Evaluation of patient nasal saline irrigation practices following endoscopic sinus surgery

Background

Functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) is an effective treatment for chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). Postoperative management strategies after FESS often vary from surgeon to surgeon. Recent data suggests that nasal saline irrigation following FESS is almost universally recommended; however, patient adherence has not been formally evaluated. The purpose of this study is to evaluate postoperative nasal irrigation practices and its effects on short‐term outcomes in post‐FESS patients.

Methods

Eighty‐two patients were followed prospectively following FESS at a tertiary‐academic medical institution for 3 postoperative visits. Patients were surveyed on their irrigation practices (start date, frequency, and volume per irrigation per side), and adherence to prescribed antibiotic and steroid regimens. At each visit, 22‐item Sino‐Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT‐22) questionnaires and endoscopic examinations were evaluated by the Lund‐Kennedy Endoscopy Score (LKES). Factors evaluated include: patient demographics (age, sex, ethnicity), preoperative Lund‐Mackay and SNOT‐22 scores, comorbidities, extent of procedure, and use of nasal packing and/or spacers.

Results

Adherence to irrigation instructions was 82.9%. Factors significantly associated with compliance with irrigation instructions included younger age (p = 0.0022), prior irrigation (p < 0.0001), revision surgery (p = 0.0014), and non‐native English language speaking (p = 0.0095). Patients were more likely to irrigate with larger volumes if they were younger (p = 0.0284), had prior irrigation (p < 0.0001), or had revision surgery (p = 0.0056).

Conclusion

Multiple factors are associated with patient compliance with nasal saline irrigation after FESS. Ethnic and cultural considerations, such as language barriers, should also be considered to improve outcomes. Identification of patients who may be noncompliant could potentially benefit from increased preoperative counseling to improve adherence rates.     

Efficacy of nasal irrigation with 200 μg/mL amphotericin B after functional endoscopic sinus surgery: a randomized,placebo‐controlled,double‐blind study

Background

Previous studies have shown controversial results of topical amphotericin B (AMB) nasal irrigation for chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of 200 μg/mL AMB nasal irrigation as an adjuvant therapy after functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS).

Methods

Patients with CRS who had received FESS for treatment were recruited and assigned to 1 of 2 groups at random at 1 month postsurgery. In the AMB group patients received nasal irrigation with 200 μg/mL of AMB for 2 months on a daily basis. In the control group normal saline irrigation was given instead. Before FESS and before and after nasal irrigation, patients’ sinonasal symptoms were assessed through a questionnaire that was a Taiwanese version of the 22‐item Sino‐Nasal Outcome Test (TWSNOT‐22). In addition, patients received endoscopic examination, acoustic rhinometry, smell test, saccharine transit test, and bacterial cultures obtained from their middle meati.

Results

A total of 73 patients completed the study between December 2014 and January 2017. Among them, 37 received nasal irrigation with AMB solution, and 36 with saline. In the AMB group, scores of TWSNOT‐22 dropped significantly after irrigation compared with before (p = 0.005). In the control group, TWSNOT‐22 scores did not changed after irrigation (p = 0.451). However, there were no significant differences in TWSNOT‐22, endoscopic score, smell test, saccharine transit test, and bacterial culture rate after irrigation between 2 groups.

Conclusion

Our study showed that in post‐FESS care, nasal irrigation with 200 μg/mL of AMB did not provide additional benefit compared with saline irrigation.