Open reduction and internal fixation for posterior pilon fracture: Transfibular approach versus posterior approach

BackgroundFor posterior pilon fractures, the posterior approach (PA) is widely used but has its limitations. The transfibular approach (TFA) has been adopted to treat posterior malleolar fractures for the advantage of direct visual confirmation of the reduction status intraoperatively, yet the report of its application on posterior pilon fractures is rare. This study aims to compare TFA with PA in terms of their corresponding reduction quality.MethodsClinical data of 85 posterior pilon fracture patients treated via PA (n = 62) or TFA (n = 23) were retrospectively reviewed. Radiographic and clinical assessments, including articular step-off or gap, syndesmosis reduction quality, signs of ankle arthritis, the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot score, visual analogue scale (VAS), ankle stability, and the active range of motion (ROM) of the ankle, were all evaluated by two readers independently.ResultsThe total incidence of step-off or gap ≥ 1 mm was significantly higher in the PA group (35.5%) than in the TFA group (8.7%, p = 0.015). In all the patients, step-off ≥ 1 mm was identified as an independent risk factor for the development of arthritis and a lower AOFAS score (p < 0.001). No significant difference was found in ROM and complication incidence between the two groups. Ankle instability was found in neither group during the follow-up.ConclusionTFA could offer a way to intraoperatively evaluate the reduction status with direct visual confirmation and, thereby, might improve the results of reduction for posterior pilon fractures.Level of evidenceLevel III     

The treatment of a malunited posterior pilon fracture with talar dislocation: A staged surgical treatment protocol

BackgroundMalunited posterior pilon fractures with talus dislocation (mPPFtd) are rare and there are no appropriate treatment strategies. The purpose of this study was to introduce a stepped strategy featuring preliminary soft tissue management according to the Ilizarov principle and delayed open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) through a modified posteromedial approach to overcome rigid soft tissue contracture.MethodFrom February 2015 to August 2021, 12 selected patients with mPPFtd who were treated with the staged protocol (Group A) were retrospectively analysed. The clinical and radiographic outcomes were evaluated using the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot score, the visual analogue scale (VAS) score, and the Burwell-Charnley score. Moreover, this case series was compared with some cases of fresh fracture (Group B) in patients that had the same baseline data from our previous study.ResultsIn Group A, the average length of time between the date of injury and the date of surgery was 4.8 ± 3.3 months. The average time to external fixator distraction, as the first-stage treatment, was 13.4 ± 1.0 days. In the second stage of ORIF, the posterosuperior dislocation of the talus was corrected with osteotomy and leverage manoeuvres. According to the Burwell-Charnley score system, the reduction quality was excellent in 9 cases and good in 3 cases. After a mean follow-up of 3.8 ± 2.1 years, there were no infections, wound healing problems, or nerve injuries in our cohort, and union was observed in all fractures without a loss of reduction. The baseline data of the two groups were not significantly different (p>0.05). The mean AOFAS score in Group A was 85.0 ± 10.5 and that in Group B was 95.4 ± 6.1 (p<0.05). The mean VAS score in Group A was 1.7 ± 1.4 and that in Group B was 0.7 ± 0.9 (p<0.05).ConclusionA staged surgical treatment strategy characterized by soft tissue management will improve the treatment of mPPFtd and produce satisfactory clinical outcomes.Level of evidenceLevel IV, retrospective case series     

High incidence of osteochondral lesions after open reduction and internal fixation of displaced ankle fractures: Medium-term follow-up of 100 cases

BackgroundThe incidence of osteochondral lesions (OCLs) in association with displaced ankle fractures has only been examined in two previous studies. In both studies magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed prior to open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). Because MRI may overdiagnose or overestimate the extent of OCLs in an acute trauma setting the aim of this study was to determine the incidence of OCLs after ORIF of displaced ankle fractures using MRI at medium-term follow-up, and to analyse if the severity of fracture or the clinical outcome correlates with the incidence of OCLs.Patients and methodsFollowing institutional review board approval a total of 100 patients (mean age, 41.3 years; range, 17.9–64.3 years) with a displaced ankle fracture who had undergone ORIF according to the AO principles were included in this study. The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) hindfoot score was used to quantify the clinical outcome and MR images were evaluated for OCLs of the talus and distal tibia after a mean of 34.5 months (range, 17.5–54.1 months).ResultsOCLs were found in 40.4% of the patients. Logistic regression revealed a significant correlation between the severity of fracture and the incidence of OCLs. Patients with a trimalleolar fracture (p = 0.04) or an ankle fracture dislocation (p = 0.003) had a significantly higher risk for developing an OCL compared to those with a type B fracture. Logistic regression also demonstrated a significant correlation between the clinical outcome (AOFAS score) and the incidence of OCLs (p = 0.01). The risk for developing an OCL increases up to 5.6% when the AOFAS score decreases by one point.ConclusionOCLs were frequently found in association with acute ankle fractures at medium-term follow-up, and the severity of fracture was associated with an increased number of OCLs. Considering the disadvantages of MRI including the high cost and limited availability, the results of this study may help to explain why anatomic surgical realignment of displaced ankle fractures may still be associated with poor clinical outcomes.     

Clinical Outcomes for Pilon Variant Posterior Malleolar Fractures: A Multicenter Retrospective Analysis

Currently, there is no consensus on surgical approach for posterior malleolar fracture fragments with significant posteromedial involvement. The Bartonicek type III/Haraguchi type II posterior malleolar morphologies typically involve large posteromedial fragments, behaving like a pilon injury and have been reported as pilon variant fractures. We performed a retrospective chart review at 2 large healthcare institutions, evaluating patients that underwent surgical management of pilon variant posterior malleolar fractures and determining clinical outcomes including: time to union, union rates, soft tissue complications, infection and time to weight bearing. A total of 68 patients were included (51 females, 17 males). A total of 51 direct (19 posterolateral, 31 posteromedial), 6 indirect, and 11 no-fixation approaches were identified. Significantly different time-to-union was found between direct fixation (mean = 85.1 days), indirect fixation (mean = 74 days) and no-fixation (mean = 174.3 days) (p < .001). A posteromedial approach (mean = 63.0 days, SD = 16.6) was associated with significantly shorter time to union when compared to a posterolateral approach (mean = 124.8 days, SD = 59.4; p < .001). Fixation (direct or indirect) was associated with significantly increased likelihood of union of the overall ankle fracture pattern (52/57 = 91%) when compared to no fixation of the posterior malleolar component (9/14 = 64%), p = .01. Patients who underwent direct fixation had significantly lower incidence of neurovascular damage (6%) when compared to patients who underwent indirect fixation (33%) or no-fixation (29%) (p = .02). There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of tendon damage (p = .54), infection rates (p = .45) and time to weight bearing (p = .66). The authors suggest that surgical management and specifically direct approaches have better outcomes in the short-term follow up.     

Outcomes and financial implications of intra-articular distal radius fractures: a comparative study of open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) with volar locking plates versus nonoperative management

Background

To evaluate the functional and radiographic outcomes, as well as the treatment costs, of closed displaced intra-articular distal radius fractures treated with either open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) with volar locking plates or nonoperative treatment with plaster cast immobilisation.

Materials and methods

A total of 60 patients (32 receiving ORIF, 28 receiving nonoperative treatment) with closed intra-articular distal radius fractures were included. The mean age was 52.1 and 57.4, respectively. Functional and radiographic assessments were carried out at 12 months post-injury. Patients’ treatment costs, median salaries and lengths of medical leave were obtained.

Results

DASH and MAYO wrist score in the ORIF group did not differ significantly from those in the nonoperative group. Apart from superior ulnar deviation in the ORIF group (p = 0.0096), differences in the range of motion of the injured wrists were not significant. Similarly, there were no significant differences in grip strength and visual analog scale for pain. Volar tilt (p = 0.0399), radial height (p = 0.0087), radial inclination (p = 0.0051) and articular step-off (p = 0.0002) were all significantly superior in the ORIF group. There was a 37-fold difference in mean treatment costs between ORIF (SGD 7951.23) and nonoperative treatment (SGD 230.52).

Conclusion

Our study shows no difference in overall functional outcomes at 12 months for closed displaced intra-articular distal radius fractures treated with either ORIF with volar locking plates or plaster cast immobilisation, and this is independent of radiographic outcome. A longer follow-up, nevertheless, is needed to determine whether the development of post-traumatic arthritis will have an effect on function. The vast difference in treatment costs should be taken into consideration when deciding on the treatment option.

Level of evidence

Level 3.

     

Meta-Analysis: Functional Outcome of ORIF Versus Primary Subtalar Arthrodesis of Sanders Type II and Type III Calcaneal Fractures

The choice of treatment for Sanders Type II and Type III calcaneal fractures remains controversial with unclear patient functional outcomes. A meta-analysis was done to compare the functional outcome of ORIF vs primary subtalar arthrodesis (PSA) according to American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS) hindfoot-ankle scores. The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library Databases were searched by two independent evaluators. Fourteen studies met the eligible criteria. ORIF of 501 Type II and Type III fractures was compared to primary subtalar arthrodesis treatment of 57 Type II and Type III fractures. AOFAS for a mixed ORIF group of “Type II and III” fractures was 82.16 ± 1.58 at average follow-up of 25.3 months. For a mixed PSA group of “Type II and III” fractures, the AOFAS was 74.22 ± 2.45 at average follow-up of 28.0 months. This showed a difference between ORIF and primary subtalar arthrodesis of 7.94 points (95% confidence interval [CI] = 7.75–7.98; p value .004) favoring ORIF when adjusting for minimally invasive and percutaneous methods. Without adjustment, there was a difference of 6.54 points favoring ORIF (95% CI = 6.22–6.46; p value .017). In conclusion, while high-quality randomized controlled trials comparing ORIF to primary subtalar arthrodesis for Type II and Type III fractures would further elucidate superior treatment outcomes, this meta-analysis of available data shows a tendency for ORIF of Type II and Type III Sanders calcaneal fractures to have a better functional outcome at approximately 2 years postoperatively compared to primary subtalar arthrodesis.     

Outcome evaluation of minimally invasive surgery versus extensile lateral approach in management of displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures: A randomised control trial

BackgroundMinimally invasive surgery has a significant and evolving role in the treatment of DIACFs, but there is limited literature on this topic.ObjectivesTo compare the clinico-radiological outcomes of DIACFs fixed with MIS technique with ORIF.MethodsThis randomised control trial (RCT) included 21 closed Sanders type 2 and 3 DIACFs which were selected from 70 who presented. Extensile lateral approach was used in the ORIF group; while MIS techniques included either percutaneous reduction or small incisions with indirect fragment manipulation.Main Outcome MeasurementAOFAS hindfoot score, pre-operative and postoperative radiology.ResultsThere were 9 fractures in the Extensile group and 12 in the MIS group, with both groups having comparable demography, fracture classification, surgery delay & initial radiology. Bohler′s angle improved after surgery by an average of 18.44 with ORIF and 14.67 with MIS (p = 0.28). Mean AOFAS in the MIS group was 82.58 (66.67% good and 33.33% fair) and was 89.56 (44.44% excellent, 55.56% good, 0 fair/poor) with ORIF (p = 0.034). Two patients who underwent ORIF had a major complication (one deep infection and Sural nerve injury each) while none in the MIS group.ConclusionsMIS methods minimized soft tissue complications and achieved comparable radiological reductions but clinical outcomes were poorer, with percutaneous methods having the worst outcomes.     

Open Reduction and Internal Fixation Better than Percutaneous Plate Osteosynthesis in Distal Tibial Fractures

ABSTRACT

Minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis (MIPPO) was compared with traditional open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) in treating distal tibial fractures. Patients diagnosed with displaced extraarticular distal tibial fractures during October 2005–June 2007 were randomly assigned to a closed (treated using MIPPO) and an open (treated using ORIF) group. Ninety-four patients with fractures were treated and followed up, of which 42 and 52 patients were enrolled in the open and closed groups, respectively. The 94 fracture cases were classified into three types: Type A, 52 (55.3%); Type B, 24 (25.5%); and Type C, 18 (19.1%). The average follow-up time was 15.6 and 16.2 months for the open and closed groups, respectively. In the open group, 35 fractures healed within six months. Delayed union was observed in three fractures and nonunion in four fractures. Two cases had superficial wound infection after operation. No malunion was observed. In the closed group, 47 fractures healed within six months. Delayed union was observed in four fractures. Locking plate was broken nine months after operation in one case. Malunion was observed in five cases: two rotational and three posterior angular deformities. No statistically significant differences were observed in the healing time of Types A and B between the open and closed groups (p > .05). The healing time of Type C in the open group was longer than that in the closed group (p < .05). The first choice for Type C fractures is MIPPO, whereas that for Type A is open reduction.     

Comparison of prone-supine versus supine position for the treatment of pilon fractures via modified posteromedial approach combined with anterolateral approach

BackgroundMost of modified posteromedial approaches require prone position for the treatment of pilon fractures. We describe the technique of modified posteromedial approach under supine position. The goal of the study was to compare the radiographic and clinical outcomes of prone-supine versus supine position for the treatment of pilon fractures via modified posteromedial approach combined with anterolateral approach.MethodsA total of 50 retrospectively consecutive pilon fractures that underwent open reduction internal fixation via modified posteromedial approach combined with anterolateral approach from 2016 to 2019 were reviewed at least a two-year follow up. The positions of patients were divided into two groups: prone-supine versus supine position (26 vs 24, respectively). The operation time, radiographic outcomes including bone union time and ratio of congruent articular reduction were evaluated. The post-operative function was evaluated using the Manchester Oxford score (MOXFQ) and the visual analogue score (VAS). The motion of ankle joint and complications and were also compared.ResultsThe mean follow-up was 42.2(24.7–73.0) months in the prone-supine group and 42.7(37.3–56.5) months in the supine group (P = .87). The mean operation time was 141.9 ± 10.1 min in the prone-supine group and 107.5 ± 18.9 min in the supine group (P = .00). There was no significant difference in the bone union time and ratio of congruent articular reduction between the two groups. There was no significant difference in the final MOXFQ score, VAS score, and the mean range of ankle motion between the two groups (P > .05). The total incidence of complications was 11.5% in the prone-supine group and 16.6% in the supine group (P = .66).ConclusionThe patient in the prone-supine position versus supine position for pilon fractures via modified posteromedial approach combined with anterolateral approach contributed comparable quality of reduction, bone union time functional outcomes and complications. The supine technique was significantly shorter in terms of operation time.     

Osteonecrosis of the distal tibia after pilon fractures

BackgroundPilon fractures are devastating injuries with high complication rates. Osteonecrosis has been previously described after Weber C fracture-dislocations but has not been reported following fixation of pilon fractures.MethodsAll AO/OTA 43-C pilon fractures from 2007 to 2018 were reviewed. Injury factors and demographics were recorded. Computed tomography (CT) scans of the fracture pattern were analyzed to determine risk factors for ON.Results71 pilon fractures in 69 patients were included. Mean follow-up was 21.6 months. 18 patients demonstrated ON at a mean 7.3 months’ post-injury. Regression analysis demonstrated no differences between cohorts with respect to smoking status, open injury, or diabetic status. ON was associated with small anterolateral fragment less than 2.0 cm² (OR = 19.47, p = 0.012), higher comminution (OR = 3.00, p = 0.005), use of calcium phosphate bone substitute (OR = 20.72, p = 0.013).ConclusionsON of the distal tibia was not associated with patient factors but was associated with fracture characteristics.     

Percutaneous Prodding Reduction and K-Wire Fixation Via Sinus Tarsi Approach Versus ORIF for Sanders Type III Calcaneal Fractures: A Prospective Case-Controlled Trial

We conducted a prospective randomized controlled trial to compare the radiological and clinical outcomes of Sanders type III calcaneal fractures treated with percutaneous prodding reduction and K-wire fixation via a sinus tarsi approach (PPRKF) versus open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). Fifty-one patients with closed, unilateral, Sanders type III calcaneal fractures were randomly assigned to the PPRKF group (n = 26) or the ORIF group (n = 25). The clinical outcomes evaluated were time to surgery, blood loss, operative time, hospital stay, wound healing time, wound complications, and Maryland foot score. Radiological results were evaluated on lateral and axial X-rays and computed tomography images and included Böhler's angle, Gissane's angle, and calcaneal width. Compared with the ORIF group, the PPRKF group had shorter time to surgery, shorter operative time, less blood loss, shorter hospital stay, shorter wound healing time, and fewer wound complications (p < .001). The postoperative Böhler's angle, Gissane's angle, and calcaneal width in both groups were significantly better than those measured preoperatively (p < .001) and did not differ between the PPRKF group and ORIF group (p> .05). Regarding clinical results, there was no significant difference in Maryland foot score between the two groups at 12 months after surgery (p > .05). Both PPRKF and ORIF can result in satisfactory clinical function. PPRKF is superior to ORIF in reducing the time to surgery, operative time, blood loss, hospital stay, wound healing time, and wound complications.     

A comparative study of three different approaches in treatment of talar neck fractures

PurposeThe primary objective of this study was to observe and compare the radiographic and clinical outcomes among three different approaches which are anteromedial, anterolateral and combined approach in patients of talar neck fractures. The secondary objective was to observe various complications.Material and methodA total of 30 patients underwent open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) from September 2018 to march 2020 were selected retrospectively. 10 patients were there in each group. Talar neck fractures were classified according to Hawkins classification. All patients underwent ORIF with 4 mm Herbert screws. The follow-up examination included radiological evaluation, clinical and functional outcomes according to American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society hind-foot score (AOFAS).Results30 patients were followed up for an average of 20.85 months (range 16–24). The mean time to bony union was 17.25 weeks, 17.35 weeks and 15.92 weeks in groups operated with anteromedial approach, anterolateral approach and combined approach respectively. The mean AOFAS hind-foot score was 76.34, 77.16 and 78.34 at 18th month follow-up in all three groups respectively. In each group, 1 patient had deep wound infection and 2 patients had superficial wound infection. Subtalar arthritis was the most common complication.ConclusionThere is no significant difference between the three groups in terms of AOFAS hind-foot score, further combined approach provides better visualization of talus fractures and early bony union but it takes longer duration of surgery with increased post-operative complications in comparison with other two groups.     

Outcomes after ORIF of Bicondylar Schatzker VI (AO type C) Tibial Plateau Fractures in an Elderly Population

BackgroundThe surgical management of bicondylar tibial plateau (BTP) fractures in elderly patients aims to restore knee stability while minimizing soft tissue complications. The purpose of this study was to compare injury characteristics and surgical outcomes after ORIF of BTP fractures (AO/OTA 41-C (Schatzker VI)) in young (< 50 years) versus elderly (> 65 years) patients.MethodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from two American College of Surgeons (ACS) level I trauma centers. Inclusion criteria were: (1) age 18 years or older, (2) bicondylar tibial plateau fracture (AO/OTA 41-C or Schatzker VI), (3) treatment with ORIF, and (4) minimum of 6 months follow-up. Patients between 50 and 65 years of age were excluded. Data collection was performed by reviewing electronic medical records, operative reports, and radiology reports.ResultsWe identified 323 patients (61% male) with 327 BTP fractures and a median follow-up of 685 days. There were 230 young patients (71%) < 50 years and 93 elderly patients (29%) >6 5 years at time of presentation. Elderly patients were significantly more likely to have a low energy mechanism of injury (44.6 vs. 16.2%, p < 0.001), and present with diabetes (19.4 vs. 4.4%, p < 0.001) or coronary artery disease (12.9 vs. 1.3%, p < 0.001). Elderly patients were also significantly less likely to undergo staged management with initial knee-spanning external fixation followed by delayed ORIF (19.2 vs. 33.9%, p = 0.008). Elderly patients had a lower arc of motion at final follow-up (105 vs. 113°, p < 0.001) and reduced PROMIS-10 function scores (43.8 vs. 49.8, p = 0.013). No differences were observed in rates of superficial infection, deep infection, reoperation, or EQ-5D scores between age groups.ConclusionsThis is the largest study to compare injury characteristics and outcomes after ORIF of BTP fractures according to age. Elderly patients (age > 65 years) sustained BTP fractures by lower energy mechanisms than their younger counterparts with similar fracture patterns and were often managed with ORIF. The results of this study suggest that ORIF of BTP fractures in elderly patients is associated with similar complication rates and outcomes as in younger patients despite higher comorbidities and poorer bone quality in the elderly population.     

A comparative evaluation of the time to frame removal for tibia fractures treated with hexapod and Ilizarov circular frames

IntroductionTraditional Ilizarov and hexapod frames have different biomechanical properties and there is limited literature regarding their effect on time to fracture union or time to frame removal.MethodsTibial fractures managed with a circular frame at a tertiary limb reconstruction referral centre between 2011 and 2018 were retrospectively identified from a prospectively maintained database. They were classified into three treatment groups; Ilizarov style, Taylor Spatial Frame (TSF) and TrueLok Hex (TL-Hex). Data were extracted from electronic patient records and digital radiographs. The primary outcome was time to frame removal, which was seen as an indicator of clinical and radiological fracture union. Odds ratios were calculated with the clinical significance set at 30 days.Results274 patients (median age 49 years, 36% female) were included in the analysis. 8.4% Ilizarov, 10.5% TSF and 13.5% TL-Hex frames required further surgery to aid fracture healing (p = 0.38). 30% of patients had open fractures. Median time to removal for Ilizarov, TSF & TL Hex frames was 167, 198 and 185 days respectively. There was a significant difference between Ilizarov and hexapod frames. Both TSF (OR 2.2, p<0.003) and TL-Hex (OR 1.8, p<0.04) had a significantly increased time to removal of 30 days or more compared with Ilizarov frames.The time to frame removal in metaphyseal fractures was significantly shorter for Ilizarov frame fixation than hexapod frames (p = 0.04). Open fractures were significantly more likely to require at least 30 days extra time to removal than closed fractures (OR 3.3, p<0.001). There was no significant difference in the time to frame removal between fracture location, age or sex.ConclusionIlizarov frames have demonstrated a reduced time to frame removal in the management of tibial fractures than hexapod frames. Differences in the time to frame removal, an indicator of time to fracture union, may be due to the different mechanical properties of the frame, or early disruption of the fracture haematoma through secondary frame manipulation and fracture reduction, increased proportion of metaphyseal fractures treated with Ilizarov, or patient selection. The healing time was comparable across the tibia. Pooled meta-analyses may be able to further quantify these associations.     

Gait analysis and clinical outcome in patients after pilon fracture surgery

BackgroundIn this study kinematic parameters, radiographic findings and PROM in pilon fractures after operative treatment were compared with healthy subjects.Methods16 patients treated with osteosynthesis after pilon fracture underwent kinematic analysis with the OFM. Fractures were evaluated for post-operative step-off and gap on CT-scans and PROM were collected. Results were compared to 10 healthy persons.ResultsRange of motion (ROM) crural was lower in the flexion/extension for pilon fractures (10.03 vs. 13.15, p = 0.017). The ROM in the inversion/eversion was low, but ROM in the abduction/adduction was higher. Correlations were found between flexion/extension and AO-classification (r = ?0.357 p < 0.05), PROM score of the AOFAS (r = 0.445 p < 0.01), post-operative gap and step-off in the tibia plafond.ConclusionPilon fractures showed decreased ROM between the hindfoot and tibia in the sagittal and transverse plane, but increased ROM in the frontal plane during push-off phase as compensatory kinetics. ROM showed significant correlations with PROM and intra-articular step-off and gap in the tibia plafond.     

Humeral shaft fractures: national trends in management

Background

The incidence of humeral shaft fractures has been increasing over time. This represents a growing public health concern in a climate of cost containment. The purpose of this study is to analyze national trends in surgical management of humeral shaft fractures and determine factors predictive of surgical intervention.

Materials and methods

Humeral shaft fractures were identified by the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification codes 812.21 and 812.31 in the United States Nationwide Inpatient Sample from 2002 to 2011. Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) was identified by code 79.31 (ORIF, humerus). Other case codes analyzed were 79.01 (closed reduction without internal fixation), 79.11 (closed reduction with internal fixation), and 79.21 (open reduction without internal fixation). Multivariate regression analysis was utilized to determine predictive factors for utilization of ORIF.

Results

27,908 humeral shaft fractures were identified. Utilization of ORIF increased from 47.2% of humeral shaft fractures in 2002 to 60.3% in 2011. Demographically, patients who underwent ORIF were younger (51.5 versus 59.7 years, p < 0.001; odds ratio 0.87 per decade of age). There were modest increases in ORIF usage with private insurance, open fracture, and hospital size, which persisted with multivariate regression analysis. Surprisingly, there was a tendency to shift from a slight increase in ORIF for males with the bivariate case to a slight preference for females in the multivariate case.

Conclusion

Utilization of ORIF for humeral shaft fractures has been steadily increasing with time. Surgical intervention was more common with younger patients, female gender, private insurance, and larger hospital size. The increasing incidence of surgical management for humeral shaft fractures may represent a public health burden given the historical success of non-operative management.

Level of evidence

IV.

     

Risk factors for symptomatic venous thromboembolism following surgery for closed ankle fractures: A case-control study

BackgroundWe analyzed risk factors for venous thromboembolism (VTE) within 6 months after surgery for closed ankle fractures.MethodsThis was a case-control study based on data from chart review in a cohort of patients having open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) for closed ankle fractures in two large general hospitals 2009–2011. Cases with symptomatic VTE (pulmonary embolism or deep venous thrombosis) were identified in the cohort, and additional cases of VTE were identified by computerized search of discharge diagnoses in the same hospitals in 2004–2008 and 2012–2016. In total, we identified 60 cases with VTE and compared with 240 randomly selected controls among 998 patients without VTE in the cohort. Risk factors were assessed using logistic regression analysis.ResultsAmong cases, 27 (45%) had pulmonary embolism, 33 (55%) deep venous thrombosis. Those with VTE were older, had higher BMI, had more often a family history of VTE, and more often had antibiotic prophylaxis during surgery than controls. In multivariable logistic regression analysis age/10 (OR 25.75, 95%CI 3.52–188.44, p = 0.001), (age/10)² (OR 0.77, 95%CI 0.65–0.93, p = 0.005), BMI (1.15 per kg/m², 95%CI 1.07–1.24, p < 0.001) and Charlson comorbidity index ≥2 vs.0 (OR 0.27, 95%CI 0.08–0.92, p = 0.036) and 1 vs. 0 (OR 0.27, 95%CI 0.09–0.86, p = 0.026) were associated with VTE within 6 months of surgery.ConclusionsThe odds of symptomatic VTE within 6 months of ORIF increased with increasing age and BMI, but were lower with increasing comorbidity.     

Locked intramedullary nailing provides superior functional outcomes and lower complication rates than plate fixation of distal fibula fractures. A systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies

PurposeThis study aims to provide an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies on the outcomes and complications of locked IMNs in comparison to ORIF using plates and screws, while avoiding limitations of similar published reviews.MethodsFollowing the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, two independent team members electronically searched MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, Google Scholar, SCOPUS, and Cochrane databases throughout May 2021 using the following keywords with their synonyms: “Ankle fracture fixation” AND “Open reduction and internal fixation”, “locked intramedullary nail”, or “complications”. The primary outcomes were (1) functional outcomes, (2) complications, and (3) reoperation, while the secondary outcomes were: (1) union rate, and (2) cost. Inclusion criteria: comparative studies on outcomes and complications of plate open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) vs. locked intramedullary nailing (IMN) of ankle fractures reporting at least one of the following parameters: functional outcomes, complications (infection, dehiscence, reoperation etc.), union, and cost. Studies reporting on non-locked intramedullary fibular nails were also excluded.ResultsAfter the removal of duplicates, a total of 1461 studies were identified. After screening those records, 63 studies remained for full-text assessment. Out of those, four comparative studies with a total of 262 ankle fractures met the inclusion criteria for this meta-analysis. The mean 12 months postoperative Olerud and Molander Ankle Scores (OMAS) were reported by two studies, with a statistically significant difference in favor of IMNs (MD= 6.72, CI: 3.77–9.67, p <0.001, I²= 94%). In the ORIF group, the overall complication rate was 39/134 (29.1%) vs. 10/128 (7.8%) in the IMN group, with a statistically significant difference in favor of the IMN group (RR=3.23, CI:1.71–6.11, p<0.001, I²=34%). In the ORIF group, the overall infection rate was 11/134 (8.2%), while there were no infections in the IMN group, with a statistically significant difference in favor of the IMN group (RR=8.05, CI:1.51–42.82, p=0.01, I²=0%). In the ORIF group, the overall reoperation rate was 10/134 (7.5%) while the overall reoperation rate was 6/128 (4.7%) in the IMN group, with no statistically significant difference between groups (RR=1.49, CI: 0.60–3.70, p = 0.39, I²=0%).ConclusionLocked intramedullary nail fixation of distal fibula fractures could provide superior functional outcomes and lower complication rates in comparison to open reduction and plate fixation. Despite the high incidence of ankle fractures, the number of high-quality comparative studies remains limited in literature, especially on newer locked fibular nails, and large multicentric clinical trials are required before recommending locked IMNs as the new standard of care in distal fibula fractures.     

Is retrograde nailing superior to lateral locked plating for complete articular distal femur fractures?

IntroductionNonunion rates for distal femur fractures treated with lateral locked plating (LLP) remains as high as 18–22% despite significant advances with implant design and construct modulation. However, whether treatment of distal femur fractures with rIMN has improved outcomes compared to LLP has not been well characterized. The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes of complete articular distal femur fractures (AO/OTA 33-C) treated with either LLP or rIMN.Methods106 distal femur fractures in 106 patients between January 2014 and January 2018 were identified. Medical records were reviewed to collect patient age, gender, body mass index, sagittal and coronal plane alignment on immediate postoperative radiographs, time to union, incidence of nonunion, and incidence of secondary operative procedures for repair of a nonunion.ResultsOf 106 patients, 50 underwent rIMN and 56 underwent LLP. The mean age at the time of injury was 51 years (21 to 86 years) and there were 55 males. Average coronal alignment of 83.7° of anatomic lateral distal femoral angle (aLDFA) and sagittal alignment of <1° of apex anterior angulation in the rIMN group. In the LLP group there was an average of 87.9° of aLDFA and 1.9° of apex anterior angulation (p = .005 and p = .36). Average time to union in the rIMN group was 6 months and 6.6 months in the LLP group (p = .52). Incidence of nonunion in the rIMN group was 11.8% and 27.5% in the LLP group (p = .008). There were 8 secondary procedures for nonunion in the rIMN group and 18 in the LLP group (p = .43).ConclusionsOur results demonstrated a higher nonunion rate and coronal plane malalignment with LLP compared to rIMN. While prospective data is required, rIMN does appear to be an appropriate treatment for complete articular distal femur fractures with a potentially decreased rate of nonunion .     

Tibial shaft fractures in the adolescents: treatment outcomes and the risk factors for complications

Background: Tibial shaft fractures are common injuries in the adolescent age group. The optimal method of treatment in this age group is still controversial. It relies on several factors including patient's age, fracture pattern, fracture location, and the condition of the soft tissue envelope. The purpose of this study was to report the clinical and radiographic outcomes of adolescent tibial shaft fractures treatment at a level-I trauma center.Methods: This retrospective study reviewed consecutive patients between 10 and 18 years of age who suffered from tibial shaft fractures between 2009 and 2018 at a level-I trauma center. Outcomes of interest were the successful fracture union (primary outcome) as evaluated by the Radiographic Union Scale in Tibial fractures (RUST) and the complications (secondary outcomes).Results: Fifty-two consecutive adolescent patients treated for tibial shaft fractures using elastic stable intramedullary nails (ESIN), interlocking nails, plates and screws, external fixators, and casts were included in the study. The mean follow-up period was 27.4 months. There was no statistically significant difference in the union rate and time to fracture union between the different treatment methods. Subject weight, fracture type, and method of treatment were significant predictors for the RUST scores at 12 weeks post-operative. Adolescents with heavier bodyweight correlated with lower RUST scores (p<0.001). Open fractures were associated with significantly longer time to union (p<0.001) and lower RUST scores (p<0.001) compared to closed fractures. The patients treated with interlocking nailing showed higher RUST scores than the casting treatment group (p = 0.01). There were no statistically significant differences in complication rates between the fixation methods. Union time was significantly longer with complications than without complications (p = 0.01). Open fractures had higher complication rates compared to closed fractures. In the multivariate logistic model, patients with open fracture were 5.5 times more likely to have complications (OR=5.46; p = 0.04).Conclusion: Tibial shaft fractures in adolescents can be treated with several methods including ESIN, interlocking nail, plate and screws, external fixation, and casting. All are valid treatments for adolescent tibial shaft fractures and can achieve favorable outcomes. No single treatment method applies to all patients. Each method has advantages, disadvantages, and specific indications.