The outcome of intracapsular hip fracture fixation using the Targon Femoral Neck (TFN) locking plate system or cannulated cancellous screws: A comparative study involving 2004 patients

AimThis study compares the outcome of intracapsular hip fracture fixation using the Targon Femoral Neck (TFN) locking plate system with the standard fixation using cannulated cancellous screws (CCS).Patients and methodAnalyses of a prospectively collected data of all patients treated for intracapsular hip fractures using the TFN system and CCS at our department over a period of 28 years. Baseline characteristics and specific outcome measures where compared. The primary outcome measure was fracture revision during the 1st year. Secondary outcome measures were fracture complications, any revision surgery, mortality and mobility status at one year after surgery.ResultsA total of 2004 fractures were included, a third (n = 725, 36.2%) were treated using the TFN system. There were higher rates of non-union (19.5% vs 9.5%) and revision surgery (19% vs 9%) during the first year in the CCS cohort. Revision surgery was also higher in the same group during the whole of the follow-up period (22.2% vs 14.9%). The first year’s mortality rate was higher in the CCS cohort (21.1% vs 17.5%) but the reduction in mobility and mobility scores was the same in both cohorts.ConclusionThis study includes the largest cohort of cases treated for intracapsular hip fractures using the TFN system. It demonstrated that the TFN system was associated with lower rates of non-union, revisions and re-operations for any cause.     

What makes fixation of femoral neck fractures fail? A systematic review and meta-analysis of risk factors

IntroductionThis systematic review aims to provide an overview of predictors for failure of treatment of displaced femoral neck fracture (dFNF) with internal fixation and quantify their risk of fixation failure in a meta-analysis.Patients and methodsPubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and EMCare were searched for original studies published from January 2000, including adult patients with an internally fixated dFNF, that reported data on predictors for fixation failure defined as revision surgery due to non-union, avascular femoral head necrosis or cut-out of implant. RevMan version 5 software was used to pool univariable Odds Ratio's (OR) for predictors of fixation failure by means of a random effects model.ResultsThis review included 16 articles (15 articles cohort studies and one randomised trial). Twenty-four predictors for fixation failure were identified and analysed, 16 of which were evaluated in just one study. Data of 7 predictors were pooled in a meta-analysis. Female sex (OR 1.78, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.26–2.52), smoking (OR 3.64, 95% CI 1.68–7.91), age >50 years (OR 3.64, 95% CI 1.68–7.91), inadequate fracture reduction (OR 2.28, 95% CI 1.62–3.22), fixation with cannulated screws (CS) or pins compared to fixed angle devices (OR 2.16, 95% CI 1.03–4.54) were identified as significant predictors for fixation failure.ConclusionThis study can help surgeons to choose the preferred treatment for patients with a dFNF and substantiate future algorithms and guidelines for treatment of FNF.     

Role of preoperative posterior tilt on the outcomes of internal fixation of non-displaced femoral neck fractures: A systematic review and meta-analysis

IntroductionThere has been an increased interest in the role of preoperative posterior tilt, as measured on lateral radiographs, on the outcomes of internal fixation of non-displaced femoral neck fractures (FNF). The goal was to assess the available evidence for this in the literature.Patients and methodsPRISMA guidelines were followed. PubMed, Embase and Cochrane were searched on June 10th, 2020 for studies assessing the role of posterior tilt on outcomes of internal fixation of non-displaced FNF. Primary outcomes were non-union and fixation failure, avascular necrosis (AVN), treatment failure, and reoperation (excluding symptomatic hardware removal). Outcomes were reported in Odds Ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals [CI].ResultsFourteen studies and 3729 patients were included (mean age 76 years, 72% female, mean follow-up 25 months). Moderate evidence was noted for the following: patients with greater preoperative posterior tilt had an increased risk of non-union and fixation failure (OR 2.4 [1.3 – 4.3]; p = 0.006), no increased risk of AVN (p = 0.550), an increased risk of treatment failure (OR 6.0 [2.2 – 15.9]; p<0.001) and reoperation (OR 2.5 [1.4 – 4.4]; p = 0.002). Furthermore, a greater preoperative tilt of 9.0° [4.1° – 13.9°] for treatment failure and 6.1° [3.7° – 8.5°] (p<0.001) for reoperation were noted in the unsuccessfully treated groups when compared to the successfully treated groups. Four studies found a threshold for posterior tilt ranging from 7° to 20°ConclusionThere is moderate evidence that patients with non-displaced FNF and greater tilt have an increased risk of unsuccessful outcomes following internal fixation. Older patients with a preoperative tilt of ≥20° might benefit from arthroplasty surgery, although studies assessing the optimal threshold are needed.     

Fibular fixation in mid and distal extra-articular tibia fractures – A systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundThe surgical management of extra-articular mid and distal tibia fractures has primarily focused on reducing rates of non-union and malunion, preserving hip-knee-ankle alignment and improving functional outcomes. Fibular fractures commonly accompany these injuries and the contributory role of fixation of these fractures has been increasingly studied. A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to determine whether concurrent fibular fixation (FF) during extra-articular mid and distal tibia fracture fixation (AO/OTA 42 and 43-A) altered the risk of malunion, non-union and post-operative complications when compared to no fibular fixation (NF).MethodsA systematic search of literature in the databases of MEDLINE (via OvidSP), PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) from the dates of inception was performed for randomised and non-randomised controlled trials. All studies published in English were included. Risk of Bias in Non-randomised Studies (ROBINS-I) and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) framework were utilised. Relative risk (RR) was used for dichotomous outcomes, while mean difference (MD) was used for continuous variables, with 95% confidence intervals. Alpha was set at 0.05.ResultsA total of ten studies with 1174 patients were included for analysis. There was a statistically significant reduced risk of overall malunion in the FF group compared to the NF group (11.8% vs 21.9%, RR 0.63, 95% CI: 0.41–0.98, p = 0.04) and this was supported through a sensitivity analysis of only randomised controlled trials (21.8% vs 40.3%, RR 0.37, 95% CI: 0.18–0.76, p = 0.006). There was no statistically significant difference in rates of non-union between groups (p > 0.05). Overall, there were similar incidences of diabetes, open fractures and smoking history between groups (p > 0.05). Detailed information regarding methods of tibial fixation were not available for subgroup analysis.ConclusionIn conclusion, in extra-articular mid and distal tibia (AO/OTA 42 and 43-A) fracture fixation, additional fibular fixation (FF) appears to significantly reduce the risk of overall malunion (RR, 0.37, 95% CI: 0.18–0.76, p = 0.006) without increasing the risk of non-union. These results should be interpreted with caution given the lack of subgroup analysis for methods of tibial fixation. Future high-quality randomised controlled trials should therefore delineate between types of tibial fixation.     

Increased Rates of Readmission,Reoperation, and Mortality Following Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Ankle Fractures Are Associated With Diabetes Mellitus

The purpose of this study was to compare the rates of readmission, reoperation, and mortality in patients with and without diabetes mellitus during the 30-day postoperative period after ankle fracture surgery. Patients who underwent operative management for ankle fractures between 2006 and 2015 were identified in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program® database by using Current Procedural Terminology codes for ankle fracture surgery. A total of 17,464 patients undergoing ankle fracture surgery were identified. Of these patients, 2044 (11.7%) had diabetes and 15,420 (88.3%) did not have diabetes. We excluded patients older than 90 years or with inadequate perioperative data. Patients with diabetes had significantly higher rates of readmission (2.84% vs 1.05%, p < .0001), significantly higher rates of unplanned reoperation (2.3% vs 0.74%, p < .0001), and significantly higher rates of mortality (0.7% vs 0.2%, p < .0001) compared with patients without diabetes. Additionally, patients with diabetes had significantly greater age-adjusted odds ratios (ORs) of unplanned readmission (OR 2.40, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.74 to 3.31, p < .0001), unplanned reoperation (OR 2.56, 95% CI 1.44 to 3.27, p < .0001), and mortality (OR 2.01, 95% CI 1.08 to 3.62, p = .0432) than did patients without diabetes after ankle surgery. In this large-scale retrospective study, we demonstrated that the presence of diabetes significantly increases the risk of unplanned readmission, unplanned reoperation, and mortality during the 30-day postoperative period after ankle fracture surgery.     

Effectiveness and complications of primary C-clamp stabilization or external fixation for unstable pelvic fractures

Background and purposeUnstable pelvic fractures frequently require emergency stabilization using a C-clamp or external (CC/EF) fixation. However, the effectiveness of this intervention and associated complications are still a matter of debate.Patients and methodsThe analysis used data available from the German Pelvic Trauma Registry to study general complications, infections and mortality after primary stabilization using CC/EF in 5,499 patients (n = 957 with vs n = 4,542 without). Furthermore, the subgroups with secondary surgery (n = 713 vs n = 1,695), and ilio-sacral screw implantation following C-clamp stabilization were evaluated (n = 24 vs n = 219). Calculated odds ratios were adjusted for potential confounders.ResultsPatients treated by CC/EF were younger (45 ± 20 vs 62 ± 24 years), had more C-type fractures (65% vs 28%), higher ISS (≥25 63% vs 20%) and displacement (≥3 mm 81% vs 41%), and more complex fractures (32% vs 5%). These features were independent risk factors for complications (p < 0.001). While mortality was reduced after CC/EF stabilization by 32% (OR 0.68 95%CI 0.49-0.95), the risk for general complications was slightly increased (OR 1.25 95% CI 1.02–1.53). In patients undergoing secondary surgery, CC/EF fixation had no influence on mortality, general complications or infections. Related to preceding C-clamp stabilization (OR 4.67 95% CI 1.06–20.64), the risk for infection increased from 3.2% to 20.8% in ilio-sacral screw fixation.InterpretationPrimary stabilization of unstable pelvic fractures with C-clamp or external fixation is associated with a decreased mortality and was not an independent risk factor for complications after secondary surgery. However, the risk for infection after ilio-sacral screw fixation increased almost 5-fold after C-clamp use.     

Mid-term functional and radiological outcomes after total hip replacement performed for complications of acetabular fractures

ObjectiveAcetabular fractures can lead to serious complications such as avascular necrosis of the femoral head (AVN), osteoarthritis, non-union. Total hip replacement (THR) is a treatment option for these complications. The purpose of this study was to assess the functional and radiological outcomes of THR at least 5 years after the primary implantation.MethodsThis retrospective study analysed clinical data from 77 patients (59 males, 18 females) who were treated from 2001 to 2022. Data was collected on the incidence of AVN of the femoral head, complications, interval from fracture to THR, reimplantation. The modified Harris Hip Score (MHHS) was used to evaluate outcome.ResultsThe mean age at the time of fracture was 48 years. Avascular necrosis developed in 56 patients (73%), with 3 cases of non-union. Osteoarthritis without AVN developed in 20 patients (26%), non-union without AVN in one patient (1%). The mean time from fracture to THR was 24 months for AVN with non-union, 23 months for AVN alone, 22 months for AVN with arthritis, 49 months for hip osteoarthritis without AVN. The time interval was significantly shorter for cases of AVN than for cases of osteoarthritis without AVN (p = 0.0074). Type C1 acetabular fracture was found to be a risk factor for femoral head AVN (p = 0.0053). Common complications of acetabular fractures included post-traumatic sciatic nerve paresis (17%), deep venous thrombosis (4%), infections (4%). Hip dislocation was the most common complication of THR (17%). There were no cases of thrombosis following THR. According to Kaplan-Meier analysis, the proportion of patients without revision surgery within 10-year period was 87.4% (95% CI 86.7–88.1). The results of the MHHS after THR: 59.3% of patients had excellent results, 7.4% good, 9.3% satisfactory results, and 24.0% had poor results. The mean MHHS was 84 points (95% CI 78.5–89.5). Paraarticular ossifications were observed in 69.4% of patients in the radiological evaluation.ConclusionTotal hip replacement is an effective treatment for serious complications of acetabular fracture treatment. Its results are comparable to THR peformed for other indications, although it is associated with a higher number of paraarticular ossifications. Type C1 acetabular fracture was found to be a significant risk factor for early femoral head AVN.     

Surgical factors associated with symptomatic implant removal after patella fracture

ObjectivesTo determine whether certain types of fixation and other factors associated with the fixation could be identified that predict an increased risk of symptomatic implant removal.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study at our urban academic level 1 trauma center. Patients aged ≥18 years who underwent operative fixation for patella fracture were included. The primary outcome was symptomatic implant removal after operative fixation.ResultsOf the 186 study patients (mean age, 44 [SD 17] years, 65% male), 53 patients (28.5%) underwent symptomatic implant removal. Modifiable risk factors for symptomatic implant removal included the use of Kirschner (k)-wires (OR: 4.93; 95% CI, 1.89–14.10; p < 0.001), and a trend towards significance for implant prominence >5 mm (OR: 2.57; 95% CI, 0.93–7.93; p = 0.07). Symptomatic implant removal was also less likely in patients >45 years of age (OR: 0.14; 95% CI, 0.06–0.34; p < 0.01), of a racial minority (OR: 0.40; 95% CI, 0.17–0.88; p = 0.03), and a body mass index >25 kg/m² (OR: 0.39; 95% CI, 0.18–0.84; p = 0.02). The final model demonstrated excellent prognostic performance, with an AUC of 0.83 (0.76–0.90).ConclusionWe identified both modifiable and non-modifiable factors associated with symptomatic implant removal in patients with patella fractures. Surgeons should be aware that the use of k-wires and any implant prominence exceeding 5 mm might be associated with increased odds of symptomatic implant removal in patients with patella fractures.     

Intraoperative Complications and Early Return to the Operating Room in Total Hip Arthroplasty Performed Through the Direct Anterior and Posterior Approaches. An Institutional Experience of Surgeons After Their Learning Curve

BackgroundProponents of the direct anterior approach (DAA) for total hip arthroplasty (THA) claim a faster recovery, whereas critics claim an increased risk of early femoral complications. This study analyzed intraoperative and postoperative complications requiring reoperation within one year after THA through the DAA and posterior approach (PA).MethodsA total of 2348 elective, unilateral DAA THAs in patients with osteoarthritis performed between 2016 and 2019 were matched 1:1 for age (±5 years), gender, body mass index (±5), and femoral fixation with 2348 patients who underwent PA THA during the same period. Mixed-effects logistic regression was used. Odds ratios were reported for the occurrence of intraoperative femoral fracture, postoperative femoral fracture, infection, dislocation, and other etiologies requiring reoperation within one year.ResultsIntraoperative femoral fracture occurred in 12 DAA (0.5%) and 14 PA (0.6%) patients. Twenty-five patients (1.06%) in the DAA and 28 (1.19%) in the PA group underwent reoperation within the first year. Reoperations were due to periprosthetic fracture (40%), infection (28%), dislocation (23%), and other (9%). Regression analysis revealed no difference in intraoperative femoral fracture (odds ratio (OR): 0.86, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.40-1.86, P = .69), postoperative femoral fracture (OR: 1.10, 95% CI: 0.47-2.60, P = .83), infection (OR: 1.50, 95% CI: 0.53-5.23, P = .44), or reoperation within one year for other reasons (OR: 1.50, 95% CI: 0.25-9.00, P = .65). DAA had fewer dislocations requiring reoperation (OR: 0.20, 95% CI: 0.04-0.91, P = .02).ConclusionThis comparative study did not find differences in intraoperative or postoperative fracture or infection between DAA and PA. DAA was associated with a lower likelihood of reoperation for dislocation within one year of surgery.     

Long-term differences in clinical prognosis between crossed- and parallel-cannulated screw fixation in vertical femoral neck fractures of non-geriatric patients

Background and PurposeVertical femoral neck fractures (VFNFs) are one of the most difficult fractures to stabilize, with high non-union (17%), avascular necrosis (AVN, 21%), and femoral neck shortening (FNS, 29.0%) rates. The objective of this investigation was to directly compare the long-term clinical complication rates of VFNFs repaired by crossed (Alpha fixation) or parallel screws in non-geriatric patients.Patients and MethodsWe conducted a retrospective comparative study of VFNFs in patients (<60 years) between January 2014 and December 2017, with at least 2 years of follow-up. VFNFs were fixed with either three parallel screws (G-TRI) or augmented with a crossed screw (G-ALP). Confounding variables included age, gender, initial displacement, ISS (Injury Severity Score), general comorbidities, combined fractures, Pauwels angle, reduction quality. Complications, including non-union, AVN of the femoral head and FNS were compared as outcome indicators. Risk factors associated with these variables were further analysed using multivariate analysis.ResultsA total of 157 patients (97 G-TRI; 60 G-ALP) met inclusion criteria. G-ALP had a significantly lower rate of FNS (8.3% vs. 28.9%, p = 0.039) than that of G-TRI. non-union (3.3% vs. 11.3%), AVN (21.7% vs. 25.8%), and reoperation rates (21.7% vs. 23.7%) were lower in G-ALP than G-TRI but was not statistically significant. Multivariate analyses showed significant relationships between NU and unacceptable reduction quality (OR=7.610; 1.823–31.770, adjusted-p = 0.015); between AVN and initial displacement (Garden III and IV) (OR=7.885; 1.739–35.744, adjusted-p = 0.021); and between FNS and screw configuration (OR=5.713; 1.839–17.743, adjusted-p = 0.009).ConclusionFor the treatment of VFNFs, satisfactory reduction still remains the key surgical goal that prevents NU, while the incidence of AVN strongly depends on the initial displacement at the time of injury. Crossed screws were associated with a markedly lower FNS rate than parallel screws, which promote further randomised controlled trials to establish a guideline for optimal fixation selection in VFNFs.     

Urinary tract infection (UTI) at time of geriatric hip fracture surgery increases the risk of experiencing adverse 30-day outcomes

IntroductionPre-operative urinary tract infection (UTI) may be associated with a high rate of complications following surgeries. Few studies have investigated the clinical impact of a pre-operative UTI on post-operative outcomes following surgeries for hip-fracture in geriatric patients.MethodsThe 2015–2016 ACS-NSQIP database was queried for patients undergoing hip fracture surgery using CPT-Codes for Total Hip Arthroplasty (27130), Hemiarthroplasty (27125) and Open Reduction/Internal Fixation (ORIF) (27236, 27244, 27245). Only patients ≥65 years of age undergoing surgery due to a traumatic hip fracture were included in the study.ResultsOut of 31,621 patients undergoing surgical treatment for a hip fracture, 410 (1.3%) had UTI at the time of the surgery. Following adjusted logistic regression analysis, UTI present at the time of surgery was associated with a longer length of stay>5 days (OR 5.46 [95% CI 2.27–13.1]; p = 0.008), any complication (OR 1.33 [95% CI 1.49–1.63]; p = 0.007), infectious complications (OR 1.71 [95% CI 1.19–2.47]; p = 0.004), non-infectious complications (OR 1.28 [95% CI 1.04–1.58]; p = 0.021), 30-day unplanned re-operations (OR 1.96 [95% CI 1.25–3.06]; p = 0.003) and 30-day readmissions (OR 2.04 [95% CI 1.57–2.66]; p < 0.001). With regards to infectious complications, presence of a UTI at time of surgery was a significant independent predictor of sepsis (OR 2.44 [95% CI 1.24–4.80]; p = 0.010) and septic shock (OR 4.05 [95% CI 2.03–8.08]; p < 0.001).ConclusionsPatients undergoing hip-fracture surgery with a concurrent UTI at the time of surgery have more adverse 30-day outcomes as compared to hip fracture patients who do not present with a UTI. Despite adjustment for a delay in the time to surgery, the impact of UTI on post-operative outcomes remained significant. While it is difficult to eradicate a UTI in a non-elective population, the findings stress the need for clinical optimization and potential need for early recognition/management of UTI in patients who sustain a hip fracture to minimize the risk of adverse outcomes.     

Fixed angle device comparison in young femoral neck fractures: Dynamic hip screw vs dynamic helical hip system

IntroductionFemoral neck fractures in the young patient present a unique challenge. Most surgeons managing these injuries prefer a fixed angle implant, however these devices are fraught with problems. A dynamic hip screw (DHS) is one such fixed angle device that risks malreduction through rotational torque during screw insertion. To avoid this risk some surgeons utilize a dynamic helical hip system (DHHS), however little is known about the complication profile of this device. We hypothesized that the complication rate between these two devices would be similar.Patients and MethodsAll patients presenting to a single tertiary referral center with a femoral neck fracture were identified from a prospectively collected trauma database over an 11-year period. Patients were included if they were less than 60 years of age, treated with a DHS or DHHS, and had at least 6 months of follow-up. Demographic data, injury characteristics, and post-operative complications were obtained through chart review. Standard statistical comparisons were made between groups. A total of 77 patients met inclusion criteria.ResultsAverage age of patients was 38 years (range: 18–59) and 56 (73%) were male. The DHS was used in 37 (48%) patients and the DHHS was used in 40 (52%) patients. Demographic data including average age, gender, body mass index, and smoking status did not differ between the groups. There were 29 (39%) total complications of interest (femoral neck shortening >5 mm, non-union requiring osteotomy, conversion to THA, and osteonecrosis. There were 19 (51%) complications in the DHS group and 10 (25%) in the DHHS group (p = 0.01, risk difference 25%, 95% CI 7–43). Comparisons of the individual complications about the DHS and DHHS cohort did not reach statistical significance for non-union (8% vs 3%) or THA (16% vs 13%) (p = 0.33, p = 0.64, respectively) but a difference was detected in the rate of shortening (27% vs 10%; p = 0.05).ConclusionThis study demonstrates a high risk of complication when managing young femoral neck fractures in line with prior literature. The major complication rate of non-union requiring osteotomy or fixation failure resulting in THA was no different between the two groups, but the rate of shortening was greater the DHS group. This data suggests the DHHS may be a suitable device to manage the young femoral neck fracture and without increased risk of complication.     

Short versus long thread cannulated cancellous screws for intracapsular hip fractures: A randomised trial of 432 patients

It is unclear which length of thread may be most advantageous for the internal fixation of an intracapsular fracture with cancellous screws. We have compared the 16 mm versus the 32 mm threads on cancellous screws within a randomised trial for 432 patients. All fractures were fixed with three screws and patients followed-up for a minimum of one year from injury.The characteristics of the patients in the two groups were similar with a mean age of 76 years. 23% were male. The most common complication encountered was non-union of the fracture which for undisplaced fractures occurred in 7/107 (6.5%) of short threaded screws versus 11/133 (8.3%) of long threaded screws. For displaced fractures the figures were 29/104 (27.9%) versus 24/89 (27.0%). Other complications for the short versus long threaded group were avascular necrosis (two cases versus five cases) and fracture below the implant (two cases in each group). Elective removal of the screws for discomfort was undertaken in five and three cases, respectively. None of these differences between groups was statistically significant. In summary there is no difference in fracture healing complications related to the length of the screw threads.     

Postoperative complication rates following total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) vs. reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA): A nationwide analysis

BackgroundHistorically, anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) has been the gold-standard of care for patients with glenohumeral osteoarthritis refractory to nonoperative treatment. With expanding indications, utilization of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) has been rapidly increasing. The purpose of this study was to use a nationwide patient database with contemporary data to identify and compare joint and systemic complication rates following primary TSA and RSA.MethodsPatients records of patients receiving TSA or RSA were queried from PearlDiver (Fort Wayne, IN), a commercially available administrative claims database, using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision and Tenth Revision (ICD-9/ICD-10) and Current Procedural Technology (CPT) codes. Incidences of postoperative joint complications were measured at 90-days and 1-year post-discharge. Incidences of systemic complications were measured at 90-days post-discharge. Complication rates were compared using logistic regression. Demographic data was also compared using chi-square analysis.ResultsFrom 2007 to 2017, a total of 17,681 patients received primary total shoulder arthroplasty: 8,846 (50%) received TSA and 8,835 (50%) received RSA. A greater proportion of patients that underwent RSA were female (p < 0.001), over the age of 80 (p < 0.001), and had a higher average Charlson comorbidity index (2.49 vs. 1.99, p < 0.001). At 90-days post-discharge, patients that received RSA were more likely to have prosthetic joint infection (OR 1.66; 95% CI 1.30–2.70), periprosthetic fracture (OR 4.01; 95% CI 3.32–4.87), prosthetic dislocation (OR 2.10; 95% CI 1.57–2.85), and adjacent local scapular/acromion fractures (OR 3.58; 95% CI 2.05–6.71). At 1-year, these patients still had a higher association with periprosthetic fracture (OR 3.66; 95% CI 3.08–4.38), prosthetic dislocation (OR 1.40; 95% CI 1.12–1.75), and local fractures (OR 3.10; 95% CI 2.10–4.73). Patients that underwent TSA were more likely to have prosthetic loosening (OR 0.64; 95% CI 0.45–0.90) and prosthetic stiffness (OR 0.91; 95% CI 0.84–0.99). Additionally, patients that underwent RSA exhibited higher rates of DVT (OR 1.29; 95% CI 1.03–1.62), anemia (OR 1.42; 95% CI 1.25–1.62), acute renal failure (ARF) (OR 1.35; 95% CI 1.13–1.61), pneumonia (OR 1.23; 95% CI 1.02–1.48), and respiratory failure (OR 1.81; 95% CI 1.46–2.26).ConclusionPatients undergoing RSA exhibited higher rates of joint complications at both 90-days and 1-year post-discharge. These patients also experienced higher rates of systemic complications in the 90-day postoperative period, likely due to overall poorer health status.Level of evidenceLevel III; Treatment Study     

Postoperative complications of S2AI versus iliac screw in spinopelvic fixation: a meta-analysis and recent trends review

BACKGROUND CONTEXTIliac screw constructs have been a major advancement in spinopelvic fixation demonstrating superior biomechanics as compared with earlier pelvic spanning constructs. However, drawbacks such as screw site prominence and wound complication have led to the development of a lower profile S2AI iliac screw.PURPOSEIn this study, we aimed to study the differences in complication rates between the traditional iliac and S2AI fixations via a pooled analysis of the available head-to-head comparisons between S2AI and iliac screws. We also aimed to study the iliac screw complications trend over the years particularly with reference to recent modifications in its screw insertion techniques.STUDY DESIGNA meta-analysis with attention to the comparison of patients who underwent iliac screws and S2AI screws was conducted.METHODSThe following databases were utilized: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials database. Using the search terms: iliac, iliac bolts, S2AI, sacral 2 alar iliac, sacral two alar iliac, reviewers independently selected eligible studies, analyzed data and evaluated the risk of bias. Data analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.3 software.RESULTA total of 215 articles were identified, with 6 clinical studies directly comparing outcomes of S2AI pelvic fixation versus iliac screw fixation. A total of 477 patients were included, of which 255 patients (53.5%) underwent S2AI screw and 222 (46.5%) underwent iliac screw fixation. Our pooled analysis favored S2AI screws with regards to postoperative complications of screw prominence (odds ratio [OR]=5.99, 95% confidence interval [CI]=2.168–16.523, p<.001), screw loosening (OR=3.36, 95% CI=1.415–7.998, p=.006), implant breakage (OR=2.30, 95% CI=1.189–4.443, p=.013), and revision surgery (OR=7.84, 95% CI=3.224–19.080, p<.001). Although there was a trend toward more wound complications in conventional iliac screw techniques when compared with S2AI, it was not statistically significant.CONCLUSIONSpinopelvic fixation is an evolving technique. The results from this study showed that S2AI screws with a lower profile have made a significant impact in reducing complications associated with conventional iliac screws. With recent entry point modification and further advancement in the conventional iliac screw technique, such as the “subcrestal iliac screw technique” which reduces the iliac screw complication rate but avoids S2AI-associated SIJ violation. Further studies may be needed to investigate whether these newer iliac screw techniques can narrow the difference in complication rates between iliac screws and S2AI screw techniques.     

Intramedullary Fixation Versus Plate Fixation of Distal Fibular Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials and Observational Studies

Intramedullary fixation (IMF) has been described as a minimally invasive alternative to open reduction and internal fixation for operative treatment of distal fibular fractures in case of compromised soft tissue or severe comorbidities. The objective was to compare postoperative complications and functional outcomes of intramedullary versus plate fixation (PF) in distal fibular fractures. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed. The PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, and CINAHL databases were searched for both randomized controlled trials and observational studies. A total of 26 studies was included, reporting on 1710 patients with a mean age of 51.6 years. Meta-analysis was performed on 8 comparative studies, including subgroup and sensitivity analyses on all outcomes. IMF was associated with significantly fewer wound related complications (odds ratio [OR], 0.11; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.04 to 0.25; p < .01), implant removals (OR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.31 to 0.93; p?=?.03), and nonunions (OR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.15 to 0.62; p < .01). No differences were found regarding malunion (OR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.17 to 1.21; p?=?.11) and the Olerud Molander Ankle Score for long-term functional outcome (mean difference, 9.56; 95% CI, 1.24 to 20.37; p?=?.08). Results of this study apply to a select group of patients, in which the advantages of minimal soft tissue damage by IMF are preferable to optimal fracture reduction by PF. IMF of distal fibular fractures resulted in fewer wound-related complications, implant removals, and nonunions compared with PF. Especially in elderly patients, patients with chronic comorbidity, and patients with compromised soft tissue, IMF may be preferred over PF.     

The Dynamic Martin Screw: an Alternative for Intracapsular Femoral Neck Fractures?

Abstract Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine whether the fixation device known as the dynamic Martin screw (DMS) offers a reasonable alternative for stabilizing intracapsular femoral neck fractures. Materials and Methods: A total of 63 patients with intracapsular femoral neck fractures, stabilized between 1993 and 1997 with the DMS, were followed up in this retrospective study in both 1999 and 2002. The patients were on average 64 years of age, with 30 younger and 33 older than 65. The main outcome measurements consisted of union, non-union, aseptic osteonecrosis of the femoral head and implant failure. Results: We determined an overall osteonecrosis rate of 19% (12 of 63) for our patient group after an observation period on average of 83 months. The osteonecrosis rate for undisplaced fractures was 13.2% (5 of 38), and 28% (7 of 25) for displaced fractures. Non-union occurred in 4.8% (3 of 63) and union in 95.2% (60 of 63) of the patient cases. An implant-associated complication involving deep infection occurred in one case, but no example of implant breakage was recorded. Conclusions: As a method for stabilizing intracapsular femoral neck fractures, the DMS provides treatment results comparable to other sliding hip screws or cannulated screw.     

Factors associated with failure of fixation of Vancouver B fractures around a cemented polished tapered stem: A 5 to 14 year follow up study

AimsThere is increasing evidence for fixation as opposed to revision for Vancouver B fractures around polished taper slip stems, however it is remains unclear whether fixation is associated with stem loosening in the longer term. This study aims to assess survival of plate-fixation of Vancouver-B-fractures around a polished-taper- slip cemented stem and identify factors associated with failure.MethodsRetrospective cohort study assessed 129 consecutive unilateral Vancouver-B-fractures around cemented Exeter stems at a minimum of 5 years following open-reduction-internal-fixation (ORIF) with unilateral non-locked unilateral plating+/-cerclage cables. The primary outcome measure was reoperation for any reason. Kaplan Meier survival analysis was performed.ResultsFractures (B1 n = 31 (24%); B2 n = 91 (71%); and B3 n = 7 (5%)) occurred at median of 6 years (IQR 1.2–9.2) after primary surgery. Mean patient age was 78.2 (SD10.56, range 46–96) and 54 (42.9%) were female. Mean follow up was 8.7 years (SD 2.48, 5.7 to 14.4). Symptomatic femoral stem loosening requiring revision occurred in two B2 fractures of metaphyseal split and short spiral patterns. The most common mode of failure was non-union (n = 7, 5%). Both fixation failure (n = 6/31 Vs n = 3/91 vs n = 0/7, p = 0.008) and reoperation (n = 8/31 vs n = 6/91 vs n = 0/7, p = 0.008) were significantly higher following fixation of B1 fractures compared to B2 and B3 fractures. Overall 5year survival free from reoperation was 88.8% (82.0–94.7 95%CI). B1 fracture types were associated with an increase risk of failure (endpoints fixation failure p = 0.010; and reoperation p = 0.016). Transverse fractures (B1) were associated with a relative risk of reoperation of 4.22 (1.63–10.9 95% CI, p = 0.008).ConclusionFixation of Vancouver-B fractures around cemented Exeter stems, when the bone-cement interface is intact and the fracture is anatomically reducible, had an excellent 5-year survival. Only 2 (1.6%) cases of late femoral stem loosening occurred, however, B1 type transverse fractures were associated with a higher rate of reoperation.     

Sliding hip screws versus cancellous screws for femoral neck fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Purpose

Both sliding hip screws (SHS) and cancellous screws are used in the surgical management of intracapsular femoral neck fracture. However, there is paucity of information as to which is the superior treatment modality. We performed this systematic review and meta-analysis study to compare the clinical outcomes of SHS and cancellous screws for the treatment of femoral neck fractures in adult patients.

Methods

We searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane CENTRAL, up to December 2017. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) directly comparing the clinical outcomes of SHS and cancellous screws for femoral neck fractures were retrieved with no language or publication year restrictions. Data retrieved included operative details, nonunion rate, avascular necrosis, reoperation, infection and mortality, hip pain, functional hip scores, and medical complications. These were pooled as risk ratio or mean difference (MD) with their corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI). Heterogeneity was assessed by Chi-square test.

Results

Ten RCTs involving 1934 patients were included in the final analysis. The pooled estimate showed that the SHS group was associated with more intraoperative blood loss (MD = 110.01 ml, 95% CI [52.42, 167.60], p = 0.00002) than the cancellous screws. There was no significant difference in terms of operative time, postoperative hip function, nonunion, avascular necrosis, reoperation rate, infection, fracture healing, hip pain, medical complications, and mortality rate.

Conclusion

Based on our study, the cancellous screws group was associated with less intraoperative blood loss in comparison with the SHS group. No other significant differences were found between the two interventions.

     

Patients With Un-Displaced Or Displaced Intra Capsular Proximal Femur Fractures Do Not Represent A Different Patient Group And Have Similar Short And Long Term Mortality

BackgroundProximal femur fractures in geriatric patients are associated with substantial mortality. Management of intracapsular proximal femur fractures has been based on age, displacement, cognition, and pre-injury mobility. However, over the last decade, there has been a tendency to offer arthroplasty rather than internal fixation for these patients irrespective of displacement, to allow early mobilisation and negate the higher rate of reoperation due to failed internal fixation. There are no previous investigations analysing whether the severity of fracture displacement is related to different patient characteristics.AimThis study examines whether patients sustaining undisplaced or displaced intracapsular proximal femur fractures represent different patient groups with different pre-injury characteristics and post-operative mortality, irrespective of treatment modality.MethodsA retrospective series of 329 consecutive patients over the age of 55 years who sustained intracapsular proximal femur fractures, who underwent surgical management at a district general hospital over a period of 2 years (2012-2013) were identified using the national hip fracture database. Demographics, American Society of Anaesthesiologist (ASA) grade, pre-injury outdoor mobility status, cognitive status, and admission serum investigations, fracture displacement, type of surgery, and mortality rates at short term (2 years) & long-term (7-9 years) were reviewed.ResultsThere were 109 male and 220 female patients with a minimum follow-up of 7 years. The mean age at surgery was 81.6 years (range 55-103 years). There were 63 (19.1%) undisplaced fractures (Garden 1 &2) and, 265 (80.5%) displaced fractures (Garden 3 & 4).The median survival in this cohort was 2.95 years (95% CI 2.3-3.6). Mortality rates were 77.4% (n=257) at long-term (7-9 years) follow-up. Admission patient characteristics showed no statistically significant difference between displaced and undisplaced fracture groups. This included ASA, pre-operative cognition, and mobility status. Fracture displacement was not an independent predictor of mortality at short or long term.ConclusionIn patients sustaining intracapsular proximal femur fractures, the degree of displacement is not a caveat for a different patient group. Fracture displacement is not predicted by the pre-injury level of function and does not predict short or long-term mortality.