilution methodology by regression analysis, poor r2 values (0.3 to 0.7) were obtained for compounds with sufficient on-scale values to permit analysis. When the number of strains with log2 ratios of reference agar dilution MICs to test MICs of +3 to -3 were analyzed, correlation was also poor, with many major and very major discrepancies for all methods tested. Results obtained with time-kill studies of nine strains with discrepant ticarcillin-clavulanate MICs appeared to correlate best when compared at 24 h with agar dilution MICs. The concentration of ticarcillin-clavulanate required to reduce the colony count by > or = 2 log10 reduction values for eight of nine strains compared with that for growth controls was < or = 16.0/2.0 micrograms/ml at 6 h and ranged from 16.0/2.0 micrograms/ml to 128.0/2.0 micrograms/ml at 24 h. The susceptibility method of choice for X. maltophilia has not yet been standardized, but time-kill studies correlated best with agar dilution MICs.     

Effect of Two Cancer Chemotherapeutic Agents on the Antibacterial Activity of Three Antimicrobial Agents

Cancer chemotherapeutic agents and antibacterial antibiotics are often given concomitantly. Daunorubicin, cytosine arabinoside, and three antibiotics (gentamicin, amikacin, and ticarcillin) were tested individually and in combinations to determine their antimicrobial activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Escherichia coli. These cytotoxic agents are commonly employed in the therapy of acute nonlymphocytic leukemia for remission induction therapy, and these antimicrobial agents are used in infection therapy. The maximum concentrations of the two cytotoxic drugs were chosen to be twice the known peak plasma levels of commonly employed dosage schedules. Neither of the cancer chemotherapeutic agents, alone or in combination, demonstrated bactericidal activity at the levels tested. However, in the presence of these agents, the antimicrobial activity of gentamicin and amikacin, although not that of ticarcillin, was depressed for 11 of 15 K. pneumoniae strains and 8 of 15 P. aeruginosa strains, but for none of the strains of E. coli. This level of decreased activity occasionally resulted in a minimal inhibitory concentration of the tested aminoglycoside well above the standard serum levels. Daunorubicin was more likely to antagonize gentamicin than was cytosine arabinoside.     

Beta-lactamase production and susceptibilities to amoxicillin, amoxicillin-clavulanate, ticarcillin, ticarcillin-clavulanate, cefoxitin, imipenem, and metronidazole of 320 non-Bacteroides fragilis Bacteroides isolates and 129 fusobacteria from 28 U.S. centers.

beta-Lactamase production (nitrocefin disk method) and agar dilution susceptibility of amoxicillin, amoxicillin-clavulanate, ticarcillin, ticarcillin-clavulanate, cefoxitin, imipenem, and metronidazole were determined for 320 Bacteroides species (not Bacteroides fragilis group) and 129 fusobacteria from 28 U.S. centers. Overall, 64.7% of Bacteroides species and 41.1% of fusobacteria were beta-lactamase positive. Among the Bacteroides species, positivity rates were highest for B. bivius (85.0%), followed by B. splanchnicus (83.3%), B. eggerthii (77.8%), and B. oralis (77.1%); 54.5% of black-pigmented Bacteroides species were beta-lactamase positive. Among the fusobacteria, Fusobacterium mortiferum showed the highest rate of beta-lactamase positivity (76.9%). MICs of amoxicillin (128 micrograms/ml) and ticarcillin (64 micrograms/ml) for 90% of all beta-lactamase-positive strains were reduced to 4 and 2 micrograms/ml, respectively, with the addition of clavulanate. MICs of amoxicillin and ticarcillin for 90% of all beta-lactamase-negative strains were 1 and 4 micrograms/ml, respectively, and greater than or equal to 98.4% of the strains were susceptible to the beta-lactams tested. Of the beta-lactamase-producing strains, 45.9% were susceptible to amoxicillin at less than or equal to 4 micrograms/ml and 93.4% were susceptible to ticarcillin at less than or equal to 64 micrograms/ml; the addition of clavulanate raised the rates to 90.4 and 100%, respectively. All strains were susceptible to cefoxitin, imipenem, and metronidazole. The activity of amoxicillin against 29 beta-lactamase-producing strains (10 Bacteroides species and 19 fusobacteria) was not enhanced by the addition of clavulanate; however, 82.7% of these strains were susceptible to amoxicillin, and all were susceptible to ticarcillin. Although beta-lactamase positivity is on the increase in non-B. fragilis group Bacteroides species and fusobacteria, amoxicillin-clavulanate, ticarcillin, cefoxitin, imipenem, and metronidazole should be suitable for the treatment of infections with these strains. The addition of clavulanate does not appreciably improve the efficacy of ticarcillin against these organisms.