Patients’ perceptions of safety if interpersonal continuity of care were to be disrupted

Objective  To determine if patients vary in perceptions of safety if interpersonal continuity were to be disrupted. If so, which characteristics are associated with feeling unsafe? Background  The extent to which patients’ preference for continuity with a personal physician is due to perceptions of safety is unclear. Design  Observational study (Wisconsin Longitudinal Study Graduate and Sibling Survey). Setting and participants  A total of 6827 respondents (most aged 63–66 years) who completed the 2003–06 survey round. Main variables studied  Age, gender, marital status, education, health insurance type, illnesses, medications, length of relationship with provider and place, personality type, decision‐making preference and trust in physician deliberation. Main outcome measures  Safety perception when visiting another doctor or clinic if own doctor were not available. Results  Twelve percent of respondents felt unsafe. After adjustment, as compared to those who felt safe, those who felt unsafe were more likely to be women (Odds ratio = 1.65, 95% confidence interval = 1.35–2.01), have more chronic conditions (1.27, 1.08–1.50) and have a longer relationship with a usual provider: 5–9 years (1.53, 1.11–2.10) 10–14 years (1.41, 1.02–1.95) and 15 or more years (1.62, 1.20–2.17) compared to 0–4 years. Those who preferred active participation in decision making and had trust in their physician were less likely to feel safe (1.63, 1.10–2.41). Conclusions  Certain older adults perceive being unsafe if not seeing their usual physician. Further research should investigate reasons for perceptions of safety if continuity were disrupted and any implications for care.     

Social work‐generated evidence in traumatic brain injury from 1975 to 2014: A systematic scoping review

The International Network for Social Workers in Acquired Brain Injury (INSWABI) commissioned a systematic scoping review to ascertain the social work‐generated evidence base on people with traumatic brain injury (TBI) of working age. The review aimed to identify the output, impact and quality of publications authored by social workers on this topic. Study quality was evaluated through assessment frameworks drawn from the United Kingdom National Service Framework for Long‐Term Conditions. In the 40‐year period from 1975 to 2014, 115 items were published that met the search criteria (intervention studies, n = 10; observational studies, n = 52; literature reviews, n = 6; expert opinion or policy analysis, n = 39; and others, n = 8). The publications could be grouped into five major fields of practice: families, social inclusion, military, inequalities and psychological adjustment. There was a significant increase in the number of publications over each decade. Impact was demonstrated in that the great majority of publications had been cited at least once (80.6%, 103/115). Articles published in rehabilitation journals were cited significantly more often than articles published in social work journals. A significant improvement in publication quality was observed across the four decades, with the majority of studies in the last decade rated as high quality.     

Certification of occupational diseases as common diseases in a primary health care setting

BACKGROUND: It is often difficult to discern whether a disease is an occupational or common disease, especially in a primary care setting. METHODS: From a randomly selected sample of 322 workers attending a Primary Health Care Center, 207 workers (response rate of 64.3%) agreed to participate. An occupational questionnaire was administered. General practitioners provided medical records for each worker. Medical records and occupational questionnaires were independently reviewed by three professionals. They assessed whether a relationship between disease and working conditions was probable or improbable. RESULTS: Thirty-three of the 207 cases (15.9%) were considered probably related to working conditions according to the expert's opinion. The most frequent were musculoskeletal diseases (20 cases). Of the 207 workers, 74 (35.7%) judged that their diseases could be related to their working conditions. CONCLUSIONS: A significant proportion of diseases attended in primary care setting was not recognized as occupational, and they were hence not reflected in official statistics.     

A study of the attitudes and perceived barriers to undertaking clinical governance activities of dietitians in a Welsh National Health Service trust

Background  Previous studies of National Health Service (NHS) employees have identified barriers to undertaking clinical governance activities. Little of this research has investigated dietitians; however, where dietitians were included, generally positive attitudes towards research and evidence-based practice were reported alongside the identified barriers.
Methods  A quantitative, whole population census was undertaken via a questionnaire distributed to 54 dietitians employed by Gwent Healthcare NHS Trust.
Results  Dietitians reported positive attitudes towards clinical governance; however, barriers to undertaking clinical governance activities were identified. The main barriers included lack of time, inadequate funding, the view that direct patient care should always be prioritised over clinical governance activities and inadequate research and critical evaluation skills.
Conclusions  Findings were similar to those reported in previous studies of NHS staff. Where comparison was possible, all of the barriers identified were reported at lower levels than in previous studies. As the study was purely quantitative in nature, no understanding was gained regarding the nature of identified barriers or what factors influenced the dietitians' attitudes and perceptions. For further in-depth analysis of these factors, a qualitative study is recommended. As the study comprised a whole population census, the findings cannot be generalized to the dietetic profession as a whole, or to other staff groups within or outside of the study Trust.     

Occupational therapists report a low level of knowledge,skill and involvement in evidence‐based practice

This study was conducted to collect information about Australian occupational therapists’ involvement in evidence‐based practice. The study aimed to document: (i) respondents’ level of knowledge and skills; (ii) their level of participation in continuing education; and (iii) perceived barriers to evidence‐based practice. A purposive sample of 85 occupational therapists was invited to complete a questionnaire prior to attending an introductory workshop on evidence‐based practice. Sixty‐seven questionnaires were returned and analysed (78.8% response rate). Half of the respondents rated their level of knowledge and skills required for evidence‐based practice as low (conducting database searches = 50.7%; critically appraising literature = 53.0%). The majority of respondents (79.1%) reported a low level of knowledge about electronic databases. Few respondents had attended education sessions on evidence‐based practice (15.0%). The six most commonly reported barriers to adopting evidence‐based practice were lack of time, a large caseload, limited searching skills, limited appraisal skills, difficulty accessing journals and a perceived lack of evidence to support occupational therapy intervention. The majority of occupational therapists in this sample were entering the first phase of continuing professional development in relation to evidence‐based practice.     

Research use and support needs, and research activity in social care: a cross-sectional survey in two councils with social services responsibilities in the UK

The purpose of this study was to investigate the level of research activity, research use, research interests and research skills in the social care workforce in two UK councils with social service responsibilities (CSSRs). A cross-sectional survey was conducted of the social care workforce in two CSSRs (n = 1512) in 2005. The sample was identified in partnership with the councils, and included employees with professional qualifications (social workers and occupational therapists); staff who have a role to assess, plan and monitor care; service managers; commissioners of services; and those involved with social care policy, information management and training. The survey achieved a response rate of 24% (n = 368). The Internet was reported as an effective source of research information; conversely, research-based guidelines were reported to have a low impact on practice. Significant differences were found in research use, by work location, and postgraduate training. Most respondents saw research as useful for practice (69%), and wanted to collaborate in research (68%), but only 11% were planning to do research within the next 12 months. Having a master's degree was associated with a greater desire to lead or collaborate in research. A range of research training needs, and the preferred modes of delivery were identified. Support to increase research activity includes protected time and mentorship. The study concludes that a range of mechanisms to make research available for the social care workforce needs to be in place to support evidence-informed practice. Continual professional development to a postgraduate level supports the use and production of evidence in the social care workforce, and promotes the development of a research culture. The term research is used to include service user consultations, needs assessment and service evaluation. The findings highlight a relatively large body of the social care workforce willing to collaborate and conduct research. Councils and research support systems need to be developed to utilise this relatively untapped potential.