Tuberculosis after renal transplantation: experience of one Turkish centre

Background: In this study, renal transplant recipients with tuberculosis of different organs, were retrospectively analysed with respect to prevalence, outcome and drug toxicity. Patients and methods: In 520 patients, 22 (4.2%) tuberculosis of various organs was diagnosed. The time interval between transplantation and diagnosis of tuberculosis was 44.4±33.5 (range 3-111) months. In 18 (82%) of the patients, tuberculosis was detected after the first year of transplantation. The most common form was pleuro/pulmonary tuberculosis (54%), and other localizations included jejunum, liver, bone, and urogenital tract. Results: Sixteen of the 22 patients responded favourably to the treatment and maintain excellent allograft function, whereas six patients (27.2%) died. Toxic hepatitis was seen in four (18%) patients, and one case was complicated with acute hepatocellular failure due to isoniazide (INH). However, of the 23 patients at risk of tuberculosis who had had INH prophylaxis for 1 year, neither tuberculosis, nor hepatotoxicity was observed. Conclusion: Tuberculosis is a common infection of renal transplant recipients in developing countries. The peak incidence is after the first year of transplantation and mortality is considerable. Hepatoxicity is a considerable risk of treatment, possibly as a result of additive toxic effects of immunosuppressive drugs.     

Efficacy of isoniazid prophylaxis in renal allograft recipients

The efficacy of isoniazid (INH) prophylaxis in renal allograft recipients who are on long-term immunosuppression in a region highly prevalent for tuberculosis (TB) was studied. INH (300 mg/d in patients weighing more than 35 kg and 5 mg/kg/d in patients with <35 kg body weight) together with Pyridoxine 50 mg/d for 1 year was started in randomly assigned renal allograft recipients. Occurrence of clinical tuberculosis during the initial 2 years posttransplantation was observed in the risk group and patients at no risk. Risks were defined as acute rejection episodes and exposure to antirejection therapy, past history of TB completely or incompletely treated, radiological evidence of past tuberculosis, history of tuberculosis in close contacts. Among 480 patients registered in the study, INH prophylaxis was given to 219 randomly assigned renal allograft recipients. Results were compared among patients developing TB during the initial 2 years posttransplantation in both the groups. Risk factors were analyzed for comparison in both groups. No significant difference was observed in terms of past history of TB, TB in close contacts, episodes of acute rejection during the initial 3 months, and comorbidities such as cytomegalovirus infection, hepatitis C virus infection, and posttransplant diabetes. One patient from the INH group and 10 patients from the non-INH group developed TB during the initial 2 years posttransplantation (P < .0001). None of patients required discontinuation of INH. INH was observed to be safe and effective as a chemoprophylactic agent in renal allograft recipients.     

Liver transplantation without isoniazid prophylaxis for recipients with a history of tuberculosis

Abstract:  Tuberculosis remains one of the most serious infections after organ transplantation. Isoniazid prophylaxis for liver transplant recipients with a history of tuberculosis is generally recommended. However, its benefit is controversial because of potential hepatotoxicity of isoniazid. It is crucial to determine appropriate post-transplant managements for the recipients with a history of tuberculosis. The purpose of this study was to investigate the necessity of isoniazid prophylaxis for liver transplant recipients who had a history of tuberculosis. The medical records of 1116 liver transplant recipients were studied, of whom seven had a history of tuberculosis (0.63%). One who underwent living-donor liver transplantation for fulminant hepatic failure was excluded from evaluation because of early death, caused by bacterial sepsis two months after transplantation, although reactivation of tuberculosis was not observed. The median observation period after transplantation was 25.5 months (range 12–82). Reactivation of tuberculosis did not occur in any of these six patients. In conclusion, we could not find rationale for isoniazid prophylaxis in liver transplant recipients with past diagnosis of tuberculosis, when the disease is considered to be inactive. Tuberculosis should be considered as cause of post-transplant infections, and careful post-transplant observations are essential for an early diagnosis.     

Tuberculosis in Egyptian kidney transplant recipients: study of clinical course and outcome

BACKGROUND: Tuberculosis (TB) is an important infection encountered post-transplantation especially in developing countries, with high incidences of morbidity and mortality. In this report, we study the risk factors and impact of TB on the outcome of kidney transplantation. METHODS: Of 1200 live-donor Egyptian kidney transplantations, 45 (3.8%) patients developed post-transplant TB. Of these, five had had TB pre-transplantation and 40 were male. The mean age was 32.6 +/- 10.5 years. Primary immunosuppression treatment for 39 (86.7%) patients was cyclosporine (CsA). RESULTS: The mean time interval between transplantation and TB diagnosis was 49.8 +/- 41.5 (range 2-180) months. In 86.7% of patients, TB was diagnosed one year post-transplantation. Urinary TB was the most common form (53%), while pleuropulmonary TB accounted for 38%. All post-transplant TB patients received a triple anti-tuberculous therapy (rifampicin, ethambutol and INH) with a favorable response in all but two patients who needed another 24-month course. Hepatotoxicity was seen in 11 patients, eight were mild with normalization after temporary withdrawal of rifampicin, and three cases were severe, but mortality was not attributable to hepatocellular failure. Twelve patients died, 11 of them due to unrelated causes. Chronic rejection occurred in more than half of the patients (55.6%), of whom 24 (96%) were CsA-treated, which can be attributed to rifampicin/CsA interaction. More than 35% of TB patients lost their graft as a result. Pre-transplant tuberculosis patients had a comparable post-transplant course. CONCLUSIONS: TB is a common infection in renal transplant recipients with a peak incidence occurring one year post-transplant. Chronic rejection is a serious complication that had a negative impact on the graft survival, especially in CsA-treated recipients. INH prophylaxis is safe in pre-transplant TB. The post-transplantation outcome in the pre-transplant tuberculosis patients is no different from non-TB patients.     

Prevalence and manifestations of tuberculosis in renal transplant recipients: a single-center experience in Thailand

This retrospective review presented the prevalence and manifestations of tuberculosis among renal transplant recipients in our center between 1987 and mid 2007. The prevalence of tuberculosis was 5/151 (3.3%) recipients with a median age of 49 years (range = 38-55). The median time of diagnosis after transplantation was 23 months (range = 1-47). All five patients had pulmonary tuberculosis. None developed extrapulmonary infection. Presenting symptoms were fever (60%), productive cough (80%), weight loss (40%), and hemoptysis (20%). One patient had non-parathyroid-related hypercalcemia. Cyclosporine dosage needed to be increased in all patients. Two subjects who experienced side effects of hepatitis and/or jaundice from rifampicin were switched to second-line drugs. Infection with Mycobacterial tuberculosis is a not uncommon problem in renal transplant recipients especially in endemic areas. Tuberculosis must be excluded for immunosuppressed patients with clinical or radiological suspicion.     

Tuberculosis in Renal Transplant Recipients: A Brazilian Center Registry

Renal transplant recipients receiving immunosuppression show an increased risk for developing opportunistic infections, such as tuberculosis (TB). TB represents the major cause of morbidity and mortality in the world, mainly in underdeveloped countries. The aim of this study was to analyze the incidence of TB and its presentation among renal transplant recipients over 20 years.

Patients and Methods

This retrospective analysis included medical records of renal transplant recipients from January 1984 to April 2007.

Results

Among 1342 renal transplant recipients, 31 received treatment for TB due to clinical disease (n = 23) or prophylaxis (n = 8). The overall incidence of TB was 1.71%, which was diagnosed at 53 ± 49 months posttransplantation. The indications for TB prophylaxis were a previous history of TB (n = 6) or direct contact with a TB carrier (n = 1). The most common clinical presentation was extrapulmonary (n = 13). The classical treatment was effective in 16 cases. However, 7 cases of resistant TB required ethambutol added to therapy. Adverse events of treatment included liver toxicity (n = 1) and peripheral neuropathy (n = 1). Three patients died due to TB-related complications. Graft loss was observed in 3 patients after cessation of TB treatment. None of the patients on prophylaxis developed clinical disease.

Conclusions

TB incidence was significantly greater among renal transplant recipients compared with the local population, with a higher incidence of extrapulmonary disease. TB prophylaxis in selected cases was effective, avoiding new infections.     

Challenge of tuberculosis in renal transplantation

There is very high incidence of tuberculosis (TB) in dialysis and renal transplant (RT) recipients in developing countries. Clinical manifestation of TB may be atypical or obscure in initial stages. Common clinical abnormalities include pyrexia, pulmonary infiltrates, exudative pleural effusion, and exudative ascites. Aggressive investigations must be done in patients with pyrexia, pulmonary abnormalities, scanty sputum, and weight loss. BAL and computed tomography (CT) scan of the chest should be done in such cases. Tuberculin skin test is not helpful in the majority of patients. New blood tests to quantitate PPD reactivity in vivo and tests to distinguish between latent M tuberculosis infection from BCG-induced reactivity have been devised recently. Side effects of anti-TB drugs, especially hepatitis, need close observation because of the frequent occurrence of viral hepatitis in such cases. Tests to confirm latent TB are desirable before starting chemoprophylaxis in RT recipients. INH prophylaxis cannot be recommended universally in all RT recipients.     

Hepatitis B infection and renal transplantation: the absence of anti-delta antibodies and the possible beneficial effect of silymarin during acute episodes of hepatic dysfunction

The incidence of hepatitis B infection among renal transplant recipients was reviewed. Among 90 patients, 13 were HBsAg positive prior to renal transplantation. Episodes of hepatic dysfunction were seen in eight and one died of fulminating hepatitis and disseminated tuberculosis. Silymarin, a herbal extract, appears to confer some benefits in ameliorating hepatic dysfunction. Antibodies to the delta agent were not detected during any of these episodes. One patient contracted hepatitis B after transplantation and rapid reduction in steroid dose was associated with deterioration of liver function. He developed antibodies and cleared the virus. Four HBsAg-negative patients received kidneys from HBsAg positive donors without becoming HBsAg positive.     

Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in solid organ transplant recipients: experience from a single center in China

OBJECTIVE: We sought to explore the prevalence, clinical manifestations, diagnostic procedures, and treatment of tuberculosis (TB) after solid organ transplantation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this study, we retrospectively analyzed data of 1947 renal transplant recipients and 85 liver transplant recipients. RESULTS: TB developed in 28 organ transplant recipients with a prevalence of 1.38% (28/2032). The median interval between transplantation and development of TB was 32 months (range, 1-142 months). Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolation, histologic signs of caseating granulomas, and TB-DNA detection directly supported the diagnosis in 10 (35.71%), 7 (25.00%), and 5 (17.86%) patients, respectively. In addition, 6 patients (21.43%) highly suspected of TB infection received tentative antituberculosis treatment with favorable responses. Most renal transplant recipients (22/25; 78.57%) received isoniazid, rifampicin (or rifabutin), and ethambutal (or pyrazinamide) for a mean duration of 10 months (range, 6-14 months). Three liver transplant recipients received a different protocol: isoniazid, rifabutin, ethambutal, and ofloxacin for 3 months; then isoniazid and rifabutin for 6 months. Upon follow-up, 8 subjects (28.57%) died; 5 of the deaths were related to TB. During the antituberculosis therapy, toxic hepatitis was seen in 12 patients (42.86%); cyclosporine levels decreased in 15 patients (53.57%); and allograft rejection developed in 6 of them. CONCLUSIONS: The peak incidences of TB in liver and kidney transplantations are in the first year and after the first year posttransplantation, respectively. Response to antituberculosis treatment should be considered to make a diagnosis among patients highly suspected of TB infections. Except in special circumstances, antituberculosis treatment protocols including isoniazid and rifampicin for about 10 months seem significantly effective and tolerable for non-liver transplant patients. Fluoroquinolones should be emphasized in posttransplantation TB treatment.     

Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection and laboratory diagnosis in solid-organ transplant recipients

Tuberculosis (TB) is an unusual infection in transplant recipients. We evaluated (i) the frequency of TB, (ii) the duration to develop the TB infection, and (iii) clinical consequences, in 380 solid-organ recipients from January 1995 to December 2000. A total of 10 (2.63%) patients (eight renal, two liver transplant recipients) were found to have post-transplantation TB. The frequency of TB in this patient population is 8.5-fold higher than the prevalance in the general Turkish population. Tuberculosis developed within 2-33 months after transplantation, with a median of 15 months. In all of these 10 patients, Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) was isolated from the culture. All the patients continued to have low dose immunosuppressive treatment, and also quadriple antituberculosis treatment [isoniazid (INH), rifampin (RIF), pyrazinamide (PRZ) and ethambutol (ETB)] has been given. The two recipients had died of disseminated form of TB. Relapse was detected in one patient 6 months after the completion of the treatment. As post-transplant TB infection develops mostly within the first year after transplantation, clinicians should be more careful for early and fast diagnosis and treatment should be started immediately.     

Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in renal transplant recipients

Mycobacterium tuberculosis (TB) infection is more common among renal allograft recipients compared with the general population due to immunosuppression. The epidemiological risk in a country is an important determinant of transplant TB after transplantation. We retrospectively analyzed 283 renal transplant recipients who underwent renal transplantation between 1990 and 2004. We evaluated the incidence, patient and disease characteristics, prognosis, and outcome of TB infection. Tuberculosis developed in 10 (seven men and three women of mean age of 41+/-9 years) among 283 patients (3.1%). All patients were culture-positive for M tuberculosis. Although pulmonary TB was the most common presentation in the general population, 50% of patients in the study group developed extrapulmonary TB. The mean elapsed time from renal transplantation was 38 months. Three patients (1%) developed TB in the first year after transplantation. All patients were treated with a quartet of anti-TB therapy. One patient developed isoniazid-related reversible hepatotoxicity. No acute allograft rejection occurred during the anti-TB therapy. Two patients (20%) with pulmonary TB died due to dissemination of the disease. In conclusion, extrapulmonary presentations of TB are more common among renal transplant recipients with the increased risk of mortality.     

Safety of treatment of latent tuberculosis infection in compensated cirrhotic patients during transplant candidacy period

BACKGROUND: Treatment of latent tuberculosis infection with isoniazid (INH) or rifampin (RIF) is controversial in liver transplant candidates due to potential hepatotoxicity. In this study, treatment of latent tuberculosis during transplant candidacy period is explored, and relevant literature is reviewed. METHODS: Liver transplant candidates with latent tuberculosis infection by positive tuberculin skin test (>5 mm) were prospectively enrolled and treated with 9 months of INH or 4 months of RIF, and were monitored monthly for their liver enzyme profiles, adverse effects, compliance, and completion rate. RESULTS: Four of nine patients with INH had asymptomatic, mild elevations of aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or alanine aminotransferase (ALT) versus none of five patients in the RIF group. Two cases of elevations were attributed to INH. Two other cases were attributed to alcoholism or active chronic hepatitis B virus infection. Only one patient in the INH group experienced symptoms possibly attributed to INH hepatotoxicity. Compliance was 100% per patient reporting. Completion rates were 79% for INH and 100% for RIF. No fulminant hepatic failure or death was observed. CONCLUSION: Treatment of latent tuberculosis in liver transplant patients during their candidacy with INH or RIF appears to be a safe, viable option, if carefully monitored for adverse effects and liver enzymes.     

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt after adult liver transplantation: experience in eight patients.

BACKGROUND: Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunting (TIPS) has become an effective treatment for the complications of portal hypertension. We assessed the feasibility and outcome of TIPS in liver transplant recipients. METHODS: During the period from December 1992 to January 1998, eight adults presenting recurrent hepatitis C virus (five patients) and hepatitis B virus (one patient) infection, veno-occlusive disease (one patient), and secondary biliary cirrhosis (one patient) had TIPS because of refractory ascites (five patients), bleeding esophageal varices (one patient), refractory hepatic hydrothorax (one patient), retransplantation (two patients), and redo-biliary surgery (one patient). RESULTS: In two patients, the procedure was difficult due to cavo-caval implantation. Ascites, hydrothorax, and variceal bleeding were controlled in all patients. Moderate to severe encephalopathy developed in four patients; two patients had worsening of their existing encephalopathy. Three of five patients treated with cyclosporine needed a drastic dose reduction due to the development of severe side effects. No long-term survivor developed shunt stenosis or occlusion. Two patients did moderately well at 6 and 14 months, respectively; the former died due to chronic rejection while waiting for a retransplantation. Three did well at 14, 36, and 28 months, respectively; the latter patient died of liver failure 32 months after TIPS. One jaundiced patient died after 1.5 months due to necrotic pancreatitis. Two patients died after 4 and 8.5 months, respectively, due to liver failure; the latter was doing well until 7 months after TIPS. CONCLUSIONS: TIPS is feasible in transplant recipients in cases of decompensated allograft cirrhosis, of allograft veno-occlusive disease or when retransplantation or redo-biliary surgery are scheduled in the presence of portal hypertension. At transplantation, the surgeon should keep in mind the eventuality of a later TIPS procedure. Close immunosuppression monitoring is warranted because modified metabolization of cyclosporine (and probably tacrolimus) may cause serious side effects.     

Transmission of tuberculosis by kidney transplantation

Tuberculosis occurred in two patients, each of whom received a kidney from the same cadaver donor whose cerebrospinal fluid cultures grew Mycobacteria following organ donation. Although the degree of immunosuppression and graft function were similar in the recipients, one died of disseminated tuberculosis. Kidneys contaminated with certain pathogens, including Mycobacteria, should not be transplanted. Transplant recipients with tuberculosis require prompt antituberculous therapy, and may require transplant nephrectomy for persistent evidence of urinary tract tuberculosis.     

Prospective randomised trial of isoniazid prophylaxis in renal transplant recipient

Renal transplantation (RT) recipients are at a high risk of developing tuberculosis (TB) following transplantation. Effectiveness of isoniazid (INH) in preventing TB is well documented in immunocompetent as well as immunocompromised persons. There is paucity of data on role of INH prophylaxis in RT recipients. Thus, a prospective randomised trial of INH in RT recipients was carried out to determine the efficacy of daily INH monotherapy in the prevention of TB in these patients. Patients of end stage renal disease (ESRD) taken for RT formed the subjects of study. Patients with active TB and active hepatitis at the time of RT were excluded from the study. Patients were randomised to receive INH 300 mg with pyridoxine 20 mg daily from the day of RT. The duration of the treatment was planned for 1 year or till the development of TB, which ever was earlier. Between October 1998 and September 2000, 114 RT were done at our hospital. Of these, 24 (21%) patients had active TB at the time of RT and thus were excluded. Patients included were randomised with 1:2 ratio of treatment and control group. Of the 90 patients thus enrolled, 30 were randomised in treatment group and 60 in control group. Of the included patients five patients had very early graft loss (three in treatment and two in control group) within days and thus excluded from the analysis. Three of the 27 (11.1%) patients in treatment group and 15 (25.8%) in control group developed TB (P = 0.10). The risk ratio of (RR) of INH versus control group of TB was 0.36 (95% CI, 0.10–1.32) but the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.12). Only one patient developed INH induced hepatitis. In conclusion, with INH prophylaxis, there was a trend towards protection from TB, though it was not statistically significant. Further, all patients tolerated INH and hepatotoxicity was not a major problem in this group of patients.     

Centrilobular fibrosis in long-term follow-up of pediatric liver transplant recipients

BACKGROUND: Centrilobular fibrosis after liver transplant in adults is caused mainly by viral hepatitis, chronic rejection, and azathioprine toxicity. The aim of this study was to investigate possible etiologies and the long-term outcome of this lesion in children. METHODS: We identified centrilobular fibrosis in 12 of 117 pediatric liver transplant recipients who were investigated for persistent elevations in aminotransferases. Etiologic factors, histologic features on serial biopsies, and clinical and biochemical changes over time were noted for 8 recipients in whom a readily identifiable cause was not apparent. RESULTS: Centrilobular fibrosis developed a mean of 1.7 years (range: 30 days-3.6 years) posttransplantation in patients receiving cyclosporine, azathioprine, and prednisone. Centrilobular fibrosis was always associated with portal fibrosis and, in six recipients, with persistent, low-grade, cellular rejection. None demonstrated chronic cholestasis, ductopenia, or identifiable vasculopathy. Ischemic, viral, and autoimmune etiologies were excluded. Discontinuing azathioprine did not lead to biochemical or histological improvement. After changing to tacrolimus, aminotransferases normalized in three recipients and repeat biopsies in six were unchanged during a further 2 years of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Centrilobular fibrosis may develop in a small number of pediatric liver transplant recipients, resulting in considerable difficulties in biopsy interpretation. It is not associated with viral hepatitis nor with classical features of chronic rejection. The prognostic significance of centrilobular fibrosis is uncertain, although no child has required retransplantation in up to 12 years of follow-up. A role for a low-grade, chronic form of cellular rejection heralded by persistent, variable, and otherwise unexplained elevations in aminotransferases is suggested.     

Hepatocellular carcinoma in renal transplant recipients

OBJECTIVE: Renal transplant recipients display an increased risk of malignancy due to long-term immunosuppression. The type and incidence of malignancies vary geographically. Hepatocelluar carcinoma (HCC) is a leading cause of malignancy in posttransplantation recipients in Taiwan, which is an endemic area for hepatitis B. We performed a retrospective study to investigate the clinical features of HCC among our renal transplant recipients. METHODS: Between 1988 and 2006, 15 patients of the 554 kidney recipients followed up at our transplantation clinic were diagnosed with HCC. The medical records corresponding to these 15 patients were reviewed for age, gender, initial presentation and symptoms, posttransplant duration, immunosuppressive regimens, graft and patient survival, treatment of HCC, and outcomes. RESULTS: Fifteen recipients developed HCC, (2.7%), of whom 11 were men. Four patients were hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-positive, 4 were anti-hepatitis C antibody (anti-HCV Ab)-positive, and another 7 were negative for HBsAg and/or anti-HCV Ab. The mean age at the time of HCC diagnosis was 52 +/- 12 years, with a mean posttransplantation duration to HCC of 83 +/- 48.4 months. Over a follow-up period of 59.9 +/- 39.1 months, 8 patients remained alive and 7 died. Among these 7 individuals, 6 had no treatment for HCC and died rapidly (<3 months) and, 1 underwent hepatic lobectomy but died 6 months later due to liver failure. All 8 surviving patients received treatment: 4 underwent transarterial embolization (TAE) and the other 4 underwent surgery. As of July 2006, the average survival was 68 months. Three of these 8 patients had graft failure, including 2 whom have returned to maintenance hemodialysis and 1 who had a successful second graft. CONCLUSION: HCC is a major cancer among renal recipients in Taiwan. In our center the outcomes of treatable patients were good. Our study revealed that either TAE or surgery resulted in excellent survival rates. It is necessary to adjust the immunosuppressive regimen in patients with HCC and to detect a malignancy at an early stage to improve the outcomes.     

Cytomegalovirus infections in cardiac transplant patients: an experience at a clinical hospital, university of Chile

BACKGROUND: Since cytomegalovirus (CMV) infects between 20% and 50% of heart transplant patients, we reviewed our experience in 7 cases of this infection. METHODS: A prospective analysis of CMV infection was performed in heart transplant patients who received cyclosporine, azathioprine, or mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisone. An elevated creatinine de novo was managed with antibody induction. RESULTS: Between August 2001 and December 2005, we performed 22 heart transplants and 1 heart plus kidney transplant. Twenty-two patients were positive for CMV before transplantation. One patient died early because of graft failure. Immunosuppression included cyclosporine and prednisone (100%), azathioprine (52%), or mycophenolate (47%). Two recipients were induced with thymoglobulin and 13 with Daclizumab, while 8 did not receive any antibody. Nineteen patients received prophylaxis for CMV. Seven patients (30%) showed CMV infection, 6 of whom had received prophylaxis. Symptoms started at an average of 107 days posttransplantation in patients with prophylaxis. Three patients had gastritis, 2 pneumonia, and 1 colitis. One patient had concomitant lung aspergillosis. The two patients who received ATG developed CMV infections; 3 of the 12 with Daclizumab; and 2 who did not receive antibody. Of the CMV-infected subjects, 5 were on azathioprine and 2 on mycophenolate. All patients were treated with gancyclovir. The 1 patient with concomitant aspergillosis died. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of infection by CMV was 30%. Prophylaxis seemed to delay infection. Daclizumab induction did not increase the risk for CMV.     

Disseminated varicella infection in pediatric renal transplant recipients treated with mycophenolate mofetil.

BACKGROUND: Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is a new immune suppressive agent, effective in the prevention of acute rejection after renal transplantation. METHODS: The study was a retrospective review of records of pediatric renal transplant recipients from 1985 to the present. RESULTS: Since October 1995, the immune suppression protocol for pediatric renal transplant recipients at Mayo Eugenio Litta Children's Hospital has included MMF, prednisone, and cyclosporine A. During that time, 19 children and adolescents have received renal allografts, 17 of whom were seropositive for varicella antibody before transplantation, while 2 were seronegative. Varicella infection occurred in 3 of 19 patients (15.8%), all 3 of whom had serologically documented immunity to varicella virus before transplantation. All episodes occurred within 12 months of transplantation. All had generalized vesicular lesions without dermatomal distribution. None of the patients developed fever, respiratory, mucocutaneous, or central nervous system manifestations. All were managed with oral acyclovir, and had an uncomplicated recovery without neuralgia. By contrast, of 74 consecutive patients transplanted before use of MMF, only 1 patient (1.4%) had varicella infection after transplantation (P=0.026). CONCLUSION: The enhanced immunosuppression achieved with MMF appears to be associated with increased susceptibility to varicella infection.     

Nocardiosis in tropical renal transplant recipients

BACKGROUND: The epidemiology of nocardiosis in the tropics among renal transplant recipients has not been reported. METHODS: An evaluation of nocardiosis for 30 yr in one of the large transplant centres in South Asian region. RESULTS: Of the 1968 patients who received primary renal allografts at Christian Medical College & Hospital, 27 patients developed nocardiosis over 30 yr. Early nocardiosis (2 yr). Seventeen patients (63%) had two or more associated post-transplant infections, of whom 10 had tuberculosis. Mortality in these patients was associated with chronic liver disease. CONCLUSIONS: Nocardiosis manifests earlier (<2 yr) in CsA treated patients who have chronic liver disease. Among renal transplant recipients of the tropics nocardiosis is a marker of a high susceptibility to tuberculosis and other infections, the association with tuberculosis is stronger in those developing early nocardiosis (<2 yr). Chronic liver disease is a risk factor for death in patients with nocardiosis especially when associated with tuberculosis. This report constitutes the largest single centre experience among renal transplant recipients.