Gastric Leak After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: Early Covered Self-Expandable Stent Reduces Healing Time

Background

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy has become a very frequent procedure in bariatric surgery due to its efficacy and simplicity compared to gastric bypass. Gastric staple line leak (1 to 7 % of cases) is a severe complication with a long nonstandardized treatment. The aim of this retrospective study was to examine the success and tolerance of covered stents in its management.

Methods

From January 2009 to December 2011, nine patients with gastric staple line leaks after sleeve gastrectomy were treated with covered stents in our department (seven referred from other institutions). The leaks were diagnosed by CT scan and visualized during the endoscopy. Among the studied variables were operative technique, post-operative fistula diagnosis delay, stent treatment delay, and stent tolerance. In our institution, Hanarostent® (length 17 cm, diameter 18 mm; M.I. Tech, Seoul, Korea) was used and inserted under direct endoscopic control.

Results

Stent treatment was successful in seven cases (78 %). Two other cases had total gastrectomy (405 and 185 days after leak diagnosis). Early stent removal (due to migration or poor tolerance) was necessary in three cases. The average stent treatment duration was of 6.4 weeks, and the average healing time was 141 days. The five patients with an early stent treatment (≤3 weeks after leak diagnosis) had an average healing time of 99 days versus 224 for the four others.

Conclusions

Covered self-expandable stent is an effective treatment of gastric leaks after sleeve gastrectomy. Early stent treatment seems to be associated with shorter healing time.     

Endoscopic stent placement for treatment of sleeve gastrectomy leak: a single institution experience with fully covered stents

Background

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SG) has risen in prevalence as a standalone surgical option for treating obesity over the last 15 years. One of the most worrisome complications is development of a leak at the gastrectomy staple line.

Use of endoscopic stents to treat anastomotic complications after bariatric surgery

BACKGROUND: Complications after bariatric surgery often require longterm parenteral nutrition to achieve healing. Recently, endoscopic treatments have become available that provide healing while allowing for oral nutrition. The purpose of this study was to present outcomes of the largest series to date treating staple line complications after bariatric surgery with endoscopic covered stents. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective evaluation was performed of all patients treated for staple line complications after bariatric surgery at a single tertiary care bariatric center. Acute postoperative leaks, chronic gastrocutaneous fistulas, and anastomotic strictures refractory to endoscopic dilation after both gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy were included. RESULTS: From January 2006 to June 2007, 19 patients (11 with acute leaks, 2 with chronic fistulas, and 6 with strictures) were treated with a total of 34 endoscopic silicone covered stents (23 polyester, 11 metal). Mean followup was 3.6 months. Immediate symptomatic improvement occurred in 90% (91% of acute leaks, 100% of fistulas, and 84% of strictures). Oral feeding was started in 79% of patients immediately after stenting. Resolution of leak or stricture after stent treatment occurred in 16 of 19 patients (84%). Healing of leak, fistula, and stricture occurred at means of 33 days, 46 days, and 7 days, respectively. Three patients (1 with leak, 1 with fistula, and 1 with stricture) had unsuccessful stent treatment. Migration of the stent occurred in 58% of 34 stents placed. Most migration was minimal, but three stents were removed surgically after distal small bowel migration. There was no mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of anastomotic complications after bariatric surgery with endoscopic covered stents allows rapid healing while simultaneously allowing for oral nutrition. The primary morbidity is stent migration.     

Endoscopic treatment of mediastinal anastomotic leaks

BACKGROUND: Surgery, as well as conservative treatment, in patients with clinically apparent intrathoracic anastomotic leaks are often associated with poor results and carry a high morbidity and mortality. This report describes our results with the endoscopic treatment of intrathoracic anastomotic leakages. PATIENTS: 27 consecutive patients presenting with clinically apparent intrathoracic anastomotic leak, caused by resection of an epiphrenic diverticulum (n=1), esophagectomy for esophageal cancer (n=19), limited resection for carcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction (n=1) or gastrectomy for gastric cancer (n=6) were endoscopically treated. The extent of the dehiscences ranged from about 10-70%. After endoscopic lavage and debridement of the leakage (mean duration: 16,8 days) the leaks were closed with fibrin clue (n=9) or endoclips (n=2) in cases of smaller leaks or by stent placement (n=11), stent placement after unsuccessful fibrin clue injections (n=3) or stent placement and endoclipping (n=1) in patients with a large leakage. Simultaneously the periesophageal mediastinum was drained by chest drains. RESULTS: 25 of 27 patients were successfully treated endoscopically. Under endoscopic treatment one patient died due to septic multiorgan failure. Another patient developed a refractory, persistent leak. Procedure related complications (stent migration, anastomotic stenosis) were obtained in 6 patients. CONCLUSION: An endoscopic approach is successful and safe to treat symptomatic intrathoracic anastomotic leaks smaller than 70% of the circumference. An endoscopic lavage and debridement of the leak, prior to leak closure, seems to be helpful to reduce mediastinal and pleural inflammation. In patients with smaller leaks (<30%) fibrin clue injections and endoclipping is recommended. Patients with a dehiscence from 30-70% of the circumference profit from stent placement.     

Endoscopic Stenting of Gastric Staple Line Leak Following Sleeve Gastrectomy

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy is known to be associated with a risk of gastric staple line leak. We report on our experience with endoscopic stenting of the anomalous leaking tract. Three cases of post sleeve gastric leak confirmed by computed tomography scan were treated by endoscopic stenting of their leak with a plastic endoprosthesis under fluoroscopic and endoscopic guidance. Endoscopic stenting by means of biliary or pancreatic endoprosthesis was successful in the three patients. The median number of endoscopy procedures per patient was 1.3. Stents were extracted 6 to 10 weeks after their placement. Neither morbidity nor recurrence was noticed on follow-up. Endoscopic stenting of gastric staple line leak following sleeve gastrectomy proved to be an efficacious technique for leak healing.     

Treating sleeve gastrectomy leak with endoscopic stenting: the kuwaiti experience and review of recent literature

Background

Obesity today is a leading cause of global morbidity and mortality, and bariatric surgeries such as laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) are increasingly playing a key role in its management. Such operations, however, carry many difficult and sometimes fatal complications, including leaks. This study aims at evaluating the effectiveness of endoscopic stenting in treating gastric leaks post-LSG.

Methods

A retrospective study was conducted to the patients who were admitted with post-LSG gastric leak at Al-Amiri Hospital Kuwait from October 2008 to December 2012 and were subsequently treated with stenting. The patients were stented endoscopically with self-expandable metal stent (SEMS), and a self-expandable plastic stent (SEPS) was used to facilitate stent removal.

Results

A total of 17 patients with post-LSG leaks underwent endoscopic stenting. The median age was 34 years (range 19–56), 53 % of the patients were male, and mean body mass index (BMI) was 43 kg/m ² . The median duration of SEMS placement per patient was 42 days (range 28–84). The SEPS-assisted retrieval process took a median duration of 11 days (range 14–35). Successful treatment of gastric leak was evident in 13 (76 %) patients, as evident by gastrografin swallow 1 week after stent removal. In addition, a shorter duration between the LSG and the time of stent placement was associated with a higher success rate of leak seal.

Conclusions

The use of SEMS appears to be a safe and effective method in the treatment of post-LSG leaks, with a success rate of 76 %. The time frame of intervention after surgery is critical, as earlier stent placement is associated with favorable outcomes. Finally, SEPS is often required to facilitate SEMS removal, and further modification of stents and its delivery system may improve results.     

Natural orifice management of anastomotic leaks after minimally invasive esophagogastrectomy

A leak after an esophagectomy can lead to significant morbidity and mortality. The treatment options for postoperative leaks include reoperation with pleural drainage and placement of T-tube drainage catheter to control the gastrointestinal leak or complete gastrointestinal diversion, depending on the extent of the leak and tissue viability of the gastric conduit. Both these options require an invasive reoperation. In selected cases, endoscopic deployment of a covered esophageal stent may be an effective minimally invasive option in the management of an esophageal leak. This report describes the indications and techniques for management of an esophageal leak using the natural orifice for drainage of a mediastinal abscess and deployment of an esophageal stent.     

Nonsurgical Treatment of Staple Line Leaks after Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy

Background  Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is gaining popularity as a “per se” bariatric procedure due to its effectiveness on weight loss and comorbidity resolution. The most feared and life-threatening complication after LSG is the staple line leak and its management is still a debated issue. Aim of this paper is to analyze the incidence of leak and the treatment solutions adopted in a consecutive series of 200 LSG. Methods  From October 2002 to November 2008, 200 patients underwent LSG. Nineteen patients (9.5%) had a body mass index (BMI) of >60 kg/m². A 48-Fr bougie is used to obtain an 80–120-ml gastric pouch. An oversewing running suture to reinforce the staple line was performed in the last 100 cases. The technique adopted to reinforce the staple line is a running suture taken through and through the complete stomach wall. Results  Staple line leaks occurred in six patients (mean BMI 52.5; mean age 41.6 years). Leak presentation was early in three cases (first, second, and third postoperative (PO) day), late in the remaining three cases (11th, 22nd, and 30th PO day). The most common leak location was at the esophagogastric junction (five cases). Mortality was nihil. Nonoperative management (total parenteral nutrition, proton pump inhibitor, and antibiotics) was adopted in all cases. Percutaneous abdominal drainage was placed in five patients. In one case, a small fistula was successfully treated by endoscopic injection of fibrin glue only. Self-expandable covered stent was used in three cases. Complete healing of leaks was obtained in all patients (mean healing time 71 days). Conclusion  Nonoperative treatment (percutaneous drainage, endoscopy, stent) is feasible, safe, and effective for staple line leaks in patients undergoing LSG; furthermore, it may avoid more mutilating procedures such as total gastrectomy.     

Outcomes of a novel bariatric stent in the management of sleeve gastrectomy leaks: a multicenter study

BackgroundThe management of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy leaks remains a challenge. This can be treated with placement of self-expandable metal stents, which are most effective in the acute and early settings. However, migration is a frequent adverse event (AE). Novel, fully covered stents with a larger proximal flare to limit migration designed specifically to treat postsleeve leaks were recently introduced.ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a novel stent specifically designed for postsleeve leaks treatment.SettingMulticenter retrospective study.MethodsThis is a multicenter study, including patients with acute and early post laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy leaks, treated with a large bariatric stent. The outcomes include technical success, clinical success, and safety profile. A multivariable regression was performed to assess predictors of success.ResultsThirty-seven patients were included (10 acute and 27 early leaks), with 30 stents in the postpyloric (POST) and 7 in the prepyloric position. Technical success was 100%. Mean stent dwell time was 29.08 days. Clinical success was achieved in 78.37%. Leak duration, leak size, and stent dwell time did not correlate with clinical success. During follow-up, 8 patients had stent migration (21.62%) and all were in a POST position. AE poststent removal were also evaluated (prepyloric: 57.14% vs POST: 33.3%, P = .45). There was no difference between prepyloric and POST position in the severe AE analysis.ConclusionsThis novel, large-caliber, fully covered stent specifically designed for sleeve leaks appears to be effective at treating acute and early leaks. However, the large flanges and long stent length do not appear to reduce migration rate and may be associated with higher overall severe AE rates. Avoiding placement in the POST position may help mitigate migration risk; however, owing to the risk profile this stent should be used with caution.     

Treatment of Gastric Leaks with Coated Self-Expanding Stents after Sleeve Gastrectomy

Background Duodenal switch (DS) is one of the most effective techniques for the treatment of morbid obesity and its co-morbidities, with mortality rate <1%, but with 9.4% morbidity rates (6.5% due to leaks). In our experience, leaks of the staple-line after sleeve gastrectomy (SG) are the most frequent sites of fistula formation and conservative treatment usually takes a long time.We present our experience in the treatment of gastric leaks with coated self-expandable stents (CSES). Methods 6 patients had gastric leaks at the gastroesophageal (GE) junction after SG or DS. One patient had a symptomatic gastro-bronchial fistula. Stents were placed by the interventional radiologist under fluoroscopic control and removed endoscopically. In one case, we used an uncoated Wallstent. In two patients, percutaneous microcoil embolization of the fistula was added. Results The patient treated with the Wallstent required a total gastrectomy 6 months after placement of the uncovered stent. In the other 5 patients, coated stents were successfully removed and the gastric leaks completely sealed. Conclusions CSES are proposed as an alternative therapeutic option for the management of GE junction leaks in bariatric surgery with good results in terms of morbidity and survival.     

Fatal aortoesophageal fistula bleeding after stenting for a leak post sleeve gastrectomy

Bariatric surgeries have been used in an effort to curtail the obesity epidemic. The type of surgery used has changed over time, with sleeve gastrectomies being one of the preferred options. This has been associated with some complications, including staple line leaks. We report a 43-year old female who had undergone a laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy that was complicated by a proximal gastric pouch leak at the gastroesophageal junction. We used self-expandable stents (SEMS) in the management of the leak. Seven weeks after the insertion of the initial SEMS, the patient presented with a massive gastrointestinal bleed that could not be localized due to profuse bleeding. The patient underwent a computerized tomography angiogram and then an angiogram that could not localize the site of the bleed. An emergency laparotomy was performed and identified the source of bleeding to be an aortoesophageal fistula. A graft of the diseased area was attempted but the patient unfortunately did not survive the procedure. An aortoesophageal fistula after an esophageal SEMS insertion for a benign disease has rarely been reported and only in cases where there was a thoracic neoplasm, thoracic aortic aneurism, endovascular stent repair, foreign body or esophageal surgery. To our knowledge, this is the first case that reports an aortoesophageal fistula as a result of a SEMS for the management of a gastric pouch leak after a laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.     

‘Stent in a Stent’—An Alternative Technique for Removing Partially Covered Stents Following Sleeve Gastrectomy Complications

Endoscopic stenting is a relatively new technique for the treatment of post sleeve gastrectomy complications. Partially covered stents are used in this method to minimise the risk of migration but they are associated with difficulties with removal. Patients requiring emergency stenting following sleeve gastrectomy underwent insertion of a partially covered metallic stent. One month later, if the stent was not easily removable, a fully covered overlapping stent was inserted and the patient was readmitted 2 weeks later for removal of both stents. Four patients required stenting following sleeve gastrectomy leaks, and one patient required stenting for a stricture. In these cases, a ‘stent in a stent’ technique was used for removal. This technique allows the safe removal of partially covered stents inserted following sleeve gastrectomy complications.     

A novel dedicated endoscopic stent for staple-line leaks after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a case series

BackgroundStaple-line leak is the most serious complication of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) occurring in .5−7% of cases. Patients with this complication are often managed with an esophageal covered, self-expandable metal stent positioned at endoscopy. Unfortunately, migration of these stents has been reported in 30–50% of cases. A novel fully-covered, self-expanding metal stent (Megastent), specifically designed for post-LSG leaks is now available. The objective of this study was to describe the first case series of patients with a staple-line leak after LSG who were endoscopically managed with such a novel stent.MethodsFour patients who developed a staple-line leak after LSG were treated by positioning a Megastent at endoscopy. The stents were removed after 8 weeks.ResultsA complete leak repair was achieved in all patients. No stent migration occurred. Prokinetic therapy was needed to treat vomiting episodes during stent presence. At endoscopic evaluation after stent removal, a decubitus lesion at the distal part of the duodenal bulb was observed.ConclusionThese preliminary results would suggest the use of the Megastent as an option for stenting of a staple-line leak after LSG. Further studies are still necessary.     

Stent implantation as a treatment option in patients with thoracic anastomotic leaks after esophagectomy

Background In patients with esophagectomy and gastric pull up for esophageal carcinoma anastomotic leaks are a well-known complication and a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Objective We evaluated stent implantation as a treatment option in patients with thoracic anastomotic leaks after esophagectomy. Methods 269 patients with esophageal cancer (adenocarcinoma n = 212, squamous cell carcinoma n = 57) had undergone esophagectomy and gastric pull up with an intrathoracic anastomosis between January 1998 and December 2005. A thoracic anastomotic leak was clinically and endoscopically proven in 12 patients (4.5%). Endoscopic insertion of a self-expanding covered metal stent at the site of the anastomotic leak was performed in 10 patients; two patients were treated with fibrin glue. Results Stents were successfully placed in all patients without complications. In all but one patient (n = 9) radiological examination showed complete closure of the leakage. In one patient the stent was endoscopically corrected and complete closure could be achieved thereafter. The stent could be removed after six weeks in five patients. Stent migration occurred in four patients. In all but one patient (n = 7) definitive leak occlusion was achieved. Two patients died during their hospital stayfor reasons not related to the stent placement. Conclusion Stent implantation in patients with thoracic anastomotic leaks after esophagectomy is an easily available and effective treatment option with low morbidity, but stent migration does occur.     

Sleeve gastrectomy and the risk of leak: a systematic analysis of 4,888 patients

Introduction

Sleeve gastrectomy has become a popular stand-alone bariatric procedure with comparable weight loss and resolution of comorbidities to that of laparoscopic gastric bypass. The simplicity of the procedure and the decreased long-term risk profile make this surgery more appealing. Nonetheless, the ever present risk of a staple-line leak is still of great concern and needs further investigation.

Methods

An electronic literature search of MEDLINE database plus manual reference checks of articles published on laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for morbid obesity and its complications was completed. Keywords used in the search were “sleeve gastrectomy” OR “gastric sleeve” AND “leak.” We analyzed 29 publications, including 4,888 patients. We analyzed the frequency of leak after sleeve gastrectomy and its associated risks of causation.

Results

The risk of leak after sleeve gastrectomy in all comers was 2.4%. This risk was 2.9% in the super-obese [body mass index (BMI)?>?50?kg/m²] and 2.2% for BMI?2. Staple height and use of buttressing material did not affect leak rate. The use of a size 40-Fr or greater bougie was associated with a leak rate of 0.6% compared with those who used smaller sizes whose leak rate was 2.8%. Leaks were found at the proximal third of the stomach in 89% of cases. Most leaks were diagnosed after discharge. Endoscopic management is a viable option for leaks and was documented in 11% of cases as successful.

Conclusions

Sleeve gastrectomy has become an important surgical option for the treatment of the ever growing morbidly obese population. The risk of leak is low at 2.4%. Attention to detail specifically at the esophagogastric junction cannot be stressed enough. Careful patient selection (BMI?2) and adopting the use of a 40-Fr or larger bougie may decrease the risk of leak. Vigilant follow-up during the first 30?days is critical to avoid catastrophe, because most leaks will happen after patient discharge.     

Use of self-expandable metal stents for the treatment of esophageal perforations and anastomotic leaks

Background  Esophageal perforations and extensive anastomotic leaks after esophageal resection or gastrectomy are surgical emergencies with high mortality rates. In recent years, the use of self-expanding metallic stents (SEMS) has emerged as a promising treatment alternative for bridging and sealing the damage. This study aimed to evaluate the role of covered SEMS for the management of esophageal perforations and anastomotic leaks. Methods  All esophageal stent placement procedures (174 procedures for 157 patients) at the authors’ unit between January 1999 and April 2008 were assessed by a retrospective chart review. Of the 157 patients, 10 (6.4%) were treated with SEMS for sealing of an iatrogenic esophageal perforation (n = 4), a spontaneous esophageal rupture in Boerhaave’s syndrome (n = 4), or an anastomotic leakage (n = 2). Results  The median time from perforation or anastomotic leak to stent insertion was 13 days (range, 2 h to 48 days). The esophageal leak was totally sealed for 8 (80%) of 10 patients. The overall mortality rate was 50% (n = 5), and three (30%) of the five deaths were related to the perforation (n = 2) or leakage (n = 1). In both of the perforation cases, the diagnosis and treatment were substantially delayed. One patient with an anastomotic leak after gastrectomy died of the complication despite successful operative and SEMS treatment. Two of the deaths were unrelated to the perforation. In both cases, the cause of death was a disseminated malignant disease. Conclusions  Traumatic perforations and anastomotic leaks can be treated effectively with covered SEMS together with adequate drainage of the thoracic cavity even in cases of severely ill patients with inveterate esophageal perforations and leaks.     

Surgical management of chronic fistula after sleeve gastrectomy

BackgroundThere is no clear definition of the chronic leak after sleeve gastrectomy. There are several endoscopic approaches, including endoprothese, endoscopic clips, endoscopic sealing glue, or balloon dilation. In case of failure of the endoscopic treatment, a definitive surgical approach can be attempted. The objective was to evaluate the surgical treatment of chronic leak after sleeve gastrectomy.MethodsFrom November 2010 through March 2012, 8 patients with chronic gastric fistula after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy had definitive surgical repair. The initial intervention, the diagnosis and management of the fistula, and the endoscopic approach were carefully reviewed.ResultsFive patients had their original laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomies performed at another hospital, while 3 had laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy at our institution. The mean period of time from the diagnosis of the fistula to definitive surgical treatment was 14.4 months (range 5–44 months). Seven patients initially had surgical drainage by laparoscopy (5) and by laparotomy (2), with concomitant feeding jejunostomy in 6 patients. The endoscopic treatment consisted of endoprothese in 4 patients, endoscopic sealing glue in 2 patients, and sequential approach with glue and prosthesis in 2 other patients. One patient was treated exclusively by endoscopic approach with no surgical drainage.The surgical procedures performed for chronic fistula were gastrojejunal lateral anastomosis (4), Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (2), and gastrectomy with esojejunal anastomosis (2). Four patients presented with postoperative fistula, with a mean healing time of 32 days (range 22–63 days). No mortality was recorded.ConclusionIn chronic forms of fistulas with no improvements by endoscopic approach, the surgical treatment can be a solution. It remains a difficult procedure with a high percentage of leakage, but this type of fistula is more easily tolerated by the patient and heals faster.     

Endoscopic closure of persistent gastric leak and fistula following laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy

IntroductionConservative management for gastric leak and fistulae after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) often results in prolonged hospitalization as well as requirement of TPN or recurrent surgery (Casella et al., 2009) [1]. Endoscopically-placed stents are an additional non-invasive method, but are associated with the complication of stent migration in up to 50% of cases (Casella and co-workers, 2009) [1,4]. As other non-invasive means of treatment are absent, we believe this case demonstrates a new technique for multiple gastric leaks following LSG in patients without sepsis or peritonitis.Presentation of caseA patient developed a staple line gastric leak that persisted for 10 weeks following LSG despite multiple modalities of treatment. She refused to undergo stent placement, so via esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD), fistula margins were cauterized with argon plasma coagulation and a fibrin sealant was injected to include the surrounding area. Endoclips were placed along the fistula tracts. A repeat procedure was required. Follow up imaging confirmed resolution of gastric leak and patient did not experience additional complications.DiscussionThe patient was able to discontinue TPN and return to an oral diet. Both procedures were well tolerated and did not require hospitalization.ConclusionEndoscopic management of multiple gastric leaks and fistulae using fibrin seal, endoclips, and cauterization appears to be a promising noninvasive form of treatment with a lower associated morbidity and shortened hospitalization.     

Repair of an aberrant subclavian arterioesophageal fistula following esophageal stent placement

A fistula formation between the esophagus and an aberrant right subclavian artery is a rare but fatal com-plication that has been mostly described in the setting of prolonged nasogastric intubation and foreign body erosion. We report a case of a young morbidly obese patient who underwent sleeve gastrectomy that was complicated by a postoperative leak at the level of the gastroesophageal junction. A covered esophageal stent was placed endoscopically to treat the leak. The pa-tient developed massive upper gastrointestinal bleeding secondary to the erosion of the stent into an aberrant retroesophageal right subclavian artery twelve days after stent placement. She was ultimately treated by endovascular stenting of the aberrant right subclavian artery followed by thoracotomy and esophageal repair over a T-tube. This case report highlights the multidis-ciplinary approach needed to diagnose and managesuch a devastating complication. It also emphasizes the need for imaging studies prior to stent deployment to delineate the vascular anatomy and rule out the possi-bility of such an anomaly in view of the growing popu-larity of esophageal stents, especially in the setting of a leak.     

Reinforcement Does Not Necessarily Reduce the Rate of Staple Line Leaks After Sleeve Gastrectomy. A Review of the Literature and Clinical Experiences

Background  Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is an accepted bariatric procedure, with an advantaged by a low complication rate. A feared complication is stapler line leak. Buttressing materials have been suggested as a means of reducing staple line leak rates. We analyzed the leak rates from published series to help in demonstrating a potential cause. Methods  The study was institutional review board (IRB) approved retrospectively. A Medline search using the key words sleeve gastrectomy and bariatric surgery obtained 54 articles. Attention was restricted to 11 articles written in English that listed numbers of gastrectomy procedures and leaks. Poisson regression assessed the possibility that patients who received buttressing materials had a reduced rate of leaks. Results  Thirty-five patients were evaluated from Greece (15) and the United States (20); two patients developed staple line leaks that appeared to be related to problems associated with buttressing materials. Eleven prior studies and the present series yielded 1,589 procedures, 15 (0.94%) of which were complicated by leaks. The leak rate for patients who were known to have received reinforcement of some sort was 1.45 (95% confidence interval 0.41–3.43) times that for other patients. To detect a difference between 1% and 0.5% as statistically significant in 80% of cases, with a two tailed test and alpha set at 0.05, would require 9,346 procedures. Conclusions  There is no reason to believe, at this point, that reduction in leak rates occur because reinforcement is used. Because the leak rate is small, the routine reinforcement of the staple line after sleeve gastrectomy is questionable at best, although a decrease in hemorrhage has been reported.