Combination chemotherapy of paclitaxel, carboplatin and gemcitabine in patients who have received prior cisplatin-based chemotherapy

The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of combination chemotherapy with paclitaxel, carboplatin and gemcitabine in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma, who have received prior cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Eligible patients had pathologically proven measurable metastatic urothelial carcinoma. Between April 2005 and May 2009, 8 patients with a mean age of 7 0 years were treated every 3 weeks with paclitaxel (200 mg/m2 on day 1), carboplatin (AUC= 5/body on day 1) and gemcitabine (800 mg/m2 on day 1 and 8). A total of 4 0 (median 4) cycles were administered. None of the 8 patients achieved a complete response(CR), but 3 patients (37. 5%) achieved a partial response (PR) and 3 were stable with the disease(SD). The median overall survival time and the median progression-free survival time were 8. 0 and 4. 5 months, respectively. Grade 4 hematological toxicities included neutropenia in 6 cycles (15. 0%), thrombocytopenia in 8 cycles (20. 0%) and anemia in 11 cycles (27. 5%). Three of the 8 patients had febrile neutropenic episodes, and no toxic death was observed. Our results suggest that the combination chemotherapy of paclitaxel, carboplatin and gemcitabine was effective, and an acceptable treatment for patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma who have received prior cisplatin-based chemotherapy.     

A novel triplet regimen with paclitaxel, carboplatin and gemcitabine (PACCAGE) as induction chemotherapy for locally advanced unresectable non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

Phase II study of 3 cycles of triplet induction chemotherapy (response, toxicity) followed by radiotherapy in locally advanced non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). BACKGROUND: Patients with locally advanced inoperable non-small cell lung cancer are currently treated with concomitant or sequential chemotherapy and radiotherapy. However, the outcome of existing treatment modalities is unsatisfactory. Development of new strategies including more efficient systemic chemotherapy is warranted. OBJECTIVE: To study the antitumour activity and toxicity of a triplet combination of paclitaxel, carboplatin and gemcitabine as induction chemotherapy before radiotherapy, in locally advanced NSCLC and to evaluate time to progression and survival. METHODS: Three cycles of paclitaxel (175 mg/m(2) by 3h infusion on day 1), carboplatin (AUC 5mg/(mlmin) by IV bolus on day 1) and gemcitabine (1000 mg/m(2) by IV bolus on day 1 and 8) were administered every 3 weeks in reasonably fit patients. Fractionated radiotherapy with curative intent was initiated 4 weeks after the last chemotherapy administration. Toxicity was assessed weekly during cycle 1 and on day 1 and 8 in cycles 2 and 3. Response evaluation was performed at the end of cycle 3. RESULTS: Forty-eight patients (20 stage IIIA and 28 stage IIIB) received a total of 134 cycles of chemotherapy. Forty-two patients received the intended 3 cycles. Thirty patients obtained an objective response (1 complete and 29 partial response) or 62.5% on the intent to treat analysis (95% confidence interval: 49-76%). None of the responders became eligible for surgery. The median time to progression and survival for all patients was 10.1 and 15.7 month, respectively. A significant difference was observed in survival parameters between stage IIIA and stage IIIB patients. Haematological toxicity grade 3/4, mainly neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, was most prominent on day 15 of the treatment cycles. Haematological support by means of recombinant erythropoietin, red blood cell or platelet transfusion, filgrastim administration or a combination was needed in 21 patients. None of the patients discontinued chemotherapy because of haematotoxicity. Grade 3/4 non-haematological toxicity leading to chemotherapy withdrawal occurred early during induction (2 and 1 in cycles 1 and 2, respectively). CONCLUSION: Three cycles of the novel triplet combination of paclitaxel, carboplatin and gemcitabine (PACCAGE) is an active and feasible induction regimen for patients with locally advanced inoperable NSCLC. Neutropenia and to a lesser extent thrombocytopenia represent the main haematological toxicity. Whether this triplet regimen can improve outcome when compared to specific cisplatin doublet regimens should be evaluated in a phase III study.     

Sequential combination chemotherapy in patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma: carboplatin and gemcitabine followed by paclitaxel.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this Phase II study was to evaluate the concept of sequential chemotherapy in the treatment of patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) by the administration of carboplatin plus gemcitabine followed by of paclitaxel. METHODS: Patients with Stage IIIB (pleural effusion) or Stage IV NSCLC and a Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) performance status (PS) of 0--2 were eligible. Therapy consisted of three cycles of carboplatin (area under the concentration-time curve = 5.5 mg/mL per minute) on Day 1 and gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) on Days 1 and 8 every 21 days followed by three cycles of paclitaxel 225 mg/m(2) every 21 days. RESULTS: Of the 37 eligible patients, 81% had Stage IV disease, and 27% had a PS of 2; all were assessable for survival and toxicity; 32 patients were assessable for response. After treatment with carboplatin plus gemcitabine, there were no complete responses (CRs) and eight partial responses (PRs) (response rate [RR], 25%; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 11--43%). The best overall response was two CRs and eight PRs (RR, 31%; 95% CI, 16--50%). The median survival time was 9.5 months, the 1-year survival rate was 36% (95% CI, 26--44%), the 2-year survival rate was 11% (95% CI, 3--25%), and the median time to disease progression was 4.9 months. The median survivals were 11.2 months for patients with a PS of 0--1 and 6.4 months for patients with a PS of 2. Noncumulative, reversible thrombocytopenia was the principal toxicity with carboplatin/gemcitabine therapy. Paclitaxel therapy was well tolerated, and moderate (Grade 3) neutropenia was the primary toxic effect. One cardiac death occurred, possibly related to paclitaxel. CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first to evaluate planned sequential chemotherapy in patients with NSCLC. Carboplatin plus gemcitabine followed by paclitaxel was well tolerated and resulted in promising survival in this patient population. This pilot experience forms the basis for an ongoing SWOG trial. Cancer 2001;92:146-52. Published 2001 American Cancer Society.     

Second-line chemotherapy with irinotecan and vinorelbine in stage IIIB and IV non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase II study

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerance of combined irinotecan and vinorelbine in previously treated patients with stage IIIB and IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Thirty-three patients with NSCLC (7 stage IIIB and 26 stage IV) were enrolled. All had been previously treated with cisplatin, paclitaxel, and gemcitabine as first-line chemotherapy. In addition, 24 patients had received radiotherapy. Irinotecan (300 mg/m(2)) was administered on day 1 and vinorelbine (30 mg/m(2)) on days 1 and 14, every 4 weeks. Partial response was achieved in 3 patients (9%; 95% CI: 2-24%), stable disease (SD) in 13 (39%; 95% CI: 23-58%), whereas 17 patients progressed (51%; 95% CI: 33-69%). Median event-free survival was 10 weeks and median overall survival was 25 weeks. Three patients were event free at the end of the study with a follow-up of 40, 73, and 75 weeks. Toxicity was mild, with leukopenia grade III-IV in 8.6% of cycles. No episodes of diarrhea III-IV were observed. Three patients died early after administration of this combination, one of them in the context of severe leukopenia and thrombocytopenia. Approximately 50% of patients treated with CPT-11 and vinorelbine in combination show partial response or stable disease with minimal toxicity.     

Gemcitabine and carboplatin in patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: a prospective phase II study

PURPOSE: The primary objective of this phase II study was to determine the tumor remission rates in previously untreated patients with advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (stage IIIB and IV), after treatment with gemcitabine plus carboplatin. Secondary objectives of this study were to determine toxicity, median survival and progression free survival in the same patient population treated with gemcitabine plus carboplatin. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Chemonaive patients with histological or cytological diagnosis of stage IIIB or IV NSCLC and Karnofsky performance status >/=60 received gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) over 30 min on days 1 and 8 and carboplatin AUC 5.0 over 30 min on day 1 after the gemcitabine infusion. Treatment cycles were repeated every 21 days for a maximum of six cycles, or until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred. RESULTS: Of the 60 patients qualified for efficacy analysis, five achieved complete remissions, 15 partial remissions and 33 had stable disease, for an overall objective response rate (CR+PR) of 33.3% (95% CI, 21.7-46.7%). Four patients had progressive disease. The predominant toxicity was hematologic, with grade 3/4 leucopoenia being most common (35% patients). The median duration of response was 5 months, median time to progression was 6 months and median survival was 9 months with 80% of patients censored. CONCLUSION: Gemcitabine plus carboplatin is an effective and well tolerated treatment for advanced NSCLC.     

Weekly chemotherapy with carboplatin,docetaxel and irinotecan in advanced non-small-cell-lung cancer: a phase II study

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of carboplatin, docetaxel plus irinotecan given weekly to patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). 50 patients with previously untreated NSCLC (stage IIIB 10; stage IV 40; 44% squamous cell carcinoma; median Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) status 1) received intravenous (i.v.) carboplatin area under the curve (AUC) 2, docetaxel 20 mg/m(2) and irinotecan 60 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8 and 15, repeated every 5 weeks. Prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) 150 ug/m(2) was given from days 3 to 6 and 10 to 13. Response was evaluated every two cycles. Four complete responses (8%) and 24 (48%) partial responses were observed, giving an overall intent-to-treat response rate of 56%. 8 patients (16%) achieved stable disease and 14 (28%) progressed. The median time to progression (TTP) was 9.6 months (range 2.5-21.8 months), median survival was 14.8 months (range 0.3-27+ months) and actuarial 1-year survival time was 55%. Grade 3/4 anaemia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 18 and 22% of patients, respectively; 13 patients (26%) developed grade 3/4 neutropenia and 7 (14%) had neutropenic fever that required hospitalisation, but was successfully treated with antibiotics and G-CSF support. One patient developed a severe allergy during docetaxel administration and was withdrawn. Other grade 3/4 adverse events included diarrhoea (n=14; 3 required hospitalisation), nausea/vomiting (n=9), neurotoxicity (n=5) and fatigue (n=5). 6 patients required a dose reduction. This combination of i.v. carboplatin AUC 2, docetaxel 20 mg/m(2) and irinotecan 60 mg/m(2) given weekly is highly effective in the treatment of chemotherapy-na?ve advanced NSCLC. Toxicity was moderate, but manageable.     

A dose and schedule finding study of gemcitabine and etoposide in patients with progressive non-small cell lung cancer after platinum containing chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Combination chemotherapy improves survival in patients with disseminated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Gemcitabine is active against NSCLC and etoposide has an additive effect in vitro. We describe a dose finding study for the combination of these drugs. PATIENTS AND METHODS: NSCLC patients progressive after chemotherapy received gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2 days 1, 8, 15) and one of five etoposide schedules in doses ranging from 60 to 100 mg/m2 per day administered on days 1-3 (schedules 1-2) or 8-10 (schedules 3-5). RESULTS: 23 patients (median age 59 years) were entered. Number of patients and cycles evaluable for toxicity was 22 and 75. Non-hematological toxicity was mild. In cycle 1 leukocytopenia grade III/IV was observed in 33 and 56% of the patients treated with etoposide 60 and 80 mg/m2 days 1-3 and in 50% treated with etoposide 60 and 80 mg/m2 days 8-10. During cycle 1 thrombocytopenia grade III/IV was observed in 0, 33, 0 and 33% of these patients, respectively. Both patients treated at etoposide 100 mg/m2 days 8-10 experienced febrile leukocytopenia. During cycle 1 single doses of gemcitabine were administered as planned more frequently in patients receiving etoposide 80 mg/m2 per day on days 8-10 compared to etoposide days 1-3 (83 versus 70%). Postponement of combination gemcitabine and etoposide was not necessary. The overall response rate was 21% (95% confidence interval 3-39%) with a median duration of 7.5 + months in this dose finding study. CONCLUSIONS: Combined gemcitabine etoposide is feasible in patients with progressive NSCLC. The optimal combination was gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 per day on days 1, 8 and 15 and etoposide 80 mg/m2 per day on days 8-10 of each 28-day cycle. The response rate of 21% warrants further investigation in patients with advanced NSCLC.     

A phase II study of irinotecan (CPT-11) and carboplatin in patients with limited disease small cell lung cancer (SCLC)

PURPOSE: The aim of this phase II trial was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a combination chemotherapy containing irinotecan (CPT-11) and carboplatin as first-line treatment of patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: From December 2002 to May 2004 61 patients with limited disease (IASLC classification) were enrolled who were not suitable for concurrent chemo-radiotherapy. Eighteen of the 61 patients (29.5%) had malignant pleural or pericardial effusion and 4 patients (6.6%) had involved supra- or infraclavicular lymph nodes. Patients received irinotecan 50mg/m(2) on days 1, 8 and 15 and carboplatin AUC 5 on day 1, every 4 weeks. RESULTS: A total of 233 chemotherapy cycles were administered. The median number of cycles per patient was 4. The overall response rate to chemotherapy on an intention-to-treat basis was 64%. The median overall survival was 13.8 months, the median disease-free survival 8.0 months, the 1-year survival rate 53.5%, and the 2-year survival rate 17.9%. Haematological and non-hematogical toxicities were low (CTC-grade 3 neutropenia 14.8%, grade 3 thrombocytopenia 5.2%, grade 3/4 anemia 5.1%, grade 3 nausea/vomiting 5.1%, grade 3 diarrhea 3.6%, grade 3 alopecia 3.6% of pts). CONCLUSION: The results suggest that the combination of irinotecan (CPT-11) and carboplatin is active and well tolerable in patients with limited disease SCLC who were not suitable for concurrent chemotherapy.     

Combination second-line chemotherapy with gemcitabine and docetaxel for recurrent non-small-cell lung cancer after platinum-containing chemotherapy: a phase I/II trial

PURPOSE: In a randomized trial, docetaxel monotherapy yielded longer survival than the best supportive care in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy, and combination chemotherapy regimens containing docetaxel have been assessed to enhance the efficacy of second-line chemotherapy. We conducted a phase I/II trial of gemcitabine and docetaxel in patients with recurrent NSCLC after platinum-based chemotherapy and with an ECOG performance status (PS) of 0 or 1. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Docetaxel administration was fixed at a dosage of 60 mg/m(2) on day 8, and gemcitabine was administered on days 1 and 8. The starting dose level of gemcitabine was 800 mg/m(2) (level 0), and the subsequent dose level of gemcitabine was 1000 mg/m(2) (level +1). Treatment was repeated every 3 weeks. RESULTS: In the phase I study, 13 patients were enrolled, and in the phase II study, 29 patients were enrolled. Neutropenic fever and omission of treatment on day 8 due to leukopenia (leukocyte count less than 3000/mm(3)) were dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs). Three of six patients experienced DLTs at level +1, which was the maximum tolerated dose. Gemcitabine 800 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 plus docetaxel 60 mg/m(2) on day 8 (level 0) was recommended for the phase II study. An objective response was observed in 8 (28%) of the 29 patients. The median time to disease progression was 4.2 months (95% CI 0.9-7.7 months). The median survival time was 11.1 months (95% CI 9.9-12.4 months), and the 1-year survival rate was 41%. The most common toxicity, though mild, was hematologic, and consisted of grade 4 neutropenia (18%), grade 3 febrile neutropenia (11%), and grade 3 thrombocytopenia (11%). There were no toxic deaths. Grade 3 non-hematologic toxicities included nausea (4%) and rash (4%). CONCLUSIONS: The combination chemotherapy of gemcitabine and docetaxel is active and well tolerated in patients with recurrent NSCLC after platinum-based chemotherapy and with a good PS.     

Phase II trial of a 2-h infusion of gemcitabine plus carboplatin as first-line chemotherapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combination of using gemcitabine as a rate infusion of 10 mg/m² per min with carboplatin in front-line chemonaive patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients and methods: Fifty-four chemonaive patients with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC have been included, 44 males and 10 females, with a median age 63 years (range 19–75). Thirty-two (59%) patients had adenocarcinoma, 13 (24%) squamous cell, 1 (2%) large cell carcinoma and 8 (15%) others. Eight (15%) had stage IIIB and 46 (85%) stage IV. Treatment was consisted of 1,200 mg/m² gemcitabine given as a 2-h continuous infusion (10 mg/m² per min) on days 1 and 8 of each cycle an AUC 5 carboplatin as on day 1, repeating each cycle for every 21 days. A total of 223 chemotherapy cycles were administered, with a median of four cycles per patient (range 1–6), and 15 (28%) patients received all six cycles. Results: Of the 54 patients enrolled, all were evaluated for toxicity and 51 assessed for response. The overall response rate was 41% (95% confidence interval, 28–57%) with complete and partial responses of 4 and 37%, respectively. The median time to disease progression was 5.0 months (95% CI, 3.7–6.3 months), and median overall survival time was 11.5 months (95% CI, 9.9–13.1 months). One-year survival was 42%. The main grade 3–4 toxicity (according to the WHO scale) consisted of neutropenia (56%) and thrombocytopenia (57%). Patients were required platelet transfusion in 27 cycles (12%) and hematopoietic growth factors support care in 56 (25%) cycles. No bleeding episodes were recorded. Grade 3 nausea/vomiting occurred in 6% and grade 1–2 skin rash occurred in 43%. Conclusions: Prolonged gemcitabine infusion combined with carboplatin is manageable and tolerated, and its efficacy is similar to that of other chemotherapeutic schemes used for NSCLC treatment.     

Phase II trial of carboplatin and paclitaxel in non-small cell lung cancer patients previously treated with chemotherapy

The purpose of this phase II trial was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of carboplatin plus paclitaxel in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) previously treated with chemotherapy. Patients with a performance status (PS) of 0 or 1 who had received one or two previous chemotherapy regimens for advanced NSCLC were eligible. Paclitaxel 200mg/m(2) was infused over 3h and followed by carboplatin (area under the curve 6) infusion over 1h, once every 3 weeks. Thirty patients were enrolled. A complete response was observed in 1 patient and a partial response in 10 patients, for an overall response rate of 36.7%. The median time to progression was 5.3 months. The median survival time was 9.9 months, and the 1-year survival rate was 47%. Hematological toxicity in the form of grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred in 54%, but grade 3 febrile neutropenia developed in only 3%. Non-hematological grade 3 toxicities were less frequent. There were no treatment-related deaths. The combination of carboplatin plus paclitaxel is an active and well-tolerated regimen for the treatment of NSCLC patients who have previously been treated with chemotherapy and have a good PS.     

Combination of carboplatin and gemcitabine is a safe and feasible regimen in adjuvant therapy for stage II and IIIA NSCLC

BACKGROUND: Recently, several randomized trials have shown that postoperative adjuvant treatment improves survival among patients with completely resected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Platinum-based chemotherapy has been reported to be effective for patients with postoperative stage II to IIIA. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In the present study, 5 patients with completely resected stage IIB and IIIA received carboplatin AUC 4 on day 1 and gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks for six cycles as adjuvant chemotherapy. RESULTS: No early or toxic deaths were observed. All patients were administered 6 cycles completely and safely. Three patients had grade 3 neutropenia and three had grade 2 thrombocytopenia. One patient had grade 3 neutropenia on day 8 in the 2nd and 3rd cycle, and the medications were postponed for a week. Non-hematological toxicity including alopecia and neuropathy were not found. CONCLUSION: In the present study, the combination of carboplatin and gemcitabine has been a safe and feasible regimen in adjuvant therapy for stage II and IIIA NSCLC.     

A phase I/II trial of induction chemotherapy with carboplatin and gemcitabine followed by concurrent vinorelbine and paclitaxel with chest radiation in patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer

PURPOSE: We designed a phase I/II trial in order to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of induction carboplatin and gemcitabine and the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of subsequent chemoradiotherapy with weekly vinorelbine and paclitaxel in patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients had pathologically confirmed N2-N3 stage NSCLC, adequate end-organ function, and ECOG performance status 0-2. Carboplatin was administered at an AUC of 5 on day 1 and gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8, every 21 days, for two cycles, followed by weekly vinorelbine 10-15 mg/m2 and paclitaxel 50 mg/m2 and conventional chest radiotherapy up to 66 Gy. Patients with resectable disease underwent thoracotomy after 40-45 Gy. RESULTS: Thirty-nine eligible patients were enrolled; 17 had stage IIIB NSCLC. Grade 3 esophagitis developed in 4/5 patients on the second dose level of chemoradiotherapy (i.e. vinorelbine 15 mg/m2) and was considered dose-limiting. Of 34 patients treated at the maximum tolerated dose (i.e. vinorelbine 10 mg/m2), 2 patients (6%) had pneumonitis >grade 2 and 3 (9%), esophagitis >grade 2. Induction chemotherapy was well tolerated with only one patient developing >grade 2 non-hematologic toxicity (nausea). Forty-one percent of patients had an objective response after induction chemotherapy and 51% after chemoradiotherapy. Nineteen patients, 16 of whom had stage IIIA, underwent surgical resection. The pathologic complete response rate was 16% (42% in the mediastinal lymph nodes). With a median follow-up of 31 months, the 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 23 and 34%, respectively, and the median OS was 25 months. CONCLUSIONS: We identified a well-tolerated and active chemoradiotherapy regimen. Survival results are promising and the addition of a biologic agent to this regimen is of interest.     

A dose-escalation study of irinotecan (CPT-11) in combination with gemcitabine in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer previously treated with a cisplatin-based front line chemotherapy

PURPOSE: CPT-11 and gemcitabine are both active agents against non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We conducted a phase I study to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of their combination in patients with previously treated advanced NSCLC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-seven patients with histologically confirmed NSCLC, who had failed cisplatin-based front-line chemotherapy, were enrolled. The patients' median age was 56 years, 24 were male and 22 had a performance status (WHO) 0-1. Gemcitabine was administered on days 1 and 8, as a 30-minute i.v. infusion, at escalated doses ranging from 900 to 1200 mg/m2. CPT-11 was given over a 60-minute i.v. infusion on day 8 at escalated doses ranging from 200 to 350 mg/m2, following gemcitabine administration. The treatment was repeated every three weeks. RESULTS: The MTD was exceeded at dose-level 7 with CPT-11 350 mg/m2 and gemcitabine 1200 mg/m2, where all three enrolled patients presented DLTs (one patient grade 4 thrombocytopenia, one grade 3 diarrhea and one grade 3 asthenia). The recommended doses for future phase II studies are CPT-11 300 mg/m2 on day 8 and gemcitabine 1200 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8. A total of 107 treatment cycles were administered. Grade 3/4 neutropenia was observed in 13 (13%) cycles, febrile neutropenia in 3 (3%) and grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia in 2 (2%). Grade 2/3 diarrhea was seen in 6 (6%) cycles, grade 2/3 nausea and vomiting in 13 (13%) and grade 2/3 asthenia in 8 (8%). Other toxicities were mild. Among 23 patients evaluable for response, PR was achieved in one (4.5%), SD in 12 (52.5%) and PD in 10 (43%). CONCLUSION: The results of this phase I study clearly demonstrate that gemcitabine and CPT-11 can be efficiently combined in a low-toxicity regimen with doses equal or near monotherapy levels. Further studies are needed to evaluate the efficacy of this combination in both chemotherapy-naive and pre-treated patients with advanced NSCLC.     

A phase II study of days 1 and 8 combination of docetaxel plus gemcitabine for the second-line treatment of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer and good performance status

OBJECTIVE: We conducted a phase II trial to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of a combination consisting of second-line docetaxel and gemcitabine in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligibility criteria: histologically confirmed advanced NSCLC with progressive disease to platinum-based chemotherapy, ECOG performance status (PS) 0 or 1, and adequate kidney, liver and bone marrow function. Treatment consisted of docetaxel 36 mg/m(2) i.v. over 60 min followed by gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) i.v. over 30 min on days 1 and 8 of each 3-week cycle for a planned six cycles or unacceptable toxicity. RESULTS: Of the 52 patients enrolled, 50 were evaluable for response and toxicity. The mean age was 59 years (range 42-79), 46 male and 4 female. Histology subtypes were: adenocarcinoma 26 patients, bronchioloalveolar 1 patient, large cell carcinoma 5 patients, and squamous cell carcinoma 18 patients. Thirty-eight patients had ECOG PS 1 and 12 patients had PS 0. The median number of cycles administered was four (range 2-6). The overall response rate was 28%. The median follow-up was 9 months (range 5-34 months). The median survival time (MST) was 8.2 months (95% CI, 4-12%), and the 1-year survival was 25%. The median progression-free survival was 4.4 months (95% CI, 2-6%). In the Cox regression model, survival was only significantly affected by the PS. The median survival in patients with PS 0 was 17.8 months (95% CI, 18.8-21.8%) compared with a median survival for patients with PS 1 of 6.1 months (95% CI, 4.1-8.2%) (P=0.0057). Toxicity: three patients had grade 3 anemia, three patients had grade 3 thrombocytopenia, four patients had grade 3 neutropenia and only one patient developed grade 4 febrile neutropenia. Non-hematologic toxicity was also mild; the most frequent was asthenia, with grade 3 in eight patients (16%), and one patient with grade 4. CONCLUSION: This regimen of docetaxel in combination with gemcitabine in advanced second-line NSCLC is an active and safe regimen.     

Chemotherapy for brain metastases in small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE: Brain metastasis occurs commonly in patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). Herein, we report the efficacy of irinotecan and carboplatin in the treatment of brain metastases from SCLC. In addition, we review the existing data on chemotherapy for brain metastases in SCLC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eighty patients with metastatic or relapsed SCLC were enrolled in a phase II trial of irinotecan and carboplatin. Patients naive to chemotherapy were treated with irinotecan 200 mg/m2 and carboplatin AUC of 5, and patients previously treated with chemotherapy received irinotecan 150 mg/m2 and carboplatin AUC of 5, every 21 days for 6 cycles. RESULTS: Among the 80 patients, 15 (19%) presented with brain metastases. An analysis of 14 assessable patients with brain metastases revealed an overall response rate of 65% after 2 cycles of chemotherapy and a median survival of 6 months (range, 1-24 months). Upon review of the literature, 8 studies were identified as having > 10 patients who received chemotherapy for brain metastases from SCLC. Based on these studies, the response rate of brain metastases from SCLC to a variety of chemotherapy and median survival of patients ranged from 22% to 85% and 3 months to 9 months, respectively. CONCLUSION: Chemotherapy, including the regimen of irinotecan and carboplatin, is an effective treatment for SCLC brain metastases.     

Clinical effect of irinotecan in advanced and metastatic breast cancer patients previously treated with doxorubicin- and docetaxel-containing regimens

BACKGROUND: Previous phase II trials in Japan suggested that irinotecan was a promising agent for advanced or metastatic breast cancer pretreated with anthracycline. However, irinotecan has not yet been evaluated in the salvage setting for breast cancer pretreated with both anthracycline and taxane, which are two active agents for breast cancer. METHODS: The efficacy and safety of irinotecan were retrospectively evaluated in patients with breast cancer who had previously been treated with both doxorubicin and docetaxel. From 1996 to 1999, irinotecan was administered to 20 patients, all with a performance status of <2. Irinotecan treatment was repeated in approximately 6 week cycles consisting of the administration of irinotecan once weekly for 4 weeks followed by a 2 week rest. The median dose of irinotecan administered was 100 mg/m(2) weekly. The median number of irinotecan cycles given was 1 (range: 1-8 cycles). The median total dose was 388 mg/m(2) (range: 50-2400 mg/m(2)). RESULTS: Performance status declined to >3 after treatment with irinotecan in four patients. Two patients had grade 3 leukopenia; three had grade 3 anemia and one had a creatinine elevation of grade 4. The objective response rate for all patients was 5.0% (95% CI: 0-15.5%). The median time to progression and overall survival were 35 days (range: 17-285 days) and 124 days (range: 17-667 days), respectively, since the start of the administration of irinotecan. CONCLUSIONS: Salvage chemotherapy with irinotecan may be inactive against advanced and metastatic breast cancer pretreated with doxorubicin and docetaxel. We will evaluate irinotecan for advanced and metastatic breast cancer patients as first- or second-line chemotherapy combined with anthracycline or taxane.     

Phase II study of irinotecan and docetaxel in patients with previously treated non-small cell lung cancer: an Alpe-Adria Thoracic Oncology Multidisciplinary group study (ATOM 007)

This study was designed to evaluate the activity and tolerability of irinotecan and docetaxel in patients with previously treated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Eligibility included recurrent or progressive NSCLC, previous chemotherapy, age > or = 18 years, ECOG PS < or = 2. Treatment consisted of irinotecan (160 mg/m2 i.v.), followed by docetaxel (65 mg/m2 i.v.) on day 1 of a 21-day cycle, for a maximum of 6 cycles. Forty patients were enrolled. Median age was 60 years and median ECOG PS was 1. All patients were evaluable for toxicity and 31 (78%) were evaluable for response. A total of 125 cycles was administered (median, 3; range, 1-6). Most common grade 3-4 toxicities were neutropenia (62%), neutropenic fever (22%), and diarrhea (32%). Response rate was 10%; a further 40% of patients achieved stable disease. All responses were observed in patients with ECOG PS < or = 1, age <70 years, and who had received only one prior chemotherapy regimen. Median time to progression was 2.8 months and median survival was 7.4 months. Because of significant toxicity and limited activity, further investigation of irinotecan plus docetaxel in second line NSCLC is not recommended.     

Phase II study of cisplatin-combined schedules as second-line chemotherapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of cisplatin- (CDDP) combined chemotherapy in non-cisplatin pretreated patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The second cytotoxic drug administered was either etoposide or gemcitabine. First-line treatment was based on paclitaxel combined with either carboplatin or vinorelbine. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy-eight patients with histologically- or cytologically- confirmed NSCLC, having failed front-line treatment, were enrolled. All patients received 80 mg/m2 of cisplatin as second-line treatment, on day 1, repeated every 3 weeks; in 48 patients the second agent was etoposide (120 mg/m2) on days 1, 2 and 3, repeated every 3 weeks and in 30 patients 1 g/m2 of gemcitabine on day 1, repeated every 3 weeks. RESULTS: All patients were evaluable for response and toxicity. No complete responses were observed. Thirteen (16.67%) patients achieved partial response, 42 (53.85%) stable disease and 23 (29.49%) had disease progression. The median duration of response was 4 months (range 2-8+ months), median time to tumor progression (TTP) 5 months (range 2-9 months) and median survival time after starting second-line chemotherapy, 6 months (range 2-9+ months). Toxicity was acceptable: 9 patients presented with nephrotoxicity (11.54%) and 13 (16.67%) with grade 3-4 neutropenia. CONCLUSION: The cisplatin combination as second-line treatment in patients with NSCLC exhibited a notable degree of activity and tumor growth control was evidenced by the 16.67% partial response and 53.85% disease stability.