Evaluation of a non-linear spectral subtraction noise suppression scheme in cochlear implant users

The aim of the study was to determine benefit to speech recognition in noise by adult cochlear implant users with the non-linear spectral subtraction (NSS) noise suppression strategy. Users of the Nucleus 22 or Nucleus 24 cochlear implant systems were tested with sentence materials combined with stationary noise at +5 and +10 dB signal to noise ratio (SNR), with and without NSS processing applied offline. Sentence scores were significantly higher with NSS processing, for both SNRs. The effect was greater at +5 dB SNR (12% improvement with NSS) than at +10 dB SNR (5% improvement with NSS). These results are promising and suggest that online implementation of NSS as part of cochlear implant processors has the potential to yield benefits for speech recognition in noise.     

Performance of subjects fit with the Advanced Bionics CII and Nucleus 3G cochlear implant devices

OBJECTIVE: To determine if subjects who used different cochlear implant devices and who were matched on consonant-vowel-consonant (CNC) identification in quiet would show differences in performance on speech-based tests of spectral and temporal resolution, speech understanding in noise, or speech understanding at low sound levels. DESIGN: The performance of 15 subjects fit with the CII Bionic Ear System (CII Bionic Ear behind-the-ear speech processor with the Hi-Resolution sound processing strategy; Advanced Bionics Corporation) was compared with the performance of 15 subjects fit with the Nucleus 24 electrode array and ESPrit 3G behind-the-ear speech processor with the advanced combination encoder speech coding strategy (cochlear corporation). SUBJECTS: Thirty adults with late-onset deafness and above-average speech perception abilities who used cochlear implants. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Vowel recognition, consonant recognition, sentences in quiet (74, 64, and 54 dB SPL [sound pressure level]) and in noise (+10 and +5 dB SNR [signal-to-noise ratio]), voice discrimination, and melody recognition. RESULTS: Group differences in performance were significant in 4 conditions: vowel identification, difficult sentence material at +5 dB and +10 dB SNR, and a measure that quantified performance in noise and low input levels relative to performance in quiet. CONCLUSIONS: We have identified tasks on which there are between-group differences in performance for subjects matched on CNC word scores in quiet. We suspect that the differences in performance are due to differences in signal processing. Our next goal is to uncover the signal processing attributes of the speech processors that are responsible for the differences in performance.     

Effects of noise and noise suppression on speech perception by cochlear implant users.

The recognition of phonemes in consonant-vowel-consonant words, presented in speech-shaped random noise, was measured as a function of signal to noise ratio (S/N) in 10 normally hearing adults and 10 successful adult users of the Nucleus cochlear implant. Optimal scores (measured at a S/N of +25 dB) were 98% for the average normal subject and 42% for the average implantee. Phoneme recognition threshold was defined as the S/N at which the phoneme recognition score fell to 50% of its optimal value. This threshold was -2 dB for the average normal subject and +9 dB for the average implantee. Application of a digital noise suppression algorithm (INTEL) to the mixed speech plus noise signal had no effect on the optimal phoneme recognition score of either group or on the phoneme recognition threshold of the normal group. It did, however, improve the phoneme recognition threshold of the implant group by an average of 4 to 5 dB. These findings illustrate the noise susceptibility of Nucleus cochlear implant users and suggest that single-channel digital noise reduction techniques may offer some relief from this problem.     

Effects of electrode deactivation on speech recognition in multichannel cochlear implant recipients

Objectives: The objective of the current study is to evaluate how speech recognition performance is affected by the number of active electrodes that are turned off in multichannel cochlear implants. Several recent studies have demonstrated positive effects of deactivating stimulation sites based on an objective measure in cochlear implant processing strategies. Previous studies using an analysis of variance have shown that, on average, cochlear implant listeners’ performance does not improve beyond eight active electrodes. We hypothesized that using a generalized linear mixed model would allow for better examination of this question.

Methods: Seven peri- and post-lingual adult cochlear implant users (eight ears) were tested on speech recognition tasks using experimental MAPs which contained either 8, 12, 16 or 20 active electrodes. Speech recognition tests included CUNY sentences in speech-shaped noise, TIMIT sentences in quiet as well as vowel (CVC) and consonant (CV) stimuli presented in quiet and in signal-to-noise ratios of 0 and +10?dB.

Results: The speech recognition threshold in noise (dB SNR) significantly worsened by approximately 2?dB on average as the number of active electrodes was decreased from 20 to 8. Likewise, sentence recognition scores in quiet significantly decreased by an average of approximately 12%.

Discussion/conclusion: Cochlear implant recipients can utilize and benefit from using more than eight spectral channels when listening to complex sentences or sentences in background noise. The results of the current study suggest a conservative approach for turning off stimulation sites is best when using site-selection procedures.     

Use of S-shaped input-output functions for noise suppression in cochlear implants

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to assess the influence of the shape of the acoustic-to-electric mapping function on speech recognition in noise by cochlear implant listeners. DESIGN: A new acoustic-to-electric mapping function is proposed for cochlear implant users in noisy environments. The proposed s-shaped mapping function was expansive for low input levels up to a knee point level and compressive thereafter. The knee point of the mapping functions changed dynamically and was set proportional to the estimated noise floor level. The performance of the mapping function was evaluated on a sentence recognition task using IEEE sentences embedded in +5 to 10 dB SNR multitalker babble and in +5 dB SNR speech-shaped noise. Nine postlingually deafened cochlear implant users participated in the study. RESULTS: Results indicated that the same s-shaped mapping function did not yield significant improvements for all cochlear implant users. Significant benefits in speech intelligibility were observed, however, when the s-shaped mapping function was optimized to individual cochlear implant users. Significantly higher performance was achieved with the s-shaped mapping functions than the conventional log mapping function used by cochlear implant users in their daily strategy, in both multitalker (+5 and +10 dB SNR) and continuous speech-shaped (+5 dB SNR) conditions. CONCLUSIONS: These results clearly indicate that the shape of the nonlinear acoustic-to-electric mapping can have a significant effect on speech intelligibility in noise when it is optimized to individual cochlear implant users. The log functions currently used in most implant processors for mapping acoustic to electric amplitudes are not the best mapping functions to use in noisy environments. This is largely because compressive functions tend to amplify low-level segments of speech along with noise, thereby decreasing the spectral contrast and effective dynamic range. In contrast, the s-shaped mapping functions, which are partly compressive and partly expansive depending on the signal level, are more suitable for noisy environments and can produce significantly higher performance than the log-mapping functions.     

Recognition of speech presented at soft to loud levels by adult cochlear implant recipients of three cochlear implant systems

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to conduct a large-scale investigation with adult recipients of the Clarion, Med-El, and Nucleus cochlear implant systems to (1) determine average scores and ranges of performance for word and sentence stimuli presented at three intensity levels (70, 60, and 50 dB SPL); (2) provide information on the variability of scores for each subject by obtaining test-retest measures for all test conditions; and (3) further evaluate the potential use of lower speech presentation levels (i.e., 60 and/or 50 dB SPL) in cochlear implant candidacy assessment. DESIGN: Seventy-eight adult cochlear implant recipients, 26 with each of the three cochlear implant systems, participated in the study. To ensure that the data collected reflect the range of performance of adult recipients using recent technology for the three implant systems (Clarion HiFocus I or II, Med-El Combi 40+, Nucleus 24M or 24R), a composite range and distribution of consonant-nucleus-consonant (CNC) monosyllabic word scores was determined. Subjects using each device were selected to closely represent this range and distribution of CNC performance. During test sessions, subjects were administered the Hearing in Noise Test (HINT) sentence test and the CNC word test at three presentation levels (70, 60, and 50 dB SPL). HINT sentences also were administered at 60 dB SPL with a signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of +8 dB. Warble tones were used to determine sound-field threshold levels from 250 to 4000 Hz. Test-retest measures were obtained for each of the speech recognition tests as well as for warble-tone sound-field thresholds. RESULTS: Cochlear implant recipients using the Clarion, Med-El, or Nucleus devices performed on average equally as well at 60 compared with 70 dB SPL when listening for words and sentences. Additionally, subjects had substantial open-set speech perception performance at the softer level of 50 dB SPL for the same stimuli; however, subjects' ability to understand speech was poorer when listening in noise to signals of greater intensity (60 dB SPL + 8 SNR) than when listening to signals presented at a soft presentation level (50 dB SPL) in quiet. A significant correlation was found between sound-field thresholds and speech recognition scores for presentation levels below 70 dB SPL. The results demonstrated a high test-retest reliability with cochlear implant users for these presentation levels and stimuli. Average sound-field thresholds were between 24 and 29 dB HL for frequencies of 250 to 4000 Hz, and results across sessions were essentially the same. CONCLUSIONS: Speech perception measures used with cochlear implant candidates and recipients should reflect the listening challenges that individuals encounter in natural communication situations. These data provide the basis for recommending new candidacy criteria based on speech recognition tests presented at 60 and/or 50 dB SPL, intensity levels that reflect real-life listening, rather than 70 dB SPL.     

Performance of compressed analogue (CA) and continuous interleaved sampling (CIS) coding strategies for cochlear implants in quiet and noise

Speech understanding with compressed analogue (CA) and continuous interleaved sampling (CIS) coding strategies for cochlear implants was compared in quiet and in noise at signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) of 15, 10 and 5 dB. The speech recognition of three experienced users of the Ineraid cochlear implant (CA coding strategy) was assessed using a set of sentence, vowel and consonant tests. Three weeks after the fitting of a CIS processor, the tests were repeated with the new device. Speech recognition scores for the sentence and consonant tests tended to be higher with the CIS processor in no or little noise, but lower in the test situations with less favourable SNRs, when compared to the CA processor (average score differences for the consonant test: +7.8% correct at 15 dB SNR; -6.8% correct at 5 dB SNR; p = 0.05). Results for the vowel test were slightly lower on average for the CIS processing strategy at all SNRs. A possible explanation for the differences in performance between CIS and CA in the consonant and sentence tests at different SNRs is the generally higher free-field threshold associated with the CA coding strategy, which may act as a single-channel noise suppression.     

A multicentre clinical evaluation of paediatric cochlear implant users upgrading to the Nucleus® 6 system

ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to investigate whether experienced paediatric cochlear implant users could show benefits to speech perception outcomes from the introduction of noise reduction and automated scene classification technologies as implemented in the Nucleus^® 6 sound processor. Previous research with adult cochlear implant users had shown significant improvements in speech intelligibility for listening in noisy conditions and good user acceptance for upgrading to the Nucleus 6 processor. In adults, these improvements for listening in noise were primarily attributed to the use of a range of new input processing technologies including noise reduction, as well as introduction of automatic scene classification technology.MethodsExperienced paediatric cochlear implant users (n = 25) were recruited from four clinics located in three countries. Research participants were evaluated on three occasions, an initial session using their Nucleus 5 sound processor; a second session in which participants used the Nucleus 6 processor programmed with the same technologies as were used in their Nucleus 5 sound processor; and a final session in which participants used the Nucleus 6 processor programmed with the default technologies including automatic scene classification (SCAN) which automatically selects the microphone directionality, noise reduction (SNR-NR), and wind noise reduction (WNR) technologies. Prior to both the second and third evaluations, research participants had approximately two weeks take-home experience with the new system. Speech perception performances on monosyllabic word tests presented in quiet and in noise, and a sentence test presented in noise, were compared across the three processor conditions. Acceptance of the Nucleus 6 default settings was assessed in a final session.ResultsNo group mean difference in performance was found for monosyllabic words in quiet. A significant improvement in speech perception was found for both monosyllabic words and sentences in noise with the default Nucleus 6 program condition as compared with the Nucleus 5 condition. No acceptance issues were noted for any of the children.ConclusionsExperienced paediatric cochlear implant users showed a significant improvement in speech perception in listening in noise when upgraded to the Nucleus 6 sound processor primarily due to the introduction of a noise reduction technology, and all children accepted the default program. These findings suggest that school-aged children may benefit from upgrading to the Nucleus 6 sound processor using the default program.     

Optimizing the number of electrodes with high-rate stimulation of the clarion CII cochlear implant

OBJECTIVE: This blind crossover study evaluates the effect of the number of electrodes of the Clarion CII cochlear implant on speech perception in silence and in noise using a "high-rate" continuous interleaved sampling (CIS) strategy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Nine users of this implant with 3-11 months of experience of an 8-channel CIS strategy [833 pulses per second (pps)/channel, 75 micros/phase] were fitted in a random order with 8-, 12- and 16-channel CIS strategies (+/- 1,400 pps/channel, 21 micros/phase). After 1 month of exclusive use of each strategy the performance was tested with consonant-vowel-consonant words in silence (sound only) and in speech-shaped background noise with signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) of + 10, + 5, 0 and -5 dB. RESULTS: With "high-rate" strategies most patients' speech understanding in noise improved, although the optimum number of electrodes was highly variable. Generally, faster performers benefited from more active electrodes, whilst slower performers deteriorated. If each patient's optimal strategy was determined by a weighted sum of the test results at +10, + 5 and 0 dB SNR, the average phoneme score improved from 57% to 72% at a SNR of + 5 dB, and from 46% to 56% at a SNR of 0 dB. The average phoneme score in silence was approximately 85% for all strategies. CONCLUSION: We conclude that speech perception (especially in noise) can improve significantly with "high-rate" speech processing strategies, provided that the optimum number of electrodes is determined for each patient individually.     

Speech recognition for unilateral and bilateral cochlear implant modes in the presence of uncorrelated noise sources

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the current investigation was to compare speech recognition in noise for bilateral and unilateral modes within postlingually deafened, adult bilateral cochlear implant recipients. In addition, it was of interest to evaluate the time course of the bilateral speech-recognition advantage and the effect of changing signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) on the magnitude of the bilateral advantage. DESIGN: In the first experiment, 16 postlingually deafened adults who were bilaterally implanted with the MED-EL C40+ cochlear device were evaluated in unilateral left, unilateral right, and bilateral conditions 4 to 7 mo after activation. Speech recognition in the presence of five spatially separated, uncorrelated noise sources was evaluated using both a single fixed SNR of +10 dB and an adaptive-SNR method. In a follow-up study, a subset of 10 participants was re-evaluated using an identical fixed-SNR method 12 to 17 mo after activation to examine the time course of speech-recognition performance in both unilateral and bilateral modes at a single SNR. A third study was performed with a subset of six participants to examine performance over a range of SNRs. In this study, speech recognition was measured 12 to 17 mo after activation in quiet and at +5, +10, +15, and +20 dB SNRs using the same five uncorrelated noise sources. RESULTS: The speech-recognition data revealed a significant bilateral advantage of 3.3 dB using the adaptive-SNR method. A significant bilateral advantage of 9% was also measured using a fixed +10 dB SNR. Results from the second study revealed that experience resulted in a significant (11 to 20%) increase in speech-recognition-in-noise performance for both unilateral and bilateral modes; however, the magnitude of the bilateral advantage was not affected by experience. Results from the third study revealed the largest bilateral advantage at the poorest SNR evaluated. In addition, performance in quiet was significantly better than that measured in the presence of noise, even at the +20 dB SNR. CONCLUSIONS: The results of these experiments support a small but significant bilateral speech-recognition-in-noise advantage for cochlear implant recipients in an environment with multiple noise sources. This advantage is presumed to be attributable to the combined effects of binaural squelch and diotic summation. Although experience generally improved speech-recognition-in-noise performance in both unilateral and bilateral modes, a consistent bilateral advantage (approximately 10%) was measured at 4 to 7 mo and at 12 to 17 mo postactivation.     

Using hearing aid adaptive directional microphones to enhance cochlear implant performance

The goal of this study was to investigate whether adaptive microphone directionality could enhance cochlear implant performance. Speech stimuli were created by fitting a digital hearing aid with programmable omnidirectional (OM), fixed directional (FDM), or adaptive directional (ADM) microphones to KEMAR, and recording the hearing aid output in three noise conditions. The first condition simulated a diffused field with noise sources from five stationary locations, whereas the second and third condition represented one or three non-stationary locations in the back hemifield of KEMAR. Speech was always presented to 0° azimuth and the overall signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) was +5 dB in the sound field. Eighteen postlingually deafened cochlear implant users listened to the recorded test materials via the direct audio input of their speech processors. Their speech recognition ability and overall sound quality preferences were assessed and the correlation between the amount of noise reduction and the improvement in speech recognition were calculated. The results indicated that ADM yielded significantly better speech recognition scores and overall sound quality preference than FDM and OM in all three noise conditions and the improvement in speech recognition scores was highly correlated with the amount of noise reduction. Factors influencing the noise level are discussed.     

Residual hearing conservation and electroacoustic stimulation with the nucleus 24 contour advance cochlear implant.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the conservation of residual hearing in recipients of the Nucleus 24 Contour Advance cochlear implant (CI) and the benefits of combined electrical and acoustic stimulation. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective multicenter study. SETTING: CI clinics in Western Europe. PATIENTS: Adult candidates for conventional cochlear implantation with a minimum preoperative word recognition score of 10% in the ear to be implanted. INTERVENTION: "Soft-surgery" protocol, including a 1- to 1.2-mm anterior and inferior cochleostomy hole with the electrode array, inserted 17 mm using the "advance-off-stylet" technique. Patients with postoperative pure-tone hearing threshold levels (HTLs) of 80 dB hearing loss or less at 125 and 250 Hz and 90 dB hearing loss or less at 500 Hz were refitted with an in-the-ear hearing aid for combined ipsilateral electrical and acoustic (El-Ac) stimulation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: A questionnaire to collect information regarding surgery. Pure-tone HTLs measured at intervals. Word recognition tested in quiet and sentence recognition tested in noise at 10 and 5 dB signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). HEARING CONSERVATION RESULTS: HTL data were available for 27 patients. HTLs were conserved within 20 dB of preoperative levels for 33, 26, and 19% of patients for 125, 250, and 500 Hz, respectively. However, the recommended soft-surgery protocol was strictly followed in only 12 of 27 patients. For these 12 patients, hearing thresholds were conserved within 20 dB for 50, 50, and 33% of patients. Median threshold increases were 40 dB (range, 250-500 Hz) for the whole group and 23 dB for the strict surgery group. Ten patients retained sufficient HTLs to enter the El-Ac user group. SPEECH RECOGNITION RESULTS: Group mean recognition scores for nine El-Ac users for words presented at 65 dB sound pressure level were 45% for CI alone and 55% for CI + ipsilateral hearing aid (p < 0.05, paired t). For sentences presented in noise at 5 dB SNR, mean word scores were 46% CI alone and 56% CI + ipsilateral hearing aid (p < 0.01, paired t). CONCLUSION: Hearing was conserved for conventional candidates for cochlear implantation where the recommended soft-surgery protocol was strictly adhered. Combined ipsilateral electrical and acoustic stimulation provided considerable benefits for speech recognition in noise, equivalent to between 3 and 5 dB SNR, compared with CI alone.     

Preservation of hearing in cochlear implant surgery: advantages of combined electrical and acoustical speech processing

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: This study documents the importance of preserving residual low-frequency acoustic hearing as those with more residual hearing are selected for cochlear implantation. Surgical strategies used for hearing preservation with a short hybrid cochlear implant are outlined. The benefits of preserved residual low-frequency hearing, improved word understanding in noise, and music appreciation are described. STUDY DESIGN: Multicenter, prospective, single-subject design. METHODS: Records were reviewed of 21 individuals participating in an Food and Drug Administration (FDA) feasibility clinical trial who have received an Iowa/Nucleus 10 mm electrode. A second group of subjects receiving implants at the University of Iowa that have used the 10 mm device between 2 years and 6 months were also reviewed. Outcome measures included standardized tests of monosyllabic word understanding, spondees in noise, and common melody recognition. RESULTS: Low-frequency hearing was maintained in all individuals immediately postoperative. One subject lost hearing at 2.5 months postoperative after a viral infection. The group has averaged a loss of -9 dB low-frequency acoustic hearing between 125 and 1,000 Hz. Monosyllabic word understanding scores at 6 months for a group being followed for an FDA clinical trial using the implant plus hearing aids was 69% correct. For the long-term group receiving implants at Iowa, monosyllabic word understanding in those who have used the device between 6 months and 2 years is 79%. Other important findings include improved recognition of speech in noise (9 dB improvement) as compared with standard cochlear implant recipients who were matched for speech recognition in quiet and near normal recognition of common melodies. CONCLUSION: The surgical strategies outlined have been successful in preservation of low-frequency hearing in 96% of individuals. Combined electrical and acoustical speech processing has enabled this group of volunteers to gain improved word understanding as compared with their preoperative hearing with bilateral hearing aids and a group of individuals receiving a standard cochlear implant with similar experience with their device. The improvement of speech in noise and melody recognition is attributed to the ability to distinguish fine pitch differences as the result of preserved residual low-frequency acoustic hearing. Preservation of low-frequency acoustic hearing is important for improving speech in noise and music appreciation for the hearing impaired, both of which are important in real-life situations.     

Recent developments with the nucleus 22-electrode cochlear implant: a new two formant speech coding strategy and its performance in background noise

A clinical evaluation of speech processing strategies for the Nucleus 22-electrode cochlear implant showed improvements in understanding speech using the new FOF1F2 speech coding strategy instead of the F0F2 strategy. Significant improvement in closed-set speech recognition in the presence of background noise was an additional advantage of the new speech processing strategy.     

Sequential bilateral cochlear implant: results in children and adolescents

IntroductionThe use of the bilateral cochlear implants can promote the symmetrical development of the central auditory pathways, thus benefiting the development of auditory abilities and improving sound localization and the ability of auditory speech perception in situations of competitive noise.ObjectiveTo evaluate the ability of speech perception in children and adolescents using sequential bilateral cochlear implants, considering the association of these variables: age at surgery, time of device use and interval between surgeries.MethodsA total of 14 individuals between 10 and 16 years of age, who demonstrated surgical indication for the use of sequential bilateral cochlear implants as intervention in the auditory habilitation process, were assessed. The speech perception ability was assessed through sentence lists constructed in the Portuguese language, presented in two situations: in silence, with fixed intensity of 60 dB SPL, and in competitive noise, with a signal-to-noise ratio of +15 dB. The evaluation was performed under the following conditions: unilateral with the first activated cochlear implant, unilateral with the second activated cochlear implant and bilateral with both devices activated.ResultsThe results of the speech perception tests showed better performance in both silence and in noise for the bilateral cochlear implant condition when compared to the 1st cochlear implant and the 2nd cochlear implant alone. A worse result of speech perception was found using the 2nd cochlear implant alone. No statistically significant correlation was found between age at the surgical procedure, interval between surgeries and the time of use of the 2nd cochlear implant, and the auditory speech perception performance for all assessed conditions. The use of a hearing aid prior to the 2nd cochlear implant resulted in benefits for auditory speech perception with the 2nd cochlear implant, both in silence and in noise.ConclusionThe bilateral cochlear implant provided better speech perception in silence and in noise situations when compared to the unilateral cochlear implant, regardless of the interval between surgeries, age at the surgical procedure and the time of use of the 2nd cochlear implant. Speech perception with the 1st cochlear implant was significantly better than with the 2nd cochlear implant, both in silence and in noise. The use of the hearing aid prior to the 2nd cochlear implant influenced speech perception performance with the 2nd cochlear implant, both in silence and in noise.     

European multi-centre study of the Nucleus Hybrid L24 cochlear implant

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate the preservation of residual hearing in subjects who received the Nucleus Hybrid L24 cochlear implant. To investigate the performance benefits up to one year post-implantation in terms of speech recognition, sound quality, and quality of life. Design: Prospective, with sequential enrolment and within-subject comparisons. Post-operative performance using a Freedom Hybrid sound processor was compared with that of pre-operative hearing aids. Study sample: Sixty-six adult hearing-impaired subjects with bilateral severe-to-profound high frequency hearing loss. Results: Group median increase in air-conduction thresholds in the implanted ear for test frequencies 125–1000 Hz was < 15 dB across the population; both immediately and one year post-operatively. Eighty-eight percent of subjects used the Hybrid processor at one year post-op. Sixty-five percent of subjects had significant gain in speech recognition in quiet, and 73% in noise (≥ 20 percentage points/2 dB SNR). Mean SSQ subscale scores were significantly improved (+ 1.2, + 1.3, + 1.8 points, p < 0.001), as was mean HUI3 score (+ 0.117, p < 0.01). Combining residual hearing with CI gave 22?26 %age points mean benefit in speech recognition scores over CI alone (p < 0.01). Conclusions: Useful residual hearing was conserved in 88% of subjects. Speech perception was significantly improved over preoperative hearing aids, as was sound quality and quality of life.     

Speech recognition in noise for cochlear implantees with a two-microphone monaural adaptive noise reduction system

OBJECTIVE: In this study the performance of a noise reduction strategy applied to cochlear implants is evaluated. The noise reduction strategy is based on a 2-channel adaptive filtering strategy using two microphones in a single behind-the-ear hearing aid. DESIGN: Four adult LAURA cochlear implant users (Peeters et al., 1993) took part in the experiments. The tests included identification of monosyllabic CVC (consonant-vowel-consonant) words and measurements of the speech reception threshold (SRT) of lists of numbers, in background noise presented at 90 degrees relative to the 0 degrees frontal direction of the speech. Percent correct phoneme scores for the CVC words at signal to noise ratios (SNRs) of -5, 0, and +5 dB in steady speech-weighted noise at 60 dB SPL and SRTs for numbers in speech-weighted steady and nonsteady ICRA noise were both obtained in conditions with and without the noise reduction pre-processing. Physical SNR improvements of the noise reduction system are evaluated as well, as a function of the direction of the noise source. RESULTS: Highly significant improvements in speech understanding, corresponding on average to an SNR improvement of about 10 dB, were observed with this 2-channel adaptive filtering noise reduction strategy using both types of speech-noise test materials. These perceptual evaluations agree with physical evaluations and simulations of this noise reduction strategy. Taken together, these data demonstrate that cochlear implantees may increase their speech intelligibility in noisy environments with the use of multimicrophone noise reduction systems.     

Comparison of speech perception benefits with SPEAK and ACE coding strategies in pediatric Nucleus CI24M cochlear implant recipients

Nine congenitally deaf children who received a Nucleus CI24M cochlear implant and who were fitted with the SPrint speech processor participated in this study. All subjects were initially programmed with the SPEAK coding strategy and then converted to the ACE strategy. Speech perception was evaluated before and after conversion to the new coding strategy using word and Common Phrase speech recognition tests in both the presence and absence of noise. In quiet conditions, the mean percent correct scores for words were 68.8% with SPEAK and 91% with ACE; for phrases the percentage was 66.6% with SPEAK and 85.5% with ACE. In the presence of noise (at +10 dB signal-to-noise ratio), the mean percent correct scores for words were 43.3% with SPEAK compared to 84.4% with ACE; for phrases the percentage was 41.1% with SPEAK and 82.2% with ACE. Statistical analysis revealed significant improvement in open-set speech recognition with ACE compared to SPEAK. Preliminary data suggest that converting children from SPEAK to the ACE strategy improves their performance. Subjects showed significant improvements for open-set word and sentence recognition in quiet as well as in noise when ACE was used in comparison with SPEAK. The greatest improvements were obtained when tests were presented in the presence of noise.     

双侧植入人工耳蜗对儿童选择性听取能力影响的个案研究

目的探讨双侧人工耳蜗植入儿童在噪音环境下的选择性听取能力。方法采用实验法,研究个案在不同信噪比条件（SNR=0,10,20）下,单,双侧耳识别双音节词和短句的能力。测试使用计算机导航系统给声。结果在双音节词识别方面,当SNR=20和SNR=10时,单、双耳的识别率都为100％;但当SNR=0时,单、双耳识别率同时下降,结果较为接近。在短句识别方面,SNR=20和SNR=10时的结果相似,但单。双耳之间的差异较为明显;当SNR=0时,单、双耳识别率同时下降,结果较为接近。结论双侧人工耳蜗提高了该儿童在背景噪声中的选择性听取技能。SNR=20和SNR=10时,单耳和双耳的选择性听取能力都没有显著差异,但双耳明显好于单耳。在SNR=0时,单耳和双耳的选择性听取能力明显下降,且双耳和单耳差异缩小。