The COVID-19 pandemic and associated rise in pediatric firearm injuries: A multi-institutional study

BackgroundFirearm sales in the United States (U.S.) markedly increased during the COVID-19 pandemic. Our objective was to determine if firearm injuries in children were associated with stay-at-home orders (SHO) during the COVID-19 pandemic. We hypothesized there would be an increase in pediatric firearm injuries during SHO.MethodsThis was a multi institutional, retrospective study of institutional trauma registries. Patients <18 years with traumatic injuries meeting National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) criteria were included. A “COVID” cohort, defined as time from initiation of state SHO through September 30, 2020 was compared to “Historical” controls from an averaged period of corresponding dates in 2016–2019. An interrupted time series analysis (ITSA) was utilized to evaluate the association of the U.S. declaration of a national state of emergency with pediatric firearm injuries.ResultsNine Level I pediatric trauma centers were included, contributing 48,111 pediatric trauma patients, of which 1,090 patients (2.3%) suffered firearm injuries. There was a significant increase in the proportion of firearm injuries in the COVID cohort (COVID 3.04% vs. Historical 1.83%; p < 0.001). There was an increased cumulative burden of firearm injuries in 2020 compared to a historical average. ITSA showed an 87% increase in the observed rate of firearm injuries above expected after the declaration of a nationwide emergency (p < 0.001).ConclusionThe proportion of firearm injuries affecting children increased during the COVID-19 pandemic. The pandemic was associated with an increase in pediatric firearm injuries above expected rates based on historical patterns.     

Firearm injury survival is only the beginning: The impact of socioeconomic factors on unplanned readmission after injury

BackgroundFirearm trauma remain a national crisis disproportionally impacting minority populations in the United States. Risk factors leading to unplanned readmission after firearm injury remain unclear. We hypothesized that socioeconomic factors have a major impact on unplanned readmission following assault-related firearm injury.MethodsThe 2016–2019 Nationwide Readmission Database of the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project was used to identify hospital admissions in those aged >14 years with assault-related firearm injury. Multivariable analysis assessed factors associated with unplanned 90-day readmission.ResultsOver 4 years, 20,666 assault-related firearm injury admissions were identified that resulted in 2,033 injuries with subsequent 90-day unplanned readmission. Those with readmissions tended to be older (31.9 vs 30.3 years), had a drug or alcohol diagnosis at primary hospitalization (27.1% vs 24.1%), and had longer hospital stays at primary hospitalization (15.5 vs 8.1 days) [all P<0.05]. The mortality rate in the primary hospitalization was 4.5%. Primary readmission diagnoses included: complications (29.6%), infection (14.5%), mental health (4.4%), trauma (15.6%), and chronic disease (30.6%). Over half of the patients readmitted with a trauma diagnosis were coded as new trauma encounters. 10.3% of readmission diagnoses included an additional ‘initial’ firearm injury diagnosis. Independent predictors of 90-day unplanned readmission were public insurance (aOR 1.21, P = 0.008), lowest income quartile (aOR 1.23, P = 0.048), living in a larger urban region (aOR 1.49, P = 0.01), discharge requiring additional care (aOR 1.61, P < 0.001), and discharge against medical advice (aOR 2.39, P < 0.001).ConclusionsHere we present socioeconomic risk factors for unplanned readmission after assault-related firearm injury. Better understanding of this population can lead to improved outcomes, decreased readmissions, and decreased financial burden on hospitals and patients. Hospital-based violence intervention programs may use this to target mitigating intervention programs in this population.     

The hidden mortality of pediatric firearm violence

IntroductionFirearms and motor vehicle collisions (MVC) are leading causes of mortality in children. We hypothesized that firearm injuries would have a higher mortality than MVCs in children and a higher level of resource utilizationMethodsTrauma patients <18 years old at a Level 1 pediatric trauma center sustaining gunshot wounds (GSW) or MVCs 2009–2019 were included. The primary outcome was mortality. The secondary outcome was immediate surgery. The California Department of Public Health's Overall Injury Surveillance tool was queried for patients <18 with GSW or MVC 2006–2015 to compare statewide case fatality rates (CFRs), and analyze proportions of GSWs by intent: assault, self-inflicted, and unintentional.ResultsOf 13,840 pediatric trauma patients at our institution, 295 GSWs (2.1%) and 4467 MVCs (32.3%) were included. Mortality was higher for GSWs (7.5% vs. 0.8%, p<0.0001). GSW patients were more likely to require immediate surgery (34.4% vs. 11.2%, p<0.0001). On multivariable analysis, GSW patients were 7.8-times more likely to die than MVC patients (OR 7.83, 95% CI 3.68–16.66, p<0.0001), adjusted for age, sex, and injury severity. Statewide, there were 10,790 pediatric GSWs with 1586 deaths (CFR 14.7%) vs. 710 deaths in 261,363 children in MVCs (CFR 0.3%, p<0.0001). The GSW CFR rose (13.4% to 16.5%, p = 0.05) while the MVC CFR decreased (0.5% to 0.2%, p<0.0001) in 2015 vs. 2006.ConclusionFirearm violence in pediatric patients is significantly more lethal than MVCs and is resource intensive. The case fatality rate for pediatric firearm violence is rising. Resources must be directed at preventing pediatric firearm injuries.Level of evidencePrognosis study, Level II     

COVID-19 Pandemic Effects on the Epidemiology and Mortality of Pediatric Firearm Injuries; A Single Center Study

BackgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic has been associated with increased firearm injuries amongst adults, though the pandemic's effect on children is less clearly understood.MethodsThis cross-sectional study was performed at a Level 1 Pediatric Trauma Center and included youths 0–19 years. The trauma registry was retrospectively queried for firearm injuries occurring pre-COVID-19 pandemic (March 2015-February 2020). Baseline data was compared to prospectively collected data occurring during the COVID-19 pandemic (March 2020-March 2022). Fischer's exact, Pearson's Chi-square and/or correlation analysis was used to compare pre and post-COVID-19 firearm injury rates and intent, victim demographics and disposition. Temporal relationships between firearm injury rates and local COVID-19 death rates were also described.Results413 pre-COVID-19 firearm injuries were compared to 259 pandemic firearm injuries. Victims were mostly Black males with a mean age of 13.4 years. Compared to the 5 years pre-pandemic, monthly firearm injury rates increased 51.5% (6.8 vs 10.3 shootings/month), including a significant increase (p = 0.04) in firearm assaults/homicides and a relative decrease in unintentional shootings. Deaths increased 29%, and there were significantly fewer ED discharges and more admissions to OR and/or PICU (p = 0.005). There was a significant increase in Black victims (p = 0.01) and those having Medicaid or self-pay (p<0.001). Firearm injury spikes were noted during or within the 3 months following surges in local COVID-19 death rates.ConclusionsThe COVID-19 pandemic was associated with an increase in the frequency and mortality of pediatric firearm injuries, particularly assaults amongst Black children following surges in COVID death rates. Increased violence-intervention services are needed, particularly amongst marginalized communities.Level of evidenceThis is a prognostic study, evaluating the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on pediatric firearm injuries, including victim demographics, injury intent and mortality. This study is retrospective and observational, making it Oxford Level III evidence.     

Disparities in detection of suspected child abuse

BackgroundChild abuse is a significant cause of injury and death among children, but accurate identification is often challenging. This study aims to assess whether racial disparities exist in the identification of child abuse.MethodsThe 2010–2014 and 2016–2017 National Trauma Data Bank was queried for trauma patients ages 1–17. Using ICD-9CM and ICD-10CM codes, children with injuries consistent with child abuse were identified and analyzed by race.ResultsBetween 2010–2014 and 2016–2017, 798,353 patients were included in NTDB. Suspected child abuse victims (SCA) accounted for 7903 (1%) patients. Of these, 51% were White, 33% Black, 1% Asian, 0.3% Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander, 2% American Indian, and 12% other race. Black patients were disproportionately overrepresented, composing 12% of the US population, but 33% of SCA patients (p < 0.001). Although White SCA patients were more severely injured (ISS 16–24: 20% vs 16%, p < 0.01) and had higher in-hospital mortality (9% vs. 6%, p = 0.01), Black SCA patients were hospitalized longer (7.2 ± 31.4 vs. 6.2 ± 9.9 days, p < 0.01) despite controlling for ISS (1–15: 4. 5.7 ± 35.7 vs. 4.2 ± 6.2 days, p < 0.01). In multivariate regression, Black children continued to have longer lengths of stay despite controlling for ISS and insurance type.ConclusionsUtilizing a nationally representative dataset, Black children were disproportionately identified as potential victims of abuse. They were also subjected to longer hospitalizations, despite milder injuries. Further studies are needed to better understand the etiology of the observed trends and whether they reflect potential underlying unconscious or conscious biases of mandated reporters.Type of studyTreatment study.Level of evidenceIII.     

Pediatric cerebrovascular trauma: Incidence,management, and outcomes

BackgroundPediatric cerebrovascular trauma (CVT) is rare. There is an increasing use of endovascular management in vascular trauma. We studied the incidence, management, and outcomes of CVT in the pediatric population using the NTDB (National Trauma Data Bank).MethodsThe NTDB was queried for CVT in patients less than 18 years of age over a recent three-year period (2017–2019). Demographics, injury mechanism, type and location, Glasgow Coma Score (GCS), length of stay (LOS), surgical approach (open vs endovascular), and morbidity/mortality were evaluated. Statistical analysis included χ² and student's t-tests or Fisher's exact tests where appropriate.ResultsOf 386,918 pediatric trauma cases, 1536 (0.4%) suffered 1821 CVT. Blunt trauma accounted for 69.3%. Patients were predominantly male (65.4%) and white (57.5%), with an mean age of 14 years. There were 998 (55%) carotid artery injuries, including 846 common/internal carotid and 145 external carotid. Other vessel injuries included 141 (11%) intracranial carotid, 571 (31%) vertebral artery and 252 (14%) jugular vein. Mean number of vessels injured was 1.2. Motor vehicle trauma was most common (49.3%) followed by firearm injury (21%). The mean GCS was 11, and mean total LOS was 11.3 days. Majority of interventions were performed in an open fashion (65.7%), whereas 29.7% were performed endovascularly. Stroke rate was 3.1%. Patients with multiple vascular injuries had an overall mortality of 29% (p<0.0001).ConclusionWhile not accorded as much importance as blunt injury, penetrating CVT comprises of 30% of injuries. Nearly 1/3rd of all cases needing surgical intervention were managed with endovascular techniques.Level of evidenceIII.     

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on pediatric firearm injuries in Colorado

BackgroundIn 2019 firearm injuries surpassed automobile-related injuries as the leading cause of pediatric death in Colorado. In the spring of 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic led to community-level social, economic, and health impacts as well as changes to injury epidemiology. Thus, we sought to determine the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on pediatric firearm injuries in Colorado.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective review of pediatric firearm injured patients (≤ 18-years-old) evaluated at three trauma centers in Colorado from 2018–2021. Patients were stratified into two groups based on the time of their firearm injury: pre- COVID injuries and post- COVID injuries. Group differences were examined using t-tests for continuous variables and Chi Squared or Fisher's exact tests for categorical variables.ResultsOverall, 343 firearm injuries occurred during the study period. There was a significant increase in firearm injuries as a proportion of overall pediatric ED trauma evaluations following the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic (pre COVID: 5.18/100 trauma evaluations; post COVID: 8.61/100 trauma evaluations, p<0.0001). Assaults were the most common injury intent seen both pre and post COVID (70.3% vs. 56.7%, respectively); however, unintentional injuries increased significantly from 10.3% to 22.5% (p = 0.004) following the onset of the pandemic. Additionally, the COVID-19 pandemic was associated with a 177% increase in unintentional injuries in adolescents.ConclusionPediatric firearm injuries, particularly unintentional injuries, increased significantly in Colorado following the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. The substantial increase in unintentional injuries among adolescents highlights the necessity of multi-disciplinary approaches to limit or regulate their access to firearms.Level of EvidenceLevel III.Study TypeRetrospective.     

A comparison between non-powder gun and powder-gun injuries in a young pediatric population

IntroductionNon-powder guns (NPG) are viewed as toys for children by the general public. Literature on firearm injuries in the pediatric population is increasing, however there are still large gaps in the published literature regarding NPG. We intended to identify and compare the epidemiology, circumstances of injury and outcomes of children with NPG versus powder-gun injuries (GSW).Patients and methodsWe performed a 6-year retrospective analysis of children 0–14 years old treated for NPG and GSW injuries at our level one pediatric trauma center. Mann-Whitney U test and Pearson’s X² were used to compare continuous and categorical variables, respectively.ResultsThere were 43 NPG and 112 GSWs. Patients were predominantly male (36 children; 84%) NPG vs. 92 children; 82% GSW) with a median age in both groups of 11 years. Analysis of residential zip codes showed that 74% (32 children) NPG injuries and 85% (95 children) GSW lived in regions with higher poverty than the national level. Children with NPG injuries were more likely to be Caucasian (24 children; 56%) and to have suffered an unintentional injury (36 children; 84%), while children with GSW were African-American (80 children; 71%; p = 0.0002) and victims of assault (50 children; 45%; p < 0.0001). When compared with NPG, children with GSW had more severe injuries, longer hospital stays, and higher overall mortality. There were no significant differences in rate of emergent OR intervention and ED mortality between the two groups.ConclusionOur results highlight two important findings. First, NPG injuries were accidental and thus preventable with improved legislation and public education. Second, health disparities related to gun violence among African-Americans are prevalent even in early childhood and prevention efforts should include this younger population.     

Early results of low-velocity ballistic femoral shaft fractures

IntroductionBallistic femur fractures are a common injury treated at United States civilian trauma centers. This study investigates the outcomes of these injuries by comparing the rates of infection, nonunion, secondary operations, and associated injuries from low-velocity gunshot (GSW) injuries with fractures sustained by blunt trauma.MethodsA retrospective cohort comparative study was performed at a Level 1 trauma center. 345 patients with closed blunt or GSW femoral shaft fractures over 10 years were included. All were treated with intramedullary nail fixation. Superficial and deep infection, vascular injury, compartment syndrome, nonunion, and secondary operations were identified.Results148 patients in the GSW group and 197 patients in the blunt trauma group had overall mean age 33.5 years and 80% were male. Deep infection rates were similar There were no nonunions in the GSW group, contrasted with 8 (4.4%) nonunions in the blunt trauma group (p = 0.02). The rate of compartment syndrome was higher in the GSW group (6.1% vs 0, p < 0.001). Arterial injury occurred in 9% following GSW (vs 0, p < 0.001). Overall, secondary unplanned procedure rates were the same: 8.1% for both groups.DiscussionBallistic femoral shaft fractures are often equated with open injuries; however, rates of infection and secondary operations closely mirror that of closed injuries resulting from blunt force trauma. Nonunions may be more common after blunt injury, and compartment syndrome and arterial injury are substantially more common following GSW, warranting careful clinical assessment.Level of evidencePrognostic, level III.     

Increased morbidity associated with weekend paediatric road traffic injuries: 10-year analysis of trauma registry data

BackgroundRoad traffic injuries (RTIs) are a significant cause of paediatric morbidity and mortality worldwide, with a disproportionate number of these injuries occurring in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Adult data from LMICs suggest that weekends are particularly high-risk for RTIs, but whether children are at increased risk of RTI on weekends has not previously been investigated in any setting. This study sought to assess patterns in paediatric RTI presentations using hospital-based trauma surveillance data in Cape Town, South Africa.MethodsData was analysed from Childsafe South Africa's prospectively collected trauma registry for injured children below 13 years of age presenting to a tertiary paediatric referral Trauma Department between 2004 and 2013.ResultsDuring the 10-year study period, a total of 71,180 patients presented with traumatic injuries, of which 8,815 (12.4%) resulted from RTIs. RTI patients had a mean age of 5.2 ± 3.6 years, and were predominantly males and pedestrians. RTIs were more common on weekends than weekdays (2.98 vs. 2.19 patients/day, p < 0.001), representing a greater proportion of daily all-cause trauma (15.5% vs. 11.2%, p < 0.001). Moreover, weekend RTI patients sustained more severe injuries than on weekdays, and compared to weekend all-cause trauma patients (injury score 1.66 vs. 1.46 and 1.43, both p < 0.001). RTI patients were more likely to require admission to both the trauma ward (1.14 vs. 0.79 patients/day, p < 0.001) and the PICU (0.10 vs. 0.07 patients/day, p < 0.05) on weekends than on weekdays. Weekend RTI patients most frequently required admission to the trauma ward (p < 0.001) and the PICU (p < 0.05) during the last annual quarter.ConclusionsIn a LMIC-setting, paediatric RTI patients are more frequently brought to medical attention, sustain more severe injuries and more frequently require hospital admission during the weekend. Weekends during the last annual quarter were particularly high-risk for paediatric RTIs. These findings highlight the importance of trauma surveillance data to inform targeted community prevention strategies for improving child road safety.     

The value of compassion: Healthcare savings of palliative care consults in trauma

BackgroundThe effects of palliative care (PC) consultation on patient costs and hospitalization metrics in the adult trauma population are unclear.Study DesignWe interrogated our Level I trauma center databases from 1/1/19 to 3/31/21 for patients age ≥18 admitted to the trauma service. Patients undergoing PC consult were matched using propensity scoring to those without PC consultation based on age, admission Glasgow Coma Scale score, Injury Severity Score and Head Abbreviated Injury Scale. Total costs, total cost per day, hospital length of stay (LOS), ICU LOS, intubation days, discharge disposition, and rates of nephrology consultation and tracheostomy/feeding tube placements were compared.Results140 unique patients underwent PC consultation and were matched to a group not receiving PC consult during the same period. Median total costs in the PC cohort were $39,532 compared to $70,330 in the controls (p<0.01).  Median costs per day in the PC cohort were $3,495 vs $17,970 in the controls (p<0.01).  Median costs per ICU day in the PC cohort were $3,774 vs $17,127 in the controls (p<0.01).  Mean hospital LOS (15.7 vs 7 days), ICU LOS (7.9 vs 2.9 days), and ventilator days (5.1 vs 1.5) were significantly higher in the PC cohort (all p<0.01).  Rates of nephrology consultation (8.6 vs 2.1%, p = 0.03) and tracheostomy/feeding tube placements (12.1 vs 1.4%, p<0.01) were also higher in the PC group.  Patients were more likely to discharge to hospice if they received a PC consult (33.6 vs 2.1%, p<0.01).  Mean time to PC consult was 7.2 days (range 1 hour to 45 days). LOS post-consult correlated positively with time to PC consultation (r = 0.27, p<0.01).ConclusionExpert PC services are known to alleviate suffering and avert patient goal- and value-incongruent care. While trauma patients demand significant resources, PC consultation offered in concordance with life-sustaining interventions is associated with significant savings to patients and the healthcare system. Given the correlation between LOS following PC consult and time to PC consult, savings may be amplified by earlier PC consultation in appropriate patients.     

Pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures and vascular injuries: A cross-sectional study based on the National Trauma Data Bank

ObjectiveSupracondylar humerus (SCH) fractures represent one of the most commonly treated fractures. We sought to determine: 1) how often SCH fractures are associated with vascular injury; 2) mechanism of injuries; 3) where cases are treated 4) time to operating room (OR); and 5) length of stay (LOS).MethodsThe 2007–2014 National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) data were analyzed for all patients <18 years of age who presented with an isolated supracondylar humerus fracture, with or without an associated vascular injury. Both non-operative and operative management were included. Main outcome measures were demographics, mechanism of injury, presence of vascular injury, time to OR, number of OR procedures, type of treating facility, and LOS. Comparisons were performed using Chi square test for categorical variables and Student’s t-test for continuous variables.ResultsWe identified a total of 53,571 pediatric patients over eight years with SCH fractures. Vascular injuries occurred in 149 patients (0.3%), which were significantly more common with open fractures (p < 0.001). Patients with vascular injuries had significantly longer LOS (3.5 days v 1.4 days; p < 0.001) and shorter times to the OR (4.7 h v 10.4 h; p < 0.001), and were more likely to be treated in teaching hospitals and pediatric level 1 trauma centers (p = 0.037).ConclusionThe percentage of vascular injuries associated with SCH fractures in pediatric patients remains low (0.3%). The majority of pediatric patients with these injuries are treated at level 1 pediatric trauma centers.Level of evidenceTherapeutic, III.     

Interpersonal violence affecting the pediatric population: Patterns of injury and recidivism

PurposeWe aim to describe interpersonal violence-related injury patterns in the pediatric trauma population and to identify predictors of recidivism.MethodsIn this retrospective analysis from a single institution, we included pediatric patients (≤17 years) treated (2006–2020) for traumatic injury related to interpersonal violence (IPV). Patient characteristics were compared among mechanism types and between recidivists and non recidivists using two sample t-tests, Wilcoxon rank-sum tests, and Pearson's chi-squared. Multivariate analysis was performed using logistic regression to identify predictors of repeat injury.ResultsWe identified 635 pediatric patients who sustained injuries owning to IPV: firearm (N = 266), assault (stab/blunt; N = 243), and abuse (N = 126). The average age of the firearm, assault, and abuse groups was 15.5, 14.7, and 1.1 years (SD = 2.2, 3.4, 2.4 years), respectively. Majority of the overall cohort was male (77.5%) and publicly- or un insured (67.8%), with 28.0% being Black. Of the 489 firearm and assault patients who survived the first injury, 30 (6.1%) had repeat injury owning to IPV requiring treatment at our center with a median time of 40 months (IQR 17-62 months) between first and second injury. The majority of recidivists (83.3%) were victims of gun violence whereas the distribution between assault and firearm in the non recidivists was more even at 51 and 49%, respectively (p < 0.001). Eighteen (60.0%) of the recidivist patients had the same mechanism between the first and second injury. In the logistic regression analysis, Black race and firearm injury were associated with greater than 3-fold higher likelihood of repeat injury compared to white race after adjusting for age, sex, insurance, and child opportunity index.ConclusionsWe found that survivors of firearm injuries and assault comprise a vulnerable patient cohort at risk for repeat injury, and Black race is an independent predictor of repeat injury owning to IPV. These findings provide guidance for developing violence prevention programs.Type of studyRetrospective Comparative StudyLevel of evidenceLevel III     

Pediatric firearm injury trends in the United States: A national trauma data bank (NTDB) analysis

Aim of studyFirearm injuries are the second leading cause of injury-related death in the USA in children less than 18. We compared overall and intent-specific firearm hospitalizations across age group and race to understand recent trends.MethodsA retrospective cohort of 20,083 children from the national trauma data bank involved in incidences of firearm discharges from 2013 to 2017 was divided by race, discharge intent, gun type, and four age groups: infants (ages 0–2), toddlers (3–6), children (7–12), and adolescents (13–18). Discharge intent and gun type were determined by ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM External Causes of Injury codes. Injury severity score (ISS), hospital discharge disposition, and length of stay (LOS) were used as predictors for morbidity and mortality.ResultsFrom 2013 to 2017, there were on an average 4016 firearm injuries reported to the NTDB (n = 20,083). 71% (n = 14,313) of the incidents were assaults. Victims who identified as African American and Caucasian made up 60% (n = 11,890) and 26% (n = 5162) of the total victims, respectively, and were predominantly male (86%, n = 17,202). Victims who identified as Caucasian made up 70% of suicides (n = 819), while African Americans made up 70% of assaults (n = 9733). 87% (n = 17,525) of the patient population were adolescents. The number of accidental firearm discharges compared to firearm assaults was greater for toddlers, while the opposite was true for infants, children, and adolescents. Average LOS by age group varied each year, though children had the highest total average LOS.  Average ISS was highest for infants and adolescents (11.5 and 10.4) and American Indians and Caucasians (10.1 and 11.1). Overall mortality rate was 6% (n = 1220) and had no significant differences between years. Mortality rate was highest for infants (7%, n = 25).ConclusionsAdolescent males and African Americans were disproportionately affected by overall and assault-specific firearm discharges. Firearm injury prevention legislation is critical to prevent these injures.     

Trauma recidivism is pervasive and is associated with mental and social health opportunities

IntroductionRecidivism after orthopedic trauma results in greater morbidity and costs. Prior studies explored the effects of social and medical factors affecting the frequency of return to the hospital with new, unrelated injury. Identification of mental, social and other risk factors for trauma recidivism may provide opportunities for mitigation. The purposes of this study are to determine the rates of subsequent, unrelated injury noted among orthopedic trauma patients at a large urban trauma center and to evaluate what patient and injury features are associated with greater rates of trauma recidivism. We hypothesize higher rates of new injuries will be related to ballistic trauma and other forms of assault, alcohol and recreational drug use, unemployment, and unmarried status among our trauma patients.MethodsA series of 954 skeletally mature patients at a level 1 trauma center over a 5 year period were included in the study. All were treated operatively for thoracolumbar, pelvic ring, acetabulum, and/or proximal or shaft femoral fractures from a high energy mechanism. Retrospective review of demographic, injury, medical, and social factors, and subsequent care was performed. Trauma recidivism was defined as returning to the emergency department for treatment of any new injury. A backward stepwise logistic regression statistical analysis was used to identify independent predictors of recidivism.ResultsMean age of all patients was 41.2 years, and 73.2% were male. 136 patients (14.3%) returned with a new injury within a mean of 21 months. These trauma recidivists were more likely to sustain a GSW (22.1% vs 11.4%, p = 0.001). They had higher rates of substance use, including tobacco (57.4% vs 41.8%, p = 0.001) and recreational drugs (50.7% vs 34.4%, p = 0.001), and were less likely to be married (10% vs 25.9%, p<0.001). Mental illness was pervasive, noted in 56.6% of patients with new injury (vs 32.8%, p<0.001). Medicaid insurance was most common in the trauma recidivist population (58.1% vs 35.0%, p = 0.001), and 12.5% were uninsured. Completing high school or more education was protective (93% non-recidivist (vs 79%, p = 0.001). Sixty-nine patients (50.7%) were repeat trauma recidivists within the study period. Independent predictors of new injury included recreational drug use (OR 1.64, p = 0.05) and history of assault due to GSW or other means (OR 1.67, p = 0.05). History of pre-existing mental illness represented the greatest risk factor for trauma recidivism (OR 2.55, p<0.001).DiscussionNew injuries resulting in emergency department presentation after prior orthopedic trauma occurred in 14.3% and were associated with history of assault, lower education, Medicaid insurance, tobacco smoking and recreational drug use. Mental illness was the greatest risk factor. Over half of patients with these additional injuries were repeat trauma recidivists, returning for another new injury within less than 2 years. Awareness of risk factors may promote focused education and other interventions to mitigate this burden.Level of EvidenceLevel 3 retrospective, prognostic     

Balanced hemostatic resuscitation for bleeding pediatric trauma patients: A nationwide quantitative analysis of outcomes

BackgroundThe administration of balanced component therapy has been associated with improvements in outcomes in adult trauma. There is little to no specific data to guide transfusion ratios in children. The aim of our study is to compare outcomes among different transfusion strategies in pediatric trauma patients.MethodsWe conducted a (2014–2016) retrospective analysis of the Trauma Quality Improvement Program. We selected all pediatric (age < 18) trauma patients who received at least one unit of packed red blood cells (PRBC) and fresh frozen plasma (FFP) within 4 h of admission. Patients were stratified based on their FFP:PRBC transfusion ratio in the first 4 h into: 1:1, 1:2, 1:3, and 1:3+. Primary outcomes were 24-mortality, in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes were complications and 24 h PRBC transfusion requirements. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed.ResultsA total of 1,233 patients were identified of which 637 received transfusion ratio of 1:1, 365 1:2, 116 1:3, and 115 1:3+. Mean age was 11 ± 6y, 70% were male, ISS was 27 [20–38], and 62% sustained penetrating injuries. Patients in the 1:1 group had the lowest 24 h mortality (14% vs. 18% vs. 22% vs. 24%; p = 0.01) and in-hospital mortality (32% vs. 36% vs. 40% vs. 44%; p = 0.01). No difference was found between the groups in terms of complications (22% vs. 21% vs. 23% vs. 22%; p = 0.96) such as acute respiratory distress syndrome (3.3% vs. 3.6% vs. 0.9% vs. 0%; p = 0.10), and acute kidney injury (3% vs. 2.2% vs. 0.9% vs. 0.9%; p = 0.46). Additionally the 1:1 group had the lowest PRBC transfusion requirements (3[2–7] vs. 5[2–10] vs. 6[3–8] vs. 6[4–10]; p < 0.01). On regression analysis a progressive increase in the mortality adjusted odds ratio was observed as the FFP:PRBC transfusion ratio decreased.ConclusionFFP:PRBC ratios closest to 1 were associated with increased survival in children. The resuscitation of pediatric patients should target a 1:1 ratio of FFP:PRBC. Further studies are needed for the development of massive transfusion protocols for this age group.Level of evidenceLevel IVStudy typeTherapeutic/Care Management     

Prehospital personnel discretion pediatric trauma team activations: Too much of a good thing?

PurposeTrauma team activation is essential to provide rapid assessment of injured patients, however excessive utilization can overburden systems. We aimed to identify predictors of over triage and evaluate impact of prehospital personal discretion trauma activations on the over triage rate.MethodsRetrospective comparative study of pediatric trauma patients (<18 years) evaluated after activation of the trauma team to those evaluated as a trauma consult treated between 2010 and 2013. Cohort matching of trauma activated and consult patients was done on the basis of patients’ age and ISS.Results1363 patients including 359 trauma team activations were evaluated. Median age was 6 years, Injury Severity Score (ISS) 4, 116 (8.5%) required operative intervention and 20 (1.4%) died.Matched analysis using age and ISS showed trauma activated patients were more likely to have penetrating MOI (4.7% vs.1.7%; p = 0.03) and need ICU admission(32.9% vs.16.7%; p = 0.0001). State of Florida discrete criteria based trauma activated patients when compared to paramedic discretion activations had a higher ISS (9 vs.5; p = 0.014), need for ICU admission (36.5% vs.20.4%; p = 0.004), ICU LOS(2 vs.0 days; p = 0.02), hospital LOS(2 vs.2 days; p = 0.014) and higher likelihood of death(4.9% vs.0%;p = 0.0001). Moreover, paramedic discretion trauma activated patients were similar to trauma consult patients in terms of ISS score(p = 0.86), need for ICU admission(p = 0.86), operative intervention(p = 0.86), death(p = 0.86) and hospital LOS(p = 0.86), with a considerably higher cost of care(p = 0.0002).ConclusionDiscrete criteria-based trauma team activations appear to more reliably identify patients likely to benefit from initial multidisciplinary management.     

National trends in pediatric firearm and automobile fatalities

BackgroundSuccessful public health policies and injury prevention efforts have reduced pediatric automobile fatalities across the United States. In 2019, firearm injuries exceeded motor vehicle crashes (MVC) as the leading cause of childhood death in Colorado. We sought to determine if similar trends exist nationally and if state gun laws impact firearm injury fatality rates.MethodsAnnual pediatric (≤19 years-old) fatality rates for firearm injuries and MVCs were obtained from the CDC WONDER database (1999–2020). State gun law scores were based on the 2014–2020 Gifford's Annual Gun Law Scorecard and strength was categorized by letter grades A-F. Poisson generalized linear mixed models were used to model fatality rates. Rates were estimated for multiple timepoints and compared between grade levels.ResultsIn 1999, the national pediatric fatality rate for MVCs was 248% higher than firearm injuries (Incidence Rate Ratio (IRR) 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 2.25–2.73, p<0.0001). By 2020, the fatality rate for MVCs was 16% lower than that of firearm injuries (IRR 95% CI: 0.75- 0.93, p = 0.0014). For each increase in letter grade for gun law strength there was an 18% reduction in the firearm fatality rate (IRR 95%CI: 0.78–0.86, p<0.0001). States with the strongest gun laws (A) had a 55% lower firearm fatality rate compared to those with the weakest laws (F).ConclusionFirearm injuries are the leading cause of death in pediatric patients across the United States. State gun law strength has a significant impact on pediatric firearm injury fatality rates. New public health policies, political action, media attention and safer guns are urgently needed to curb this national crisis.Level of Evidence/Study TypeLevel III, retrospective     

Does the mechanism matter? Comparing thrombelastography between blunt and penetrating pediatric trauma patients

Background/PurposeThe utility of thrombelastography (TEG) in pediatric trauma remains unknown, and differences in coagulopathy between blunt and penetrating mechanisms are not established. We aimed to compare TEG patterns in pediatric trauma patients with blunt solid organ injuries (BSOI) and penetrating injuries to determine the role of mechanism in coagulopathy.MethodsHighest-level pediatric trauma activations with BSOI or penetrating injuries and admission TEG at two pediatric trauma centers were included. TEG abnormalities were defined by each institution's normative values and compared separately by injury mechanism and evidence of shock (elevated SIPA) using Kruskal-Wallis or Fisher's exact tests.ResultsOf 118 patients included, 64 had BSOI and 54 had penetrating injuries. There were no significant differences in TEG abnormalities between the BSOI and penetrating injury groups. Patients with shock were more likely to have decreased alpha-angles (30.9% vs. 8.0%, p = 0.01) and decreased maximum amplitude (MA) (44.1% vs. 8.0%, p < 0.001) compared to those without shock, regardless of mechanism of injury.ConclusionsTEG abnormalities were not significantly different between the BSOI and penetrating groups, but there were significant differences in alpha-angle and MA in those with shock, independent of mechanism. Hemodynamic status, rather than mechanism of injury, may be more predictive of coagulopathy in pediatric trauma patients.Level of evidence/study typeLevel III, retrospective     

Vascular repair after firearm injury is associated with increased morbidity and mortality

ObjectiveFirearm injuries have high morbidity and mortality. Presentation of injuries requiring concurrent vascular repair and its outcomes are unclear. Our study's objective was to characterize the injury details and to assess the associated mortality and morbidity after vascular repair.MethodsThe National Inpatient Sample was queried from 1993 to 2014 for all firearm injuries. International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes were used to identify firearm injuries and those who also underwent a vascular repair. Multivariable analysis was used to assess the effect of a concurrent vascular repair on outcomes.ResultsThere were 648,662 firearm injuries identified; 63,973 (9.9%) involved a vascular repair. Overall, 88.7% of patients were male, and Medicaid was the most common insurance (40.2%). Intents were assault or legal intervention (60%), unintentional (24.2%), and suicide (8.6%). Patients undergoing vascular repair were younger, more often of black race and male sex, and on Medicaid insurance, with a lower household income and assault/legal intent (P < .005). Patients who underwent vascular repair had a higher frequency of abdomen/pelvis and extremity injuries as well as an elevated New Injury Severity Score (P < .005). Patients with vascular repair were more frequently treated at urban, teaching, and large hospitals (P < .005). Overall mortality rate was 2.2%; patients who underwent vascular repair had a higher mortality compared with those without (5.51% vs 1.98%; P < .001). Patients with vascular repair had higher rates of acute renal failure (3.1% vs 0.8%), venous thromboembolic events (0.5% vs 0.3%), pulmonary-related events (0.6% vs 0.28%), cardiac-related events (0.8% vs 0.2%), sepsis (1.4% vs 0.5%), and any complication (5.7% vs 2%; all P < .0001). Vascular repair was independently associated with mortality (odds ratio [OR], 2.68; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.43-2.95; P < .0001). Age older than 46 years (OR, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.71-2.35; P < .0001), male sex (OR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.05-1.25; P = .003), self-pay/no insurance (OR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.47-1.75; P < .0001), suicide intent (OR, 3.73; 95% CI, 3.36-4.13; P < .0001), unintentional intent (OR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.03-1.22; P < .0001), head/neck location (OR, 13.9; 95% CI, 12.5-15.6; P < .0001), Northeast region, and New Injury Severity Score >4 were independently associated with in-hospital mortality. Vascular repair was also independently associated with any complication (OR, 2.12; 95% CI, 1.98-2.28; P < .0001).ConclusionsFirearm injuries with vascular repair were independently associated with higher injury severity score and mortality. A majority of vascular repairs were performed for injury to the abdomen/pelvis and extremity with assault/legal intent, whereas head and neck injury and suicide intent were the least frequent.