The effect of an augmentation patella prosthesis versus patelloplasty on revision patellar kinematics and quadriceps tendon force: an ex vivo study

The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of 2 revision reconstructive interventions on patellofemoral joint mechanics in comparison to control. We flexed 8 cadaver knee specimens from 0 degrees to 60 degrees of flexion in a test rig designed to simulate weight-bearing flexion and extension (Oxford rig). Quadriceps tendon extensor force and patellar kinematics were recorded for control total knee arthroplasty (TKA) (normal primary TKA with patella resurfaced) and then for each of the 2 revision patellar interventions (after patelloplasty of typical revision knee patellar bone defect to leave a simple bony shell, and after TKA with augmentation patella resurfacing). Our results demonstrate that patellar kinematics and quadriceps extensor force are optimized when the patella is reconstructed to normal anteroposterior thickness.     

The effect of patella preparation for total knee arthroplasty on patellar strain: a comparison of resurfacing versus inset implants

This study was conceived to quantify variables in surgical technique that may lead to patellar fracture after total knee arthroplasty. Anterior surface strain on load-bearing cadaveric patellae was measured before and after patellar resurfacing or inset prosthesis placement. Variables studied were i) the type of prosthesis (resurfacing vs inset), ii) the depth of reaming or osteotomy during surface preparation, and iii) the overall thickness of the polyethylene/patella composite after implantation. Comparison of measured patellar surface strain patterns for the different prosthesis styles, which were implanted at varying depths, provided statistically significant data from which the following clinically relevant conclusions can be made: i) Patellar resurfacing is superior to inset prosthesis placement when comparing postoperative patellar strain (22% vs 28% increase in strain compared with preoperative values). ii) Osteotomy for patellar resurfacing is more tolerant to error by excess cutting than is reaming for inset prosthesis placement (25% vs 42% increase in strain with a 2-mm error). iii) If the ideal depth of cut or reaming is surpassed, attempts to re-create the original patellar thickness by using a thicker prosthesis are mechanically detrimental. Key words: patella, strain, resurfacing, complications.     

Outcomes of patellar resurfacing versus nonresurfacing in total knee arthroplasty: a 9-year experience based on a case series of scorpio PS knees

Patellar resurfacing during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is an actively debated issue. This prospective study addresses fundamental questions regarding whether to resurface the patella. To do this, we compared clinical results of Scorpio PS knees with and without patellar resurfacing to determine whether there was any statistically significant difference in survivorship, function, pain, and radiographic analyses. Our study failed to demonstrate any statistical difference between the 2 groups (resurfaced versus nonresurfaced) according to knee pain, walking abilities, stair climbing, range of motion, and radiologic findings, as well as cross-correlations between patellar pain and age, gender, obesity, or etiology. Our radiologic findings did not reveal any failures of bony structures facing the metallic flange. Some knee designs can thus be seen as "patella friendly." Given the significant cost of patella resurfacing and the resulting well-known complications, we continue to avoid systematic resurfacing of the patella during Scorpio TKA.     

Treatment of the patella at reimplantation for septic total knee arthroplasty

The results of treatment of the patella at the time of aseptic revision of a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have been better with resurfacing of the patella than other modes of treatment such as leaving a bony shell. Treatment of the patella at the time of reimplantation of a TKA has not been addressed in prior studies. The ability to resurface the patella will be determined by the amount of bone remaining, integrity of the patella, vascularity, the location of the joint line, and soft tissue coverage for wound closure. The current review addresses the technique of patellar resurfacing and patellar bone defect treatment at the time of reimplantation of a TKA.     

Freehand resection of the patella in total knee arthroplasty referencing the attachments of the quadriceps tendon and patellar tendon

A freehand technique of patellar resurfacing using anatomic references was prospectively evaluated. This technique utilizes an osteotomy beginning at the inferior pole of the patella just posterior to the insertion of the patellar tendon and is carried proximally posterior to the insertion of the quadriceps tendon. Evaluation of 55 total knee arthroplasties in 41 patients showed an average restored patellar thickness within 0.1 mm. The overall patellar thickness was restored to within 1 mm of its preoperative thickness in 50 (91%) of 55 knees. Patellar tilt was equal to or less than 4° in 42 (89%) of 47 arthroplasties evaluated radiographically. The patellar thickness averaged 17.9 mm, well above the critical value of 15 mm reported in the literature.     

Use of a trabecular metal patella for marked patella bone loss during revision total knee arthroplasty

This study evaluates the short-term results following patellar resurfacing with a trabecular metal patella shell in the setting of marked patellar bone loss at the time of revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Twenty consecutive patients undergoing revision TKA with the use of a trabecular metal patella were evaluated at a mean 23-month follow-up. All patients had marked patellar bone loss at surgery precluding resurfacing with a standard cemented patellar button. Results were good or excellent in 17 of 20 patients. There were no displacements of any trabecular metal patella shells, and the fixation appeared excellent despite the poor quality of bone remaining. Complications included 3 patients with polar patella fractures postoperatively. Qualitatively, these results compare favorably with patellar resection arthroplasty in this setting.     

Contact stresses with an unresurfaced patella in total knee arthroplasty: the effect of femoral component design

Compressive contact stresses between the patella and the anterior femur were measured with a digital electronic sensor before and after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in 10 cadaver knee specimens. Contact stresses were measured first in normal knees, then after TKA with the Insall-Burstein Total Condylar, Miller Galante II, Ortholoc II, Porous Coated Anatomic, and Profix knee prostheses implanted without resurfacing the patella. The Insall-Burstein, Miller-Galante II, and Ortholoc II prostheses had significantly higher contact stresses than the normal knee throughout the flexion arc. The Porous Coated Anatomic, which has a smooth patellar groove, maintained contact area as in the normal knee and did not have significantly higher contact stresses at flexion angles <90 degrees. At flexion angles > or =105 degrees, patellofemoral contact occurred in two small areas as the patella encountered the intercondylar notch in all components except the Profix. The Profix maintained full contact and low compressive stresses throughout the full flexion arc because of its posteriorly extended patellar groove. Design features of the patellofemoral portion of TKA components are important factors that affect contact stresses in the patellofemoral joint. These features likely will affect the clinical results of TKA with an unresurfaced patella.     

Patellar resurfacing complications in total knee arthroplasty

Purpose

The ideal management of the patella during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is still controversial. Patellar retention is generally associated with an increased rate of anterior knee pain; however, patient satisfaction is similar in cases of replacement or retention. When the patella is replaced, potential severe complications can occur. Aim of this study was to retrospectively review results of a continuous series of patients having been treated with TKA and patella resurfacing.

Methods

The charts of 1,600 consecutive total knee prostheses were analysed to evaluate the rate of patellar resurfacing. All implants were posterior stabilized; 310 patients having received a patellar replacement were reviewed at follow-up (FU) examination. Complete physical examination as well as administration of the Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) score was performed. X-rays analysis included weightbearing anteroposterior (AP) and lateral views of the injured knee and bilateral skyline views at 30° flexion.

Results

Two hundred and eighty patients were available for clinical and imaging investigation at an average FU of 96 (58–144) months. Mean age at the time of surgery was 70 (62–80) years. Mean HSS score was 85.9 ± 7.6. The overall rate of patellofemoral complications was 7 % (19 cases); 13 patients claimed anterior knee pain, five had symptomatic patellar maltracking and one had patellar component loosening.

Conclusion

Our data are in accordance with those available in the literature. Recent meta-analyses demonstrated lower risk of re-operation after patellar resurfacing. However, when complications of the resurfaced patella occur, they can be potentially catastrophic events.     

Similar patient-reported outcomes and performance after total knee arthroplasty with or without patellar resurfacing: A randomized study of 74 patients with 6 years of follow-up

Background and purpose — Knee pain after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is not uncommon. Patellar retention in TKA is one cause of postoperative knee pain, and may lead to secondary addition of a patellar component. Patellar resurfacing in TKA is controversial. Its use ranges from 2% to 90% worldwide. In this randomized study, we compared the outcome after patellar resurfacing and after no resurfacing. Patients and methods — We performed a prospective, randomized study of 74 patients with primary osteoarthritis who underwent a Triathlon CR TKA. The patients were randomized to either patellar resurfacing or no resurfacing. They filled out the VAS pain score and KOOS questionnaires preoperatively, and VAS pain, KOOS, and patient satisfaction 3, 12, and 72 months postoperatively. Physical performance tests were performed preoperatively and 3 months postoperatively. Results — We found similar scores for VAS pain, patient satisfaction, and KOOS 5 subscales at 3, 12, and 72 months postoperatively in the 2 groups. Physical performance tests 3 months postoperatively were also similar in the 2 groups. No secondary resurfacing was performed in the group with no resurfacing during the first 72 months Interpretation — Patellar resurfacing in primary Triathlon CR TKA is of no advantage regarding pain, physical performance, KOOS 5 subscales, or patient satisfaction compared to no resurfacing. None of the patients were reoperated with secondary addition of a patellar component within 6 years. According to these results, routine patellar resurfacing in primary Triathlon TKA appears to be unnecessary.     

Anatomic dimensions of the patella measured during total knee arthroplasty

The anatomic measurements of 92 patellae with normal underlying bony structure were studied during total knee arthroplasty before and after resection of the articular surface. The articular surface of the patella was found to have an oval shape with a width-to-height ratio (46 x 36 mm) of 1.30. The dome was 4.8 mm high and displaced medially 3.6 mm. The medial facet was slightly thicker than the lateral facet (18 vs 17 mm). The lateral facet is 25% wider than the medial facet. Coverage provided by oval patellar prostheses was significantly better than with round prostheses. The patellae in women were significantly smaller than in men. Size differences and deformity need to be taken into account when the patella is prepared for resurfacing. It is recommended that the bony resection should be no greater than one third of the maximum patellar thickness to avoid alteration of normal bony structure. Key words: patella, total knee arthroplasty, anatomy.     

Asymmetric patella resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty

Three hundred consecutive primary, cemented, condylar total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) were reviewed for the presence of asymmetric patella resurfacing using a postoperative Merchant or sunrise patellar radiograph. Twenty-one knees in 14 patients were found to have the patella asymmetrically resurfaced. Asymmetric resurfacing typically involved the inadvertent preferential resurfacing of the lateral facet with underresection of bone from the medial patellar facet. All patients underwent follow-up for a minimum of 5 years, with a mean follow-up of 7.5 years. Of the 21 knees, 3 revisions were required for patellar complications. One patellar component was loose on radiographs and there was marked patellofemoral pain in 6 knees. Overall, 11 of 21 knees (52%) underwent revision or were recommended for revision for patellar complications or had anterior knee pain that limited activities. Inadvertent asymmetric patella resurfacing using the kinematic condylar implant adversely affects the outcome after TKA.     

Quantitative measurement of patellofemoral joint stability: force-displacement behavior of the human patella in vitro.

Patellofemoral joint instability is a common clinical problem. However, little quantitative data are available describing the stability characteristics of this joint. We measured the stability of the patella against both lateral and medial displacements across a range of knee flexion angles while the quadriceps were loaded physiologically. For eight fresh-frozen knee specimens a materials testing machine was used to displace the patella 10 mm laterally and 10 mm medially while measuring the required force, with 175 N quadriceps tension. The patella was connected via a ball-bearing patellar mounting 10 mm deep to the anterior surface to allow natural tilt and other rotations. Patellar force-displacement behavior was tested at flexion angles of 0 degrees, 10 degrees, 20 degrees, 30 degrees, 45 degrees, 60 degrees, and 90 degrees. Significant differences were found between the lateral and medial restraining forces at 10 mm displacement. For lateral displacement, the restraining force was least at 20 degrees of knee flexion (74 N at 10 mm displacement), rising to 125 N at 0 degrees and 90 degrees of knee flexion. The restraining force increased progressively with knee flexion for medial patellar displacement, from 147 N at 0 degrees to 238 N at 90 degrees. With quadriceps tension, the patella was more resistant to medial than lateral displacement. Our finding that lateral patellar displacement occurred at the lowest restraining force when the knee was flexed 20 degrees agrees with clinical experience of patellar instability.     

Patella resurfacing in posterior stabilised total knee arthroplasty: a follow-up study in 56 patients

Patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains controversial. This study evaluates the results of resurfacing and non-resurfacing of the patella. Fifty-six patients with osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee were enrolled in a prospective randomised clinical trial using a posterior-stabilised TKA. Evaluations were done preoperatively and after 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months. Disease specific (Knee Society Score or KSS) and functional (patella-related activities) outcomes were measured. Patient satisfaction and anterior knee pain questionnaires were completed. No patients were lost to follow-up. No significant differences were found between groups with regard to the clinical part of the Knee Society score (KSS) not even in obese patients, the ability of performing daily activities involving the patellofemoral joint, and patient satisfaction. Significant differences were found regarding the functional section of the KSS, passive flexion, anterior knee pain and patellar tilt and subluxation. In conclusion, the authors believe that, for the implant studied, patellar resurfacing can be indicated.     

The influence of patellar resurfacing on patellar kinetics and retropatellar contact characteristics

Background

Femoropatellar complications are one of the most common problems after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, the question of whether to resurface the patella remains controversial. Therefore, we evaluated the kinetics and the retropatellar contact characteristics of patella resurfacing with fixed and gliding surfaces.

Methods

Eight Thiel-embalmed cadaver knees were tested—first intact, then after TKA without patellar resurfacing, and finally with additional patellar resurfacing—while flexing the knee from 0° to 100°. We tested a fixed as well as a gliding patella surface. During the examination, quadriceps and hamstring forces were applied. The retropatellar pressure was determined with a special patella sensor, and the patellar kinetics were measured using an optical three-dimensional motion analysis system.

Results

Resurfacing the patella caused a significant increase in retropatellar pressure and a significant decrease in retropatellar contact area. Using a fixed patella, the retropatellar pressure nearly quadrupled in higher flexion compared to the native patella. Furthermore, the lateral movement of the patella increased after TKA, especially after additional patellar resurfacing.

Conclusions

Resurfacing the patella routinely is not advised. When osteoarthritis of the patella is found, the gliding patella should be preferred.     

Patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty

Technical errors in patellar resurfacing at the time of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are responsible for many of the complications that affect the patellofemoral joint. Instability, patellar fracture, and wear of metal-backed patellar implants are significantly affected by errors of patellar resurfacing. A review of 50 TKAs using a condylar prosthesis and a standardized technique for patellar resurfacing was performed to evaluate the accuracy of the technique. The patients were evaluated at a mean of 2.5 years (range, two to five years) after surgery. The Hospital for Special Surgery Knee Score improved from a preoperative mean of 56 to 92 at the last evaluation. The Hospital for Special Surgery Knee Scores were excellent in 92% and good in 8%. The Knee Society Knee Score improved from a preoperative mean of 28 for pain and 49 for function to a last evaluation mean of 96 for pain and 85 for function. None of the patients had symptoms referable to the patellofemoral joint. There were no patellar fractures, dislocations, or instances of implant loosening of the patella. Roentgenograms revealed nine asymmetrically resurfaced patellae and five tilted patellae. There were no patellar subluxations. Patellar thickness was maintained at the preoperative level of 21 mm. Joint-line height was elevated 1 mm. The patellar height was decreased 2 mm from the preoperative height. Using a standard technique, satisfactory clinical results can be achieved, but minor errors in resurfacing and alignment will still occur.     

The Outcome of Total Knee Arthroplasty With and Without Patellar Resurfacing up to 17 Years: A Report From the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry

BackgroundPatellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains a controversial issue after more than 4 decades of TKA. Despite a growing body of evidence from registry data, resurfacing is still based largely on a surgeon’s preference and training. The purpose of this study is to provide long-term outcomes for patellar resurfaced compared to when the patella is not resurfaced.MethodsData from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (1999-2017) were used for this study. The analysis included 570,735 primary TKAs undertaken for osteoarthritis. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 17-year cumulative percent revision rates were used to compare revision rates between 4 subgroups: minimally stabilized (MS) patellar resurfacing, posterior stabilized (PS) patellar resurfacing, MS unresurfaced, and PS unresurfaced patella. Additional analyses of the patellar implant type and a comparison of inlay and onlay patellar resurfacing were also performed.ResultsFor all primary TKA, procedures where the patella was not resurfaced have a higher rate of revision compared to procedures where the patella was resurfaced (HR, 1.31; confidence interval, 1.28-1.35; P < .001). Unresurfaced PS knees have the highest cumulative percent revision at 17 years (11.1%), followed by MS unresurfaced (8.8%), PS resurfaced (7.9%), and MS resurfaced (7.1%). Inlay patellar resurfacing has a higher rate of revision compared to onlay patellar resurfacing (HR, 1.27; confidence interval, 1.17-1.37; P < .001).ConclusionResurfacing the patella reduces the rate of revision for both MS and PS knees. MS knees with patellar resurfacing have the lowest rate of revision. Onlay patella designs are associated with a lower revision rate compared to inlay patella designs.     

Patellar clunk syndrome in total knee arthroplasty without patellar resurfacing

In a series of 647 total knee arthroplasties, the patella was not resurfaced if bony geometry of the patella was good enough to maintain good congruency of the patella undersurface to the femoral component and the patella was tracking normally at the femoral component groove at the time of surgery. Three hundred seventy-two total knee arthroplasties were done with a femoral component that had the same geometry as the original total condylar prosthesis. None of these knees resulted in patellar catching, whether the patella was resurfaced or not. Two hundred seventy-five total knee arthroplasties were done with a more contemporary femoral component with wider intercondylar space and shorter posterior extension of the intercondylar notch. Eleven of these 275 knees demonstrated catching of the patella at 60° to 90° of flexion when the knee was tested from flexion to extension during the surgery. All of these 11 knees did not have patellar resurfacing during surgery at first. Of these 11 knees with patellar catching noted during surgery, at first, patellar catching was eliminated with patellar resurfacing in 4 and by shaving of the superior pole of the patella in 7. None of the knees with the patella resurfacing in this series showed patellar catching.     

In vivo movement analysis of the patella using a three-dimensional computer model

We used three-dimensional movement analysis by computer modelling of knee flexion from 0 degrees to 50 degrees in 14 knees in 12 patients with recurrent patellar dislocation and in 15 knees in ten normal control subjects to compare the in vivo three-dimensional movement of the patella. Flexion, tilt and spin of the patella were described in terms of rotation angles from 0 degrees . The location of the patella and the tibial tubercle were evaluated using parameters expressed as percentage patellar shift and percentage tubercle shift. Patellar inclination to the femur was also measured and patellofemoral contact was qualitatively and quantitatively analysed. The patients had greater values of spin from 20 degrees to 50 degrees , while there were no statistically significant differences in flexion and tilt. The patients also had greater percentage patellar shift from 0 degrees to 50 degrees , percentage tubercle shift at 0 degrees and 10 degrees and patellar inclination from 0 degrees to 50 degrees with a smaller oval-shaped contact area from 20 degrees to 50 degrees moving downwards on the lateral facet. Patellar movement analysis using a three-dimensional computer model is useful to clearly demonstrate differences between patients with recurrent dislocation of the patella and normal control subjects.     

Patellar Fracture After Total Knee Arthroplasty With Retention: A Retrospective Analysis of 2954 Consecutive Cases

BackgroundTo the best of our knowledge, there have been no large case studies on patellar fracture after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with patella retention.MethodsFrom 2005 to 2019, 2954 consecutive TKAs with patella retention were retrospectively reviewed. The incidence of patellar fracture was confirmed. Perioperative demographic factors associated with patellar fracture were compared between the nonpatellar fracture control (randomly selected after age and sex matching) and patellar fracture patient groups. To confirm the prognosis of identified patellar fractures, Hospital for Special Surgery knee score, union rates, and complications after treatment were evaluated. Treatment outcomes were compared as per the treatment method, and fracture type was classified by shape.ResultsFor primary TKAs with patella retention, patellar fracture occurred in 32 of 2883 cases (incidence 1.11%). When comparing the preoperative demographic factors between the patellar fracture and control groups, there was a significant difference in knee flexion of the affected limb. Twenty-three cases were treated nonoperatively, and nine cases were treated operatively. Of the 32 patellar fractures, 28 had confirmed union, and the HSS score at the latest follow-up increased significantly from the preoperative score. The only complication noted after treatment was nonunion in three cases. We found no significant differences in treatment results as per the treatment method and fracture type.ConclusionPatellar fracture after TKA with retained patella is infrequent, with relatively improved clinicoradiological results over those of patellar fracture after TKA with resurfaced patella reported in the literature. The improved results did not differ as per the treatment method and fracture type.