改良Sublay-Keyhole技术原位修补造口旁疝

目的探讨改良Sublay-Keyhole技术原位修补造口旁疝的方法及疗效。方法 2007年10月-2010年3月,采用改良Sublay-Keyhole技术原位修补造口旁疝11例。男5例,女6例;年龄55～72岁,平均63岁。体重指数为23.5～32.5,平均28.2。患者均为永久性造瘘,其中6例为低位直肠癌行Miles术式后的乙状结肠末端造瘘,2例为溃疡性结肠炎行全结肠切除术后的回肠末端造瘘,3例为膀胱癌行回肠代膀胱术后的回肠末端造瘘。1例患者既往曾行聚丙烯补片修补后复发。末次手术至该次入院时间为1～4.5年,平均2.5年。根据George Eliot医院分类标准:2b级3例,3a级2例,3b级5例,4级1例。疝环最长径为6～12cm,平均9.5cm。结果 11例均以改良Sublay-Keyhole技术成功完成腹壁重建手术。术中测量疝环面积为30～112cm2,平均75.5cm2;应用聚丙烯补片面积为175～360cm2,平均280.5cm2。手术时间120～195min,平均165min;术后住院时间9～14d,平均11d。术后患者切口均Ⅰ期愈合,无腹壁感染发生。2例(18.2%)发生血清肿,1例(9.1%)发生腹壁血肿,对症处理后愈合。11例均获随访,随访时间10～39个月,平均26.3个月。1例(9.1%)于术后11个月造口旁疝复发,再次修补手术时发现疝环关闭处缝线松脱同时补片孔洞过于宽大,予以缝合缩窄后随访15个月无复发;其余10例患者术后未见造口旁疝复发或发生其他切口疝。结论改良Sublay-Keyhole技术是造口旁疝患者腹壁重建的有效方法,具有复发率低、并发症少等优点,但远期疗效需进一步观察随访。     

腹腔镜造口旁疝修补术13例报告

目的探讨采用腹腔镜钥匙孔手术行造口旁疝修补术的可行性。方法回顾性分析2007年11月～2011年10月采用钥匙孔技术及Proceed补片完成的13例腹腔镜造口旁疝修补术的临床资料。2例回肠代膀胱造瘘,11例左下腹永久性乙状结肠造瘘,其中1例为造口旁疝修补术后复发。术中游离疝周粘连后,将补片适当修剪,中间留圆孔,置于疝囊下方,用5mm螺旋钉枪固定于腹壁。结果所有患者均顺利完成手术。术中并发症2例：横结肠系膜血管损伤1例,造瘘肠管损伤1例;术后并发症3例：切口感染1例,血清肿2例。术后随访5-52个月,平均26个月,1例复发,1例死于肺部感染。结论采用腹腔镜钥匙孔手术及Proceed补片行腹腔镜造口旁疝修补术是安全可行的,临床疗效较为满意,在降低造口旁疝修补术后补片相关并发症发生率和复发率方面具有一定的意义。     

腹腔镜下造瘘口旁疝修补的临床应用

目的探讨腹腔镜下造瘘口旁疝修补的临床价值。方法我院2011年5月~2016年3月对12例造瘘口旁疝行腹腔镜下造瘘口旁疝修补,腹腔镜下松解和游离肠管周围粘连,松解疝囊及造瘘肠管周围粘连,并将疝内容物回纳至腹腔,腹腔内置入带有刻度的硬膜外麻醉导管,测量疝环的大小和造瘘肠管的粗细。根据测量结果将疝补片裁剪后送入腹腔,环绕造口肠管,覆盖缺损区域腹壁,固定补片。结果 12例手术均取得成功,术中发现疝环直径3.5~8.5 cm,平均5.7 cm。手术时间55~100 min,平均70 min。住院时间3~9 d,平均5.2 d。12例随访3个月~4年,中位随访时间3年2个月,无死亡、复发。结论腹腔镜下造瘘口旁疝修补术安全、可行,临床效果满意。     

腹腔镜下CK Parastomal补片修补造口旁疝疗效分析

目的总结腹腔镜下应用CK Parastomal补片修补造口旁疝的手术方法及临床疗效。方法回顾分析2006年6月-2010年3月24例于腹腔镜下应用CK Parastomal补片修补造口旁疝患者的临床资料。男15例,女9例;年龄47～80岁,中位年龄55岁。左下腹结肠造口旁疝19例,右下腹回肠造口旁疝5例。发生造口旁疝时间1～4年,平均2.4年。疝环最大径3～7 cm,平均5.2 cm。均无疝修补史。结果 18例成功完成腹腔镜下修补,6例因腹腔内广泛致密粘连转为开放手术。手术时间78～178 min,平均121 min。术后切口均Ⅰ期愈合。术后3～7 d 8例发生浆液肿,均经穿刺抽吸后消失。术后1个月内11例出现修补区域腹壁疼痛,均自行消失。24例患者术后均获随访,随访时间6～39个月,平均27个月。术后3个月1例复发,其余患者随访期间均无复发。结论 腹腔镜下应用CK Parastomal补片修补造口旁疝是一种安全、可行的方法,可获得较好的近期疗效,但远期效果尚需进一步观察。     

DynaMesh-IPST补片在造口旁疝杂交修补中的应用

目的探讨采用Dyna Mesh-IPST补片行造口旁疝杂交修补术的近期疗效。方法 2013年10月-2016年6月,采用Dyna Mesh-IPST补片行造口旁疝杂交修补术治疗28例直肠癌腹会阴联合根治术后乙状结肠造口旁疝患者。男18例,女10例;年龄49~84岁,平均71岁。造口旁疝形成时间6~60个月,平均27.6个月。身体质量指数(body mass index,BMI)为17~35,平均25.6;其中15例达肥胖(BMI26)。结果患者均顺利完成手术。术中见疝环直径4~9 cm,平均6 cm。手术时间110~190 min,平均142 min;住院时间7~12 d,平均9 d。术后2例发生浆液肿,经穿刺抽液及加压包扎治愈。患者均获随访,随访时间1~33个月,平均19个月。随访期间无1例复发、无感染、肠瘘等其他造口相关并发症发生,腹壁外观对称。结论采用Dyna Mesh-IPST补片行造口旁疝杂交修补术安全可行,近期疗效满意。     

经同侧腹直肌易位造口腹腔镜造口旁疝修补术17例疗效分析

目的评价应用经同侧腹直肌易位造口的腹腔镜造口旁疝修补术疗效。方法回顾性分析2015年1月至2016年12月期间在哈尔滨医科大学附属第四医院行腹腔镜下修补并经腹直肌易位造口治疗的17例造口旁疝病人的临床资料。结果 17例病人均顺利完成经同侧腹直肌易位造口,在腹腔镜下放置补片加强造口周围腹壁及修补原部位腹壁缺损,其中应用Keyhole修补法6例,Sugarbaker法11例。手术时间为139.1(90~200)min,术后住院时间为13.9(10~18)d。术后发生切口感染2例,疼痛3例(4~5周后缓解)。术后随访10.5(4~19)个月,所有病人均恢复腹壁形态及功能和造口功能,新造口未发生造口相关并发症。结论经同侧腹直肌易位造口腹腔镜造口旁疝修补术治疗造口不满意的造口旁疝治疗效果明显,并发症发生率及复发率低,安全可行。     

腹腔镜下回肠袋膀胱造口旁疝补片修补术初步体会

目的 探讨腹腔镜下回肠袋膀胱造口旁疝补片修补术的有效性和安全性.方法 2004年9月至2006年12月,共对18例造口旁疝进行腹腔镜补片修补术,其中回肠袋膀胱造口旁疝3例.结果 3例均修补成功.手术时间45～90 min,平均63.3 min.疝环直径4～5 cm,平均4.5 cm.术后暂时性腹胀1例;1例修补区域腹壁明显疼痛,2周内缓解;1例血清肿,经2次穿刺抽液并加压包扎后治愈,无血肿发生,未发生与手术相关的感染.术后住院时间3～5 d,平均4 d;术后随访17～25个月,平均21.3月,未见复发.结论 腹腔镜下回肠袋膀胱的造口旁疝补片修补术从技术上讲是安全、可行的,早期的临床结果较理想.     

预防性回肠造口在腹腔镜超低位直肠癌保肛术中的应用

为评价预防性回肠造口在腹腔镜超低位直肠癌保肛术中应用的安全性和有效性,回顾性分析113例腹腔镜超低位直肠癌保肛并行预防性回肠造口患者的临床资料。结果显示,113例患者均行根治性手术,并预防性末段回肠双腔造口,术后3月造瘘口还纳。术后并发症:吻合口漏4例,肠梗阻9例,造瘘口旁疝1例,切口感染3例。随访3~24月,吻合口处肿瘤复发1例。结果表明,预防性回肠造口在腹腔镜超低位直肠癌保肛术中的应用安全、有效,显著降低术后吻合口瘘发生率。     

新型Dual Lap修补手术治疗成人复杂造口旁疝的临床研究

目的 探讨新型腹腔镜联合开腹杂交手术修补方法(Dual Lap)治疗成人复杂造口旁疝的可行性和临床疗效。方法 回顾性分析2015年1月至2021年1月期间，采用开腹经腹壁修补和腹腔镜修补相结合的杂交手术修补方式(即Dual Lap术式)治疗的21例成人复杂造口旁疝临床资料。其中男性16例，女性5例；年龄(63.6±5.2)岁(51～78岁);其中膀胱癌术后回肠代膀胱造口病人3例，结直肠癌术后结肠造口病人15例，溃疡性结肠炎全结肠切除术后永久性回肠造口病人2例，家族性结肠息肉病全结肠切除术后永久性回肠造口病人1例；嵌顿性造口旁疝6例，复发造口旁疝4例，合并腹壁切口疝11例。结果 21例病人Dual Lap杂交修补手术均顺利完成，术中探查造口旁疝疝环直径为(6.8±1.7) cm(3～15 cm),切口疝疝环直径为(4.8±1.3) cm(3～7 cm),手术修补时间为(100.7±21.5) min(90～140 min);术中无肾脏、输尿管及肠管损伤；术后72 h内疼痛需使用镇痛剂辅助治疗的病人8例，使用时间3 d;术后住院时间为(8.1±2.7) d(7～13 d);术后7 d时所有...     

腹腔镜修补造口旁疝术式选择和技术要点

全腹腔镜造口旁疝修补术治疗结肠造口旁疝术后复发率高;腹腔镜Sugarbaker修补术治疗回肠造口旁疝效果较好;腹腔镜Lap-re-Do修补术较全腹腔镜造口旁疝修补术修补效果更好。对于疝囊较小、较早期的结肠造口旁疝、回肠造口旁疝及回肠代膀胱的造口旁疝,全腹腔镜造口旁疝Sugarbaker法修补术可作为选择术式之一;而对于更多的结肠造口旁疝,腹腔镜Lap-re-Do修补术可能是更好的选择。     

Laparoscopic repair of incisional and parastomal hernias after major genitourinary or abdominal surgery

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Abdominal wall or parastomal hernias following major genitourinary or abdominal surgery are a significant surgical problem. Open surgical repair is difficult because of adhesion formation and poor definition of the hernia fascial edges. Laparoscopic intervention has allowed effective correction of these abdominal wall hernias. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From November 1997 to June 2000, 14 male and 3 female patients underwent laparoscopic abdominal wall herniorrhaphy at our institution. Of these, 13 patients received incisional and 4 parastomal hernia repair. All hernia defects were repaired using a measured piece of Gore-Tex DualMesh. A retrospective review of each patient's history and operative characteristics was undertaken. RESULTS: All repairs were successful. No patient required conversion to an open procedure, and there were no intraoperative complications. The average operative time was 4 (range 2.5-6.5) and 4.3 (range 3.75-5.5) hours in the incisional and parastomal group, respectively. The average hospital stay was 4.9 days (range 2-12) for the incisional group and 3.8 (range 3-4) days for the parastomal group. To date, two patients experienced a recurrence of incisional hernias, at 5 and 8 months postoperatively. No recurrences have developed in the parastomal hernia repairs at 2 to 33 months. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic repair of abdominal wall incisional or parastomal hernias provides an excellent anatomic correction of such defects. Adhesions are lysed under magnified laparoscopic vision, and the true limits of the fascial defects are clearly identified. The DualMesh is easy to work with and has yielded excellent results. A comparison with open repair with respect to perioperative factors and long-term success is currently under way.     

补片修补造口旁疝38例疗效

目的总结造口旁疝应用Keyhole补片及超普平片进行疝修补术的疗效。 方法回顾性分析2005年1月至2018年4月,上海交通大学附属第六人民医院采用Keyhole补片及超普平片对38例造口旁疝患者行疝修补术治疗的临床资料。 结果38例造口旁疝患者均采用置入补片的疝修补术实施修补。其中15例行开放手术,6例行纯腔镜下腹膜内补片植入手术,5例行开放结合腔镜的杂交手术,12例行Lap-re-Do手术。手术时间40～300 min,平均（150±72）min。全部随访时间2～46个月,其中造口旁疝复发2例（缝合疝环、补片加固）,浆液肿4例,切口感染3例,造口肠管血运轻度障碍1例,均处理痊愈。 结论造口旁疝应积极应用补片行疝修补手术,疗效可靠。术式需根据术前仔细评估和术中情况做相应选择。     

Parastomal Hernia Repair: a Single Center Experience

Background/Objectives:

Despite multiple options for operative repair of parastomal hernia, results are frequently disappointing. We review our experience with parastomal hernia repair.

Methods:

A retrospective chart review was performed on all patients with parastomal hernia who underwent LAP or open repair at our institution between 1999 and 2006. Information collected included demographics, indication for stoma creation, operative time, length of stay, postoperative complications, and recurrence.

Results:

Twenty-five patients who underwent laparoscopic or open parastomal hernia repair were identified. Laparoscopic repair was attempted on 12 patients and successfully completed on 11. Thirteen patients underwent open repair. Operative time was 172±10.0 minutes for laparoscopic and 137±19.1 minutes for open cases (P=0.14). Lengths of stay were 3.1±0.4 days (laparoscopic) and 5.1±0.8 days (open), P=0.05. Immediate postoperative complications occurred in 4 laparoscopic patients (33.3%) and 2 open patients (15.4%), P=0.38. Parastomal hernia recurred in 4 laparoscopic patients (33.3%) and 7 open patients (53.8%) after 13.9±4.5 months and 21.4±4.3 months, respectively, P=0.43.

Conclusion:

Laparoscopic modified Sugarbaker technique in the repair of parastomal hernia affords an alternative to open repair for treating parastomal hernia.     

机器人与腹腔镜手术治疗造口旁疝18例临床分析

目的探讨达芬奇机器人和腹腔镜微创手术在造口旁疝治疗中的应用。 方法回顾性分析2018年4月至2022年4月在福建医科大学附属协和医院使用达芬奇机器人系统和腹腔镜行微创造口旁疝无张力修补术的18例患者资料。记录并比较两组手术时间、术中出血量、恢复进食时间、术后切口感染、麻痹性肠梗阻、引流管拔除时间、住院天数等,远期随访指标包括复发、补片感染、慢性疼痛。 结果18例均顺利完成造口旁疝无张力修补术,合并行造口重建术4例（22.2%）。Sugarbaker法修补13例（72.2%）,其中使用达芬奇机器人系统2例,使用腹腔镜11例;Keyhole法修补5例（27.7%）,其中使用达芬奇机器人系统1例,使用腹腔镜4例。手术时间191~406 min,平均（276.8±71.3）min。术中出血量20~100 ml,平均（29.3±22.2）ml。术后第2天恢复流质饮食,第3天进食半流质;放置引流管病例,术后5~7 d拔除引流管;常规腹带束缚3~6个月。术后住院时间3~19 d,平均（8.2±4.7）d。术后复发1例（5.6%）,切口感染1例（5.6%）,麻痹性肠梗阻3例（16.7%）,肺部感染6例（33.3%）,切口感染及麻痹性肠梗阻病例均经过非手术治疗后痊愈出院。随访期间均未出现复发、补片感染、慢性疼痛。 结论使用达芬奇机器人系统和腹腔镜进行微创造口旁疝无张力修补术均安全可行,围手术期并发症少,术后恢复快,疗效确切。     

��ͬ�ֱู����λ��ڸ�ǻ����������޲���17����Ч����

??Curative effect of laparoscopic parastomal hernia repair with stoma relocation trans ispilateral rectus abdominis: An analysis of 17 cases LI Wei-dong, WANG Dong, JI Yan-chao, et al. Department of General Surgery, the Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150001, China
Corresponding author: LIU Chang, E-mail:liuc72@hotmail.com
Abstract Objective To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of laparoscopic parastomal hernia repair with stoma relocation trans ipsilateral rectus abdominis. Methods The clinical data of 17 cases of parastomal hernia performed laparoscopic parsatomal hernia repair and stoma relocation trans ispilateral rectus abdominis from January 2015 to December 2016 in the Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University were analyzed retrospectively. Results All the 17 cases were treated successfully by stoma relocation trans ispilateral rectus abdominis and mesh were placed to strengthen the both new stoma area and original part of the abdominal wall defects. Six cases were performed by Keyhole procedure and 11 by Sugarbaker procedure. Mean operation time was 139.1 ( 90-200) min and postoperative hospital stay was 13.9 (10-18) day. Two cases had incisional infection and 3 cases had abdominal pain that could be alleviated in 4 to 5 weeks. All the cases were followed up for 10.5??4 to 19??months. All the cases were restored not only abdominal wall morphology and function, but also stoma function. There were no stoma related complication in the new stoma. Conclusion It is effective, safe and feasible to repair parastomal hernia with unsatisfied stoma and complex hernia by laparoscopic parsatomal hernia repair and stoma relocation trans ispilateral rectus abdominis,with lower complications and the recurrence rate.     

腹腔镜下造口旁疝补片修补术应用体会

目的探讨腹腔镜下造口旁疝修补术的临床效果。方法回顾性分析2007年9月至2010年4月期间8例行腹腔镜下造瘘口旁疝补片修补术患者的临床资料,分析手术情况、术后并发症及复发情况。结果 8例造口旁疝患者均在腹腔镜下修补成功。手术时间50～180min,平均135min。疝环大小4.5～6.5cm,平均5.0cm。术后1例出现肠梗阻及复发,后行腹腔镜探查及再次修补术。2例术后早期出现腹胀,1周后腹胀缓解。1例术后出现术区疼痛不适,对症治疗后缓解。本组未发生术区感染。住院时间5～14d,平均7.6d。术后随访1年,除1例复发后行再次手术外,均未见复发。结论腹腔镜下造口旁疝修补术如果注意操作要点,可以替代传统修补术。     

Simplified laparoscopic parastomal hernia repair: the scroll technique

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic parastomal hernia repair can be technically challenging. We herein present a simplified technique of laparoscopic parastomal hernia repair. METHODS: This technique entails fixation of the rolled mesh to the anterior abdominal wall before unfolding it, each side of the mesh is unfolded and fixed individually using transfascial sutures and tacks. RESULTS: This technique was used in 3 patients; The average time for mesh placement was about 30 minutes. The mean length of stay was 2 days. Apart from 1 patient who developed a transient postoperative seroma, there were no intraoperative or postoperative complications. CONCLUSIONS: This technique of mesh placement minimizes intracorporeal mesh manipulation, facilitates fixation of the mesh to the anterior abdominal wall, and provides adequate coverage to the hernia defect while hosting the colostomy without restriction.     

腔镜修复术治疗结肠造口旁疝

目的总结腔镜下补片修补造口旁疝的手术技术要点。方法回顾性分析2004年9月至2006年11月复旦大学附属华山医院外科收治的16例行腔镜修补术治疗结肠造口旁疝病人的临床资料。结果16例造口旁疝病人中,14例修补成功,2例中转为开放缝合修补（1例因腹腔内广泛致密粘连,1例因小肠损伤）。手术时间平均116min（45～180min）。疝环直径平均5.4cm（4～6cm）。术后出现暂时性腹胀4例,修补区域腹壁疼痛12例（最长持续3周后明显缓解）,1例出现呼吸功能减退（经使用无创呼吸机辅助治疗后缓解）,7例出现浆液肿（经2～4次穿刺抽液并加压包扎后治愈,无血肿发生,未发生与手术相关的感染）。术后住院时间平均5.4d（3～8d）。术后随访平均7个月（1～17个月）,未见早期复发,疝囊较小和发病初期就行修补术者外观优于疝囊较大和发病时间较长者。结论腹腔镜造口旁疝补片修补术从技术上讲是安全、可行的,从早期的临床结果来看,效果亦较理想。     

A modified sublay–keyhole technique for in situ parastomal hernia repair

Objective

The surgical treatment of a parastomal hernia is always challenging due to the high incidence of recurrence following primary repair, or stoma relocation and severe morbidities in prosthetic repair with polypropylene materials. We therefore developed a modified sublay–keyhole technique employing a polypropylene material to minimize the associated high risk of the procedure. We herein describe our initial clinical experience with this modified procedure.

Methods

A retrospective review was performed to obtain the clinical data for 11 patients with parastomal hernias who underwent the modified in situ Sublay–keyhole repair from November 2008 to August 2010.

Results

The mean hernia size was 58.7?cm² (range 30–96?cm²), with an average polypropylene mesh size of 376.3?cm² (range 270–464?cm²). The mean length of the operation was 147.9?min (range 120–195.0?min), and the mean postoperative hospital stay was 11?days (range 9–14?days). All patients had an uneventful incisional recovery, with no infections. Two seromas and one hematoma were found and treated with conservative management, such as with aspiration, physical therapy and compression. All patients had been followed up, with a mean length of follow-up of 23.5?months (range 11–39?months). One parastomal hernia recurrence was seen 11?months postoperatively. Breakdown of the sutures and an over-sized aperture cut in the mesh were detected as the causes of the recurrence during the secondary repair procedure. Only re-sutures in both the mesh aperture and myofascial dehiscence were executed for this patient, and no re-recurrence was observed during an additional follow-up of 15?months. No recurrence of the parastomal hernia or presentation of an incisional hernia was detected during the follow-up.

Conclusions

The modified Sublay–keyhole repair appears to be an effective procedure for parastomal hernias, with a low incidence of recurrence and risk of morbidities. Collection of more cases and further follow-up examinations will be needed to confirm our findings.