Conventional magnetic resonance imaging versus MR arthrography (MRA) of the wrist in the evaluation of triangular fibrocartilage lesions

Objective

The aim of this study is to assess the diagnostic value of direct MR arthrography compared to conventional MR imaging in the diagnosis of different pathologic entities affecting the triangular fibrocartilage.

Subjects and methods

This study included 51 patients complaining of chronic wrist pain. Conventional MRI and MR arthrography (MRA) was done for all cases.

Results

A comparison of the sensitivity of conventional MRI versus MRA was done by correlating the final diagnosis of each modality with the results of arthroscopy. MRI revealed a sensitivity (SEN) of 88.5%, specificity (SPE) of 100%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 100%, and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 69.2%, with an overall accuracy (ACC) of 90.9%, while MRA revealed a SEN of 94.2%, SPE of 100%, PPV of 100%, NPV of 81.8%, and ACC of 95.5%.

Conclusion

MR arthrography is a potent additional tool facilitating the diagnosis of different pathologic entities affecting the triangular fibrocartilage requiring surgical intervention and help to reduce arthroscopic interventions.     

Intrinsic ligament and triangular fibrocartilage complex tears of the wrist: comparison of MDCT arthrography, conventional 3-T MRI, and MR arthrography

Purpose

This study compares the diagnostic performance of multidetector CT arthrography (CTA), conventional 3-T MR and MR arthrography (MRA) in detecting intrinsic ligament and triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) tears of the wrist.

Materials and methods

Ten cadaveric wrists of five male subjects with an average age 49.6 years (range 26–59 years) were evaluated using CTA, conventional 3-T MR and MRA. We assessed the presence of scapholunate ligament (SLL), lunotriquetral ligament (LTL), and TFCC tears using a combination of conventional arthrography and arthroscopy as a gold standard. All images were evaluated in consensus by two musculoskeletal radiologists with sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy being calculated.

Results

Sensitivities/specificity/accuracy of CTA, conventional MRI, and MRA were 100 %/100 %/100 %, 66 %/86 %/80 %, 100 %/86 %/90 % for the detection of SLL tear, 100 %/80 %/90 %, 60 %/80 %/70 %, 100 %/80 %/90 % for the detection of LTL tear, and 100 %/100 %/100 %, 100 %/86 %/90 %, 100 %/100 %/100 % for the detection of TFCC tear. Overall CTA had the highest sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy among the three investigations while MRA performed better than conventional MR. CTA also had the highest sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for identifying which component of the SLL and LTL was torn. Membranous tears of both SLL and LTL were better visualized than dorsal or volar tears on all three imaging modalities.

Conclusion

Both CT and MR arthrography have a very high degree of accuracy for diagnosing tears of the SLL, LTL, and TFCC with both being more accurate than conventional MR imaging.     

The diagnostic value of magnetic resonance arthrography of the shoulder in detection and grading of SLAP lesions: comparison with arthroscopic findings

Purpose

The purpose of the study is to determine the usefulness of magnetic resonance arthrography (MRA) in diagnosis and grading of superior labrum anterior to posterior (SLAP) lesions of the Glenoid Labrum Compared with surgery

Material and methods

This was a prospective study including fifty nine clinically diagnosed SLAP patients. The study was done during the period from January 2008 to June 2010. All patients were submitted to history taking, clinical examination and conventional MRI examination of the shoulder, MRA was done in patients with negative conventional MRI, all of these patients underwent arthroscopy for diagnosis wither open or arthroscopy for diagnosis and treatment and results were compared with MRA findings.

Main outcome measures

Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and overall accuracy of MR arthrography in detection and grading of SLAP lesions of the gelnoid labrum.

Results

Out of fifty nine patients, 25 patients had positive MR findings in conventional MRI, and 34 patients had negative MR findings, who underwent MR arthrography; 10 out of them had normal arthrogram (only 6 of them underwent arthroscopy), 22 had SLAP (superior labrum anterior to posterior) lesions, one had Bankart's lesion and one had internal impingement syndrome. These results were compared with arthroscopy results.The overall sensitivity of MRA in detection of SLAP lesions was 90% while the specificity was 50%, negative predictive value (NPV) was 66.6% and positive predicative value (PPV) was 81.8%. MRA and arthroscopy results were concurrent in 79.3% patients.

Conclusion

MR arthrography is a sensitive minimally invasive technique for detection and grading of SLAP lesions, it can help in avoiding patients unnecessary diagnostic arthroscopy.     

Comparative study of direct MR arthrography and CT arthrography with arthroscopic correlation in preoperative evaluation of anterior shoulder instability

Purpose

To compare direct MR arthrography and CT arthrography for the preoperative planning of shoulder anterior instability.

Patients and methods

47 patients were included in this study. 43 patients with clinical history of anterior GHI or recurrent shoulder pain had no clinical findings of rotator cuff abnormality. They experienced multiple anterior dislocations of the shoulder. No patient showed evidence of multidirectional instability or generalized ligamentous laxity. The remaining 4 patients complained of anterior shoulder instability after anchor repair. All the patients underwent direct CT and MR arthrography. The results of CTA and MRA were compared with results obtained from arthroscopy in each patient to detect the sensitivity and specificity of each modality.

Results

The sensitivity and specificity of CTA for bankart lesion are 89.4% and 96.4% respectively and of MRA 94.7% and 96.4%, for Perthes lesion the sensitivity and specificity of CTA are 33.3% and 100% respectively and of MRA 66.6% and 100%, for ALPSA the sensitivity and specificity of CTA are 85.7% and 97.5% respectively and of MRA 100% and 97.5%, for GLAD the sensitivity and specificity of CTA are 80% and 97.6% respectively and of MRA 60% and 97.6%, for SLAP lesion the sensitivity and specificity of CTA are 100% and 100% respectively and of MRA 100% and 100%, for absent or degenerated labrum the sensitivity and specificity of CTA are 100% and 100% respectively and of MRA 66.6% and 97.7%, for post operative recurrent Bankart lesion the sensitivity and specificity of CTA are 100% and 100% respectively and of MRA 50% and 100%, for bony glenoid fracture the sensitivity and specificity of CTA are 100% and 100% respectively and of MRA 66.6% and 97.5%.

Conclusion

CTA and MRA were equivalent in demonstrating labro-ligamentous and cartilaginous lesions associated with shoulder instability. CTA was superior in detecting post operative instability and glenoid rim osseous lesions that are known to be a decisional element in the surgical strategy. Hence, CTA may be considered a method of choice in the preoperative evaluation of shoulder anterior instability.     

3.0 T conventional hip MR and hip MR arthrography for the acetabular labral tears confirmed by arthroscopy

Objective

To evaluate the value of hip MR for diagnosing acetabular labrum tears, and to further compare the diagnostic performances of conventional MR with MR arthrography in acetabular labrum tears.

Methods

90 patients undergoing both hip MR examination and subsequent hip arthroscopy were retrospectively evaluated. Of these patients, 34 accepted both conventional MR and MR arthrography; while the other 56 only underwent conventional MR examination. All hip MR images were independently reviewed by two radiologists, and further compared with the results of hip arthroscopy.

Results

59 of 90 patients were confirmed with acetabular labral tears by hip arthroscopy and 31 without tears. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of conventional MR for evaluating the acetabular labral tears were 61.0%, 77.4%, 83.7% and 51.1% (radiologist A), and 66.1%, 74.2%, 82.9% and 53.4% (radiologist B), respectively, with good consistency between the two observers (K = 0.645). The sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of MR arthrography for assessing the acetabular labral tears were 90.5%, 84.6%, 90.5% and 84.6% (radiologist A), and 95.2%, 84.6%, 90.9% and 91.7% (radiologist B), respectively, with excellent good consistency between the two observers (K = 0.810). The sensitivity and NPV of MR arthrography for diagnosing the acetabular labral tears were significantly higher than those of conventional MR (both P < 0.05).

Conclusion

Hip MR arthrography is a reliable evaluation modality for diagnosing the acetabular labral tears, and its diagnostic performance is superior to that of conventional MR at 3.0 T.     

CT arthrography of the wrist using a novel, mobile, dedicated extremity cone-beam CT (CBCT)

Purpose

To evaluate the feasibility and intra- and interobserver agreement of CBCT arthrography of wrist ligaments, triangular fibrocartilaginous complex (TFCC), and to assess the sensitivity (SE), specificity (SP), accuracy (ACC), and positive and negative predictive value (PPV, NPV) of CBCT arthrography in the diagnosis of scapholunate (SLL) and lunotriquetral (LTL) ligament tears, TFCC, and cartilage abnormalities of the scaphoid and lunate with their corresponding radial surfaces (scaphoid and lunate fossa) using a novel, mobile, dedicated extremity CBCT scanner.

Materials and methods

Fifty-two consecutively enrolled subjects (26 M, 26 F, mean age 38 years, range 18–66 years) with suspected wrist ligament tears underwent CBCT-arthrography before normally scheduled MR arthrography.An extremity CBCT was used for imaging with isotropic voxel size of 0.4 × 0.4 × 0.4 mm³. Subsequent routine 1.5 T MRI was performed using a dedicated wrist coil.Two observers reviewed the anonymized CBCT images twice for contrast enhancement (CE) and technical details (TD), for tears of the SLL, LTL, and TFCC. Also, cartilage abnormalities of the scaphoid and lunate with their corresponding radial surfaces (scaphoid and lunate fossa) were evaluated. Inter- and intraobserver agreement was determined using weighted kappa statistics. Since no surgery was performed, MRI served as a reference standard, and SE and SP, ACC, PPV, and NPV were calculated.

Results

Intra- and interobserver kappa values for both readers (reader 1/reader 2; first reading/second reading) with 95 % confidence limits were: CE 0.54 (0.08–1.00)/ 0.75 (0.46–1.00); 0.73 (0.29–1.00)/ 0.45 (0.07–0.83), TD 0.53 (0.30–0.88)/ 0.86 (0.60–1.00); 0.56 (0.22–0.91)/ 0.67 (0.37–0.98), SLL 0.59 (0.25–0.93)/ 0.66 (0.42–0.91); 0.31 (0.06–0.56)/ 0.49 (0.26–0.73), LTL 0.83 (0.66–1.00)/ 0.68 (0.46–0.91); 0.90 (0.79–1.00)/ 0.48 (0.22–0.74); TFCC (0.72–1.00)/ (0.79–1.00); 0.65 (0.43–0.87)/ 0.59 (0.35–0.83), radius (scaphoid fossa) 0.45 (0.12–0.77)/ 0.64 (0.31–0.96); 0.58 (0.19–0.96)/ 0.38 (0.09–0.66), scaphoid 0.43 (0.12–0.74)/ 0.76 (0.55–0.96); 0.37 (0.00–0.75)/ 0.32 (0.04–0.59), radius (lunate fossa) 0.68 (0.36–1.00)/ 0.42 (0.00–0.86); 0.62 (0.29–0.96)/ 0.51 (0.12–0.91), and lunate 0.53 (0.16–0.90)/ 0.68 (0.44–0.91); 0.59 (0.29–0.88)/ 0.42 (0.00–0.84), respectively. The overall mean accuracy was 82–92 % and specificity was 81–94 %. Sensitivity for LTL and TFCC tears was 76–83, but for SLL tears it was 58 %. For cartilage abnormalities, the accuracy and negative predictive value were high, 90–98 %.

Conclusions

A dedicated CBCT extremity scanner is a new method for evaluating the wrist ligaments and radiocarpal cartilage. The method has an overall accuracy of 82–86 % and specificity 81–91 %. For cartilage abnormalities, the accuracy and negative predictive value were high.     

The value of multi-detector CT arthrography of the wrist joint in evaluation of ligamentous and capsular injuries in post-traumatic pain

The wrist joint is a complex joint containing several intrinsic and extrinsic ligaments that contribute to carpal stability. There is increased incidence of ligamentous/capsular injury following trauma.

Comparison of 3.0-T MR vs 3.0-T MR arthrography of the hip for detection of acetabular labral tears and chondral defects in the same patient population

Objective:

We report our experience in diagnostic sensitivity of 3.0-T conventional MR vs 3.0-T MR arthrography of the hip for detection of acetabular labral tears and chondral defects in the same patient population.

Methods:

43 consecutive patients had both conventional hip MR and MR arthrography examinations performed. These examinations were reviewed retrospectively by independent reading of two musculoskeletal radiologists who read the MR and MR arthrogram examinations in a randomized fashion (i.e. MR and MR arthrogram examinations were read at separate sittings and in a randomized fashion so as not to bias reviewers). Scans were assessed for acetabular labral tears and chondral defects. All patients went on to arthroscopy.

Results:

Of these 43 patients, 40 had acetabular labral tears read by Reader 1 and 39 had acetabular labral tears read by Reader 2 on MR arthrogram, 39 had acetabular labral tears read by Reader 1 and 38 had acetabular labral tears read by Reader 2 on conventional MR examination. There were 42 labral tears in 43 patients at arthroscopy. There were four false-negative labral tears compared with arthroscopy on MR and three false negatives on MR arthrography for Reader 1 and five false negatives on MR and four false negatives on MR arthrography for Reader 2. Each reader had one false-positive labral tear compared with arthroscopy on both MR and MR arthrography. There were 32 acetabular chondral defects at arthroscopy. Reader 1 saw 21 acetabular chondral defects on conventional MR and 27 chondral defects at MR arthrography. Reader 2 saw 19 acetabular chondral defects at conventional MR and 25 acetabular chondral defects on MR arthrography. There were no false-positive readings of chondral defects compared with arthroscopy on MR and one false positive for Reader 1 and two false positives for Reader 2 on MR arthrography as compared with arthroscopy. On conventional MR examination, sensitivities and specificities as compared with arthroscopy were as follows: Reader 1 acetabular labral tear (90% sensitivity, 0% specificity) and Reader 2 acetabular labral tear (88% sensitivity, 0% sensitivity). On MR arthrogram, sensitivities and specificities as compared with arthroscopy for Reader 1 were 93%, 0% and for Reader 2 were 90%, 0%, respectively. Sensitivities and specificities for detection of acetabular chondral defects as compared with arthroscopy were Reader 1 conventional MR (65% sensitivity, 100% specificity), Reader 1 MR arthrography (81% sensitivity, 91% specificity), Reader 2 conventional MR (59% sensitivity, 100% specificity) and Reader 2 MR arthrography (71% sensitivity, 82% specificity).

Conclusion:

In this series, 3.0-T MR demonstrated sensitivity for detection of acetabular labral tears that rivals the sensitivity of 3.0-T MR arthrography of the hip. In this series, 3.0-T MR arthrography was more sensitive than conventional 3.0-T MR for detection of acetabular chondral defects.

Advances in knowledge:

3.0-T MR and MR arthrography are near equivalent in the diagnosis of acetabular labral tears. This information is useful for pre-operative planning.MR arthrography has been reported to be more sensitive and specific for detection of acetabular labral tears in the hip than conventional MRI.^1–10 MR arthrography has also been reported to be superior in detection of acetabular cartilage defects as compared with conventional MRI.¹¹ To our knowledge 3.0-T MR vs 3.0-T MR arthrography sensitivity for detection of acetabular labral tears and chondral defects has not been specifically assessed.To our knowledge, Petersilge et al¹ first reported the utility of hip MR arthrography in the diagnosis of acetabular labral tears. Toomayan et al² compared MR arthrography of the hip with conventional MRI of the hip in different patient populations. He found MR arthrography with a small field of view to be substantially more sensitive for detection of acetabular labral tears than conventional MRI. Sutter et al¹¹ found 1.5 T MR arthrography to be superior to conventional MRI for detecting labral tears and acetabular cartilage defects.Patients with acetabular labral tears present with symptoms of persistent pain, clicking, locking and decreased range of motion. With the availability of hip arthroscopy, labral tears can more easily be addressed with minimally invasive surgery. Accurate pre-operative identification of labral tears is needed.² Based on previous studies demonstrating the accuracy of MR arthrography in detection of acetabular labral tears, surgeons often request MR arthrography of the hip to characterize labral tears prior to surgery.^1–10 The purpose of this study is to assess 3.0-T MR vs MR arthrography diagnostic performance in detection of acetabular labral tears and chondral defects in the same patient population using arthroscopy as a reference standard.     

The added value of ABER position for the detection and classification of anteroinferior labroligamentous lesions in MR arthrography of the shoulder

Purpose

The purpose of this study is to compare MR arthrography in abduction and external rotation (ABER) position with conventional MR arthrography in neutral position for the detection and further classification of anteroinferior labroligamentous lesions.

Materials and methods

Two hundred and twenty-nine cases of shoulder MR arthrography with subsequent arthroscopy were retrospectively evaluated. All MR arthrograms in ABER position and neutral position were independently assessed by two radiologists who were blinded to the arthroscopic findings. Sensitivities and specificities of both positions for detection and further categorization of anteroinferior labroligamentous lesions were calculated and compared using paired McNemar test. K values were calculated to quantify the level of interobserver agreement.

Results

At arthroscopy, 24 Bankart lesions, 59 ALPSA lesions, 39 Perthes lesions, 8 GLAD lesions, 4 ALIPSA lesions, 31 nonclassifiable lesions and 60 intact anteroinferior complexes were found. The sensitivity of MR arthrography in ABER position for detecting anteroinferior labroligamentous lesions was significantly higher than that of in neutral position (92.7–94.5% versus 81.8–83%, P < 0.05). For the detection rate of the mentioned 6 subtypes of lesions, only the Perthes lesions had significant improvement in ABER position when compared with conventional MR arthrography (observer 1, 61.5–87.2%, P = 0.006; observer 2, 69.2–92.3%, P = 0.004). MR arthrography in ABER position was more effective in identifying of Perthes lesions (66.7–74.4% versus 35.9–40%, P < 0.05) while the conventional MR arthrography was more effective in accurate diagnose of ALPSA lesions (74.6–78.0% versus 54.2–55.9%, P < 0.05). No statistically significant difference of the diagnostic accuracy was found between the two positions for Bankart lesions, GLAD lesions, and ALIPSA lesions.

Conclusion

MR arthrography in ABER position has more added value on detection of Perthes lesions in evaluation of anteroinferior labroligamentous complex tear.     

Arterial spin-labeling MR imaging in moyamoya disease compared with clinical assessments and other MR imaging finings

Purpose

Our purpose was to identify the causal factors for the perfusion distribution obtained with ASL-MRI by comparing ASL-MRI with clinical information and other MRI findings in moyamoya disease.

Methods

Seventy-one patients with moyamoya disease underwent ASL-MRI and other MRI, including fluid-attenuated inversion recovery imaging (FLAIR) and three-dimensional time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) on 3.0-Tesla MRI system. Cerebral blood flow (CBF) values (ASL values) for the cerebral hemispheres (142 sides) were measured on CBF maps generated by ASL-MRI. Relationships between the ASL values and the following 9 factors were assessed: sex, family history, revascularization surgery, age at MR exam, age at onset, the steno-occlusive severity on MRA (MRA score), degree of basal collaterals, degree of leptomeningeal high signal intensity seen on FLAIR, and size of ischemic or hemorrhagic cerebrovascular accident lesion (CVA score).

Results

Patients with a family history had significantly higher ASL values than those without such a history. There were significant negative correlations between ASL values and age at MR exam, MRA score, and CVA score.

Conclusions

ASL-MRI may have cause-and-effect or mutual associations with family history, current patient age, size of CVA lesion, and intracranial arterial steno-occlusive severity in Moyamoya disease.     

Feasibility and preliminary results of SPECT/CT arthrography of the wrist in comparison with MR arthrography in patients with suspected ulnocarpal impaction

Purpose

To evaluate the feasibility and performance of SPECT/CT arthrography of the wrist in comparison with MR arthrography in patients with suspected ulnocarpal impaction.

Methods

This prospective study included 28 wrists of 27 patients evaluated with SPECT/CT arthrography and MR arthrography. Iodine contrast medium and gadolinium were injected into the distal radioulnar and midcarpal joints. Late-phase SPECT/CT was performed 3.5 h after intravenous injection of approximately 650 MBq ^99mTc-DPD. MR and SPECT/CT images were separately reviewed in relation to bone marrow oedema, radionuclide uptake, and tears in the scapholunate (SL) and lunotriquetral (LT) ligaments and triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC), and an overall diagnosis of ulnar impaction. MR, CT and SPECT/CT imaging findings were compared with each other, with the surgical findings in 12 patients and with clinical follow-up.

Results

The quality of MR arthrography and SPECT/CT arthrography images was fully diagnostic in 23 of 28 wrists (82 %) and 25 of 28 wrists (89 %), respectively. SPECT/CT arthrography was not diagnostic for ligament lesions due to insufficient intraarticular contrast in one wrist. MR and SPECT/CT images showed concordant findings regarding TFCC lesions in 22 of 27 wrists (81 %), SL ligament in 22 of 27 wrists (81 %) and LT ligament in 23 of 27 wrists (85 %). Bone marrow oedema on MR images and scintigraphic uptake were concordant in 21 of 28 wrists (75 %). MR images showed partial TFCC defects in four patients with normal SPECT/CT images. MR images showed bone marrow oedema in 4 of 28 wrists (14 %) without scintigraphic uptake, and scintigraphic uptake was present without MR bone marrow oedema in three wrists (11 %). Regarding diagnosis of ulnar impaction the concordance rate between CT and SPECT/CT was 100 % and reached 96 % (27 of 28) between MR and SPECT/CT arthrography. The sensitivity and specificity of MR, CT and SPECT/CT arthrography were 93 %, 100 % and 100 %, and 93 %, 93 % and 93 %, respectively.

Conclusion

SPECT/CT arthrography of the wrist is feasible. Regarding diagnosis of ulnar impaction we found a high concordance with MR arthrography. SPECT/CT arthrography of the wrist is an alternative to MR arthrography in patients with contraindications to MR imaging.     

3-T direct MR arthrography of the wrist: Value of finger trap distraction to assess intrinsic ligament and triangular fibrocartilage complex tears

Purpose

To determine the value of applying finger trap distraction during direct MR arthrography of the wrist to assess intrinsic ligament and triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) tears.

Materials and methods

Twenty consecutive patients were prospectively investigated by three-compartment wrist MR arthrography. Imaging was performed with 3-T scanners using a three-dimensional isotropic (0.4 mm) T1-weighted gradient-recalled echo sequence, with and without finger trap distraction (4 kg). In a blind and independent fashion, two musculoskeletal radiologists measured the width of the scapholunate (SL), lunotriquetral (LT) and ulna-TFC (UTFC) joint spaces. They evaluated the amount of contrast medium within these spaces using a four-point scale, and assessed SL, LT and TFCC tears, as well as the disruption of Gilula's carpal arcs.

Results

With finger trap distraction, both readers found a significant increase in width of the SL space (mean Δ = +0.1 mm, p ≤ 0.040), and noticed more contrast medium therein (p ≤ 0.035). In contrast, the differences in width of the LT (mean Δ = +0.1 mm, p ≥ 0.057) and UTFC (mean Δ = 0 mm, p ≥ 0.728) spaces, as well as the amount of contrast material within these spaces were not statistically significant (p = 0.607 and ≥0.157, respectively). Both readers detected more SL (Δ = +1, p = 0.157) and LT (Δ = +2, p = 0.223) tears, although statistical significance was not reached, and Gilula's carpal arcs were more frequently disrupted during finger trap distraction (Δ = +5, p = 0.025).

Conclusion

The application of finger trap distraction during direct wrist MR arthrography may enhance both detection and characterisation of SL and LT ligament tears by widening the SL space and increasing the amount of contrast within the SL and LT joint spaces.     

Comparative reliability and diagnostic performance of conventional 3T magnetic resonance imaging and 1.5T magnetic resonance arthrography for the evaluation of internal derangement of the hip

Objective

To compare the diagnostic accuracy of conventional 3T MRI against 1.5T MR arthrography (MRA) in patients with clinical femoroacetabular impingement (FAI).

Methods

Sixty-eight consecutive patients with clinical FAI underwent both 1.5T MRA and 3T MRI. Imaging was prospectively analysed by two musculoskeletal radiologists, blinded to patient outcomes and scored for internal derangement including labral and cartilage abnormality. Interobserver variation was assessed by kappa analysis. Thirty-nine patients subsequently underwent hip arthroscopy and surgical results and radiology findings were analysed.

Results

Both readers had higher sensitivities for detecting labral tears with 3T MRI compared to 1.5T MRA (not statistically significant p=0.07). For acetabular cartilage defect both readers had higher statistically significant sensitivities using 3T MRI compared to 1.5T MRA (p=0.02). Both readers had a slightly higher sensitivity for detecting delamination with 1.5T MRA compared to 3T MRI, but these differences were not statistically significant (p=0.66). Interobserver agreement was substantial to perfect agreement for all parameters except the identification of delamination (3T MRI showed moderate agreement and 1.5T MRA substantial agreement).

Conclusion

Conventional 3T MRI may be at least equivalent to 1.5T MRA in detecting acetabular labrum and possibly superior to 1.5T MRA in detecting cartilage defects in patients with suspected FAI.

Key Points

? Conventional 3T MRI is equivalent to 1.5T MRA for diagnosing labral tears. ? Conventional 3T MRI is superior to 1.5T MRA for diagnosing acetabular cartilage defect. ? Conventional 3T MRI is equivalent to 1.5T MRA for diagnosing cartilage delamination. ? Symptom severity score was significantly higher (p<0.05) in group proceeding to surgery.

     

MR imaging of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction poor outcomes

Purpose

Is to study the diagnostic value of MR imaging in assessment of poor outcomes of ACL reconstruction using second look arthroscopy of the knee as a gold standard.

Patients and methods

51 patients were included in this study who did ACL reconstruction followed by MRI and second look arthroscopy. Arthroscopy study was performed within 7–15 days from MR examination. The time interval between ACL reconstruction and MRI examination was 10 months to 9 years. MR images were evaluated for; (1) ACL graft failure assessing the primary and secondary signs, (2) Tibial and femoral tunnel location, and (3) Complication of ACL graft reconstruction. MR imaging results were compared with the arthroscopic results.

Results

Second look arthroscopy revealed 23 patients with full- thickness ACL graft tears, 17 partial -thickness ACL graft tears and 11 intact ACL grafts. Complete ACL graft discontinuity, focal ACL graft thinning and preserved 100% graft thickness were the most valuable primary MRI signs in the diagnosis of full thickness ACL graft tear, partial tear and intact graft respectively.

Conclusion

We found MR imaging to be reliable for the evaluation of ACL graft poor outcomes including graft failure and complications.     

The carpal ligaments in MR arthrography of the wrist: correlation with standard MRI and wrist arthroscopy

We assessed the value of three-compartment magnetic resonance (MR) wrist arthrography in comparison with non-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the evaluation of 13 individual wrist ligaments in 35 patients with refractory wrist pain. In 20 of these patients MR findings were correlated with the findings from multiportal wrist arthroscopy. For MR imaging (1.5-T magnet) a three-dimensional volume acquisition with a gradient-recalled echo sequence and 0.6-1.0 mm effective slice thickness was used. The delineation of individual wrist ligaments was rated as "good" in 10% of non-enhanced MR and 90% of MR arthrography images. Ligament evaluation was possible with high diagnostic confidence in 11% by non-enhanced MR imaging and 90% by MR arthrography. With wrist arthroscopy as the standard of reference, average sensitivities/specificities/accuracies for the diagnosis of full-thickness ligamentous defects were 0.81/0.75/0.77 for non-enhanced MR imaging and 0.97/0.96/0.96 for MR arthrography. Our findings suggest that MR arthrography is more accurate than standard MRI in delineating and evaluating the ligaments of the wrist.     

Ultrasonographic and MR diagnosis of rotator cuff disorders & shoulder joint instability

Objective

To evaluate the role and efficacy of U/S and MR in diagnosis of rotator cuff disorders and shoulder joint instability.

Patients and methods

This study included 30 patients with shoulder pain and/or movement limitation. They underwent shoulder U/S examination followed by MR examination. The U/S & MR diagnostic criteria of each patient were analyzed, compared and correlated with arthroscopic and/or orthopedic surgical findings.

Results

15 patients had with rotator cuff disorders 15/30 (50%) and 11 patients had shoulder instability 11/30 (36.7%). Out of 15 patients with rotator cuff disorders, 12 patients had rotator cuff tears 12/15 (80%) and 3 patients had tendenosis 3/15(20%). The supraspinatus muscle was involved in all cases (100%), without a significant comparable difference between U/S and MR. Out of 11 patients with shoulder instability 8 patients had anterior labral tear 8/11 (72.7%); 2 patients had superior labral tear 2/11 (18.2%) and only one patient with posterior labral tear.

Conclusion

U/S and MRI are valid diagnostic modalities in detecting, characterizing and discriminating the rotator cuff disorders, with no significant comparable difference. U/S has many challenges in patients with shoulder instability, while MR provides accurate diagnosis even without contrast.     

Triangular fibrocartilage and intercarpal ligaments of the wrist: Does MR arthrography improve standard MRI?

The objective of this study was to assess the value of adding MR arthrography to standard MRI for patients with chronic wrist disorders. Thirty consecutive patients (age range, 19–73 years; mean, 36.2 years) were included in the investigation. The images were evaluated blindly and separately by two radiologists with regard to lesions of the scapholunate (SL) and lunotriquetral (LT) ligaments and the triangular fibrocartilage (TFC). Conventional two- or three-compartment arthrography was used as the standard of reference. For TFC lesions, standard MR images had a sensitivity of 92.3% (reader 1) and 84.6% (reader 2) and a specificity of 41.2% (reader 1) and 52.9% (reader 2). For MR arthrography, sensitivity was 84.6% (reader 1) and 84.6% (reader 2) and specificity was 88.2% (reader 1) and 100% (reader 2). For SL ligament tears, standard MRI had a sensitivity of 33.3% (reader 1) and 11.1% (reader 2) and a specificity of 47.6% (reader 1) and 57.1% (reader 2). For MR arthrography, sensitivity was 66.7% (reader 1) and 55.6% (reader 2) and specificity was 52.4% (reader 1) and 81.0% (reader 2). For LT ligament tears, standard MRI had a sensitivity of 28.6% (reader 1) and 35.7% (reader 2) and a specificity of 93.8% (reader 1) and 81.3% (reader 2). For MR arthrography, sensitivity was 35.7% (reader 1) and 23.1% (reader 2) and specificity was 93.8% (reader 1) and 94.1% (reader 2). In conclusion, the diagnostic performance of MRI in suspected lesions of the TFC and the SL and LT ligaments is improved by adding MR arthrography to the standard examination.     

The scapholunate interosseous ligament in MR arthrography of the wrist: correlation with non-enhanced MRI and wrist arthroscopy

 Objective. To compare three-compartment MR wrist arthrography with non-enhanced MRI in correlation with wrist arthroscopy, and to evaluate the potential of MR arthrography for consistently visualizing all parts of the scapholunate interosseous ligament of the wrist (SLIL) and exactly diagnosing the site and extent of SLIL defects. Design and Patients. In 41 patients with wrist pain (34 patients with wrist pain for more than 6 months) plain radiographs, stress views, non-enhanced MRI and three-compartment MR arthrography were done within 2 h of each other, using three-dimensional volume acquisition (0.6–1.0 mm effective slice thickness) with a gradient-recalled echo sequence and a 1.5-T magnet. The MR arthrography findings were compared with the findings from non-enhanced MRI and correlated with the arthroscopic findings in all patients. Results. The dorsal, central and palmar segments of the SLIL could be delineated exactly by MR arthrography in 95% of the patients; with non-enhanced MRI only 28% of SLIL segments were seen consistently. Demonstration of SLIL defects was possible with high diagnostic confidence in 42% of SLIL segments by non-enhanced MRI and in 94% by MR arthrography. With wrist arthroscopy as the standard of reference, sensitivity and specificity values for SLIL perforations were 52%/34% for non-enhanced MRI and 90%/87% for MR arthrography. Conclusions. MR arthrography, using three-dimensional volume acquisition with thin slices (0.6–1.0 mm), combines the advantages of three-compartment arthrography and non-enhanced MRI. It shows the precise location and magnitude of ligamentous defects of all parts of the SLIL, correlates well with wrist arthroscopy and has potential implications for diagnosis and treatment planning.     

Fat-suppressed volume isotropic turbo spin echo acquisition (VISTA) MR imaging in evaluating radial and root tears of the meniscus: Focusing on reader-defined axial reconstruction

Objective

To assess the diagnostic value of fat-suppressed (FS) three-dimensional (3D) volume isotropic turbo spin echo acquisition (VISTA) imaging in detecting radial and root tears of the meniscus, including the reader-defined reformatted axial (RDA) plane.

Materials and methods

Twenty-three patients with arthroscopically confirmed radial or root tears of the meniscus underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with 2D and FS 3D VISTA sequences. MRIs were reviewed independently by two musculoskeletal radiologists blinded to the arthroscopic findings. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and interobserver agreement were calculated for radial and root tears. Both radiologists reported confidence scale for the presence of meniscal tears in 2D axial imaging, 3D axial imaging, and RDA imaging, based on a five-point scale. Wilcoxon's signed rank test was used to compare confidence scale.

Results

The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of FS 3D VISTA MR imaging versus 2D MR imaging were as follows: 96%, 96%, and 96% versus 91%, 91%, and 91%, respectively in reader 1, and 96%, 96%, and 96% versus 83%, 91%, and 87%, respectively, in reader 2. Interobserver agreement for detecting meniscal tears was excellent (κ = 1) with FS 3D VISTA. The confidence scale was significantly higher for 3D axial images than 2D imaging (p = 0.03) and significantly higher in RDA images than 3D axial image in detecting radial and root tears.

Conclusions

FS 3D VISTA had a better diagnostic performance in evaluating radial and root tears of the meniscus. The reader-defined reformatted axial plane obtained from FS 3D VISTA MR imaging is useful in detecting radial and root tears of the meniscus.     

Comparisons of the Various Partial-Thickness Rotator Cuff Tears on MR Arthrography and Arthroscopic Correlation

Objective

To assess the diagnostic performance of MR arthrography in the diagnosis of the various types of partial-thickness rotator cuff tears by comparing the MR imaging findings with the arthroscopic findings.

Materials and Methods

The series of MR arthrography studies included 202 patients consisting of 100 patients with partial-thickness rotator cuff tears proved by arthroscopy and a control group of 102 patients with arthroscopically intact rotator cuffs, which were reviewed in random order. At arthroscopy, 54 articular-sided, 26 bursal-sided, 20 both articular- and bursal-sided partial-thickness tears were diagnosed. The MR arthrographies were analyzed by two radiologists for articular-sided tears, bursal-sided tears, and both articular- and bursal-sided tears of the rotator cuff. The sensitivity and specificity of each type of partial-thickness tears were determined. Kappa statistics was calculated to determine the inter- and intra-observer agreement of the diagnosis of partial-thickness rotator cuff tears.

Results

The sensitivity and specificity of the various types of rotator cuff tears were 85% and 90%, respectively for articular-sided tears, 62% and 95% for bursal-sided tears, as well as 45% and 99% for both articular- and bursal-sided tears. False-negative assessments were primarily observed in the diagnosis of bursal-sided tears. Conversely, both articular- and bursal-sided tears were overestimated as full-thickness tears. Inter-observer agreement was excellent for the diagnosis of articular-sided tears (k = 0.70), moderate (k = 0.59) for bursal-sided tears, and fair (k = 0.34) for both articular- and bursal-sided tears, respectively. Intra-observer agreement for the interpretation of articular- and bursal-sided tears was excellent and good, respectively, whereas intra-observer agreement for both articular- and bursal-sided tears was moderate.

Conclusion

MR arthrography is a useful diagnostic tool for partial-thickness rotator cuff tears, but has limitations in that it has low sensitivity in bursal- and both articular- and bursal-sided tears. In addition, it shows only fair inter-observer agreement when it comes to predicting both articular- and bursal-sided tears.