Nonoperative management for patients with grade IV blunt hepatic trauma

Introduction

The treatment of complex liver injuries remains a challenge. Nonoperative treatment for such injuries is increasingly being adopted as the initial management strategy. We reviewed our experience, at a University teaching hospital, in the nonoperative management of grade IV liver injuries with the intent to evaluate failure rates; need for angioembolization and blood transfusions; and in-hospital mortality and complications.

Methods

This is a retrospective analysis conducted at a single large trauma centre in Brazil. All consecutive, hemodynamically stable, blunt trauma patients with grade IV hepatic injury, between 1996 and 2011, were analyzed. Demographics and baseline characteristics were recorded. Failure of nonoperative management was defined by the need for surgical intervention. Need for angioembolization and transfusions, in-hospital death, and complications were also assessed

Results

Eighteen patients with grade IV hepatic injury treated nonoperatively during the study period were included. The nonoperative treatment failed in only one patient (5.5%) who had refractory abdominal pain. However, no missed injuries and/or worsening of bleeding were observed during the operation. None of the patients died nor need angioembolization. No complications directly related to the liver were observed. Unrelated complications to the liver occurred in three patients (16.7%); one patient developed a tracheal stenosis (secondary to tracheal intubation); one had pleural effusion; and one developed an abscess in the pleural cavity. The hospital length of stay was on average 11.56 days.

Conclusions

In our experience, nonoperative management of grade IV liver injury for stable blunt trauma patients is associated with high success rates without significant complications.

     

Lessons learned from isolated blunt major pancreatic injury: Surgical experience in one trauma centre

IntroductionThe aim of this study was to present our surgical experience of isolated blunt major pancreatic injury (IBMPI), and to compare its characteristic outcomes with that of multi-organ injury.Materials and methodsFrom 1994–2015, 31 patients with IBMPI and 54 patients with multi-organ injury, who underwent surgery, were retrospectively studied.ResultsOf the 31 patients with IBMPI, 22 were male and 9 were female. The median age was 30 years (interquartile range, 20–38). Twenty-one patients were classified as the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma–Organ Injury Scale Grade III, and 10 patients as Grade IV. Patients with IBMPI had significantly lower shock-at-triage rates, lower injury severity scores, longer injury-to-surgery time, and shorter length of hospital stay than those with multi-organ injury. There were no statistically significant differences in sex, age, trauma mechanism, laboratory data, surgical procedures, and complications between the two groups. Eight patients with IBMPI underwent endoscopic retrograde pancreatography, and 5 patients with complete major pancreatic duct (MPD) disruption underwent pancreatectomy eventually. The remaining 3 patients had partial MPD injury and two of them received a pancreatic duct stent for the treatment of existing postoperative pancreatic fistula. Spleen-sacrificing distal pancreatectomy (SSDP) was performed in 13 patient with IBMPI, followed by spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy (n = 12), peripancreatic drainage (n = 4), and central pancreatectomy with Roux-en-Y reconstruction (n = 2). The overall complication rates, related to the SSDP, SPDP, peripancreatic drainage, and central pancreatectomy, were 10/13 (77%), 4/12 (33%), 3/4 (75%), and 2/2 (100%), respectively. Three patients died resulting in a 10% mortality rate, and the other 16 patients developed intra-abdominal complications resulting in a 52% morbidity rate. In the subgroup analysis of the 25 patients who underwent distal pancreatectomy, SPDP was associated with a shorter injury-to-surgery time than SSDP.ConclusionsPatients with IBMPI have longer injury-to-surgery times, compared to those with multi-organ injury. Of the distal pancreatectomy patients, the time interval from injury to surgery was a significant associated factor in preserving or sacrificing the spleen.     

Outcomes after resection versus non-resection management of penetrating grade III and IV pancreatic injury: A trauma quality improvement (TQIP) databank analysis

BackgroundHigh-grade traumatic pancreatic injuries are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Non-resection management is associated with fewer complications in pediatric patients. The present study evaluates outcomes following resection versus non-resection management of severe pancreatic injury caused by penetrating trauma.MethodsA retrospective study of the Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) database was performed from 1/2010 to 12/2014. Patients with AAST Organ Injury Scale pancreatic grade III and IV injuries caused by penetrating trauma were included in the study. Demographics, vital signs on admission, Abbreviated Injury Scale per body region, Injury Severity Score, transfusion and therapeutic modality were obtained. Mortality, length of stay (LOS), pseudocyst, pancreatitis, sepsis, thromboembolism, renal failure, ARDS and unplanned ICU admission or re-operation were stratified according to injury grade and treatment modality. Patients were stratified into those who did/did not undergo pancreatic resection.ResultsA total of 4,098 patients had a pancreatic injury of which 15.9% (n = 653) had a grade III and 6.7% (n = 274) a grade IV pancreatic injury. There were no differences in patient demographics or overall injury severity between the resected and non-resected cohorts within each pancreatic injury grade. Forty-two percent of grade III and 38.0% of grade IV injuries underwent pancreatic resection. The total LOS was longer in the resection arm irrespective of pancreatic injury severity. There was no significant difference in morbidity between cohorts. Similarly, mortality was not significantly different between the two management approaches for grade III: 15.1% (95% CI 11.0–19.9) vs. 18.4% (95% CI 14.6–22.6), p = 0.32 and grade IV: 24.0% (95% CI: 16.2–33.4) vs. 27.1% (95% CI: 20.5–34.4), p = 0.68.ConclusionResection for treatment of grade III and IV pancreatic injury is not associated with a significant decrease in mortality but is associated with an increase in hospital LOS.     

Correlation of operative and pathological injury grade with computed tomographic grade in the failed nonoperative management of blunt splenic trauma

Background

Computed tomography (CT) is the standard for grading blunt splenic injuries, but the true accuracy, especially for grade IV or V injuries as compared to pathological findings, is unknown.

Study design

A retrospective study from 2005 to 2011 was undertaken.

Results

There were 214 adults admitted with blunt splenic injury and 170 (79%) were managed nonoperatively. The remaining 44 patients (21%) required surgical intervention. There was a significant difference in the Injury Severity Score (ISS) between those who did and those who did not require splenectomy: median 31 (interquartile [IQ] range 11–51) versus 22 (IQ range 9–35, p?=?0.0002). Ten patients presented in shock, had a positive ultrasound, and went to surgery. The remaining 34 had CT scans prior to surgery. Twenty-five (73%) had injury grades IV or V. The CT scan correctly graded the injury in 14 (41%) and was incorrect in 20 (59%). The assigned grade by the CT scan underestimated the true injury grade by one grade in six cases (30%), by two or more grades in nine (45%), and the CT images were obscured by blood and deemed “ungradeable” in five (25%). The CT scan was more accurate for grades I and II (100%) than for grades III–V (25–43%). The reasons for inaccuracy were either inability to visualize that the laceration involved the hilar vessels or excessive perisplenic blood which obscured the injury and/or the hilum.

Conclusions

CT for splenic injury is accurate for grades I and II, but underestimates the true extent of injury for grades III–V. The reasons for the lack of correlation are the inability to determine hilar involvement and excessive perisplenic blood obscuring the injury. Patients with these image characteristics by CT scan should undergo splenectomy earlier if there are any signs of hemodynamic instability.     

Intra-abdominal gastrointestinal tract injuries following blunt trauma: the experience of an Australian trauma centre

AIMS: The aim of the study was to use the extensive experience of an Australian Level I trauma centre to develop guidelines for diagnosis and management of significant gastrointestinal tract injuries (GITIs). METHODS: This was a retrospective study of 74 patients admitted to Westmead Hospital between 1985 and 1996 who had sustained major gastrointestinal tract (GIT) injuries following blunt trauma. The patients were identified from the trauma unit database. Clinical information was retrieved from the database and augmented by a review of the medical records. RESULTS: Motor vehicle accidents were responsible for 55 (92%) admissions. Laparotomy was performed as a result of a positive diagnostic peritoneal lavage in 26 (35.1%) patients, abdominal signs in 20 (27%), diagnostic findings on computed tomography in 19 (25.7%), haemodynamic instability in eight (10.8%) and a positive contrast study in one (1.4%) patient. There was a total of 95 injuries: one gastric (1.1%), eight duodenal (8.4%), 64 small bowel (67.3%), two appendiceal (2.1%), 19 colonic (20%) and one rectal (1.1%). Thirty day mortality was 23% (17 patients). Seven (9.5%) patients died within 24h of injury, three (4.1%) of which were directly related to the GIT. Ten (13.5%) patients died within 2 weeks of admission, three (4.1%) of which were attributable to the GIT. Thirty day GIT morbidity was 29.7% (22 patients). The development of GIT morbidity was significantly related to a delay to laparotomy of more than 24h (P=0.036) and tachycardia on presentation (P=0.023). Associated injuries, injury severity scores (ISS) and age did not significantly impact on GITI related morbidity and mortality. DISCUSSION: Major GITIs are associated with a high mortality due to the severity and complexity of associated injuries. Morbidity from GITIs correlates to delays in diagnosis and management.     

Perioperative management of laryngotracheobronchial injury: our experience in a level 1 trauma centre

Purpose

Laryngotracheobronchial injuries (LTBI) are serious injuries because of their consequences in terms of ventilation, coupled with the severity of other injuries associated with them. We share our experience in managing these patients perioperatively in our level 1 trauma centre.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of the records of 30 patients with LTBI who presented at Jai Prakash Narayan Apex Trauma Center (JPNATC) from December 2007 to February 2011 was done. The demographics, mechanism of injury, clinical presentation, diagnostic modalities, anaesthetic management and outcome in these patients were reviewed.

Results

Intrathoracic location of the injury and Injury Severity Score (ISS) had a direct correlation with the outcome of the patients. The overall mortality was 6.7?%.

Conclusion

Meticulous examination, details about the mechanism of injury, careful diagnostic evaluation, and skilful airway and surgical management are necessary for a better outcome in patients with airway injuries. A high degree of suspicion in occult injuries and liberal use of a fibreoptic bronchoscope aids diagnosis and management. Prompt airway management in the pre-hospital setting before transfer to a higher level trauma centre ensures better outcomes.     

Endovascular management of acute blunt traumatic thoracic aortic injury: a single center experience

BACKGROUND: Traumatic injury of the thoracic aorta is a life-threatening complication in patients who sustain deceleration or crush injuries. The magnitude of force necessary to cause blunt thoracic aortic injury results in a high proportion of concomitant injuries, posing a significant challenge for prioritizing management. Open surgical mortality is increased in the presence of coexisting head, lung, and abdominal injuries. Spinal cord ischemia may occur following aortic cross-clamping and operative hypotension. Endovascular stent-graft placement offers a safe, effective, and timely treatment option. The aim of this study was to assess our single center experience of endovascular repair following acute blunt traumatic aortic injury. METHODS: Data from thirteen consecutive patients (mean age, 43.2 years; range, 16 to 84 years) with acute blunt traumatic aortic injury treated by endovascular stent-graft insertion between October 2001 and March 2007 was prospectively collected. Demographics, injury characteristics, technique, and complications were recorded. Follow-up data consisted of computed tomographic angiography and plain chest radiography at regular intervals. Mean and median follow-up after stent-graft implantation were 28.9 and 29 months, respectively. RESULTS: All patients underwent endovascular repair within a median of 9 hours from hospital presentation. Two patients underwent carotico-carotid bypass immediately prior to endovascular stenting during a single anesthetic. Stent-graft implantation was technically successful in all patients. No patient required conversion to open surgical repair of the acute blunt traumatic aortic injury. Procedure-related paraplegia was zero. Complications included proximal migration of initial stent-graft in one patient and iliac artery avulsion in another patient with consequent ilio-femoral bypass. The median hospital stay was 17 days. There were no in-hospital deaths. CONCLUSION: Endovascular repair is evolving as the procedure of choice for acute blunt traumatic aortic injury. Treatment of lesions that extend into the aortic arch is feasible with extra-anatomical bypass. In our study, endovascular repair of blunt traumatic aortic injury is a safe procedure with low morbidity and a mortality rate of zero.     

Intentional injury against children in Sub-Saharan Africa: A tertiary trauma centre experience

BackgroundIntentional injuries are the result of violence. This is an important public health issue, particularly in children, and is an unaddressed problem in sub-Saharan Africa. This study sought to describe the characteristics of intentional injury, particularly physical abuse, in children presenting to our tertiary trauma centre in Lilongwe, Malawi and how they compare to children with unintentional injuries.MethodsA retrospective analysis of children (<18 years old) with traumatic injuries presenting to Kamuzu Central Hospital (KCH) in Lilongwe, Malawi from 2009 to 2013 was performed. Children with intentional and unintentional injuries were compared with bivariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression modelling.Results67,672 patients with traumatic injuries presented to KCH of which 24,365 were children. 1976 (8.1%) patients presented with intentional injury. Intentional injury patients had a higher mean age (11.1 ± 5.0 vs. 7.1 ± 4.6, p < 0.001), a greater male preponderance (72.5 vs. 63.6%, p < 0.001), were more often injured at night (38.3 vs. 20.7%, p < 0.001), and alcohol was more often involved (7.8 vs. 1.0%, p < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression modelling showed that increasing age, male gender, and nighttime or urban setting for injury were associated with increased odds of intentional injury. Soft tissue injuries were more common in intentional injury patients (80.5 vs. 45.4%, p < 0.001) and fist punches were the most common weapon (25.6%). Most patients were discharged in both groups (89.2 vs 80.9%, p < 0.001) and overall mortality was lower for intentional injury patients (0.9 vs. 1.2%, p = 0.001). Head injury was the most common cause of death (43.8 vs. 32.2%, p < 0.001) in both groups.ConclusionsSub-Saharan African tertiary hospitals are uniquely positioned to play a pivotal role in the identification, clinical management, and alleviation of intentional injuries to children by facilitating access to social services and through prevention efforts.     

Nonoperative management of blunt splenic trauma: a multicenter experience

The experience of six referral trauma centers with 832 blunt splenic injuries was reviewed to determine the indications, methods, and outcome of nonoperative management. During this 5-year period, 112 splenic injuries were intentionally managed by observation. There were 40 (36%) patients less than 16 years old and 72 adults. The diagnosis was established by computed tomography in 89 (79%) patients, nuclear scan in 23 (21%), ultrasound in four (4%), and arteriography in two (2%). There were 28 Class I, 51 Class II, 31 Class III, two Class IV, and no Class V splenic injuries. Nonoperative management was unsuccessful in one (2%) child and 12 (17%) adults (p less than 0.05). Failure was due to ongoing hemorrhage in 12 patients and delayed recognition of pancreatic injury in one patient. Of the 12 patients ultimately requiring laparotomy for control of hemorrhage, seven (58%) were successfully treated with splenic salvage techniques. Overall mortality was 3%; none of the four deaths was due to splenic or associated abdominal injury. This contemporary multicenter experience suggests that patients with Class I, II, or III splenic injuries after blunt trauma are candidates for nonoperative management if there is: 1) no hemodynamic instability after initial fluid resuscitation; 2) no serious associated abdominal organ injury; and 3) no extra-abdominal condition which precludes assessment of the abdomen. Strict adherence to these principles yielded initial nonoperative success in 98% of children and 83% of adults. Application of standard splenic salvage techniques to treat the patients with persistent hemorrhage resulted in ultimate splenic preservation in 100% of children and 93% of adults.     

Nonoperative management of blunt pancreatic injury in childhood

PURPOSE: Nonoperative management for blunt pancreatic injury in children was performed between 1977 and 1998. The efficiency and safety of nonoperative management was examined. METHODS: Pancreatic injury was diagnosed in 20 children. The surgical indication was determined by hemodynamic instability and the management of associated injuries. Children without surgical indications were treated initially by nonoperative management. RESULTS: Nineteen of 20 children were treated initially nonoperatively, and 18 of the 19 survived. Surgical exploration was performed in only 1 child with perforation of the duodenum and bile duct. One child died of complications of total parenteral nutrition. Ultrasound scan and computed tomography scan showed pancreatic contusion in 9, laceration in 6, and injury of the main pancreatic duct (MPD) in 5. Pseudocysts were detected in 10 (5 laceration and 5 MPD injury). Pseudocysts smaller than 10 cm disappeared after nonoperative management, and those larger than 10 cm required operative management. Rupture of pseudocysts occurred in 2 children by rotating the upper torso. CONCLUSIONS: Nonoperative management of pancreatic injuries is effective in children, although careful management is required to avoid complications. Pseudocysts smaller than 10 cm were treated successfully by nonoperative management, and those larger than 10 cm required surgical management.     

Assessment of cardiac injury in patients with blunt chest trauma

Background  

There has been difficulty in the appropriate determination of blunt cardiac injury (BCI) related to blunt thoracic trauma (BTT). The aim of this study is to assess BCI and the effectiveness of diagnostic tests in BTT in patients admitted to the emergency department (ED).     

Operative vs nonoperative management of blunt pancreatic trauma in children

Purpose

The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of nonoperative vs operative management of blunt pancreatic trauma in children.

Methods

Retrospective review of pancreatic injuries from 1995 to 2006 at an urban level I regional pediatric trauma center.

Results

Forty-three children with pancreatic injury were included in the analysis. Injuries included grade I (n = 18), grade II (n = 6), grade III (n = 17), and grade IV (n = 2). For grade II to IV injuries, patients managed operatively (n = 14) and nonoperatively (n = 11) had similar lengths of stay and rates of readmission, despite increased pancreatic complications (PCs) in the nonoperative cohort (21% vs 73%; P = .02). There was a trend toward increased non-PCs in patients managed with resection (P = .07). Twelve patients underwent successful diagnostic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in which duct injury was identified. In this group, nonoperative management was pursued in 6 patients but was associated with increased rates of PC (86% nonoperative vs 29% operative; P = .02).

Conclusions

Operative management of children with grades II to IV pancreatic injury results in significantly decreased rates of PCs but fails to decrease length of stay in the hospital, possibly as a result of non-PCs. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography may serve as a useful diagnostic modality for guiding operative vs nonoperative management decisions.     

Efficacy of computed tomography in the diagnosis of pancreatic injury in adult blunt trauma patients: a single-institutional study

Blunt trauma to the pancreas is an uncommon injury, which can be difficult to diagnose. Most studies are multi-institutional, include both helical and axial CT, and report sensitivities of 40 to 67 per cent. We evaluated the efficacy of spiral CT for the diagnosis of blunt pancreatic injury in a single large-volume institution. We retrospectively reviewed 22,000 blunt trauma patients seen between 1996 and 2000. Pancreatic injury was identified in 40 patients (0.2%). All patients evaluated with spiral CT were given both oral and intravenous contrast. A total of 40 blunt pancreatic injuries were identified. The mean age was 35 years. Seventy-five per cent were male. Mean Injury Severity Scale score was 29 and overall mortality 12.5 per cent. Thirty-one patients (78%) underwent laparotomy. Twelve patients went directly to the operating room for urgent exploration and 19 had a preoperative CT. CT was positive for pancreatic injury in 13 patients (sensitivity 68%). All 13 patients had confirmed pancreatic injury at the time of surgery (positive predictive value = 100%). Using the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma grading system operative findings and CT correlated in 68 per cent of those patients who had both CT and laparotomy. CT underestimated pancreatic injury in the remaining 31 per cent. Nine patients were managed nonoperatively without complication, and six had pancreatic injury on CT. The other three had a negative CT but had clinical and laboratory evidence of pancreatic injury. Overall CT scan was 68 per cent (19 of 28) accurate in diagnosing pancreatic injury. We conclude that CT scan is only moderately sensitive and can underestimate or miss pancreatic injury. Although CT moderately correlated with injury grade it was highly predictive for presence of injury. The new multidetector helical scanner may improve our diagnostic ability.     

Extra-hepatic biliary injury secondary to blunt abdominal trauma: A successful management strategy

Extra-hepatic bile duct injury from blunt abdominal trauma is uncommon. Complete traumatic transection of the common bile duct (CBD) with subsequent complication of a choledochoduodenal fistula is extremely rare and only a handful of reports are found in the medical literature. We describe a 20-year-old male patient who presented with a complete transection of the CBD following blunt abdominal trauma and his subsequent planned staged management.     

Emergency percutaneous thoracic endovascular aortic repair for patients with traumatic thoracic aortic blunt injury: A single center experience

Purpose:To analyze the efficacy and outcome of percutaneous thoracic endovascular aortic repair(TEVAR)in patients with traumatic blunt aortic injury in our single-center.Methods:From January 2014 to December 2018,a total of 89 patients with traumatic blunt aortic injuries were treated with emergency TEVAR in our center.Their clinical data such as demographics,operative details and postprocedure outcomes were analyzed retrospectively in this study using SPSS 20 software.Continuous variables were expressed as mean and standard deviation or median and interquartile range.Categorical variables are expressed as the numbers and percentages of patients.Results:The median age of the patients was 37 years,and 76(85.4%)were males.All the patients were involved in violent accidents and combined with associated injuries.Two patients died while awaiting the operations and 87 patients underwent emergency percutaneous TEVAR,with a 100%technique success.The mean time interval from admission to operating room was(90.1±18.7)min,and the mean procedure time was(54.6±11.9)min.Eighty(92.0%)patients were operated on under local anesthesia,while other 7(8.0%)patients were under general anesthesia.Two cases underwent open repair of the femoral arteries because of the pseudoaneurysm formation of the access vessels.A total of 98 aortic covered stent grafts were deployed,of which 11 patients used two stent grafts(all in dissection cases).The length of the stent was(177.5±24.6)mm.The horizontal diameter of aorta arch at the proximal left subclavian artery ostium was(24.9±2.4)mm,the proximal diameter of the covered stent was(30.5±2.6)mm,and the oversize rate of proximal site was(22.7±4.0)%.The proximal landing zone length was(14.1±5.5)mm.The left subclavian artery ostium was completely covered in 5 patients and partially covered in 32 patients.No blood flow reconstruction was performed.The overall aortic-related mortality was 2.25%(2/89).Among 87 patients,the median follow-up time was 24 months.Postoperative computed tomography angiography scans demonstrated no residual pseudoaneurysm,hematoma or endoleak.One patient complained of mild left upper limb weakness during follow-up due to left subclavian artery occlusion.Neither late death,nor neurological or other complications occurred.Conclusion:Emergency percutaneous endovascular repair is a less invasive and effective approach for the treatment of traumatic blunt aortic injuries.Long-term results remain to be further followed.     

Clinical management of blunt trauma patients with unilateral rib fractures: A randomized trial

Optimal pain management is essential in blunt trauma patients sustaining significant chest trauma. The purpose of this randomized prospective trial was to measure the difference in pulmonary function in nonintubated patients with unilateral multiple rib fractures receiving two modalities of pain relief: systemic narcotic medications alone or local anesthetics given by intrapleural catheter (IPCs). Forty-two patients were randomized to receive systemic narcotic medications or IPCs for pain control. The patients with IPCs statistically had more compromised pulmonary function as measured by forced vital capacity (FVC) on admission; however, they tended toward a greater objective improvement of FVC on discharge. When analyzing a cohort of severely impaired patients (initial FVC<20%), half of the systemic medication patients compared to only 10% of the IPC group failed and required another mode of therapy. Catheter complications were minor and did not contribute to overall morbidity. The IPC patients had fewer failures than the systemic medication patients.

---

Resumen El manejo óptimo de dolor es un componente esencial en los pacientes con trauma torácico cerrado. El propósito de este ensayo prospectivo y randomizado fue determinar diferencias en la función pulmonar entre pacientes con fracturas múltiples unilaterales no intubados y recibiendo dos modalidades de control del dolor: medicación narcótica sistémica solamente o anestésicos locales por catéter intrapleural. Cuarenta y dos pacientes fueron randomizados para recibir medicacións sistémica o anestésicos locales por catéter intrapleural. Los pacientes con el catéter demostraban estadísticamente mayor compromiso de su función pulmonar, según medición de la capacidad vital forzada (FVC) en el momento de la admisión; sin embargo, mostraron una tendencia hacia una mayor mejoría objetiva de la FVC en el momento de su egreso. Al analizar una cohorte de los pacientes más severamente afectados (FVC<20%), la mitad de los tratados mediante narcóticos sistémicos comparado con sólo 10% del grupo del catéter fallaron y requirieron una modalida terapéutica diferente. Las complicaciones de catéter fueron menores y no contribuyeron a la morbilidad global. Los pacientes con catéter exhibieron menos fallas terapéuticas que los tratados con medicación sistémica.

---

Résumé Il est essentiel de bien traiter la douleur post traumatique du thorax. Le but de cette étude randomisée a été mesurer la fonction pulmonaire des patients non intubés avec de multiples fractures costales recevant deux sortes d'antalgiques, des narcotiques par voie systématique ou une anesthésie locale par cathéter intra pleural (CIP). Quarante deux patients on été randomisées pour recevoir l'une ou l'autre des modalités thérapeutiques. Les patients dans le groupe CIP avaient une capacité vitale totale diminuée par rapport aux autres á l'admission. Leur CIP s'améliorait davantage à la sortie. Lorsqu'un groupe de patients plus sévèrement atteints (CIP<20%) était analysés, la moitié des patients dans le groupe traité par voie systématique était soulagé alors que 90% des patients traités par CIP ont eu de bons résultats. Les complications en rapport avec le cathéter étaient mineures et n'ont pas influencé les résultats. Les patients avec un CIP ont mieux répondu au traitement.