The needs of patients receiving depot antipsychotic medication within primary care

BACKGROUND: Depot antipsychotic medication is a vital treatment for many people with schizophrenia. Many patients receive this medication from primary care, and have little or no contact with specialist mental health services. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to compare the characteristics and needs of patients receiving depot medication within primary care with those receiving their medication from specialist mental health services. METHODS: A total of 58 patients were identified from four primary care teams. Data were collected from medical records, and staff interviews were conducted using standardized interview schedules. RESULTS: Patients receiving medication from primary care had more than twice as many health and social needs compared with those receiving medication from specialist services. CONCLUSIONS: There are advantages for patients to receive depot medication from primary care, but the needs of the patients must be reviewed regularly, and primary care staff must have easy access to specialist mental health services.     

Managing epilepsy in the primary care network in Brazil: are health professionals prepared?]

OBJECTIVE: To assess attitudes and beliefs concerning epilepsy held by physicians and allied health professionals who work in the primary care network in Brazil. METHODS: The data were collected during a national family and community medicine conference held in Rio de Janeiro in 2004, which was attended by 1,200 health professionals from throughout the country. Two questionnaires were used, one for physicians and another for nonphysician health workers. RESULTS: A total of 598 conference participants (345 physicians and 253 nonphysician health professionals) completed a questionnaire. Both the physicians and the nonphysician health professionals had acceptable personal attitudes towards persons with epilepsy. According to data from 286 physicians who provided information, the estimated mean percentage of individuals with epilepsy in the populations cared for by the physicians' health care systems in the preceding year was 0.78% (range, 0 to 8%; median = 0.37%). The estimated mean percentage of seizure-free patients was 60%. The estimated mean percentage of persons on monotherapy was 55%. The estimated mean percentage of referrals to a neurologist was 59%. The estimated mean percentage of patients who were working or studying was 56%. Of the 345 physicians, 252 of them (73%) reported not feeling confident about managing individuals with epilepsy, whereas 84 (24%) felt confident, and 9 (3%) were not sure. Of the 252 physicians who did not feel confident, 226 (90%) said that they would participate in a training program to improve the quality of the care provided to individuals with epilepsy. CONCLUSIONS: The professionals participating in the study indicated that the primary care system has the essential elements needed to provide comprehensive epilepsy care, including professional personnel who want to improve their skills. However, establishing an efficient, effective program of epilepsy management in the primary care network will require an effective referral network, regular distribution of antiepileptic drugs, the close monitoring of epilepsy management by using the federal primary health information system, and the ongoing education of health professionals, with emphasis on psychological support and the inclusion in society of individuals with epilepsy.     

The role of gynaecologists in women's health care--women's views.

OBJECTIVE: Reproductive matters are common reasons to use health services, and both primary care providers (general practitioners and public health nurses) and specialists (gynaecologists) can be consulted. The purpose of this study was to find out how Finnish women think about and use specialist care in reproductive matters; gynaecological health checks, contraception, and prenatal care served as examples. METHODS: The data come from a questionnaire survey sent in 1994 to a representative sample (74% response rate) of 18-44-year-old Finnish women (n=2189). RESULTS: Most (87%) women considered regular health checks by a gynaecologist important, and 55% had visited a gynaecologist regularly in the past 5 years. Healthier women and women having more education were more likely to visit gynaecologists regularly. Most women (86%) preferred a gynaecologist to a general practitioner for contraceptive matters, and 54% reported visiting one for their last contraceptive visit. Maternity centres with their public health nurses and general practitioners were the main source of prenatal care. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest the need to study the benefits of regular gynaecological health checks, and to define the best provider in common reproductive matters. Evaluation should include organizational impacts, such as those of the division of work between primary and secondary health care and small area population responsibility.     

Health status of veterans found ineligible for ongoing outpatient care

In patient's declared ineligible for longitudinal outpatient care in the Veterans Administration (VA) health care system, it is unclear how health status changes after discharge from the VA or how many patients find a regular provider of care in the private sector. Among 65 patients declared ineligible for longitudinal care at the Gainesville VA Medical Center (GVAMC), 28 (43%) continued to use this facility as their primary source of general medical care. Patients who lived within 50 miles of GVAMC or had used this facility frequently in the past were more likely to return to GVAMC for their general care. In the 37 patients who no longer used GVAMC for general care, 42% could not identify a regular provider of care outside GVAMC nine months after their discharge from this facility. Thirty-six percent had not seen a non-VA physician during this time, and 44% felt their health had worsened since they were released from GVAMC. A large number of patients who are declared ineligible for longitudinal care in the VA system continue to use the VA system for primary care. Among those who stop using the VA, many do not receive any medical care or obtain a regular care provider within the first nine months after their release from the VA system.John Meuleman, M.D. is with the Veterans Administration Medical Center, Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center (182), Gainesville, FL 32602.Marcia Mounts, M.D. is a Fellow at the Geriatric Medicine Program of the Veterans Administration Medical Center in Gainesville, FL 32602.     

Do patients want to disclose psychological problems to GPs?

BACKGROUND: GPs are an accessible health care provider for most patients with mental disorders and are gatekeepers to specialist care. The extent to which patients consider their primary care team as relevant to their mental health problems needs to be explored. OBJECTIVES: To explore reasons why patients choose not to disclose psychological problems to GPs, and to discuss the implications for the provision of primary mental health care. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey of consecutive patients attending general practices in New Zealand (part of the MaGPIe study). Patients were screened using the GHQ-12 and a stratified sample participated in a structured in-depth interview to assess their psychological health. Non-disclosure of psychological problems was explored. GPs assessed patients' psychological health using a 5-point scale of severity. RESULTS: Seventy GPs (90%) and 775 patients (70%) participated. Overall, 29.8% of all patients and 36.9% of patients with current symptoms reported non-disclosure of self-perceived psychological problems. Younger patients, those consulting more frequently and those with greater psychiatric disability were more likely to report non-disclosure. The most frequently given reasons were beliefs that a GP is not the 'right' person to talk to (33.8%) or that mental health problems should not be discussed at all (27.6%). CONCLUSIONS: Interventions such as screening and GP education may be ineffective in improving primary mental health care unless accompanied by educational programmes for the general public to increase mental health literacy, de-stigmatise mental illness and increase awareness of general practice as an appropriate and effective source of health care.     

Heart failure patients¿ experiences with continuity of care and its relation to medication adherence: a cross-sectional study

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: A growing number of health care providers are nowadays involved in heart failure care. This could lead to discontinuity and fragmentation of care, thus reducing trust and hence poorer medication adherence. This study aims to explore heart failure patients' experiences with continuity of care, and its relation to medication adherence. METHODS: We collected data from 327 primary care patients with chronic heart failure. Experienced continuity of care was measured using a patient questionnaire and by reviewing patients' medical records. Continuity of care was defined as a multidimensional concept including personal continuity (seeing the same doctor every time), team continuity (collaboration between care providers in general practice) and cross-boundary continuity (collaboration between general practice and hospital). Medication adherence was measured using a validated patient questionnaire. The relation between continuity of care and medication adherence was analysed by using chi-square tests. RESULTS: In total, 53% of patients stated not seeing any care provider in general practice in the last year concerning their heart failure. Of the patients who did contact a care provider in general practice, 46% contacted two or more care providers. Respectively 38% and 51% of patients experienced the highest levels of team and cross-boundary continuity. In total, 14% experienced low levels of team continuity and 11% experienced low levels of cross-boundary continuity. Higher scores on personal continuity were significantly related to better medication adherence (p < 0.01). No clear relation was found between team- or cross-boundary continuity and medication adherence. CONCLUSIONS: A small majority of patients that contacted a care provider in general practice for their heart failure, contacted only one care provider. Most heart failure patients experienced high levels of collaboration between care providers in general practice and between GP and cardiologist. However, in a considerable number of patients, continuity of care could still be improved. Efforts to improve personal continuity may lead to better medication adherence.     

Revealing the Prevalence and Consequences of Food Insecurity in Children with Epilepsy

Food insecurity (FI) affects more than one in five American children and is increasingly addressed during pediatric primary care. Its relevance during subspecialty care, including in the treatment of chronic conditions like epilepsy, is largely unknown. This study sought to determine the FI prevalence among children with epilepsy and examine the relationship between FI and healthcare utilization, health-related quality-of-life (HR-QOL), and medication side effect control. This was a retrospective cohort study using electronic health record data from children, aged 2–17 years, seen for epilepsy management at an academic pediatric hospital. The primary predictor was household FI status, determined using a validated screening tool employed in the hospital’s pediatric neurology clinics. The primary outcome was unplanned healthcare utilization in the 6 months following initial FI screen. Secondary outcomes were standardized, validated assessments of HR-QOL and epilepsy medication side effects. Nearly 14% of the 691 children seen in the clinics for epilepsy lived in food insecure households. The impact of FI on healthcare utilization varied by race. For Caucasians, healthcare utilization rates were significantly higher among food insecure individuals than food secure individuals (37 vs. 17%, p?=?0.003). Among African Americans, healthcare utilization rates did not vary with food security status (p?=?0.6). Children in food insecure households had lower HR-QOL (p?<?0.0001) and higher medication side effects (p?=?0.0005). FI is common among children with epilepsy and may influence adverse health outcomes. Further exploration into how FI and other social determinants influence management of and determine outcomes for chronic diseases is warranted.     

The neurosurgical treatment of epilepsy

Despite the new advancements in antiepileptic drug development, thousands of people with epilepsy will remain intractable to medication. For a considerable proportion of these people, epilepsy surgery is a consideration for better control of their seizures. Resective surgery is now standard practice for patients with medication-refractory epilepsy. Temporal lobectomy continues to be the most common surgery performed. Once patients fail 2 to 3 optimal trials of antiepileptic medication, further drug therapy offers a minimal number of patients freedom from seizures. In contrast, temporal lobectomy in carefully selected patients may result in seizure-free outcomes in more than 70% to 90% of patients with intractable seizures. As technology and drug availability increases in the new millennium, it is important for the primary care physician to be aware of epilepsy surgery as a means to treat patients with antiepileptic drug-refractory epilepsy. Arch Fam Med. 2000;9:1142-1147     

Regular health care use by lesbians: a path analysis of predictive factors

BACKGROUND: Lesbians have more health risks than other women but access preventive medical care less frequently. OBJECTIVE: To test the influence of (i) provider inquiry about sexual orientation, (ii) perceived provider gay-positivity and (iii) patient disclosure of sexual orientation on regular health care use in a sample of Canadian lesbians. METHODS: A path analysis using community survey data from 489 lesbian respondents. RESULTS: 78.5% [95% confidence interval (CI): 74.7-82.0] of women reported regular health service use; 75.8% (95% CI: 72.2-79.8) of women had disclosed their sexual orientation to their provider; and 24.4% (95% CI: 20.6-28.2) of women had been asked about their sexual orientation by their provider. Of those women whose physicians had inquired about their sexual orientation, 100% (95% CI: 97.5-100.0) had disclosed. In the final path analysis, perceived provider gay-positivity and level of patient outness predicted disclosure, which, along with health status predicted regular health care use. All paths were significant at P < 0.05. CONCLUSIONS: Provider-related factors including perceived gay-positivity and inquiry about sexual orientation are strongly associated with disclosure of sexual orientation. Disclosure is associated with regular health care use. Minor changes to practice could improve access to health services for lesbians.     

Impact of chronic pain on health care seeking, self care, and medication. Results from a population-based Swedish study

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To explore individual and social factors that could predict health care utilisation and medication among people with chronic pain in an unselected population. DESIGN: A mailed survey with questions about pain and mental symptoms, disability, self care action, visits to health care providers, and medication. SETTING: General populations in two Swedish primary health care (PHC) districts. Medical care was given in a state health system. PARTICIPANTS: A random sample (from the population register) of 15% of the population aged 25-74 (n = 1806). MAIN RESULTS: Among people reporting chronic pain 45.7% (compared with 29.8 of non-chronic pain persons, p < 0.05) consulted a physician and 7.2% (compared with 1.2%, p < 0.05) a physiotherapist during three months. Primary health care was the most frequent care provider. High pain intensity, aging, depression, ethnicity, and socioeconomic level had the greatest impact on physician consultations. Alternative care, used by 5.9%, was associated with high pain intensity and self care. Use of self care was influenced by high pain intensity, regular physical activity, and ethnicity. Alternative care and self care did not imply lower use of conventional health care. Women reporting chronic pain consumed more analgesics and sedatives than corresponding men. Besides female gender, high pain intensity, insomnia, physician consultation, social network, and self care action helped to explain medication with analgesics. Use of herbal remedies and ointments correlated to self care action, visit to an alternative therapist, high pain intensity, and socioeconomic level. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of chronic pain has an impressive impact on primary health care and medication. Various therapeutic actions are common and are partly overlapping. The use of health care among people with chronic pain depends above all on pain perception and intensity of pain but is also affected by ethnicity, age, socioeconomic level, and depressive symptoms. Among people with chronic pain use of analgesics is common in contrast with other types of pain relief (acupuncture, physiotherapy) suitable for treating chronic pain symptoms.     

Patient beliefs predict response to paroxetine among primary care patients with dysthymia and minor depression

BACKGROUND: Dysthymia and minor depression are common problems in primary care, but it is not known how patient health beliefs shape response to antidepressant treatment of these less severe forms of depression. METHODS: Three hundred thirty-three primary care patients with dysthymia or minor depression received at least 4 weeks of paroxetine or placebo in a multicenter, randomized controlled 11-week trial. Patient health beliefs and other characteristics were examined as predictors of treatment adherence and depression remission. RESULTS: Patient beliefs were not predictive of adherence to paroxetine or placebo. Patients with less endorsement of biological beliefs about their condition (odds ratio [OR] = 3.40), higher perceived general health (OR = 3.38), meeting criteria for dysthymia (OR = 2.37), and age younger than 60 years (OR = 2.68) were more likely to achieve remission on paroxetine. Patient beliefs did not predict remission on placebo. Those with lower severity of depression symptoms at baseline (OR = 2.70) and women (OR = 2.18) were most likely to achieve remission on placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that patients with dysthymia or minor depression are more likely to respond to antidepressant medication if they do not see their depression as a biological illness and see themselves as generally healthy. It is clearly not necessary for patients to believe that their dysthymia or minor depression is biological to respond to antidepressant medication.     

An exploration of the role of pharmacists within general practice clinics: the protocol for the pharmacists in practice study (PIPS)

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Medication-related problems are a serious concern in Australian primary care. Pharmacist interventions have been shown to be effective in identifying and resolving these problems. Collaborative general practitioner-pharmacist services currently available in Australia are limited and underused. Limitations include geographical isolation of pharmacists and lack of communication and access to patient information. Co-location of pharmacists within the general practice clinics is a possible solution. There have been no studies in the Australian setting exploring the role of pharmacists within general practice clinics.The aim of this study is to develop and test a multifaceted practice pharmacist role in primary care practices to improve the quality use of medicines by patients and clinic staff. METHODS: This is a multi-centre, prospective intervention study with a pre-post design and a qualitative component. A practice pharmacist will be located in each of two clinics and provide short and long patient consultations, drug information services and quality assurance activities. Patients receiving long consultation with a pharmacist will be followed up at 3 and 6 months. Based on sample size calculations, at least 50 patients will be recruited for long patient consultations across both sites. Outcome measures include the number, type and severity of medication-related problems identified and resolved; medication adherence; and patient satisfaction. Brief structured interviews will be conducted with patients participating in the study to evaluate their experiences with the service. Staff collaboration and satisfaction with the service will be assessed. DISCUSSION: This intervention has the potential to optimise medication use in primary care clinics leading to better health outcomes. This study will provide data about the effectiveness of the proposed model for pharmacist involvement in Australian general practice clinics, that will be useful to guide further research and development in this area.Trial registrationAustralian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12612000742875.     

General practitioners' knowledge of functional and social factors in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

The care of people with chronic physical disease is an important part of the work of general practitioners (GPs). Knowledge of social and functional factors, and good teamwork with other health and social care professionals, are necessary to provide high quality general practice care. This study investigated functional disability, social situation and the involvement of health and social care professionals in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, and their GPs' knowledge of these factors. Questionnaires were sent to all patients aged 15-74 with rheumatoid arthritis in two general practices, and similar questionnaires were given to their GPs. Functional disability was assessed using the health assessment questionnaire (HAQ), on a scale of 0-3. The GP consultation rate for patients with rheumatoid arthritis in the previous year was 6.9 compared to 3.7 for all patients in the practices, and increased with increasing disability. Sixty-five per cent of patients had a moderate (HAQ > 1 but 2) disabiltiy. There was an average difference between patient and GP scores for functional disability on the HAQ of 0.49 (95% confidence interval 0.36-0.62), with GPs scoring lower than patients and the difference increased with increasing disability. Seventy-one per cent of patients had seen a rheumatologist or orthopaedic surgeon in the previous year, but there was little involvement by other members of the primary health care team (PHCT). General practitioners had good levels of knowledge of their patients' employment status and who they lived with, but poor knowledge of most of the welfare benefits they were receiving, and of other health and social care professionals involved. It is concluded that GPs see their patients with rheumatoid arthritis frequently, but are often lacking the knowledge about their patients to provide high quality care. They often only know about aspects of their patients' care in which they are directly involved. Ways are suggested for how this situation could be improved.     

Can depression treatment in primary care reduce disability? A stepped care approach

OBJECTIVE: To assess effects of stepped collaborative care depression intervention on disability. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Four primary care clinics of a large health maintenance organization. PATIENTS: Two hundred twenty-eight patients with either 4 or more persistent major depressive symptoms or a score of 1.5 or greater on the Hopkins Symptom Checklist. Depression items were randomized to stepped care intervention or usual care 6 to 8 weeks after initiating antidepressant medication. INTERVENTION: Augmented treatment of persistently depressed patients by an on-site psychiatrist collaborating with primary care physicians. Treatment included patient education, adjustment of pharmacotherapy, and proactive monitoring of outcomes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Baseline, 1-, 3-, and 6-month assessments of the Sheehan Disability Scale and the social function and role limitation subscales of the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). RESULTS: Patients who received the depression intervention experienced less interference in their family, work, and social activities than patients receiving usual primary care (Sheehan Disability Scale, z = 2.23; P =.025). Patients receiving intervention also reported a trend toward more improvement in SF-36-defined social functioning than patients receiving usual care (z = 1.63, P =.10), but there was no significant difference in role performance (z = 0.07, P =.94). CONCLUSIONS: Significant disability accompanied depression in this persistently depressed group. The stepped care intervention resulted in small to moderate functional improvements for these primary care patients. Arch Fam Med. 2000;9:1052-1058     

Medication adherence among recipients with chronic diseases enrolled in a state medicaid program

Abstract Limited information is currently available about medication adherence for common chronic conditions among the Medicaid population. The primary objective of this study was to assess medication adherence among Medicaid recipients with depression, diabetes, epilepsy, hypercholesterolemia, and hypertension. Factors influencing adherence were determined. The authors also assessed whether adherence influences the utilization of acute care services. The target population included nonelderly adult recipients (ages 21-64 years) who were continuously enrolled in the Mississippi (MS) Medicaid fee-for-service program from January 1, 2006 to December 31, 2007. Recipients were identified who had a medical services claim with a diagnosis of depression, diabetes, epilepsy, hypercholesterolemia, or hypertension in calendar year 2006. Within each chronic disease sample, medication adherence was determined using calendar year 2007 data for recipients who met inclusion and exclusion criteria. Recipients with adherence ≥80% were classified as adherent. Logistic regression analyses were used to determine the factors that predict medication adherence and the effect of adherence on concurrent all-cause acute care service (ie, hospitalization, emergency room visit) utilization. Approximately 24% of recipients with depression, 35.9% with diabetes, 53.6% with epilepsy, 32% with hypercholesterolemia, and 42.2% with hypertension were adherent. Within each chronic disease sample, males and whites had higher adherence than females and blacks. After controlling for demographic and disease-related covariates, recipients who were adherent had lower concurrent acute care service utilization than nonadherent recipients. Given the inverse relationship between adherence and acute care service utilization, policy makers should consider implementing educational interventions aimed at improving adherence in this underprivileged population. (Population Health Management 2012;15:253-260).     

The worried young adult as a primary care patient

BACKGROUND: Being worried about one's complaint is common among primary health care patients. Persistent and intensive worry may, however, have negative consequences. OBJECTIVES: We explored complaint-related worry and factors associated with it among 18- to 39-year-old primary health care patients. METHODS: Sixty-two patients evaluated the intensity of their worry and the severity of their complaint before seeing their GP. They were also interviewed about their background and filled in questionnaires about general tendency to illness-related worry and psychiatric symptoms. RESULTS: The intensity of worry varied greatly. One fourth of the patients reported intense worry. A general tendency to worry about health and hostile reactions were associated with both the intensity of worry and the severity appraisals. The patient's education and the duration and perceived course of the complaint also played a role in worrying and in the perceptions of the severity of the complaint. CONCLUSIONS: Some psychological characteristics may dispose patients to intensive worrying and pessimistic appraisals of their complaint. This challenges the GP to pay attention to the patients' perspectives and knowledge. Careful elucidation of the patients' experiences of their complaints is especially indicated in the case of complaints of long duration and a stable course.     

Primary health care system in transition: the patient's experience.

OBJECTIVE: To find out how Estonian people evaluate the changes in primary health care (PHC), how they perceive the acceptability of the new PHC system, and to assess patients' satisfaction with their primary care doctor. DESIGN: Face-to-face interviews using structured questionnaires. SETTING: Estonia. STUDY PARTICIPANTS: A random sample of Estonian residents aged 15-74 years (n = 997). MAIN MEASURES: Acceptability of PHC system (accessibility, the patient-practitioner relations, amenities, and patient's preferences) and patients' satisfaction with primary care doctor. RESULTS: Of the 997 respondents, 46% were sufficiently informed about the transition to the general practitioner (GP)-based PHC system; however, 45% of respondents had not personally experienced any changes. Of the 997 persons interviewed, 68% were registered on the patient list of a GCP, and 62% of those who had health problems preferred to consult the primary care doctor first. The waiting time for an outpatient appointment was brief (0-2 days). Of the 997 respondents, 68% were satisfied with their primary care doctor. Satisfaction was dependent on: (i) how patients evaluated the competence of the physician; (ii) comprehensibility of doctor's explanations; and (iii) comfort of the clinic. The right of patients to choose their own primary care doctor and having sufficient information about the changes in PHC system had a positive influence on the level of satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: Patients' opinions are important in the evaluation of PHC. To increase the level of satisfaction, people need to understand the nature and intent of the primary care reforms. Personal choice of primary care doctor and good patient-doctor relationships are important factors too.